
Congress significantly reduced the scope of the Alternative Minimum Tax, also known as the AMT, under the new tax law. Wall Street Journal tax reporter Laura Saunders explains which taxpayers still fall under the unpopular rule, and which tax benefits can push some taxpayers to have to pay the AMT.
Loading summary
Deel Advertiser
Deal replaces fragmented payroll vendors with one global system. No third parties hire, manage and pay teams in 150 plus countries operate like a local everywhere. Visit D eel.com WSJ your money briefing
J.R. Whalen
money in market stories from the Wall street journal. I'm J.R. whalen in New York. The alternative minimum tax, also known as the amt, has been significantly reduced under the new tax law. But who still faces paying taxes under the much maligned rule? We'll discuss in a moment. First, these money headlines. More signs will be paying more at the pump in the coming months. The oil industry is showing jitters ahead of an expected return of US Sanctions on Iran, which could reduce the amount of oil in the global marketplace. And while the price of oil is currently hovering around $70 per barrel, some oil investors are suggesting a jump to $100 a barrel is not far fetched. And the Florida estate of NBA superstar Shaquille O' Neal is going on the market for $28 million. Enormous and highly customized home includes the Shack center fitness facility that features a 6,000 square foot basketball court and the Shakapulco outdoor swimming complex. Also, there are two garages which combined fit about 17 cars. This is your money briefing from the Wall Street Journal. Welcome back, everybody. Many taxpayers cringe when they hear about the alternative minimum tax, or amt. But there's a good news, bad news scenario and Wall Street Journal tax reporter Laura Saunders is here to spell it out for us. So, Laura, the AMT is known unofficially as the rich person's tax. But the good news here, as you say in your story, is it's a shell of its former self. A lot less taxpayers are impacted by it.
Laura Saunders
It's often called the dreaded AMT because it's complex. It's surprising. It seem out of nowhere and it began as a rich person's tax in 1969. It only affected people with about $1.5 million in income in today's dollars. But over time, as happens with the things in the tax cut, it wasn't indexed and it changed and it wound up affecting a lot of affluent people, people making $200,000 or even below that and falling mainly on people making between $200,000 to $500,000. Now, the good news and it' now is that Congress scaled it way back. They had vowed to the Republicans in Congress had vowed to repeal it. They didn't do that, but they scaled it back so that it is a shadow of its former self. It's not out, but it's way, way down.
J.R. Whalen
So there was A point where, under the current rules, or I should say before the Congress got involved, that millions of people were affected by the amt, and that number is far lower now.
Laura Saunders
Yes, it was for 2018. It was going to be about 5 million filers. And under the new system, it's only about 200,000 filers. That is a huge drop.
J.R. Whalen
It definitely is. And the reduction of the amount of state and local taxes that can be deducted also helps to lessen the chance that taxpayers would be hit by the amt.
Laura Saunders
Well, it's. Yes, how it works is so complicated, we can barely even talk about it. But it is basically a parallel tax system. You have to figure your taxes two ways and pay whichever's most, you know, the most. And the AMT takes away the value of a lot of tax breaks that you get under the regular tax if you're taking too many breaks. So that's sort of this weird, contorted logic. And the big things that used to trigger the AMT were taking state and local taxes, personal exemptions, everybody got those. And miscellaneous deductions, like for unreimbursed employee expenses and things like that, meals, entertainment. Now those are all gone or reduced. So that's one of the things really helps fewer people be subject to it. And they also expanded an exemption. So if you're making between $200,000 and $500,000, only 120,000 people will be paying that tax, versus about 4 million last year.
J.R. Whalen
You also write about some taxpayers that can accumulate AMT credits. How does that work?
Laura Saunders
It's a crazy tax, but it used to be that. See, the breaks that are taken away by the AMT fall into two buckets. One is things like state taxes. You never get those back. But if it's some arcane things like net operating loss, carryforwards, or depreciation, the benefits are postponed, those turn into credits. Now you can only use them if you get off the amt, and people never did. But now that they're getting off of it, they'll be able to use these credits.
J.R. Whalen
So there is some bad news here. And so there are things that would push people back into AMT territory.
Laura Saunders
Yes. The bad news, though, comes with good news, which is that most of the things that push people onto the AMT are much less common. They're much more esoteric. Having interest from certain kinds of municipal bonds or net operating loss, carryforwards or incentive stock options. That is not like the old triggers that were things like state and local taxes.
J.R. Whalen
And while the reach of the AMT has been reduced. It could return to its original evil self if Congress doesn't get involved eight years from now.
Laura Saunders
Well, that's it. You know, there were lots of tricks that got this tax bill through Congress and timing tricks. And this is one of the provisions that's generally I think people think it's a good provision, but the problem is it expires at the end of 2025. So in 2026, the old AMT comes roaring back. Unless Congress.
J.R. Whalen
Well, that'd be a good year to write a letter to your congressperson. That's Wall Street Journal tax reporter Laura Saunders joining us here in our studio. Laura, thanks for being with us.
Laura Saunders
And thank you.
J.R. Whalen
And that's your money briefing. I'm JR Whalen in New York for the Wall Street Journal.
Deel Advertiser
Still running global payroll like a relay race. Deal replaces fragmented Payroll vendors with one global system. No third parties. Hire, manage and pay teams in 150 plus countries with in house local experts and white glove delivery and deal plugs into what you already use. Workday SAP Netsuite operate like a local everywhere. Visit d e l.com WSJ that's d e e l.com WSJ.
Date: May 21, 2018
Host: J.R. Whalen
Guest: Laura Saunders, WSJ Tax Reporter
In this episode, host J.R. Whalen interviews Wall Street Journal tax reporter Laura Saunders to break down the recent changes to the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) under the new tax law. They explore how the AMT has become significantly less impactful for most taxpayers, what kinds of filers it still affects, and discuss future implications if Congress does not take further action.
On the AMT’s Origins and Shrinkage:
"It began as a rich person's tax in 1969. It only affected people with about $1.5 million in income in today's dollars. But over time...it wound up affecting a lot of affluent people, even below that."
—Laura Saunders (01:48)
On AMT Credits:
"But now that they're getting off of it, they'll be able to use these credits."
—Laura Saunders (04:17)
On the Potential Return of the Old AMT:
"So in 2026, the old AMT comes roaring back. Unless Congress..."
—Laura Saunders (05:24)
This episode offers clear, practical explanations for current and future taxpayers about who faces the AMT now, why that number has dropped, and what to watch for as 2026 approaches.