Loading summary
American National Insurance Announcer
Protecting your nest egg no matter what the market does. Most people call that the smart money. At American National Insurance Co. We call it a multi year guarantee annuity. Fund your annuity online@annuities.americannational.com here's your money.
Mariana Aspuru
Briefing for Wednesday, February 26th. I'm Mariana Aspuru. For THE Wall. Recent layoffs and hiring freezes from the Trump administration have left Americans employed by the federal government on shaky ground.
Justin LeHart
If you are a federal worker and you lose your job, you are going to spend less money until you're able to find new employment. If you're a federal worker and you don't lose your job, but you've seen these mass layoffs, maybe you're not going to think about buying that new washing machine. Maybe you're going to be a little bit more conservative with your cash. That could have an effect on businesses.
Mariana Aspuru
We'll talk to Wall Street Journal reporter Justin LeHart about what it could mean for the economy if hundreds of thousands of those jobs go away. That's after the break.
American National Insurance Announcer
In today's market, one of the most precious commodities you can add to your portfolio is certainty, the kind you get with a multi year guarantee annuity from American National Insurance Company. Your money grows at a steady rate, guaranteed. No hidden fees, no market risk, no surprises. Just a bedrock of certainty you can depend on to be there when you need it most. You can get more details and fund an annuity online@annuities.americannational.com you got this.
Mariana Aspuru
America's biggest employer, the federal government, is conducting mass layoffs and how it'll impact our economy is still unclear. Wall Street Journal reporter Justin lehart joins me. Justin, let's take a step back. What started these job cuts?
Justin LeHart
Well, the first thing is on Inauguration Day, President Trump instituted a hiring freeze. Shortly after that, Doge starts with a mandate to go in and reduce the federal workforce.
Mariana Aspuru
And now there's been something called deferred resignation on certain federal employees. Tell me where that's left some people.
Justin LeHart
There was an offer for deferred resignation. The idea was that you'll continue to get paid through September and not work. And as far as we can tell, about 75,000 people accepted that. So those folks are still on the payroll. They will be on the payroll through September. So they won't show up as people without jobs. But they aren't working.
Mariana Aspuru
When we're talking about these federal layoffs, can you throw out some numbers just so we know the scope of how many people are involved and how many people could be involved in the coming months.
Justin LeHart
We really don't have a great handle on this, to be honest. Some agencies have had announcements, some haven't. It's unclear how good the numbers are so far, and this is really through last Friday. It was somewhere in the neighborhood of 30,000 people that were laid off. As far as folks could tell, there could be more. It seems almost certain that there is more coming. In addition, the hiring freeze has an impact just like any other employer. There's a lot of churn in the federal government. People are retiring, people are quitting, taking new jobs and so forth. The hiring freeze alone, over the course of the year, that would reduce employment by about 200,000. And that's from a federal workforce of about 2.4 million employees. And that excludes the post office.
Mariana Aspuru
Tell me about some of these employees that are impacted. You said it doesn't include the Postal Service, so what does it include?
Justin LeHart
You're seeing park employees, you're seeing employees at USAID offices. You're seeing just folks all over the country are losing their jobs. Now, how big a portion of the workforce is it still? We don't know.
Mariana Aspuru
When will we know the extent of these job cuts?
Justin LeHart
It'll take a while for it to show up in the data. One of the first things that we'll notice is people will start filing for unemployment. So we'll see those will begin to pick up. It'll take a while for it to pick up in the monthly jobs report. And that's just because of the way that those numbers are collected. It's really a mid month number, so we really might not see the full effect of that until sometime later in the spring. There's a lot of collateral damage to the job market that we're going to see as well. There are some economies that are pretty dependent on the federal workforce. Obviously D.C. and the neighboring counties. Most states have some county with a big proportion of federal workers. You might see things there. We're seeing some job losses for federal contractors as well as that's a really massive group. We don't have a great handle on how many people are federal contractors, but the number is somewhere in the order of 5 million.
Mariana Aspuru
In your story, you wrote that these layoffs could have a minor or a seriously damaging impact on the economy. Why is it uncertain?
Justin LeHart
First thing? Because we just don't know how many there are. If you have a lot of layoffs, it could have a huge impact. If you have not so many, not as much an impact beyond the size. How quickly can people who were laid off Find new work. One concern there is they tend to be pretty educated and older, and that makes it harder to find a new job. If you live in D.C. there's not going to be as many jobs in D.C. so you might have to move. That can make those transitions difficult as well. The other thing is these federal workers, they are providing services. If you're able to cut the workforce and keep on providing those services, then that's one thing. If in cutting the workforce, you stop providing those services or you delay some of those services, that can cludge up a lot of other economic activity and that can be a problem. Let's take the Department of Education, for example. It doesn't employ that many people. There's 4,400 people at the Department of Education. Education, that's a rounding error when it comes to the US Job market. But a lot of funding for schools around the country comes from the Department of Education. So if there are any sorts of delays or problems with that funding, that's a problem for states. That could cause problems.
Mariana Aspuru
And what other factors are impacting the labor market right now, aside from this?
Justin LeHart
That's one of the most important things to think about here is it's not just one thing that's going on. At the same time we have restrictions on immigration and there's concerns about supply of workers. In that case, we have tariffs. That's causing uncertainty among businesses, making it harder for them to plan out and hire. There's also been drops in other types of funding funding for universities. A lot of universities have put through hiring freezes. There's also the worries about National Institute of Health funding, which could also have a labor market impacts. It's everything everywhere, all at once happening here. And that could have a deleterious effect on the job market.
Mariana Aspuru
How do these layoffs affect consumer behavior?
Justin LeHart
The first thing, obviously, if you are a federal worker and you lose your job, you are going to spend less money until you're able to find new employment. If you're a federal worker and you don't lose your job, but you've seen these mass layoffs, maybe you're not going to think about buying that new washing machine. Maybe you're going to be a little bit more conservative with your cash. That could have an effect on businesses. And then if you just open up sort of newspapers around the country, that news about these layoffs is there in the front pages and that could have an effect on people as well. Just seeing that, worrying about that, maybe people get a little bit cautious when it comes to spending.
Mariana Aspuru
That's WSJ reporter Justin lehart. And that's it for your money Briefing. This episode was produced by Zoe Culkin with supervising producer Melanie Roy. I'm Mariana Aspuru for the Wall Street Journal.
Podcast Host/Outro Speaker
Thanks for listening. Foreign.
AWS Executive Insights Announcer
From AI adoption to building stronger teams, hear how today's leaders are putting strategy into motion. Stay informed and inspired with the Executive Insights podcast brought to you by aws, available on all major podcast platforms.
Date: February 26, 2025
Host: Mariana Aspuru
Guest: Justin LeHart, Wall Street Journal Reporter
This episode explores the recent mass layoffs within the federal government following new Trump administration policies, including a sweeping hiring freeze and mandates for workforce reductions. Mariana Aspuru and reporter Justin LeHart discuss the scope and uncertainty surrounding these cuts, their potential ripple effects on the broader US economy, and what this means for both federal workers and the general public. Listeners gain insight into both the human and economic impact of large-scale federal layoffs and why predicting consequences remains difficult.
[02:13]
“On Inauguration Day, President Trump instituted a hiring freeze. Shortly after that, DOJ starts with a mandate to go in and reduce the federal workforce.”
— Justin LeHart [02:13]
[02:27]
“The idea was that you’ll continue to get paid through September and not work. And as far as we can tell, about 75,000 people accepted that.”
— Justin LeHart [02:34]
[03:00–04:10]
"Somewhere in the neighborhood of 30,000 people were laid off...the hiring freeze alone, over the course of the year, would reduce employment by about 200,000."
— Justin LeHart [03:12] "You're seeing park employees, you're seeing employees at USAID offices. You're seeing just folks all over the country are losing their jobs."
— Justin LeHart [04:10]
[04:23–05:29]
[05:29–07:00]
"If in cutting the workforce, you stop providing those services...that can cludge up a lot of other economic activity and that can be a problem."
— Justin LeHart [06:20]
[07:00–07:48]
"It's everything everywhere, all at once happening here. And that could have a deleterious effect on the job market."
— Justin LeHart [07:44]
[07:48–08:33]
“If you are a federal worker and you lose your job, you are going to spend less money until you’re able to find new employment...maybe you’re not going to think about buying that new washing machine. Maybe you’re going to be a little bit more conservative with your cash.”
— Justin LeHart [07:52]
“Just seeing that, worrying about that, maybe people get a little bit cautious when it comes to spending.”
— Justin LeHart [08:24]
On Data Uncertainty:
“It’s unclear how good the numbers are so far, and this is really through last Friday. It was somewhere in the neighborhood of 30,000 people that were laid off. As far as folks could tell, there could be more. It seems almost certain that there is more coming.”
— Justin LeHart [03:12]
On Local Impact:
“Most states have some county with a big proportion of federal workers. You might see things there. We’re seeing some job losses for federal contractors as well, as that’s a really massive group.”
— Justin LeHart [04:56]
On Challenges for Laid-Off Workers:
“They tend to be pretty educated and older, and that makes it harder to find a new job. If you live in D.C. there’s not going to be as many jobs in D.C., so you might have to move.”
— Justin LeHart [05:48]
On the Interconnected Nature of Layoffs and Spending:
“Maybe you’re going to be a little bit more conservative with your cash. That could have an effect on businesses.”
— Justin LeHart [07:56]
This episode provides a comprehensive examination of current mass layoffs in the federal workforce, explaining the policies that led here, the huge scope and uncertainty of their impact, and the potential for ongoing economic ripple effects. The conversation offers clear insight into why predicting the economic outcome remains difficult—numbers are uncertain, effects on service delivery are unclear, and broader economic stress is mounting from other factors. Both federal workers and consumers across the country are feeling the pressure, not only through loss of income but also diminished confidence and spending, creating a climate of economic caution that could deepen over time.