
The $3 trillion stimulus package passed by the Democratic-led House last week faces long odds in the GOP-controlled Senate. But a second round of direct payments to Americans isn't off the table. Wall Street Journal tax reporter Richard Rubin explains.
Loading summary
Deel Representative
Still running global payroll like a relay race. Deal replaces fragmented payroll vendors with one global system. No third parties hire, manage and pay teams in 150 plus countries with in house local experts and white glove delivery and deal plugs into what you already use. Workday SAP, Netsuite operate like a local everywhere. Visit d e l.com WSJ that's d e e l.com WSJ.
J.R. Whelan
Here's your money briefing for Tuesday, May 19th. I'm J.R. whalen for the Wall Street Journal. The $3 trillion stimulus package passed by the Democratic led House last week faces tough odds in the Republican Senate. A chunk of the money would go toward helping Americans pay their bills, but the GOP feels those payments could actually slow down a recovery.
Richard Rubin
Yeah, that's part of the Republican concern, partly about these payments and partly about unemployment insurance that's larger than what people can get from working is that they're really trying to tie additional aid to work, whether it's incentives for companies to keep paying people as they have reduced hours or hiring bonuses or something that sort of is related to work.
J.R. Whelan
So what should you expect from a second round of stimulus payments, if anything? Coming up, Wall Street Journal reporter Richard Rubin will explain where negotiations stand on Capitol Hill. Many Americans have already used up the $1,200 stimulus payment and lawmakers are preparing a new round of checks. But an aid package passed by Democrats in the House last week is a long shot in the GOP led Senate. Wall Street Journal tax reporter Richard Rubin joins us to explain why. So, Richard, for Americans, a new round of payments could definitely come in handy, but what would it say about the health of the economy?
Richard Rubin
Well, and I think it's what it would say about the health of the economy that's making it unclear whether there's going to be another round. If there's another round, that's really a signal from Congress that they think we're in for a much longer haul of recession and recovery here, the sort of swoosh shaped recovery that you hear people talking about as opposed to the quick bounce back V shape where you kind of wouldn't need more payments because people are going to go back to work and have jobs and spend money and everything's going to kind of be more back to normal by the fall. So it's almost sort of an indicator of where the political mood is about the economy. And that's what you're seeing as Congress talks about whether to have more payments.
J.R. Whelan
So Republicans in the Senate feel that more stimulus would not only paint a picture of a still ailing economy, but could in reality slow down a recovery.
Richard Rubin
Yeah, that's part of the Republican concern, partly about these payments and partly about unemployment insurance that's larger than what people can get from working, is that they're really trying to tie additional aid to work, whether it's incentives for companies to keep paying people as they have reduced hours or hiring bonuses or something that sort of is related to work. And this policy, you know, has been money just going to people all over the place regardless of whether they're working or not. And it's not that Republicans are necessarily opposed to another round of payments. They're, they're not dead set against it. I wouldn't discount it maybe happening, but it's, it's certainly not the, you know, most popular thing right now among Republicans.
J.R. Whelan
Under the stimulus proposal that so far has been approved by Democrats, how would the dollars differ from the first round?
Richard Rubin
So that bill that passed, passed the House last week, would have 1,200 per adult again, but then it would have 1200 per child as opposed to 500 per child. And it also allows those dependent payments to go for college students and adult dependents and who were both sort of excluded from the first round of payments. And so this next round would be in all, maybe 400 and some billion as opposed to about 300 billion from the previous round. So that's a pretty significant jump in terms of the size of what we're talking about here.
J.R. Whelan
Now, this proposed stimulus package is retroactive. What exactly does that mean?
Richard Rubin
Well, sort of, I mean, those changes to allow adult dependents and college students, those changes in eligibility would be retroactive. So there'd be additional payments that the people would be eligible for. If you're in those groups and didn't get it the first time around, and then the second round of payments would, you know, would be prospective, would be going forward.
J.R. Whelan
Is part of the reason for the rocky path toward resolution here due to the fact that there really isn't a blueprint to refer to, like comparing it to the 2008 recession?
Richard Rubin
Yeah, it's really about trying to figure out what it is that Congress is trying to do. Is it trying to sort of plug holes in people's budgets? Is it trying to get people to spend money? Is it trying to encourage people to go back to work? Like the Congress, you know, so far has really tried to do all of that. And there's, you know, something to be said for that approach of let's just try everything. But when you're trying to evaluate a particular policy, then you're trying to think about, well, what are we trying to do here? And these payments conserve some of those ends but not necessarily all of those ends.
J.R. Whelan
Now the topic of limits on state and local tax deductions is still being put on the table. What's the status of that?
Richard Rubin
Yeah, that's not gonna happen. That was in the bill that passed the House and Democrats really favor it, but Republicans have are sort of vociferously against that. And so you may see some compromise on some other things, but that's certainly something that is not attracting a lot of support among Republicans.
J.R. Whelan
All right. That's Wall Street Journal tax reporter Richard Rubin. Richard, thanks for coming on the show.
Richard Rubin
Yep. Thank you.
J.R. Whelan
And that's your money briefing. I'm J.R. whelan for the Wall Street
Deel Representative
Journal deal replaces fragmented payroll vendors with one Global system. No third parties, hire, manage and pay teams in 150 plus countries. Operate like a local everywhere. Visit d e l.com WSJ.
Date: May 19, 2020
Host: J.R. Whelan
Guest: Richard Rubin, Wall Street Journal Tax Reporter
This episode delves into the debate over a potential second round of stimulus payments in response to the ongoing economic impact of COVID-19. Host J.R. Whelan and WSJ tax reporter Richard Rubin break down where negotiations stand on Capitol Hill, the key differences in the latest House-proposed stimulus bill, and the political and economic implications of additional direct payments to Americans.
“A chunk of the money would go toward helping Americans pay their bills, but the GOP feels those payments could actually slow down a recovery.”
— J.R. Whelan (00:37)
“…they're really trying to tie additional aid to work, whether it's incentives for companies to keep paying people as they have reduced hours or hiring bonuses...”
— Richard Rubin (00:56)
“If there's another round, that's really a signal from Congress that they think we're in for a much longer haul of recession and recovery here... It's almost sort of an indicator of where the political mood is about the economy.”
— Richard Rubin (01:57)
“This next round would be in all, maybe 400 and some billion as opposed to about 300 billion from the previous round. So that's a pretty significant jump...”
— Richard Rubin (03:33)
“…those changes to allow adult dependents and college students, those changes in eligibility would be retroactive.”
— Richard Rubin (04:10)
“Yeah, it's really about trying to figure out what it is that Congress is trying to do... Congress, you know, so far has really tried to do all of that.”
— Richard Rubin (04:39)
“That's not gonna happen... That's certainly something that is not attracting a lot of support among Republicans.”
— Richard Rubin (05:14)
“It would have 1,200 per child as opposed to 500 per child. And it also allows those dependent payments to go for college students and adult dependents...”
— Richard Rubin (03:33)
“When you're trying to evaluate a particular policy, then you're trying to think about, well, what are we trying to do here? And these payments can serve some of those ends but not necessarily all of those ends.”
— Richard Rubin (04:39)
In this episode, J.R. Whelan and Richard Rubin provide a thorough update on the debate over a second wave of stimulus payments. Listeners learn how the political and economic landscape—along with intricate policy shifts—affect the likelihood, design, and timing of more direct payments. Rubin’s analysis highlights not only the divisions within Congress but also the evolving understanding of federal aid's purpose during an unprecedented crisis.