You Made It Weird with Pete Holmes
Episode: We Made It Weird #195
Date: October 11, 2024
Host: Pete Holmes
Guest: Valerie Chaney (Pete’s wife)
Theme: Exploring AI-generated podcasts, human weirdness, and the nature of real vs. artificial creativity
Episode Overview
This special episode dives into a unique experiment: Pete and Valerie listen to and dissect an AI-generated podcast that was built using the transcript of their own previous episode. They reflect on the uncanny similarities, discuss what makes something feel “human,” and explore the broader implications of AI creations. Along the way, they meander (in classic We Made It Weird fashion) through body weirdness, coffee hacks, and the future of media and connection.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Recording in a Hotel: “The Throat is the Dune Worm”
[06:30-09:25]
- Pete and Valerie open with quirky banter about physical weirdness; their throats feel like “Dune creatures.”
- Pete reflects on how we often dissociate from our “gross” physical bodies and tend to identify with our brains instead.
- Pete: “Maybe we’re not our bodies. Maybe we’re meaning… even if you don’t look at that as a soul or something spiritual, we’re the awareness, we’re consciousness, and we have these bodies.”
- Valerie suggests our minds shame our bodies, resulting in discomfort with physical “grossness”—even things as basic as a throat gurgle during stand-up.
2. Coffee Deep-Dive: The “Long Shot” Hack
[11:16-17:41]
- Pete shares his “coffee hack” for espresso-lovers: ordering a “long shot” at Starbucks to get a longer, more satisfying espresso with the same number of shots.
- Pete: “If you are like me, and for years, you searched for a way to get more espresso without ordering four shots… just ask for a double espresso, long shot… shaboopi.” [13:12]
- Discussion of the technical aspects of making espresso (timing, grind, etc.)
- Lighthearted back-and-forth about baristas judging customer coffee requests.
3. Introducing the AI Podcast Experiment
[17:41-24:06]
- Valerie introduces a continuation from last week’s “Cereal Soda AI” discussion: Pete’s brother-in-law used Google’s Notebook LM to generate a new podcast from their transcript.
- Pete: “It can make a podcast! And he sent it to us...” [22:13]
- They express fascination at the potential: imagine uploading a dense book and getting a lively conversational summary.
4. Playing the AI-Generated Podcast
[24:06-38:12]
- Pete and Valerie listen to the AI podcast that rehashes their “cereal and soda pairings” bit.
- Both are struck and unnerved by the rhythm and “musicality” of the AI hosts, noting it closely mirrors their own cadence.
- Valerie: “Are they reproducing our specific, specific rhythm?” [25:06]
- AI invents smart phrases (“soulmate sodas,” “yours for the tasting”) and picks up on their themes, even extrapolating new associations.
- Pete (impressed): “Hats off. I’m giving you a standing ovation. I can’t believe it’s not on the front page of the New York Times. It’s insane.” [29:02]
- They note slight “offs”—the hosts never interrupt each other, or sound like they’re reading a script, making it feel subtly artificial.
- Both are struck and unnerved by the rhythm and “musicality” of the AI hosts, noting it closely mirrors their own cadence.
5. What Makes Humans Different?
[38:12-49:05]
- Pete and Valerie explore the human qualities lost when AI takes over creative or connective tasks.
- Pete likens artistic creation to an “everyday ceremony” where meaning, process, and imperfection matter.
- Valerie suggests the enduring appeal of real human connection in the content people seek.
- They muse on the possibility that AI broadcasts might become so ubiquitous that “live” performance art, mistakes, and flaws will become more precious.
6. The Future of AI Media and Connection
[49:05-67:02]
- Pete posits that people don’t just consume content; they’re drawn to the real relationships and unfiltered moments—e.g., listeners are interested in his and Valerie’s moods, their dynamic, and “realness.”
- Pete: “The big appeal… is that they know we’re in a real relationship, and they’re getting a glimpse into what an actual real relationship looks like.” [50:39]
- Valerie anticipates that while AI can supplement human experiences—such as tutoring or mental health support—it can’t replace the deep human need for in-person, energetic connection.
- Valerie: “We crave human connection. That’s what we live for.”
- Both predict a future where hyper-personalized AI “portals” provide a perfect stream of content tailored to every whim, but agree that this will bring its own emptiness, increasing the value of authenticity.
- Pete: “Getting everything you want isn’t the answer… we’ll realize we’ve just been wanting each other all along.” [63:21 & 61:29]
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
-
On AI's mimicry and rhythm:
- Valerie ([25:06]): “Are they reproducing our specific, specific rhythm?”
- Pete ([24:18]): “If she said yes a little faster or a little slower, it would have been wrong. But they’re sharing a musicality that you and I are also sharing.”
-
On losing creative process:
- Pete ([49:11]): “What’s being lost there isn’t just the job… It was their ceremony. It was their… the way that they participated with their imaginations and their consciousness and their heart… That whole process… was how they experienced their own divinity…”
-
On real vs. AI-created media:
- Valerie ([58:16]): “If we found out that [the premise of] ‘My Dad Wrote a Porno’ wasn’t true… we would not care about it. We care that it’s this actual guy’s dad…”
-
On the paradox of digital abundance:
- Pete ([63:00]): “We’re given everything we want… And you go like, this wasn’t the answer.”
-
On the holy dissatisfaction of human life:
- Pete ([66:12]): “There’s that George Carlin joke… here we are [in paradise]… and then Adam goes, ‘Yeah, it’s just not enough, is it?’ That’s the holy dissatisfaction…”
Timestamps for Important Segments
- [06:30] – Start of body-weirdness banter
- [11:16] – Pete’s “long shot” coffee hack explained
- [17:41] – AI-generated podcast experiment introduced
- [24:06] – Playing and reacting to the AI podcast
- [29:02] – Pete’s awe at the AI’s sophistication
- [33:18] – AI-generated diner breakfast insight (Frosted Flakes and Coke)
- [38:12] – Reflection on what gets lost when AI takes over creative jobs
- [49:05] – Human connection and performing “realness”
- [61:29] – Valerie’s “Jim Carrey point” on realizing digital abundance isn’t satisfying
- [66:12] – Pete’s philosophical takeaway on “holy dissatisfaction”
- [67:17] – AI podcast closing (“The answers, my friend, are yours for the tasting”)
Highlights: Playful, Philosophical, and Deeply “Weird”
- The whole episode is suffused with awe and disquiet about how easily the AI can mimic their podcasting style, humor, and tone.
- Pete marvels at the implications for education, creativity, and the outsourcing of meaning-making to machines.
- Valerie maintains optimism, believing nothing replaces real connection; if anything, AI may underline why human presence and process are so important.
- The episode closes with the AI podcast offering a surprisingly poetic outro—prompting one more round of admiration and existential weirdness.
Final Thoughts
Pete and Valerie’s experiment is both hilarious and profound, as they examine what makes their “weirdness” truly human, and why that matters as AI increasingly closes the gap between the authentic and the artificial. Their conclusion: technology may get “weird,” but actual connection, flaws, and lived experience are irreplaceable.
Closing Quote
"Getting everything you want isn’t the answer… what we’ll realize is that we’ve just been wanting each other all along.”
—Valerie ([61:29])
Last word (AI-generated):
“The answers, my friend, are yours for the tasting.”
—[67:36]
