YOUR WELCOME with Michael Malice
Episode #407: Peter Boghossian
Date: March 18, 2026
Host: Michael Malice
Guest: Peter Boghossian

Episode Overview

In this episode, Michael Malice welcomes philosopher and author Peter Boghossian for a wide-ranging, fast-paced discussion on the state of modern discourse, the tension between truth and utility in human motivation, the dangers (and seductions) of social media, and the complexities of ideology—from geopolitics to interpersonal relationships. True to form, Malice’s sharp wit and dry humor guide a candid and often provocative exchange about human nature, belief, narrative, and the modern information landscape.

Key Discussion Points & Insights

The Iranian Crisis & U.S. Foreign Policy

[00:48–09:18]

• Malice, recovering from food poisoning, opens with his concern about the U.S. and Israel bombing Iran, feeling both hope for Iranians and anxiety over the region’s instability.
• Boghossian highlights Western leftist factions who, he claims, paradoxically side with Iran’s religious authorities against their own liberal values:

  “They have some bizarre support of these pre-medieval religious maniacs.” (Boghossian, 03:22)

• Both hosts express skepticism toward U.S. foreign policy, highlighting historical betrayals of local populations (e.g., Kurds, Afghans) and lack of exit strategies:

  “US Foreign policy has often been extremely cynical behind the scenes.” (Malice, 03:57)

• Concern over “regime change” fallout—regimes can always get worse, not better. Malice laments the unpredictability and cruelty of international interventions.
• Both agree on personal admiration for Iranian-Americans, noting their high education and civic contribution.
• Boghossian jokes about his inability to offer expert commentary:

  “I just don’t think anybody should listen to anything I have to say on it.” (Boghossian, 08:25)

• Humorous exchange on voicing opinions as non-experts.

  Malice: “Well, that's going to be kind of tricky for this podcast.” (09:18)

Why We Listen to Unqualified Opinions

[09:44–13:43]

• Discussion turns to why figures like Greta Thunberg and Cenk Uygur command attention—Malice argues people follow political figures as tribal signifiers, akin to sports teams.
• Boghossian warns that even criticism amplifies unworthy voices:

  “Every criticism you make, you’re just making that person’s platform grow. So why would you do that?” (Boghossian, 10:11)

• The anatomy of political fandom is dissected—most people don their favorite identity “merch” not for truth, but for social belonging.

Human Beings: Truth-Seekers or Narrative-Seekers?

[12:12–35:24]

• Boghossian wants to believe that, at our core, people want to know what’s true:

  “Aristotle’s metaphysics… all people desire to know.” (Boghossian, 17:30)

• Malice strenuously disagrees, arguing most people avoid truths that disrupt comfort:

  “People desperately want to avoid knowing what’s true. They want to know what is of utility for them…” (Malice, 17:52)

• Lively analogies ensue (e.g., the “did I turn off the stove?” scenario and the classic “Does this dress make me look fat?” dilemma), with both hosts using personal and psychological examples to probe the human aversion to uncomfortable truth.
• The discussion references real-life situations—post-Stasi East Germany (“the File”)—where people deliberately avoided painful knowledge:

  “Every single former East German had to ask themselves, do I want to know who was reporting on me?” (Malice, 29:51)

• Malice admits he might choose ignorance to avoid trauma; Boghossian stresses his drive to know the full truth, even if it means ending relationships:

  “I just would want to know. I would want to know as much as I can.” (Boghossian, 33:20)

• Both explore how social context, trauma, or repression shapes whether we seek or avoid knowledge.

Social Media, Attention Economy, and the Flattery Machine

[36:15–45:13]

• Malice notes post-COVID changes: people now “need” agitation, and social media companies exploit this for engagement:

  “You got to get people riled up…that is what feeds the algorithm.” (Malice, 37:06)

• Boghossian highlights how AI and recommendation systems flatter and validate users, keeping us hooked:

  “It’s just a flattery machine. And I see it—even though I put [Grok] in a prompt ‘don’t flatter me’, it still flatters me. But you know, we want to be flattered…” (Boghossian, 43:50)

• The hosts express deep concern about the implications when AI can know users better than they know themselves and personalize manipulative feedback.
• Humorous, dark solution:

  Malice (jokingly): “Kill everyone. Now.” (40:44)

Radical Honesty, Framing, and Building True Relationships

[45:13–49:24]

• Boghossian extols the virtues of being utterly forthright, especially in close relationships:

  “Start being utterly forthright in your speech. And the consequence of that is: you will—or they’ll kick themselves to the curb. Your relationships will be better, higher quality, far more honest, more loving, more wholesome.” (45:01)

• Malice co-signs this advice, noting that deep honesty forges life-long supportive networks, even if it’s socially costly in youth or early jobs.
• On “framing”—differences in how truths are presented and received—Boghossian suggests it’s key to understanding why two people can interpret the same facts differently.

How to Have ‘Impossible Conversations’ in an Age of Polarization

[56:23–69:45]

• Malice observes that certain public topics (e.g., Epstein, Trump) are now “impossible conversations”: even a minor disagreement is seen as monstrous.
• Boghossian agrees but notes that, paradoxically, some formerly-taboo subjects are becoming more discussible.
• Condensing his book’s advice:

  “Listen to, understand…Once you hear somebody or you think you hear someone, repeat back to them what you thought you heard…what you’re looking for them is to say ‘yes’ or especially ‘that’s right’.” (Boghossian, 59:24)

• He emphasizes curiosity over empathy: “All you need to do is have a curiosity about why someone believes something.”
• Key practical question:

  “What would it take to change your mind on that?” (Boghossian, 61:00)

• Both stress the importance of steelmanning others’ points, celebrating “I don’t know” as an honest answer.

The Utility of Belief and the Role of Religion

[69:06–72:15]

• Malice raises the argument that, regardless of truth, religion can make people better—shouldn’t this pragmatic benefit matter?
• Boghossian admits that some people “need certain narratives and stories and if they don’t have them, they go to crazy town,” distinguishing between benign and malignant delusions.
• Both agree that society is better off with “benign delusions” if the alternative is more destructive ideology.

• “It’s far better off for society if people hold benign delusions than if they hold malevolent delusions.” (Boghossian, 71:58)

When Contradiction Isn’t a Bug but a Feature

[73:53–76:49]

• Malice notes how public figures’ identities are selectively framed for political convenience (e.g. Bill Clinton as the “first black president” vs. Clarence Thomas “not really black”).
• Boghossian asserts:

  “The only reason that you and I think that this is a problem is because we buy into certain first principles, like we buy into the principle of noncontradiction.” (Boghossian, 73:53)

• Malice:

  “They use language to manipulate, not to communicate.” (74:25)

• Boghossian relates how some ideological actors want not only their freedom, but dominance—citing a point from Faisal al Mutar.

Final Reflections

[77:09–77:40]

• Boghossian’s favorite part of the exchange?

  “Seeing how you processed my making arguments for your case against my own position.” (77:09)

• Malice: “You are welcome.” (77:27)

Notable Quotes & Moments

• On Western activism for Iran:

  “They have some bizarre support of these pre-medieval religious maniacs.” (Boghossian, 03:22)

• On narrative over truth:

  “I don’t think human beings are truth seeking animals. I think they are narrative seeking animals.” (Malice, 12:12)

• On amplifying fools:

  “Every criticism you make, you’re just making that person's platform grow.” (Boghossian, 10:11)

• On Stasi files and difficult truths:

  “Every single former East German had to ask themselves, do I want to know what they had on me? And do I want to know who was reporting on me?” (Malice, 29:51)

• On forthrightness in relationships:

  “Start being utterly forthright in your speech…Your relationships will be better, higher quality, far more honest, more loving.” (Boghossian, 45:01)

• On the role of framing:

  “The way that we frame truth is very important. The way we frame statements and how people interpret those.” (Boghossian, 48:15)

• On the impossibility of some conversations:

  “It seems that the conversation literally is impossible because if you disagree in any way, you’re actually a child toucher.” (Malice, 57:22)

• Advice for better conversations:

  “Listen to, understand…repeat back to them…What would it take to change your mind on that?” (Boghossian, 59:24/61:00)

• On the utility of religious belief:

  “It’s far better off for society if people hold benign delusions than if they hold malevolent delusions.” (Boghossian, 71:58)

• On contradiction in activist discourse:

  “They use language to manipulate, not to communicate.” (Malice, 74:25)

Timestamps for Key Segments

• Iran & U.S. Foreign Policy: 00:48–09:18
• Tribalism & Political Voices: 09:44–13:43
• Truth vs. Utility in Human Motivation: 12:12–35:24
• Social Media & Flattery Machine: 36:15–45:13
• Radical Honesty & Framing: 45:13–49:24
• Impossible Conversations & Techniques: 56:23–69:45
• Religion’s Utility & Delusion: 69:06–72:15
• Contradiction & Manipulation in Discourse: 73:53–76:49
• Episode Wrap & Reflections: 77:09–77:40

Tone and Flow

The episode seamlessly entwines intellectual humility, philosophical inquiry, and dark, sometimes acerbic humor. Malice’s skepticism and sardonic style are balanced by Boghossian’s philosopher’s earnestness and willingness to argue against himself. The conversation, while wide-ranging, stays tightly focused on the challenge of meaning-making (and meaning-distortion) in the modern world.

For New Listeners

If you haven’t tuned in, this episode offers a masterclass in philosophical sparring, debunking comforting illusions, and practical advice for surviving and thriving in a culture defined by noise, narrative, and rapidly shifting truths. Expect both rigorous argument and biting wit.