Transcript
Michael Malice (0:00)
Why have I asked my H Vac
Commercial Announcer (0:01)
guy I found on angie.com to change my grandpa's trachea tube? I was so amazed at how he replaced our air ducts, I knew I could trust him to change Pop Pop's tube.
Dr. Charles Cornish Dale (0:09)
I think we should call a Dr. Angie.
Michael Malice (0:11)
The one you trust to find the ones you trust. Find pros for all your home projects@angie.com
Progressive Insurance Announcer (0:17)
this episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Do you ever find yourself playing the budgeting game? Well, with a name your price tool from Progressive you you can find options that fit your budget and potentially lower your bills. Try it@progressive.com, progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Price and coverage match limited by state law. Not available in all states.
Michael Malice (1:07)
Good afternoon. Michael Malice here. Let that be your welcome for the next hour. This is going to be a fun one because we have a guest on the show, one perhaps the first guest in your welcome history who's more of a smug twat than me. That is like climbing Everest. We have with us a very fun young man by the. This is his real name, Dr. Charles Cornish Dale. You probably know him better as Raw Egg Nationalist. You're one of the biggest voices in the online. I hate the term manosphere because I feel it's it, it's like speaks to like people telling 12 year olds how to pick up girls, but people who discuss masculinity and intersection. Masculinity, politics and culture. I think that's fair to say. Rog Nationalist is your online hand that people know you more as your last book is called the Last Men, Liberalism and the Death of Masculinity. You were here in Austin. We had such a fun time shooting the shit. I don't even know where to start because. Let's talk a bit about your book because I feel like discussing masculinity in a right of center space. There's so many mousetraps people have in their heads because they have this binary right good, left bad. I think a lot of things that are regarded as masculine traits are being promoted very heavily by leftists nowadays. Specifically aggression, destruction of your enemy, domination. All these so called toxic masculine traits they have no problem promoting and endorsing and using. But please tell people the premise of your book and why they should pick it up.
Dr. Charles Cornish Dale (2:48)
Well, listen, actually you know that's, That's a, it's an interesting point though that you make actually about the left being extremely aggressive, focused on destroying their enemy. I mean that's, it's very easy actually to fall into the Trap of presenting the left as this kind of pathetic, weak spectacle, you know, like, oh, this. They're so stupid. You know, they believe all these silly things. Like, I mean, they're, they're extremely aggressive, they're extremely determined, and there's every chance that they're going to win simply, simply through, I think, understanding that actually at a kind of base level, like politics is about, you know, identifying your enemies and destroying them. And they do it very, very well. They do it a lot better. They embody those kind of masculine archetypes, virtues, attributes, whatever you want to call them, a lot better than people on the right do. And, you know, I think it probably behooves the right actually to recognize that they need to get a little bit more serious actually, about not infighting and actually, you know, destroying their enemies. But the book. So the book, the Last Men, Liberalism and the Death of Masculinity is a follow on from a Tucker Carlson documentary that I was in in 2022. So it was called the End of Men. And you may remember this, and your, your viewers may remember this. It generated a real stink in 2022. There was a trailer that featured a man sunning his testicles in the vitruvian, you know, the Vitruvian man pose atop a rock. And people like Joy Behar and George Takei and Chenk Uyghur and all these Stephen Colbert and all these kind of liberal commentators were losing their. For about five minutes anyway. But the documentary was about testosterone decline and the political implications of testosterone decline. You know, what that might actually mean for politics and society if testosterone levels are decreasing, which they are on a kind of civilizational scale at quite a worrying rate. So the book really is a follow on from that. It's about, it's an intervention in the kind of big crisis of masculinity literature, you know, so you've got. Jordan Peterson is probably the, is probably the most well known and maybe one of the most benign kind of writers in that sphere. What's wrong with young men today? Why aren't young men doing what they should be doing? Why aren't young men growing up and going out and living fulfilling lives and, you know, having families and reproducing and contributing and kind of being upstanding members of their community, whatever. But in all of this, in all of the kind of literature, Jordan Peterson even nobody talks about testosterone. It's very strange. It's a weird thing, actually. You can go to the index of any one of these books, Jordan Peterson's book, Richard Reeves Book of Boys and Men and you'll basically find no mention of testosterone, which is actually the master male hormone. Right. It's simplistic to say that men are testosterone, but testosterone governs masculine development, masculine behavior, masculine attributes in a way that doesn't seem to be appreciated. And the fact that it's declining on a civilizational scale, 1%, year on year, for decades this has been happening. And you know, that might not sound like a lot, but, you know, you're losing 1% a year for 25 years. Well, that's a quarter, 50 years. It's half. You know, you can very easily extrapolate out the data and ask whether, you know, at some, some point in the future, men, men are going to have testostero all. But no, nobody seems to talk about it. And so my book really is an attempt to reframe the problem as a biological problem and actually to ask some unsettling questions about whether liberalism itself is a low testosterone political system, which actually I think it. I think it is in many respects.
