Zero to Well-Read – "Hamnet" by Maggie O’Farrell

Podcast: Zero to Well-Read
Hosts: Jeff O’Neal & Rebecca Schinsky
Episode: "Hamnet" by Maggie O’Farrell
Date: December 9, 2025

Episode Overview

This episode delves into Hamnet by Maggie O’Farrell, a much-lauded novel that reimagines the domestic life and private grief of William Shakespeare’s family, specifically centering his wife (Agnes/Anne Hathaway) and the loss of their son, Hamnet, whose death possibly inspired Hamlet. With the film adaptation’s imminent release, Jeff and Rebecca present an engaging deep dive into the book’s historical mysteries, imaginative leaps, lush prose, and its exploration of marriage, art, parenthood, and grief.

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Historical Premise and Imaginative Focus

• Hamnet is set between 1596 and 1599, investigating the little-documented domestic life of Shakespeare, centering his wife (Agnes) and their children.
• The novel’s launching point is the historical fact that Shakespeare’s son Hamnet died at age 11, supposedly of plague, just before Hamlet was written. Few hard facts are known about Shakespeare’s private life, opening “rich space for...imagination” (Rebecca, 04:57).
• O’Farrell departs from centuries-old assumptions about Shakespeare’s marriage being estranged or loveless, instead portraying a complex, mature, and loving partnership.

2. Giving Agnes/Anne Hathaway Her Due

• O’Farrell draws on the historical tidbit that Shakespeare’s wife was referred to as "Agnes" in her father’s will (06:01).
• Agnes is depicted as intuitive, possibly mystical, deeply connected to nature, and “fully formed, like a real human woman” who had long been sidelined in stories of Shakespeare (06:01).
• The book offers “best in class” writing for the historical-fiction subgenre focusing on under-acknowledged women, elevating it beyond “beach read” territory (20:37).

3. Themes: Art, Grief, and the Limits of History

• The novel considers how silence and gaps in historical records create “spaces for imagining” (09:59).
• O’Farrell, herself a parent of a child with a severe allergy, intimately engages with grief, loss, and the suddenness of a child’s death in a time when such tragedies were common, yet devastating (11:12).
• A recurring motif: How and why artists metabolize pain—Shakespeare processing his son’s death through art (“art is the closest thing we have to real magic”—Jeff, 35:21).

4. De-centering Shakespeare

• Shakespeare is never named, always referred to by relation—“the husband, the father, the son”—to decouple his myth from historical and masculine centrality (12:17).
• The novel’s perspective is split among characters, but rarely lingers in Shakespeare’s interiority. This “humanizes him” more than traditional portrayals, showing him as “just a guy” (13:52).

Notable Quote:

“This is the most just-a-guy Shakespeare you’ll ever see. And somehow he’s more Titanic because of it.”
— Jeff (15:09)

5. Subtlety of the Plague

• Despite its subtitle, Hamnet is not a dense "novel of the plague"; the actual epidemic appears mostly in the background, driving the family’s tragedy but not monopolizing the narrative (32:08).
• Plague is depicted both as ever-present threat and random chaos—a powerful chapter imagines the flea’s journey to Judith, Hamnet’s twin sister (37:31).

Notable Quote:

“If Hamnet had been kicked by a horse and died, you could write the same book.”
— Jeff (34:02)

6. Structure, Prose, and “Sanctified” Tone

• The book’s lush, enveloping descriptions alternate between elemental earthiness and almost magical realism, especially via Agnes’s perspective.
• Pacing and language shift with emotional urgency—“she lightens the load by how lush the world is and how beautiful the writing is” (18:06).
• The hosts emphasize how reading the novel feels “intimate and sacred” (26:48), drawing the reader into a space apart from daily life.

7. Connection to Shakespeare’s Works

• While the book draws thematic parallels with Hamlet (loss, grief, ghosts), it resists suggesting a direct, literal causal link between Hamnet’s death and the play—more fable than historical footnote (70:26).
• Many “Easter egg” moments for Shakespeare fans, including the detail that Shakespeare himself played the Ghost in Hamlet’s first staging (25:57, 68:51).

8. Critical Reception & Book Club Popularity

• Hamnet was a “hit right away,” winning major prizes and achieving high popularity despite heavy subject matter (17:18).
• Its success with book clubs surprises the hosts, given its emotional difficulty (18:06, 42:45).
• The film adaptation leads to speculation about “grief porn,” but the hosts strongly defend the story as avoiding gratuitousness, focusing instead on realism and insight (47:03-48:04).

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On Shakespeare’s Absence:

  “Shakespeare is never referred to by name... She’s trying to take us outside of all that cultural weight.”
  — Rebecca (12:17)

• On the Book’s Structure:

  “Hamnet opens with this 11-year-old just walking through his world... and you gently walk into the world, right? You sort of—it opens up through his eyes.”
  — Jeff (24:50)

• On Art and Grief:

  “Shakespeare is using art to conjure, right, in the way that he can, in the way that art is the closest thing we have to real magic.”
  — Jeff (35:21)

• On Reading Experience:

  “You don’t want to get the plague, but you kind of do want to live in this world that she’s created.”
  — Rebecca (55:45)

• On the Book’s Emotional Core:

  “Every life has its kernel, its hub, its epicenter, from which everything flows out, to which everything returns. This moment is the absent mothers, the boy, the empty house, the deserted yard, the unheard cry.”
  — Rebecca, reading from Hamnet (51:09)

Timestamps for Important Segments

• [03:02] — The historical setup: Shakespeare, Hamnet, and the genesis of Hamlet
• [06:01] — Agnes’s role and O’Farrell’s approach to reclaiming her
• [11:12] — O’Farrell’s personal connection to themes of sudden child loss
• [12:17] — Shakespeare’s anonymity in the novel and its effect
• [18:06] — Book club popularity and discussion of the book’s emotional pull
• [24:50] — Opening scenes and prose style compared to Hamlet the play
• [32:08] — The “plaguiness” of the novel—how central is the epidemic?
• [35:21] — The climactic revelation: art as conjuring, grief, and the last 15 pages
• [42:45] — Speculation on book club experiences and reader reactions
• [47:03] — Addressing accusations of “grief porn” and dealing with difficult material
• [51:09] — Notable, moving quotes on grief from the text
• [57:51] — Who is this book for, and who might struggle with it?
• [74:20] — Takeaways and “what to tell someone at a dinner party” about the book

Takeaways and Key Insights

• Hamnet is less a plague novel and more a portrait of grief, womanhood, marriage, and the mysterious mechanics of art.
• O’Farrell crafts a deeply immersive and emotionally honest picture of Shakespeare’s domestic life—intentionally shrouded in ambiguity, prioritizing what could have been over what history proves.
• The book’s central question: How do we metabolize grief, and what does art offer in the face of unimaginable loss?
• Its strength lies in its luminous prose, structural inventiveness, and willingness to dwell in the spaces of not-knowing as much as fact.

Book Statistics & Readability Scores (77:00)

• Historical Importance: 3/10 (“the jury’s out” but may climb over time, especially if the film is big)
• Readability: 8/10 (“emotionally difficult, but the writing itself is inviting and beautiful”)
• Relevance of Central Questions: 10/10 (“what do we do with grief?”—timeless, universal)
• Book Nerd Cred: 5/10 (“widely known, not a deep-cut, but not yet a ‘must’”)
• ‘Oh Damn’ Factor: 8/10 (especially for the structurally stunning final section)

Who This Book is For (& Not For)

For you if:

• You love lushly written character studies focusing on interior lives
• You enjoy literary historical fiction, especially about famous figures’ untold stories
• You’re drawn to themes of art-making, family, grief, and strong women characters
• You appreciate books that imagine possibilities over historicity

Not for you if:

• Loss of a child or depictions of sudden death are personally triggering (explicit warnings given)
• You prefer fact-driven, highly accurate historical fiction
• You want action-packed or plot-driven storytelling

Read-Alikes & Further Reading (72:02)

• Lincoln in the Bardo by George Saunders (fictional approach to grief, Abraham Lincoln)
• The Year of Magical Thinking by Joan Didion (nonfiction meditation on grief)
• Instructions for a Heatwave by Maggie O’Farrell (contemporary family drama)
• Girl with a Pearl Earring by Tracy Chevalier (focusing on a woman near a great artist)
• Shakespeare’s Sisters by Raymy Targoff (women writers in the Renaissance)
• James by Percival Everett (retelling of Huckleberry Finn from Jim’s view)

Stray Thoughts & Fun Facts

• The book’s title creates a tantalizing “curiosity gap,” driving interest even before reading (43:35).
• Agnes’s almost-the-supernatural healing talents walk a line between folklore and realism.
• The hosts debate the “grief porn” label, ultimately agreeing that Hamnet is far too layered and humane for such a reductive take (48:04).
• The elasticity of Elizabethan spelling (e.g., “Hamnet” vs. “Hamlet”; “Agnes” vs. “Anne”) makes etymological direct links fuzzier than popular myth assumes (71:04).

Memorable Final Takeaway

“It’s most helpful to think of this as a fable... Rather than ‘Could it have happened or not?’ It’s a what if—an alternate part of something. I don’t think it’s helpful to try to like Asa Pruder film it... I’m so uninterested in that.”
—Jeff (75:09)

For Dinner Parties (Three Key Notes)

• Hamnet is about Shakespeare’s real son, Hamnet, who died young, and how that loss may have echoed in the creation of Hamlet—but it’s told mostly from the wife’s neglected point of view.
• Its subtitle, “a novel of the plague,” is misleading—the story is really about grief, family, and imagination, not just pandemic tragedy.
• The writing is lush, intimate, and immersive—less about facts, more about emotional truth and the possibility that art transforms pain.

Email your book club experiences or reactions to the film at zerotowellread@bookriot.com
Show notes available at Book Riot

End of Summary