
A deadly desert crossing leaves survivors seeking refuge—and sparks a movement that defied the law and redefined the idea of sanctuary in America. This is the story of how faith, courage, and resistance collided with one of the biggest immigration battles in modern history.
Loading summary
John Fife
What does it mean to be rich? Is it having more stories to share or time to give? Is it being able to keep your loved ones close or travel somewhere far away? At Edward Jones we believe the key to being rich is knowing what counts. Your dedicated financial advisor will take a comprehensive approach to your financial strategy to help support what truly matters to you. Edwardjones.com FindYourRich Edward Jones Member, SIPC this.
Roman Mars
Episode is brought to you by Progressive.
Delaney Hall
Where drivers who save by switching save nearly $750 on average. Plus auto customers qualify for an average of 7 discounts. Quote now@progressive.com to see if you could save. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates national average 12 month savings of $744 by new customer survey who saved with Progressive between June 2022 and May 2023. Potential savings will vary. Discounts not available in all states and situations. This is 99% invisible. I'm Roman Mars. This week, Donald Trump returns to the White House, and he's promised on day one to begin carrying out the largest domestic deportation operation in American history. Trump plans to mobilize federal and local law enforcement to remove millions of undocumented immigrants from the country. But already he's facing pushback from cities and states across the country that have declared themselves sanctuaries and say they won't cooperate. This is a fight we've had many times before. And back in 2017, during Trump's first term, we aired a two part series exploring the origins of the sanctuary movement. We thought this would be a good week to revisit that story. Here it is.
Roman Mars
In July 1980, a group of Salvadoran migrants crossed the border from Mexico into Arizona. They walked over an isolated mountain range and halfway across a wide desert valley. There were more than two dozen of them, people who'd left behind lives and jobs to come to the United States.
John Fife
They'd hired some guides to lead them on the journey.
Roman Mars
Reporting our story this week is Delaney Hall.
John Fife
And those guides had brought them to a largely uninhabited part of the border. It was a vast, empty and fatally hot stretch of the Somoran desert.
Jim Corbett
The temperature the next day got up to around 112, 115 degrees out there. It was deadly.
John Fife
This is John Fife. He's a Presbyterian minister from Tucson, which is a couple of hours from where the migrants crossed.
Jim Corbett
They were in the middle of the most desolate and deadly area of the desert. And I think out of the group of 26, 12 of them died the first day out.
John Fife
The survivors were eventually found delirious and suffering from intense dehydration and heat stroke. Some of them had stripped off their clothes. Border patrol agents brought them to a hospital in Tucson, which is where reverend John fife met them.
Jim Corbett
And they asked some of us who were pastors to provide some pastoral care for the survivors who were traumatized beyond understanding. And they began to tell me why they'd fled El Salvador at that point.
Roman Mars
Reverend Fife had lived in Tucson for more than 10 years, leading a small congregation at a church called southside presbyterian.
John Fife
He didn't know much about central America or what was going on in countries like Nicaragua, Guatemala, and El Salvador around this time.
Jim Corbett
Yeah, not only ignorant, but I couldn't have put El Salvador on a map. I knew it was somewhere between Mexico and Panama, but that was the extent of my knowledge. So I had a lot to learn and a lot of catching up to do.
Ruth Ann Meyers
The people of El Salvador are caught in a web of terror, trapped between.
Alan Nelson
The military forces of the arena government and the guerrilla forces of the fmln.
Ruth Ann Meyers
No one is safe in this civil war.
Roman Mars
El Salvador's civil war had been decades in the making. Since the early 1900s, the country had been ruled by a series of oligarchs and corrupt military leaders. They maintained control by repressing large segments of the rural population.
John Fife
In the late 1970s and early 1980s, a number of left wing guerrilla groups began to grow in power and influence. The military responded by trying to crush this resistance. Death squads targeted union leaders, community organizers, and other people they suspected of sympathizing with the guerrillas. That included priests and nuns. Lots of civilians were caught in the middle of this violence. Thousands of people were disappeared, murdered or displaced.
Alan Nelson
Today, the Salvadoran people continue to suffer as a persistent pattern of brutal human rights violations grips the nation.
Roman Mars
And El Salvador wasn't the only country where this was happening. Similar conflicts were unfolding in Nicaragua and Guatemala, where authoritarian governments were facing pressure from left wing rebels.
John Fife
This is the history Reverend John fife started to learn about when he met the salvadoran migrants who'd nearly died in the desert near Tucson.
Jim Corbett
Well, basically, they were telling me why they'd fled El Salvador, about threats from death squads, killings of members of their family or close friends, that sort of thing. And the reason why they'd had to flee.
Roman Mars
He didn't know it then, but Reverend fife was witnessing the beginning of something big. Hundreds of thousands of central Americans were trying to get away from these dangerous and bloody civil wars. They were fleeing their countries, making their way through Mexico and crossing into the United States.
Jim Corbett
So a major migration of refugees Occurred along this border. During that 10 year period beginning in.
Roman Mars
1980, Reverend Fife's church sat less than 100 miles from the border and it would be completely swept up in this crisis. Eventually, fife and his congregants would give shelter to hundreds of central Americans. They'd be joined by a network of churches across the country, all opening their doors and giving migrants a safe place to stay.
John Fife
This would mark the beginning of a new and controversial social movement Based on the old religious concept of sanctuary. The idea that churches have a duty to shelter people fleeing persecut. More than 6,000 people have signed up to provide sanctuary around the country.
Alan Nelson
The today cracks down on so called sanctuary cities.
Delaney Hall
The modern sanctuary movement in the US can trace its roots back to reverend Fife. Today we're going to look at how it began and why it caused one of the biggest showdowns between church and state in recent memory.
John Fife
After that first encounter with the salvadorans at the hospital, Reverend Fife began to see more and more central americans arriving in Tucson. Some of them would come to his church and ask for help. And at first his inclination was to work within the rules of the immigration system.
Jim Corbett
I was pretty naive at that point and I went to the immigration office here in Tucson, Met with the director and said, we're seeing refugees who are fleeing for their lives. What do we need to do to protect them? And he said, well, we have good political asylum law on the books. And if they're deserving of political asylum, if they're refugees, they'll get political asylum.
A. Bates Butler III
Asylum you apply for. If you are within the United States and have a well founded fear of persecution. I'm talking law here.
John Fife
This is Ruth Ann Meyers.
A. Bates Butler III
I was district director of the immigration and naturalization service for Arizona in 1984, and a couple years later, they added Nevada.
Roman Mars
Since 1980, when Congress passed the Refugee act, the US has asked people to meet a number of requirements in order to be granted political asylum. They have to establish that they fear persecution in their home country Based on their race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or social group.
John Fife
They also have to convince immigration that their government is actually involved in their persecution or. Or that it can't control the groups that are. If someone shows up in the US and they can meet those requirements, they're supposed to be able to stay. But it's not always that simple.
Roman Mars
Meyers used to interview people seeking asylum, and she says it could be tough to establish a person's status. It relied heavily on a single individual's testimony about what they'd been through.
A. Bates Butler III
It depends on the individual. It depends on what they say and how they say it and if they have any backing. So basically it was my decision based on my experience and what the person said. Because as you can understand, there was very little physical evidence of this.
Roman Mars
Despite the challenges of qualifying for asylum, Reverend Fife and his church raised some money and organized legal assistance for the migrants. They started visiting detention centers and helping people fill out asylum applications. They arranged for lawyers to represent them in court.
John Fife
But it began to seem like even the people who met the requirements for asylum were not getting it. Like even in cases where there was physical evidence.
Jim Corbett
I can remember taking in a guy who had been tortured in El Salvador. And we flew in an Amnesty International doctor who testified that, yeah, this guy's been tortured. I'm an expert on the physical effects of torture. And the immigration judge would order him deported. The next day.
John Fife
Reverend Fife began to wonder what was behind these decisions.
Roman Mars
To deport Central Americans hoping for asylum faced some significant hurdles. For one thing, just as they began turning up along the U. S. Mexico border in 1980, tens of thousands of refugees from other places like Cuba and Iran were also seeking refuge in the United States. The government was overwhelmed with applications.
John Fife
Most Central Americans had also historically come to the US for jobs, not because of political persecution. The government was more engaged, inclined to see them as economic migrants.
Roman Mars
And on top of that, there was the Cold War.
Ruth Ann Meyers
Mr. Speaker, distinguished members of the Congress, honored guests, and my fellow Americans.
Roman Mars
In 1983, President Ronald Reagan delivered a special televised speech before Congress. In it, he outlined his concerns about the civil wars flaring up in Central America.
Ruth Ann Meyers
Too many have thought of Central America as just that place way down below Mexico that can't possibly constitute a threat.
Alan Nelson
To our well being.
Ruth Ann Meyers
And that's why I've asked for this session. Central America's problems do directly affect the.
Alan Nelson
Security and the well being of our own people.
Roman Mars
Reagan saw Central America is an important front in the Cold War. A region so close to the US that our national security required us to stop communist movements from flourishing there.
Alan Nelson
Nicaragua is just as close to Miami.
Ruth Ann Meyers
San Antonio, San Diego and Tucson as.
Alan Nelson
Those cities are to Washington, where we're gathered tonight.
John Fife
Just a few Years earlier, in 1979, a socialist revolution actually did happen in Nicaragua. The Sandinistas National Liberation Front had ousted a US backed dictatorship which had ruled the country for decades.
Roman Mars
At the time of this speech, the Reagan administration was sending aid to contras fighting the new socialist Sandinista government. And the US was also doing its best to suppress similar left wing movements. In El Salvador and Guatemala, which meant backing the authoritarian governments that still had a grip on power in those countries.
Ruth Ann Meyers
In summation, I say to you that tonight there can be no question the national security of all the Americas is.
Alan Nelson
At stake in central America.
Ruth Ann Meyers
Thank you.
Alan Nelson
God bless you.
John Fife
So here's how this all connects back to Tucson and the deportations that Reverend Fife was seeing. Because the US Government considered the governments of El Salvador and Guatemala to be political allies in the fight against communism, it denied these governments were persecuting their own people.
Roman Mars
Under Reagan, almost all salvadoran and Guatemalan border crossers were classified not as political refugees, but as economic migrants. That meant they didn't qualify for asylum. They got sent back.
John Fife
Ruthanne Meyers, the former INS director in Arizona, says immigration officers followed policy set by the government, which has broad discretion when it comes to asylum decisions.
A. Bates Butler III
The immigration officers, whether it be enforcement or the asylum officers or whatever, were not making up their criteria or the law. This all came from Congress.
John Fife
The result of this policy was stark when it came to salvadorans and Guatemalans. Between 1983 and 1986, fewer than 3% of Salvadorans and Guatemalans who applied for asylum were approved. In that same period, the approval rate for Iranians was 60%. For Afghans fleeing the Soviet invasion, it was close to 40%.
Roman Mars
Back in Tucson, that put Reverend Fife and his congregants in a tough position. They didn't want to encourage migrants to report to immigration when they knew it was almost certain they'd be deported.
John Fife
So they held a series of meetings to figure out what to do. And that's when Jim Corbett started showing up.
Jim Corbett
It's hard to describe Jim, because he was unique figure.
John Fife
Jim Corbett died in 2001. But back in the 80s, he lived on the edge of Tucson. He raised goats, and he knew a lot about philosophy. He was also a quaker. And as the refugee crisis in Tucson continued to grow, Jim's religious faith compelled him to take action. He'd started letting refugees stay at his house and in some of the ramshackle trailers scattered around his property. Property.
Roman Mars
So Jim starts coming to meetings at southside presbyterian church, where they're discussing the deportations. And after one of those meetings, Jim comes up to reverend five.
Jim Corbett
And his contention at that point to me was, john, I don't think we have any choice under the circumstances except to begin to smuggle people safely across the border so that they're not captured and detained and deported. My response was, how the hell do you figure that, Jim? And he explained.
Roman Mars
Jim explained that they needed to consider two moments in history. The first was back in the 1800s, when church people, a lot of them Quakers, helped move runaway slaves across state lines and through the Underground Railroad to safety.
Jim Corbett
And he basically said, we have to conclude from history that they got it right. Those were the folks who understood and got it right.
John Fife
Then Jim pointed to the church and its failure to protect Jewish people fleeing the Holocaust. In the 1930s and 40s, many Jews were detained and deported back to Germany, where they were killed. Jim argued that Christians should have done more to protect them.
Jim Corbett
And he said, they failed. They failed completely as people of faith, as the church. And I said, yeah, you're right. And his punchline was, john, I don't think we can allow that to happen on our border in our time. And after a couple of sleepless nights, I went back to him and said, yeah, you're right. I cannot be a pastor of a church here on the border and not do what you're asking, so sign me up.
Roman Mars
At this point, Jim Corbett had already done some border runs on his own, picking up migrants in Mexico and helping them cross the border into the United States. But now Reverend Fife and a handful of others started helping him. At first, they'd bring people across and put them up at Jim's house, but it quickly became clear they needed more space. So once again, Jim came to talk with Reverend Fife. He wanted the church to start hosting people.
Jim Corbett
That was a question that the whole congregation had to deal with, and that's not an easy choice for people to make.
John Fife
They talked and prayed, and then voted to let Central American refugees stay at the church. Soon, on any given night, the church would have dozens of people sleeping in the main gathering space. Church members would provide food, clothes, English lessons, medical care, and access to legal advice. They'd help the refugees strategize about what to do next. It wasn't as if the migrants were entirely safe. They were still undocumented and faced possible deportation. But they had access to resources, guidance, and a place to stay.
Roman Mars
The congregation at Southside was drawing on a long religious tradition when they decided to take the refugees into their church.
Jim Corbett
It's actually an ancient tradition of temples and churches and synagogues and sacred sites of indigenous peoples that goes back as far as any history we know about.
John Fife
In Greek and Roman history, people who were threatened with persecution could find protection in temples. When the Roman Empire became Christian, churches took on the same function. The concept of sanctuary can also be found in medieval canon law and British common law. And as nation states evolved in Europe, some of Those nations legally recognized the right of churches to shelter people. More recently, churches sheltered conscientious objectors during the Vietnam war.
Roman Mars
But even though Reverend Fife was drawing on a long religious tradition, he and his congregants were still harboring undocumented immigrants who crossed into the country illegally. And as it turns out, the government was keeping an eye on their growing operation.
Jim Corbett
Well, what do we do under those circumstances? And the only conclusion we came to was, well, the only choice we have is to go public with what we're doing.
John Fife
They thought maybe by going public, the church could generate attention and public support. They invited a couple of other churches to join them in a public announcement. And In March of 1982, they hung two huge banners on the front of the church. They said in Spanish, this is a sanctuary of God for the oppressed of Central America and immigration. Do not profane the sanctuary of God.
Roman Mars
They held a service and publicly welcomed a new family from El Salvador to join the other refugees who were staying at the church. And they staged a press conference to explain exactly what the sanctuary movement was and what their goals were.
Jim Corbett
So, yeah, we made some national news.
Alan Nelson
In the American Southwest, the sanctuary movement has become a highly emotional issue. Supporters of that movement, mainly church people, helped refugees from Central. All members of the so called sanctuary movement that offers aid, comfort, and shelter to illegal. About 200 churches across the United States have joined the sanctuary movement, vowing to violate the laws if necessary.
John Fife
As the movement gained visibility, it became more controversial.
Alan Nelson
But the federal government contends conscience is not a good excuse for violating the law.
Roman Mars
Our objection to any such movement is that it takes law into its own hands. You're not afraid. Despite these government objections, the movement continued to grow. More and more churches and synagogues started to get in touch with Reverend Fife.
Jim Corbett
They'd call us and say, can you send us a family? We're going to declare sanctuary.
Roman Mars
A network started to develop, which meant Reverend Fife and Jim Corbett had to figure out how to safely transport refugees across the country to the churches that could support them.
Jim Corbett
And so Jim and I basically sat down here with a map of the United States and said, okay, who do you know in Albuquerque and who do you know in Denver and who do you know across the United States so we could move people. And we literally, in one afternoon, figured out an underground railroad, and we modeled it on the old underground railroad.
Roman Mars
By the mid-1980s, hundreds of churches and synagogues across the country had joined the sanctuary movement. Almost every mainstream church denomination had gotten involved, including Lutherans, Methodists and Baptists. Sanctuary volunteers came from a wide variety of political viewpoints, including conservative. But everyone shared a belief that churches needed to respond to the Central American crisis.
John Fife
These American churches were connected to a network of churches that extended down into Mexico and Central Americ. So migrants could plug into this network and make their way north. Some would find shelter in Mexico. Others would continue into the U.S. that's.
Roman Mars
Exactly what Patricia Barcelo did.
Patricia Barcelo
My name is Patricia Barcelo. I am a refugee from Guatemala, and I have lived in the United States since 1985.
Roman Mars
Patricia grew up in Guatemala City, and her parents were union organizers during the civil war, which made them a target of the government.
Patricia Barcelo
They labeled my dad and my mom as being involved in subversive acts and wanting to overthrow the government. And that was enough for them to kill you, disappear you, or, you know, do whatever they wanted to do to you.
John Fife
At one point, Patricia's dad disappeared for many weeks. He'd been kidnapped by the military or the police. Patricia's family never learned exactly who.
Patricia Barcelo
He came home being the shadow of a man that he was because he was so skinny and, I mean, bony. He had a beard so long, he didn't look anything like my dad. But he made it back. And with him, he read a horrible story of torture and things that had been done to him that were just inhumane.
John Fife
At that point, Patricia's parents fled to Mexico City, leaving Patricia and her sister with their grandmother. Her parents said they'd be in touch when they had a plan. For two years, nothing. And then a letter from her mother.
Patricia Barcelo
And the letter said, you know, bring the girls to the border, bring them to this park in Chiapas, and I will be there waiting.
Roman Mars
Patricia and her sister crossed the border from Guatemala into Mexico and met their mom. And at a designated park, they learned that she'd met some Quakers involved in the sanctuary movement. The Quakers told the family to head to northern Mexico, where they were met by a Catholic priest named Father Ricardo Elford. He worked closely with Reverend Fife.
Patricia Barcelo
He wanted to know what had happened in Guatemala. He wanted to know why we were wanting to come to the U.S. he said, you know, just tell me, you know, what. What went on, because we want to bring you.
Delaney Hall
We.
Patricia Barcelo
We just want to know what we can do for you. And my mom told him everything had happened. Dad did, too. And then he said, everything is going to be okay.
John Fife
Father Alford was vetting the family. He was making sure they qualified as refugees. As the sanctuary network had grown, they'd had to develop a more formalized process. This was Partly to ensure their limited resources went towards helping people who were most in need. It was also to try and ensure they weren't putting volunteers at at risk or bringing someone dangerous into the U.S.
Roman Mars
One of the government's criticisms of the sanctuary movement was that they lacked the expertise and resources to evaluate potential refugees. The government worried they might be helping criminals enter the country, or communists who wanted to undermine the US Government. Here's Reverend Fife again.
Jim Corbett
I would just kind of smile and say, you don't understand the church. We have the best intelligence system in the world. As I understand it, what you say is you have five CIA agents in El Salvador right now. I have thousands. They're called priests and pastors. And all I have to do is pick up the phone and call them, and they'll give me the whole family history.
John Fife
Once Father Alford was satisfied that Patricia and her family actually met the requirements for refugee status, he arranged for them to be brought across the border into.
Patricia Barcelo
The US we got picked up very early in the morning in this yellow truck, and we were thrown in the back right under lots of sleeping bags. And they told us that no matter what, we couldn't pop our heads up. We just had to stay underneath.
Roman Mars
The family crossed into Douglas, Arizona, and then headed to Tucson, where they stayed at St. Michael's Episcopal, another church in town that had declared sanctuary. After living there for six months, they moved into a house and started the long process of applying to stay in the U.S. it took them more than six years of legal wrangling to receive asylum. Patrizia still gets emotional, thinking about what the sanctuary movement did for her and her family.
Patricia Barcelo
I remember my parents talking about this and saying, you know, who would do this? Who would risk their lives, you know, their good lives here in the US for people like us.
John Fife
But as the movement grew bigger and more visible, the whole endeavor became riskier.
Jim Corbett
Well, quite frankly, I never thought we were going to get away with this, right? I mean, the first time I went to the border to do a Crossing, 1981. Sometime I had to get comfortable with the fact that we weren't going to get away with this, that the government was going to come after us, and it was only a matter of time.
Delaney Hall
John was right. It was only a matter of time. And the religious motivations of the sanctuary movement didn't get much sympathy from the government. That's after the break.
John Fife
Foreign.
Delaney Hall
Are you ready to jumpstart your health in 2025? Well, Lumen can help. Lumen is the world's first handheld metabolic coach that measures your metabolism through your breath. All you have to do is breathe into your lumen for insight on what's going on with your metabolic health. The app will let you know if you're burning fat or carbs. It'll even give you tailored guidance to improve your nutrition, workout, sleep and stress management.
Roman Mars
Super easy to use.
Delaney Hall
I just like roll out of beds. First thing I do I breathe into it. I can tell I'm usually like in fat burning mode and it sort of encourages me to fast like a little bit longer so I can stay there. And then I use it throughout the day before and after workouts to see where I am. It just gives you a bunch of information that you can act on to stay on top of everything. Take the next step to improving your health. Go to Lumen Me invisible to get 20% off your lumen. That's L u M E N e invisible for 20% off your purchase. Thank you Lumen for sponsoring this episode. AR believes in delightful design for every home and thanks to their online only model, they have some really delightful prices too. AR's team of designers are all about finding the perfect balance between style, quality and price. Their curated collection features a variety of styles including mid century modern, coastal, industrial, industrial, Scandi and Boho, making furniture shopping easy. And they are committed to creating well crafted pieces that are built to last and look great. I've had The Seno extendable 12 person dining table in my house for like I don't know, 10 years. I'm not even sure and it is the MVP of the house. Joy works at it every day and then for big dinners we clear it off, we put on a fancy runner, we put on flowers, some candles and then we gather everyone around and we just love this thing. Article is offering our listeners $50 off your first purchase of $100 or more. To claim, visit article.com 99 and the discount will be automatically applied at checkout. That's article.com 99 for $50 off your first purchase of $100 or more. Lenovo is sponsoring Life With Machines, a new video podcast hosted by comedian and tech whiz Baratunde Thurston. Together they explore how AI can be used for good to power people forward. That's because Lenovo believes their smarter AI is your AI, personalized, easy to scale and delivering outcomes for people and businesses with full stack AI, hardware, software and service solutions. Lenovo is bringing the transformative power of AI to diverse industries, organizations and people. Check out Life With Machines wherever you get your podcasts, even if you think it's a bit overhyped? AI is suddenly everywhere from self driving cars to molecular medicine to business efficiency. If it's not in your industry yet, it's coming fast. But AI needs a lot of speed and computing power, so how do you compete without costs spiraling out of control? Time to upgrade to the next generation of the cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, or oci. OCI is a blazing, fast, secure platform for your infrastructure, database, application development, plus all your AI and machine learning workloads. OCI costs 50% less for compute and 80% less for networking, so you're saving a pile of money. Thousands of businesses have already upgraded to oci, including Vodafone, Thomson Reuters and Suno AI. Right now, Oracle is offering to cut your current cloud bill in half if you move to OCI for new US customers with minimum financial commitment. Offer ends March 31st. See if your company qualifies for this Special offer@oracle.com invisible that's oracle.com invisible.
Roman Mars
We'Re.
Delaney Hall
Back with an episode that first aired in 2017, not long after Trump first took office. We're revisiting that story now because, well, he's back and the history from the 1980s is relevant once again. Here's producer Delaney hall.
John Fife
By the mid-1980s, the sanctuary movement had become very visible and also very controversial. Here's a report that aired on NBC around that time.
Alan Nelson
In the eyes of the congregation at St. Mary's Church, they are heroes. In the eyes of the federal government, they are criminals who smuggle aliens into this country illegally.
Roman Mars
The government didn't like that churches were openly defying immigration law in harboring undocumented immigrants. The Immigration and Naturalization Service, now known as Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ice, contended that many of these people didn't have legitimate asylum claims. The agency's stance was that many of these migrants had come to the US to find jobs, not because they feared political persecution.
Alan Nelson
A refugee from El Salvador. The administration contends he and others like him have come here for economic reasons. But the young man listed other reasons for fleeing his homeland, Martanzas killings, repressions, misery and hunger.
John Fife
The US Government found itself in a tough situation. They could allow the churches to continue openly disregarding the law, or they could launch an investigation into the movement and risk public disapproval by targeting sympathetic church workers.
Roman Mars
In 1984, the government launched an investigation into the sanctuary movement. They called it Operation Sojourner, a biblical term for traveler or wanderer. The goal was to collect enough evidence to indict the leaders of the movement and to stop churches from sheltering migrants. Shortly after the government launched its investigation, a couple of new volunteers approached members of the sanctuary movement, asking if they could get involved. Their names were Jesus Cruz and Solomon Graham.
Jim Corbett
I thought they don't fit the usual sanctuary volunteer profile. Right. They look a little tough and a little too experienced on the border for the average volunteer we're getting.
John Fife
This is Reverend John Fife. And Fife said that even though Cruz and Graham seemed a little different, somehow, it was his policy to welcome all who said they wanted to help.
Jim Corbett
They had crucifixes around their necks, and they presented themselves as folks who'd heard about the sanctuary movement and wanted to be a part of it. So we welcomed them and included them in.
John Fife
Cruz and Graham began attending meetings and helping transport Central American migrants through the sanctuary network.
Jim Corbett
They would drive folks from Tucson to Phoenix or from Phoenix to Albuquerque or from Phoenix to la. So they would drive legs on the underground railroad.
Roman Mars
But as it would turn out, Cruz and Graham were not ordinary volunteers. They were undercover informants. The government had hired them to infiltrate the movement and gather evidence.
John Fife
Cruz and Graham were both former smugglers. They'd worked on the border as guides, bringing people into the country illegally. Then they'd been caught by immigration, and.
Jim Corbett
They'D reached an agreement that if they would infiltrate us and inform the government about what we were doing, that that they would not only pay them, but. But drop the charges against them.
Roman Mars
The INS had decided to investigate the sanctuary movement using the same tactics they might use against any criminal smuggling enterprise. The agency wasn't swayed by the religious motivations of people like Reverend Fife. Here's Alan Nelson, the then commissioner of INS, speaking with ABC in 1985.
Alan Nelson
If you and I are meeting in.
Jim Corbett
A church building to plan to rob a bank and open with a prayer.
Alan Nelson
And close with a prayer, I don't.
Jim Corbett
Think many people would say this is.
Alan Nelson
A church service that should be protected.
A. Bates Butler III
They have the right to think what they want. Anybody does. That doesn't exclude them from obeying the laws of the United States.
John Fife
This is Ruthanne Meyers. She became the INS district director for Arizona in 1984. She didn't oversee the investigation into the sanctions, but she was briefed on it when she arrived at the Phoenix office.
A. Bates Butler III
Yeah, I was totally surprised. In my experience, I had no knowledge before of a church breaking the law and harboring illegal aliens, Smuggling and harboring.
Roman Mars
Meyer says the case was pretty straightforward.
A. Bates Butler III
These people were breaking the law, the law of the United States. I'm in favor of, excuse me, legal immigration. But not illegal immigration. I think we have the right to have our laws and to enforce them and decide who comes into this country and who doesn't.
Roman Mars
Cruise and Graham, along with a couple of other government agents, spent 10 months undercover gathering evidence against the sanctuary workers.
John Fife
Their methods would eventually come under public scrutiny because they hadn't just infiltrated the sanctuary movement. They were also secretly recording meetings, conversations, and in some cases, church services.
Roman Mars
Today's date is.
Ruth Ann Meyers
October 1, 1984. Time is about.
Roman Mars
8Pm where God will.
Delaney Hall
Deliver the needy when they cry for help.
Roman Mars
These undercover men method struck some people as offensive and overreaching. Here's Anthony Lewis, then a professor at Harvard Law School, speaking to ABC News in 1985.
Alan Nelson
Oh, it's the methods that bother me. I think most of us Americans would believe that in America you are entitled to a sense of privacy when you go into a church, maybe privacy of a particular kind. You and your God, a stranger who.
Roman Mars
Sojourns with you shall be to you as the native. The state was infiltrating and secretly surveilling churches in a country where the separation of church and state is a deeply held ideal. We reached out to two agents who were involved with the case and both declined to speak to us.
John Fife
The people overseeing the investigation at INS thought these methods were justified. They saw the movement as more political than religious.
A. Bates Butler III
Yes, there were many that thought it was under the guise of the church.
John Fife
Meaning the sanctuary workers were using religion as a cover to push a political agenda and undermine immigration laws.
Roman Mars
And it's true that some sanctuary volunteers were vocally critical of the American policy in Central America. Some expressed support for the left wing movements developing there. In fact, there was a divide within the movement itself about whether their work should be motivated primarily by humanitarian concerns or political ones.
Jim Corbett
That debate got to the point where we decided to have a gathering and try to resolve it.
Roman Mars
But two weeks before that meeting was supposed to happen, the government indicted 16 of the sanctuary workers in Tucson, including Reverend Fife.
A. Bates Butler III
On January 14, 1985, federal agents swept down arresting 63 Guatemalan and Salvadoran refugees across the United States and handing out indictments to 16 leaders of the sanctuary movement.
John Fife
That morning, Reverend Fife was sleeping when he heard someone banging on his front door.
Jim Corbett
And so I got up and I went to the door, and there were two border patrol agents there.
John Fife
His immediate concern was for the refugees that were staying at Southside Presbyterian Church right across the street from his house.
Jim Corbett
The only thought that occurred to me was I got all these vulnerable people over in the church. I need to Keep these guys occupied. So I invited him in, made coffee, stalled every way I could.
John Fife
He read through the entire indictment the officers had handed him, trying to buy some time.
Jim Corbett
My charges were pretty clear and. And they were pretty typical of everyone. They were a number of counts of conspiracy to violate federal law, harboring illegal aliens, transporting illegal aliens, and aiding and abetting illegal aliens. And everyone had different counts under each of those categories.
Roman Mars
Eventually, the border patrol agents went on their way, and Reverend Fife and the other leaders of the sanctuary movement were left with a daunting situation. They faced an impending high profile trial in which they'd be facing off with the federal government. And the charges against them were serious. If convicted, they could spend years in prison.
John Fife
They got to work assembling a team of lawyers to defend them.
Ruth Ann Meyers
So there's two bases, as I see it, for sanctuary. It's very simple, really.
John Fife
This is James Brosnahan, one of the defense lawyers.
Ruth Ann Meyers
The first is religion. And many churches, many religions have as a distinct imperative that you are to assist people who are on the road and who are fleeing some form of violence, oppression. It's the teaching of Jesus.
John Fife
The defense thought there was an argument to be made that the sanctuary workers were just acting in accordance with their faith. Not only that, the lawyers believed the religious rights of the sanctuary workers had been violated by the government agents who'd infiltrated their churches and made secret recordings.
Ruth Ann Meyers
And that's intimidation of people who are pursuing their Bible studies in a church.
Roman Mars
The second part of the defense's argument had to do with asylum law.
Ruth Ann Meyers
The law provides that when a person shows up at the border and they are fleeing certain specific kinds of oppression or violence, they have a right to come in. And when that is true, and that can be established in an immigration court, that person is entitled to stay in the United States. That's asylum.
Roman Mars
As the defense team researched the laws, they started to believe that their clients hadn't really violated the law at all. They thought the US Government had.
Ruth Ann Meyers
I did research both how the United States government was handling asylum applications from people from Central America. And I also researched international.
John Fife
This is A. Bates Butler iii, another lawyer for the sanctuary volunteers.
Ruth Ann Meyers
And I was appalled by what I discovered about how the United States government was systematically, it seemed, denying asylum applications from Central America.
Roman Mars
This was all happening in the context of a major shift in US refugee policy. Before 1980, the US approach to taking in refugees had been expressly political. It gave preference to refugees fleeing communist countries and countries in the Middle East.
John Fife
In 1980, President Carter signed the Refugee act into law. The law was supposed to create a fairer system by adopting a more humanitarian, non ideological definition of a refugee. It used the criteria developed by the united nations, which identified a refugee as anyone with a well founded fear of persecution based on race, religion, nationality, social group, or political opinion.
Roman Mars
Even though these new criteria were in place when reagan came into office, the lawyers for the sanctuary workers believed the government was not following its own law. They thought ins was turning away large numbers of el salvadorans and Guatemalans who should have qualified as political refugees.
John Fife
Butler had been skeptical of the sanctuary movement when he first learned about it, but his research had changed his mind.
Ruth Ann Meyers
And so I moved from a position of, well, this is all fine and dandy, and this is a religious thing to do, but it's illegal. I moved from that position to it's lawful to help these people, and it's the United States government that is violating the law.
Alan Nelson
The defendants and their supporters marched to the federal building in Phoenix for the first round of arraignments this morning. The charges, Transporting aliens, illegally, harboring them, and conspiracy. Inside the courtroom, the defendants pleaded not guilty. They were released without bail. Their trials were set for April 2. The sanctuary people say those trials will be a major test of religious freedoms in this country. This afternoon in Tucson, more arrested.
Roman Mars
After months of preparation, the defense team was feeling confident. They thought they had sympathetic clients, A good amount of public support, and compelling legal arguments. Here's reverend Fife again.
Jim Corbett
Our position was, oh, we welcome the opportunity to make that case in court, and we think we're gonna win in a slam dunk.
John Fife
But then, very early on, the defense team faced a major setback. The lead prosecutor for the government Was a lawyer named Donald Reno, Jr. And one of his first moves was to file a series of motions asking the federal judge who was hearing the case to limit the arguments the defense could make.
Jim Corbett
And then the federal judge who was hearing our case Ruled that we couldn't say anything in our defense during our trial about five subjects. United States refugee law, International refugee law, Conditions in el Salvador, conditions in Guatemala, or our religious faith. So that wiped out our entire legal position.
John Fife
I mean, what, what was left?
Jim Corbett
Nothing was left. And the way my attorney explained it was, well, federal judges in criminal prosecutions have enormous power to exclude evidence that they believe is not relevant to the charges that are being filed against the defendant.
Roman Mars
The judge had effectively reduced the case to its most basic level. Had the sanctuary workers engaged in a conspiracy to smuggle and harbor undocumented people? Yes or no? There was to be no discussion about context, history, or motivations.
John Fife
One of the defendants was a man named jim corbett. Along with reverend fife, he'd helped to found the sanctuary movement. Corbett died in 2001, but in an archival interview, he described the situation that the defense team found itself in. He said, it was as if a man was driving late at night in freezing weather. His car breaks down. So he goes to a nearby house.
Alan Nelson
And breaks in, and then is discovered and brought to trial. And the judge rules out any evidence that would indicate that it was 40 below. His car had gone bad. He had stopped, Went to the only house in the area, and entered it.
Roman Mars
Without understanding the context, Jim thought there was no way the jury could understand why the sanctuary workers had decided to shelter central americans.
Alan Nelson
Now, in terms of the necessity defense, we're talking about something very similar with people fleeing torture and murder In a very different context. But to rule out the ability to refer to that necessity Simply makes a model mockery of the law.
John Fife
The judge named earl carroll, Died in early February of 2017. We requested an interview with prosecutor Donald Reno, Jr. But he's still an active litigator for what's now known as immigration and customs enforcement. The agency declined our request to speak with him, but he was featured in a News report from 1985, and he described the sanctuary movement as, quote, an alien smuggling conspiracy.
Alan Nelson
The defendants induced, encouraged, smuggled, transported, and harbored illegal aliens. The government says that's not much different from drug smuggling.
Roman Mars
Over the next several months, the prosecution laid out its case against the sanctuary workers, Relying heavily on testimony from their undercover informants. Reno characterized the sanctuary movement as a smuggling operation, pure and simple.
John Fife
The defense team tried to undermine those accounts in cross examination and to sneak in details about context and motivation when they could. But in most ways, their hands were tied. And when it came time for the defense to present their case, they declined to put anyone on the stand.
Alan Nelson
Sanctuary movement. Today, the defense rested without questioning a single witness. Jury deliberations could begin next week. It is alleged the sanctuary.
Roman Mars
The jury deliberated for more than 48 hours, spread over nine days. On May 1, 1986, 16 months after the indictments and more than six months since the start of the trial, the jury filed into the courtroom to read the verdict. Of the 11 sanctuary workers who went to trial, three were acquitted of all charges. Eight were found guilty, including Reverend Fife, which hit bates butler, the lawyer, really hard.
Ruth Ann Meyers
After the jury came in, I was so disgusted with the system that I.
A. Bates Butler III
Had worked in for so long.
Roman Mars
I didn't want to be a part of It.
Ruth Ann Meyers
And we were so upset that our government and our court system had cast aside our clients with their moral positions and that we felt like the government and the courts were bankrupt, the system was bankrupt.
John Fife
But the other defense lawyer, James Brosnahan, had known there were significant hurdles they needed to overcome.
Ruth Ann Meyers
You know, juries are very good, but they come into the box with their own attitude. And the attitude is people just can't come over the border. If you're going to do that, you got to pay the price.
John Fife
Ruth Ann Meyers of the INS thought the verdict was fair.
A. Bates Butler III
The people that worked in the sanctuary movement did not present those people to immigration offices. They smuggled them into the US they gave them, quote, sanctuary in their churches. They did not follow the law.
John Fife
Next came the sentencing by the judge.
Ruth Ann Meyers
We really were worried that the judge was going to put him in prison.
Jim Corbett
My attorney told me, take a toothbrush in your hip pocket when you go to sentencing because they want you bad. So I had made arrangements with the congregation and with my family and everything, expecting to go to prison. And much to our astonishment, he sentenced all of us who were convicted to five years probation.
Roman Mars
The judge gave them relatively lenient sentences considering they'd been convicted of, in some cases, felonies.
Ruth Ann Meyers
We were relieved at that point. I think. I don't know what he thought, but I thought that if he gave these nice people a jail term, it would be awful public opinion on that. And I think he had some sense that that might be true.
John Fife
Many of the sanctuary workers, including Reverend Fife, went back to their communities and continued their work in the sanctuary movement. Churches continued sheltering people. Volunteers continued helping people across the border. Many of the sanctuary volunteers had made clear in their closing arguments in the trial that they wouldn't stop doing the work.
Alan Nelson
The government may have sentenced John Fife and seven other sanctuary activists, but it has hardly silenced them nor stopped them from a cross country crusade.
John Fife
And at that point, did the government just back off? I mean, they must have known that you were continuing to do exactly what they just tried you for, right?
Jim Corbett
They backed off us here in Tucson, but they tried one more trial in New Mexico.
Roman Mars
The government charged a man and a woman who were part of the sanctuary movement for transporting undocumented immigrants.
Jim Corbett
And the jury in that case found them not guilty. And at that point, we knew that the movement had grown to the point where juries would no longer convict sanctuary workers.
Roman Mars
Not long after the criminal trial had ended, a group of churches and refugee rights organizations filed a class action lawsuit against the government. They alleged, among other Things that the government had engaged in. Discriminatory treatment of asylum claims made by Guatemalans and Salvadorans. In 1990, the government settled the lawsuit.
Jim Corbett
They agreed to give everyone who was here without documents from those countries temporary protected status, work permits. And they agreed to a whole series of reforms of the political asylum process. So we essentially began to wind down the sanctuary movement.
John Fife
But even though the churches were slowing their work, the whole idea of sanctuary was spreading. College campuses, cities, counties, even whole states began to declare themselves sanctuaries, and not just for refugees fleeing persecution, but for undocumented people more broadly. This accelerated through the 1980s and has continued up to today.
Roman Mars
But what exactly sanctuary means varies from place to place.
Ruth Ann Meyers
Anything you want. That's part of the problem. And each city is probably a little bit different.
Roman Mars
Once again, lawyer James Brosnahan.
Ruth Ann Meyers
Usually the local authorities, police, sheriffs will not assist in the deportation of undocumented people.
Roman Mars
In some places, police aren't allowed to inquire about a person's immigration status or to give that information to the federal government. In other places, all residents are promised access to city services, regardless of their immigration status. These policies can be set in law, or they can just happen in practice.
John Fife
President Donald Trump talked a lot about sanctuary cities during his campaign, and he's pointed to murders committed by undocumented immigrants as evidence that sanctuary cities should not exist. He's threatened to pull federal funding from cities that identify as sanctuaries. And he's also promised to accelerate deportations in response. Churches are once again sheltering people. I think a lot of congregations across the nation are struggling with what will it mean to be faithful to the mandates of our faith underneath this administration.
Roman Mars
This is Allison Harrington. She's the current pastor of Southside Presbyterian in Tucson, the church where the sanctuary movement began in the 1980s. She and her congregation provided sanctuary to a couple of people who were threatened with deportation during the Obama administration. Administration. They're now having conversations about whether that work will expand in the next few years.
John Fife
I mean, I can't ignore the fact that my predecessor, John Fife, was indicted for doing the work that I'm doing right now and that he was looking at 10 years in prison. I try not to think about that, but you can't ignore that. Since 2011, churches have had some protected status as sanctuaries. In that year, Immigration and custom enforcement under President Obama issued a memo. It said that some sensitive locations require special consideration by immigration officers. The government has said we won't enter into those sensitive locations unless it's an extreme situation. Or we have higher levels of approval and those sensitive locations are houses of worship, hospitals and schools.
Roman Mars
But that practice isn't codified into law and could easily change. Recently there have been reports of immigration agents targeting undocumented people in hospitals and schools. Churches might also be vulnerable.
Jim Corbett
That's going to have to be worked out through a number of institutional decisions, as well as court decisions well into the future. What's going to be the result? We'll see. No one knows.
Delaney Hall
This two part story was produced by Delaney hall in 2017. The rerun was produced and mixed by Martin Gonzalez, original tech production by Sharif Youssef, music by Swan Rial and George Langford. Thank you to Miriam Davidson, Authority of Convictions of the Heart, for letting us use tape of her interview with Jim Corbett. An additional thanks to Trent Purdy at the University of Arizona Special Collections and Jude Pardee. Kathy Tu is our Executive Producer, Kurt Kolstedt is the Digital Director. The rest of the team includes Chris Barube, Jason De Leon, Emmett Fitzgerald, Christopher Johnson, Vivian Leigh, Lashma Dawn, Joe Rosenberg, Gabriella Gladney, Kelly Prime, Jacob Medina Gleason and me, Roman Mars. The 99% invisible logo was created by Stefan Lawrence. We are part of The Stitcher and SiriusXM podcast family now headquartered six blocks north in the Pandora building in beautiful uptown Oakland, California. You can find us on all the usual social media sites. We're making a real go of it on Bluesky.
Roman Mars
You can join us there as well.
Delaney Hall
As our own Discord server. I spend a lot of time on the Discord server. There's a link to that Discord server as well as every past episode of 99pi@99pi.org.
Sanctuary: A Historical Overview of the Sanctuary Movement
99% Invisible episode "Sanctuary," hosted by Roman Mars and released on January 21, 2025, delves into the origins and evolution of the sanctuary movement in the United States. This detailed exploration not only recounts the movement's beginnings in the 1980s but also ties its historical significance to contemporary immigration debates, especially in light of Donald Trump's return to the White House and his administration's stringent deportation policies.
In July 1980, a harrowing journey unfolded as more than two dozen Salvadoran migrants traversed the Arizona desert. The extreme heat of the Sombra Desert proved fatal for many, with Reverend John Fife recounting, “They were in the middle of the most desolate and deadly area of the desert. And I think out of the group of 26, 12 of them died the first day out” (02:22). The survivors, suffering from severe dehydration and heat stroke, were brought to a Tucson hospital where Reverend Fife first encountered them.
Initially uninformed about Central America's political turmoil, Fife admitted, “I didn’t know much about Central America or what was going on in countries like Nicaragua, Guatemala, and El Salvador around this time” (03:29). As he listened to the refugees' stories of escaping death squads and extreme violence, Fife began to comprehend the dire circumstances that forced hundreds of thousands to flee their homelands.
El Salvador's civil war, which had been brewing since the early 1900s under oppressive oligarchs and military dictatorships, intensified in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Left-wing guerrilla groups like the FMLN gained influence, prompting brutal military crackdowns. Reverend Fife learned that “Thousands of people were disappeared, murdered or displaced” (04:48).
This pattern of repression was mirrored in neighboring Nicaragua and Guatemala, where authoritarian regimes battled leftist rebels, further destabilizing the region. The influx of refugees in Tucson symbolized a broader humanitarian crisis, compelling religious leaders like Fife to take action.
Reverend Fife and his congregation at Southside Presbyterian Church became pivotal in sheltering Central American refugees. Drawing from religious imperatives, they provided not just physical shelter but also food, clothing, legal assistance, and emotional support. Jim Corbett, a Quaker and a key figure in the movement, emphasized the moral responsibility, stating, “We have to conclude from history that they got it right... I don't think we can allow that to happen on our border in our time” (15:31).
Inspired by historical precedents like the Underground Railroad and the sanctuary provided by religious institutions during the Holocaust, the movement sought to create a network of safe havens. By 1982, their efforts culminated in a public declaration, with banners proclaiming, “This is a sanctuary of God for the oppressed of Central America and immigration. Do not profane the sanctuary of God” (18:33).
As the sanctuary movement gained momentum, it attracted federal scrutiny. The Reagan administration, driven by Cold War dynamics, viewed the movement through a political lens. In a strategic move, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) launched Operation Sojourner, an investigation aimed at dismantling the sanctuary network.
Undercover agents, including former smugglers Jesus Cruz and Solomon Graham, infiltrated the movement. Their testimonies portrayed sanctuary workers as part of an illegal smuggling operation, leading to the indictment of 16 leaders, including Reverend Fife, in January 1985 (32:22). Alan Nelson, then INS Commissioner, stated, “They have the right to think what they want. That doesn't exclude them from obeying the laws of the United States” (34:35), reflecting the administration's stance against the movement's defiance of immigration laws.
The sanctuary leaders faced severe legal challenges. The prosecution, spearheaded by Donald Reno Jr., characterized the movement as an "alien smuggling conspiracy" (46:48). Despite the defense's efforts to highlight religious motivations and flawed asylum processes, the federal judge severely limited their arguments. Reverend Fife expressed frustration, saying, “I think juries are very good, but they come into the box with their own attitude” (48:58).
After a prolonged trial, outcomes varied: three of the eleven sanctuary workers were acquitted, while eight, including Reverend Fife, were convicted but received relatively lenient sentences—five years of probation instead of lengthy prison terms (50:17). This verdict underscored the judiciary's strict interpretation of immigration laws, dismissing the broader humanitarian context that fueled the sanctuary movement.
The convictions did not silence the sanctuary movement. In fact, they galvanized further legal action. By 1990, a class-action lawsuit against the government alleged discriminatory treatment of asylum seekers from Central America. The government settled, granting temporary protected status and initiating reforms in the asylum application process (51:45).
Moreover, the movement's ethos permeated various societal sectors. Sanctuary concepts expanded beyond churches to include college campuses, cities, counties, and even entire states. This expansion ensured that the sanctuary movement remained a resilient force advocating for undocumented individuals (52:28).
Fast forward to the present, the sanctuary movement's history is invoked amidst Donald Trump's presidency, which has reinvigorated debates over immigration enforcement. Trump’s administration has targeted sanctuary cities, threatening to withhold federal funding and accelerate deportations. Pastor Allison Harrington of Southside Presbyterian in Tucson illustrates the ongoing struggle, noting the church's efforts to shelter individuals even under heightened political tension (53:11).
The episode highlights that while sanctuary policies vary—ranging from non-cooperation with immigration authorities to ensuring access to city services regardless of immigration status—the foundational principles remain rooted in religious compassion and humanitarian aid. As Roman Mars aptly puts it, “Churches might also be vulnerable” (54:03), underscoring the persistent challenges faced by sanctuary institutions.
Jim Corbett reflects on the movement's resilience despite governmental opposition: “They backed off us here in Tucson, but they tried one more trial in New Mexico” (50:48). The sanctuary movement's ability to adapt and expand illustrates its enduring relevance in advocating for marginalized communities.
As immigration policies continue to evolve, the sanctuary movement serves as a testament to the power of collective action grounded in moral and religious convictions. The episode concludes by posing critical questions about the future of sanctuary practices and their alignment with both legal frameworks and ethical imperatives.
Jim Corbett (14:52): “We have to conclude from history that they got it right. Those were the folks who understood and got it right.”
Reverend John Fife (43:25): “Our position was, oh, we welcome the opportunity to make that case in court, and we think we're gonna win in a slam dunk.”
Alan Nelson (34:35): “They have the right to think what they want. That doesn't exclude them from obeying the laws of the United States.”
Patricia Barcelo (21:35): “I remember my parents talking about this and saying, you know, who would do this? Who would risk their lives, you know, their good lives here in the US for people like us.”
Roman Mars (55:30): “That’s going to have to be worked out through a number of institutional decisions, as well as court decisions well into the future. What’s going to be the result? We’ll see. No one knows.”
The Sanctuary episode of 99% Invisible meticulously traces the lineage of the sanctuary movement from its nascent stages in 1980s Tucson to its contemporary manifestations amidst renewed immigration challenges. By intertwining personal narratives, historical contexts, and legal battles, Roman Mars provides a comprehensive understanding of how faith-based activism can influence and withstand governmental policies. The movement’s legacy continues to shape dialogues around immigration, law, and moral responsibility in the United States.