Aaron Mahnke's Cabinet of Curiosities: Episode Summary – "Invasive Species"

Release Date: December 17, 2024

In this captivating episode of Aaron Mahnke's Cabinet of Curiosities, the host delves into two enthralling narratives that explore the unforeseen repercussions of human intervention and the complexities of historical treasure claims. Through meticulous storytelling, Mahnke unravels the intricacies of an ecological experiment gone awry and the protracted legal saga surrounding a sunken Spanish galleon.

1. The Invasive Species Experiment

A. The Butterfly Introduction Aaron Mahnke opens with an ode to butterflies, highlighting their metamorphic beauty and benign nature. He remarks, “The fashion icon of the insect world is one of nature's most fascinating shapeshifters” (00:00), emphasizing their transformation from caterpillars to winged marvels and their generally positive presence in ecosystems.

B. The Scientific Experiment In the 1990s, researchers embarked on an ambitious study to understand population bottlenecks—the critical reductions in genetic diversity that can threaten species survival. They chose butterflies for their visual appeal and ecological benefits, ensuring that releasing them on a remote Finnish archipelago would minimize environmental impact. Mahnke explains, “The scientists were going to take a small population of butterflies and release them somewhere that they couldn't bump into others of their kind” (00:00).

C. Unforeseen Consequences Contrary to expectations, the experiment spiraled out of control. As caterpillars began to pupate, mysterious anomalies emerged. Mahnke narrates the horrifying transformation: “Some of the caterpillars began to curl and twist, convulsing as something wriggled beneath their skin” (00:00). These caterpillars were lethal hosts to parasite wasps, which ultimately decimated the butterfly population and introduced a new invasive species to the region.

D. The Domino Effect The introduction of these wasps had a cascading impact on the local ecosystem. Not only did the wasps outcompete the native butterflies, but they also carried even smaller parasites with unique bacteria strains previously nonexistent in the area. Mahnke aptly describes it as, “a horrific set of Russian nesting dolls” (00:00), illustrating the compound nature of the ecological disaster.

E. Long-Term Impact and Conclusion Three decades later, the island remains a testament to the experiment’s unintended legacy. While the invasive wasps continue to thrive, a handful of resilient butterflies persist, creating a “kaleidoscope of beautiful winged survivors” (00:00). Mahnke concludes this segment by reflecting on the delicate balance of ecosystems and the unpredictable nature of introducing non-native species.

2. The San Jose Galleon Custody Battle

A. Historical Background Shifting from ecology to maritime history, Mahnke recounts the dramatic tale of the San Jose, a Spanish galleon that met a fiery end in 1708 near Cartania, Colombia. He sets the scene: “A cannonball accidentally hit the San Jose's store of powder and ammunitions. The ship exploded, sending the San Jose $20 billion worth of gold and jewels and 600 souls to the bottom of the sea” (06:09).

B. The Discovery and Initial Claims Fast forward to 1981, the US salvage company Glaucomara discovers the wreck. Their initial proposal to share the treasure with the Colombian government—“split the treasure 50 50” (06:09)—quickly soured, igniting a protracted legal dispute.

C. Colombia's Counterclaim In 2015, Colombia asserts its rightful claim, revealing that the San Jose was discovered separately from Glaucomara's expedition. Utilizing aquatic robots for verification, Colombia challenges the validity of the American claim, stating, “the Glacamora expedition had no claim to the treasure” (06:09).

D. Multiple Stakeholders and Conflicting Interests The custody battle intensifies as various parties stake their claims:

• Spain contends that the treasure rightfully belongs to them, as it was originally part of the Spanish crown’s holdings.

• Indigenous Groups from Peru and Bolivia argue that the treasure was plundered from their ancestors, advocating for its return as reparations for historical colonization.

• Colombian Government aims to use the treasure to educate the public, envisioning the San Jose as a museum exhibit without exploiting its wealth.

• Archaeologists and Historians emphasize the importance of preserving the wreck as an archaeological site and a memorial to the 600 lives lost, opposing any attempts to disturb or extract artifacts.

Mahnke highlights the complexity of these overlapping claims, noting, “Between unclear maritime laws and confusion over international jurisdiction, there's honestly no easy answer for who gets the $20 billion hoard” (06:09).

E. Current Status and Ongoing Litigation The dispute has escalated to the International Court of Justice in The Hague, with no resolution in sight. Mahnke poignantly remarks, “When it comes to buried treasure, it turns out that Long John Silver was wrong. X may mark the spot, but it doesn't win in court” (06:09), encapsulating the tangible yet legally entangled nature of maritime treasures.

Conclusion

In this episode, Aaron Mahnke masterfully intertwines ecological cautionary tales with historical legal battles, illustrating the far-reaching consequences of human actions—whether through scientific experimentation or the unending allure of lost treasures. The narratives serve as reminders of the intricate interplay between nature, history, and law, leaving listeners with a profound appreciation for the complexities that lie beneath the surface of seemingly straightforward stories.

For those intrigued by these tales of the bizarre and the enigmatic, Cabinet of Curiosities offers a treasure trove of stories that beckon the curious mind to explore further.

Subscribe to Aaron Mahnke's Cabinet of Curiosities on Apple Podcasts or visit curiositiespodcast.com to stay updated on future episodes and immerse yourself in more extraordinary stories.