Loading summary
Aaron Manke
Welcome to Erin Menke's Cabinet of Curiosities, a production of iHeartRadio and Grim and Mild. Our world is full of the unexplainable. And if history is an open book, all of these amazing tales are right there on display, just waiting for us to explore. Welcome to the Cabinet of Curiosities. Humankind is an image driven species. We painted our stories on cave walls before the invention of the written word. Even podcast creators like myself have to admit the human urge to illustrate our imaginations is one of our oldest impulses. Flora Shallcross Stone knew this better than most 19th century women. She was an avid patron of the arts, a woman who loved the theater, and in 1871, she married a photographer. It was an odd match from the start. Her new husband, Edward, was 20 years older and quite a workaholic. Although they would go on to have one son together, he rarely stayed in one place for very long, often abandoning his family for assignments photographing landscapes along the west coast of North America. So it's perhaps understandable that Flora, left alone with relatives in Calistoga, California, felt abandoned. I mean, who wouldn't, right? In her loneliness, she turned to a mutual friend of theirs, Harry Larkins, a reporter for the Evening Post. The two began an illicit affair, which they did their best to conceal from the ever absent Edward. He would find out about it, however, and confront Larkins repeatedly. The reporter did not seem intimidated, even when Edward visited him at the Evening Post offices and struck him across the face. The matter seemed settled when Edward left again for an assignment in Portland, but thanks to a mutual friend, he would learn that Flora and Harry were still writing each other love letters. Enraged, he tracked Larkins down. On October 17th of 1874, Larkins, staying at a hotel on a job for the Post, received a knock on his door. He answered it to see the outraged face of Edward. The photographer shot Larkins through the heart at point blank range, and Larkins died almost instantly. Edward turned himself in to the local police and was promptly arrested for murder. Reporters across the country ate up this story. It was a lurid tale that had everything. Sex, violence, betrayal. By the time Edward went to trial in early 1875, there was a wave of public sympathy on his side. He was seen as the injured party in this situation, and his willingness to surrender himself over to the police helped reinforce that story. Now it's impossible to know how Flora was feeling at this time. Some sources say that she filed for divorce as early as December 17, although her petition hung in limbo during her husband's trial. It's hard to imagine that she shared the sentiments of the press. One way or another, she had had enough of Edward. As for the trial, the judge's instructions to the jury were that there were four possible outcomes. K, Guilty of murder in the first degree, guilty of a lesser sentence, not guilty by reason of insanity or not guilty. And the not guilty verdict was seen as the least likely given that Edward turned himself in a clear admission of guilt. The judge instructed the all male jury that even if the allegations of infidelity against Harry Larkins were true, Edward did not have the right to take the law into his own hands. They should weigh the evidence without bias. However, when the verdict came down, the judge was in for a shock. The jury unanimously determined that Edward was not guilty. Even at that time, it was seen as a blatant defiance of the judge's instructions. The evidence was clear and yet the justifiable homicide verdict stood and Edward was released from custody. Flora and Edward's marriage would not last. They divorced after the trial and Flora passed away before the age of 30. Edward would give up their son to an orphanage so that he could go back to photography as a career. Free from both his family and the law. Edward would go on to fame and fortune. While he was briefly famous for shooting a man, he would later make his mark on history by shooting a horse. Many times, in fact. You see, he was the photographer behind A Horse in Motion. The series of 12 images showing a horse and jockey at full gallop would become known as the first piece of cinema images laid in sequence to create the impression of motion. He would conduct many similar experiments throughout his career to capture human and animal motion decades before the first motion pictures became popular in France. So the next time you pull out your phone to take a video of your pet, pause for a moment to remember the murderer who made this technology possible. Planning the heist was easy. It was what came after that was the hard part. Radu Dogaru had performed the same routine for days. He would take a stroll through the Museum park at the heart of Rotterdam. He'd pause at the Kunstal Gallery, peering through the broad windows at the Dutch masters displayed inside. To the security guards stationed in the museum, he seemed like a curious art lover. After all, dozens of people looked through the windows at the art every day. But Radu wasn't studying brushstrokes. He was studying exit routes. 28 year old Radu had been making a living in the Netherlands as a petty criminal, robbing houses with a crew of friends from the same Romanian village. But he'd gotten sick of the small scores and he wanted something bigger. He had heard that there was money in art and that the Kunsthal was putting together a new exhibit. Radu had taken his friends to see that exhibit, bringing along their girlfriends so as not to look suspicious. He had noticed three very important things. The first was that in one hall there were seven medium sized paintings, just the right size to carry. The second was that the fire exit seemed very easy to force open. And the third, there were no guards on sight after dark. It was perfect. So at just after 3 in the morning on October 16 of 2012, Radu and his three friends burst through the fire door and into the gallery. Two minutes and 48 seconds later, they were gone, with millions of euros of artwork in hand. When authorities and museum officials arrived at the scene just a few minutes later, it was carnage. In one fell swoop, the museum had lost priceless works by Matisse, Picasso and Monet. And there was no telling whether they'd ever be seen again. It's not uncommon for art thieves to remain anonymous. For years. The thieves who ransacked the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in 1990, one of the biggest museum heists in American history, still haven't been identified. But that wasn't the case with this story. Just three months after Radu and his accomplices broke into the Kunsthal, they were in police custody, still missing though the art. Now, at first, authorities worried the paintings could be miles away by now. They might be hidden in a safe house or maybe even already sold to a buyer and lost forever. However, this was assuming Radu and his accomplices were experienced art thieves. The truth was this was their first foray into the world of fine art. While famous paintings have eye dropping price tags, actually seeing that money as a thief is incredibly difficult. The second a famous painting goes missing from a museum, there's a target on it. You can't just hawk a Matisse at a pawn shop the way that you might a stolen watch. And any reputable art broker would immediately flag the authorities if they found a missing Picasso. Because of this, most art thieves have to go to private buyers who are already lined up. If they don't, the stolen art may be left to molder in storage for years. It's like having millions in a bank account, but. But you can't withdraw a penny of it. And as you might have guessed, Radu and his friends did not have a buyer ready to go. So they ended up giving the paintings to Radu's mother in Romania for safekeeping. When authorities finally caught up with her, Radu's mother, Olga, confessed that she had buried the paintings and this was good news. All the authorities needed her to do was lead them to the artworks and the museum would have its priceless collection returned. Olga balked. It wasn't that simple, she explained. As the authorities were closing in, she panicked. So she dug up the paintings, stacked them in her oven, and turned on the broiler. Nails and pigments found in her oven corresponded to several of the missing works, confirming Olga was telling the truth. Great art is supposed to inspire passion, but be careful to not let that passion run too hot or you might find yourself, like Olga and Radu, with millions of dollars of priceless art all gone up in smoke. I hope you've enjoyed today's guided tour of the Cabinet of Curiosities. Subscribe for free on Apple Podcasts or learn more about the show by visiting curiositiespodcast.com the show was created by me, Aaron Manke, in partnership with How Stuff Works. I make another award winning show called Lore, which is a podcast, book series and television show and you can learn all about it over at the world of lore.com and until next time, stay curious.
In the "Up in Smoke" episode of Aaron Mahnke's Cabinet of Curiosities, listeners are treated to two enthralling tales that traverse the realms of 19th-century drama and modern-day art heists. Hosted by Aaron Mahnke and produced by iHeartPodcasts and Grim & Mild, this episode delves deep into human emotions, ambition, and the unforeseen consequences of our actions.
The first narrative transports us to the late 1800s, unraveling the tumultuous life of Flora Shallcross Stone and her tumultuous marriage to Edward, a dedicated photographer.
Flora's Turbulent Marriage: In 1871, Flora marries Edward Stone, a photographer 20 years her senior. Their marriage is marred by Edward's frequent absences due to his photographic assignments along North America's west coast. Left to fend for herself in Calistoga, California, Flora's loneliness leads her into an illicit affair with Harry Larkins, a reporter for the Evening Post.
"Humankind is an image-driven species... Flore turned to a mutual friend, Harry Larkins, in her loneliness." [00:04]
The Affair and Its Consequences: Despite their efforts to keep the affair hidden, Edward discovers the infidelity. Confrontations escalate, culminating on October 17, 1874, when Edward confronts and fatally shoots Harry Larkins.
"On October 17th of 1874, Larkins... received a knock on his door... The photographer shot Larkins through the heart at point blank range." [00:04]
The Trial and Surprising Verdict: Edward's subsequent trial becomes a media sensation, portrayed as the wronged husband rather than the perpetrator. Despite clear evidence, the all-male jury delivers a unanimous "not guilty" verdict, a decision seen as a blatant defiance of judicial expectations.
"Even at that time, it was seen as a blatant defiance of the judge's instructions." [00:04]
Edward's Unconventional Legacy: Post-trial, Edward divorces Flora and relinquishes their son to an orphanage to resume his photographic career. Ironically, his notoriety from the murder doesn't overshadow his contributions to photography. He becomes renowned for "A Horse in Motion," pioneering the concept of motion pictures long before their advent in France.
"At the end... free from both his family and the law... the murderer who made this technology possible." [00:04]
This story intricately weaves themes of love, betrayal, and the unintended paths one's actions can lead, highlighting how personal turmoil can inadvertently shape technological advancements.
The second story shifts to a contemporary setting, focusing on Radu Dogaru's audacious art heist in Rotterdam's Kunsthal Gallery.
Radu's Ambitious Plan: Dissatisfied with petty crimes, 28-year-old Radu orchestrates a sophisticated heist targeting the Kunsthal Gallery, where an exhibit featuring Dutch masters like Matisse, Picasso, and Monet is on display.
"He'd noticed three very important things... It was perfect." [00:04]
The Execution of the Heist: On October 16, 2012, shortly after 3 AM, Radu and his three accomplices exploit the perceived vulnerabilities—medium-sized paintings, an easily forced fire exit, and absence of night guards—to steal millions in artwork within just under three minutes.
"At just after 3 in the morning... they were gone, with millions of euros of artwork in hand." [00:04]
The Aftermath and Capture: Unlike many art heists where thieves remain elusive, Radu's inexperience leads to a swift downfall. Lacking connections to private buyers and unable to monetize the stolen masterpieces, the paintings languish as unusable assets. Radu's mother, Olga, becomes entangled when she attempts to safeguard the paintings, ultimately leading authorities to recover the lost art.
"Olga balked... she dug up the paintings, stacked them in her oven, and turned on the broiler." [00:04]
Lessons Learned: The tale underscores the complexities of the art theft world, where the true value of art isn't just monetary but also tied to its provenance and recognition. Radu's failure to navigate this intricate landscape results in the destruction of priceless works, serving as a cautionary tale about the perils of unchecked ambition.
"Great art is supposed to inspire passion, but be careful to not let that passion run so hot or you might find yourself... with millions of dollars of priceless art all gone up in smoke." [00:04]
This narrative highlights the thin line between ambition and folly, illustrating how lack of expertise and foresight can lead to catastrophic outcomes, even in grand schemes.
"Up in Smoke" masterfully intertwines two distinct stories that, while separated by time and theme, both explore the depths of human emotion and the far-reaching consequences of our actions. From a 19th-century marital tragedy that inadvertently birthed cinematic technology to a modern-day art heist ruined by inexperience, Aaron Mahnke's storytelling captivates listeners, urging them to ponder the intricate tapestry of curiosity, ambition, and fate.
For those intrigued by these stories, Aaron Mahnke's Cabinet of Curiosities offers a treasure trove of the unbelievable, the unsettling, and the bizarre, perfect for those who revel in the curious corners of history and human behavior.