Loading summary
Podcast Host
Welcome to Advancing Health. Many a parent has wondered what's really going on inside the head of their beloved teenager. As we hear in this podcast, a new predictive tool helps answer that question and can flag teens at elevated risk for developing a psychiatric illness in the near future.
Jordan Steiger
Hi, everyone, and welcome to the Advancing Health Podcast. My name is Jordan Steiger and I am the Director of Behavioral Health and Violence Prevention at the American Hospital Association. I'm joined today by Dr. Jonathan Posner, who is the J.P. gibbons Distinguished professor of Psychiatry, and Dr. Matthew Engelhard, the Assistant professor of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, both at Duke University School of medicine. So, Dr. Posner and Dr. Engelhard, thank you so much for being here today.
Dr. Jonathan Posner
Thanks for having us.
Dr. Matthew Engelhard
Yeah, thanks for having us.
Jordan Steiger
We're really excited to talk about the work you're doing. This is a little bit different of a topic that I think we usually have on our Advancing Health podcast, more kind of focused on the research and what could be coming down the pike in terms of behavioral health. So I'm really, really excited to share everything with our membership today that you've been working on. I would love for you to just tell the audience a little bit about what you do. The Duke Predictive Model of Adolescent Mental Health, or we'll call it the Duke PMA to shorten that a little bit on this podcast and just tell us what this tool is, who it's for, and what it can do. Dr. Posner, why don't you get us started with this one?
Dr. Jonathan Posner
We designed the Duke PMA to be able to automate the assessment of psychiatric risk in teenagers. Essentially, what the tool does is it can identify which teenagers are most likely to develop a psychiatric illness within the next 12 months. It does that by using pretty standard questionnaires that can easily be collected in a primary care setting. Then not only does it tell you who's at risk, but it also tells you what's contributing to that risk. As an example, let's say I am a pediatrician and I'm about to evaluate a 14 year old. I might only have five or ten minutes with that kid, and it's not enough time to do a thorough psychiatric assessment. But the Duke PMA will automate that for me, and it will tell me that the kid that I'm evaluating who seems stable today actually has an 80% chance or a 90% chance of developing a psychiatric illness in the next year. And a key contributor to that might be poor sleep. So, as the pediatrician, if I can get that Kid sleeping better today, I might be able to prevent him from ever developing a psychiatric condition.
Jordan Steiger
Wow. That could be transformative for adolescent behavioral health. That's really incredible. You mentioned sleep is maybe one of the predictors. And I know in our conversations you've said that's a pretty significant predictor. What are some of the others?
Dr. Jonathan Posner
So we looked at a bunch of different factors that relate to psychiatric risk. And so some of the other contributors are things like conflict within the family, the school setting, some demographic features, a history of childhood adversity, and family history of psychiatric illness. So some of them are things that we could. That are modifiable, that a physician could say, okay, I'm going to try to intervene on that. Other things like family history of psychiatric illness are more challenging to intervene on.
Jordan Steiger
Absolutely. But that does give the clinician a great opportunity, at least to get ahead of it and start intervening early. And it sounds like that really is the goal of this work.
Dr. Jonathan Posner
That's right, yeah. The goal is really to move psychiatry into a model that's much more proactive and preventative.
Jordan Steiger
Dr. Engelhard, tell us a little bit more. Just why AI tools. What is the most transformative thing about using AI tools like this to predict mental health before symptoms appear?
Dr. Matthew Engelhard
Yeah, so I think AI tools are really good at figuring out what in a specific type of information ends up being predictive. So compared to more traditional models, I think of them as being able to extract all of that signal. And when you couple these tools with a really large data set like the one we've been working with, which is coming out of adolescent brain cognitive development study, it really enhances our ability to do that. So first and foremost, it's about just being able to pull as much predictive power as we can. At the same time, AI tools are really good at being able to combine different types of information together to say, what is shared between this questionnaire and this questionnaire and this questionnaire, and what is distinct between them and. And being able to draw on those individually and together again, to enhance our ability to make the best predictions that we can.
Jordan Steiger
That makes total sense. And I think it would be great. I probably should have started with this. Can we tell the audience a little bit about where you're at in your research? And just this whole work, it sounds like you've done quite a bit already to show that this model is really impactful.
Dr. Matthew Engelhard
So we've already developed our model, and it's a matter of making sure that this model. That we have everything in place so that this model can reach as many people as possible. We're really careful about making sure that our model is what we call generalizable, that we built it in this study, which is intended to be. Which is nationally representative, but it doesn't include everyone. We want to make sure that we built it in this particular study. And now we have a system that we're confident is going to be able to work for everyone across the the United States, regardless of what region they're part of, regardless of their demographic background, and even regardless of some of the specific data collection practices that might be in place where they receive their care. Right now we're in a phase where we're getting ready to take our model that we've built and to validate it in a bunch of different rural communities and in several states. But before we do that, we're making absolutely sure that it is going to work effectively for everybody.
Jordan Steiger
That makes total sense. And I think going into rural communities presents such an opportunity to expand access to care. Make sure that we're focusing in on that prevention aspect a little bit. But tell us a little bit more about that, Dr. Posner. Maybe just why you're starting to test in these rural areas and what's next in terms of that.
Dr. Jonathan Posner
Yeah, I mean, one of the key motivators in developing the Duke PMA was to try to make psychiatric assessment much more efficient by automating the process. And the availability of mental health providers across the boards is extremely limited. But then if you go into rural areas, the problem is even more severe. So the reason why we wanted to bring the Duke PMA to rural communities is for exactly that reason that the availability of providers is so limited in those communities that we thought the Duke PMA could be particularly helpful in that setting.
Jordan Steiger
I was thinking about the workforce aspect as you both were talking about this, and just how that can, I'm sure, really, really help clinicians in these areas that maybe don't have the time, you know, to spend with the kids that really need the help and the mental health support, you know, or they might not catch something that's happening because they don't have the time.
Dr. Jonathan Posner
Yeah, I think that that is really a huge factor in that. We're not making the claim that the Duke PMA could do an assessment better than a trained professional. It's just that it can do it much more efficiently. And those trained professionals aren't available in lots of settings.
Jordan Steiger
Absolutely. It's an additional tool for trained professionals to use. Thinking about how this is going to play out in a real World clinic setting in some of these rural communities. What do we think? I know we just talked about workforce and expanding access, but some of those other big opportunities and maybe some of the challenges that might arise in practice.
Dr. Jonathan Posner
One of the big opportunities that I would see is for this to become a standard part of a pediatric assessment. The comparison that I like to use is with cardiac risk. Essentially, all adults in the US get screened for cardiac risk for cardiovascular disease, and then the risk gets tracked over time. The goal is to intervene well in advance of anyone ever having a heart attack, for example. And so we would love to see something similar to that with mental health risk so that kids are identified as being high risk before the conditions have really taken root. And the earlier we can intervene, our chances of being able to help these kids is substantially higher.
Jordan Steiger
Absolutely. And walk me through before we go to maybe some of the challenges, say a child is identified as having a risk for sleep. Let's use that as the example because we brought it up earlier. What happens after that? Just tell me, kind of walk me through the clinical process after that.
Dr. Jonathan Posner
So, fortunately, with sleep, we have really good evidence based interventions that can help kids sleep better. So depending on the setting and the community and the availability, being able to refer that child for a psychotherapy to address poor sleep would be one natural route to go.
Jordan Steiger
The reason I'm asking that, I guess, is I'm thinking about these rural communities that might not always have the resources available to kind of refer to those additional services. So I'm, I guess, thinking about challenges and maybe some of that.
Dr. Jonathan Posner
Yeah, I think that's. No, it's a great, it's a great point. One of the things that Matt and I have talked a lot about is we would ideally love to be able to bring the Duke PMA to schools because that's where kids are. But one of the challenges of that is that the last thing we want to do is identify a child at being high risk, but then not having any resources for them, not being able to refer them to a provider. So by working within primary care settings, they'll at least be partnered immediately with a medical team. And some of the interventions can be pretty straightforward. So, for example, with sleep, talking to the child and talking to the family about better sleep hygiene, better sleep habits, that could actually go a long way and doesn't require a separate referral.
Jordan Steiger
No, absolutely, that's a great point. Dr. Engelhard, what do you think about challenges and opportunities?
Dr. Matthew Engelhard
Gosh, we have so many opportunities to make an impact here and so many opportunities to get more and more sophisticated in our ability to perform this work. So I think being able to connect with the schools is a tremendous opportunity. We also see there's an opportunity in being able to understand the device use component of the picture here. How do adolescents use of their digital devices? How does that contribute to some of the development of mental health distress that we're seeing? And then how can we in turn interpret information coming from those devices to help us intervene again? Another opportunity that we're really excited about is that as part of the work that we're embarking on now, we're going to be collecting information about home environments as well. This is drawing on research that we've been engaged in for a while now to understand relationships between different personal environments over the course of the day and different health risks that individuals might be exposed to. It's known that there are relationships between aspects of home environments and adolescent mental health, but we have the opportunity to work with adolescents and their, and their parents to document different components of home environments and understand, again, how that relates in turn to the mental health picture and maybe to make recommendations along those lines as well. I think I would also add one more, which is that, you know, we've. We've mentioned the importance of sleep, which has already come up, and I think we're very excited about the opportunity to put that knowledge to use and understand whether we can in fact use our model to identify children that are at high risk of worsening mental health because of their sleep, at least in part, and to see if intervening on sleep, giving them some actionable recommendations to change sleep patterns, as I think Jonathan mentioned, whether that can indeed move the needle for those kids.
Jordan Steiger
That makes total sense. And, you know, thinking about teenagers too, in the home environment, I feel like that's really, really important, thinking about mental health. And, you know, you bring up your personal device use too, and I think that's another fascinating thing. I'll be curious to follow your work and see what comes of that, because we know that's a huge component in the way mental health kind of manifests for kids these days. Tell me a little bit more about what the Duke PMA can be used for. Is this a universal tool to predict mental illness across the spectrum of different disorders that children can experience, or is this really focused in on just a few different things?
Dr. Jonathan Posner
Yeah, it's a great question. And what it actually predicts is something called a P factor, which is a global measure of mental illness. So it essentially encompasses risk for the full spectrum of psychiatric disorders and One of the reasons why we chose the P factor is because if it was specific to a predicting risk for one disorder, its utility would be much more limited. So, for example, if it predicted development of bipolar disorder, that would still be useful, but the number of teenagers that you could use it with would be also very limited. By using a global measure, it can be applied essentially to all kids. We're working to make it as user friendly as possible. The entire battery of questions are being put onto an iPad. So in theory, a family comes to their primary care clinic, and while they're in the waiting room, they could be handed the iPad in answer all the questions, and then the risk prediction and the profile would then be fed forward to the clinician who's about to see them. In the current version of the tool, to complete all the questions, it probably takes about half an hour. And that's one thing that we're really focused on, is to try to get the assessment down to as short as possible so that families could complete it in, say, 10 minutes rather than 30 minutes. And so what we're trying to do is to limit the number of questions while still maintaining the predictive power. And that's an active area of work for us.
Dr. Matthew Engelhard
And I would add that from the AI perspective, I think one of the reasons we've been so successful in doing something that is new here is the fact that in focusing broadly on all these different pathologies, we've really enhanced our ability to learn about relationships between general psychopathology and, and all of these different types of predictive features that we've talked about. It puts us in a position to give people the help they need. It's also enhanced our ability to understand what risk factors contribute.
Jordan Steiger
I know we all are in the world right now where everybody is talking about AI constantly, and I think AI and mental health is a really hot topic right now. I know a lot of our members at the AHA are really kind of trying to understand and consider how they can incorporate more AI predictive models and all sorts of different things that you all know much more about than I do. But a lot of the audience on this podcast is hospital leaders. So if they're listening and thinking, how can I do this at my organization? How can I get something like the Duke PMA and for my primary care clinics or psychiatric clinics for kids, what would you tell them?
Dr. Matthew Engelhard
Well, first I would tell them we're always happy to engage with folks that are interested in getting connected on this, so happy to talk to specific individuals who might like to adopt some of this technology. Thinking about interest in AI, broadly AI is so many different things. I mean, I think we're in an era where people think of ChatGPT and other chatbots as being synonymous with AI in some ways. And I would say that this is a little bit different. I mean, when we talk about AI, we're thinking more broadly about systems that are used to make sense of data, to understand patterns in data, in this case, patterns that help us understand again, who's at greatest likelihood of being in mental health distress. So we're thinking of sort of AI in a broad versus a narrow sense here and how to get this kind of technology up and running at a particular institution. There is institutional know how that is, that is required, but we are doing everything we can to make this tool as broadly accessible as possible. Our model is in fact available in a public repository right now, and we are happy to work with folks to think about how they might take the publicly facing resources that we've made available and put it to work toward a specific use case.
Jordan Steiger
Thank you both so much for being here today. I think this is such a great opportunity just to share some of the really innovative work that's coming out of Duke right now and spreading across the country. I think this is just an incredible example of how we can kind of get ahead of the mental health crisis that we are all hearing about and experiencing every day. So thank you both for the work that you're doing to make mental health care better for people all across the country.
Dr. Jonathan Posner
Absolutely. Thank you for having us and for your great questions.
Dr. Matthew Engelhard
It's been a pleasure. Thanks for having us.
Podcast Host
Thanks for listening to Advancing Health. Please subscribe and rate us 5 stars on Apple Podcast, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
Episode: The New Model Predicting Teen Mental Health Risks
Date: May 20, 2026
Host: Jordan Steiger, Director of Behavioral Health and Violence Prevention, American Hospital Association
Guests:
This episode dives into the Duke Predictive Model of Adolescent Mental Health (Duke PMA), an automated AI tool designed to identify teenagers at elevated risk of developing psychiatric illness within the next year. Host Jordan Steiger explores with Drs. Posner and Engelhard how the model functions, its potential for transforming early intervention in behavioral health, current research progress, opportunities and challenges in real-world deployment (especially in rural settings), and future prospects for AI in mental health care.
[01:26–02:42]
Notable Quote:
“It will tell me that the kid that I'm evaluating who seems stable today actually has an 80% chance or a 90% chance of developing a psychiatric illness in the next year. And a key contributor to that might be poor sleep.”
— Dr. Jonathan Posner [02:08]
[02:58–03:31]
Notable Quote:
“Other things like family history of psychiatric illness are more challenging to intervene on.”
— Dr. Jonathan Posner [03:21]
[03:40–05:05]
Notable Quote:
“AI tools are really good at being able to combine different types of information together... again, to enhance our ability to make the best predictions that we can.”
— Dr. Matthew Engelhard [04:34]
[06:08–07:42]
Notable Quote:
“We're not making the claim that the Duke PMA could do an assessment better than a trained professional. It's just that it can do it much more efficiently. And those trained professionals aren't available in lots of settings.”
— Dr. Jonathan Posner [07:26]
[08:02–10:30]
Notable Quote:
“The last thing we want to do is identify a child at being high risk, but then not having any resources for them, not being able to refer them to a provider.”
— Dr. Jonathan Posner [09:48]
[10:35–12:29]
Notable Quote:
“How do adolescents use of their digital devices... contribute to development of mental health distress?”
— Dr. Matthew Engelhard [11:04]
[13:06–14:44]
Notable Quotes:
“By using a global measure, it can be applied essentially to all kids.”
— Dr. Jonathan Posner [13:54]
“It puts us in a position to give people the help they need. It's also enhanced our ability to understand what risk factors contribute.”
— Dr. Matthew Engelhard [14:36]
[15:19–17:15]
Notable Quote:
“Our model is in fact available in a public repository right now, and we are happy to work with folks... and put it to work toward a specific use case.”
— Dr. Matthew Engelhard [17:02]
On Proactive Psychiatry:
“The goal is really to move psychiatry into a model that's much more proactive and preventative.”
— Dr. Jonathan Posner [03:40]
On Parallel to Cardiac Risk:
“Essentially, all adults in the US get screened for cardiac risk ... we'd love to see something similar to that with mental health risk so that kids are identified as being high risk before the conditions have really taken root.”
— Dr. Jonathan Posner [08:09]
On Practicality:
“The entire battery of questions are being put onto an iPad. So in theory, a family comes to their primary care clinic, and while they're in the waiting room, they could be handed the iPad and answer all the questions, and then the risk prediction and the profile would be fed forward to the clinician who's about to see them.”
— Dr. Jonathan Posner [13:49]
This episode of Advancing Health frames the Duke PMA as a cutting-edge AI-driven tool poised to transform pediatric behavioral health through early identification and targeted intervention—especially in underserved communities. The conversation highlights both the promise and practical considerations of broad-based, technology-enabled mental health screening, emphasizing a future where early, preventive action becomes the standard of care.