
Actor Edward Norton portrays Pete Seeger in the new Bob Dylan biopic, "A Complete Unknown." His performance has been nominated for a Golden Globe and a Critics Choice Award, while the film is nominated for Best Picture at the Academy Awards.
Loading summary
Progressive Insurance
All of it is supported by Progressive Insurance. You chose to hit play on this podcast today. Smart choice. Make another smart choice with Auto Quote Explorer to compare rates for multiple car insurance companies all at once. Try it@progressive.com Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates not available in all states or situations. Prices vary based on how you buy. Listener supported WNYC Studios.
Alison Stewart
This is all of it on wnyc. I'm Alison Stewart. The Academy Awards ceremonies are coming up.
Progressive Insurance
On March 2, so in the meantime.
Alison Stewart
We'Re going to hear some of my conversations with a few of this year's.
Progressive Insurance
Nominees for Best Picture. Now we'll turn to A Complete Unknown. In addition to Best Picture, it is nominated for Best Sound and Best Costume Design, Best Adapted Screenplay. A Best Actor nod for Timothee Chalamet, who stars as Bob Dylan, and Best Supporting Actress nomination for Monica Barbaro as Joan Baez. My guest for this conversation is also individually nominated. Edward Norton is up for Best Supporting Actor for his role as Pete Seeger. And the film's director, James Mangold, has earned a Best Director nod as well. So let's get into our next conversation with Edward Norton.
Edward Norton
Once upon a time, you dress so fine. Do the bunch of time in your prime.
Alison Stewart
Then you. In the new film a Complete Unknown, we get a glimpse of the enigma of Bob Dylan through the musicians and the love interest who entered his orbit in the early 60s up until the moment he went electric. The film begins in 1961 as Dylan makes his way to New York. He meets his ailing idol, Woody Guthrie, and soon encounters folk musician Pete Seeger, played by my next guest, Edward Norton. In a performance that was nominated for a Critic's Choice and a Golden Globe Award. We see Dylan develop into a person who absorbs those around him, from the earnest singers like Seeger to the more ID like Johnny Cash. And it's an interesting watch for New Yorkers. We get to see the city during a moment in time. Some of you listening may recall that. And not a lot of the action. Actually, a lot of the action takes place five minutes from our studios. I'm really glad to speak with Ed Norton. Hi, Edward.
Edward Norton
Edward, thanks. Yeah, good to be here.
Alison Stewart
Which do you prefer, Ed or Edward?
Edward Norton
My dad's Ed, and he might be listening. So he's here in the Village. We're all in the Village today.
Alison Stewart
What was challenging or rewarding for you in playing Pete Seeger in particular?
Edward Norton
Well, you know, I moved. I moved to the village in 1991 when I was 21 years old. I honestly song to Woody Dylan's first original song and his first record was. It was part of the soundtrack of my own personal kind of mythology. Moving to New York and thinking about the actors and musicians I loved and wanting to step into their footsteps. It's. It's. It. So. And Pete Seeger, if, you know, if you came up as an artist in New York, you. Pete Seeger is one of the, you know, the Olympians. He. He. And not. Not. Not necessarily because you have to be a folk fan. He just was known as one of the. The artists who made a difference. You know, he was one of the artists who. Pete. Pete Seeger was the folk singer who helped clean up the Hudson River. You know, he was the. He was the singer who answered Martin Luther King's postcards and went to the south to play in the civil rights marches in 1958, you know, and was on the Selma march and wrote We Shall Overcome. And it just. He was. He was at the absolute apogee of. Of artist as activist, artist as humanitarian, artist as environmentalist. And if you were even glancingly interested in those issues and the idea of artists as citizens, he's. He really is like one of. He's like Gandalf, you know, And. And so I had a lot of admiration for him. And because I am interested in music and play guitar and stuff, you. You knew. Pete Seeger also was this formidable virtuoso banjo and guitar player and kind of, you know, one of the greats. And I grew up with my mom's, you know, Peter, Paul and Mary records, and you would see that Pete Seeger wrote Where have all the Flowers Gone and if I Had a Hammer and all these things. So I knew a lot about him, and I knew maybe even more about Dylan. But in some ways, I'd say it was. In some ways I say it put a burden on the idea of doing a film about them because I. I held them in such a mythological status. Sometimes you almost feel it's heretical to try to, like, represent these people, you know, because they're so iconic, so musically virtuoso. And. And Jim. Jim Mangold, who is a wonderful director, you know, he was really articulate in talking about why he wanted to look at this brief period where these people were colliding with each other. Young Bob Dylan, Pete Seeger, the veteran Joan Baez, the kind of princess of folk at the time. And. And how this emergent moment that was taking place largely in Greenwich Village produced this. This cultural flowering, this phenomenal moment of emergent talent that Dylan was The, in many ways the pinnacle of that, that ended up not just being kind of the punk rock, outsider cultural, you know, kind of form, but, but really playing a really substantial role in the political expression of a whole generation that wanted progressive change. And, and, and I think Jim's interest was anthropological and he was interested in, in the, the ways that these people were allies, competitors, lovers, got into arguments and the way that, that, that fertile, those fertile interactions produced this, this thing. And Dylan obviously is, you know, he's a global sort of cultural and literary icon almost. But I think Jim wanted to look at, you know, the idea of almost the innocent and aspirational kind of characteristic of that time.
Alison Stewart
Yeah, it's sort of interesting because Pete Seeger in the film is a traditionalist in the good sense of the word. And he's really appealing to Dylan's songwriting, sort of his great greater angels. And then you have Johnny Cash, who's sort of more ID like and pulling at Bob Dylan. What is it that Seeger wants for Dylan and for his talent?
Edward Norton
You know, I'm not sure I would. I'm not sure I even want to impose it. I'm going to say this, and I'm not trying to dodge the question, but, you know, one of the things that I think Dylan gave artists apart from the songs themselves is he gave us almost the impossible standard of the artist who defends, defends the right of the audience to come to their own interpretation of meaning. You know, when people would say, what do the songs mean? He would say, I wrote them. I don't know what they mean. You, you tell me what they mean. He would, he refused to unpack it before, you know, he was the magician and he wasn't going to show you the trick. I think there's a lot of ways you can interpret the relationships between a Pete Seeger and a Bob Dylan and a Joan Baez and a Bob Dylan. And, and they were paradoxical and multi dimensional. You know, you, I think that's what I love about what Jim's done is he doesn't, he doesn't take a side per se or, or cast a value judgment on one type of integrity versus another type of integrity. And Seeger's integrity was legendary. The type of integrity Dylan had as an artist who follows his own line is, is something that's also admirable for, for different reasons. And, and they weren't the same and they were allies and then they, and then they kind of parted ways. But, but I think letting the audience kind of feel what they align with and what they relate to and is, is a big part of why we're doing it, you know, So I, I have, I have some of my own thoughts about it, but I think, but I think part of the, part of the beauty of it is the paradoxes and the, the things that, you know, because people can be allies and still get into arguments, you know, and people can be lovers and still be competitors. And that's, that's what I think makes it rich and juicy and human and, and, and relatable even if you're not a folk singer. Right.
Alison Stewart
Pete Singer, of course, a longtime New Yorker and he appeared on WNYC a number of times. We found an appearance from 1941.
Edward Norton
Oh, wow.
Alison Stewart
In which he talked about his banjo playing. Let's listen.
Pete Seeger
That five string banjo you heard was played by Pete Sega. Pete's been a member of the American square dance group for some time. He's just come back from a trip down the South. He's brought back with him some swell folk tunes. Say, Pete, you don't see many five spring banjos today, do you? Why no, you don't. You see, the banjo is one of the few really Native American instruments. The five string banjo is the kind they used to play in the old minstrel show 75 years ago. And I've heard tell that it was developed by Negro slaves who were brought over from Africa. And when the old minstrel shows died out, the five string banjos became less and less common. So now they're found mostly down in secluded sections of the South. What do you say, Pete? Play as one of the tunes you picked up on your trip. Okay, here's one called John Hardy and that's Pete Seeger.
Alison Stewart
You can of course talk to Rhiannon Giddens about banjos. That's an amazing African American instrument. When you were playing, it was you playing the banjo. Is that true, Edward?
Edward Norton
Yeah. I mean, I have a grounding in guitar and was able to, I was able to work with some phenomenal professional banjo players. Although I will say there's something really interesting, which is Pete Seeger played a. He was a virtuoso. He could play Beethoven's Ode to Joy on the banjo and, and, and play bluegrass and play just about everything. But he played often in this style called claw hammer and it's not as popular today and it's hard to find people. There were some, you know, brilliant banjo players who can't totally work out sometimes some of the things he was playing. But because I had a background in guitar, I was I was able to put a lot of focus onto a very few of his, a very few of his things. And it was heart. Banjo is really difficult. I find it difficult. And, and, and there are aspects, I don't want to say all of our techniques and trickery, but yes, we, we, we played our songs live. I mean, we, we, we all felt that there is such a different quality to your voice when you're singing in a large space for, for a real audience. And so we, we wanted to capture the core of the performances live. And, and it was just, it was the right thing to do. The thing I, the thing I learned, we all learned. And Timothy is, you know, brilliant in his musical renderings of Dylan songs, but you just realize Joan Baez and Bob Dylan and Pete Seeger, they were people who played unadorned. And they make it look easy, they make it look simple. And when you try to recreate what they do, you really realize the depth of their talent, you know, the depth of their vocal control, their breath control, the sophistication of what they're playing. It's, it's, it was kind of wondrous for all of us and I think. But, you know, I, I don't think you'll find a movie this year with more mu. With more music in it. It's got a lot of, of really great music in it. Not in a, not like being a musical, but more because these people were living in music. They were, they were expressing themselves through music.
Alison Stewart
You know, when you think about living in New York in the early 60s, what part of it would you have really liked, like living in Greenwich village in the 60s?
Edward Norton
I, I, you have this feeling that there was still a kind of a radical anti commercialism. Right? They're just people. You know, there's a great line. In one documentary I saw Bobby Neuwirth, the musician and painter who was friends with Dylan, he says, back then, you know, nobody said, how many records have you sold? They said, have you got anything to say? You know, and you get this feeling that there was an intense, an intense interest in, in and in the authenticity of the work as opposed to its commercial value. And I think we're in this period in American life where I feel like the addiction to maximization of just about everything is expressing itself, you know, where we're in real danger, I think, of art being completely subsumed by the idea of content and it's collateral value. You know, it just, it, it seems like there was a really interesting gravitational pull in the village of, of artists. Of all different stripes who were here to really kind of be at the center of a serious conversation. And that, that sounds appealing to me. But you know, it's funny, I, I mean honestly, this is, this is a New York station and it's a good New York detail. But I used to, when I was 22 and doing plays on East 4th street or I would go see downtown theater, see the Worcester Group or whatever. I remember seeing Willem Dafoe in the Worcester Group, who I later got to work with and, and I would wander up to McDougal street and there was a place that's still there called La Lanterna de Vittorio, just below Washington Square park on McDougal on the, on the west side of the street. And that was like my go to place for taking a date after a play and having a beer and, and a piece of pie or whatever. And I found out in the course making this movie that that was Pete Seeger's house. That was where Pete Seeger lived with his wife Toshi when they were first married. Probably right after that interview you just played. It was her parents house. Her father was a Japanese man who did scenic design for the Provincetown Playhouse, which was right next door. And they lived on the first floor, which is where the restaurant is. And I had this like, you know, flooding realization that for years when I was in my early 20s, I used to sit in the evening by the fireplace in what had been Pete Seeger's bedroom, which is amazing. And it's still there. You could, you can go to that restaurant today. And, and if you go, you're in, you're in Pete Seeger and Toshi Seeger's old in law's house before they moved up to Beacon where they, where they famously lived. And you know, it's like that's the great thing about Greenwich Village. And I mean, I'm looking out across it now and it's sort of like, you know, we're losing some things here and there, but there is still, there's such an incredible, like when you're walking around in the Village, you're, you're passing the ghosts of so many, so many amazing people. And I think it's what I still love about living here.
Alison Stewart
That was my conversation with Edward Norton, who plays Pete Seeger in A Complete Unknown, a Best Picture nominated film that follows the early days of Bob Dylan. After the break, we'll hear from director Walter Salas and actor Fernanda Torres, who took home a Golden Globe for her performance in the new Brazilian film I'm still here.
Progressive Insurance
It's about a woman determined to find out what happened to her husband who who disappeared during Brazil's military dictatorship. Stick around.
Ira Flatow
This is Ira Flato, host of Science Friday. For over 30 years, the science Friday team has been reporting high quality science and technology news, making science fun for curious people by covering everything from the outer reaches of space to to the rapidly changing world of AI to the tiniest microbes in our bodies. Audiences trust our show because they know we're driven by a mission to inform and serve listeners first and foremost with important news they won't get anywhere else. And our sponsors benefit from that halo effect. For more information on becoming a sponsor, visit sponsorship.wnyc.org.
Podcast Information:
Release Date: February 17, 2025
Focus: This episode centers on the film "A Complete Unknown," a Best Picture nominee that offers an intimate portrayal of Bob Dylan's formative years. The film delves into Dylan's interactions with iconic folk musicians like Pete Seeger and Joan Baez, leading up to his pivotal moment of "going electric." The episode features a detailed conversation with Edward Norton, who portrays Pete Seeger in the film.
Timestamp: 01:36 – 15:57
Alison Stewart introduces Edward Norton's role as Pete Seeger, highlighting the character's significance not only in the film's narrative but also in the broader cultural and political movements of the 1960s.
Edward Norton:
"Pete Seeger is one of the Olympians... artist as activist, artist as humanitarian, artist as environmentalist."
[02:51]
Norton elaborates on Seeger's multifaceted legacy, emphasizing his contributions to environmentalism, civil rights, and music. He reflects on the challenge of embodying such an iconic and revered figure, acknowledging the mythological status Seeger holds in the public consciousness.
Norton discusses the personal and artistic challenges of portraying Pete Seeger, including the responsibility of representing a beloved and influential artist accurately.
Edward Norton:
"Sometimes you almost feel it's heretical to try to represent these people, you know, because they're so iconic, so musically virtuoso."
[05:10]
He praises director James Mangold for his anthropological approach to the story, focusing on the interactions and relationships among the characters rather than casting judgments on their differing forms of integrity.
Edward Norton:
"Jim Mangold... his interest was anthropological and he was interested in the ways that these people were allies, competitors, lovers, got into arguments and the way that, that fertile, those fertile interactions produced this, this thing."
[06:46]
Norton delves into the musical elements of the film, discussing his preparation for playing the banjo and his admiration for Seeger's virtuosity.
Edward Norton:
"Pete Seeger played... Beethoven's Ode to Joy on the banjo and, and, and play bluegrass and play just about everything."
[10:20]
He shares insights into the technical demands of playing the banjo, acknowledging the difficulty of capturing Seeger's signature claw hammer style. Norton's dedication to authenticity is evident as he recounts practicing extensively to honor Seeger's musical prowess.
Edward Norton:
"Banjo is really difficult. I find it difficult... we played our songs live. We all felt that there is such a different quality to your voice when you're singing in a large space for, for a real audience."
[10:20]
Norton reflects on the cultural milieu of Greenwich Village in the early 1960s, highlighting the area's anti-commercialism and the genuine interest in authentic artistic expression over commercial success.
Edward Norton:
"Nobody said, how many records have you sold? They said, have you got anything to say?"
[12:41]
He contrasts this with contemporary trends, expressing concern over the current obsession with maximization and the potential subsumption of art by commercial interests.
Edward Norton:
"We're in real danger, I think, of art being completely subsumed by the idea of content and its collateral value."
[12:41]
Norton shares a personal connection to Greenwich Village, recounting his memories of the area and a serendipitous discovery about Pete Seeger's former residence.
Edward Norton:
"When you go, you're passing the ghosts of so many, so many amazing people."
[15:57]
This poignant moment underscores the enduring legacy of artists like Seeger in the cultural fabric of New York City.
Timestamp: 09:10 – 12:29
Alison Stewart plays a 1941 clip featuring Pete Seeger discussing the five-string banjo, shedding light on the instrument's origins and its cultural significance.
Pete Seeger:
"The banjo is one of the few really Native American instruments. The five string banjos are found mostly down in secluded sections of the South."
[09:20]
Norton discusses the importance of live performances and the authentic representation of music in the film, emphasizing the depth and sophistication of Seeger's and Dylan's musical talents.
Edward Norton:
"Joan Baez and Bob Dylan and Pete Seeger... they make it look easy, they make it look simple... you really realize the depth of their talent."
[12:29]
He highlights the film's rich musical landscape, noting that while it isn't a traditional musical, the characters' lives are deeply intertwined with music as a form of self-expression and political activism.
Timestamp: 12:29 – 15:57
Norton narrates his experiences living in Greenwich Village, capturing the area's enduring artistic spirit and its role as a hub for intellectual and creative exchange.
Edward Norton:
"There's such an incredible, like when you're walking around in the Village, you're passing the ghosts of so many, so many amazing people. And I think it's what I still love about living here."
[15:57]
He recounts discovering that a favorite local restaurant was formerly Pete Seeger's residence, reinforcing the deep historical and cultural ties present in the Village.
Edward Norton:
"I had this like, you know, flooding realization that for years when I was in my early 20s, I used to sit in the evening by the fireplace in what had been Pete Seeger's bedroom."
[15:57]
This revelation serves as a tangible connection between Norton's personal history and the film's narrative, highlighting the Village's role in nurturing influential artists.
In this episode of All Of It, Alison Stewart provides listeners with an insightful exploration of the film "A Complete Unknown," enriched by Edward Norton's thoughtful and reflective conversation. Through Norton's portrayal of Pete Seeger, the episode delves into the intricate dynamics of artistic integrity, political activism, and the enduring cultural legacy of Greenwich Village. By intertwining personal anecdotes, historical context, and musical authenticity, the discussion offers a comprehensive understanding of the film's significance and its portrayal of one of America's most iconic cultural moments.
Notable Quotes:
Edward Norton ([02:51]):
"Pete Seeger is one of the Olympians... artist as activist, artist as humanitarian, artist as environmentalist."
Alison Stewart ([12:41]):
"Nobody said, how many records have you sold? They said, have you got anything to say?"
Edward Norton ([12:41]):
"We're in real danger, I think, of art being completely subsumed by the idea of content and its collateral value."
Edward Norton ([15:57]):
"There's such an incredible, like when you're walking around in the Village, you're passing the ghosts of so many, so many amazing people."
This detailed summary encapsulates the essence of the episode, providing a comprehensive overview of the discussions, insights, and thematic explorations presented by Alison Stewart and her guest, Edward Norton. It serves as a valuable resource for listeners seeking to understand the cultural and historical nuances of "A Complete Unknown" and its depiction of a pivotal era in American music and activism.