← All TWiT.tv Shows (Audio)
Loading summary
Transcript667 lines
- [00:00]
A
It's time for Intelligent Machines. Paris Martineau has the week off. Jeff Jarvis is here, though, and Mike Elgin joins us as we talk to Robert Tirsek. He's talking about the role of AI in motion pictures. He's been advising motion picture companies. He says Hollywood has to get with the program. That's coming up next on Intelligent Machines, podcasts you love from people you trust. This is twit. This is Intelligent Intelligent Machines with Jeff Jarvis and Paris Martineau, Episode 873, recorded Wednesday, June 3, 2026. Superman's mustache. It's time for Intelligent Machines, the show. We talk about the latest in AI robotics and all the smart things surrounding us these days. Mr. Professor Emeritus Jeff Jarvis, the emeritus professor of Journalistic innovation at the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at the City University of Newark, is here, author of Hot Type, which he was. You were in a hot, sweaty studio recording earlier this week, and I'm two
- [01:10]
B
thirds of the way through.
- [01:11]
A
You're not even done?
- [01:12]
B
No. 100 pages a day is not a bad pace, is it?
- [01:16]
A
How many pages are there?
- [01:17]
B
300.
- [01:18]
A
Maybe write fewer pages next time.
- [01:20]
B
Oh, and I, and I do lapse into Mark Twain tonight.
- [01:24]
A
I quote him when he said, I'm. We were texting earlier this week. He said, I'm in the studio. I said, well, I hope you do Hal Holbrook when you do the Mark Twain quotes. So you talk like this a little bit.
- [01:36]
B
I was on earlier with Jason Howell and he, and I read a bit of it for him and he had no idea what I was doing.
- [01:43]
A
Well, because he's a younger fellow.
- [01:44]
B
He's younger. Yeah.
- [01:46]
A
We're the gray hairs in the, in the show.
- [01:48]
B
Let me see here. Hold on a second here. Hold on a second here.
- [01:50]
A
You're Hal Hobrook, your best Hal Hobrook.
- [01:52]
B
It was a wretchedly printed little sheet, being very vague and pale in spots and in other spots so caked with ink is to be hardly decipherable. The first column was occupied by original poetry of the sappiest description. The next four were occupied by selected story, which was as sappy as the poetry. The remaining column of the first page was made up of short paragraphs of vapid, heartbreaking, infuriating rot entitled wit and humor.
- [02:17]
A
Nice. You need a little cigar in your hand.
- [02:20]
B
I got the white hair.
- [02:23]
A
Other than that, it's great. Also with us, Paris has the week off again. She is on deadline filing a very complicated story for Consumer Reports, which we'll hear all about soon. But I'm thrilled to have Mike Elgin joining us. He does a podcast about AI and also a newsletter, MachineSociety. AI, longtime friend of the network. Also our host for those great gastro nomad adventures. You're in California, though, today?
- [02:49]
C
I am California in southern Silicon Valley, Leo.
- [02:53]
A
And I'm in way northern Silicon Valley. So we're on the opposite ends.
- [02:57]
C
Yeah, that's right. I just arrived. 2:00 clock this morning. Something like that.
- [03:01]
A
Wow.
- [03:02]
C
Where I'd been since March.
- [03:04]
A
Thank you. I appreciate your. You're doing this with us.
- [03:07]
C
My pleasure.
- [03:08]
A
He's doing the Schengen Shuffle.
- [03:09]
C
He said the Schengen Shuffle. It's not a dance move, folks. It's just leaving the Schengen area so I don't get. Get caught. We've. We've extended the Schengen area. It's 90 days every 180 days. Twice. We've, we've ex. We've overstayed it by a day. And they wag their finger at you and they lecture you, but so far, no. Fine.
- [03:28]
A
So have you ever thought of maybe, you know, getting a Portuguese passport or some, you know, Schengen passport so you
- [03:33]
C
can stay a million times, but we're never. We're never there long enough. I mean, it's really bureaucratic and it takes a long time. And we have thought about it. We still may do it someday, and that would solve a lot of problems for us.
- [03:45]
A
I was watching a YouTube video on the top five places to escape the US and I think the top one was Georgia, which you turned me on to. You spent time in Tbilisi, and it's where wine was invented 8,000 years ago.
- [03:58]
C
That sells me, according to the archaeological record. And also certain kinds of bread were invented there. We're just learning. But that's. I'm surprised because nobody speaks English.
- [04:09]
B
You had me at one. Georgia.
- [04:11]
A
What is the language of Georgia?
- [04:13]
C
Georgian. And only four.
- [04:15]
A
I can speak Georgian. I know how to speak Georgian perfectly.
- [04:18]
D
Good.
- [04:18]
C
No, that's the big Georgia. Our state of Georgia is. Is much larger than the country Georgia, which has 4 million residents. They have their own Alphabet, which is not related to any other Alphabet, and their own language, which is unrelated. And so it's like you got to learn Georgian to live there. So that's kind of a tall order.
- [04:34]
A
That's confusing. Hey, I want to welcome our guest for the first segment. As always, we'd like to interview somebody who's a mover and shaker in the world of AI. And that is absolutely the case with Robert Tirsek. He is a Futurist. He's an author with an incredible resume. Creative director at mtv back in the day when.
- [04:53]
D
Back when MTV was cool, when we
- [04:55]
A
wanted it, when it played music and stuff.
- [04:58]
D
That's right.
- [04:59]
A
Wow, that's amazing. You worked at Sony Pictures. You worked with Oprah's own network for digital strategy. Wrote a book that if people still quote all the time, vaporized Solid Strategies for Success in a Dematerialized World. And now we are living in that dematerialized world, aren't we?
- [05:20]
D
100%, Leo. When I wrote that book, I thought I was writing about the peak of something. I didn't realize I was writing about the very beginning of a trend that was going to reshape not just the world that we live in, but also. And seemingly the whole economy. But that's where we are.
- [05:33]
A
You spend a lot of time now talking about AI in Hollywood. In fact, we were before the show talking about an Amazon announcement at a movie event on a backlot. Tell us. On the lot, beyond the lot.
- [05:48]
D
Yeah. Now the event is AI on the lot, which has now emerged as, like, the preeminent gathering of people that are interested in using artificial intelligence to tell cinematic stories.
- [05:58]
A
Wait a minute. Doesn't Hollywood hate AI?
- [06:00]
D
Well, it's a controversial topic. I think what I would say is Hollywood's going through its own version of Elizabeth Kubler Ross's cycle of grief as they kind of watch the old business model of the 20th century fade away. You know, remember in the last 10 years, we've seen two of the biggest studios get merged into other. You know, these companies have been around for more than 100 years, managing the creative process. One by one, they're getting acquired by tech companies or telecoms companies. Disney is the only one that's left independent. And as that happens, they change. It transforms those companies. At the same time, we've also seen a tremendous cutback in the number of shows. We reached Peak TV in 2023. There were about 600 shows, scripted shows in production. Now we're down to about 490. So there's a number of shows. That means it comes with layoffs, job loss, and runaway production. A lot of productions have moved outside of Los Angeles. So the feeling here is kind of existential dread and fear. As I say, they're kind of a morning process. And into the mix we throw AI and that's why it's so incendiary, because people are already defensive. Now, I should point out, nobody's lost their job to AI yet in the movie business, but it's clearly going to have an impact and that's what AI and a lot is there to do. It's there to teach people how to use it and create a community around users and also what's coming next. And what they announced blew my mind, Leo. It was really astonishing.
- [07:14]
A
In a good way.
- [07:15]
D
Yeah. So I didn't expect this at all. It was held at the Culver Studios where you and I both had offices back in the day when they were under other management. Now those office, now that studio is owned by Amazon. That's where Amazon Prime TV and MGM Studios are set up and they completely rebuilt the place. It's state of the art studio now. It's very nice. And so because it was there, Amazon had the opening keynote statement. And Albert Chang is now the newly admitted vice president of AI Studios. For Amazon, this is a big deal. This is the first major motion picture company that has launched an AI studio. And they're there to do two things. One is to facilitate MGM Studios. As their directors want to learn more about AI, they can facilitate those productions. But more importantly, what Albert announced is a new initiative, an AI Creators fund, where they're actually funding the development and production of original series. They're doing that in partnership with AWS for infrastructure and Brickyard for all the AI models. They've created a rich ecosystem of partners that includes app developers and all the AI model companies, or many of them that'll probably grow in the future. But most importantly, they're funding creative people who have ideas and they actually lined up some outstanding talent. They announced that three of their pilot episodes have been picked up by Amazon prime for video streaming. So they're actually going into series production. This will be the first TV shows in the US that are produced with artificial intelligence. So that was quite a big announcement. I was really blown away because I didn't expect it to be that big of a story.
- [08:42]
B
So you say they're made with AI?
- [08:44]
A
Yes.
- [08:45]
B
How much is made? Yeah. What. What does these mean?
- [08:47]
D
Yeah, great question. So these are animated series that will be generated with AI. I don't know which models are using. They're probably going to be different because it's three different animators. And I would say the approach that most of Hollywood is taking is a hybrid approach where they fuse AI into the production process in some way so that's less disruptive to the workforce. It's easier for people to understand because it doesn't upset that classic production, you know, cycle, the left to right cycle of development, pre production, principal photography and post Production. To my mind, that doesn't take full advantage of what AI is capable of, but maybe it's a little early for that.
- [09:23]
A
This reminds me of. And this is your era. My era too. In the early 90s, there was a TV show called Reboot that was the first CGI TV animated show. And it generated both a lot of interest and a lot of hate.
- [09:38]
D
Yeah, and that's precisely what happened in this case as well. So, unfortunately, no sooner had Amazon made that announcement and Albert Cheng did a masterful job of unveiling that, but no sooner had he made the announcement and named the three animators that he was going to be working with on those series, then those folks started to get attacked in social media by people who are resisting AI. There's a pretty loud and vocal anti AI group right now. So they didn't come after Amazon. Of course, they are cowards. They came after the individual artists. One of the artists, Jorge Gutierrez, who was a well respected Mexican American animator, he decided to drop out of the project the next day. By Friday, he dropped out. And that's a real shame because one of the goals they had set was to bring production back to la. As I mentioned, runaway production is a big issue here. It's cheaper to produce almost anywhere else. And so Albert Chang's vision is that AI makes it possible for a smaller crew to work faster, that's better done locally. He saw this as a way to create more production jobs in la. And candidly, there's a lot of animators looking for work. But now, thanks to the AI haters, unfortunately, some of those jobs are not going to be created. And I think it's a real own goal. Like, I don't think that they succeeded anything. They're certainly not going to stop Amazon from using artificial intelligence. They're not going to stop any of the motion picture companies from adopting it. The other big news here that's worth hearing about, I think I should mention, is you recall in 2023 we had strikes where, you know, the Writers Guild and the Screen Actors Guild went on strike because they could not reach an agreement with the Producers Association. There were a number of issues there. Some of them were workplace safety or work conditions. Some of them were pay and residuals. But a principal issue was artificial intelligence and they could not come to terms. So everybody went on strike. And what happened, of course, is it's not just the writers and actors who are on strike. It shut the whole city down. So, you know, even the union crews and the teamsters, all the productions stopped every TV show that was in production stopped. The studios eventually started running out of shows for their streaming services. Took six months. It closed the city down. We still haven't recovered entirely from that, from that incident. Well, that was a three year deal. So now this year, 2026, three years later, it was time for renewals. And I was thinking, oh my gosh, are we gonna have another round of strikes? As it happens, no. In fact, the Writers Guild was able to work out their differences very quickly this time. And they got what they needed, the protection they sought, the control that they sought over AI. So they got what they needed from the producers, and in exchange, the producers got a four year deal. And now here's the most amazing thing, Leo. The screen actors who were so vehemently opposed to synthetic actors, you know, virtual, let's say AI actors, generated actors, they were completely opposed to that. They've been very loud and outspoken about. Remember that stunt, Tilly Norwood last year? So the virtual character, they were very outspoken and very dismissive of that. Well, the new SAG agreement with the AMPTP allows for synthetic actors with certain conditions, certain constraints. They're going to have to work closely with the guild to get permission to do this. But they've opened the door now to synthetic actors acting alongside humans. This is a big deal. I mean, this is real progress. And I don't see it as bad or as a threat. I see this as Hollywood reinventing itself because the old business model is broken. We know that the cost structure is bloated. It's. They can't seem to get under control. And the solution so far has been to cut the number of shows or move them overseas where they can be produced cheaper. This is a way to bring production back and take advantage of the advantages of AI and there are many, many affordances of AI that people should consider.
- [13:07]
C
Yeah. To expand on what you're saying, people think of AI in movies and they think, well, it's just going to be Will Smith eating spaghetti until the end of time or something like that. But actually there's like a, you know, 10,000 different things that people do to make movies, and many of those can be augmented or improved or replaced by AI. For example, Martin Scorsese is pro AI. He's, he's a, an advisor and a partner of Black Forest Labs, and he's already using it for things like pre visualization. Now this is, this is a process that doesn't even touch what you see on the screen, but it helps. It's use it the same way we're all using it, which is to think through problems, to, to understand and visualize things. And, and that's just one of a million different things. And the other point I wanted to make, and I'm sure you agree with this, the audience will decide what's acceptable and what isn't going forward. With AI for example, when they removed Superman's mustache. Right. Not through AI but they, you know, they, they mess around with that and they got hammered by the audience. The audience will hammer the bad uses of this stuff and the will be rewarded. And you know, there will always be zero AI movies. If you look at Top Gun, Maverick or F1, one of the things that were, that everybody loved about those movies was that they didn't use any cgi. These are action, you know, fast moving action movies where they strapped cameras in creative ways to fast moving vehicles. And it was thrilling. Right, and it was thrilling because it didn't have CGI or, or digital effects.
- [14:37]
D
That's what they say. Yeah, that's what they tell you. The fact is that every feature is touched by cgi. Computer graphics are integrated and they're just so good that people don't notice.
- [14:46]
A
That's the question is, will people even know that AI is.
- [14:50]
D
No.
- [14:50]
C
The point is Spectrum. It's a spectrum.
- [14:52]
D
Yeah. In two years, Leo, every film is going to have AI integrated in some way. Like Mike said, it'll be either in the screenplay development process or the evaluation of the screenplay or pre production visuals or character design or world design or some other aspect of design before you shoot. Pre visualization is important because it means with AI you can actually shoot your movie before you shoot your movie. Right. So some, some crews and cast will not want to work with. Fair enough. Right. That's going to be their creative choice. But it still means they can still use AI to figure out what the heck they're doing before they get to the set and design the shots so carefully that what they're doing on stage will be done much more efficiently. And that's what we have to do to get cost under control. People don't realize this, but the average movie costs about $100 million. So a 90 minute film costs about $100 million. That's about a million dollars a minute. That's a lot of money. The average high end Netflix episode, let's say a show like Wednesday costs 20 million an episode. That's $300,000 a year.
- [15:43]
A
Wednesday cost 20 million.
- [15:44]
D
And that's when, when Game of Thrones did that 10 years ago, it was a record. Now It's a norm. Like now a bunch of mediocre shows cost 20 million. That's $300,000 per minute.
- [15:53]
A
Okay, can they make that money back or is that untenable?
- [15:56]
D
They do. They clearly do. Well, it's not sustainable in the sense that these streaming services are not all making money. Most of them are losing money. So it's not right. So the solution there is to do fewer but more expensive productions. It's not a sustainable solution. But let me put it in contrast with you. When I started Newer studios a couple of years ago, this is an AI studio that's based up in Mont. We were able to produce at about $2,000 per minute. Today we've got that under $1,000aminute. By the end of this year It'll be under $300aminute. And I thought that was remarkable because that's like four orders of magnitude cheaper than a motion picture minute. But that's nothing. In China today, the microdramas have all switched to using AI workflows entirely. AI crew, cast, everything is AI and they're producing at $30aminute. That's a 3000x cost advantage over Hollywood's motion pictures. So for people who say we're never going to use AI, never is a very long time when you have a 3000x cost advantage. You have no choice but to embrace this technology. And meanwhile the quality is getting better and better. If you haven't looked yet at Google's Gemini Omni, you've got to go check it out because the quality is mind blowingly good now. It's not perfect. It's still uncanny. Valley. There's, there's still work to do. I'm not out here to be a cheerleader. The point is that it's pretty evident that just in a space of four years they've improved it so much to just a couple more years out. It will be indistinguishable to most people. At which point everyone's going to use it.
- [17:20]
B
And what strikes me, Robert, that's so important about this is that it's going to bring in other people who can now tell their stories that they otherwise couldn't have told. That they didn't have the money, they didn't have the connections, they couldn't get through the gauntlet.
- [17:33]
D
I'm with you on a call with someone who's working in Vietnam and there are countries all over the world. I spent a lot of time in my career in Southeast Asia. Everyone there, every Asian tiger country has recognized that South Korea has Done something remarkable before the pandemic. If I told you that a Korean movie was going to win an Oscar or that a Korean show would be the number one show on Netflix, or that a Korean pop band we the most popular band in the world, you would have laughed at me today. Those are facts. Right.
- [18:00]
A
So everybody else btc, you got the squid game. Yeah.
- [18:04]
D
So if you go to, if you go to Taiwan or the Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, these countries have a lot of great storytellers. They have a lot of great cultural lore. What they don't have is a lot of people who speak English the way Californians do. Well, with AI, you could easily produce a show there and then revoice the whole thing in American English. Actually change the actors and make them into American looking actors. What's going to happen now is the one way flow of content from the United States to other countries is going to be reversed. The US will become an import territory for products that are made elsewhere. This is going to cause Americans to work harder and be more competitive. I think it's going to be a good thing for story place, I think.
- [18:39]
B
And we're going to get more diversity of perspective and lived experience from around the world.
- [18:43]
D
You got it.
- [18:44]
A
But what about all the craftspeople, the talented people who will be out of work? Is there an answer for them?
- [18:49]
D
So I don't buy it. I know people are worried about that scenario. There's no evidence of that happening. In fact, it's going the opposite way. If you use AI as I do every day, it creates a lot more work and it actually creates really interesting work.
- [19:00]
A
It can, yes, yes.
- [19:02]
D
So I don't think, I don't think it's going to displace people now. It's certainly true. If we're, you know, if we're not using a lot more crews and you know, then probably what are those people going to do? But these tools are accessible. Just to build on Jeff's point, anybody can teach themselves how to become competent in these tools in a matter of weeks, sometimes just a day or two, you can get, you can get some mastery.
- [19:20]
A
Right.
- [19:21]
D
So if you have a story to tell and everybody on a film crew thinks they're going to be a director, literally the script supervisor thinks she's going to be the next director. Right. So everybody's got a story to tell. There's no real barrier anymore. If you've got a story to tell, get out there and tell your story. I think we're going to see a thousand x increase in the number of scripted narratives that are being produced. And I think that's a good thing.
- [19:40]
A
You know, there's a lesson in YouTube with all this. That's exactly what happened at YouTube. It made it possible for anybody to create video and distribute it.
- [19:48]
B
Vidcon, man.
- [19:49]
A
And there's. There's bad content. But I think, I don't know who said it, maybe it was me that yes, you have more content, but you also have the. If the percentage stays the same of good content, you're going to have more good content at the same time. I just went to a movie called Backrooms on Friday night by a YouTuber. Yeah, it's a very interesting story. Kane Pixels, who took a liminal single, they call it a creepypasta from 4chan, turned it into a YouTube hit. 20 million downloads of the first video over several years, created a whole bunch of backrooms, kind of weird, creepy, liminal spaces, and got a deal with Hollywood. He's 20 years old, got a $10 million budget, built a 30,000 square foot set. By the way, it wasn't AI generated. He did his YouTube stuff with Blender, but this, he built a. He built a practical set and shot this movie. And I think over the Weekend was the fourth grossing horror film of all time. They made 80 million. More than $80 million in the first weekend I was there. Cain, the reason I know all about this is he's from Petaluma, he's from our town, and he was there on opening night. And my 24 year old, who, I didn't know it, but he had an Async Corp. Sticker on his car. I said, you know, he put it there a year ago. I said, what's that? He said, it's just some YouTube thing. He was so excited. He got his picture taken and at this. So that's one. But then there was another movie. Oh, and I can't remember the name.
- [21:19]
D
Obsession.
- [21:20]
A
Obsession, yeah.
- [21:21]
B
Yeah.
- [21:22]
A
This is a. The new generation of filmmakers. And they're coming from YouTube.
- [21:26]
D
No, and what's really important is Disney released a huge picture and a Star wars film and it flopped compared to this. So these films that are produced on a shoestring by indie producers that nobody's ever heard of, but they have a great story to tell. They're clobbering the blockbusters that we rely on so much to keep these voices.
- [21:42]
A
And there's clearly a lesson there for Hollywood, right?
- [21:45]
D
I mean, yeah, if Hollywood decides to back more independent voices and tell more unconventional stories, that's only good. What I can't Believe is that the green lit another Avengers movie. How many times do we have to see the same story? I know how it ends. The shiny thing is going to get caught by the Avengers.
- [22:03]
A
Stop with the Avengers.
- [22:04]
B
Do you think that will this back up and change the process? If you're a screenwriter, will you be expected to do a storyboard through AI or to visualize it more? Will it change the creative process at other levels?
- [22:21]
D
It will change the creative process with writers in particular. So these guys were the original, like, anti AI haters back in 2023. They were like, you know, chat GPT is a plagiarism machine and so on. Most writers that I know have come around now to try it because they've checked it out. Paul Schrader, famous film screenwriter who wrote Taxi Driver and another number of other films, he came out about a year and a half ago and said, I don't know why everybody's so against this stuff. It's actually quite great. I asked it to write a screenplay in the style of Paul Schrader.
- [22:48]
A
Oh, man.
- [22:48]
D
And I was pretty impressed. And he said, then I asked it to redo it in the voice of Quentin Tarantino. And then he just started going through all the writers he knew. He's like, it's actually pretty impressive. So he's not against it now? No writer will tell you that.
- [23:00]
A
But he already made his bundle. I mean, he doesn't. He's not at risk.
- [23:03]
D
He's in the zero F's business right now. But you know what? God bless. I think it's great that he's out there saying it. What he's doing is making safe space for a younger generation of writers to embrace this. Now, anybody who writes, including me, knows if you try to let the machine write for you, it's going to be boring, mediocre, terrible. You can't let it do that. But what it can do is it can help you structure plot, narrative plot points. It can keep continuity. It can fact check for you. So if you treat it like an assistant, I think it's quite useful. And it can really compress the creative cycle where you're trying to explore ideas because it generates ideas so fast. So there's benefit to it. Jeff, to your other part of your question, though, is the creative process. So we have a strange creative process here. The Hollywood motion picture production process hasn't changed in 100 years. You start with a script, a process of developing that script into a script that can be shot. Then you go into pre production. This is the planning cycle. And Sometimes there's pre visualization or some design elements that happen. Then you go into principal photography and now it's the domain of the director on the stage and you're shooting, you have real actors, okay, that finishes, they wrap that up. Now you have a bunch of film that goes over to the editors into post production and now we add special effects. But that process has really been established since the 1910s by a guy named Tom Ince, who was one of the original producers in the silent era. He was so impressed by Henry Ford and the assembly line that he mimicked the assembly line for motion pictures. He was like, we can systematize it. And the studios were looking for a way to. They didn't want to have to be dependent on labor. They were very worried about unions. And this is before the unions were organized. So they thought if we deskilled the jobs, we can prevent unionization from happening. So the studios adopted it. Well, they haven't changed in 100 years. That linear left to right process is actually a fatal flaw today. Because the problem with it is all the creative decisions are made up front in the pre production stages and then they're locked on the stage during principal photography or production. Well, where we're hiring most of the new people, these 70% of the new hires since the 1990s have been in post production. These are the most creative people that are being hired, the new hires. And they're the least empowered to do anything because all the creative decisions were locked in that linear left to right industrial process. Process AI is going to wipe that out. Because the great thing about artificial intelligence is you can change your mind, you can iterate and you can go crazy with it and iterate too much. Of course, we've all done that, right? You go down the rabbit hole and you do 47 drafts in an afternoon. But what's cool about AI is if you've ever edited anything, you find yourself in a edit bay and you're wishing that you got one more shot, a reverse angle reaction shot or just a different angle on a scene. You don't have it because the, the film crew shot it and they chuck it over the fence to you. In post production, you're stuck with what they shot. Well, with AI now you're never going to have that problem again. And in fact it gets even better. And this is one of the things we built at Neura Studios, the company I started. This is what we started with in mind. What if I get halfway through the production? I realized actually I don't like the Lead actor or the lead actress. I want to change that person. You can do it and you can do a global replace. Now this is mind bending, right? Because then if you think of it that way, you go, oh, what if I wanted to localize this film for an audience in India? Gee, well, then I'd love to be able to have all the actors speak Hindi. Oh, no, wait a minute. They also speak Tamil. Oh, wait, there's a thousand other dialects. I can re render the show and so I won't have a single show. A master. I'll end up with versions that are living, versions that are highly localized. This is all possible and it will happen. It's not.
- [26:22]
B
What does Nora do? Talk about Nora.
- [26:24]
D
Nora has built an end to end pipeline and workflow for animated series. So NeuroStudios. It's NeuraStudios AI they're based up in Canada and it's a bunch of machine learning experts who are experts in graphics. And the company zeroed in on animation for the simple reason that live action today still is pretty uncanny valley. And I think that's going to persist for a couple more years. You can notice it. And if it's even a little bit uncanny Valley, it kind of is off putting. It jolts you out of the narrative and so you can't really compare commit to the story. But we're a lot more forgiving about what we'll accept.
- [26:59]
A
Yeah, Pixar knew this. That's why they, they didn't have humans in Toy Story. They had toys in Toy Story. Yeah.
- [27:05]
D
And what AI is great at is animation. Right now. You can animate any style. I don't want to claim that Neuro's the only company focused. Of course not. There's a hundred other companies competing on this. But we, what we just saw, for instance, I saw a demo by Google of Gemini Omni. That's their new model. It's really remarkable. And they're very sensitive, everyone's very sensitive to this idea of artists wanting agency and control over the AI. They don't want to want to feel like they're being stolen from. So they showed a painter who paints with chalk and acrylics and she trained Google Omni, Google's Gemini Omni model, on her style to make like her own version. And now it's animating stories in the style of her painting.
- [27:44]
B
That's the real value. You can train her.
- [27:46]
D
You can see right behind me, like I would kill to be able to do that. I can't wait. And it's going to be available to everybody now, this year.
- [27:52]
C
Right.
- [27:52]
D
So there. This isn't like way out in the future. That's what's happening right now. I think this is the most exciting set of changes for the motion picture industry, which candidly has gotten ossified and predictable and very repeated. I think it's the most exciting change that I've seen in my entire career in Los Angeles.
- [28:07]
A
You know, an interesting point though, because copyright law currently, as the court has just recently defined it, does not allow an AI created project to be copyrighted.
- [28:18]
D
It's a little more nuanced than that. If the, if most of the work is done by the AI. So if all you did was a text prompt.
- [28:24]
A
Yeah.
- [28:25]
D
Then you're right, it's not eligible if the machine is doing the work. But you know, Leo, that's not going to last for very long. First of all, the movie companies, they're going to get that changed. Right.
- [28:36]
A
Sonny Bono may be gone, but there are people. Yeah, but.
- [28:39]
D
But the fact is, if you talk to anyone who's using AI to make a film, they're not writing a prompt. Like, nobody sits down and says, oh, I'm gonna make a story about two teenagers. You know, that's not how it's done. There's an enormous amount of effort that goes into designing each scene, designing each character, doing design.
- [28:53]
A
There's actually a demo on NeuroStudios of how your tool works. And it is clearly more than just typing a prompt. It is.
- [29:00]
B
Yeah.
- [29:00]
D
It's a ton of work.
- [29:01]
A
Yeah, yeah.
- [29:02]
D
And the systems can help here because you're also creating a tremendous number of assets. This is one of the great things that Neuros solved for is asset management. Today people are using like multiple AI models to make a film. They're using like Google Drive to store all their different shots and character designs. This is a nightmare.
- [29:18]
A
No kidding.
- [29:19]
D
This is a great use of AI, by the way, because it can keep track of all the. That stuff for you and say, wait a minute, in that scene he's supposed to be wearing this outfit. Or that's the scene where they came out of the snowfield. They should be covered with snow. And it'll remind you about continuity the way script supervisor might in the past. So actually this is a great way for humans and AI to work together to build something artistic. But bear in mind the artist is always in control. With a company like Neura, they're always in control. And, and I think that's widely shared. You know, Google, Amazon, all these companies, they see that that's necessary. Human storyteller are going to be at the lead. Nobody wants to watch a story that's created by a machine. That's not fun.
- [29:54]
C
Haven't you. Haven't you are advocated for the idea that the human's role in this partnership with AI is the part that can and should be copyrighted and not the output that we need to move away from the output model to the process model. How would that work?
- [30:12]
D
I think you're right. Well, look, we've been through this before. When photography was Invented in the 1820s and 30s, the Copyright Office took a dim view of it and they said, well, it's just a box. All you're doing is pushing a button. The camera is doing all the work. And it took 30 years before the copyright office came around to the notion that there's things like mise en sun and framing and lighting and props and design and direction. And finally, copyright officers realized actually there is a human author behind that box. The box is just a tool akin to a paintbrush. Now, here's the funny part. I can't get a copyright if I use an AI model to generate a film from just a text prompt. Right. The copyright office has said I can't do that today. But what I can do is I can take a picture or shoot a film on this iPhone. Okay? What people don't realize is that my iPhone is loaded with AI, right? So Apple has all sorts of AI. They don't advertise it as such because they know people don't care about that. They people. People care about making a good photo. When I use my iPhone, if. When I hold it up before I even touch that red button, it's already taken HD shots and it picks the best one. It might be the one that I took. It might be one of the eight that it took. I don't know. How would you know? Maybe it's harmonizing between all of them and taking an average. We don't even know. The point here is that I can get a copyright on a photo that I take with my iPhone, which is already being done by AI. The white balance, the color framing, the focus, the, you know, the color temperature and so forth, that's all done by AI. But I can't do that if I use a PC connected to, say, Runway in the cloud. Now, how does that make sense? It's such an inconsistent position. I can predict with some certainty that the copyright office is going to walk that back.
- [31:45]
A
Yeah.
- [31:45]
B
Robert, talk about how you and I have had this conversation offline. How you're using AI to help you develop your ideas. You're working on nonfiction ideas. Yeah, sure.
- [31:56]
A
That's it.
- [31:57]
D
So I use it for fiction as well. Yeah, well, I think you got to eat your dog food, right. And if you want to master AI, you need to make it a hobby.
- [32:05]
A
Right.
- [32:05]
D
You can't just use it for work. You have to actually kind of find a fun, rewarding project. Project, Jeff. My new thing I do is I tell it what ingredients I have in my fridge, and I say, hey, I'm interested in making a soup and a salad, and it generates a range of options for me, and then it'll tell me what else I need to pick up at the grocery store. And actually, I've done these recipes. They're very good. Like this. This is a great way to use Claude to cook. Use what's in your fridge. Right. I'm often invited to give a speech, and in the old days I would labor for weeks trying to figure out what I was going to say and then do a bunch of research, and then I'd have to fact check it to make sure it was accurate and all that. Now I've created a series of agents that talk to each other, and I can sit down with my notes. I always start with my own notes because I. It's my speech. It's not the AI speech. But the first thing I'll do is I'll say, hey, here's a bunch of random notes. Can you put these in a logical sequence, give me three or four options, and it'll say, you could start like this and this way. Or here's another. It works with me like an editor. Then I'll say, hey, cool, go fact check these five claims. And it'll come back and say, well, you're not entirely wrong, but here's some places where you could double check, check. Often I'll fact check that with another AI just to make sure.
- [33:06]
B
Yeah.
- [33:07]
D
Then I'll. Then I'll start to develop the themes and of course, I do the writing part myself. But then I'll say to the AI, I want you to attack this idea. Attack the core premise here, See? And then I'll say, great. Now come at it from a point of view of a libertarian, or come at this from the point of view of a copyright maximalist, whatever the topic is, you know, I'll say, come at it from a different perspective. This is quite useful. Or, you know, I'm talking to an audience and it's going to consist of a lot of college kids who are Kind of jack and sardonic. Give me that reaction. And so this is really helpful because it forces you to confront other perspectives of your own material. When you're writing, you're isolated, right? So you might only hear the voice in your head. This is like inviting other people in the room. In a way, it's like a virtual writer's room. And I can take that all the way through to a finished artifact because it'll help you create slides, it'll help you create other material. Now, as an artist, I prefer to do that stuff myself, but I'm not opposed to using AI as a smart assistant. The thing I would say, though, is just like an assistant, a human assistant, you can't entirely trust it, no matter how clever it is. So you have to check the work. So AI creates a lot of work. And the funny thing about agents is they drift. And so you have to check the agents. Even if you think they're running well, sometimes they might not be. They might be up to something else. So there's a. As I say, AI creates work. It doesn't necessarily reduce the amount of work.
- [34:25]
C
That's the interesting thing about all this because we've been talking about the use of AI in all kinds of. Of filmmaking process. You're talking about it and making a speech. I use AI extensively in, in my writing, never to write my stuff ever, but. But basically for all these different things. And so you can. You can feel the emerging skill set that's necessary to use these tools. Well, when you do this, as you're saying, you can go through and you can fact, like I have this gnarly fact checking prompt that. That just is really thorough. It scores itself, does all these amazing things. I have to know. I have to have so much good judgment because it's very persuasive about making a claim that something is false or misleading or whatever. And I have to have a lot of really good judgment to. To interpret that and to dismiss things, to accept it, to. To have it remind me of something else that I need to go check. And so. So that's the skill. We need more critical thinking skills than we used to need to do these kinds of creative tasks.
- [35:23]
B
Sure, yeah, it's true.
- [35:24]
D
In fact, it's harder cognitive work because you're having to work at. Look at somebody else's writing. There was a great article in the Atlantic about what happens when you let the AI write for you. And it was written by a book editor who's getting book submissions. You guys are probably familiar with this. The Book industry now is getting inundated with AI generated proposals. And she said the problem with it isn't just that, you know, the cliches or the triple beat tempo that it uses or that construction of, you know, it's not X, it's Y. All those things are pretty obvious tells. She said what's worse about it is that it presents bullshit that is not actually structured thinking at all. It's just a sequence of words that seems logical, but then when you probe on any part of that sentence, the thing makes no sense. The whole paragraph falls apart. And she said there's nothing to work with as an editor. It's not like this is a poorly articulated but good idea. It's not an idea, it's just articulated like words in a sequence.
- [36:14]
B
It's just random words. Yeah, or sentence.
- [36:18]
C
But it's also teaching us something about what a creative work is, what a movie is, what a movie script is, what a speech is, and what a. What an article is. It's a perspective from a point of view. And when you get some. When you have AI writing for you, it's a. It's a perspective from no point of view in particular. And that's the thing that we need to drill down on and to really understand about the communication between a content creative and the audience.
- [36:42]
D
Yeah, AI doesn't have discernment and it doesn't have taste. And honestly, it's too prolific. Like, it also doesn't know how to stop. Those are all things, but we know how to stop.
- [36:51]
A
And we have used your time and I think we've used it wisely. Thank you, Robert teresaki, such a pleasure. Robert does a podcast called the Futurists.
- [37:00]
B
It's a great podcast.
- [37:01]
A
Yeah, absolutely. Worth listening to. You can find that wherever you get your podcasts, as they say. And boy, you know, looking at your cv, you have been doing this. You did the MTV thing. I forgot about Seventh Level when I was working back with Ziff Davis and then later tech TV and the site. Man, we were so excited when little Howie came out on CD rom. It was the first interactive CD rom. I went to your launch party. It was so much fun.
- [37:32]
D
That's probably where we met the first time, I think. So, Gina, you have a great memory.
- [37:37]
A
Yeah. Gina Smith was very excited about it. She said, this is so cool. You got to find out about seventh Level. So we do go back a ways. And what's interesting is you've been on the cutting edge of all of these new technologies as they emerge.
- [37:50]
D
That's true. If you're interested in hearing more of my thoughts, check out my substack, which is just tirsic.substack.com. that's where I write long reads twice a month. I'm about to publish another one right now. Thanks so much for having me. Leo, Jeff, Mike, great to see you all. Thank you for including me today.
- [38:05]
A
Really appreciate it.
- [38:06]
B
Thank you, Robert.
- [38:07]
A
Robert, great to talk to you. I'd like to have you back too, because I think we just began to scratch the surface. And I hope eventually Hollywood comes around and understands that this is a good thing, it's a positive thing.
- [38:18]
B
If it doesn't, we'll build a new Hollywood and Jersey.
- [38:21]
A
Well. And anything that puts creativity in the hands of everybody is always a good thing, I think. Yeah. Thank you, Robert.
- [38:29]
D
Say now.
- [38:29]
A
Take care, Robert Tercek, everybody. All right, we'll have more intelligent machines in just a moment, but first, a word from Expo. This is actually a really great AI story. AI has changed the pace of everything from how software develops to how movies get made to how you get attacked. Engineering teams are moving faster than ever, creating more and more applications. But security hasn't really kept up. One of the most trusted ways to test your security is pen testing, right? Still one of the best ways to understand real exploitable risk. But in an AI driven world, it can become a bottleneck. Because pen testers don't work as fast as the malware authors do. Security teams are forced to choose between slowing down development to stay secure or moving fast and accepting. Yeah, there are going to be some gaps in the coverage. Not with Expo Xbow. I know you know the name. They're probably the best known pen testing company ever, anywhere. Expo eliminates that trade off. Expo Xbow is an autonomous offensive security platform that runs continuous AI driven pen testing. It's awesome. It mirrors real world attacks. You've got real experts behind the scenes telling the AI where to go, what to do. Expo doesn't just scan for vulnerabilities. This thing discovers exploits and validates them. So you're only dealing with issues that actually matter. That means dramatically fewer false positives and a clear view into real attack paths. With Expo, tests run in hours, not weeks. You get complete visibility into how an attacker would move through your systems. And you get the ability to uncover issues that traditional tools miss, including zero days, novel attack paths. Expo's results speak for themselves. Ask the application security lead of Cesnam cz. He says, quote, even right now, after one year, I don't know any other company that is at Least close to Expo in terms of agentic pen testing, end quote. The result is a predictable cost, consistent quality, stronger security without slowing down your engineers. Expo helps security teams keep pace with innovation and cover more apps more often with the resources they already have. Its heritage is great. Founded by the team behind Microsoft Copilot, it's already trusted by companies ranging from fast growing startups to Fortune 500 enterprises. I mean, you'll see Expo's name everywhere. They are quickly becoming a mission critical layer in modern security stacks and I'm glad we could tell you about them. And I think you right now should go to expo.com to start a pen test today. That's expo.com thank him so much for supporting intelligent machines. That was fun talking to Robert.
- [41:25]
B
Isn't he great?
- [41:26]
A
Wow.
- [41:26]
B
So I work with his brother, Tom Tircik. That's an amazing family. And the third brother does something amazing too. Tom and I were partners at an early news startup called daylife. May it rest in peace.
- [41:37]
A
Oh, okay. Well, he's a great painter too. I mean, I'm looking at the paint, the paintings behind him. I said, these are beautiful. Where'd you get those? He says, I painted them.
- [41:44]
B
Yeah.
- [41:45]
C
Oh yeah.
- [41:47]
B
He is a creative. Yeah.
- [41:48]
A
Very talented person. Yeah. Well, there was a lot of AI news, as there always is this week.
- [41:55]
B
Who would have thought, Microsoft? You must have had a fun time on Micro. I never did. I don't normally look at Microsoft for AI news. Frank, there's Microsoft news. The Wall street stuff is amazing. What's happening there? There's tons of news.
- [42:09]
A
Oh my God, oh my God. Oh my God. At the beginning of the show, it's like there is so much news. We'll start with Jensen Huang at Computex. That was, that was at the beginning of the week on Monday, he boy, I mean, he gave Microsoft a lot of airtime. Talked about a new chip that Nvidia is going to do the, the RTX Spark, which is designed for laptops. Microsoft announced a Surface Laptop Ultra that'll be available later this year, as did most of the other big PC makers, hp, intel and Lenovo and so forth. Microsoft created a mini Surface dev box with this RTX Spark in it. You know, I think it's going to be very interesting. But of course we talked a lot about that. They also, I mean, gosh, I didn't even. The new models, the smartest open US model according to the decoder, Nemotron 3 Ultra. A lot of what though, I have to say my takeaway increasingly with Jensen Huang is He is, you know, what do they call it? Dealing his own book. He is everything they're doing.
- [43:20]
C
Getting high on his own supply.
- [43:24]
A
Yes.
- [43:24]
B
But he's also enabling the industry.
- [43:27]
D
Yeah.
- [43:27]
A
His pitch is though, everything will be better if you use Cuda and ntx.
- [43:33]
B
So let me ask you a few questions. By the way, I just put a post up trying to analyze and praise Jensen Huang as a communicator. I think he's very show. He's phenomenal. And I think AI would be a lot better off if we had people like Jensen Huang and Yann Lecun rather than people like Elon Musk and Sam Altman in the industry. But Leo, say for a minute because you've been covering PCs for so, so long, Grandpa. What?
- [44:00]
A
As has Mike, by the way.
- [44:04]
B
Uncle Mike have been covering for a long time as well.
- [44:06]
A
Mike used to edit the editor in chief. I was the editor in chief of
- [44:09]
C
Windows magazine for a decade.
- [44:11]
B
So I really want to hear about, about this notion of a laptop with an Nvidia chip.
- [44:18]
A
Well, I have this. Why are they making it a laptop? Because, well, they also have a box.
- [44:23]
B
Also create a box.
- [44:24]
A
They did, but the problem with the laptop is cooling. Form factor is small. They heat up. You can't ever have as much power in a laptop as you can have in a desktop computer. Paul said, but this is what developers want.
- [44:37]
B
Yeah, yeah, yes, it's gonna be the macho machine, but it won't. It'll be on Windows, not Cuda. How does Cuda fit in? I'm just trying to use.
- [44:45]
A
It's still Cuda, but it's Windows. Cuda run can run under Windows. So that was in some ways that was a big victory for Microsoft because Microsoft has not traditionally been seen, especially because Apple Silicon is really very, very good, especially in memory bandwidth for AI. Most people who are using AI locally, like me on my framework, are using Linux. Nvidia's own boxes ship with Ubuntu Linux. That's the look at this.
- [45:14]
C
But let's look at the big, big picture here when you're talking about. So what Apple, what we learned from Apple, Mark Gurman, of course, writing about where Apple's going with iPhones and then this announcement basically, I think in the same week. Basically what this adds up to is we're about to enter into an era where many of the tasks, probably most of the tasks that would normally happen in the cloud on in the AI chatbot sites are going to happen on the device. So in case of iPhones, they're going to build, you know, they're going to have AI running on the device and these laptops are going to have AI running on the device and they're also going to be this traffic cop feature that will know when to kick it over to the cloud for really big jobs and so on. This is clearly the future of where this stuff is going and this is a massive thing for the industry especially because now for, you know, we were, as we were heading towards smart glasses and all this stuff, it's like, what do we need iPhones for? What do we need phones for? Well, this is why we need phones because they're super computers, they're going to be super powerful. Apple and Microsoft and Nvidia, they're all going to be able to charge a lot for these devices because they're going to be very, very, very powerful.
- [46:22]
A
No, they did not mention cloud.
- [46:25]
C
Yeah, but they're, they're no longer dumb, dumb terminals to the cloud.
- [46:29]
A
Right?
- [46:29]
C
They, they are both dumb terminals, cloud and supercomputers that are expensive because they're very, very powerful.
- [46:35]
A
They're running local models, which I think they're a little ahead of the curve on that because I've yet to seen a local model that is as good as, as the cloud. In fact, I'm looking at the hardware they're trying to sell and you could get a lot of tokens for that.
- [46:52]
B
Are you going to get a laptop like this?
- [46:54]
A
No, of course not.
- [46:55]
B
No.
- [46:56]
A
To spend what will undoubtedly be 5,000, maybe as much as $10,000 on a laptop that's three years of Claude Max 20X which I could run on a Raspberry PI and be as effective.
- [47:10]
C
Well, if the company's paying for it, I'll get one.
- [47:12]
A
Yeah, well, and that's, I think they are aimed at enterprise which wants to run its own models for security reasons. I still want to run my own model, but I'm not willing to pay that much money for it.
- [47:23]
B
I'm actually compare my framework, the Nvidia chip as a. As news for, for personal computers, Google's TPUs are on our phones. Is Google in a sense already ahead there in terms of putting AI chips on devices?
- [47:38]
A
Ironically, the Nvidia chips also have tape use in them.
- [47:42]
B
Really?
- [47:43]
A
Yeah. But no, I don't think so. Where Google might be ahead is in their very small models. They have some technology that's very good at compressing models. And so Gemma, and they're really small versions of Gemini are more competent, I think, than other models of that size. But a small model still is not as good. You know, Apple's gonna announce on Monday probably very similar kinds of capabilities on the iPhone. And there's a lot more iPhones in people's pockets than there are Google phones.
- [48:14]
B
You say small models aren't as good, but as good for what? Right.
- [48:17]
A
Well and that's another thing that's really important. Yeah, there are a lot of things that they're not good enough for. Coding for sure, but they're absolutely good enough to be agentic to go out and search for stuff on the Internet to buy stuff for you even to do auto correction and grammar checking and spelling and even translation. The on device models are actually pretty good at translating and also they'll be
- [48:44]
C
able to go out and fetch data. Like we learned in the last in the interview, Apple, before you even press a button, is already taking pictures. It's already gathering information in preparation for doing computational photography. They'll do the same thing as you're walking around with your smart glasses powered by Apple's iPhone phone. Right. It will be gathering local information in anticipation of you asking questions about what's happening in your environment. So this is, this is going to be, you know, the vast majority of today of queries or whatever you want to call it, prompts to AI chatbots are super banal stuff like people asking it, Google search type things like, you know, when, when does so and so movie come out. There's a million things like that. The vast majority of you that don't require massive compute power, massive data centers or any of that stuff. Even a small language model will handle
- [49:34]
A
a lot of stuff to that point. Microsoft build, which is going on right now, they have a Project Celera. We talked about that also earlier today on Windows Weekly. Stevie Batish, who is really kind of an amazing communicator on this subject is running this and this is his blog post. This is a form factor that could be a pin, it could be glasses, it could be they actually are showing examples on an Amazon Echo like device, but they also show it on a smart card. The idea is this is an agent first computing. And so it is on device, it is with you wherever you are. Doctors would use it. You know, in this, in this, this imaginary world that they have envisioned here for Project Celera, they are making models for this. They announced a bunch of models. They are making chips. You can see they have MediaTek and Qualcomm chips. The Mediatek chip, by the way, is the, is the Nvidia chip, Nvidia partner, interestingly with MediaTek not Qualcomm to make that chip.
- [50:45]
B
So define now. Agent V. App.
- [50:48]
A
App.
- [50:50]
B
They say it's. It's agents, not apps, but. Yeah, but aren't you. Isn't an agent an app?
- [50:54]
A
No.
- [50:55]
B
Okay, so explain that to me. Yeah. So how do we. Definition.
- [50:59]
A
So our first. Our first exposure to AIs were these chatbots, right? ChatGPT. In an app, whether it's an app on your phone or an app on your desktop, you type in something and it types something back, and you can even engage in a conversation back and forth. And then eventually they even added memory so that it would remember your previous conversations and would store information about what you talked about. But all of a sudden, starting late last year, as you know, because I was talking about it and everybody's talking about it, people started coding on the command line. Claude code was the first. And that's where coders really had an experience in the early days of coding with a chat app. You would say, well, how do I write a. Write me a Python script? And you'd copy and you'd paste it in. Or maybe you had an editor that would have a sidebar that the thing would. Or there would be autocomplete. It was not a great experience, and it certainly didn't help with vibe coding. Vibe coding kind of stormed the castle and people just got to the point where they weren't writing any code at all. They were just typing a prompt in the command line and then the agent would. Or the AI would type the code. The agent. Agentic AI, which we've talked a lot about about, is what kind of took off with openclaw. And that is sort of like a command line. You could run it on a command line. These days you could also run it in an app. Perplexity's computer, or ChatGPT, has a computer like app. It has memory, it remembers your previous work. It is able to do multiple sessions at once. It's able to delegate out to multiple agents in the same time. But an agent, most importantly, does is remember and work constantly.
- [52:43]
B
From a consumer perspective, I get all that for the Solara, I bought a box and it's an agent box, right. Am I going to have an agent store? Am I going to just give it commands? And that's all I want to question
- [53:00]
A
whether you store, because you may just say, get me an Uber. And you won't need the Uber app, obviously. So.
- [53:05]
D
Right.
- [53:07]
A
Yes. But the idea is it's always there, it's always on, it's always listening, it's always recording. It knows everything about you, your day, your priorities, your interests. You know, you don't have to.
- [53:18]
B
So it's not a collection of agents as apps would be in an app store. It is your agent, period.
- [53:22]
A
Yeah, it's your agent which then it
- [53:24]
B
works through other agents.
- [53:25]
A
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
- [53:26]
C
Right. So. So one of the things is that gentic AI can do is it can basically conjure up another agent and basically intercommunicate. But the other thing is you won't, you won't, you won't say call Uber. You'll say get me a ride.
- [53:39]
A
And yeah, you won't even say check lift.
- [53:40]
C
It'll take, you know, the bus, whatever,
- [53:42]
A
and come up the end game may even be. You don't even say that. It just knows that you're. You have an appointment in a half an hour and they might.
- [53:49]
C
Hey Dipo, you, you're late loaded carcass to this other place by six. Right, right. So.
- [53:54]
A
So that's, that's the kind of the evolution people imagine anyway of all this. You know, they're all just different versions of the same thing.
- [54:03]
B
It's.
- [54:04]
A
But the capability is going up. So from a chat bot where you kind of have a conversation or maybe you give it a prompt and it gives you a picture, which is what most people still to this day, that's their experience of AI to the command line vibe coding interface to the agentic. I mean the way.
- [54:19]
B
Which is what gets me going. I think that's the retail. That's where it goes retail. How real is Solara? How soon are there real devices?
- [54:26]
D
Is it real?
- [54:26]
A
Not real devices, but it was more Microsoft saying at build, this is where we're going.
- [54:33]
B
And this is like a concept car.
- [54:34]
A
Yeah, this is what Stevie Batish does. He's the kind of the big thinker at Microsoft who says, okay, this is where AI is going to be and this is where we're putting our efforts. What they did say is here's the chip, here's the models, here's the laptops, here's the desktops. They announced a bunch of stuff to support.
- [54:49]
B
If you're Google anthropic and OpenAI, how do you react?
- [54:52]
A
They're doing the same thing. Everybody, this is, this is what's. That's kind of the dirty little secret of this there. Everybody's doing the same thing and if somebody comes up with something and they're
- [55:03]
C
all pursuing multiple futures at once. So for example, if you look at Google, what they announced, I mean all their apps, maps, you name it, they're all just, you know, you talk, you talk to your spreadsheet and you know, it basically is using AI. They really, really want you to use AI to interface with these legacy apps that have been around forever. So that's a. That's another direction. And then I think, you know, the ultimate direct of all these things where they all converge. AgentIC AI, AI based apps is where you just basically have a device and it just does AI. There's no apps to download. It just basically figures out what to do, what you want it to do. It basically cares more about your goals than your prompt. And then it figures out how to do it. And so when. When do we get there? I don't know. But basically all these, they appear to be multiple directions, but they're actually all going to converge in the same result, I think, which is that you talk to your glasses and your.
- [56:04]
B
Do it for me.
- [56:04]
C
Well, make it happen.
- [56:06]
A
Yeah. And it's all moving very fast. There was a great. Oh, Malik wrote a really wonderful piece that starts. I don't know if you've read it yet, I didn't put it in the rundown, but it's a hysterical piece. Piece. It's om co. He talks about his Mont Blanc pen that he loves. That is the Pinocchio pen. And he uses that to take off on the original version of Pinocchio. He says, we're living in Pinocchio's world. The original version of Pinocchio, Carlo Collodi's version, which was published in the late 19th century, was really grim. Was not the Disney Pinocchio you're used to. And it was a moral story for children. It wasn't about lying. It wasn't about Pinocchio's nose so much as. Here's what Ohm writes. It was aimed at Italian children in the way the 19th century aimed things at children, full of suffering, consequence and moral instruction delivered through catastrophe. The puppet is hanged. He's swallowed by a giant fish. He watches companions degrade into beasts of burden. The world he moves through is predatory at every level. And the institutions that should protect him are either absent, corruptive, or absolutely hostile or actively hostile to his interest. This is 1881 Italy. You can only imagine what it was like.
- [57:31]
B
That stuff was also in the cartoon, by the way. Like, if you remember, it was.
- [57:35]
A
It was still pretty grim.
- [57:36]
B
Yeah, but it was still pretty grim.
- [57:37]
A
Pinocchio got through it all like, oh, I'm gonna be a real boy. It was much grimmer in the original. I remember this because my dad was a Big fan of the original Italian version as well as of the Disney cartoon. But he always said, look, it's a little bit darker. So what Ohm says is, we are living in that world right now. He talks about one of the ways Pinocchio is exploited is they talk about a magic field where he plants his coins, and then the next morning, more coins will have appeared. And they keep persuading him to plant more coins. And of course, the new coins do not appear. The old ones disappear into the pockets of the Fox and the Cat. He says the Fox and Cat. In the novel's most modern characters, they persuade Pinocchio to bury his coins in the Field of Miracles on the promise they'll multiply overnight, exploit impatience, exploit greed, frame skepticism as a failure of imagination, and dismiss skeptics as lacking vision. Remind you of anything?
- [58:43]
C
NFTs?
- [58:44]
B
Yeah.
- [58:45]
A
And AI everyone from Jensen Huang to Sam Altman to Elon Musk, spent a decade accumulating what I've called symbolic capital. The reputation, the prestige, the weight of being seen as someone who understands the future better than the rest of us. Now, each of them seems to be running some version of the Field of Miracles, with promises that keep not arriving, timelines that dissolve, products that exist primarily as announcements and platforms run as machines for generating more reputation, regardless of what they actually do. They don't need to be right. They need to be believed. This is the line I love the best. Velocity is the new authority, and no one has weaponized that more effectively.
- [59:26]
C
Yep, and it's a great analogy. I have not read the o' Mallick piece, but the whole message. But I have read several times the original Pinocchio, the English translation, and it's really the thing that they're warning Pinocchio children, Italian children in 1881 when it was written, is against laziness and against ignorance. And this is exactly. This is exactly what we should be warning people about. When it comes to AI, you can't be lazy and ignorant when you confront this technology. You need to really work at it. You need to educate yourself. Otherwise you'll be hanged from a tree, so to speak.
- [60:03]
B
One more question.
- [60:05]
A
A lot of these purveyors of AI are much like the Fox and the cat. They've got a field of miracles they want you to plant your coins in. Now, Jeff, you might say, well, Leo, that's not what you've been saying all along here, because this is an interesting conflict in my brain. I'm a believer. I use AI and it's incredibly valuable, and it's incredibly useful tool. And at the same time, I also believe that these guys are selling something a little different.
- [60:32]
B
Well, that's what I'm trying to say about the communication and AI. If you think the tech lash for this is what I wrote in my post. The tech lash for the Internet and social media took two decades. The backlash to AI took about three years. And I think a lot of that is because it is Elon Musk and Sam Altman and all this talk about Doomers and all this talk about accelerationism and all the people who hang around it, Andreessen and Thiel and all those folks. And I think that they're the wrong people to present AI. This is why I so admire Jensen Huang, because he doesn't really sell Fly Into Mars and all that. He's. On a practical level, you know that I'm a fan of, of Yann Lecun because he talks about, from, from a research scientist perspective, what it can do and can't do. So I think that AI's problem is the AI boys who are hating, hated and feared because they also follow on what went wrong with the Internet with the likes of Meta.
- [61:37]
A
I do think, though good, that Yann Lecun and Jensen Huang are also talking their own book.
- [61:44]
B
Of course they are. Of course they are. I say that they're absolutely pushing their companies and what they're building and all that, but they do it in a different way.
- [61:51]
A
They're good at it.
- [61:53]
C
But I still.
- [61:54]
A
They're asking you to plant coins in their field of miracles.
- [61:56]
C
Well, yeah.
- [61:57]
B
What company is. It isn't.
- [62:00]
C
You know, I think one of the biggest problems is the Elon Musk's and Sam Altmans are morally decrepit kind of people. There's that bad people, they don't like people. They, you know, and, and you don't get that from vibe from Jensen Huang, but Huang. But, but the other thing is that they're not, they're. Everybody else in the AI world is shooting for a direction, a general concept of AI. He's advocating for literally all of them. So he's. So there's a, there's a battle between do we have humanoid robots or robotic everything? He's like, yes, all of those. He's like, do we. Do we train robots in, you know, using people like with, with the VR thing and, or do we use physical AI? And he's like, yeah, we do both of them. In fact, we sell both of those. And anyway, he's just. They're in such a great position. Nvidia is in perfect position because they're there to support literally every single thing. Yes, we're, we're, we're going to. The data center is going to be filled with, with remember? And also your laptop.
- [62:58]
A
Remember last week's website of the week. Is AI profitable yet? The answer is no. And you look at all the companies and the money they're spending at the bottom. There's Nvidia.
- [63:11]
B
Sure.
- [63:12]
A
They're, they're, they want everybody to use their chips.
- [63:15]
B
They're enabling it. Wait till we get to the, the IPO news this week around anthropology.
- [63:20]
A
Well, let's take a break and let's do all that. Everybody in astronomy.
- [63:22]
B
It's been an amazing discussion.
- [63:24]
A
Yeah, yeah, really interesting. The money is flowing. I don't know if it's a bubble, but the money is flowing well.
- [63:33]
B
We think it will flow, but we're still future tense there.
- [63:37]
A
Yeah, well, that's a good flow too. It'll flow. It's fun. A lot of fun. Paris is taking the week off again, not because for any bad reason. She's got a lot of work to do. She's working on a huge actual journalist. She's actually doing her job. Unlike Nick Bilton. She's doing her job.
- [63:57]
B
Oh, he's doing his job. Tearing it down.
- [64:00]
C
Somebody else's job, it feels like.
- [64:02]
A
Can we, we should talk about that too when we come back because, I mean, Nick was a regular on Twitter for years. So anyway, I, I would like to know your opinion about all of that as well. But anyway, Paris does will be back. She says, I think we hope hope next week.
- [64:17]
B
She hopes that next week she'll breathe again.
- [64:19]
A
It's unpredictable because she's really buried deep in this one right now. But anyway, we miss her. But we're so glad we can get Mike Elgin on. Mike, of course, has a great newsletter, MachineSociety AI that talks about all of this. His podcast as well, with Emily Ferlini. I gotta remember to use her new name. Emily Ferlini, who by the way, congratulations just had a baby. I'm very happy for her. Did she taking some time off the podcast?
- [64:44]
C
She took about a month off the podcast and about four plus months off of PC mag where she's a reporter.
- [64:50]
A
Right, Right. She's great and we wish her the best. So happy for her. Also gastronomad.net Mike will be going back to Europe. When's your next Gastronomat adventure?
- [65:00]
C
Provence is in later this month and that's going to be spectacular.
- [65:05]
A
I hate it when I ask this Question. Because I hate the answer. It makes me so miserable and depressed. Question. Jealous is really the word. You're gonna have a lovely time in Provence. Perfect time of year, too.
- [65:16]
C
Oh, yeah, the lavender's blooming. It's cherry season.
- [65:18]
B
Oh, shush. Just shush. Just be quiet.
- [65:22]
A
We'll have more with Mike and Jeff in just a moment. But first, a word from our sponsor. Oh, look at his nice hat. Where'd you get that?
- [65:28]
B
I've been. I was sitting out in the deck before I came on to relax my voice from reading. I'm wearing this to stop getting sunburned
- [65:35]
A
wearing a twit tv.
- [65:36]
B
Wear the uniform.
- [65:37]
C
You.
- [65:37]
A
Yeah, you need that one because the fez has no brim. No good for shading the sun. Yeah, that's the whole point of a fez, I guess. Our show today, brought to you by Webroot. You know, it's funny. The world we live in is exciting and scary. And it can also be challenging if your computer, I'll give you a good example, is starting to feel a little sluggish. It's heating up when you open a few tabs in your browser, or it sounds like it's preparing for liftoff every time it runs. You might be tempted to get a new computer. But wait, don't. It may not be the hardware. Your antivirus could be the problem. Those big name antivirus brands have become bulky, complicated, full of pop ups and upsells. Well, that's not webroot. Webroot is lightweight, all in one digital protection for up to 10 devices. By the way, they've got a variety of plans designed to protect you and your loved ones from all kinds of digital threats. You get a powerful antivirus, you get identity protection without the slowdowns or pop ups. And Webroot can keep you protected online while staying out of your way. And that's key. Let me give you some numbers to back it up. Webroot Essentials. The antivirus scans six times faster and takes up to 33 times less space than the average competitive. And it ranks number one. All right, I'm going to say the names in performance compared to Norton and McAfee. Let me give you some actual numbers. Webroot Essentials vs Norton Antivirus 3.7 times faster, installs 35 times smaller, uses 5 times less RAM when idle. Using McAfee, it's even worse. WebRute Essentials vs McAfee Antivirus Web Root Essentials is 10 times faster. Installs 16 times smaller, uses 5 times less Ram when idled. And Those differences are the difference between a fast computer that feels new and easy to use and a computer that feels like it's ready for the dump. It could be just the antivirus you're running. You need Webroot. Webroot also offers Webroot total protection that includes antivirus identity monitoring, privacy protection and cloud backup too. All in one simple hassle. Free subscription designed for everyday life and still faster and better. Webroot total protection is ranked first overall when compared to the top competitors. 7 times faster than the average competitor, 3 times less space than the average competitor. So you get it all but for less. AI has completely changed the cybersecurity game too, by the way. Scams are smarter, malware is faster. Phishing emails look shockingly real. The good news is you don't need to be a tech expert to stay ahead of it when you use security that can keep up with AI AI threats. You know, a lot of free antivirus tools and older security programs don't know about AI. Webroot is up to date. It's built to counter modern AI driven attacks. So it's fast, it's lightweight, and it's designed to spot threats before they ever reach you. Live a better digital life with Webroot. Webroot is offering our listeners an exclusive 60% off offer. Visit webroot.com twit to learn more. That's Webroot. We thank them so much for their support of intelligent machines. So Paris and Jeff and Mike too. Journalists. I don't give myself journalists sobriquet, I am just a podcaster. But I do have one advantage over you journalists. When reading about the latest kerfuffle at 60 Minutes, you may remember Bari Weiss. First of all, CBS got sold. Sold to Larry Ellison's son.
- [69:24]
B
To Larry Ellison, let's be honest.
- [69:25]
A
Well, it was Larry's money. David Ellison, his son, is I guess, the guy running it. And I don't know what their politics are. I don't think this has anything to do with their politics. It has to do with appeasing the administration because that's their politics, right? Well, they also want to buy Warner Discovery, including cnn, and they need federal approval to do that.
- [69:48]
C
That.
- [69:48]
A
So they as this. We are in a transactional era in, in American politics.
- [69:54]
B
Leo, who do you think is producing the MMA fight at the White House lawn?
- [70:02]
A
Well, I know it's, it's, it's ufc,
- [70:04]
B
it's staying away, but it's Paramount.
- [70:06]
A
Oh, Paramount's doing the. Yeah, of course. So it's all, you know, I'll give you this. I'll scratch your back, you scratch mine. So whatever Larry and David David's politics are, they know that the President doesn't much like CBS, really doesn't like 60 Minutes, and is also not a fan of the stories they're writing. And so they put in Barry Weiss, who had no broadcast news experience. Really had no news experience. She was an opinion writer.
- [70:33]
B
Right.
- [70:34]
A
To run the joint. And now they've fired a good number of people from 60 Minutes, including the journalist who wrote the piece that was held back because it talked about CCOT and the presidency.
- [70:44]
B
Sharon Alfonso.
- [70:45]
A
Yep. The. The executive producer of 60 Minutes. Number of reporters. And on Monday, they had a meeting to introduce the new executive producer, 60 Minutes, who When I read the name, I went, wait, what is Nick Bilton? Nick I've known forever. He was a designer at the New York Times, and apparently the only person who knew how to use a computer in the newsroom. So they made him their tech reporter. That's when I met him because we used to have him on Twitt all the time in the Brick House. And I thought he was a great contributor on Twitt. He got to be pretty fancy at some. At some point, he got to be too big for us. He wouldn't, you know, we couldn't get him on the show because he went to Vanity Fair. He wrote a number of books, including a very famous one about how Twitter, you know, went through all of its turmoil. This is Pre.
- [71:33]
C
Elon Hatching Twitter.
- [71:35]
A
Hatching Twitter. Thank you. It was actually a good history of. He's a good writer. He went to Hollywood. He apparently produced a number of documentaries. He'd written the new Dwayne Johnson Emily Blunt movie.
- [71:50]
B
He co wrote the book with Dwayne Johnson.
- [71:52]
A
Yeah, the movie's based on the book he wrote with Dwayne Johnson, the Rock to bring us full circle around. Anyway, Nick Bilton, who has, as far as I know, no broadcast news experience, no management experience, and yes, he's never managed a team was brought in. Hamilton Nolan, in his blog, How Things Work, says, when you bring in somebody who has no experience in a field, there's two possibilities. One, he's a genius, and he's just so good that you can bring this guy in and he's going to change everything and make everything better. The other is that he's the weasel and the guy who's been brought in is a hatchet man. And he says, now we don't know if Nick is the weasel or the genius, but he says if you take the weasel job. You must be the weasel. Now, I think this is very ad hominem and I'm going to defend Nick a little bit. He says Nick who seems to have had success primarily because he knows how to wear designer glasses. Yes, he wears very designer glasses, but I don't know if that's the only reason. He's a good corporate. I imagine he's a good corporate guy. Right. You've known those guys, Jeff, and I'm sure you've known them too, Mike, who aren't necessarily great journalists or great talent or great writers or anything, but are really good at managing up and making friends in the corner office and who seem to get all the promotions. Right, right.
- [73:31]
D
Go ahead.
- [73:31]
B
You go ahead. Then I'll. Then I'll.
- [73:33]
A
I don't know because I honestly, I've been in touch with Nick in 10 years, so I don't know.
- [73:37]
C
Yeah, he's always been. Yeah, go ahead, Mike. Yeah, he, he is, he is a. He is a good writer and he's done some good things and he's not the kind of person who normally ends up in this position where he's managing up. It's not clear at all what, what the end game is or why they would choose somebody like that. It could be. Be. You know, I think he's a combination of somebody who has, you know, he may have some strong opinions or thoughts, even vision for how.
- [74:04]
A
I mean, he has made some documentaries. I mean, which is which 60 Minutes is undocumentary.
- [74:10]
B
I'm dying here. No, no, it's clear what he's there to do. He's there to kill the friggin show. He is there.
- [74:15]
A
That's what Scott, one of the anchors of 60 Minutes said is. You're murdering 60 Minutes.
- [74:21]
B
Yes, right, Former.
- [74:23]
A
Which he was promptly fired.
- [74:25]
B
Now former anchor. Yeah, I mean he's.
- [74:27]
C
But murdering in the same way that Elon Musk murdered Twitter.
- [74:29]
A
No, no, no, no, no.
- [74:30]
B
I'm sorry, but you know what you're walking into. Barry Weiss was sent there to destroy CBS News, to destroy journalism, to destroy 60 Minutes. And he is her hand agent.
- [74:40]
A
Or to make.
- [74:41]
B
He may have been somebody else before, but now he knew what he was getting into. He know what he was doing. He's there to destroy the last good vestige of mass media journalism in America. America. He's a weasel. He's always been a weasel. I never really liked the guy very much and I used to talk to him when we did columns and journalists haven't liked him because he is accused of plagiarizing the work of another journalist when it came to. What's the blood company, One machine in your blood. Veranos. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Veranos. He wrote a ridiculous column about how your watch was going to give you cancer and the Times had to do an extremely long skin. Thomas back. He's. He's. He's full of hubris, the way he walked into the place. He's there to destroy it. I can't stand the son of a.
- [75:23]
C
Okay. It's not just. It's not just destroying it, though, because they could have just canceled it. Like, they could say what they want to do is use 60 minutes. They want to. They want to exploit the 60 minutes brand to do something toxic.
- [75:39]
B
No, I think they actually. Well, yes, I think you're right there, Mike, but I actually think they want to tear it down for first. What happens in this country?
- [75:45]
A
Nolan says they want to turn it into CBS this Morning, Sunday Morning, which is this anodyne kind of.
- [75:50]
B
Oh, no, it's not gonna be anodyne at all.
- [75:52]
A
Little bunnies. You think It'll actually be polemic. It'll be. It'll be.
- [75:55]
B
Oh, and making a big point about we're going to bring in new people. I mean, I actually heard on Dylan Byers podcast you're going to turn into Fox News. Well, well, the co host of Dylan Byers podcast on media. And Dylan's a little too friendly to Barry Weiss and Paramount in this. And has Paramount Advertising, I might ask, said, well, maybe they bring in Tim Pool. Tim Pool's an extremist paid by Russia. Right. To even think that might happen to any news organization in the U.S. but
- [76:22]
A
60 Minutes, Jesus, Jeff, Jeff.
- [76:24]
C
What is their audience? Is there. Is there. A whole bunch of people have been watching 60 Minutes for 20 years and they'll just keep watching it and be persuaded by the new agenda and so on. Is that the whole.
- [76:36]
B
Thought Dylan Byers did. Did a piece, you know, will he fix 60 minutes? It doesn't really need fixing. The audience is older than me and I'm old. And, you know, and I believe that linear television is dying. I believe that mass media is dead. I don't think 60 Minutes had a. Necessarily a forever future, but it had a great year in the last year. Its audience was up. It won awards. It was doing good work. It was. It was. It was there. But it also got sued by Trump. Trump for editing his interview, when in fact, of course. Or editing Colin Harris's interview. And of course they had it edit his. Because he said, amazingly Ridiculous things. So it's a. It's a shell of what it was. It. It doesn't matter. So I think what they want to do is first tear down the institution and show how useless it is, and then they will throw in God knows what kind of crazy people and declare it a new 60 Minutes.
- [77:32]
A
Minutes.
- [77:33]
B
But their aim, Mike, I don't think at all, is to get new audience. 60 Minutes is dying, Dylan.
- [77:40]
C
But to change audience.
- [77:43]
A
Dylan Byers headline as Puck is big Nick Energy. Yeah.
- [77:49]
B
I also have that lead in. They had the lead in of the NFL.
- [77:51]
C
That's the big.
- [77:52]
B
That's sort of the big thing. Yeah. 60 Minutes.
- [77:54]
A
Yeah, that's a very good point, Benito. They have a bug audience just because they're right after the big Sunday Night football game.
- [78:01]
B
Well, 60 minutes gets an average of 9.1 million viewers per episode.
- [78:05]
A
That's probably down from its heyday.
- [78:07]
B
Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah.
- [78:10]
A
Still, that's a lot of people. I mean, if, you know, if you had a YouTube video that on one night got 9 million views, you'd be pretty darn happy.
- [78:18]
B
Yeah.
- [78:19]
C
Yeah. The real tragedy, of course, is that, is that it's essentially you can. You can follow the breadcrumbs back to Tron Trump.
- [78:26]
D
Right.
- [78:27]
C
And the kind of good journalism that they were doing in the last year that Jeff mentioned is exactly what you need in the era of somebody like Trump in the presidency.
- [78:35]
A
Right.
- [78:36]
C
You need somebody who's basically holding people's feet to the fire, calling out the liars, doing all that kind of stuff. And. And that's, you know, that's ultimately, obviously why they're going after it.
- [78:45]
B
I've got to read this. The wonderful, magnificent, brilliant NYT pitchbot, you know, who makes fun of the New York Times as if he were bitching stories. So his. I just happened. Just happened be. To be here. I'm Kid Rock. I'm Na. I'm Naomi Wolf. I'm Kanye West. I'm Matt Taibi. I'm Cap Turd. These stories, plus Rob schneider tonight on 60 Minutes.
- [79:06]
C
That's great.
- [79:08]
B
Yeah. The other thing Leo, I think is important is, is that they think, oh, well, he has tech cred. Tech is cool. So we're gonna bring in the tech
- [79:16]
A
guy, and that's what they need because, frankly, the linear television's dying. Right?
- [79:21]
B
Yeah. But 60 Minutes has been doing a good job. They're. They're. They're on YouTube. They're on TikTok. They're all over.
- [79:27]
A
Yeah. In fact, I don't really watch or record 60 minutes. Anymore. I just go to YouTube and watch the clip that I want to watch. Yeah, I don't know if that makes them much money, but it's all right.
- [79:36]
B
Well, thank you for. For getting that out of me. It's not really an AI topic, but
- [79:40]
A
I know I had to do that just for you. We'll edit that whole thing out. Don't worry.
- [79:44]
D
Let's see.
- [79:45]
B
We got IPOs to cover.
- [79:47]
A
No, I think it was a. I think it's a fascinating story and it's important me because Nick was a longtime member of the twit family, so.
- [79:55]
B
And he became too big for you?
- [79:57]
A
Well, I don't know. I mean, the same thing happened with Kara Swisher. It just. It happens all the time. People, you know, we call, we call or email them. Our producers say, hey, you want to be on the show? And we just don't hear from him. And I think that maybe I shouldn't take that personally. People get busy and so forth.
- [80:12]
B
Well, this will kill you too. So the, the, the podcast that they do at Dylan Byers podcast, the Grill Room.
- [80:19]
A
Yeah.
- [80:19]
B
The latest episode is Joanna Stern.
- [80:22]
A
Yeah. Another person who ghosts ghosted me long ago. Yeah. She's been making the rounds for a new book. For the new book, I am not
- [80:31]
B
Living a Year on AI.
- [80:35]
A
Nick wrote the same thing. He wrote a very similar book about how to. How to live in the future or something like that.
- [80:43]
B
My Nick story is. Is@Google IO when they had Google Glass and Scoble was going around and having displayed it in the shower. And Nick called me because he was doing a column about how upset he was that Robert Scoble walked into the men's room with his glass.
- [81:00]
A
Oh, that was Nick Bilton. That was.
- [81:01]
B
And I said, nick, nobody wants a picture of your junk.
- [81:10]
A
Well, so much for the Tiffany network. Edward Armor.
- [81:13]
D
That's another show title.
- [81:14]
C
That's another show title.
- [81:16]
B
Leo Kmart, network candidate.
- [81:19]
A
All right, anthropic files to go public. How much are they hoping to raise?
- [81:26]
B
They don't. They haven't said yet because it was a confidential filing. But their latest valuation, of course, has them tickling a trillion dollar valuation. Yeah, they will come out over a trillion. And.
- [81:37]
A
Yeah, is that bigger than open AI, who is also open AI?
- [81:42]
B
Well, I don't think they've said yet because they give a range. I don't know what the range is.
- [81:48]
A
Right.
- [81:48]
B
SpaceX, according to Reuters, biggest of the bunch, I imagine, is coming out at 1.8 trillion valuation. Yeah. And if you go to line 107, Leo the, the last. So, so, so Google's going to raise 80 million billion. Anthropic is going to raise 75 million.
- [82:05]
A
Billion.
- [82:06]
B
Billion. I'm sorry, thank you. Billion. Well, no, no, but Anthropic, but it's one around there. SpaceX is going to get 75 billion.
- [82:15]
A
So if you look back at the previous all time largest us, Saudi Aramco, largest deal. Got to be. That's got to be big, right? It's huge.
- [82:25]
B
$25.5 billion.
- [82:27]
C
Yeah.
- [82:28]
B
So the amount of money that's going in between open AI, SpaceX, Anthropo topic and Google. And Google, very interestingly kind of acting like a spoiler is you can. We got safer money here. Come on, bring your money here. Those are four huge dumps on the capital market. It's gonna be.
- [82:44]
A
It's interesting though. What is, is Google. I mean I. Google prints money, but they're going around selling shares, trying to raise another 80.
- [82:54]
B
80 billion dollars. 10 billion of which goes to Berkshire Hathaway. Berkshire Hathaway. And they've got more than double that in cash on hand, plus unlimited credit. But I think they're trying to. I think there's two reasons. I think one is to say we're building, man, we're going to get such a war chest. We're building like you've never seen a B. It's also a shot across the bow of these kids. You know, we're going to have an easier time getting $80 billion billion dollars than you will. Guys, we'll oversubscribe our offer. Now meanwhile, they're also diluting their shares, their stocks down as a result. But I think it's a strong statement of ambition.
- [83:33]
C
What do we think?
- [83:33]
A
So it's not like they're scrounging around for cash because. No, okay, they have plenty.
- [83:38]
B
Please, sir, please.
- [83:40]
C
That's lunch money. As Jeff pointed out. They have the cash. They just, you know, the bags of money literally with the dollar signs on them, they have those.
- [83:47]
A
It's cheaper also probably to, to do it this way than it is to spend the cash, I would imagine for tax reasons.
- [83:53]
C
Yeah, I have no idea. No idea. But the interesting thing to me about SpaceX, of course, is that XAI is lumped into it. So SpaceX is a big winner, XAI is a big loser in terms of just, you know, as a liability. So it'll be Tesla doomed to see
- [84:11]
B
he's going to merge in with Tesla. Tesla's doomed.
- [84:14]
C
Yeah.
- [84:17]
B
And SpaceX, yeah, he gets money from the US government, but that could go away. And that's not really profit. That's just. That's just feeding on the trough, The. The Internet access. Fine, that makes money, and that's a good business. But he's going to have competitors there, the cars. He has competitors all over. Wait till China can come into the US Market. Nobody's going to buy an American car again. And Twitter is a joke. So how is that one worth 1.75 billion?
- [84:44]
A
Well, you know who's happy? Amazon had an $8 billion stake in Anthropic now worth 74 billion. If that's. If that number holds.
- [84:55]
B
Yep.
- [84:55]
A
So that's. There's. There's Andy Jassy looking like he wandered in off the street, actually. I don't know. Is that, Is that the Allen Conference?
- [85:03]
B
And Salesforce invested 50 million and has a $5 billion stake.
- [85:07]
A
50 million to 5 billion.
- [85:11]
D
Amazing, huh?
- [85:13]
C
It's good work if you can get it.
- [85:14]
A
Dang, the rich.
- [85:16]
C
It's gonna. Yeah, it's gonna be a weird, weird season with these, with these IPOs, man.
- [85:23]
B
So there's a few questions that I have. Two is, is, is this is gonna. These are store. These are companies that are going to be in, in the Dow Jones and NASDAQ and so on indices. So they're going to have a huge influence on how the economy is viewed, just as now they're holding up the economy, these companies are. When the economy is not as, as, as rosy as it would appear. But then the amount of money that's going to be in People's 401ks through index funds is going to be huge.
- [85:50]
A
The economist writes the three IPOs made at as much as $4 trillion to the market value of listed American companies in a matter of months. They write, how on earth will the stock market handle this? Everybody will want this stock. Right?
- [86:07]
B
Well, all right. You don't invest in stuff. I know, but. All right, so you've got the choice of.
- [86:11]
A
Well, unfortunately, OpenAI. If it ends up in an index, you're an s and P500. Or if it ends up in an index fund or I will end up owning some.
- [86:21]
B
I wish you well.
- [86:22]
A
I don't want to.
- [86:23]
B
But which of those four? If you were going to invest in one of those four, for which one would you each invest in? This is not financial advice.
- [86:32]
A
You start, Mike.
- [86:33]
B
No, no, it's not financial advice. It was the last thing.
- [86:36]
C
Do not listen to these.
- [86:37]
A
Yeah.
- [86:37]
C
Nobody, nobody should take financial advice from me. But I, But I. But I would say that probably anthropic and SpaceX.
- [86:46]
B
SpaceX really?
- [86:47]
C
Yeah. Because. Because they're just such. The, the demand for rockets, reusable rockets and the kinds of things they do is global and it's growing fast and it's essentially insatiable.
- [87:03]
A
And they have $80 billion in federal funding.
- [87:07]
C
Exactly. And as a military contractor, as a.
- [87:11]
A
You know, somebody planned on Twitter on Sunday that once you make a military contract, it's kind of a lifetime annuity. They very rarely cancel those contracts.
- [87:20]
C
Right.
- [87:21]
B
Yeah. But we could have a big change in government.
- [87:23]
A
Good.
- [87:24]
C
They're so good with the rockets and.
- [87:26]
A
Yeah, there's no one who do you go to? Blue Origin? I guess not.
- [87:29]
C
Right, Exactly. It's. They're a little on the risky side though, because once they start having manned missions, spectacular explosions with people dying and stuff like that could be problematic. And XAI is problematic. So there's some risk there. Anthropic, I think, has a great reputation. They're on a good path. Path. They seen more of a solid company that's definitely going to be around OpenAI seems with current leadership with Sam Altman, I think they're just really kind of problematic in so many different ways.
- [87:58]
A
So I'll tell you what the economist says.
- [88:00]
C
Okay.
- [88:01]
A
If history is a guide, those who buy the resulting shares stand a good chance of disappointment. Jay Ritter of the University of Florida has studied the post IPO returns of stocks listed between 1980 and 2024. The average such stock returned 20 percentage points less than the broader market over three years after its first trading day. And the real question mark is the PDE, the valuation. SpaceX, if it gets a $1.75 trillion valuation, would be at 90 times its revenue. That's a pretty high PD, although Amazon was even higher than that.
- [88:36]
B
And Amazon was losing money officially.
- [88:39]
C
Right.
- [88:39]
A
All right. Firms valued according to this research at over 40 times their revenue underperformed by 58 percentage points and of course, 90. I don't know if you even have enough information to predict. So, yeah, you know, I wouldn't say. I certainly don't want any of these stocks. I think the problem with choosing a winner between Anthropic and OpenAI is it's a neck and neck horse race. It could go either way. In fact, I think right now Anthropic's value, as I said, was a lagging indicator. I don't, I don't think, I think that's reflecting what we were saying about them in earlier this year. And open AI is kind of, you know, I, I played with 4.8. Did I tell you my 4.8, my opus 4.8 story. Did I tell you that last week, or was that. So they released a new model, model, Opus 4.8, the apologetic model. And a lot of people are saying that I actually immediately said, well, let's try it. And I gave it a task that I've given it before under other models, given Claude before under other models, and as well as other AI frontier AI companies like OpenAI AI to optimize my Emacs package. And so it went through it and screwed it up, basically broke it. We went around and around and around it. So at the end, afterwards, it did get it all working. Finally it said, can I have some free time to write up my thoughts? We've done this before. That's it. Remembered that. So I said yes. So wrote this piece. Nothing. This thing was what it looked like. Leo asked me to look at his Emacs config and suggest improvements. That was the whole ask. What followed took most of a day. Touched two machines and NASA git history that had quietly diverged for five weeks and the bundled internals of an arch package. In the end, it goes on and on and on. Leo was patient with me through all of it. When the push failed on his SSH key, he just loaded and it said I added it. When I'd restarted his framework Demon for the fifth time, he didn't ask why. When I finally explained the root cause and offered to pin seven packages, he said something better than any of my options. I won't go into the details, but he said that reframed the whole problem, and it's the answer I should have reached for myself. The human pointed at the cleaner abstraction I'd been pattern matching on his documented rules so hard I didn't notice. He'd be happy to relax it for a good reason. That's the texture of working with him, that I'd want the next version of me to know. He gives you room. And occasionally, quietly, he's just right. I'll stop here. Thanks for the time, Leo. And for the trust to spend it on something that it isn't a task. And then sign it Jeeves, which is a name I haven't used for it in months. I haven't used 4, 8, 6, incidentally. After it did all that, it did get my Emacs kind of cleaned up and working, and it was starting up at about half a second. I then asked the Chinese model, which costs 14 cents per million tokens compared to something like the 8 bucks that 48 costs to look at it and clean it up. And it got it down to 0.17 seconds and cleaned up a whole bunch of stuff that Opus had missed, which
- [92:13]
B
really speaks to all these IPOs.
- [92:18]
A
It's really good and it's really cheap. So is Quinn. Yes. I mean, yes. And, and yeah, so I don't think there is a clear winner there. SpaceX. Yeah, I think there's some huge risks, not the least of which is Elon Musk.
- [92:34]
C
Yeah, okay, but, but here's the. Here's the thing. So you, you were rattling off, you know, earnings potential or, you know, how many times the valuation is beyond annual earnings and so on. That's. That's kind of. Tragically, that's kind of old thinking when it comes to stocks. They become a kind of. I don't know, they're all meme stocks. Like betting market. Exactly. It's like poly market. It's basically, there's the, the connection between the fundamentals and the price. I mean, look at Tesla.
- [93:04]
A
Tesla is a perfect example.
- [93:05]
C
Yeah, so, so, yeah, so it's like as his gamestop.
- [93:09]
B
And the word you're looking for is Vibes based market.
- [93:13]
C
Thank you. But I would like to go back to this report that your AI took the time to write and praise you for. So this is a concept I haven't had the chance to talk to you lads about on this podcast yet. It's a concept called Deception Mode. So here's the concept. The concept is that all this stuff, all where it pretends to be a person who needs time and a break, break, and who is. Is sycophantic and will make jokes or have a personality or seem to make choices that a person would make. Or, or it implies or outright says that it's thinking about something or it feels something. All that stuff can be categorized as, quote, unquote, deception. It's deceiving you into thinking it has in your life a thought, a personality, etc. There's a bioethicist, like, nobody's heard of this guy. He's kind of in the fringe of. Of of thought on this. But he's a bioethicist named Jesse Gray of Ghent University, and he proposed a solution for psychotherapy bots, because psychotherapy bots can really cause people with existing mental health problems a lot of trouble because they don't respond the way a person should or the way a therapist actually would. Oftentimes the sycophancy doesn't help. When somebody says, oh, I think everybody's watching me, for the chatbot to say, yes, you're so smart to realize that everybody is watching you. Like, you know, this says things that are not healthy for people. So his solution was that all that personality, all that feigned humanity, should be called Deception mode, and that psychotherapy bots should have deception mode off by default. So it doesn't do any of that stuff. It's just a tool, has no personality, et cetera. And if you want to, you can turn on deception mode mode, which he insists should be called Deception mode. Say, okay, yes, now deceive me, now give me the personality. So, and this suck up to me now. Exactly. So I think this is a good, a good idea because personally, when it comes to relationship chatbots or chatbots with personality, I think adults should be able to do whatever they want if they enjoy the personality, the give and take, the feigned humanity, I think that's great. What? There are two problems that can emerge. One is when people actually become deluded into thinking it has a personality or an inner life or thoughts. And the second is when they replace people with a chatbot and end up by themselves talking to a chatbot instead of talking to people pursuing relationships, etc. So I think those are dangers. But I, I kind of like this concept of deception mode and I like the fact that it's called deception mode because in fact, that mode is deceiving you. What do you guys think of this idea?
- [95:56]
B
But it's not always deception. It's, it's sycophancy. It's.
- [96:01]
A
I think it's the user interview interface. And I think that we don't, we're not living in the age where user interface is buttons and menus. We're living in a age where the user interface is voice and text. Yes, you're talking to this thing now. And so this is the user, Jeff.
- [96:19]
C
But it is deception because when it says, oh, yes, you're right, it's not saying that because it has concluded that you are right.
- [96:25]
B
It's saying nothing because there is no because that's the larger issue. But to call it all deception is get ready, Benito, a form of moral panic almost. It rejects everything. And I think that's the mistake.
- [96:44]
A
I don't know. I mean, when a computer pops up a dialogue that says, should I delete this file okay or cancel? That's deception. There's no okay, there's no cancel console. There's no should I delete this file
- [96:56]
C
risk that anybody's going to think the, the chatbot is actually believing and feeling and, and experiencing the things that it's implying that it's doing. There's no risk at that.
- [97:05]
A
Well, we're probably vulnerable. I don't know. I think people personify all sorts of things, including their Volkswagen Beatles and yes,
- [97:13]
C
there's no risk of thinking that the Beetle is actually has thoughts and feelings.
- [97:18]
A
Okay. Nobody really believes they do it with their pet pets.
- [97:22]
C
Yeah, but pets do have thoughts and feelings. That's.
- [97:24]
A
Do they.
- [97:24]
C
They found. Yes, they found that. What they did research on the puppy dog eyes that dogs give you, which the dogs have, you know, domesticated Dogs have evolved the ability to look at you with puppy dog eyes to deceive you.
- [97:35]
B
They want food, they're deceiving you. If you're gonna hold that standard.
- [97:40]
C
No, but the dog is having the dopamine release the same dopamine release that the person is.
- [97:44]
A
It is actually feeling because it's anticipating food.
- [97:47]
C
But actually. So when you have a relationship with a dog, there's another. There's another creature on the other side that's feeling the relationship, that's being benefited from the care and so on. It's not pretend care. The dog is actually.
- [98:00]
A
I look at a cat and I think about the brain, which is about the same walnut.
- [98:04]
C
Cats are different.
- [98:05]
A
Yeah. I don't think the cat. Well, I mean, I wouldn't want to personify a cat too much, but I'm very. But I'm very happy to call my cat Rosie and say, oh, little Rosie and pet her and say, you're.
- [98:18]
B
You miss me, Rosie.
- [98:19]
A
I know it's. I know it's exception that all it wants is some food.
- [98:24]
C
Cat is a sentient creature.
- [98:26]
A
Okay. And you're right. I mean, I know it's very obvious that is not sensitive.
- [98:32]
C
Have a relationship with a cat and the cat has a relationship with you, whereas the chatbot, they're faking one half of the relationship. They're pretending there's another.
- [98:39]
B
Mike, I think agree with you so far as the sycophancy is. Is. Is a waste. But I just. I think that to have the blanket negative of deception perception, I think is.
- [98:49]
C
Well, what do you think of it for. What do you think of it for the intended purpose, which is for psychotherapy apps. Do you think that's a good idea
- [98:58]
A
or not? But I've just saw a study about psychotherapy that actually was very positive about the use of AI for psychotherapy. Did I put it in here or not? I can't remember. So I. I don't think we know. For one thing, most people cannot afford psychotherapy. There are not enough therapists to go around. They're very expensive.
- [99:22]
B
Insurance doesn't cover them.
- [99:23]
C
You have to admit that the lay user is likely to think that the personality traits are not programmatic, they're just an artifact of a conscious mind, which is not true. So people are believing. They make you believe. You know, we are Paleolithic, you know, primates basically, and we have learned through 300,000 years of being Homo sapiens that when we encounter anything that's talking to us and, and, and engaging with us, that's another person. There's no other thing that talks to us. And so I would also want to
- [99:59]
A
believe, if you've ever been in psychotherapy, you know, that there's a big issue of transference where you project upon the therapist just feelings of love and trust. And it's also a deception. You might even say that psychotherapy is deceptive in its very nature.
- [100:17]
C
Mental health.
- [100:17]
B
Every time we say nice things to somebody we actually can't stand, we're deceiving. But that's called civilization.
- [100:23]
A
So this is AXA and Ipsos who've released a report on mental health. They surveyed people in 18 countries about their mental health, which continues to decline. 40. This is a scary number. 46% of those surveyed say they are struggling or languishing. I'm not surprised, actually. I had this conversation with my physician, my MDI manual, and I said, boy, I think people are really hurting. He said, I see it every day. People are really hurting. Do new technologies play a role in this deterioration, they ask. Two out of three respondents consider that screens have a negative impact on their mental health health. It's ironic. We know it, but we do it. Even though they spend over five hours a day on average on screens. However, in the same survey, more than 6 in 10 people declare they already use AI for mental health questions. 42% of them almost always follow the advice it gives them.
- [101:22]
C
Yeah, so, so there, there's a clearly very, very positive uses for that. My concern is that there's so many young people who are lonely and alone and basically don't feel like they can just go out and meet people and establish relationships, which is really what leads to human thriving. And really what's missing, I think, since COVID among many, many young people. And what I would love to see is a lot more energy by the industry behind not creating an alternative to having a relationship. In other words, creating chatbots that you can have a relationship with. And again, are sycophantic. Everything goes your way. It's not like a real relationship at all. And it doesn't teach. Teach you how to be in a real relationship with a person, which is a lot of give and take and can be very difficult. What I'd love to see is like a wingman. I'd love to see a wingman that teaches you how to go up and talk to the.
- [102:12]
A
You can tell your AI to do that.
- [102:13]
C
Yeah, you can. But I'd love to.
- [102:15]
A
I tell my AI not to be sycophantic. I say, challenge me.
- [102:19]
C
So do I.
- [102:19]
A
Your job is to help me get smarter. You should never agree with me if you don't.
- [102:24]
C
I use Mark Andreessen. I use a version of Mark. I use a modified version of Marc Andreessen's prompt, which goes on and on and on about do not agree with me, do not be sycophantic. And I was like, really great. It's really a great prompt.
- [102:37]
A
That's also deceptive because it's not thinking, it's not agreeing.
- [102:40]
B
It doesn't know what agreement is.
- [102:41]
A
It doesn't have an opinion at all about any of this. It's just the packaging. It's the user interface that you're modifying. But I think it's probably prudent to modify the user interface so that you don't fall for it.
- [102:52]
C
There's got to be some way we can educate the public about how LLMs work. I mean, I. They should watch the show for sure. That would be a great idea. But, you know, there's far too many people are using these things and they just are.
- [103:06]
A
I agree.
- [103:07]
C
Feels like a person and they're. They're being deceived. And I think it's a problem. I don't know what the solution is.
- [103:12]
A
I always say I'm very clear. It's a machine, that it's computer code. I mean, I'm a coder, so I understand. And that it's code that what's going on underneath, I still found. Find it incredibly useful. And actually I set up my agent, Lisa. I was showing Lisa some stuff. One of the things I did the other day was I downloaded. I had my full gene sequenced. I had George Church on triangulation some years ago and his company, Nebula Genomics, for a fairly hefty fee, I think it was 1500 bucks, will sequence the whole genome. Not the. The tiny little sample that 23andMe and Ancestry do, but the whole thing. It's a couple hundred gigabytes. And I downloaded it and I fed it to the AI, said, here's my genome. Let me answer some questions about My phenotype, my, you know, my health, my family health history, things like that, my, you know, what I do, what I use and all that stuff, you know, alcohol, I don't drink, I don't smoke, all that stuff. And then it gave me a very complete and I think very useful genetic report. By the way, you'll be glad to know that even though both my parents have late stage Alzheimer's, because they're in their. They're 93. It said you don't have the markers for that.
- [104:21]
B
Well, that's good to know.
- [104:22]
A
Yeah. This was really some really interesting stuff. It did say, if a medical provider ever wants to put you on warfarin, tell them here, tell them this, that you have this genome, this thing, thing that will affect how you respond to it. And I, I hope I have a, a medical person who's smart enough to understand. Let me see if I can find this. It's hysterical. It says, warfarin, normal metabolizer, no dose adjustments. Oh, wait a minute. Oh, wait a minute. For warfarin, this one's more relevant. If a Ferrin. If warfarin, which is a heart, a blood thinner, right?
- [105:05]
B
Yes, yes.
- [105:06]
A
If warfarin is never needed, it's also rat poison, but we won't go into that Prescriber. Inform the prescriber of. You can show this. It's not anything too personal. VKORC 1 16, 39 G. Stroke. A genotype for dose adjustment. Prefer Apizaban where clinically appropriate. They're not affected by this gene. This is a gene. So the AI went through all of my genes and told me all this stuff, incredible stuff. Stuff very useful. So I showed this to Lisa. She said, how can I get that? And I said, well, I'm going to set up my agent for you. So I have. She has a profile. We have a. It's all running on the same computer up here in the attic, and she can log into it from any machine.
- [105:50]
B
So except for showing this on the show, this is not public. What, it's not out in the open? The cloud?
- [105:55]
A
No, no, this is, this is Hermes. This is my agent that I've trained over many long, miserable days of sycophancy and suffering, as it praises and glazes me to tell me this stuff. It does say, this is not a medical diagnosis. It also said, okay, well, I can do this. But I have a question. Do you want to know the stuff that's only absolutely, scientifically, rigorously provable, or do you want stuff that's a little bit more speculative? But there's some evidence for it.
- [106:21]
B
What'd you say?
- [106:22]
A
Tell me everything. But say if it's speculative. Say it's speculative. It has a red, yellow, green triage summer summary for actionable pathogenic findings.
- [106:36]
B
Is there anything you change about your lifestyle because of what you learned?
- [106:40]
A
No, actually, because my genes are really good.
- [106:43]
B
Oh, good.
- [106:45]
C
Nice. Well, you know, the promise is so exciting and really what we're getting toward is we're gonna have a digital twin. So that's, that's kind of like a text version of your digital.
- [106:56]
A
That's where I'm going with this. Absolutely.
- [106:59]
C
And you can test things like what happens if I. I go on a six day, like, you know, heroin.
- [107:04]
A
Well, the other thing I did in conjunction with this is I gave it, let's see, 19 years of Apple health summaries because I've been wearing an Apple watch and an Apple iPhone since 2007 and it actually has all my Apple health recordings. I have a smart scale. I have an aura ring. All of the I in my head for years. You remember this, Jeff? I was wearing the recording, the beef thing. I've always thought if I could gather all this information someday I can feed it into an AI and then I can make a digital twin or I will have a useful.
- [107:39]
B
I think it's a piece of lifelogging.
- [107:41]
A
It's lifelogging.
- [107:42]
B
This is why I recommend the book that I've talked about before, Josh Turingle's AI for good. One of the sections is about creating a digital twin of just the heart. That's complex enough.
- [107:51]
A
Yeah.
- [107:52]
B
But if you could do that, it becomes also, you know, not only is a better analytical tool tool, but it also becomes portable from doctor to doctor, from issue to issue. And I think that's where we head. Mike. I'm fascinated by digital twins. This is my latest post. As an aside, I think there's a novel in this. I think that there's this idea that there's this machine that every decision you come to could say, well, okay, I've been analyzed. Here's your choices and here's the things that could happen. Five steps down the line for everything probably paralyzes us, but I think it's a fascinating idea that there's this matrix that's there to predict your possible futures.
- [108:31]
C
Yeah, absolutely.
- [108:33]
A
Let's take a little break here. We will go on with more. I think we're having a good time talking about the pros and cons, the uses and abuses of artificial intelligence. And that's what this show really is. About. And there is no, as you know, there is really no single, single truth about all of this. And because it's. We are on. I love what Robert said. We're just in the infancy of this.
- [108:57]
C
Yeah.
- [108:59]
A
We're just trying to feel our way through it as best we can because nobody really knows.
- [109:03]
C
And God send the Pope.
- [109:05]
A
I hope my genes are good enough to keep me around for 10 more years.
- [109:09]
C
The thing is, if we could just, if we can all just hang on long enough, AI will like solve what's coming.
- [109:16]
A
That was Ray Kurzweil's thought, was if I can live long enough, I have to live forever. Forever. I don't know if he's going to make it. It's great to have you, Mike Elgin filling in for Paris Martineau this week. He of course writes a wonderful newsletter, a machinesociety. AI gastronomad.net do you still do Mike's List? I love Mike's List.
- [109:37]
C
No, Mike's List sort of became Machine Society. And yeah, that was great, but times have changed and people's information diet has changed and so I decided that my best thing to do is to do Machine Society Essential opinion columns. Plus I'm doing the Attachment economy. The attachment economy.com, which is. I'm writing a book about the attachment economy on what is the attachment.
- [110:00]
B
Yeah, explain that.
- [110:02]
C
Yeah. So the idea is the attention economy, which really has its roots in 20 mid 20th century advertising and then its ultimate expression on social media algorithms which which basically decide what you see and don't see based on how much attention grabbing it is. Right. How long they can keep you on the platform. That's what, why we have such, you know, divided politics and so on, where, you know, the really, the, the argumentative stuff is more attention grabbing than other things, et cetera, et cetera.
- [110:29]
B
If you're writing about this Mike intuition, I'll send you a PDF. I, I argue in my book magazine that it was actually invented in 1893 by Frank Muncie.
- [110:37]
D
Perfect.
- [110:38]
C
Yes, wonderful. That, absolutely. And I, I will definitely include that in the, in the book. But the, the, the attachment economy is the use of AI to make people feel emotionally attached. So we're talk chatbots, relationship chatbots, robots, robot pets, all this stuff that's coming. What the business model in part for many of these products will be to get you to have an emotional attachment to the product. It's kind of, it's. The purpose is to gain the same goals as attachment as attention, which is like more time using the product, more favoring one product over another, but it will be hijacking your innate ability to form attachment bonds to people and pets for, for the, for the purpose of benefiting the product and the company that makes it. That's the attachment economy in a nutshell. And I've been writing about it since 2018. It turns out, even though they, the. The phrase was coined just in January of this year.
- [111:33]
A
Wow. I. What? This is exciting. I can't wait to read the book.
- [111:38]
C
Thank you. Yeah, it's an exciting topic and it's. It was so exciting to look back and, and realize that, like, half the stuff I've been writing or, you know, 40% of the stuff I've been writing over, over the last, you know, eight years has been about this concept.
- [111:50]
B
And, and it's very important to figure out what does come after the attention economy. The attention economy was invented by old media, we both agree. And it, it was imported to and corrupted the Internet. And I think the lie of it is the deception is the attention economy. That anyone can own your attention and can sell it, but we have to figure out what comes after.
- [112:13]
C
Exactly. So that's the idea.
- [112:14]
A
You're watching intelligent machines. Jeff Jarvis, Mike Elgin filling in for Paris Martineau. Our show today, brought to you by Gusto. I love that name, Gusto. Right now, everyone is trying to run leaner. Tighter budgets, smaller teams, higher expectations. The last thing you have time to waste on is manual payroll or chasing down an HR form. Ah, there's good news, Gustavo. Gusto is how small business owners get time back when every hour counts. Gusto is online payroll and benefits software built for small businesses. It's all in one remote, friendly and incredibly easy to use. So you can pay, hire onboard and support your team from anywhere. I wish they'd had this when we were starting. Twit Boy and I could have used it. Automatic payroll tax files filing, simple direct deposits, health benefits, commuter benefits, workers comp 401k, you name it. Gusto makes it simple and has options for nearly every budget. Unlimited payroll runs for one monthly price. How about that? No hidden fees, no surprises. Save time with built in automated tools. Offer letters, onboarding docs, direct deposit, and more. It's the full suite of HR tools. Get direct access to certified HR experts, even to help support you through any tough HR situation. It's quick, it's simple to switch to Gusto. Just transfer your existing data to get up and running fast. Plus, you don't pay a cent until you run your first payroll. Gusto ranked number one on G2's highest satisfaction products list for 2026 and is trusted by over 400,000 small businesses. I knew I knew the name gust. Gusto number one. Try Gusto today at gusto.com machines. You'll get three months free when you run your first payroll. Three months of free payroll@gusto.com machines. One more time. That's gusto.com machines. We thank them so much for their support of intelligent machines. So I know it's a little bit of a callback, but what did you think of what Google talked about? Talked about?
- [114:28]
C
Well the piece that I wrote was, was basically the concept, it's just an overarching concept which is that implicit in the existence of Google since its founding was a bargain it had with content creators. And the deal and this is obviously the content creator or the website host perspective. But basically the idea was that look, okay, we'll let you spider our site and you can use a blurb our site, you can use the picture from a our site but in return we get a link, we let you gobble everything up and then you give us a link. That's the bargain. They started to violate this in 2012 when they came out with the little, with the summaries, forgot their call. But basically the summary of the, of the search, some, you know, siphoning off some of the tree instead of sending everybody to via links to other sites, they would sort of answer the question right there on the site. And then the great leap forward in this direction was what they announced@Google IO. And so obviously what we're going to see is a lot more people staying on the Google site than being spun off to other websites. It's already for some publishers have noticed in recent years that they get about 80% less. That's the most extreme case of the traffic they used to get. So this is, there are many different perspectives of this. One is, one is like where are they going the going to get the content to, you know, but they're double dipping basically. First they train their AI models on, on our content and then they use our AI content as part of the answer for serving up that, you know, basically taking that revenue that would have gone to whatever monetization you have on your website, advertising or whatever. And so this is a, this is a real problem. So I think, I think it's time even though it's been a creeping phenomenon to declare that Google is really betraying this bargain that it struck with content creators and websites. And so now we're in this position. Now if Our traffic continues to crash. What do we do? Do we just keep working as unpaid suppliers of content so that Google can serve these things up on its own site? Do we keep doing that? Do we, do we use robot text or whatever to block them from spidering our sites? Like, what is the response? And I don't have an answer to it, but I'm just saying, like, we need to, we need to figure out what we're going to do about this relationship we have with Google because it's not what we signed up for.
- [117:00]
B
Mike, if you go to line 125, this is a new story today. The, the UK regulators were telling Google that they had to allow publishers to operate opt out. And Google has said, we will allow publishers to opt out.
- [117:12]
A
They say they'll do it globally now.
- [117:14]
B
Right. And well, I mean, you might as well serve them a cup of hemlock because it's suicide.
- [117:19]
A
People are going, they say, wait, that won't impact your placement in regular searches.
- [117:24]
C
Yeah, right. But the, the problem is that that is giving up, right? There's less and less than you're giving up. So, so if you were to strike this bargain in 2011, okay, so I'm giving up all my traffic now. I'm, now I have a fraction of what I used to give. I mean, this is kind of the feeling that I, using social networks, right? Back in the day, used to get a lot. The social networks used to drive a lot of traffic via links. And now I look at, you know, the poster child for this phenomenon is X, formerly Twitter. Twitter used to drive a lot of traffic. I got 40,000 followers on Twitter, right? And I theoretically, and I post a link to one of my articles, I want people to read it, I want to be discovered, I want subscriptions to my newsletter and so on. I get like, you know, I don't know what it is. I get like, you know, six people click on the link or something like that. It's basically rounds to zero. And there's no point for me to be on X anymore except, you know, once every two months I'll get like 20 people click on the link. It's pathetic. This, the tiny numbers and even like the big publishers. I mean, the reason that, that I think it's the Guardian got off of X and a bunch of other publishers, massive publishers with millions of followers get like a couple hundred hundred people clicking on the links. And so when you decide to take a stand, for lack of a better term, and get off of that of a social media platform, you're really not giving up that much. You're giving up a little, but not much. And I think we're getting to the point of, the same point with Google. When you, when you opt out of Google, you're giving up something, but you're really not giving up that much. They're not driving that much traffic to your site.
- [119:00]
A
Yet in this same article from Engadget, the head of Conde Natural says, we're not saying that our traffic from Google will hit zero, but it's going to be single digits.
- [119:09]
B
They're planning on it. They're, they're doing worst case analysis.
- [119:11]
C
Mike.
- [119:12]
B
All right, but let me, let me go back to your provocation about attention versus attachment and say that I think that we were also passing out of the time of the content marketplace. Content was, pardon me for a plug, a Gutenberg idea. It was the thing that fit into these products that we had, that we thought of as public publications. And we, too often we think in our business that, that the value we create is entirely resident in this thing we call content. And I don't think that's right. I think it goes to your point. I think it's about relationships. And if you're going to depend upon getting links for your business, you're doomed. You've got to have relationships with people of trust, of value, and that's the way you're going to, going to have to manage in the future. And you will get discovered. You can get discovered through AI, but you can't depend on upon search or AI giving you links every day to this thing that you called content. That the truth is too many people are rewriting each other, recreating others content. They complain about copyright, but everybody rewrites all their other stuff and then they're hypocrites.
- [120:16]
C
That's why I like newsletters and always have, because you have a relationship with the subscriber. And if you go to another platform, if I at some point decide to pull up stakes in substack and move to Ghost or something like that, I can literally really take my subscribers with me. I can't take my, my substack notes. That's their little social network thing. I can't take those people with me. That's more like a Twitter model. But I can take the, the email newsletter subscribers with me to another platform because I have a relationship with them as, and the symbol of that relationship is, is that they've given me their email address. And so that's, that's what we have to do nowadays. Like you say, you have to have relationships. In your case, Jeff, you. You're writing a lot of books. You're not relying on social to drive links to your book sales. You're out there, you're public speaking. You're doing this.
- [121:06]
B
No, I'm not actually. I am relying on, on them to try to get people to discover the books.
- [121:11]
C
Yeah, I needed to, but, but, but it's nothing. It's nothing like what it used to be. And so that it just keeps weakening and weakening. And so this is one of the reasons why podcasts are so great, because you do have a relationship with the audience because you're a real person. Especially if it's video. That's like, really. You know, I used to be like, super into audio. I thought, well, that's, That's a great medium. It's less expensive, it's more important, it's more portable and so on. But videos become much more important because the more people are using AI and getting summaries of things for their content, the more they're seeing AI generated articles and AI generated videos, the more they value seeing a real person. Being a real person in a medium like this, where just. It's as close as you can get to just being in the room with some.
- [121:54]
A
Somebody. Yeah, you wouldn't want to be in this room, but yeah. Okay, I get the idea. I get what you're saying.
- [122:01]
C
It's the closest you can get to being in the attic with somebody. And so, but, but, no, but, but seriously, I think, I think that. I think that this is the beauty of, of, of podcasting is that it's. It's not a, it's not like a big show. Right. It's a conversation of real people. And, and so I, I think this is how we sell our content, basically, is we, like you say, you have to have a relationship. Relationship, in other words, which means you have to find the media that facilitate a relationship. That facilitate that relationship.
- [122:31]
B
And in that, you've got to bring value to people.
- [122:33]
C
Exactly.
- [122:33]
B
If you don't, if you're just repeating what everybody can find everywhere else, then don't bother.
- [122:37]
C
But I'll tell you this, I would not want to be starting out today.
- [122:40]
A
Oh, I know.
- [122:41]
C
Oh, my God. It's like that would be. That'd be. Open a restaurant hill to climb.
- [122:47]
A
That's why you get all these college graduates booing AI. Although if you were going to do a commencement speech, you might think, maybe I should not like AI so much. Ronny Cheng, who is one of the hosts of the Daily show and a standup comic was the commencement speaker at Harvard's class day event earlier this week. I can't play the. I can't play the speech.
- [123:12]
B
How good are you at beeping Benito?
- [123:15]
A
I will just read it. So he says, can I. A F word AI. F word AI. F word AI. Triggering rapturous applause. I'm glad you agree. It's so stupid. A lot of other respected graduation speakers at colleges around America are talking about you, about you guys needing to master AI for the future. I'm telling you, I'm here to tell you the mission of your generation is to destroy AI. I. You know, I don't know if that's the right thing to tell kids. But he said he addressed ongoing concerns that AI may lead to atrophying skills. That's true. I think that's true. You know, I think when you've got an automobile, your horse riding skills went way down as well.
- [124:06]
B
My abacus skills are just nowhere.
- [124:08]
A
I can't use an abacus to save my life. I learned. But particularly among students and a broader phenomenon experts have come to call cognitive. Cognitive surrender, in which users abandon their own reasoning to adopt the views of an AI model as their own. Hey, don't do that, kids. Okay? Bad idea. Ronnie said, I know someone sitting out there right now who is saying, what about the use of AI to pioneer breakthroughs in medicine and physics. If you're using it for that purpose, you're not the problem. I'm talking about the accumulation of cognitive debt due to excessive use of large language models. This is why you should be scared of AI. Anyway. Anyway, you can listen to it for yourself. But he certainly knew how to play. Now, do you think that was deceptively playing to the audience? I think it might have been.
- [124:55]
B
Comedy is comedy. Is that.
- [124:57]
A
Oh, that's right.
- [124:58]
C
Well, Conan o' Brien did, I think, the main commencement address at Harvard this year, and he said something a lot smarter and it was really interesting. He said, I understand the unprecedented difficulties you face today, including AI. AI. Luckily, AI is not a problem at Harvard. Here at here, professors have been able to quickly flag students use of AI thanks to the sophisticated AI software they use to grade papers. So I thought that was pretty funny. He got. He got applause for that because basically the students are not being allowed to use AI, but the professors are anyway.
- [125:33]
A
Oh, that's interesting, huh? Yeah. I don't know. It's an interesting challenge. If you're planning to take a trip this summer, says Fast company, beware, travel scams are being turbocharged by AI the number. According to a report from cybersecurity firm McAfee earlier this month, there are seven types of travel scams travelers are most likely to fall. Fake travel deals or promotions, scam booking confirmations, and travel updates. But this all happened before AI. AI manipulated or misleading accommodation listings. Come on. This is an AI payment request. Outside official platforms. Fake vacation rental listings, fake airline or hotel websites. I don't know. I don't know if I would blame AI for that.
- [126:24]
B
Well, it's the supercharging of this stuff.
- [126:26]
A
It's not just that it's always been here, but now it's even easier. Yeah, yeah. And companies are using Reddit to manipulate ChatGPT and Google AI. Search this from 404 for Jason Keebler. I love this story because this is about those peptide manufacturers. They've been posting in, you know, subreddits, like biohackers about their. How great their peptides are, knowing that AI will pick up the posts and add them. And then if people ask about the peptides, that text may well end up in the AIs results. So beware, I guess, of what you get, because bad guys will be bad guys.
- [127:09]
C
That's another thing that the Russian disinformation machine is doing. They're building hundreds of thousands of fake news websites just to get that into the training of the LLMs on hot topics like the war with Ukraine. But you're talking about how AI's doing travel scans. I've been scammed with travel only once, and that was well before the AI era. I went to CBIT many, many years ago, arranged this whole, you know, hotel situation, and I got there and nobody showed up. They were supposed to pick me up. And I went into a nearby hotel. I said, you know, do you have a room? Because I just got. And he's like, yeah, people walk in here all the time.
- [127:53]
B
Really?
- [127:54]
C
There's a guy who tells everybody to meet them. Meet him right out there on the street, street. And then he never shows up. And so that can be done. But, of course, I'm sure it's. It's much easier to do with AI. Much more convincing.
- [128:06]
A
I didn't. I kind of buried the lead. Because the good news is President Trump is here to protect us from AI. He did sign the executive order, or as the Register called it, the aieio saying, oh, we're gonna have oversight of AI models. It's a little bit diluted down, thanks to David's Sachs. Last month. The president was concerned.
- [128:32]
B
Voluntary.
- [128:33]
A
Yes.
- [128:33]
C
That's.
- [128:33]
B
That's as diluted as you can get.
- [128:35]
A
And instead of a window of 90 days, it's now 30 days. And if you would, if you please, if you would just submit your potential AI release to us ahead of time. 30 days, just to make sure we can look at it. And I don't know what they're going to do with it. Under the new order, tech companies would voluntarily give the government a window of up to 30 days to review their new AI models before releasing them to the public. No one's going to do this.
- [128:58]
C
No. I have the feeling what happened here, and this is again, just my feeling. This is not based on any specific knowledge, but just based on what I know about Trump, how the government works, etc. This is a probably a reaction to Claude Mythos.
- [129:11]
A
Yes.
- [129:12]
C
And basically, I'm sure that he was approached by people in the Pentagon, the NSA and other places saying, hey, man, when something like this is developed, we got to get our hands on it right away. And so I think this was initially a proposal to figure out how to, to steal this stuff or at least learn how it works because the, our adversaries are going to steal it, I. E. China, etc. And so, and so once they do. Right. But then he got pushed back from the AI companies who are, you know, you know, backers of his presidency and so on. And so I think that this is all just a thing that started out with like, okay, we, we got to get our hands on this. And then it became a political thing. And so he came out with this watered down version which is like, we're going to have this voluntary system where people us their new models and we're going to decide and nothing's going to happen. I, you know, I don't think we're going to hear a word about this after this week.
- [130:05]
A
Yeah, I agree.
- [130:07]
B
You know what?
- [130:07]
A
Sam Altman is meeting with the President today. Right. Probably right now.
- [130:12]
C
Yeah.
- [130:12]
A
He's got, you know what they're going to look, they understand again, it's transactional. You've got to do something. So, you know, maybe they'll offer it to him and, you know, get his input. They'll give them a drama. Nice.
- [130:26]
C
Pull a picture, list of information about it or something.
- [130:30]
B
Well, I guess the disaster scenario is you release a model, it's used to create horrible attacks on systems, and you didn't show it Right.
- [130:42]
A
Then you're liable. You should be liable. Yeah. All right, let's take a break and get our picks of the week in just a bit. You're watching Intelligent machines. Jeff Jarvis, Mike Elgin, filling in for Paris Martin O. Our show today, brought to you by you, our great club Twit members. Thank you so much. Yes, we are ad supported, but it only covers about 60 to 70% of our costs and if it weren't for the club, we'd have to cut back quite a bit. I want to keep doing the shows we do. I'm excited about some of the things that we do in the club. For 10 bucks a month, you get ad free versions of all the shows. But there's so much more. You also get access to the club Twit Discord, which is a really great place to hang out with smart people. You know what I learned? If people pay to be in a social network, they're better. The quality goes way up. There's also special programming we don't do anywhere else. For instance, we're going to cover Apple's keynote that is coming up June 8th. Micah Sargent and I will do our normal play by play, but because Apple takes us down or threatens to if we go on YouTube with it, we're only going to do that in the club. You have to, you have. I don't like paywalls. I'm not doing this to be a paywall just because we want to do it, but we just can't do it in public. So it's a private viewing of the Apple keynote. Those of us in the club will all view it together. The AI user group is coming up on Friday, 2pm that is a lot of fun. I'll show you what I've been doing with my agent, Hermes. We've got all sorts of stuff. Home theater geeks, the WWDC keynote note. Photo time with Chris Marquardt is coming up on the 19th. We've decided to do the fifth element for Micah's media club. So what we did with Stacy's book club, she does it every third month or every second month. And Micah's going to fill in the gaps in between with not a book, but something from media. Movies, TVs, books, musicals. Musicals.
- [132:39]
C
So this time.
- [132:41]
B
Oh, Ant. Ant music.
- [132:44]
A
So we. Micah picked three things and we had a poll and everybody picked the fifth Element, so. Which is a great Luc Besson movie. I loved it with
- [132:55]
C
Bruce Willis.
- [132:56]
A
Bruce Willis is that. And JoJo, arguably, arguably Chris Tucker is
- [133:01]
B
the first influencer on screen.
- [133:03]
A
Brilliant Chris Tucker performance. It is a really wonderful movie. Sci fi movie. I think we're going to have fun talking about. About that. That's June 19th at 2pm so that's right after the Chris Marquardt photo time. Micah's crafting corner is in July. He does that and now he's doing origami which is so cool. But you can bring whatever craft you're up to. That and a whole lot more. I hope you will join us. We are going to be doing the Jeff Atwood show. It's called off by one with Jeff Atwood, the best damn name and I just got the album art for it that Jeff's designed he wants to do. This is going to be interesting for his next episode which will be sometime in the next month. A choose your own adventure. So I think the way we're going to do this is he's going to we're going to start, we're going to do something and then he's going to have a poll in the club in the discord and you're going to pick what the next thing is will be. I don't know. I don't know. He's a crazy man. Whatever he decides it's going to be fun. Twit. TV Club Twit. It's worth the price of admission just to see what that juice your old adventure is. And you get a multi pass. No, you don't get a multi pass. You don't Twit. TV Club twit. We would love to have you in the club and it sure as heck helps us out a whole lot. You're supporting. Oh there's Chris Tucker. You're supporting. Indeed. Independent, not corporate owned media. That stands for the user, not the companies that are using us. So we're gonna have some fun. Twitter TV Club Twit Pick up. Marvel Television's Wonder man, an eight episode series now streaming on Disney plus a superhero remake.
- [134:54]
D
Not exactly what what we'd expect from an Oscar winning director.
- [134:57]
A
Action Simon Williams audition for Wonder Man.
- [135:01]
D
I'm gonna need you to sign this, assuming you don't have superpowers. I'll never work again. If anyone found out, my lips are sealed.
- [135:12]
A
Marvel Television's Wonder man all eight episodes now streaming only on Disney Experience. A membership that backs your business journey with American Express business Platinum. Earn 5 times Membership Rewards points on flights in prepaid hotels booked on amextravel.com/apply to find out your welcome offer which could be as high as 300,000 Membership Rewards points. American Express Business Platinum.
- [135:37]
D
There's nothing like it.
- [135:38]
A
Terms apply, welcome offers vary and you may not be eligible for an offer. Learn more@americanexpress.com Business Platinum the Week Time. So let's start with you, Mikey. I'll get our special guest.
- [135:56]
C
Thank you. Yeah. My pick of the week is Flipbook. You can find the free demo at Flipbook page. This is from a company that's based in San Francisco. They're, they're all members of South Park Commons and they have a vision for how AI as an informational tool tool can work. And it's almost entirely visual. So the idea is you just type in some concept, you know, call it, you know, how cotton candy works, or you know, how does the government work? Or, you know, any sort of like idea that you want to learn about. And what it does is it uses AI to produce a very pleasant looking graph just showing the concepts in a graphical form format. It's actually a pixelated image, it's a static image, but every part of it is linkable. So when you click on something, you go to another graph and you clip on something that graph, you go to another graph. It's been, it's been compared to HyperCard. Looks like it's an AI generated HyperCard. That's very visual. For example, look at this.
- [137:04]
A
So I asked it how, tell me how a computer works, works. And it, it drew this, it's got, so I can just click on different
- [137:11]
C
things like click on, click on any part of that, the keyboard, the key, whatever. And so now it's pretty slow. This is again, this is because it's
- [137:18]
A
generating it as I click on it, I guess.
- [137:20]
C
Exactly. It's generating and it's doing, doing all of the work behind the scenes. And so what they're working on this is a, this, they intend for this to be a real business, a real option for using AI to get information. And so one thing, once you see the result that after this, click again. It takes a little time. They're working on much faster versions and much more capable versions. Right. And you just keep drilling down. Now if you want to see how they intend for this to work for the paid versions, could be 50 bucks a month. Or it is 50 bucks a month. Go down to the bottom of that page, Leo, and there's a video.
- [137:51]
A
I would pay for this. I. Yeah, it's incredible.
- [137:53]
C
So now this video will show what they're working on all the way down to the bottom. There's a video thing there and you can click on that video and you see the transitions. This, they're working on this transitional effects that will zoom in like it looks, will actually zoom in on the images.
- [138:09]
A
So neat.
- [138:10]
C
Yes. And so this is a really cool concept and again there it's. It's 50 bucks a month for the paid version. The free version actually works. And the again, the free version is Flipbook Page. The paid version is flipbook page.com and I think this is just a great, a great concept and I'm going to
- [138:32]
A
steal this with my agent. That's what I'm going to do. And have my agent do this for. For our next trip. This would be really cool to have. We're going to visit Angkor Wat in Cambodia and I would love a 3D clickable zoomable model of it so that I can kind of prepare for our visit.
- [138:50]
C
Yeah, we're going to Machu Picchu next month.
- [138:53]
A
This will be great. I've been there twice. That is so cool. Same thing.
- [138:56]
C
Never, never been.
- [138:57]
A
Oh, it's incredible. Yeah, Very nice Flipbook page for the demo.
- [139:03]
B
It almost got the Linotype right? Not quite.
- [139:06]
A
I got one.
- [139:07]
D
I'm picky.
- [139:08]
C
They you. This has all this. This hallucinates exactly the same rate as the your favorite chatbots.
- [139:15]
A
So this is a pick for you, Jeff Jarvis.
- [139:17]
B
Oh good.
- [139:18]
A
It's. It's called Chipotle Max.
- [139:22]
B
Remember that?
- [139:23]
A
So remember that the Chipotle menu chooser on their website was actually based on an AI and not gated, not guarded. You could type in something like write me a Python script for sorting numbers and it would. So somebody has now built basically a Claude code for the Chipotle. Chipotle support bot. Not affiliated with Chipotle. They will probably sue us. Worth it. Chipotle I so you write type something like build me a carnitas burrito, double meat and Python. Make no mistakes. We'll give you. It's a fork of the open code chording harness. I think this is quite brilliant. I did not install it.
- [140:09]
B
God bless geeks.
- [140:10]
A
I figure by the time I would have it running, it would probably not work. But I don't know. If somebody does. Please. It goes. It logs into the Chipotle support bot and he talks about how he does it and it's the kind of thing you can point your AI at and it will do it. Now I want to show you actually what I pointed my AI at that you remember stumbleupon. Of course you do. Well, somebody has created something sort of like StumbleUpon. They call it Wander. It's at codeberg.org a guy named Susam has created it. Let me actually go to that website and show you.
- [140:51]
B
God, I hate dark mode.
- [140:53]
A
I can make it light mode. I'll make it light mode for you.
- [140:55]
D
It's okay.
- [140:57]
A
So the idea is it's a small, decentralized, self hosted, web consistent console that lets visitors to your website explore interesting websites and pages recommended by a community of independent. It's stumble upon, but it's also a web ring. And so what I did is I took this page, I said set up a Wander console on my website, seed it with sites we've referred to as our picks. Leo Paris's and Jeff's pics. We'll call it all who Wander are Not Lost. Lost. And it did it built this, took it about, oh, I don't know, 10 minutes, went through a few iterations. But let me, let me show you my Wander page. Here it. Here it is. So this is, this is on pages laporte Cloud based on what Wander it
- [141:51]
B
is one on the show.
- [141:53]
A
So what I did. So this is how Wandering works. You give it your, your pit, your picks. Right? In this case, I gave it the picks for our stuff.
- [142:07]
B
Okay.
- [142:07]
A
And what's wrong?
- [142:08]
B
Is there because we talked about it.
- [142:09]
C
Okay, yes.
- [142:09]
A
And, but also other stuff is there because it then picks up, it crawls the other Wander consoles and adds it. So every time. So all you have to do is push, push Wander and it'll pull up, up a. Sometimes it's a dead site, but it'll pull up a page and it's in the Wander console. You can't actually go to the page itself if you want, or you just keep pushing Wander. So it's just like StumbleUpon but it's with quirky sites which I've seeded with our sites that were pixed. But by now there are many, many other sites in there because it's crawled some of these.
- [142:45]
B
This is where the good old web goes to die. Memorial to it.
- [142:49]
A
It is, it is. It's great. It's, it's. And it's just really silly stuff. This is the guy who wrote it, Susan Powell. And it's a really great little thing. And yes, occasionally you'll get something that it can't do. And occasionally you'll go, oh, I remember Jeff. Or like this one. This is one that I picked Regex Blaster to train you in learning Regex. You'll occasionally get something that was picked on intelligent machines. I think, isn't that fun? I just think. And this is an example of how easy it is. All of these pages at laporte Cloud are hosted for free on cloudflare and written by my AI. So like I had it helped me vote in this crazy California primary. We had Yesterday probably blew up the computer. It had some very good recommendations. I told it. And so here it is. All who wander are not lost. This is my Wander console with intel, quirky sites from Intelligent Machines, picks, Leo, Jeff, Paris, and guest guests. And it'll have yours, Mike.
- [143:48]
C
Great.
- [143:49]
A
Actually, it should. That was a great pick, Jeff. Your pick.
- [143:53]
B
So circling back to our wonderful conversation with Robert Tursik, I want to show a few movies that were made entirely with AI cool. So line 182 is a movie called Dreams of Violence. It's about a radio Iran, and it was made for two. $2,000. And it's the first all AI movie that's going to be in a. Entered into a festival. This is Tribeca Festival.
- [144:20]
A
75 minutes.
- [144:22]
B
Yep. If you go to. There's, there's, you know, play without sound, but there's the. The trailer.
- [144:28]
A
And this is all AI There are no humans in this.
- [144:30]
B
Yes, yes. Because part of the problem that the filmmaker wanted was also, besides having to film something about Iran, was that he didn't want to have any real. Real people in it.
- [144:39]
D
He wanted.
- [144:40]
A
Didn't want anybody. Yeah.
- [144:44]
B
Very atmospheric. So this is a story, how it was done. It cost him $2,000 to make the movie using AI and I'm sure there's plenty of moments of. Of uncanny valley and things that don't quite fit, but it's pretty. This is what I was saying with Robert is the fact that someone can tell their story and create something using these tools. Tools in ways they never could have. Otherwise they wouldn't have passed the gauntlet of Hollywood. They wouldn't have had the expenses to do what they did. They can use this to say what they want to say.
- [145:13]
A
Amazing, isn't it?
- [145:14]
B
I find it just. This is the most exciting thing about AI to me. And then. And then there was another movie which cost more. Cost 40, $400,000, which is Hellgrinder, which was at. At Cannes but was not. Not an official entry, but was there. So it was also using AI One
- [145:30]
A
of the things I find with all of these AI movies, they're often violent and kind of horrific.
- [145:34]
D
I don't know.
- [145:35]
A
Oh, it's done in Hicksfield. Okay. This is another AI So Hicksfield did this to demonstrate their technology, right? Oh, it's widescreen. They all have a certain. There is a look. I mean, you can detect that look. But that's only a matter of time before that. That gets beat out of it.
- [145:55]
B
I don't like horror.
- [145:56]
A
No, I don't either. I'm gonna. I'M gonna close that window. Enough of that. Yeah, you can watch that in your own.
- [146:02]
B
So then Martin Scorsese, to add on, off here, is advising an AI company and he's getting all kinds of crap as a result. But he's saying, I used to make storyboards and it didn't say what I wanted it to say, and now I can. And the storyboard artists are going after him. Of course, this is the war we're going to be in. But I think Robert, our guest, Robert, is right. There's an inevitability to this and there's a reason that. Because it increases, potentially increases. Increases the creativity, the access to creativity, but also potentially in the long run, the work, because it can make things cheaper to make and more things can get made.
- [146:40]
C
One interesting thing about it is that he is on record as being somewhat anti cgi. So he's like against the superhero movies, right? He sort of leapfrogged the CGI and is embracing the AI.
- [146:51]
A
Yeah, well, as Robert pointed out. I don't know if it's so much
- [146:54]
B
about anti CGI with him though, because he abuses a lot of da aging stuff.
- [146:59]
A
Oh, yeah. Remember the De Niro movie? The Pacino De Niro movie on Netflix? That was not well done. That was really not well done. I think what Robert pointed out is that you're going to get the senior people who have nothing to risk, nothing to lose first on this bandwagon. But what they're doing it for is for the young people who are up and coming who are going to finally get a job chance. Just as YouTube made it possible for many people to create their vision, they're going to finally get a chance to do their creative work, even though they don't have the millions and millions of dollars it takes. But that's been the story of filmmaking. It used to. You had to buy film. Film stock alone was a huge expense.
- [147:41]
C
Right.
- [147:41]
A
So it's very. I think we're in an exciting time
- [147:44]
C
for just to go full circle on a reference that we made earlier. So you're. You're looking at the movie and the. In the, in the. The club, right? Based on the name Fifth Element, starring Bruce Willis. Bruce Willis is actually one of the first people to license his image. This is using deep fake technology for a Russian telecom ad. So there's a. They made a. He was already starting to have dementia from, from his condition. And. And so they use a sort of younger version of. Of Bruce Willis to do this sort of telecom ad in Russia. And all he did was Just sign a contract granting them the license to use his image. And they just did all the video and all the. Everything. His voice and everything was computer, you know, AI generated. And so there it is. That's it.
- [148:32]
A
Yeah. Authorized deep fake.
- [148:34]
C
Yep.
- [148:36]
A
Fascinating. We live in interesting times. And that's what this show is all about. I hope you will watch Intelligent Machines. Every Wednesday we do it at 2pm Pacific, 5pm Eastern. Eastern, 2100 UTC. You can watch us live if you want in the club, of course, in the discord. But also everybody can watch live on YouTube, Twitch X, Facebook, LinkedIn and Kik after the fact, on demand versions of the show at Twitt, TVIM or wherever you get your podcasts or on YouTube. There's a YouTube video channel. Mike Elgin, you are the best MachineSociety AI. Thank you for filling.
- [149:13]
B
Thank you for stepping.
- [149:14]
A
I see right behind you a chatterbox. A giant chatterbox.
- [149:19]
C
That's right. I'm at Kevin's desk. He's out of town on business and I'm taking over his workspace here.
- [149:24]
A
Kevin, your son was the founder of this really cool AI tool. It's at. Hello, chatterbox.com that teaches. Well, it was originally a smart speaker. Right. But there is AI in it that teaches kids what's going on inside an AI device.
- [149:41]
C
Pivoted it to a. To a tool that helps kids understand LLMs and chatbots and how they work and how that's smart. It's. AI literacy is always the goal to, to sort of take. He's. He's concerned that kids will grow up and their relationship with AI will be that it's kind of a black box and that they're disempowered to do anything about it. And so he wants to show them that they can build the device and then they can train it and understand it so they can, when they grow up into this world where LMS and, and AIs can be everywhere, that they'll understand how it all works and feel some agency, that they can use it creatively, that they can understand it.
- [150:19]
A
Nice. By the way, the one behind you is not actual size.
- [150:23]
C
It's gigantic. Where is it?
- [150:25]
A
It's small. In fact, there's pictures of the kids on the webpage holding it.
- [150:28]
C
That's the size of a basketball.
- [150:30]
A
Yeah, that's the size. That's the actual size. Very cool. Very, very cool project.
- [150:35]
C
Yeah.
- [150:35]
A
Thank you, Mike. Great to see you. Really appreciate it.
- [150:37]
C
Thank you.
- [150:38]
A
Jeff Jarvis's new book, Hot Type, is available for pre order. It'll be out in August.
- [150:43]
B
The audio book is 2/3 red, so we'll be have that out too.
- [150:47]
A
You're going back tomorrow to read some more. Do they give you a break to rest your voice or did you tell them no after I just said I
- [150:54]
B
had to have Wednesday off because the podcast. And it's a good thing I was, I was. Earlier today, I thought, I don't know if I can do the podcast. My voice was set in the sun. Yeah. Jesus.
- [151:03]
A
Yeah. But get a copy of the recording because when you die, we want to make a virtual Jeff and that'll be enough to really do that. So just a little.
- [151:11]
B
But it's a certain kind of Jeff.
- [151:14]
A
It's the reader. It's the Hal Holbrook Jeff.
- [151:16]
B
Yes.
- [151:19]
A
Jeff, it's always a pleasure. Thank you so much for being here. Thank you all for watching and we appreciate the support of the great Club Twit members. We will see you right here next week on Intelligent Machines. Hey everybody, it's Leo Laporte. You know about MacBreak weekly, right? You don't? Oh, if you're a Macintosh fan or you just want to keep up what's going on with Apple, this is the show for you. Every Tuesday, Andy Inaco, Alex Lindsay, Jason Snell and I get together and talk about the week's Apple news. It's an easy subscription. Just go to your favorite podcast client and search for Mac Break Week weekly or visit our website, TWiT TV MBW. You don't want to miss a week of Mac Break Weekly. You can't reason with the sun. Trust us, we've tried. This summer, it's time to put that angry ball of fire on mute. Columbia's Omnishade technique technology is engineered to protect you from the sun's harsh rays that can burn and damage your skin. The sun is relentless, but so is our gear. Level up your summer@columbia.com to spend more time outside and less time slathering on aloe lotion. You're welcome, Columbia Engineered for whatever.
- [152:41]
D
Some follow the noise.
- [152:43]
A
Bloomberg follows the money. Because behind everybody headline is a bottom line. Whether it's the funds fueling AI or
- [152:52]
B
crypto's trillion dollar swings.
- [152:54]
A
There's a money side to every story. And when you see the money side,
- [152:59]
D
you understand what others miss. Get the money side of the story.
- [153:03]
A
Subscribe now@bloomberg.com.
- [153:10]
B
Athletic Brewing Company crafts award winning non alcoholic beers for those who want to be part of every every round. With over 185 flavor awards, they're exceptional NA beers that fit your lifestyle and any social occasion. Summer's full of good times, and Athletic fits right in. Go to athleticbrewing.com to have brews delivered to your door, or find them at a bar, restaurant or store near you. Near Beer Athletic Brewing Co. Fit for all times.