This Week in Space 158: Hubble's 35th Birthday

Summary

Episode Overview

In episode 158 of This Week in Space titled "Hubble's 35th Birthday," hosts Rod Pyle and Tarek Malik celebrate the enduring legacy of the Hubble Space Telescope. Released on April 25, 2025, the episode delves into significant space-related topics, including potential NASA budget cuts, the discovery of the Hercules Corona Borealis Great Wall, and China's latest advancements in space exploration. The highlight of the episode is an in-depth interview with renowned space scientist and veteran astronaut, Dr. John Grunsfeld, affectionately known as the "Hubble Hugger" for his pivotal role in servicing missions.

NASA Budget Cuts and Administrative Insights

The episode opens with a discussion on the looming threat of substantial budget cuts to NASA, particularly affecting its science and astrophysics programs. Rod Pyle references a report from Space News Today detailing inquiries posed to Jared Isaacman, the incoming NASA Administrator, regarding proposed 50% reductions in the science budget.

Rod Pyle notes, "Jared Isaacman is now on the record. He says a 50% reduction to NASA’s science budget does not, and I quote, appear to be an optimal outcome" (04:37). Isaacman emphasizes his commitment to advocating for strong investments in space science, astrophysics, and Earth science, signaling potential resistance to the proposed cuts. However, uncertainty remains as budget decisions continue to evolve.

Understanding the Hercules Corona Borealis Great Wall

Tarek Malik and Rod Pyle then explore the discovery of the Hercules Corona Borealis Great Wall, the largest known structure in the universe. This colossal supercluster spans approximately 10 million light-years and was originally identified 11 years prior to the episode's release.

Tarek Malik shares his excitement, stating, "This is absolutely crazy... we've been able to refine their observations with ground and space-based instruments... this was one of our most successful science stories of the week" (06:43). The Great Wall's discovery was enhanced through the analysis of gamma-ray bursts, allowing astronomers to better understand its vastness and proximity relative to Earth.

China's Shenzhou 20 Mission to Tiangong Space Station

The hosts also discuss China's ongoing advancements in space exploration, highlighted by the recent launch of the Shenzhou 20 crew to the Tiangong Space Station. This mission marks China's ninth crewed flight, showcasing the country's robust crew rotation capabilities.

Rod Pyle remarks, "This really demonstrates that they have this crew rotation operations fairly well in hand..." (08:26). Additionally, China has signed an agreement to train astronauts from Pakistan, marking the first international astronaut collaboration for the Tiangong program. This development comes at a time when the future of the International Space Station remains uncertain, potentially leading to increased international cooperation in space.

Personal Anecdotes from the Hosts

Amidst the technical discussions, the hosts share personal stories to add a human touch to the episode. Rod Pyle updates listeners on his Labrador mix, Charlie, who recently underwent tumor surgery. Simultaneously, they celebrate Tarek Malik's 48th birthday, reminiscing about his past, including his humorous stint driving a Saturn LS.

In-Depth Interview with Dr. John Grunsfeld

The core of the episode features an insightful interview with Dr. John Grunsfeld, whose extensive career with NASA encompasses roles as an astronaut, chief scientist, and key figure in the servicing of the Hubble Space Telescope.

John’s Journey to NASA and the Astronaut Corps

John Grunsfeld recounts his childhood inspirations, influenced by the burgeoning space program of the 1960s and the scientific accomplishments of figures like Enrico Fermi. His passion for astronomy and physics led him to pursue a career that seamlessly blended scientific research with space exploration.

The Hubble Space Telescope: Deployment and Early Challenges

Reflecting on Hubble's launch, Grunsfeld describes the tense moments during deployment. The initial mission faced critical challenges, including a malfunctioning solar array. He recalls, "Kathy Thornton and Bruce McCandless... were ready to manually crank out the solar arrays, but fortunately, the ground was able to uplink a command..." (18:01). This swift problem-solving ensured Hubble's successful deployment.

Servicing Missions: Engineering Marvels and Spacewalks

Grunsfeld details his experiences during Hubble's servicing missions, emphasizing the complexity and precision required for spacewalks (EVAs). Performing a total of eight spacewalks, he explains the rigorous training involved: "For every hour doing a spacewalk, we trained about 12 hours in the pool... It's probably more like 15, 20 hours for every hour in space" (30:35). He highlights the ingenuity required to modify and utilize tools in the unforgiving environment of space, often improvising with household tools to address unforeseen challenges.

Hubble’s Scientific Legacy and Discoveries

Hubble's contributions to astrophysics are profound. Grunsfeld discusses its role in measuring the universe's expansion, leading to the groundbreaking discovery of dark energy—a mysterious force causing the universe's accelerated expansion. He mentions, "Adam Reese... found that the universe looked like it was accelerating... which led to the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2011" (52:07). Additionally, Hubble has enabled the observation of celestial phenomena dating back to almost the universe's inception, providing invaluable data for astronomers worldwide.

The Future of Space Telescopes and Servicing Capabilities

Looking ahead, Grunsfeld outlines plans for next-generation telescopes such as the Roman Space Telescope and the prospective Habitable Worlds Observatory. He envisions robotic servicing missions as a sustainable model for maintaining and upgrading space-based observatories, ensuring their longevity and scientific relevance. "By 2045, we should have very capable servicing robots... that's what we're thinking. Make it so easy even a robot can do it" (67:42).

Advocacy for NASA's Science Budget

The discussion shifts back to the critical issue of NASA's funding. Grunsfeld passionately argues against significant budget cuts, emphasizing the multifaceted benefits of space science. He states, "Every dollar invested in NASA is about 7 to $9 in GDP... you would invest more in NASA, not less" (56:39). The hosts and Grunsfeld advocate for public engagement, urging listeners to contact their congressional representatives to support NASA's science initiatives.

Conclusion and Final Thoughts

As the episode wraps up, the hosts reiterate the importance of maintaining and advancing NASA's scientific missions. Rod Pyle encourages listeners to stay informed and involved, while Tarek Malik celebrates his birthday amidst the broader discussions of space exploration's future.

Rod Pyle concludes, "If you're watching this podcast, but if you don't call, they don't know and they make decisions based on what their constituents... say is important" (66:32). The episode serves as both a celebration of Hubble's remarkable journey and a rallying call to protect and advance space science for future generations.

Key Takeaways

• Hubble Space Telescope's Enduring Legacy: Celebrating 35 years of groundbreaking discoveries and the critical role of servicing missions in extending its lifespan and capabilities.

• NASA Budget Concerns: Highlighting proposed significant cuts to NASA's science budget and advocating for continued or increased investment to maintain scientific leadership and economic benefits.

• Future of Space Telescopes: Emphasizing the need for next-generation observatories and the potential of robotic servicing to ensure their sustainability and advancement.

• Public Engagement: Urging listeners to actively support NASA by communicating with their congressional representatives to voice the importance of space science.

Notable Quotes

• Rod Pyle on Isaacman's Stance: "Jared Isaacman is now on the record. He says a 50% reduction to NASA’s science budget does not, and I quote, appear to be an optimal outcome" (04:37).

• Tarek Malik on the Great Wall: "This was actually one of our most successful science stories of the week..." (06:43).

• John Grunsfeld on Spacewalk Training: "For every hour doing a spacewalk, we trained about 12 hours in the pool..." (30:35).

• Grunsfeld on Dark Energy Discovery: "Adam Reese... found that the universe looked like it was accelerating... which led to the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2011" (52:07).

• Grunsfeld on NASA Investment: "Every dollar invested in NASA is about 7 to $9 in GDP... you would invest more in NASA, not less" (56:39).

Final Thoughts

Episode 158 of This Week in Space offers a comprehensive look at the Hubble Space Telescope’s illustrious history and its pivotal role in modern astronomy. Through engaging discussions and expert insights from Dr. John Grunsfeld, listeners gain a deeper appreciation for the challenges and triumphs of maintaining and advancing one of humanity’s most cherished scientific instruments. The episode also serves as a timely reminder of the importance of supporting space science amidst evolving budgetary landscapes.

Transcript

[Tarek Malik]

Coming up on this week in space, NASA's next chief weighs in on potential budget cuts. There's a great wall in space. And what's the deal with the Hubble space telescope 35 years later? We've got the original Hubble hugger, John Grunsfeld himself to tell us the skinny. Tune in podcasts you love from people you trust.

[Rod Pyle]

This is trit. This is this Week in space, episode number 158 recorded on April 25, 2025, Hubble's 35th birthday. Hello and welcome to another episode of this Week in Space, the Hubble's future edition. Among many other things. I'm Rod Pyle, of course editor in chief at Aston magazine. And I'm joined by my fellow non mathematician Tarek Malik, editor [e-mail]. hello, partner.

[Tarek Malik]

Hello. It's my birthday, right? Hey, happy birthday. It's our special birthday episode for Hubble Space Telescope, but also me. So.

[Rod Pyle]

Wow, a way to be low key. I forgot or I. I would have made you another song. I think this is the first year I've gone without giving you something. No, of course you never returned the favor. So that's.

[Tarek Malik]

You give me the gift of friendship.

[Rod Pyle]

I give you the gift of talents. Oh, there we go. The groupies weigh in. In a few minutes we're going to be joined by Dr. It's okay, you can had a total blow out there. In a few minutes we're going to be joined by Dr. John Grunsfeld, former NASA as astronaut, former NASA chief scientist. He's got a whole list of qualifications that I'll read when he comes on. But perhaps most importantly, the guy who made was it five house calls on the Hubble space.

[Tarek Malik]

Three. Three out of the five.

[Rod Pyle]

The five shuttle flights. That's right.

[Tarek Malik]

Yeah. So he's the Hubble hugger.

[Rod Pyle]

Yeah. And Rod's the screw up, the first act of the show. You should really do it again, guy. All right, before we start, please don't forget to do a solid. Make sure to like subscribe and the other good podcast things. We're counting on you to to keep us popular and beloved. And now a space joke from listener Paul Woolley. Paul, are we going to have a sting for that? I guess not. Hey, Tarek.

[Tarek Malik]

Yes, Rod?

[Rod Pyle]

What do astronauts do right after landing on Mars?

[Tarek Malik]

I don't know. What do they do?

[Rod Pyle]

They post a selfie and wait eight minutes for the likes to arrive.

[Tarek Malik]

What did it take? 16 minutes because it would take eight minutes to get to Earth and then eight minutes to get back Right, Yeah, picky, picky.

[Rod Pyle]

I know. I just, I just didn't want to rewrite his joke. But yeah, and it also depends on the points of the orbit. It could be up to 40, but.

[Tarek Malik]

I still dig it.

[Rod Pyle]

Okay, let me try, let me try it again. They post a selfie and wait a while for the lights to arrive. How's that? Now I've heard that, I've heard that some people want to fly in a repair mission when it's joke time on this show. But you can help and repair us by sending your best, worst or most indifferent space joke to us at twistswit tv. All right, now that I totally bollocks that, let's go to some headlines.

[Tarek Malik]

Headline news. Headline news.

[Rod Pyle]

Now on the tongues of many, as it should be, are the NASA budget cuts, both across the board and specifically to the science budget. And we're going to be talking about that later on in this episode as we, we have continually anyway. But also no less than Jared Isaacman. That's right, future administrator of NASA is not a fan of those cuts.

[Tarek Malik]

Yeah, I know. This came from Space News Today. Jeff Faust over there has a great write up that basically, you know, we talked a bit in a past episode where Jared Isaacman had his Senate hearing for confirmation as NASA administrator. Now, those senators sent him questions back from that hearing that they wanted to know more. And included in them were questions about the proposed 50% budget cuts which came after his hearing. And in fact, Senator Maria Cantwell of a Democrat from Washington asked him pretty much straight out if he supports the cut, according to Jeff Faustin, Space News. And Isaac man is now on the record. He says he hasn't reviewed or been a party to those official discussions, but that a 50% reduction to net NASA science budget does not, and I quote, appear to be an optimal outcome. Like, he doesn't think that it makes sense. And, and, and he, he said that if he, you know, if he is confirmed, you know, he will advocate for strong investment in space science, astrophysics, Earth science. He says as well, which is very interesting in when he was answering another, another question from another senator. So, so it, it seems like NASA's or Trump, the Trump administration's pick for it to lead NASA. And the proposed budgets that are being, that were leaked earlier aren't really on the same page currently. And it is something that we're gonna have to watch develop over time because right now, like he could face coming into an agency without having any agency over the actual budget because the cuts would have been made by Then so.

[Rod Pyle]

We'Re, we're gonna probably by design.

[Tarek Malik]

Yeah, very possibly, you know.

[Rod Pyle]

Yeah. That's unfortunate. All right, next up next tour from Space.com because we love Space.com's no bias at all.

[Tarek Malik]

No.

[Rod Pyle]

This is remarkably unclick baity for you. Largest structure in the universe is bigger and closer to earth than we knew. Is it a threat?

[Tarek Malik]

The jury is still out on what it all means is what the subhead is not is it a threat? Oh my gosh, no. This one is from my colleague Rob Lee over at, @space.com and I thought this was really fun because this was actually one of our most successful science stories of the week and it is about the so called Hercules, Corona Borealis, Great Wall, which I think is an awesome name for my band if you guys can pre order now. Right. But, but it's this, it's this super cluster of galaxies that like line up in space into a filament of the web. So it's like some of the first galaxies in the universe and it is, it's crazy because it was first discovered about 11 years ago. 11 years ago. 2014. Is that nine years ago? Nine years ago. Not 11.

[Rod Pyle]

It's 11 years ago.

[Tarek Malik]

It is 11 years ago. I was right.

[Rod Pyle]

So wow.

[Tarek Malik]

It is. This is why we do news.

[Rod Pyle]

Yeah. I love it.

[Tarek Malik]

I leave the math to the writers though. It's 10 million light years wide. It's like it covers an area like 10 billion light years by 7.2 billion light years. I mean it's like a billion light years thick. It's absolutely crazy. It's huge, huge thing. And what we discovered now is that it's even bigger than they thought. I mean they've been able to refine their observations with ground and space based instruments out there. And now we know that they can use gamma ray bursts, which is how they, they did this. They, they looked for gamma ray bursts throughout the structure and were able to piece that together through like distance calculations to see exactly how far away it is, how, how large it is, et cetera. To refine it. This, this absolutely blew my mind this week because you know, I've been here 20, whatever plus years and I, I guess I forgot that this thing even existed, let alone the fact that it was so massive and yet out there, you know, so very interesting discovery and I'll, you know, we should go there, we should go to this great wall and, and go check it out. Right?

[Rod Pyle]

Well, I, I think we should put that big space blob on a zic, but it, it Is more importantly, it.

[Tarek Malik]

Is a great wall you can see from space because it is in space. Right. Does that.

[Rod Pyle]

Sure, sure thing.

[Tarek Malik]

Okay.

[Rod Pyle]

Okay. Last, not least, China launches the Shenzhou 20 crew to the Tiangong Space Station. The. The. Their new modular. Newish modular space station. And that's a program that's going strong.

[Tarek Malik]

Yeah, yeah. This is from Mike Waller, space flight editor [e-mail] and it was on, on. Was it Wednesday? It was on Wednesday, right? Yeah, it was on April 24th. It was Thursday actually. They launched their latest mission. It's their ninth crewed flight to the Tiangong Space Station, which if people don't know, is China's national space station. It is shaped like a giant T for Tariq. But also just because that's the Easy.

[Rod Pyle]

Oh my God. Oh my Lord.

[Tarek Malik]

And so, and, but what's interesting though is that this really demonstrates that they have this crew rotation operations fairly well in hand. They're on a stretch of a series of uninterrupted missions, which I think is really interesting. And in fact, just last week, and I don't think we talked about this on the podcast, China inked an official agreement to train astronauts from Pakistan to fly to Tiangong. That's their first international astronaut agreement. And it could be one of many now that the International Space Station's days are numbered, that we know maybe by the end of the decade it could, it could be reentered. So just something definitely to watch over time and, and we'll see if the space station grows because they said that they're not going to rule out adding more modules to make an even larger space station over time.

[Rod Pyle]

All right, and very good. Thank you for that. And before we go to our first break and come back with Dr. Grunsfeld, I just wanted to tell people that my lovely 12 year old Labrador mix, Charlie went in for tumor surgery yesterday.

[Tarek Malik]

Oh, Charlie.

[Rod Pyle]

Picture of Charlie basking in the sun a few years back. He's a little younger then, so if everybody could send him good thoughts because the surgery was bigger than we anticipated and kind of looks like he was the loser in a saw the lady in half contest on a magic show somewhere. I mean, it's literally from his spine down to his stomach. So he's, he's not a happy camper today, Charlie. I appreciate that. And because it's Tarek's birthday, I have a little known fact about Tarek Malik to share.

[Tarek Malik]

What? What is this? What is this? What? What are you going to share to everyone? What? What? Dark skeletons from my closet Are you.

[Rod Pyle]

Squirming in your briefs there, pal?

[Tarek Malik]

A little bit. A little bit, right.

[Rod Pyle]

I learned yesterday that Tarek Malik used to drive a Saturn ls, right? Yeah, yeah. Which was kind of like it was the Pontiac Aztec of its time. Somehow he thought that was a date magnet. And I just thought that was really fascinating because it had a pointy nose, you said?

[Tarek Malik]

Yeah, it was a very sleek. It was. You know, it was named after a planet. I named it Molly. It was great. Now it's like a cube in a junkyard after being told totaled on Hollywood Avenue way back when.

[Rod Pyle]

Well, it's good to understand what a lonely man you were back in your youth. All right, so this is great. Let's go to a quick break and we'll be right back with the rest of the show. Stand by.

[John Grunsfeld]

So when I ask, what is Odoo, what comes to mind? Well, Odoo is a bit of everything. Odoo is a suite of business management software that some people say is like fertilizer because of the way it promotes growth. But you know, some people also say Odoo is like a magic beanstalk because it grows with your company and is also magically affordable. But then again, you could look at Odoo in terms of how its individual software programs are a lot like building blocks. I mean, whatever your business needs, manufacturing, accounting, HR programs, you can build a custom software suite that's perfect for your company. So what does Odoo? Well, I guess Odoo is a bit of everything. Odoo is a fertilizer, magic beanstalk. Building blocks for business. Yeah, that's it. Which means that Odoo is exactly what every business needs. Learn more and sign up [e-mail] that's.

[Charlie]

O-O-O.com attention sports enthusiasts. Keep the adrenaline pumping and elevate your game day with Chumba Casino. It's completely free to play, no purchase necessary. Whether you're cheering from the stands, on the move or relaxing at home, Chumba Casino brings the thrill of social casino directly to your fingertips. Experience the ultimate social casino adventure. With reels of casino style games. Offering hundreds of exciting options to choose from and fresh new releases every week, there's always something new and thrilling to explore. From action packed social slots and classic blackjack to engaging bingo in solitaire, the fun never stops. Plus, enjoy generous daily login bonuses and a fantastic free welcome bonus to kickstart your social gaming journey. Dive into the excitement. Discover a world where you can play for your chance to redeem some serious prizes and have a blast along the way. Don't miss out. What are you waiting for? Join now and immerse yourself in non stop fun and adventure with Chumba Casino. Get in on the action [e-mail] and make every day a Chamba Day. No purchase necessary VGW Group void board prohibited by law 18/ DNC supply race the rudders. Race the sails. Race the sails. Captain, an unidentified ship is approaching. Over. Roger, Wait.

[Tarek Malik]

Is that an enterprise sales solution?

[Charlie]

Reach sales professionals, not professional sailors. With LinkedIn ads, you can target the right people by industry, job title and more. We'll even give you a $100 credit on your next campaign. Get started [e-mail] results, terms and conditions apply.

[Rod Pyle]

And we are back with Dr. John Grunsfeld. Let me read the list. Former NASA astronaut, former associate administrator of the NASA Science Mission Directorate, veteran of five shuttle flights, NASA chief scientist, former NASA chief scientist, former deputy director of the Space Telescope Science Institute, and a whole bunch of other things with a Ph.D. in physics and a list of awards and accomplishments that are truly humbling. Hello John, and thanks for joining us today.

[Charlie]

Hello, my pleasure.

[Rod Pyle]

Oh, and I shouldn't forget you're a number of associations including, which stuck out to me, the American Alpine Club, as well as the American Astronomical Society, aiaa, AAAS and the Experimental Aircraft Association. So I guess the one there that sort of sticks up for those of us who are somewhat used to talking with the top level people in the space trade is the American Alpine Club. What got you started mountain climbing?

[Charlie]

Well, I, you know, I grew up in my very, you know, impressionable years in the 1960s and two interesting things happened, one of which of course was the start of the space program. I was born in 1958, so I'm a baby of NASA. But as I was growing up and very impressionable, I saw, I remember the Gemini flights. I used to have a little John Young Gemini lunchbox, metal lunchbox, but also Americans started climbing in the big mountains with the Europeans and others. Through the pages of National Geographic, I got to see people like Whitaker climbing Mount Everest and I thought that would be cool. I grew up in Chicago, so not a lot of mountains there. But that always striked my fascination. And then around the third grade because I was asked to do a biography of Enrico Fermi and I was so disappointed I didn't get somebody famous. But it, you know, it changed my life in a way. And Enrico Fermi, of course, the famous physicist who fled fascist Italy to the US Helped Develop the first self containing atomic pile at the University of Chicago. And in fact, it was only maybe a mile away from my house. We were in urban renewal housing on the south side of Chicago. And so I could ride my bike over to where Fermi built that. But more importantly, he loved mountaineering and he wrote about how he missed the Dolomites where he climbed as a postdoc. And so in a way, I've kind of tried to model my life of physics, cosmic ray physics and personal life, but I love to climb mountains. And so I joined the American Alpine Club many years ago.

[Rod Pyle]

So we have a vaguely similar origin story, but our lives took extremely different directions. But I do have to ask, since we were born within about a year of each other, did you have Major Matt Mason toys?

[Charlie]

No, I did not.

[Rod Pyle]

Really? Oh, that was Mattel's man in Space. That was my inspiration. Although it didn't get me a doctorate in physics. Okay, Tarek, you're out. Sorry.

[Tarek Malik]

Well, well, thank you again, John, for joining us today. Especially today as we're recording it, it's Hubble Deployment Day, right, the anniversary. 35 years ago today as we're recording it, the Hubble space television was released into the void to then open its eye on the cosmos. And of course, the rest is history. But I'm curious how you got to where you are now, John. I mean, if that path to an astronaut, to physics was something that. I mean, it sounds like you're talking about Enrico Fermi, that it was there at the, at the get go. But was the space angle in all of this there at the same time because of that Gemini interest, the space program that was going on back then? Or, or was that something that came up through your studies, becoming a physicist, et cetera?

[Charlie]

Well, I have absolutely no doubt that the influence of the early space program put me on the path to become an astronaut. We lived close to an A and P grocery store. I don't even think they exist anymore. And so I would see the big trucks come back and, you know, back into the space and they would unload the trucks. And so as a young kid, I wanted to be a commercial truck driver. And at about the age of six or seven, having seen, you know, the space launches and the ticker tape parades, I declared to my mother I wanted to be an astronaut. And she thought that was actually great because it would encourage my nascent interest in science. This is before Enrico Fermi, and there's zero chance I would ever actually become an astronaut. So she didn't have to worry about blowing up on a rocket. So I certainly fooled her. But that background interest in space, I followed Gemini, I followed Apollo, Skylab, and of course, the early space shuttle program as I was exploring my interest in science. I love all kinds of natural science, but in particular, looking up at the stars and wondering what's out there was the highest priority. That's what drove me in physics, in astrophysics, eventually going to college and studying physics and becoming an experimentalist. I built instruments that went up on high altitude balloons and then continued that in my graduate studies at the University of Chicago. I had a balloon experiment that I was working on, but also we had the Chicago Cosmic Ray Nuclei Experiment that flew in 1985 on space shuttle Challenger. My PhD thesis was actually derived from that shuttle flight. Of course, that's the year before the tragic loss of challenger in 1986. But as I was going through elementary school, you know, up through high school, I just assumed that by the time I was an adult, by the time I was a practicing astrophysicist, that all astronomers would go to space. Right? It seems like the natural thing. And at that time, you know, that was kind of the. The rhetoric, you know, that space by the, you know, 1990s would become routine. So it wasn't until I had my PhD that I applied to NASA the first time for the space shuttle program. And, you know, I thought, okay, well, if I want to be an astronaut, this is how you do it. And I filled out the application, sent it in, thinking, you know, okay, we'll see what happens. And months later, I got a call from Dwayne Ross at the Johnson Space Center. He was the head of the Astronaut Selection office. And he said, hey, John, are you still interested in becoming an astronaut? And I was sitting at my desk at Caltech at the time, and I said, well, of course. And he said, well, we'd like you to come down for an interview. And I said, sure. And I assume they must interview thousands of people. And I arrived and there were, I think, 12 people in my interview group. And I had no clue what was going on, what the protocol was, what I should prepare for, But I did well. And I was told that they interviewed a bunch of scientists and that they picked two. And they picked Jim Newman and Tom Jones for the class of 1990. And I was ranked number three. And they encouraged me to reapply, which I did. And so in 1992, I was selected into the Astronaut Candidate Program, and then a year later graduated.

[Tarek Malik]

So that is really interesting because I knew that you joined in 1992. But now you're saying you applied in 1990, which is when Hubble launched there. So you're in an interesting spot because you were on the science side before becoming an astronaut as Hubble, you know, launched into space and, and had, we're going to talk a little bit about, about that relationship too in a bit. And then, and then you became, you, you became an astronaut and later on, you know, ended up working on that. So I just, I find that that split of being a scientist first with this instrument that everyone was excited about at that point in time and then giving you a really unique perspective when you get your hands on, on, on the, the telescope itself. But we should ask about the Hubble Space Telescope now because that is the, the soup du jour. It's why, it's why, you know, we hope to talk to you. I'm really curious about that relationship with Hubble. Like what, what, what does it mean to you now 35 years later? And, or. Rob, do you want to go to a break first or should we.

[Rod Pyle]

Why don't we go ahead and take quick break because I think this is going to be a really juicy answer.

[Tarek Malik]

Oh, you know, I'm going to get carried away.

[Charlie]

So I will tell you that, you know, when people ask, you know, when did you start training to repair the Hubble Space Telescope? You know, my pithy answer is at birth. With that, we can go to break.

[Rod Pyle]

Okay, we'll be right back, Everybody. Stand by.

[John Grunsfeld]

25 years ago, a small group of business and government leaders met in Washington, D.C. they envisioned the creation of an independent nonprofit organization with a mission to help people, businesses and government mitigate the growing threat of cyber attacks. Today, the center for Internet Security embodies that vision. For 25 years, it's worked with a global community of IT and cybersecurity experts to develop the CIS benchmarks and CIS critical security controls. These proven security best practices defend against common cyber threats and streamline compliance with industry frameworks, regulations and standards. Today, CIS provides cybersecurity services, threat intelligence and critical resources to help public and private sector organizations alike strengthen their Cyber defenses. Visit cisecurity.org today. That's the letters cisecurity.org to find out how CIS can help your organization as we create confidence in the connected world.

[Tarek Malik]

Trading shouldn't have barriers. When Robinhood started, it was built to make trading more accessible. Now Robinhood offers more sophisticated trading tools. Experience the future of trading on Robinhood Legend, the all new desktop platform that harnesses intuitive design to deliver a seamless experience for traders free to use with a Robinhood account. Robinhood Legend is designed for how you trade with powerful charts, including custom intervals down to the tick and over 80 indicators and drawing tools. Trade all your favorite assets, including popular stocks and ETFs, all in one place. Take your trading to the next level by customizing your layout in seconds and even enter and exit positions in one tap right from the chart. With up to 8 charts per layout, the future of trading is fast, powerful and precise. Experience it now on Robinhood Legend. Sign up today. Investing is risky. Robinhood Financial, LLC member SIPC is a registered broker dealer. Other fees may apply. Race the rudders.

[Charlie]

Race the sails. Race the sails. Captain, an unidentified ship is approaching. Over. Roger.

[Tarek Malik]

Wait. Is that an enterprise sales solution?

[Charlie]

Reach sales professionals, not professional sailors. With LinkedIn ads, you can target the right people by industry, job title and more. We'll even give you a $100 credit on your next campaign. Get started today at LinkedIn.com results, terms and conditions apply.

[Tarek Malik]

Great. All right. Okay. Now I'm ready. Now I'm ready. So, John, thank you for kind of setting the stage with your career there so that people are aware of your, I guess, your ever burning light for science there that led you to NASA. But your story really unfolded at the same time as Hubble because we just talked about earlier. You applied the same year that Hubble launched. You were, I think you were at Caltech in 1990 at that point in time, studying. When we spoke earlier this week, you said gamma ray and X ray astronomy. Right. As well.

[Charlie]

So I was studying black holes and neutron stars and in particular black holes and or neutron stars that are in a binary system. So there's a large massive star and next to it is a compact object, a black hole or a neutron star, and the black hole is sucking up the other star until something happens.

[Tarek Malik]

Oh, that stuff is great. That is great. So were you and other astronomers excited? Like, I mean, obviously now looking back, Hubble has become this icon of astronomy. But in 1990 when it launched, it had problems, but there was a lot of run up. Were you in the science community excited about that and then crestfallen or, or did you always expect it to be, I guess, the powerhouse that it's become?

[Charlie]

Well, to put that in perspective, you know, Lyman, Spitzer, I think was 1946 before we'd successfully launched and anybody had ever launched anything into orbit, predicted that and suggested that we should pursue a space telescope that would orbit the Earth to get above the atmosphere so that it could see more clearly so it could see ultraviolet light. And so the buildup from there through the dawn of the space age, the 1970s, when the large Space Telescope was seriously proposed and started being developed to the Hubble Space Telescope. The astronomical community was really excited about it. The first of the great observatories. Of course, there are lots of different types of astronomers. There are astronomers who use ground based facilities to look in optical and infrared. There are radio astronomers who use large dishes to look up at the sky. There were people like myself who were doing X ray astronomy and gamma ray astronomy. And Hubble was sort of taking all the attention to launch. And so there are a number of us, and myself included, that were I would use. We're humans most of the time, you know, unless we're Vulcan, you know, we were a little bit jealous of all the attention and the funding that was going to Hubble. Of course we had the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory, which is what I was using for my work, and the Chandra X Ray Observatory and the Spitzer Infrared Observatory, the other great observatories in process. But honestly, when I was selected as an astronaut, I was not a true Hubble hugger at that time. I appreciated its significance. And then of course, it launched in 1990. It was deployed today 35 years ago. And it almost wasn't successful. But then we found out about spherical aberration. And so I'll just say that 35 years ago today, the crew on Discovery, you know, were really sweating bullets because one of the solar arrays didn't deploy. In fact, Kathy Thornton and Bruce McCandless during deployment, were in their spacesuits in the airlock, ready to go if they need to manually crank out the solar arrays. But fortunately the ground was able to uplink a command to override and inhibit and they were able to roll out the solar arrays and deploy Hubble. So we don't have a lot of pictures of the Hubble deployment because all the people to take pictures were, you know, with the hatch closed. So. So that was one. Maybe the first Hubble save was on deployment day.

[Tarek Malik]

Wow. Wow.

[Rod Pyle]

So I, I had a list in here at one point, although I don't see it now, of how many hours you spent on EVA with Hubble over various flights. But it must have been between 25 and 30.

[Charlie]

So I did eight spacewalks between six and a half hours and eight hours and 40 minutes for a total of a little over 58 hours.

[Tarek Malik]

We should point out. We should point out, John, is the self described, you mentioned, you said it earlier, a Hubble hugger, you flew through three of the five. How many numbers am I holding up? Three of the five servicing flights there and including STS 125, which was my last, my, my, my first and I guess last, a Hubble servicing mission as a space reporter there. But no, no, what is it? No spring chicken to, to servicing the Hubble spacecraft. I think that's what Rod, you're, you were going to get at there.

[Rod Pyle]

Well, where I was going to go is John, I've written a lot about the, the early space program, Gemini through, through Apollo and so forth. And one story that always really intrigued me was the, the struggle to get EVA right. So you talk about those early to mid Gemini flights where they were just doing stand up EVAs and floating free a bit from the cockpit and then they started climbing out to the Agena, which was the attached spacecraft to the front of the Gemini that it docked with to retrieve experiments, and then finally going, just getting from the door of the hatch of the Gemini capsule to the back of the trunk there where they had a busy box thing took multiple missions and it really wasn't until Buzz Aldrin went up. He had trained one of the few to really train extensively in neutral buoyancy and water and made it work. But it's a great lesson and description of why it's not easy to do DVA EVAs. So even though there have been a couple of decades, by the time you came along to work on Hubble, I'd be interested in hearing how challenging it is because you train a lot in the neutral buoyancy tank, but then you get up there, it's a whole different environment. Now you're looking at the real thing. How challenging is that? What are some of those challenges?

[Charlie]

Well, first of all, I think the Gemini program is vastly underappreciated. When you look at going from a Mercury flight, sitting in a capsule, orbiting the Earth and entering, you know, sure. You know, that's world changing. But when we started Project Apollo, you know, we were planning to land on the moon and walk around in spacesuits and we didn't know how to do rendezvous, we didn't know how to do docking, we didn't know how to do spacewalks, we didn't know how long people could live in space, if they'd even survive trip to the moon and back. And Gemini proved all of those things in a very short period of time. So Gemini was really invented between Mercury and Apollo to prove those things out. And indeed, spacewalking proved to be one of the most difficult because you're in this pressurized suit. You're like the Michelin man. And it takes physical effort for the physicist out there, the integral of F DX just to move in the suit, to open and close your hands. Of course we did land on the moon, we walked on the moon. But the shuttle program is really where we refined the spacesuits so that they worked well and so that they could fit lots of different people. And especially the gloves. The Apollo astronauts complained about the gloves and we worked many generations of gloves for the space shuttle program. But a lot of it comes down to what you said. Training, training and more training. For the Hubble flights that I was on, we did three spacewalks the first mission, but we were training for a bigger mission that would do six in a row, six day after day. It was decided by management and probably correctly, that 5 was probably the max we should do. And so on my second and third Hubble missions, we had five spacewalks. So I did three on each mission. Roughly speaking, for every hour doing a spacewalk, we trained about 12 hours in the pool. But that doesn't include all the engineering work where we develop the procedures for the spacewalks or the tools or the techniques. It's probably more like 15, 20 hours for every hour in space. On top of that is the basic spacesuit training that we do in the pool, you know, for fixing the space shuttle in case that breaks. You know, I've done, you know, I can't remember how many spacewalk practicing to fix the space station and develop that because that was being co developed while I was flying the other missions. So much so that when I go out on a spacewalk in the shuttle spacesuit, I'm just really comfortable. I mean, it's just a very different experience than the Apollo astronauts. So much so that there were times where I sort of marveled, you know, it startled me that, you know, where I was working with sub miniature assembly connectors on an, on a radio frequency transmitter receiver. I thought, I feel like I'm in shirt sleeves. I'm so, you know, doing this. And it's so familiar that I forgot that I was in a spacesuit. Not quite, but I felt that way.

[Rod Pyle]

That's really amazing. I do have a follow up, but let's run to a quick break. We'll be right back. Standby.

[Tarek Malik]

It's true that some things change as we get older. But if you're a woman over 40 and you're dealing with insomnia, brain fog, moodiness and Weight gain. You don't have to accept it as just another part of aging. And with MITI health you can get help and stop pushing through it alone. The experts at MITI understand that all these symptoms can be connected to the hormonal changes that happen around menopause. And MITI can help you feel more like yourself again. Many healthcare providers aren't trained to treat or even recognize menopause symptoms. MIDI clinicians are menopause experts. They're dedicated to providing safe, effective, FDA approved solutions for dozens of hormonal symptoms, not just hot flashes. Most importantly, they're covered by insurance. 91% of MITI patients get relief from symptoms within just two months. You deserve to feel great. Book your virtual visit [e-mail] that's joinmidi.com.

[Rod Pyle]

As I understand it then besides the training and everything, the actual replacement bits for the hub, all the things you were upgrading and servicing were mostly modular. But I assume like so many things technological, that doesn't always work out quite as modular as you'd hope in terms of replacements and so forth.

[Charlie]

Yep. You know, the brilliance of Hubble is that it was designed to be, you know, serviceable, almost everything. And it was co developed with the shuttle, it was designed to be the, to fit completely in the payload bay. It was as big as it could be. If it were any bigger it would have been stuck. And as well it was designed with doors that open and close. You can kind of see it on the picture behind me. And the avionics and the scientific instruments were modular such that with some bolts you could unbolt them and take them out, connectors, put them back in. There were some things that they thought it'll never fail. But also just because of technology developments and learning how to operate the observatory, there were things we decided to do. This is the amazing community, the Goddard Space Flight center, the contractors, the scientists that we, that were never anticipated that we would do. So one example of something that they said would never break was the S band single access transmitter. And so this is something that's very important for talking to the comm satellites at geo. And one of them failed. If a second one failed, it would significantly impair the Hubble. So it was decided to go fix it. And this is just a little box about this big with all transistors and power transistors and radio frequency connections. And the antenna wires are coaxial lines with these little sub miniature assembly connectors. And it was screwed in with screws that you can't just put a wrench Straight on. And of course they were non captive so if you take them out they would float away. So we had to develop tools to get under the overhanging lip to get into where the screwdriver fits and a special tool to hold onto the screw after it comes out so it doesn't float away and get into the Hubble optics or somewhere. And then I had to train myself with my fingers to not over torque those little sub miniature assembly connectors. And then I had a tiny little torque wrench that was set at about 8 inch ounces to do the final torquing inch ounces.

[Rod Pyle]

I've never even heard of that.

[Charlie]

And the fun thing is that I would go to the local hardware store and buy tools and modify them in my home shop and go into the pool and we'd try them out. And then a month later Goddard would have made an official tool. And so we evolved those tools during training so that again I could, I could do that task. And one of my questions is because often when you screw something into Hubble, you put a little something like Loctite so that the screw won't back out during launch. And I said, you know, are those screws, you know, glued in or are they just tightened to a torque? And they went, tried to find the documentation. They said well we think it's just screwed in, you won't have to worry. And of course I got up there and I couldn't turn the screws. I ended up having to use both hands and turn a tiny little screwdriver because in fact they were glued in. But that's an example of one of the tasks that wasn't anticipated before launch. Other things. The Nick Moss cryo cooler, the Near Infrared Camera Multi Object Spectrograph had a cooling system failure. We went up in 2002 and installed a big radiator on the outside of the telescope. And Rick Linehan and I replumbed a cooling system into a hole in the bottom of the telescope and plugged it into the Nick Moss. So not only was I an RF technician, avionics technician on Hubble, I was a plumber. And then we also did a bunch of re electrical wiring of the solar arrays to the power units. And so we're electricians and then of course just mechanical engineers taking big instruments in and out. But there were a lot of repairs we did that were not anticipated. And in a way those were some of the most fun. And because they were challenging.

[Tarek Malik]

Well yeah, I did want to ask about just the whole concept of that. Of course these Spacewalks are integral to the repairs, to the upgrades for Hubble. But why even want to build that capability into an instrument like the Hubble Space Telescope in the first place? Because, you know, it was launched in 1990s, it was developed over the decade or so prior to that. That's all state of the art technology. Hey, that's great. The Voyager spacecraft are doing fine, relatively speaking, 40 plus years, you know, out, out in interstellar space. But why build that capability as both a scientist and an astronaut, from your view into this instrument in the first place, We've got James Webb. It doesn't have that capability and people seem to be happy with it.

[Charlie]

So a couple of things, one of which is that it was recognized before launch that the instruments that were available in the 1980s would quickly be overcome by new developments in astronomy. Astronomers, astrophysicists, scientists in general, to make measurements, to unravel the mysteries of the universe, are always pushing technology. And nowhere is that more true than in astrophysics for ground based observatories and space based observatories, where we push semiconductor research and detector research and electronics to get more performance to try and look further into the universe. Or in higher spectral resolution where you break the light up into its component colors and look for the signature of various physical phenomena. Or something like LIGO where we're measuring the distance between mirrors at a fraction of the diameter of a hydrogen atom in order to look for gravitational waves. In fact, that's one of the reasons why our country does this kind of breakthrough science, is that it pushes technology to force people to invent new things which then companies can take advantage of to improve the economy, our national defense, human health. In fact, the technology that we're using for this podcast, the video is based on first charge couple devices, silicon cameras, which when Hubble was launched were virtually non existent, and then now CMOS sensors, all of which were developed and pushed by astronomers and then became mass market items. There was no in a phone when Hubble was launched. And so the need to change instruments out on Hubble periodically was really the crucial thing because each time you bring up a new generation of scientific instruments, it's like having a brand new observatory. That's one of the great things. Hubble now, after 35 years because of the five servicing missions, has a complete set of scientific instruments which are for the most part state of the art still today.

[Tarek Malik]

Yeah, wow. I'm curious. That kind of leads us to our next question, which is just the science behind it all. You and I had a nice long interview earlier this week where you talked about like some of your picks. But you know, for the benefit of our listeners and viewers, here I am, I am curious if there's and I'll we'll have to go to a break first. But you know, I am curious that like if you have five or three key ones. But let's go to a break really quickly and then we'll come back because.

[Rod Pyle]

We want the whole answer. Yeah.

[John Grunsfeld]

25 years ago, a small group of business and government leaders met in Washington, DC. They envision the creation of an independent non profit organization with a mission to help people, businesses and government mitigate the growing threat of cyber attacks. Today, the center for Internet Security embodies that vision. For 25 years, it's worked with a global community of IT and cybersecurity experts to develop the CIS benchmarks and CIS critical security controls. These proven security best practices defend against common cyber threats and streamline compliance with industry frameworks, regulations and standards. Today, CIS provides cybersecurity services, threat intelligence and critical resources to help public and private sector organizations alike strengthen their Cyber defenses. Visit cisecurity.org today. That's the letters cisecurity.org to find out how CIS can help your organization as we create confidence in the connected world.

[Tarek Malik]

Missions to Mars, driverless cars, AI chatbots Feels like we're already living in the future. Well, Robinhood is built for the future of trading. Robinhood's intuitive design makes trading seamless. Spot opportunities and take control of your trades. With tools like screeners, simulated returns and strategy Builder on Robinhood traders have access to hundreds of popular stocks and ETFs 24 hours a day, five days a week so you can keep up with today's fast paced markets. You can now even trade stocks and crypto all in one place with the new desktop platform Robinhood Legend. The future of trading is fast, powerful and precise. Experience it now on Robinhood Investing is risky. Robinhood Financial LLC Member SIPC is a registered broker dealer. Trading during extended hours involves additional risks. Cryptocurrency services are offered through an account with Robinhood Crypto, LLC and mls.id 1702840 Robinhood Crypto is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the New York State Department of Financial Services.

[Charlie]

Does it ever feel like you're a marketing professional just speaking into the void? Well, with LinkedIn ads you can know you're reaching the right decision makers. You can even target buyers by job title, industry company seniority skills. Wait, did I say job title yet? Get started today and see how you can avoid the void and reach the right buyers with LinkedIn ads. We'll even give you a $100 credit on your next campaign. Get started at LinkedIn.com results. Terms and conditions apply.

[Tarek Malik]

Okay, I think we're ready now. So yeah, because we talked a lot about the spacewalk and that prowess, that engineering accomplishments of Hubble, but what about the science that it's allowed? Because the images are undeniable. Right? But there's much more to just the pretty pictures for Hubble, is that right?

[Charlie]

Yep. Oh, absolutely. So first of all, Hubble was designed originally for a 15 year lifetime. And in that 15 years with servicing its high level requirement was to measure the expansion of the universe in order to get an age estimate of how long our universe has been around since the Big Bang. And it was hoped that Hubble could see maybe halfway to the origin of the universe, six or seven billion years back in history. So keep in mind that the universe is very vast and light travels at a finite speed, the speed of light. And so it takes time for when light is emitted, say by a star in a distant galaxy to get to Earth. And so when we look with Hubble and do a big time expo, long time exposure, we're seen back into history, cosmic history. Hubble did that measurement. It measured the distance to distant galaxies. But because it's lived for 35 years, we've not only been able to to measure that age of the universe and the expansion of the universe back to half the age of the universe, which by the way, is about 13.8 billion years old, we've actually been able to see back to about 13.2 billion years with Hubble almost all the way back to the beginning of stars and galaxies themselves. Now, James Webb can go even further because of the cosmological redshift. Eventually Hubble could see further. But it's not an infrared telescope. And the light from back then is ultraviolet light emitted back then is now infrared light by the time it reaches us, just because the light waves get stretched out as the universe expands. So we measured the age of the universe very accurately. And one of the things that we didn't expect when Hubble was launched, because nobody thought of it as a possibility, well, maybe Einstein did. But as astronomers looked at these distant galaxies and measured the rate of expansion over cosmic time, instead of seeing something where the universe is slowing down is either expanding constantly at the same rate, or because of gravity pulling on everything, the universe could be expanding and slowing down. Adam Reese at Johns Hopkins University and Space Telescope Science Institute, you know, was making those measurements and in his notebook found that the universe looked like it was accelerating. And he had. He had like a question mark in there, like, ah, there must be something wrong with the measurement. And made more observations. And as the data came in, it became more and more certain that in fact, starting about 6 billion years ago or so, this expansion force, this mysterious dark energy force, started taking over and the universe has been accelerating. And of course, that led to Adam Reese, Brian Schmidt and Saul PERLMUTTER Winning the 2011 Nobel Prize in physics for that discovery. And I like it that, that Adam says, you know, no Hubble servicing, you know, no Nobel, because we put in the advanced camera for surveys in 2002 that allowed him to confirm that measurement.

[Tarek Malik]

Wow.

[Rod Pyle]

That's kind of the update of no bucks, no Buck Rogers, right?

[Charlie]

Yep.

[Rod Pyle]

And that reminds me, and. And just it's. I feel like I'm grossly oversimplifying things, but anybody who's been a NASA watcher for decades knows it's been a struggle to basically keep the sale going with the American public, which is a shame because it's not an expensive agency, as things go. And the returns are just so vast, even just raw financial returns. I'm sure you've seen the numbers. The Apollo program, for every dollar that went in, 16 to 26 came out. But Hubble kind of turned that on its head because regardless of how valuable the science has been, and it's been fantastic, the visuals have been breathtaking. As has been said over and over and over, mostly by NASA insiders, is the gift that keeps giving. So the messages that people involved with Hubble, like yourself, have been able to send the public are, look, this isn't just interesting and cool abstract science. It's beautiful in a way that connects you with the universe that nothing else can.

[Charlie]

Yep. Well, you know, absolutely. NASA is popular for good reason. First, I mean, from a practical point of view, you know, NASA scientists, engineers the missions that NASA does. NASA's a mission agency. You know, we perform these amazing missions. To do those missions, we have to invent new things. Now, I like to say that the mission of NASA in a way, is to innovate, to create new things, to go out and explore. And when we explore, we discover things. And when we discover things and communicate it to the public, we inspire a nation and a world. And Hubble is one of the best exemplars of that. When, if you go around the country and you see, you know, go to a national park, you know, There are people wearing, you know, NASA meatball shirts. And in fact, that's true around the world. That's aliens calling. I love.

[Tarek Malik]

I love that. That's the ringtone. That's awesome.

[Charlie]

But all around the world, you see NASA shirts. And as associate Administrator for science, I would travel around to different countries, you know, giving astronaut talks, giving science talks, meeting with scientists in those countries. And the US Ambassadors around the world say that NASA is the best ambassador of the US of any of the federal programs. I think that's pretty meaningful because as far as US Leadership, as far as US Greatness, NASA is really at the top of the list. NASA's popular on both sides of the aisle in Congress, partly because NASA is all across the nation. And when you ask Americans, do you like NASA? Almost universally people say, yes. And then when you dig in and you say, well, what do you like about NASA? As people start listing things that they know about, there's the original moon landing that's often mentioned, but then it's Hubble, it's Mars Curiosity, Mars Perseverance, the Ingenuity helicopter, James Webb Space Telescope missions out to the edge of the solar system. And it's not until 8 or 9 do people start talking about the human space flight program. And only about half of Americans know that we even have an international space station with US Astronauts on board. And so the science missions really do generate that wonder and awe and inspiration in the American people that make NASA so popular. Which makes me rather befuddled that the talk now is about slashing, really an epic slash in the science program at NASA and cuts to human spaceflight as well. You know, if it's about economic superiority, if you will invest in a NASA, as you say, currently the analysis shows that every dollar invested in NASA is about 7 to $9 in GDP. And so if you really wanted to enhance the economy, you would invest more in NASA, not less.

[Tarek Malik]

Yeah, we should point out that. Go ahead, Rick.

[Rod Pyle]

I just want to mention two things real quick. You know, as part of that public perception question, as I'm sure you've seen the same polls I have, they change from year to year, but generally, if you ask the average American citizen, hey, what percentage of the federal budget is NASA? They go, oh, gee, 10%, 20%. You're thinking we'd have condos on the rings of Saturn by now if that was the case. So I know that NASA's overall budget is roughly half of 1%. But what is the science budget in terms of the. Of the federal budget? It's tiny Right.

[Charlie]

It's tiny. You know, if you could make some big agency, say the Defense Department, if you went to the Pentagon and said, hey, we'd like you to be 1% more efficient, you know, that would pay for most of the science that the US Invests in, you know, across all agencies.

[Rod Pyle]

Well, so, so you touched on it. Let's. So thank you for grabbing that third rail for us. So, as listeners of the show know, the regular ones, the science budget at NASA has been, it's been proposed that it be cut by 50%. And a significant percentage of those are in astronomy, astrophysics, and of course, Earth science. You know, it's been, been represented as everything, depending on which organizations, press release, you're looking at as a criminal act to, you know, just extreme thinking. I think our, our, our view on the show is, look, we understand you may have to make some trims, but don't, not to this level. And certainly don't slash major programs like the Roman Space Telescope, which is already built, which is already to go. Yeah. And there in a similar situation. So I imagine you have some thoughts about this and I'd love to hear them.

[Charlie]

Well, I think it's nearly insane to cut the NASA science budget because one, Americans love NASA science and they're the taxpayers. They are paying taxes to get a return. But it's also more about the investment that the US Makes in science. You can reflect back on America basically winning World War II for peace in the world. Coming out of that, the US Put a study together led by Vannevar Bush, to say, how can we take advantage of the science, the engineering that we put into the tools that allowed us to win World War II, to take advantage of scientists and engineers working for the benefit of the US Economy, for human health, for national defense. And out of that came organizations like the National Science foundation, naca, and then NASA, darpa, and all of the effort that we put into and, and of course for human health, the Centers for Disease Control, and all of health and Human services research programs. That's why we lead the world in so many areas in astrophysics and in fact, in almost all areas of space science, the US has complete dominance working with other countries, working with the European Space Agency, working with the Japanese Space Agency, Canadian Space Agency scientists around the world. But we lead the world in space science and in particular in astrophysics. And these cuts will basically, we're just handing the leadership over to other countries and specifically China, which has been working very hard to build their space science program up, and specifically astrophysics. They are working on something like a Hubble, a servicing observatory to be near their space station. And so it just seems crazy now, specifically, you know, Hubble, James Webb Roman and the next great observatory, Habitable Worlds Observatory. You know, these are really important programs for leadership in the US but also because when astronomers push the boundaries, as we are with these telescopes, it's a great benefit to national defense. We're not the only ones who use telescopes, as you can imagine in the example of the Roman Space Telescope. I was associate administrator when Department of Defense approached us and said, hey, we have a surplus optical system. Do you think this could be valuable to NASA? I looked at the details and said, oh, absolutely, if you're not going to fly it, we have a mission that can take advantage of this. And so as far as government efficiency, there's nothing more efficient than reuse of something that taxpayers have already invested in. And that's how we took the W first, the Wide Field Infrared Space Telescope concept that was recommended by the National Academy of Sciences Astrophysics Decadal. We took that concept, married it with this optics and now we have almost ready to go, almost ready to go to the launch pad, a complete observatory with instruments and with a particular instrument called a coronagraph. That's a technology pathfinder that can image planets around nearby stars to look for if there's life in the universe beyond Earth. Is there another Earth out there? And the idea that we'll just willy nilly cancel that for reasons that are not clear really to me seems somewhat insane. Now to be fair, the reports and all of my knowledge come from public domain sources. This is a proposal by Office of Management and Budget to NASA for slashing and burning NASA. Hopefully Janet Petro and the leadership at NASA can push back on that so that the final budget that the President announces will have broader support for NASA. Not throwing it down the toilet the way it seems like they're thinking.

[Tarek Malik]

This sounds like a. I want to.

[Rod Pyle]

Stand up and cheer here.

[Charlie]

Well, but also there's two things I'd like to add to that, One of which is we do have a U.S. constitution. And if you'll bear with me a second, maybe, maybe after the break I keep one on my desk is eluding me at the moment, but yes. Oh, of course, because it's sitting out. I wish I could remember who gave this to me, but a congressman gave this to me and I carry it around with me. It's been to Antarctica as a matter of fact. But the Constitution says that the Congress has the power of the purse, the President's budget request is exactly that. It's a proposal. It's a request for Congress to consider it widely in Congress. NASA's appreciated. However, this is a weird time. So it's not clear what will happen, but Congress could rescue us. Unfortunately, the Office of Management and Budget, as I Learned in my 5 years at NASA headquarters, they have a lot of authority to direct agencies, independent agencies like NASA, to start making severe cuts even before Congress enacts a budget. When you're in a continuing resolution, which seems like we're always in a continuing resolution. And so a lot of the cuts are happening now. People are being offered buyouts, people are being laid off in a reduction in force, and Hubble and James Webb are not being spared. My understanding is that NASA's been directed already to start turning off instruments and laying off the engineers and scientists who support Hubble in order to save a few tens of millions of dollars. And that's just crazy.

[Tarek Malik]

Yeah. For our listeners who may not have seen, when I was at the American Astronomical Society meeting, that's where during the town halls, we were told that it was a blanket 20% cuts for Hubble, for James Webb, for a lot of other programs, just to be ready to have a plan for that kind of thing. And it's a good time, Rod. We should remind people that, as John reminded us, with Congress having the power of the purse, people put them there. Right. And if, If NASA science matters to you, you can call your congressman and tell them that so that they hear from you, hopefully every day. You know, maybe call them every day.

[Charlie]

In fact, I would say it's. It's. I would say it's a civic, Civic obligation. You must call your congressman, write your congressman and tell them what you think, whether you're in favor of, you know, the US being leaders of the world in great science or not. Hopefully, you're in favor of that. You're watching this podcast. But if they don't hear from you, they don't know, and they make decisions based on what their constituents, people like you tell them is important. And I think NASA science, and NASA in general, is one of the best things that the United States does with taxpayer funds.

[Rod Pyle]

And it's a gift that we've been giving to the world since the beginning of the agency, which is something that I think is underappreciated, which is one of the reasons why we send a copy of every quarterly publication of Ad Aster magazine, which I edit, to all the members of Congress at significant expense to make sure that they, at Least give it to their aides to read during their bathroom breaks because these things are important and like John says, if you don't call, they don't know and they need to know. Sorry, Tarek, I jumped, jumped in front of you there.

[Tarek Malik]

No, Well, I thought because this seemed like a really good time to start talking about the future as well. John, you mentioned successors to Hubble. We talked a bit about the Roman Space Telescope, but you mentioned the Habitable Worlds Observatory, which you actually presented a study at AAS about having robotic service servicing capabilities for that mission. And I'm curious what the future of, of of space based servicing telescopes looks like to you. And then maybe how much, maybe more time we'll get out of the Hubble Space Telescope as well.

[Charlie]

Sure. Well, let's rewind the movie a little bit to 2004. In 2003, we had the tragic loss of space shuttle Columbia. And as a result, the NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe made the decision that we would not go back to Hubble. And it was based on an overall risk assessment that if a shuttle got stranded at Hubble, you couldn't hang out for Hubble for six months the way you can on the space station. And as Sonny Williams and Butch Wilmore discovered even longer, that we wouldn't do that mission. At the time I was NASA chief scientist and so I came up with the idea of well, what about a robotic servicing of Hubble? And we actually showed that you could do not the complex things that we had done on Hubble with the space shuttle and spacewalks, but you could remove a big instrument like the wide field camera 2 and put in a new Wide Field Camera using a simple robot. Now once we had return to flight figured out and a few other things, my administrator Mike Griffin decided we would go back to Hubble, that if we're going to fly the space shuttle, we should do really important things with it. And Hubble servicing was one of those. And you know, I was glad because he asked me to go back. So in 2009 we did a really major upgrade and repair mission on STS125 such that Hubble is still operating today, 16 years later. And in fact the prediction is that Hubble, absent any major failure, you never know, should be able to continue to do state of the art forefront science for another 10 years, which would be amazing. Now by that time Hubble will be 45 years old. And so NASA is starting work already concept studies for a super Hubble. And this will be the first observatory that's ever Been conceived of and built specifically to look out into the cosmos. Actually to look at nearby stars, to image solar systems, to look for rocky planets that have signs of life. There'll be sun like stars and hopefully we can find a rocky planet in the habitable zone and then study that to see if we see any signs of life on it. The current thinking is it will be about a 6 meter mirror. Hubble's is 2.4 meters. And it will go to the same orbit as James Webb, a million miles from Earth, to get away from all the disturbances around the Earth. But that makes it harder to service. And why would we want to service it? Same reason as Hubble. The instruments that we'll launch with will be state of the art at launch, but five years after that they won't be quite as capable as what we could build. And this trick of blocking out the starlight from a sun like star and seeing planets around it is really, really hard. And so we're going to be able to get better at that over time. The Roman Space Telescope will give us a lot of information about the performance of a coronagraph in space. That's the special instrument. The first generation Habitable worlds observatory, as it's called, will give us more information. But it's probably going to be the second generation coronagraph that will really find us those Earths and the ability to see if there's life there. To do that, you'll have to swap them out. A million miles from Earth is not a great place to send humans. But by 2045, say, we should have very capable servicing robots that we can hire as a commercial service to deliver the instrument, swap them out, and then send the observatory back on its way. That's what we're thinking. My mantra for this effort is make it so easy even a robot can do it.

[Tarek Malik]

That's fantastic.

[Rod Pyle]

As usual, we still have questions left, but we're running out of time. So I hope we can have you back at some point. That would be a delight. But I want to thank you very much, John, for coming on today for episode 158 where we got to talk about all kinds of cool stuff, but especially one of our perennial favorites, the Hubble Space Telescope. So for our listeners, viewers, you can keep up with the latest on Hubble and other things at stsci.edu, which is the Space Telescope Science Institute. John, is there someplace we can keep track of you and your climbing adventures and so forth online?

[Charlie]

I don't have a website, but I do want to say if you go to science.NASA.gov missions. That's another great place to go. That's kind of the current Hubble Central, as NASA has been directed to consolidate all of its websites. So again, that's science.NASA.gov missions Hubble, or if you go to science.NASA.gov, you'll see all of the missions, which is a good thing to do. And I'd be remiss if I didn't say one more time, you know, write your Congress folks, write your House of Representatives representative, write the Senate, and you can go to whitehouse.gov and every American citizen can give President Trump their input.

[Rod Pyle]

You beat me to the punch. I was going to say all together now. Write your representative. All right, Tarek, where can we find you writing your representative these days?

[Tarek Malik]

Well, you can find [e-mail] as always. And on what is it on the X, I guess at Tarek, J. Malik and Blue sky as well. That's me. And I guess this weekend we'll be at the Pinewood Derby, hoping that we have the most aerodynamic car. We'll see how my daughter fares in her Girl Scout meet. And having some cake because I'm 48 today and so that's really exciting.

[Charlie]

Well, I hope you did the computational fluid dynamics to demonstrate the aerodynamics of the car.

[Rod Pyle]

Way to put him in his place.

[Charlie]

Yeah, which by the way, that computational fluid dynamics, you know, a lot of the state of the art stuff was developed by NASA. Remember, the first day is aeronautics.

[Rod Pyle]

Boy, and that would be a merit badge and a half, wouldn't it?

[Tarek Malik]

I tell you, I tell you.

[Rod Pyle]

Of course, you can find me at pylebooks.com or at astromagazine.com or nss.org and various other places. Now remember, you can always drop us a line at Twist Twit tv. We do welcome your comments, suggestions and ideas, especially if you're saying it nicely. And we, we will answer each and every letter new episodes of the podcast publish every Friday. And your favorite podcatcher. So make sure to subscribe, like tell your friends and give us reviews. And hats off to John. Five stars will take whatever you got. Don't forget, we are counting on you to join Club Twit, which has reinstated annual memberships because, well, because it's just the right thing to do. And it keeps us on the air, which is something that makes us happy and bringing you horrid space jokes and great guests. $7 a month. You can't beat it. For $7 a month, you can also follow the Twittech podcast network on Twitter and a Facebook @Twit TV on Instagram. John, thank you very much for joining us today. It has been an absolute pleasure and I hope we get to talk to you again.

[Charlie]

My pleasure and may you live long and prosper.

[Rod Pyle]

Yes, for quick tech insights, dive into.

[Tarek Malik]

Twitch short form lineup From Hands On.

[Rod Pyle]

Mac, you can get helpful tips, great.

[Tarek Malik]

Apps and awesome accessories for your Mac, iPad and iPhone. Hands On Windows offers essential advice and.

[Rod Pyle]

Everything new in Windows.

[Tarek Malik]

Hands On Tech zooms in on a.

[Rod Pyle]

Specific theme with easy to follow advice that turns tech troubles into triumphs. Home Theater Geeks with Scott Wilkinson supercharges all things home entertainment. And if you like watching the shows, join Club Twit and you'll get full.

[Tarek Malik]

Video access too, plus ad free versions and more.

[Charlie]

Get informed fast with all of TWiT TV's short form shows.

[Rod Pyle]

Download and subscribe today on your favorite podcast player. Discover the life changing benefits of Meow Greens for your cat Ever see your cat slowing down or having health issues and wonder what can I do to make them better? Well, my friend, add Meow Greens to your cat's food for 90 days and I guarantee you'll see changes that will amaze you. Greetings. I'm naturopathic doctor Dennis Black, inventor of Meow Greens and I invite you to take the Meow Greens 90 day challenge. In the first 30 days, you'll see shinier coats and increased energy. By day 60, your cat will have a stronger immune system, less shedding, improved joint function, all due to the live nutrients that you've added to their diet. And at 90 days they're going to have better digestion, reduced inflammation, improved heart health, and you may even have reduced their cancer risk. Fetch a free Jumpstart trial bag for your cat today. Go to try Meow Greens.com use promo code try Meow. That's try Meow. You just cover the shipping. You don't have to change your cat's food to improve your cat's health. Just add a packet of Meow Greens.