Artemis II Back on the Pad!
Loading summary
Tarik Malik
Coming up on this Week in Space, Jeff Bezos Blue Origin wants to protect Earth from asteroids. It looks like Rocket Lab is getting some boku bucks for some super fast missile tests for the US military. And what is the deal with Artemis 2? The rocket's back on the pad. Is it going to fly? Mike Wall of Space.com joins Rod and I to figure it out. Tune in.
Sponsor/Ad Voice
This episode is brought to you by outSystems, a leading AI development platform for the enterprise. Organizations all over the world are creating custom apps and and AI agents on the Outsystems platform. And with good reason. Build, run and govern apps and agents on one unified platform. Innovate at the speed of AI without compromising quality or control. Outsystems is trusted by thousands of enterprises worldwide for mission critical apps. Teams of any size and technical depth can use Outsystems to build, deploy and manage AI apps and agents quickly and effectively without compromising reliability and security. Without systems, you can accelerate ideas from concept to completion. It's the leading AI development platform that is unified, agile and enterprise proven, allowing you to build your agentic future with AI solutions deeply integrated into your architecture. Outsystems Build your agentic future. Learn more@outsystems.com TWiT that's OutSystems. That.com TWiT podcasts you love from people you trust. This is Twit.
Rod Pyle
This is this Week in space, episode number 202, recorded on March 20, 2026. Artemis Eminent. Hello and welcome to another episode of this Week in Space, our Artemis imminent edition, episode number 202. And I'm gonna give numbers now every week because I'm so proud we made it past 200 because John, what is it? The average podcast, last five episodes or something? It's not much.
Mike Wall
I think it's like maybe 20 is the average 20.
Tarik Malik
We've done 10 times that many. Take that, Internet.
Rod Pyle
I am Rod Pyle, editor chief, Badass magazine. And I know I'm not going to say what I worked on when I was in my television career, you snotty men. And I'm with Tarik Malik of Space. Hello, Ron. Hello.
Tarik Malik
How are you doing? How are you doing? How are things?
Rod Pyle
Oh, he has groupies.
Tarik Malik
I know, know, I know. So by the way, by the way, before we get started, Eid Nabarak to everybody out there, it's Eid. As we're recording this, very excited end of Ramadan. Happy new renewal for the next year.
Rod Pyle
So I don't have any religious thing to hang on today, so I'LL just have to. Have to roll with it at speaking. Rolling. We will be back in a few moments after we do our headlines with Mike Wall of Space.com. because when we want to do a deep dive at Artemis or anything else. Space Today or anything else breaking, really, we call Mike because he's smart and he's our. He's our crutch guy and he's of Taurus. Taurus.
Tarik Malik
Smart, smart guy.
Rod Pyle
Smart lead writer, among many other things, because he is the space flight and tech editor for Space.com. yeah, there, I got it right this time.
Tarik Malik
Yeah.
Rod Pyle
No, that's not what's online. Before we start, of course, we would ask you to do us a solid. Make sure to like our show, podcast, YouTube video, whichever you're watching, subscribe, give us reviews, and support this podcast with all your might, because it means the world and beyond to us. And speaking of beyond, I have a fresh space joke joke from Tom Monahan.
Tarik Malik
Tom, let's hear it.
Mike Wall
Okay.
Rod Pyle
We need you to pay attention. Okay.
Tarik Malik
Wait, is it a long one?
Rod Pyle
It's a baseball joke.
Tarik Malik
Okay. Okay.
Rod Pyle
Yeah, it's not long, but it. It took me a couple of passes.
Tarik Malik
Who's on first? Right?
Rod Pyle
Because I'm not a sports guy. Okay. What did the Astros manager say to the batter when he was going up to the plate? Bottom of the ninth with two out and two men on base and down by two runs.
Tarik Malik
Okay. Okay, what?
Rod Pyle
All right, guys, we need a moonshot to win the game. If you are to miss, then it's 1, 2, 3, you're out.
Tarik Malik
Oh, it's so painful because it's. It's. It's so close to home.
Rod Pyle
He didn't have. He didn't have the hyphens in it the way I wrote it. So I read it properly. So I had to write it back when he said it in and say, I hate to be thick, but I don't get it. But I'm also, like, pay about as much attention to sports as I do to quantum physics. So, yeah, I kind of missed that. But then once I got it, I thought, oh, that's good. So we got to use that.
Tarik Malik
So thank you, Artemis. You got one through three, and then you're done. And it's a zinger. It comes in at the end, and then you just.
Rod Pyle
It is a pretty layered routine, isn't it?
Tarik Malik
Yeah, that's good.
Rod Pyle
Now, I found that some folks want to send us to the penalty box when it's joke time, this show, but you have the power to help by sending us Your best, worst or most indifferent space joke. We'll take anything really twistwit TV and then we can blame it on you when we're on the air. Speaking of which, let's go to.
Tarik Malik
Wait, there's no head. There's no penalty box in baseball it's the bench. You get benched.
Rod Pyle
There's no crying in baseball. Let's go to headline News.
Tarik Malik
Headline news.
Rod Pyle
That poor woman can't get the words out. That being stepped on by you. So tell me about Amazon's asteroid hunter.
Tarik Malik
Yeah, yeah.
Rod Pyle
Well this is really cool.
Tarik Malik
Well this is fun. This is fun. And yeah, we found out that Blue Origin this week is teaming up with NASA on what they call the near Earth object hunter mission. Neo. Is that how you would, what's the anagram for NEO Hunter? I guess not neo, but they're gonna use this, their blue ring. They have this spacecraft bus that they've been developing kind of like a, like
Rod Pyle
a one size standardized. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Tarik Malik
Propulsion that they would use for new Glenn and then you could put your spacecraft on top of it. And now they want to build an asteroid hunting spacecraft to protect Earth from dangerous interlopers. Which is very nice of Jeff Bezos that he wants to protect all of us on the planet by finding from asteroids so that we can consume more of Amazon prime and stuff on the Internet. But, but, but there' starting. It's going to be a pretty big thing. I mean it's, it's this, this bus can, can build up, it can carry up to like 8, 800 pounds. So that's like 4 tons if they want to build like a really beefy, beefy spacecraft. And, and it seems like they're going to release a bunch of cubesats. So it's not one like giant bus. It's going to be a bunch of these little ones that will go and do things.
Rod Pyle
So it's one bus with a bunch of different attachments, you mean? Right?
Tarik Malik
Yeah, yeah, like with, with a bunch of different cubesats and it'll have like two different mission phases. So it'll, it'll, it'll, it'll release some of those and, and then the, the, it'll be able to, it says here the spacecraft will be capable of shooting a ray of charged particles onto an asteroid to change death ray. Yeah. So they're gonna like pew pew, pew it, you know, and, and so they, it'll, it's, it's kind of like a mothership that's gonna carry these cubesats out there, do some recon and then zap, zap, zap it all. So it's.
Rod Pyle
Well, so really Sorry, let's really, let's be specific. So when you zap the asteroid, presumably that causes a reaction on the surface of the asteroid which then causes a boost and eventually over time would cause it to change its trajectory, which is the whole point.
Tarik Malik
Yeah, very, very.
Rod Pyle
And they also.
Tarik Malik
Right.
Rod Pyle
And they're also going to have a kinetic impactor like DART involved. So these are various things short of nuclear bombs aimed at. If you detect an asteroid on a collision course with Earth or at high risk of it anyway, if you get it early enough, you just have to go over and go blow on it a couple of times to make it move out of the way because of geometry. But if it's much closer, then you got to find something bigger and nastier to divert it.
Tarik Malik
Yeah. And so it uses this ion beam to do that, to do that initial one. But can I talk about the second phase of the mission? Rod, real quick?
Rod Pyle
It's your nickel, man.
Tarik Malik
Yeah. So if the asteroid is too big, so like Rod said, it has to be like a certain size for this ion beam to either cook off or whatever, have the little limited reaction impact over time to deflect the asteroid. But if it's too big for that, then it will enter the robust kinetic disruption phase of the mission, which is they're going to just crash the thing into the asteroid like the DART mission itself. We know what we've seen. And in fact, this week there was a new study that the DART mission, which NASA launched to asteroids, did a moon Dimorphous and crashed a probe into Dimorphous to see how it could affect its orbit around its parent. That worked so well that it's changed both of the spacecraft's orbits around the sun so they know that it works. And so this is like another phase of the mission. So if the ion beam to cook the asteroid to change the trigger doesn't work, they can crash it into it. And it's really exciting, you know, to have this kind of an emission going out there. So it's not just looking for stuff, but it's just going to go out there and smack it all around in the solar system. So.
Rod Pyle
So I'll get on to whichever other headlines you want to do, but I did want to mention something that I don't have on the notes here. I was doing a radio hit the other day and we were talking about, I forget the name of the company, Sunray, Solar ray, something like that. So there's this company that wants to launch enormous unfolding reflective satellites to reflect sunlight down the earth. And as they claim, this would be for polar orbits, I guess, as you claim, as they claim it would light construction sites or battle zones or crops or this and that. And basically they're big sun guns. So you have a big mirror in orbit that you'd be able to redirect at a customer request, which you of course pay handsomely for. And we've seen this before. The Germans were planning this in the 1930s.
Tarik Malik
Yeah.
Rod Pyle
And it was the same thing. They said, yeah, we can, we can light harbors with it, we can make cities safer. And oh, by the way, we can also use it as a death ray to burn down New York.
Tarik Malik
Yeah.
Rod Pyle
Which is why they called the sun gun. So we have a new sun gun coming. If this company goes, they don't have much money. I think they got, I don't know, 20 million or something which they're gonna
Tarik Malik
need more than that started.
Rod Pyle
Oh yes, because we're talking, you know, to really be effective these things would have to be from many, many hundreds of feet to 2000s square feet.
Tarik Malik
Yeah, we should read Ben Bova's power set that they, they, they turn a solar satellite into a sun gun, as you call it.
Rod Pyle
Death ray. Death ray.
Tarik Malik
Also that's the plot of, of Die Another Day. That's what the, the evil baddie in that James Bond movie does.
Rod Pyle
So stupid. Those movies got so awful. Okay, pick a story.
Tarik Malik
All right, well, let's just do Rocket Lab then.
Mike Wall
Let's just do.
Tarik Malik
Okay, so yeah, but this, this was, this is another one actually. Mike found this story, our guest later. But Rocket Lab has secured a 190 million dollar launch deal from the US government, from the military, basically for, get this, not one, not two, but 220 hypersonic rocket launches using their Haste rocket system. Their Haste Rocket launches are essentially just the electron rocket, their primary workhorse rocket that they launch on a suborbital trajectory to reach hypersonic speeds to test what I assume, because they're not going to say are hypersonic missiles, that not NASA, that the Defense Department has been trying to develop over time. We know that Russia has built one and allegedly has used some of them against Ukraine. We know that China is developing one and may have actually tested them as well. And so the US does, you know, has said that they feel that the, the military is a bit behind in that race for hypersonic weapons. And so this is what we've been seeing. I think they've, they've launched I think four, if memory serves, or seven of these. These haste launches so far for the US Military. And now this is like a batch buy. And I just want to point out that's 20 launches for $190 million. That's less than a million dollars a launch, Rod. Less than a million dollars a launch that the military is getting this at. And that should say something about what Rocket lab can do at scale and at least for the cost of their emissions overall.
Rod Pyle
So if we sell your house, we could probably launch some part of both of us in this space.
Tarik Malik
Well, I think we'd have to sell your house too. I don't think that works. We might get like a third of the rocket stages.
Rod Pyle
Oh, my God, it is. So anyway, I won't go into it, but we live in a condo which is not of the highest caliber of construction. I would say, you know, it's nice enough, but it's, it's climbing up towards a million dollars because Los Angeles.
Tarik Malik
Yeah, it's crazy.
Rod Pyle
Why don't you give us just a quick blast on spring equinox, since you love.
Tarik Malik
Oh, yeah. Well, spring is in the air at last. And so the.
Rod Pyle
I feel like singing.
Tarik Malik
I know the equinox is coming and the only reason I added this is because I'm just so tired here in New Jersey of how cold it's been with the Freez freezing, the freezing weather. And we had like this like nearly 2ft of snow so far. But March 21st and March 20th, so that's like today and tomorrow this weekend as we're recording, we're going to get hit by some geomagnetic storms from the sun, A series of solar eruptions and fast solar wind streams are going to hit us just in time for the switch over into spring on the 21st. On the 20th. That's today. Today is the equinox. Huzzah. Right? It's. It's spring. Sorry, everybody. In the southern hemisphere where it turns to fall. I know that you got winter coming, but at least now my daffodils can be safe. And maybe we'll get some, some northern lights as well. Visible across like 18 different states. It's going to be great.
Rod Pyle
Wow. Okay. That is very cool. And speaking of cool, we will soon have the ultra cool mike wall with us. So stand by, hold on to your seats, don't pull the ejection handle. We'll be right back.
Sponsor/Ad Voice
On December, Disney invites you to go behind the scenes with Taylor Swift in an exclusive six episode docu series.
Tarik Malik
I wanted to give something to the
Mike Wall
fans that they didn't expect.
Tarik Malik
The only thing left is to close
Sponsor/Ad Voice
the book the end of an era and don't miss Taylor Swift. The Eras Tour the final show featuring for the first time the tortured poets
Mike Wall
department,
Sponsor/Ad Voice
streaming December 12th only on Disney. Are you stuck staring at your W2? Are tax refund worries holding you back? You probably have FOMO the fear of messing up the fix using TurboTax on Intuit credit Karma. They find every credit and deduction to help you get every refund dollar you deserve or your money back. It's time to overcome your fear of messing up and get your taxes done right. Start filing today in the Credit Karma app.
Tarik Malik
Want to see your brand on tv? Roku Ads Manager makes it easy to launch targeted ad campaigns in minutes, track results in real time, and drive on screen purchases with just a click of the Roku remote. Get a $500 match on your first $500 spent with code ROKU500@ads.roku.com that's code R O K U 500@ads.roku.com Terms apply.
Rod Pyle
And we are back with Mike Wall, who is widely known as the space flight and tech editor at Space.com, the original old space dog senior news reporter. How's that?
Tarik Malik
Yeah, that's good. That's great. That's great. He's.
Rod Pyle
He's the man. He's the dude. He's the boss. He's. He's our space man. Hi, Mike.
Mike Wall
Hey, boss. I'm not so sure Tark's.
Tarik Malik
Yeah, I wasn't gonna say anything. So. Thanks, Mike, for the conversations I have
Rod Pyle
with Tarek every, every midweek. I don't think you want to be the boss, but yeah, thank you for coming back. We're going to talk about Artemis today because it's the topic du jour. But first, I believe Tarek has a question.
Tarik Malik
Oh, yeah. You know, Mike, you know, I think you answered this the first time, but we try to reintroduce everybody to our new guests who have stumbled across us in the Internet and taken a chance at this Week in Space to find out what happened this Week in space. I guess could you just remind everybody kind of who you are and then what you do and how you got to space and everything?
Mike Wall
Yeah, sure. I've been here for, since 2010 in various roles and yeah, I've been reporting on space flight and astronomy and the search for life and stuff over the course of that decade and a half. And yeah, now I'm in charge of sort of the spaceflight and tech stories that we report on and research and post and. Yeah, so I've been in that role for a little while, but before that I was more of a writer and just kind of. Yeah, but yeah, I mean, I've been here for a long time, so I've seen the space industry change and I've seen the science change as we've learned more about exoplanets and about Mars and all that. It's just like a lot's happened since the time I started reporting on this stuff in 2010.
Tarik Malik
And you've written a book. You have a doctorate in lizards, if I understand that right.
Mike Wall
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Like, I was a biologist for a number of years before I decided to go into writing. And yeah, like, I specialized in, in like lizards and snakes because they're really fun. And I grew up in Arizona and I used to go out and into the desert and catch them and it was really fun to do. So I have still have a lifelong fascination with those sorts of critters. So. Yeah.
Rod Pyle
So, Tarek, can you imagine being that. That you and I bombed out of the sciences halfway through our bachelor's degree, finishing a doctorate and then deciding, oh, that was kind of fun, but I think I'll just restart and do something completely different.
Tarik Malik
I'll do space.
Rod Pyle
That takes a certain kind of moxie,
Tarik Malik
you know, I think you were at. Mike was at one of the national labs doing writing there too. I mean, that's not.
Mike Wall
Yeah, yeah, I was at. Yet I was at like, Idaho National Laboratory. I got a scholarship from them to do a grad writing program at UC Santa Cruz. So part of the deal for that scholarship was I would, I would intern for them for a spell. So. So yeah, so I did that. And they're, they're like the nation's premier sort of like nuclear energy research lab. So, yeah, so I, I went up there and did that and learned a lot about that, which I knew almost nothing about before. So that also was fun.
Rod Pyle
So not, not to overcook this topic, but I think what I'm hearing you saying is you finished your doctorate, you went and did some work in that, got interested in writing, and then went back to grad school.
Mike Wall
Yeah, but it was, it was only a grad writing certificate at UC Santa Cruz. So it was, it was only one year. It was not like multiple years.
Tarik Malik
So what? A grad writing certificate? This changes everything. And I'm go have to. Mike, I'm sorry.
Mike Wall
No, I can leave it.
Rod Pyle
You know, but don't, don't get too carried away, Tarek, because if you ever spent time at UC Santa Cruz, there is no way you could walk from one campus building to another without becoming stoned just by the, the ambience. All right, well, I think we've exercised that one to its fruitful end. So suffice to say, Mike's a very impressive guy and smarter than Tarik and myself put together. So what's going on with Artemis? They rolled back to the ped, is that correct?
Mike Wall
Yeah, they rolled back to the pad today, Friday, March 20, and it's the second trip to the launch pad for the Artemis II rocket. And hopefully it'll stay there this time and they won't find any other problems with it like they did the first time it was on the pad. And if everything goes well, then it could actually launch just a couple weeks from now.
Rod Pyle
Well, and that's always the question mark, isn't it? Which window? So what are the, the windows they have up now for possible launch dates?
Mike Wall
They have said they are aiming for the earliest possible window in April, which runs from April 1st to April 6th. So theoretically that means they're still targeting April 1st for the launch of Artemis 2. And then if they can't get off the ground in that kind of six day span, then there's another window that opens on April 30th. So they would have to stand down for the rest of the month if they can't get off the ground in the first week of April.
Tarik Malik
So that kind of means, Mike, that we're like right now as we're talking, we're about just under two weeks, right? Two weeks away from launch. And why are we back at the pad again though? Weren't we at the pad already like 2 months ago and ready to go? So what happened for folks who maybe weren't following it?
Mike Wall
So they first went out to the pad on January 17th and they did that to kind of start the pre launch campaign on the pad to make sure that the rocket is in good shape and everything is working with the Orion crew capsule and the ground systems that support them at the launch pad. And part of that was doing what's like this two week or this, this sort of two day long test called a wet dress rehearsal, which is basically like a countdown simulation that goes through all the activities in the last two days leading up to launch. And the kind of, the kind of centerpiece of that is the fueling test where they load the moon rocket with all of the propellant that it would use on launch day. So that's like 700,000 gallons of super cold liquid hydrogen and like liquid oxygen. And so they, they did that at first and had like a little, they like, they got through most of the wet dress rehearsal on the first try but then had a leak of liquid hydrogen so they stood down a little bit, but then they did a little tweak on the pad and they actually fixed it and got, got through a successful wet dress rehearsal with all the fueling and there were no big leaks. And so it seemed like it was on track to launch potentially as early as like March 6, which is what they were going. But then just after that successful fueling test, so on February 20th I believe it was, they noticed another problem with the Space Launch System rocket. There was a flow of helium issue in the upper stage of the rocket and it was interrupted by some weird thing they didn't understand and they couldn't fix on the pad. So that's why they rolled back off the pad. They rolled off the pad in late February, went back to the vehicle assembly building at Kennedy Space center which is four miles away from the launch pad and is where they do all the work on the rocket. And that's where it had been until like the rollout today.
Rod Pyle
So that, that issue was actually a blockage if I understand correctly, in one of the check valve bodies, right? Something.
Mike Wall
Yeah, there was an issue with one of the seals in the, in the upper stage and they, they went in and they, they figured it out and like replaced it and they, they say it should be on target and everything should work and we, we shall see. They, they also, what's like, what's interesting is that they have said that they're not going to do another wet dress rehearsal now that it's back at the, the pad because they, they, they got through all of those milestones back in February. So it's at the pad now and we don't have to wait to see if it passes the fueling test, if there are any more leaks or anything like that. But there are other checks that they're going through and it's possible something else could pop up like that helium issue that, that they found after the fueling test. So we just, it'll be. Yeah, we'll just have to wait and see what, what they, yeah, what they determine on the pad. Because a giant, a 320 foot tall rocket is a really complicated piece of machinery and if any single thing is wrong then they'll have to deal with it. And it's not a simple thing to deal with a problem with a giant rocket like that. So, yeah, we'll just wait and see.
Tarik Malik
I think Lori Glaze said that if they're going to fuel the rocket up the next time and if it's fine, she just wants it to go.
Mike Wall
Yeah, yeah, yeah, well, and that's, that's the thing too, you know, this is the, it's the second Artemis mission, but it's the first one with astronauts on board. So you would have to assume that they're going to be extra careful with this because there are four people riding on the rock at this time. When, when it's. When the first Space Launch System rocket launched back in November 22, there was nobody on board. It sent like an uncrewed Orion to lunar orbit and back, and it was successful, but there was nobody on board. So the stakes weren't quite as high. Now there'll be four people on the top of that rocket. So they're going to make sure every box is checked, every T is crossed, and so on, because you can't take human lives lightly, obviously.
Tarik Malik
Yeah.
Rod Pyle
You're up next.
Tarik Malik
I thought, I thought you were gonna go to your pool. Did you not want to go to your pool?
Rod Pyle
Oh, well, I think we should. Yeah, we should.
Tarik Malik
Well, before that, I just, I just, I was Talking about Apollo 8 the other day, and as help as one does, right, and, and, and how bold of a decision that was to just decide to put the crew on the Saturn 5 for the first time, you know, and, and then instead of just going to orbit to do a shakedown, to just go all the way around the moon, because. Why not? You know?
Rod Pyle
And can I add something to that?
Tarik Malik
Yeah, go ahead.
Rod Pyle
I did my talk at the Bowers Museum yesterday on this exact subject. So here's Apollo 8. They're ready to do this, the second orbital mission, as you point out, after Apollo 7. And this decision to go for the moon was made because, at least from the material I've seen or research, the CIA sent two reports over NASA headquarters. One was, hey, we think that the Russians might try for a loop the moon exercise, much like Artemis 2, actually, just to steal Apollo's thunder. And then a couple months later, hey, look, there's this enormous moon rocket out at the Russian launch site. This is not good. So the decision was made when the crew had four, count them.
Mike Wall
Four.
Rod Pyle
My finger. Count my fingers. Four months.
Tarik Malik
Four months.
Rod Pyle
And so, yeah, so you've got the risk of, of a relatively untried Saturn V rocket. You know, it flunked at least parts of both flight tests. Before this flight.
Tarik Malik
So they lost some engines on Apollo 6, right?
Rod Pyle
So, yeah, so it had pogo going on where it was, was surging. It lost a couple of engines. And crucially, the S4B stage didn't reignite once it was in space to push them into tli were that a manned mission. So it had all kinds of problems. You, you have tested the command module, the capsule, once in orbit to this length of time. But of course, we have a failure on the way to the moon and you don't have that lunar module as a lifeboat, then the crew's going to do a free return trajectory and come back to Earth dead, which is not good. And you have that service propulsion system engine which has been tested a couple of times. This is the engine on the, the back of the Apollo command module, slash, service module. But it's just one engine, right? So if that thing doesn't fire to get them out of lunar orbit, it's asta la vista, baby, and so on and so on and so on. So when you look back at it now, you know, at the time they were caught up in the Cold War, and Even though Apollo 1 had been a disaster, there's still a little bit of go fever, I think, and everything else. When you look back on this today, it's like you did what. It sounds horrifying, which is 1950s, early 1960s. We just got off of vacuum tubes technology. So I'm sorry, I really kind of jumped in there. But, but yeah, this was, this was a big deal.
Mike Wall
No, it is really astounding to think about the sort of risks NASA took during Apollo and what, what risks they were, they were willing to live with. And that just shows you it was such a different time. It was like a national security priority to beat the Soviets to the Moon. Right. It was a show of technological dominance and it was, it was viewed as like, hugely important to the nation and to, to our image abroad and to our technological supremacy and all this to do this and they were willing to take risks like that. It's a totally different environment now. I mean, we are trying to beat China back to the moon. I mean, you hear that a lot from US Officials, but yeah, it's not the sort of go, go, go. This is, this is do or die. We have to do this. We have to beat them to the moon. So we're going to throw caution to the wind sort of thing. They're, they're doing it in a much. Yeah, in a much more kind of like reserved, cautious way than we saw during Apollo.
Rod Pyle
Well, and just a reminder, as I say often, you know, this is a NASA that's doing easily 10 times as much as they were in the 1960s on 1/10 of the budget. So the, the lines on the graph meet in the wrong place. Speaking of which, let's go meet with a quick ad break and we'll be right back. So stand by.
Tarik Malik
As a contractor, I don't pay for materials I don't use, so why would I pay for stuff I don't need in my mobile plan? That's why my biz plan from Verizon Business is so, so perfect. Now I can choose exactly what I want and I only pay for what I need right now with my biz plan. Get our best price as low as $25 a line. Visit verizon.combusiness to get started today. New lines only. Price per month with 5 plus lines. Includes auto pay and paper free billing and promotional discounts, taxes, fees, economic adjustment charge applicable. Add ons prices and terms apply. Guarantee applies to base monthly rate and stated discounts only. Add on prices. Additional offers in March 31, 2026. All right, Mike, well, you, you just said that Artemis 1 launched in 2022. So that was the uncrewed test. And this is the crude test now for four years later. Rod, four years. Four years.
Rod Pyle
Count them for.
Tarik Malik
Right? How many, how many years were there from between Apollo, what, Apollo 6 and Apollo 8? One, maybe. Yeah.
Rod Pyle
And once they got the cadence of the crewed missions going, it was a matter of every two months or so.
Tarik Malik
I know, can you imagine? Anyway, anyway, I digress, I digress. But the reason I bring up that it's been four years since Artemis 1 is because people may have forgotten who is actually writing on Artemis 2. And I did see your note earlier this week that the crew is in quarantine, I assume again because they most likely were in quarantine for the first, the first run up. But who are these folks that are launching on the mission and what is the deal with quarantine? Do we know what they're doing? Do they just twiddle their thumbs for two weeks?
Mike Wall
Yeah. So this is the second entry into quarantine for them, although the first one, I think they were only in it for a day or so before we heard that NASA had to roll off the pad and stuff like that. So, yeah, there are four astronauts on the Artemis 2 mission. Three of them are from NASA. Like you have the Commander Reid Weissman, there's the pilot, Victor Glover, two mission specialists. One is from NASA. Christina Cook and the other is a Canadian Space Agency astronaut named Jeremy Hansen. And yeah, so they're currently in quarantine at Johnson Space center down in Houston, which is sort of NASA mission control for human spaceflight missions. And the main purpose is just so they stay healthy enough to launch. So nobody gets sick right before launch. You know, they aren't going. They're coming into contact with kids and stuff like that who can get sick at school and then give their parents a bug, which is what happened to me recently because I'm going over the weather. But yeah, so it's just, it's a safety measure for the astronauts and for the mission to stay on track because you don't want to launch people around the moon if they're sick, if they're not feeling well. And what if they get really sick on the flight and they, they can't, like, you know, they can't fulfill any of their duties and stuff like that. It's just, it's a bad situation. So this is a preventative measure to make sure everybody is healthy enough to launch. They'll stay in quarantine even after they come to the launch site. They're supposed to get to Kennedy Space center, which is a launch site, about five days before launch. They'll stay in quarantine there at ksc and then they go out and get on the rocket and fly to the moon.
Tarik Malik
Hopefully five days. That's like March 26th as we're recording this right now, if it's.
Mike Wall
I believe so. Yeah. Yeah. So, yeah, that'll depend on if they stick with April 1st as the target date and all that. Of course.
Tarik Malik
But yeah, and I know that Reid Wiseman was a former chief astronaut. Christina Cook spent nearly a year in space on the station. Victor Glover, obviously, I think he was on crew. He was on Crew 1, right. He was on the first operational Dragon flight. And is this Hanson's first flight or has he flown before?
Mike Wall
No, this is the rookie first flight. Yeah, it's a pretty nice first flight cherry assignment. Yeah, it's part of the agreement. I mean, Canada is a partner on the International Space Station and they're a partner on the Artemis program. They have agreed to supply Canada arm three to Gateway, which is the planned kind of moon orbiting space station that the Artemis program has. It's been a part of that architecture for a while, although that may have changed.
Tarik Malik
We're going to ask you about that later.
Mike Wall
Yeah, it seems like it might not be a part of it anymore, although that hasn't been officially confirmed. So yeah. So Jeremy Hansen is officially flying as part of the. It's to kind of reward Canada for their contributions to the Artemis program via Canadarm3. And yeah, I mean, Canadarm2 on the international Space Station is obviously Canadian too. And that's helped them get some astronauts up to the space station like once every five years or so, something like that. I'm not sure the exact numbers, but yeah.
Tarik Malik
Great.
Rod Pyle
And speaking of Jeremy Hansen, I will note that at Astra magazine, the issue coming out in about two weeks. Weeks. About 10 days. Has an exclusive. Exclusive, I tell you. Interview with Jeremy Hansen. Oh, there. Yeah.
Tarik Malik
Plug cough cough. Slight product readspace.com also. Cough cough.
Rod Pyle
Hey, I. I need all the readers I can get, so maybe you could kind of walk us through the mission Apollo 8, and then read us in on Artemis 2 to walk us through Apollo 8. Yeah, it's sort of a compare and contrast. Sorry, I didn't phrase that very well.
Tarik Malik
But.
Rod Pyle
But Apollo 8, you know, very different mission trajectory and set of timings than we've got coming up.
Mike Wall
Yeah. Do you want me or do you want Tarek to do that?
Rod Pyle
Kidding. I want you to do it.
Tarik Malik
Wow. So demand.
Rod Pyle
You know what? You guys can share. How's that?
Tarik Malik
This question wasn't on the rundown, so that's.
Mike Wall
No, no, no. Yeah, yeah. Do you want to do Apollo 8 and I'll do Artemis to talk.
Tarik Malik
Well, I mean, I could say that Apollo. We were just talking about Apollo 8. So I spent like a whole evening talking about Apollo 8. But that, that sent three astronauts, not four, around the moon. They actually entered lunar orbit for a time.
Rod Pyle
Right.
Tarik Malik
And so that is.
Mike Wall
Yeah, that famous photo 10 orbits. Yeah. Like the Earthrise photo, the really famous one comes from Apollo 8.
Tarik Malik
But, but so that, that was probably one of the biggest departures from. From what Artemis 2 is like, because Artemis 2 is a lot like Apollo 13 with that free return around the moon. I'm sure Mike's going to talk about that. But, but. So they launched in December of 68, got to the moon in a few days, entered orbit with that harrowing burn Christmas Eve. That's right, that harrowing burn on the far side of the moon when no one knew what was going on until they came back around and said that the burn was complete and everything was fine. And then like, like Rod said, they spent the day in orbit. They read Genesis on Christmas from. From the moon.
Rod Pyle
NASA got sued by the.
Tarik Malik
Yeah. I don't know if that was.
Rod Pyle
Whatever they were.
Tarik Malik
I don't know if that would ever happen. Again, if they did it that way or not. And, and they took all sorts of great pictures. They proved that it could be done. They set the stage for Apollo 9, 10, and then of course, 11 a year later. A year like within a year later, they launched, they launched three more missions and landed on the moon. That is just crazy how fast that pace was back then. But, and then they came back and they land safely in the, in the, in the, in the ocean with a smooth splashdown. So, so very, very slick of a mission. And like we talked about earlier, just, just, it's unbelievable now the amount of risk that was just built into that mission that everyone accepted because they were that confident in the hardware after all the tests that they had done.
Rod Pyle
So. Yeah, well, after the very few tests they had done. So. Yeah, sorry, Mike, go ahead.
Mike Wall
No, I was going to say so. So to contrast that with what we're going to see on this upcoming, like, Artemis 2 mission, it's, it's, it's a free return around the moon. So it's not going to enter orbit around the moon like a lot of the Apollo missions and that we've been talking about. So what it's basically going to do is just like go out far beyond the moon and then come back kind of slingshotted back by the moon's gravity to come back to Earth. That's all going to take place over the course of about 10 days. And this is sort of a lower risk trajectory than going into lunar orbit because it doesn't require engine burns for the return trip. Theoretically, if like everything goes well on the burn to the moon and put them on a precise trajectory where they'll just like loop around the moon naturally and come back kind of slingshotted by lunar gravity and they won't have to fire engines to make that burn to come home. It'll just happen naturally. So that's sort of like a risk reducing thing that's built into the mission. And it's kind of similar, as Tarek mentioned, to Apollo 13, which was supposed to go to the moon and land on the moon, but had a problem on the way. And they, they improvised like a free return trajectory to get themselves home safely. In one of the sort of best like space flight kind of survival stories ever told, that that turned into a free return trajectory, but that was just because that's how they handled that emergency that cropped up on the way to the moon. And yeah, so this is going to be quick. It's going to be over within 10 days. They're going to spend like the first day of the mission, if all goes to plan, in Earth orbit, basically checking out their Orion spacecraft, making sure everything's going well and. Yeah, and then they'll get a trans lunar injection burn and send them on the way to the moon. And I think they'll actually go farther away from the moon than any other people before them. I think if all goes to plan, they'll actually get farther away from the moon than Apollo 13 did. So they'll set, set, they'll, you know, they'll set some like, records on, on this mission coming up.
Tarik Malik
It's a prime time launch too, right? If they launch on the 1st of
Mike Wall
April, it's like a, it's like 6:30am or something.
Tarik Malik
Yeah, yeah, that's like that nightly news slot.
Mike Wall
Oh, yeah, yeah. And it's, it's, it's nice for us. I'm used to it. It seems like most launches these days are like three in the morning, but yeah, it's just like nice to actually have something and maybe it'll be like a sunset launch or something. It'll be like visually really, really nice if, if it all goes up off on, on time anyway.
Tarik Malik
Yeah, well, let's hope.
Rod Pyle
And depending on the, on the previous set of launch windows, I haven't seen it recalculated since then. Depending on when they go, the flyby could occur at anywhere from roughly 4,500 miles to almost 9,000 miles in altitude.
Mike Wall
Yeah, so that's the sort of range we're looking at. I mean, it isn't going to go like 100,000 miles beyond the moon. It'll go like, I don't know, 5 to 10,000 is the, is the sort of range. So not, not that far, but still farther than any Apollo mission did.
Rod Pyle
Well, yeah, Apollos were like 70, 60 nautical miles or 70 regular miles. I mean, they were really close.
Tarik Malik
Make a quick tart because I just realized I haven't seen a Crude launch since STS135 in 2011 with Mike.
Mike Wall
Actually, I think that's the last one for me too. Yeah, that's been a while.
Rod Pyle
All right, we got to go to break, so standby, don't go anywhere. We'll be right back. So Mike, you know, as we've been talking about launch dates sliding further and further into the year, there's been some questions raised by a group of academics, primarily about, hey, you know, we're reaching a kind of high point and slightly unstable point in the solar cycle in terms of solar activity, which of course is a risk for the astronauts, if we do have a coronal mass ejection or a flare or something while they're out there, they don't have a lot of protection against radiation. Is this a valid concern and is NASA taken into account?
Mike Wall
Yeah, I think it is a valid concern. I mean it's not a long space mission, so you don't have to worry a ton about the accumulated dose. I guess if they're only going to be gone for 10 days. But still, if there is like a mega eruption or something from the sun, it could affect their health over the long haul at least a little bit. And that's the thing, it's just the uncertainty involved that we don't really know. So for this reason I've been saying we are at a relatively active time and the Sun's 11 year activity cycle. And yeah, I believe there was a paper that came out maybe last month saying that it would be more prudent to sort of wait to launch this mission maybe for a couple years and when the sun is more quiescent and that obviously doesn't jive with NASA and the US Government's goal to beat China to the moon and get Artemis Cadence up and running. So it just goes into what we were talking about earlier, like how much risk are you willing to accept? This is one of the risks. There are other risks involved, like getting on a giant rocket in the first place, going into deep space on a spacecraft that has never carried people before. That's a risk that they're taking. So it's just part of the risk matrix. And they, I'm sure they've looked at this, I'm sure they have, they have analyses about space weather and what they can reasonably expect based on the point in the solar cycle. And they're deciding that it's, it's worth going ahead with.
Tarik Malik
Have you read, have you read James Michener, Space Rod? Did you read that?
Mike Wall
No.
Rod Pyle
My life is too short to read Mr. Books. I don't have enough time left.
Tarik Malik
A big, a big, a big spoiler for anyone that ever wants to read it because like Rod says, it's been out for like 70 years or whatever it is and, and, or 50 years and it's, it's, it's, it is super thick. But that is, that, that is like the big scenario that happens to their Apollo mission is the, is the, is the solar flare, you know, and. Yeah, and everything. And we deal with that.
Rod Pyle
We hear the talk about human tissue, but I didn't hear any specific references to electronics on board so are they sufficiently hardened or is that just not something that chose to mention?
Mike Wall
I would, I would assume that they are. You know that that goes into the building of any deep space spacecraft. Right. There are margins for that, I would imagine all like all the critical electronics must have a margin that would take into account a big space weather event.
Tarik Malik
Yeah. And they are on the cruise out to the moon. They're doing these tests because they have these little equipment bays in the back of Orion.
Mike Wall
Yeah.
Tarik Malik
And they're, they're doing these tests to like make a makeshift shelter for the crew there to see what it, what it would take for them to like, I guess kind of bury themselves.
Rod Pyle
Oh, when you say equipment bay, you're not talking about where they used to have the sim bay on Apollo. You're talking about the actual back of
Tarik Malik
the, inside the back under the seats. You know, under the seats in the, in the Orion spacecraft they're going to do like a test.
Rod Pyle
So you stack all your junk in there and then you go heat shield first towards the sun and hide.
Tarik Malik
Yeah, yeah, yeah. And that'll be interesting to see how that works. And if it, if. Because they didn't do that on Apollo so well.
Mike Wall
And they've got some Data from Artemis 1, keep in mind that was like a 25 day mission to lunar orbit. It spent most of its time in lunar orbit. And they had one full size kind of dummy mannequin and they had two kind of torso mannequins that had all these radiation sensors embedded in them and stuff like that. So they got radiation dose data from those three mannequins basically on a 25 day moon mission. And I'm sure they obviously took that into account when designing this mission and deciding what was worth the risk and what was not. And so that's all been baked into this mission too.
Tarik Malik
What's that vest that they, there's that, that Israeli company that built that. Astro Red.
Mike Wall
Yeah.
Tarik Malik
Built that vest that they can wear. I've worn it. It's like wearing a really heavy life jacket. Yeah, it's like, it's like wearing a bulletproof life, like a radiation. Also a life jacket.
Mike Wall
It's like the dentist chair. They put you, they give you that apron when you, they put that apron
Rod Pyle
on you and they run from the room and push the button from far, far, far away. Tarek, you're up.
Tarik Malik
Well, yeah, well, you know, I guess one of the things that has happened since the last time Rod and I had a big Artemis discussion since you joined us is that the, the path Beyond Artemis 2. And I saw that was a headline on Space.com this week. So by Leonard looks a bit different than before because this mission, like you said, is really going to go all the way around the moon and do that free return. And then of course we all expected, you know, next year, in two years to land on the moon with Artemis 3. But you know, we found out from Jared Isaacman that that's not the case anymore. And, and I was wondering if you can kind of give people like an update about like how big of a shake up NASA did earlier this year to its plans for Artemis after this mission because you know, after Apollo 8, Apollo 9 launched like within that year. But that's not going to be the case for this one. So.
Mike Wall
Well, this is sort of this the shakeup that you're talking about. You know, we thought for a long time that the first kind of. Yeah, like the first Artemis landing mission with astronauts would be Artemis 3 in like 2027. Ish. You know, it kept getting pushed back. Like the original date was hopefully going to be 2024 or so, but it's been pushed back. But it was still Artemis 3. They were going to do it after Artemis 2, but then just about three weeks ago, you know, in like late February, Jared Isaacman announced that actually no, we're shaking up the Artemis architecture and we're going to change Artemis 3. Artemis 3 is not going to the moon at all. It's going to Earth orbit. So it'll be like an Apollo 9 which was basically testing docking procedures and stuff like that with different moon hardware. And that's what, like that's what Artemis 3 is going to be now. So they're going to, it'll, it'll, it'll carry astronauts and they'll do a bunch of tests, but they'll stay in Earth orbit. What they're going to do is basically practice docking with the Orion spacecraft and one or both of the private crude moon landers that NASA has tasked with with getting Artemis astronauts down on the lunar surface. One by Space, X one by Blue Origin. And they've, they've said, you know, like whichever one is ready, we'll do these practice docking maneuvers on Artemis 3 with them. If both are ready, then we may do it with both of them. So there's still, yeah, so there's still a lot of open endedness about what's the ha.
Tarik Malik
Well, you don't, you don't, you don't hold the belief, Rod, that that two companies could independently have their moon landers
Rod Pyle
ready to go, oh well, the nice, nice way to sterilize the question. You know, when, when SpaceX first got that award, I was sort of, oh, you go guys. You know, because it was a, a much lower bid than Blue.
Mike Wall
It was 2021 too. I think it's important. That was, it was like five years ago when they won that NASA contract.
Rod Pyle
Yeah. We still thought Starship might mature on a linear scale and since then, however, and, and you know, not throwing shade at SpaceX, but it's like tick tock, you know, you guys really got to get this thing going. And we haven't seen, at least I haven't seen any tangible evidence of a lot of work going on the lunar lander. They're still fiddling around with getting into orbit and making a fully complete test of the starship system. So Mike, polish your crystal ball for a moment and tell us what you expect. I know this is hateful. Tell us what you expect in terms of what's going to happen for Artemis 3. If it's on time, who, if anybody, do they actually meet up with in orbit?
Mike Wall
Yeah, it could go either way, I think, I know that's wishy washy, but I mean, keep in mind, you know, we've seen starship under development for a long time. It launched for the first time in April 2023. So just about three years ago, they're gearing up for the 12th test flight, which is with this new V3 Starship, which is the version that will be capable of going to the moon and to Mars. So theoretically, and they have this huge kind of manufacturing complex system going down at Starbase in South Texas where they're churning out lots of starship super heavy boosters and ship upper stages. And SpaceX's history with the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy, you like have to give them the benefit of the doubt that once they figure some basic things out with Starship, that they will be able to ratchet up pretty quickly. There's still a lot of complicating things they need to do. Just like you mentioned, they still haven't reached orbit. All their test flights have been suborbital. So they need to demonstrate getting to Earth orbit. They also need to demonstrate off Earth refueling. There's a bit of controversy or kind of debate about how many times how many missions you'll have to launch to a starship upper stage that's going to the moon to fill it up to get there. Some people say it could be like a dozen or so. So every single moon bound starship lander would need 12, like additional launches to dock with it and fuel it up there. I mean, some of the SpaceX people say it's less than that, but it's kind of up in the air as far as we know. And there's a life support stuff. Like obviously they have a lot of experience with life support with their crew Dragon, which has flown multiple missions to the space station and free flying in Earth orbit. But Starship has never been outfitted with any kind of semblance of life support. So that would have to. It's a much bigger scale, it's a much bigger vehicle. So that remains to be, to be done as well. And then. But there's still more flight heritage with Starship than with Blue Moon, which is the Blue Origin lander. But you've seen a real push by Blue Origin to like ratchet up the Blue Moon work. They recently said they're standing down from their new shepherd kind of space tourism flights to suborbital space for at least the next two years while they devote more resources to getting Blue Moon up and running. And they're supposed to launch like the first uncrewed kind of test flight of that thing in the next, I don't know, few months maybe, or next, by the end of the year anyway. So they're, they're going like full out and these are very difficult things. I don't know. I think it could go either way. I think it's possible one of them is ready. I think it's possible they both could be ready. I'm not going to bet on which one because both of them have immense resources and I think they're both very committed to this. Like, I think SpaceX is already smarting a little bit from some of these. They've taken a few black eyes with. It was publicly stated by, by the previous NASA administrator, Bill Nelson, that, you know, that the sort of delays with Starship have affected the Artemis timeline and in fact like the kind of NASA, the like acting NASA administrator who was leading the agency before. Jared Eisenman. Yeah. Sean Duffy had said he was opening up the Artemis 3 landing contract to other players because SpaceX's development was too slow with Starship. So I think they're obviously very motivated to do this and do this fast and their track record suggests you should take that seriously. But it's a very difficult thing. So it's just really hard to know
Rod Pyle
he's not taking the bet. Okay, wait a second, Tarek, we got to go to a break. But before we do, I keep Seeing Mike thumbnails on YouTube with stories about SpaceX's new design doesn't need refueling to land on the moon, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. It's this short, stumpy thing on four landing legs, like an eagle out of space. 1999. Is there any credence to any of this or is it all just dreamland?
Mike Wall
Not that I've seen. As far as I know, Starship is their vehicle, right? I mean there was back in the early days when they were talking about going to the moon, they had this like red or going to Mars, they had this red Dragon mission concept where they'd send a version of Crew Dragon. But that's, that's been off the table for years. You know, ever since they started developing Starship, it was like, this is the thing, this is the thing that's going to open up the solar system. Starship or bust.
Rod Pyle
So, so this was supposedly a shorter starship that would either land on much wider landing legs, much closer to the lunar surface, or as one illustration, had it landing sideways on landing legs. But that would be kind of a major departure from the design.
Mike Wall
Yeah, I mean, I mean, I guess we'll see. I haven't seen anything official from SpaceX or from Elon Musk, but like, I don't know.
Rod Pyle
Yeah, well, they, they do pivot faster than most. Okay, let's pivot to a break and we'll be right back with Tarik's next burning question.
Tarik Malik
So I just had one more question, Mike, to kind of close out the, the lunar lander thing, especially for that test for Artemis 3 that's coming out, is could we see, do you think, do you think this is possible that. Let's say that these landers actually aren't ready, but either Blue Origin or SpaceX or both have a docking system that they can just slap on a, like a shell and that they could say, okay, this is what you're going to go rendezvous with is like this, this, this docking system shell thing. Or would that not be acceptable, do you think, to NASA? I know it's kind of like a, an out there question, but I was just thinking about it this morning.
Mike Wall
I mean it's, it's, it's hard to say. Like, I think, I mean, Jared Eisenman has said, has shown since he came into the top job that he's not afraid to shake things up and to do things. He comes from the private sector, he's a tech billionaire and he's used to working fast. And he's a private astronaut himself. He's booked two flights with SpaceX. So he has experience actually being an astronaut and doing things in space. And I wouldn't be shocked if he decides that something new, a radical new approach is needed. He did shake up Artemis 3 and Artemis 4. The entire Artemis architecture to be totally different than it had been for years. Right. So I don't know about the specific that you're talking about, but I mean, I would not be shocked if he decided that, well, this is not the approach that's going to get us to the moon before China or that's going to be what we need for a sustainable kind of human development on the moon, which is what Artemis is all about. And we need to go quicker now and then kind of fill it out later with more sustainable. It like, wouldn't be surprising to me if he did come to some kind of decision like that, because that's the kind of guy he's shown himself to be, is to be willing to make big decisions and big, big changes.
Tarik Malik
I could see like both sides of the coin, you know, I could see like, okay, you're going to send up the bare bones lander that can do the job, but it can also dock and that's good. Or I could see them saying, hey, look what Boeing did with Starliner where they kept doing a test flight without entire vehicle fully done. And then look how well that turned out. I'm being sarcastic.
Mike Wall
Yeah.
Tarik Malik
People who are listening, I'm making a big face and everything. You know, it didn't turn out. And so if you don't have it like full up, ready to go, you're not going and we're going to find something else.
Rod Pyle
But it's interesting, there is a historical context for this. In the Gemini days, they used to launch an Agena upgrade.
Tarik Malik
Yeah, yeah.
Rod Pyle
Which was just basically a rocket engine with a docking collar on the front. And then the Gemini capsule with two astronauts and it could dock with that and they could blast themselves to higher orbits and all that kind of stuff
Tarik Malik
almost killed Neil Armstrong. Right.
Rod Pyle
One flight where the Agena didn't work because the, the, it blew up on launch. Then they launched an augmented target docking adapter, the atda, which was just basically a rocket stage with maneuvering jets. It didn't have a big engine to move anywhere. But then the, the nose cone got all hung up so they couldn't even dock with that. So they did Angry Alligator. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So there is some precedent for that, I guess, but yeah. You think, given the paucity of budget these days in terms of at Least comparing this to the Apollo program and what we're up against, you'd think you'd hope that he'd say, okay, look, let's just either hold off until you're ready to send up your lunar lander, or maybe they'll put landing legs on a Dragon capsule and call it a day. Who knows? I mean, all kinds of things could happen. Where are we? This, this was a long running story that kind of disappeared a while ago. Axiom supposed to be developing our lunar EVA suit so that we have something to walk around on the moon in which we haven't done since the 60s. Either done the walking or done the suit design. Where are we with the EVA suits?
Mike Wall
Yeah, that's another, that's another kind of hurdle that needs to be cleared before we can start doing things on the moon. You know, I mean, they are, they're continuing to, to be developed, and I think the plan is to give them a test on Artemis 3. I think, think the plan is to have them ready by Artemis 3. And I guess 20, 27, we, we shall see.
Tarik Malik
Huh.
Mike Wall
Wow.
Tarik Malik
With Prada, no doubt. Right?
Rod Pyle
So, so, Mike, what the heck is happening with, with Lunar Gateway? It comes, it goes.
Tarik Malik
Yeah, we said we're gonna talk about that Gateway. You said, you said, you said they're still doing it, Mike, but maybe. Are they still doing it?
Mike Wall
I think the writing is on the wall that it's, it's not going to. Probably not going to happen. You know, there's, there's not a lot of mention of the Gateway. You know, when, when Jared Eisen announced the big reshuffle for, everybody kind of
Rod Pyle
looks at their shoes, right?
Mike Wall
Yeah, nobody, I mean, there's, there's not really a mention of Gateway. And people have asked, have asked NASA officials about that, like explicitly during a few press conferences. So what does this mean for Gateway? And the basic answer is, well, you know, we're, we're keeping everything in mind and we have an open mind and we're just. We'll talk about that later when we make a decision. So it does, it doesn't seem great. Like this thing that was for a long time, like a core part of the Artemis architecture apparently is no longer regarded as such. Doesn't mean it's definitely out of the picture, but it seems like it's not on as firm a ground as it used to be. So I wouldn't be surprised at all if it's, if it's canceled that's such
Tarik Malik
a ripple effect because I'm pretty sure that like Lockheed or Northrop Grumman have already built like a power propulsion module thing already for that. Like you mentioned earlier, Canada is on the hook for Canada. Arm 3. SpaceX has the contract for some kind of supply tug that's supposed to go there. But the whole thing like station Gateway was built to be in that near rectilinear orbit thing, that halo orbit. And then it was all supposed to be the big next thing after, I guess the ISS retired and to give space station people, I guess something to do until the commercial space station stuff comes up and running. So that'd be weird. Apollo didn't have a space station. I think we would have liked to have had one, but, but that's sort
Mike Wall
of the argument of the people who want us to see it act. It's like what, what purpose does it serve? If we want to go to the surface, why are we kind of putzing around in lunar orbit? Like why not just go to the moon, go to the surface, build a base. If that's the plan, just do that. So yeah, that's, that's the argument that it would be kind of extraneous to the whole moon based project which Artemis is supposedly all about.
Tarik Malik
Maybe you could cut down on the amount of starship launches that you would need because you've already got the lunar lander all at the moon and you can just fill it back up again with whatever. I don't know if that even cuts down the amount of launches you would have to do. So we got to do the starship math on that figure, figure it out.
Mike Wall
Well, I don't think anybody knows the starship math about how many refueling efforts are needed and all that stuff. It's still kind of hazy. Right.
Rod Pyle
So I will never forget that press conference where that, that reporter said how many will there be Exactly? And the SpaceX rep, Tiffany or Amber or whatever her name was kind of went, well, we think it'll be about the Bebe, blah, blah, a Nelson in a rare.
Tarik Malik
No, they didn't say, they didn't want to say.
Rod Pyle
That's what I'm saying. Well she was, she was flubbering around and maybe, you know, 6, 11, 100. And Nelson said, I do believe the reporter asked you exactly how many refueling flats. And so she still wouldn't be pinned down to a number. So no, I think she said, I
Tarik Malik
think she said 15 to 19 or something.
Rod Pyle
Well, she kind of mudded, she kind of trailed off. I think about. Blum, I can't hear you.
Tarik Malik
Oh, I want to find that again.
Rod Pyle
Burn outside the Window. Okay, hush. So, Mike, you mentioned the word moon base and maybe we can end on this. We recently read that there's some legislation heading finally, years later to talk about the moon base that Artemis was supposed to be building towards from the very beginning. Have I got that right?
Mike Wall
Yeah, I think so. It's just like buy in from Congress, like officially. I think that's not surprising though. You know, Congress has been on board with the broad push to beat China back to the moon. It's sort of a bipartisan partisan issue. And yeah, it's not surprising that they're sort of coming to show their support for this project. We'll see if it means there'll be more money for it. You know, I mean, like you were talking. Rod, a big difference between what we saw during Apollo and what we see now. I mean, why Apollo could happen so fast is because of the money, you know, each, each year during the height of Apollo, like, yeah, NASA got about 4% of the federal budget and now it's like, like 0.25% of the federal budget, something like that. In that rate, it's, it's. Yeah, it's like an order of magnitude less as it shared up the federal.
Rod Pyle
Exactly.
Mike Wall
Yeah. So it's like, it's like really, that's a big difference in why we could do so much stuff during Apollo and why we can't do as much stuff today. And also NASA's doing a lot more things, like a lot more science machines.
Rod Pyle
Exactly. I was going to say, you know, back, back then we had Gemini Mariner, Mars Mariner, Venus, and a couple lunar things and a handful of Earth satellites. And now we got stuff all over the solar system.
Mike Wall
Them.
Rod Pyle
Yeah, the dozens. So. Yeah.
Mike Wall
So when people ask why, why can't NASA do what it did 60 years ago or whatever, that's a big part of the answer is they don't have the money and they're spread more thinly. If Congress, if Congress's endorsement of the moon base comes with extra money, I'm sure NASA would very much appreciate that. But we, we shall see.
Rod Pyle
That would show unusual courage.
Mike Wall
Yeah, well, yeah, when you see, I mean, the, the, like the war in Iran might get an extra 200 billion. I'm sure NASA would, would be happy for a slice of that pie. Yeah, yeah.
Tarik Malik
I was going to say so. I'm glad that you said it so well, I guess we can end just because we have to get to the moon first, at least to circle it before we can think about moon bases and moon rovers, which we didn't talk about this episode, but, but that's definitely something that's in the drawing books as well. What are the next immediate things that people should be looking for to know if Artemis 2 is going to actually get off the ground? No joke. On April Fool's Day on April 1, are there other key tests that NASA's going to do or announcements? Obviously the crew has to get to Florida. That's one thing. Right. But what else?
Mike Wall
Yeah, well it's kind of hard to say because there's not going to be another wet dress rehearsal. So that was always the big kind of gating moment is like did it pass the wet dress? Did the fueling any leaks during the fueling? So I'm not sure what the milestones are going to be. NASA hasn't been super forthcoming about the exact plan between now and launch. We'll just have to wait for some updates. They'll do all their systems checks on the pad, just check the batteries, all that stuff, check the seals, all the stuff that they do in the lead up to launch. And yeah, we'll just have to see if those go well. But with, but, but with no wet dress rehearsal, there's, there isn't like this huge milestone they have have to pass.
Tarik Malik
If the crew gets to Florida and NASA schedules a launch readiness review briefing, L minus 3, then maybe they'll be ready to go.
Mike Wall
Okay, for sure.
Tarik Malik
That's right. That's right.
Rod Pyle
So got to get serious about getting an airplane.
Tarik Malik
You know, by the way, if they delay because the window Mike said is the April 1 to April 6 right now and then April 30 and if they delay to April 6 and get off the ground, that means that these astronauts are going to be around the moon in tax day like Apollo 13 and I hope they've all paid their taxes already or at least gotten exempt status.
Mike Wall
Well then we can write a story about it.
Tarik Malik
Then we can write a story about it. That's right. Only@space.com Please, please go read everybody for
Rod Pyle
the low hanging fruit. Well, I want to thank everybody for joining us today for episode number 202, 202 call Artemis imminent with space jock Mike Wall. Mike, remind us where we might best stalk you online or follow, follow shock,
Tarik Malik
he said
Mike Wall
I'm on X Michael D. Wall, but I don't post very often there if at all. So I would just go to space.com to the homepage and you can find me there in our search bar and see all the stuff I've been working on or just, yeah, just like see our space flight and tech sections and see all the stories that we're churning out.
Tarik Malik
Buy his book.
Mike Wall
There will be a lot of Artemis stories coming in the next couple weeks, that's for sure.
Rod Pyle
Yeah, so buy his book, which is called.
Mike Wall
It is called out There. It's like it came out in 2018, I believe. It's like talking about the search for alien life and what it might mean, how that search is proceeding or was proceeding and how. What, what it might mean if we actually find alien life, what it might look like and all that sort of stuff.
Rod Pyle
So, yeah, that puts you one book above. Well, anyway, Tarik, where should we look for you and Web, I wonder where
Tarik Malik
you were going with that, that statement, Rod.
Rod Pyle
So where do we find you?
Tarik Malik
Well, you can find me@space.com as always, in, in two weeks, maybe you find me in Florida in three weeks or maybe Rod will be together in Houston and, and of course on all the socials, @tarikj. Malik, on YouTube, @spacetronplays. And this weekend we're celebrating Eid and a new season for Fortnite, new season for Marvel Rivals, A lot of good stuff, stuff for video games. So if you like video games, come
Rod Pyle
find me there, because why wouldn't you? And of course, you can find me at pilebooks.com or@astermagazine.com or probably in a couple of weeks in Houston at a Roadway Inn or a Motel 6, because I'm sure that's where I'll end up having to stay.
Tarik Malik
And remember, we'll leave the light on for you, Rod.
Rod Pyle
Yeah, please, you can always drop us a line at twistwit tv. We do welcome your comments, suggestions, ideas and space jokes. That's Twisted Twit tv. New episodes publish every Friday on your favorite podcaster. So make sure to subscribe, tell your friends, give us reviews. We'll take whatever, whatever denomination that they, they have, whether it's thumbs up or stars or other things. And you can also follow the Twittech podcast network at Twit on Twitter and on Facebook, at TWiT TV on Instagram. And we thank you for being with us for 202, count them, 202 blazingly fun, blindingly entertaining episodes. And we will be back next week with number 203. See you then. Thanks, Mike.
Tarik Malik
Thank you.
Mike Wall
Ya, thank you.
In this lively and informative episode, hosts Rod Pyle and Tarik Malik are joined by veteran space journalist Mike Wall (Space.com) to tackle the imminent Artemis II mission, review Blue Origin’s asteroid-hunting plans, dissect Rocket Lab’s new military contract, and examine the ever-shifting roadmap for NASA’s return to the Moon. The conversation careens from playful banter to deep technical dives, providing history, expert insight, and personal anecdotes throughout.
[05:28 – 09:31]
Blue Origin's New Partnership
Dual-Phase Mitigation Strategy
Fun Digression:
Hosts reference sci-fi “sun guns” and orbital reflectors, illustrating public concerns about weaponized space technology.
[11:12 – 13:21]
Rocket Lab’s 190M Deal
Cost Perspective
[13:23 – 14:26]
[19:55 – 24:37]
Timeline Recap
Launch Window
[29:20 – 32:56]
[33:18 – 38:29]
Apollo 8 (1968):
Artemis II:
[38:48 – 43:13]
[44:07 – 46:25]
[46:25 – 52:32]
[54:36 – 57:06]
[58:28 – 59:55]
[60:09 – End]
On Artemis II’s Delays:
Tarik: “Four years. Four years!” [29:20]
Rod: “Once they got the cadence of the crewed missions going, it was a matter of every two months or so.” [29:29]
On Blue Origin’s Asteroid Mission:
Tarik: “It's very nice of Jeff Bezos that he wants to protect all of us on the planet by finding asteroids—so that we can consume more of Amazon Prime.” [06:13]
On Apollo Eras’ Risk Tolerance:
Rod: “When you look back on this today...It sounds horrifying...We just got off of vacuum tubes technology.” [26:04]
Mike: “It was a national security priority to beat the Soviets to the Moon...They were willing to take risks like that. It's a totally different environment now.” [27:37]
On Artemis II’s Trajectory:
Mike: “It’s going to be quick, over within 10 days...lower risk trajectory than going into lunar orbit.” [37:41]
On NASA’s Budget & Scope:
Rod: “NASA that’s doing easily 10 times as much as they were in the 1960s on 1/10 of the budget.” [28:23]
On Lunar Gateway’s Fate:
Mike: “The writing is on the wall that it’s probably not going to happen.” [55:15]
Tarik: “That’s such a ripple effect because ... Lockheed or Northrop Grumman have already built like a power propulsion module thing already.” [56:00]
On the Artemis Cadence vs. Apollo:
Tarik: “Can you imagine? Anyway, anyway, I digress...” [29:34]
The show features jovial banter, inside jokes, and light sarcasm—with a deep respect for technical detail and a keen sense of space history. Witty, approachable, and occasionally self-deprecating (“If we sell your house…,” “He’s our crutch guy”), the hosts make advanced spaceflight topics accessible and engaging.
Mike Wall:
Rod Pyle:
Tarik Malik:
This summary captures the episode’s spirit, technical depth, and key information. All ad segments, intro/outro material, and off-topic banter have been omitted for clarity.