The Brian Walshe Trial: “Nothing Violent Happened In That House”

Summary

---

Podcast Summary: The Brian Walshe Trial: “Nothing Violent Happened In That House”

Podcast: Amy Robach & T.J. Holmes Present (iHeartPodcasts)
Date: December 12, 2025
Hosts: Amy Robach & T.J. Holmes
Episode Theme: An in-depth breakdown and reaction to the closing arguments in the trial of Brian Walshe, focusing on the strengths and tactics of the defense, and the perceived shortcomings of the prosecution.

---

Episode Overview

Amy Robach and TJ Holmes discuss the closing phase of the Brian Walshe murder trial, with particular emphasis on how defense attorney Larry Tipton delivered his final arguments. They reflect on the evidence (and lack thereof), the strategies from both the defense and prosecution, and how these may impact the jury’s decision. The hosts provide insider-style analysis geared toward legal laypersons, noting their surprise at the effectiveness of the defense in what seemed like an "impossible" case.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. State of the Trial

• Current Status: The trial is at the closing arguments stage. Defense attorney Larry Tipton has finished; the prosecution is closing as of recording. Jury deliberation is imminent.
• Surprise at Trial’s Pace: The hosts express astonishment that the trial could wrap up within two weeks, expecting it to have lasted longer.
  • “I don't want to go as far as, say, shockingly, but maybe it's wrapping up today.” (TJ, 18:10)

2. The Defense’s Closing Argument: Tipton’s Strategy

• Superior Presentation: Tipton’s style described as compelling, colloquial, and highly attentive to juror engagement.
  • “You pay attention, you sit up. When he speaks. He is an amazing speaker, an orator… when he tells a story, you pay attention.” (Amy, 04:26)
• Main Defense Line: “Nothing violent happened in that house.”
  • Tipton focuses on the lack of direct evidence of a violent act within the Walsh home.
    • “If something so violent happened in that house. You telling me he cleaned up so well that your investigators for days could find nothing in the bedroom or the living room?” (TJ, 06:29)
• Physical Evidence Problems: Inconsistent clean-up; blood only found in the basement, not in the bedroom or living areas, which raises questions about the prosecution’s theory.
  • “If he was so good at cleaning the bathroom and the bedroom and the other areas of the house, how is it that he wasn't as good at cleaning up the basement? Those two things don't make sense.” (Amy, 07:06)

3. Search History and Digital Evidence

• Searches as Evidence: The hosts detail how damning the Google searches (e.g., body disposal, cleaning blood, hacksawing a body) appear on their face.
• Defense Tactic: Tipton reframed the incriminating searches by questioning their timeline and suggesting they don’t necessarily indicate premeditation.
  • “He asks the jurors then, and you appreciated this when he created this testimony, to consider the timing—the searches about murder and cleanup occurred six hours after Anna Walsh died.” (Amy, 09:10)
  • Tipton relates search behavior to common experience:
    • “We've all done that before. We had to get more specific in our searches.” (paraphrasing Tipton, TJ, 10:07)

4. Emphasis on Reasonable Doubt

• Standard of Proof: The defense centered their argument on reasonable doubt, pressing that the prosecution hadn’t established how, or even if, Anna Walsh was murdered.
  • “There is some doubt about how this woman died, we don't know. But neither side has proven how she died. And if you didn't prove how she died, that means you didn't prove she was killed. And if you didn't prove she was killed... what is the jury going to do with this case?” (TJ, 07:49)
• Prosecution’s Flaws: Both hosts repeatedly mention the prosecution’s failure to “connect the dots” or tell a cohesive story.
  • “I was confused for most of the prosecution's case.” (Amy, 03:19)
  • “They're giving you... thousands of points of data... but not telling you what to think about it.” (TJ, 19:07)

5. Jury Dynamics and the "One Juror"

• Tipton’s strategy explicitly targets the idea of “just one juror” holding out, planting doubt to avoid a unanimous guilty verdict.
  • “He needs one juror, and it was very obvious he knows he needs one juror, and he was trying to reach out to whoever that one juror is. To hold true to your convictions...” (Amy, 12:29)
• The hosts predict a hung jury or mistrial may result from this approach.
  • “If I had to make a prediction, I am mistrial in this thing right now.” (TJ, 13:19)

6. Motives and Gaps in the State's Case

• No Clear Motive: Hosts underscore prosecution’s inability to prove a concrete motive—whether regarding an affair or finances.
  • “Do I know for sure that he knew about the affair? No, I do not. ...Do I know for sure that they had some financial money issue and that was the reason he killed her? No...” (TJ, 11:48)
• Absence of Direct Evidence: Tipton and the hosts emphasize the lack of direct evidence—no body, no proven cause of death, and no established intent or premeditation.
  • “He made a point at the end that there's no evidence. You don't have evidence. You got evidence that he lied to police. You got evidence that he disposed of a body... There's no evidence of a murder.” (TJ, 22:05)

7. Defense’s Narrative: “There’s No Evidence of Anything But Love”

• Reframing Brian Walshe's Actions: Defense uses evidence of Brian’s attentive acts (like planning family dinners) as proof of love rather than premeditated murder.
  • “There's no evidence of anything but love. And when he said—worked on me in the moment because he had just framed... all these other things that Brian Walsh did that seemingly were of a guy who loved his wife and was planning for a future with his wife.” (TJ, 22:26)

8. The "Cherry Picking" Accusation

• Tipton’s closing included an argument that the prosecution “cherry picked” evidence but failed to provide a coherent narrative.
  • (Teased as a segment, but the exposition was interrupted by advertisements—see 14:28.)

9. Prosecution’s “Data Dump” Critique

• Both hosts were critical of the prosecution’s style, describing the evidentiary presentation as monotone and lacking narrative closure.
  • “You had the witness up there... He would read the search and then she'd move on to the next one. These were some of the most devastating lines and searches... and it was delivered in such a monotone way.” (TJ, 19:07)
  • “It was as if the prosecution didn't want to lead the jury. Like, that's your job...” (Amy, 20:24)

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• “Nothing violent happened in that house.”
  — Larry Tipton, quoted by Amy (05:38)

• “He only needs one. If I had to make a prediction, I am mistrial in this thing right now.”
  — TJ Holmes (13:19)

• “If you didn't prove how she died, that means you didn't prove she was killed. And if you didn't prove she was killed… what is the jury going to do with this case?”
  — TJ Holmes (07:49)

• “There's no evidence of anything but love.”
  — Larry Tipton, paraphrased by TJ (22:26)

• “You're actually supposed to lead the jury and tell them what to think and show them why they should think this. And she didn't do that … when you don't connect the dots for the jurors and expect them to do that on their own, …that made no sense.”
  — Amy Robach (20:24)

---

Important Timestamps

• 02:49 – Introduction to the trial update and closing arguments.
• 04:07 – Hosts discuss defense’s presentation style.
• 05:38 – “Nothing violent happened in that house.”
• 07:06 – Analysis of blood evidence and defense’s logic.
• 09:10 – Defense’s reframing of search history timelines.
• 10:18 – Defense connects with jurors’ personal experience using search engines.
• 12:29 – Emphasis on the “one juror” strategy.
• 13:19 – Hosts predict a mistrial/hung jury.
• 19:07 – Critique of prosecution’s presentation.
• 22:26 – Defense reframes evidence as signs of love.
• 24:22 – Defense disputes evidence of motive or premeditation.

---

Natural Tone & Observational Reflections

Throughout, Amy and TJ balance legal layperson curiosity with empathy for the victim while maintaining neutrality toward the outcome. Their conversation is lively, sometimes shocked by the skill of the defense or the prosecution’s failings, and informed by their extensive experience covering trials.

• “We have sat through many trials, babe. I have sat through so many murder cases, so have you. In local news, cable news, network news. So we do have some perspective. And it was shocking, at least from our perspective. What the prosecutors chose to leave to the discretion of jurors, that was confusing to me.” (Amy, 21:23)

---

Takeaway

This episode provides a vivid sense of suspense in the Brian Walshe trial, highlighting the razor-thin line between guilt and reasonable doubt. Most compelling is how Larry Tipton’s defense—despite the apparent mountain of circumstantial evidence—creates plausible alternative narratives and leverages weaknesses in the prosecution’s approach. Ultimately, the jury’s decision comes down to how much doubt the defense was able to instill, and whether one holdout juror can prevent a conviction.

---

Transcript

[Podcast Announcer]

This is an iHeart podcast. Guaranteed Human.

[Ryan Reynolds]

So let me get this straight. Your company has data here, there and everywhere but your AI can't use the data because it's here, there and everywhere? Seems like something's missing. Every business has unique data. IBM helps your AI access your data wherever it lives to change how you do business. Lets create smile to business IBM.

[Kal Penn]

Hey audiobook lovers. I'm Cal Penn.

[Ed Helms]

I'm Ed Helms.

[Kal Penn]

Ed and I are inviting you to join the best sounding book club you've ever heard with our new podcast, Irsay The Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club.

[Ed Helms]

Each week we sit down with your favorite iHeart podcast hosts and some very special guests to discuss the latest and.

[Kal Penn]

Greatest audiobooks from audible, listen to Earsay on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Follow Earsay and start listening on the free iHeartradio app.

[Amy Robach]

Today a GLP1 helped you lose weight, but now you're noticing unwanted facial changes.

[TJ Holmes]

Yeah, the weight came off, but facial volume loss and dull sagging skin are making you look older. That's where the next phase of your weight loss journey comes in.

[Amy Robach]

There's before weight loss, after weight loss, and then the after.

[TJ Holmes]

Yeah, help restore and refresh your facial skin and reclaim your natural looking youthful glow.

[Amy Robach]

To learn more, visit face after weight loss.com that's face after weight loss.com make.

[Pandora Jewelry Advertiser]

Their holiday unforgettable with a gift that says it all from Pandora Jewelry. A gift that tells a story and shows you know theirs that doesn't just sparkle but speaks. From new festive charms to forever rings and personal engravings, this season give a gift that's perfectly theirs. Whether you're shopping for a shiny surprise for your significant other, matching bracelets to celebrate your friendship, or a heartfelt gift for a family member. Say more this holiday season with Pandora. Shop [e-mail] or visit your closest Pandora store.

[Podcast Announcer]

20Th Century Studios presents the upcoming comedy Ella McKay from Academy Award winning writer director James L. Brooks. Emma Mackey plays Ella McKay, an idealistic young woman who juggles her family and work life in a story about the people you love and how to survive them. Featuring all star cast including Emma Mackey, Jamie Lee Curtis, Jack Louden, Kumail Nanjiani, Ayo Adebiri, Julie Kavner. With Albert Brooks and Woody Harrelson. Alex Ella McKay now playing.

[TJ Holmes]

Hey There Folks. It is Friday, December 12th. Closing arguments are underway in the trial of Brian Walsh. And with that welcome to this episode of Amy and TJ Robes. Their part we we listened through Tipton the defense Already. And it's strange to say, listening to him, we felt seen. He made some points that throughout we were having the same feeling and he was doing it. But to say the prosecution has just given you a bunch of stuff and says, do with it what you will.

[Amy Robach]

Exactly. And that's what we had been complaining about as we watched the prosecution put on its case for the last two weeks. And I saw, I thought where they were headed and then they never would bring it home. And I was asking myself, as a juror, you're questioning, why am I hearing about this? What's the importance or significance of this? How are you tying this to intentional premeditated murder? And I was confused and I had an idea of maybe where the prosecutors were headed, but they never told us. And I've never seen that before. I understand they get the witness to take you down a path and you're following along, and then they bring it home with either the follow up question or just in the way they continue the line of questioning. You understand what they're trying to prove? I was confused for most of the prosecution's case.

[TJ Holmes]

And so Tipton, who, from the very first word that came out of his mouth, an opening statement, you and I looked at each other and said, oh boy, he's gonna be a good one. And we saw that because it's not just a matter of legal. There's a presentation and almost a colloquial way he talks. That works, that some will tell you works with jurors.

[Amy Robach]

You pay attention, you sit up. When he speaks. He is an amazing speaker, an orator. Obviously, he's, he knows what he's doing. But I would expect that from most trial attorneys, and I just would say it is maybe unfair, but you do compare and, and when he speaks, you listen. When he tells a story, you pay attention. That hasn't been the case for me with the prosecution.

[TJ Holmes]

All right, folks, so we'll tell you where we are right now. We are the. As we speak, closing arguments continue. Tipton on the defense side has finished the prosecution as we speak. We're recording this a little before lunchtime, but court started this morning. Jurors got part of their instruction, then the closing arguments started. They are then going to get some final instructions from this judge today. And so we believe she will have them start deliberating if it gets too late. Maybe she just sends them home and they start fresh on Monday, which some of them might appreciate doing that, sleep on it over the weekend. But that is where we are in the process today. So Tipton gets up, Robes, and he. It seems odd. Obviously, we don't have a dog in the fight, and we have. But we have watched almost every second of this trial. So I feel like we have a good sense of how it's going to.

[Amy Robach]

Yes. And look, this is. And we've heard from everyone and we've said this throughout our coverage, that every attorney agrees this is a. Almost. It feels like, impossible case to defend, because here you have a defendant who has admitted to dismembering and disposing of his wife's body, has admitted to lying to police. It's clear he manipulated investigators and everyone around him. So how is this guy believable when he says, oopsie, I just walked in on my wife's dead body and panicked. But I. I am impressed, and I have, and we both have been impressed by Tipton's ability to cast some doubt. One of the big lines that stood out to me this morning, he said one statement, and it. And it sat with me. Nothing violent happened in that house. And then he went on in great detail to talk about the lack of.

[TJ Holmes]

Evidence, you know, and he brought it home. We listened to it all, and we had to piece it together because, quite frankly, the prosecution was doing this. So we had to figure out, okay, they're saying this. So does this mean this? So we had to figure it out. He put it together today for the jurors and reminded them, I mean, this is for real. If something so violent happened in that house. You telling me he cleaned up so well that your investigators for days could find nothing in the bedroom or the living room? We watch a lot of True Crime. They can't ever clean everything.

[Amy Robach]

And he pointed out to the fact that obviously they found some blood evidence of Anna Walsh in the basement. He's like, you know, he was trying to clean the basement because his searches specifically say how to clean blood out of the basement, cement floor and all of that. So he said, if he was so good at cleaning the bathroom and the bedroom and the other areas of the house, how is it that he wasn't as good at cleaning up the basement? Those two things don't make sense.

[TJ Holmes]

Okay, you can take that from a legal argument of what that means. You can have lawyers argue about that, or what does that mean to a juror? When. When I hear that, I mean, look, Robes, the circumstances and his searches. Holy hell. I was like, how's he going to get around this?

[Amy Robach]

It felt insurmountable.

[TJ Holmes]

When you were hearing them, his attorneys have given doubt. There is Some doubt about how this woman died, we don't know. But neither side has proven how she died. And if you didn't prove how she died, that means you didn't prove she was killed. And if you didn't prove she was killed, Robes, what is the jury going to do with this case?

[Amy Robach]

It's the question of how much does common sense play a role versus irrefutable evidence and facts versus what actually is reasonable doubt. And that is what the jury is going to have to figure out. And that is part of the difficulty of this case. But I'm impressed that there isn't. There is even going to potentially be a difficult decision for the jurors because it seemed as though when we started this, it was. I know prosecutors hate to hear this word because it. They don't want to jinx themselves, but it did appear to be a slam dunk case.

[TJ Holmes]

Yeah. Before reasonable doubt was created for us. I didn't have it when they started last week on this trial, I was like, this, dude, those searches are insane. It's almost, you say common sense, Somebody sits and tells you this story. Well, this is what happened on that night. Like, come on, bro, what'd you do to your wife? Yes, obviously you're going to say that that feels commonsensical until you get somebody like Larry Tipton to come in and give you reasonable doubt.

[Amy Robach]

And during the closing arguments that he made, Tipton pointed out those searches, and he had to. And I'm glad he addressed them, because to have ignored them or something like would have been terrible. So he actually said, okay, let's talk about these awful, horrible, unthinkable searches. He asks the jurors then, and you appreciated this when he created this testimony to consider the timing the searches about mur and cleanup occurred six hours after Anna Walsh died. And he said, consider that the first search was just how to get rid of a body. And when he said, you get search results that show funeral plots and coffins and basic things when someone is about to be disposed of in a legal, technical way, of course, you're just gonna get those basic results. So he had to use the word murder. Six hours later, he's claiming, the defense is claiming, because all the other searches weren't giving him the information he needed.

[TJ Holmes]

Stop there.

[Amy Robach]

Is that ridiculous to think I hadn't considered it beforehand?

[TJ Holmes]

Because you know what he said to the jurors? He said, we've all done that before. We had to get more specific in our searches. When he said that, like, oh, yeah, I guess. I guess I have had to do that before. Right.

[Amy Robach]

He's.

[TJ Holmes]

He's creating something in your mind that doesn't make you abandon common sense. It just gives you some kind of reasonable doubt. A big part, several lines. We're going to go through a few of the things he said but wrote. The. The passion, sympathy and anger when he told them, you cannot convict this man because you have sympathy for Anna Wash or because you have anger at Brian Walsh. That was effective because you do leave this whole thing like, wow, what a. What a jerk. He did this. He did this. He's convicted of this crime. You don't just be mad at him. You can't convict him because you're mad. And you can't convict him because you've learned about her, how hard she worked, how great of a mother she was. You heard all these wonderful things and you're sympathetic. I thought that was effective.

[Amy Robach]

I did, too. And he also really brought home this idea that the prosecution did not prove motive. So they don't have a body. They can't tell you how Anna Walsh died, but they also cannot give you a actual reason that is provable as to why Brian Walsh killed her. And of course, they were trying to say that Brian Walsh. And they have been saying that Brian Walsh did. Knew about Anna Walsh's affair with her lover and Will Fasto. And they claim that everything he did, including saying he left his. Lost his cell phone, was all premeditated. But I have to say, Larry Tipton did a great job saying they have not proven premeditation. They have not proven a motive. And I kind of have to agree with him on that because.

[TJ Holmes]

Right. It was supposed to be the affair or it was money. Right. I. I haven't seen. Well, I. I watched this. I'm putting myself in the position of a juror. Do I know for sure that he knew about the affair? No, I do not. Do I know for sure that they had some financial money issue and that was the reason he killed her? No, I. Those two things are off the table. So now as a juror, I'm looking, well, why did he kill her? Like I want to believe he killed her. Even if you believe he killed her, why did he kill her? That's gonna. That's gonna trip them up, since they trip up. But that has gotta be a point of even internal contention for each juror, much less 12 sitting around a table.

[Amy Robach]

And it was interesting to that point about having the 12 people who are now going to have to deliberate with one another and get on the same page you heard Latipton tell the jury very early on in his statement, like, don't be swayed. Basically, if you believe that, you know, he was literally talking to the individual juror, that if you have any doubt or you don't think that makes sense or you don't think this was proven, you cannot be swayed by others. I mean, he really. He needs one juror, and it was very obvious he knows he needs one juror, and he was trying to reach out to maybe whoever that one juror is. To hold true to your convictions, to believe what you feel in your heart, to not be swayed into thinking something other than what you feel is correct.

[TJ Holmes]

He might already even know who the one is. They pay attention to that jury box, how they're reacting, how they're moving, who's taking the most notes, who gets emotional. We always hear about that. And you're right. He only needs one. If I had to make a prediction, I am mistrial in this thing right now.

[Amy Robach]

Hungary.

[TJ Holmes]

Absolutely. I absolutely would say that, because it's cre. I cannot believe I'm saying it. But if they came back not guilty, I would go, I don't know about that. They came back guilty, I would say I don't know about that. So if there is. If you're hung up. Only as a legal matter, we have no dog in this fight. This has been a fascinating one to watch. Robes. But, folks, stay with us. When we come back, we are going to share with you the other very powerful line that Larry Tipton used at the end of his closing argument. And his other most effective argument he made was based around the word cherry picking. Stay here.

[Ed Helms]

Hey, everyone. Ed Helms here.

[Kal Penn]

And hi, I'm Kal Penn, and we're the hosts of Irsay, The Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club.

[Ed Helms]

This week on the podcast, I am sitting down with Jenny Garth, host of the iHeart podcast. I choose me to discuss the new Audible adaptation of the timeless Jane Austen classic Pride and Prejudice. This is not a trick question. There's no wrong answer. What role would I play?

[Amy Robach]

You know what?

[Podcast Announcer]

I can see you as Mr. Darcy.

[Amy Robach]

You got a little Colin Firth.

[Ed Helms]

Okay, that's really sweet. I appreciate that, but are you sure I'm not the dad? I'm not Mr. Bennett.

[TJ Holmes]

Here.

[Ed Helms]

Listen to Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audio Book Club on the iHeartradio app or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Pandora Jewelry Advertiser]

I don't know about you guys, but I love to buy gifts. I love it so much. I love it so much more than getting gifts. But the one thing that I do love, especially when it comes to my daughter, is getting matching things. I know it's such a cliche, but I love it so much. So I have the perfect brand for you. Pandora Jewelry can make their holiday unforgettable with a gift that says it all from Pandora Jewelry. A gift that tells a story and shows you know theirs that doesn't just sparkle but speaks. From new festive charms to forever rings and personal engravings, this season, give a gift that's perfectly theirs. Whether you're shopping for a shiny surprise for your significant other, matching bracelets to celebrate your friendship or or a heartfelt gift for a family member, say more this holiday season with Pandora. Shop [e-mail] or visit your closest Pandora store.

[Amy Robach]

A GLP one helped you lose weight, but now you're noticing unwanted facial changes?

[TJ Holmes]

Yeah, the weight came off, but facial volume loss and dull sagging skin are making you look older. That's where the next phase of your weight loss journey comes in.

[Amy Robach]

There's before weight loss, after weight loss, and then the after.

[TJ Holmes]

Yeah, help restore and refresh your facial skin and reclaim your natural looking youthful glow.

[Amy Robach]

To learn more, visit faceafterweightloss.com that's faceafterweightloss.com.

[Ryan Reynolds]

Hey, Ryan Reynolds here wishing you a very happy half off holiday because right now Mint Mobile is offering you the gift of 50% off unlimited. To be clear, that's half price, not half the service. Mint is still premium unlimited wireless for a great price. So that means a half day. Yeah, give it a [e-mail] Switch upfront.

[Amy Robach]

Payment of $45 for a three month plan equivalent to $15 per month required new customer offer for first three months only.

[Podcast Announcer]

Speed slow 135 gigabytes of network's busy.

[Amy Robach]

Taxes and fees extra see mintmobile.com Busy.

[Prolon Advertiser]

Work weeks can leave you feeling drained. Prolon's five day fasting mimicking diet works at the cellular level to rejuvenate you from the inside out, providing real results that include fat focused, sustainable weight loss with no injection needed. NextGen builds on the original Prologue with 100% organic soups and teas, a richer taste and ready to eat meals. Developed at USC's Longevity Institute and backed by top medical centers, Prolon supports biological age reduction, metabolic health, skin appearance, fat loss and energy. Get 15% off plus a $40 bonus gift when you subscribe at prolonlife.com iheartra that's prolonlife.com iheart.

[TJ Holmes]

All right folks, we continue here now in the Brian Walsh trial, which robes, I think pretty surprisingly. I don't want to go as far as, say, shockingly, but maybe it's wrapping up today. Closing arguments. We did not expect to be two weeks in and this thing be wrapping up.

[Amy Robach]

There have been a lot of shocking elements of this case. Yes. How quickly they've gotten through everything. Also, the fact that the defense has made such a strong argument on behalf of Brian Walsh, that was completely shocking to me. And the fact that they chose not to put on one witness, not one person. We understand why they didn't put on Brian Walsh, but I was shocked. And so were a lot of other legal experts that no one, they called no one a la Sean Diddy Combs style. Like, we feel so good about our case and the prosecution, we think did such a poor job, we don't even need to put anybody up. That was shocking. So, yeah, there have been a lot of surprising elements of this case throughout.

[TJ Holmes]

That was very. A very confident move. I think we were shocked. Our jaws dropped when Diddy didn't put on any witnesses, and it worked out beautifully for him. And like our friends, our legal friends told us, you do that because you think you've already won. There's nothing else for them to do. So I don't know how confident they feel. I started at the top about us feeling seen. Right. This is something you have been absolutely screaming about during the entire prosecution case, is that they're giving you, you know, what, all the. The searches even, right. She had the witness up there. She was in very monotone and said, look at file 2, 9 da da da da. Will you read that entry? He would read the search and then she'd move on to the next one. These were some of the most devastating lines and searches. Blood on a knife, DNA cleaning up blood, cleaning up after a murder, hacksawing a body, all these things. And it was delivered in such a monotone way. And then when it was over, it was just over. And you had a feeling about this throughout, and Larry Tipton pointed it out today, is that they are just throwing thousands of points of data at you and here's his word, telling you, but not telling you what, what to think about it.

[Amy Robach]

That was crazy to me. It they. It was as if the prosecution didn't want to lead the jury. Like, that's your job. You can't lead a witness, but you're actually supposed to lead the jury and tell them what to think and show them why they should think this. And she didn't do that. Yes, there was information yes, there was evidence. Yes, there was really compelling testimony. But when you don't connect the dots for the jurors and expect them to do that on their own, to me, they. That made no sense.

[TJ Holmes]

And again, we are not in any way, shape or form critical of these career lawyers, prosecutors. They do this for a living. They know what they're doing. What all we can speak on as observers, putting ourselves in the position of a juror.

[Amy Robach]

That's. Yeah.

[TJ Holmes]

And our observation in watching this is that we are walking away, not really sure of the prosecution case. I don't know. What is the theory of how she died? She died violently. What's the. I see your mouth is up.

[Amy Robach]

You know what? Larry Tipton even made a point to say, that knife they talk so much about, they didn't even care about it enough to even like do a follow up test on whether or not it actually was blood. And they didn't confirm whose DNA was on the blood. That's how little they cared about that knife that they kept throwing in your face. So he made excellent points. And look, we are. And look, we've made it very clear we're not legal experts, but we have sat through many trials, babe. I have sat through so many murder cases, so have you. In local news, cable news, network news. So we do have some perspective. And it was shocking, at least from our perspective. What the prosecutors chose to leave to the discretion of jurors, that was confusing to me.

[TJ Holmes]

This might be a part of their strategy and it did exactly what they wanted to do. I don't know. But this is where we're left. He rapped with this and, you know, he's being very good and punching his words and punching his lines when needed, but he made a point at the end that there's no evidence. You don't have evidence. You got evidence that he lied to police. You got evidence that he disposed of a body.

[Amy Robach]

And he acknowledged all of that, all of it.

[TJ Holmes]

There's no evidence of a murder. And what he said was, there's no evidence of anything but love. And when he said, worked on me in the moment because he had just framed robes, all these other things that Brian Walsh did that seemingly were of a guy who loved his wife and was planning for a future with his wife. Now, was it all just to set up an alibi or something? Possibly, I don't know. But the evidence and things he was doing way before January 1st, the day she died, I mean, the dinner they talked about that he set up and he lied to his parole officer. About where he was going to be because he wanted to take his wife to dinner. It was important enough for that. That was.

[Amy Robach]

And that poor. And that was the first time I actually heard that dot connected because I was confused why the prosecution had his parole officer, whoever was supposed to be monitoring him and detailing clearly. He said he was doing something that he wasn't going to do. Why would he do that? She didn't offer a reason. And other than he was not being truthful. But I needed to understand why he wasn't being truthful. And so then when the defense filled in the blank, he was wanting to take his wife out to dinner, which he isn't allowed to do while under house arrest. Now, you're the first person who's given me a reason why he was untruthful. And yes, we heard from Tipton saying there is no evidence in all of the digital data. And obviously this is a man who wasn't thinking about his digital footprint because he wouldn't have made all those searches if he was thinking about his digital footprint. But nowhere in any of that did it show that he saw anything between Anna Walsh and William Fasto. He said there's no evidence, evidence that he intended to kill his wife. There is no evidence that he premeditated this murder whatsoever. And he said Mr. Walsh is not guilty.

[TJ Holmes]

Well, folks, this is how it goes, right? Good, Good lawyering has us in this place. We're going to listen to the prosecution. We might come back and say, oh, they got him. They really brought it home. We will follow up and we will be letting you all know what happens later in the day. We will give you an episode having to do with the prosecution closing statement. And we expect the jury to get the case today. This is fascinating. I can't believe two weeks. Well, folks, we appreciate you being along the way with us on this trial. And stay with us, our updates, top right corner of that Apple podcast app, our show page. It says follow. Click that button and the updates will come to you automatically. You don't have to go searching for them. We always appreciate you spending some time with us. From my dear Amy Robach. I'm TJ Holmes. We'll talk to you all soon.

[Amy Robach]

Foreign.

[Kal Penn]

Hey, audiobook lovers, I'm Cal Penn.

[Ed Helms]

I'm Ed Helms.

[Kal Penn]

Ed and I are inviting you to join the best sounding book club you've ever heard with our new podcast, Irsay The Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club.

[Ed Helms]

Each week we sit down with your favorite iHeart podcast hosts and some very special guests to Discuss the latest and greatest audiobooks from Audible.

[Kal Penn]

Listen to hearsay on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Follow Irsay and start listening on the free iHeartradio app today.

[Amy Robach]

Okay, only 10 more presents to wrap. You're almost at the finish line, but first. There blast 1. Enjoy a coca Cola for a pause that refreshes.

[Ulta Beauty Advertiser]

Hear that? It's holiday cheer arriving at Ulta Beauty with gifts for everyone on your list. Treat them to fan favorite gift sets from Charlotte Tilbury and Peach and Lily. Go all out with timeless fragrances from ysl, Ariana Grande and Carolina Herrera, and you can never go wrong with an Ulta Beauty gift card. Head to Ulta Beauty for gifts that make the holidays brighter and even more beautiful. Ulta Beauty gifting happens here.

[BlackRock iShares Advertiser]

With Valley from Ishares. You get access to both monthly income and growth potential in one simple ETF.

[TJ Holmes]

It's the best of both worlds.

[BlackRock iShares Advertiser]

Discover Bali iShares Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF iShares the market is yours. Visit www.ishares.com to view perspectives for investment objectives, risks, fees, expenses and other information that you should read and consider carefully before investing. Risks include principal loss and the use of derivatives, which could increase risks and volatility. Monthly income is not guaranteed. Prepared by BlackRock Investments, LLC.

[Podcast Announcer]

Saks Off 5th is revealing the season's most wanted holiday steals. Whether you're gifting someone on your list or treating yourself to a designer score, find deals on McQueen, Valentino, Versace, Stuart Weitzman and more at up to 70% off every day, outshine at every event and outsmart your budget. From shimmer ready party looks to luxe layers and cozy giftable Accessories, Saks off 5th is your secret source for celebrating in style. Your holiday shopping mission starts [e-mail] or a Saks off 5th store near you. This is an iHeart podcast. Guaranteed Human.