Loading summary
Host
This is an iHeart podcast.
Justin Richmond
This is Justin Richmond from Broken Record. Are you the kind of person who sets standards for themselves? Like, personally, I told myself if the Lakers lose their do or die game five, I wouldn't let it impact my mood at home with family. The standard Lexus has set for themselves is to experience amazing. Lexus measures success by the feelings and emotions evoked in a driver, like exhilaration and joy. Amazing can only be achieved by knowing people on a deeper level. The standard of amazing results in machines that make you feel more human. Because a car that doesn't make you feel something is a car that stops short of amazing Experience. Amazing at your Lexus dealer.
Host
I've never felt like this before. It's like you just get me. I feel like my true self with you. Does that sound crazy? And it doesn't hurt that you're gorgeous. Okay, that's it. I'm taking you home with me. I mean, you can't find shoes this good just anywhere. Find a shoe for every you from brands you love, like Birkenstock, Nike, Adidas and more at your dsw store or dsw.com did you know someone actually brought back a dire wolf? Actually reviving the species like Game of Thrones? Dire wolf. It's real.
Dr. Patrick McGrath
Yeah.
Co-Host
The company is called Colossal, and the CEO, Ben Lam, is also working on bringing back the woolly mammoth. Yeah. What are you up to, fellas? You know, just hanging out, Reversing extinction. Yeah, apparently Tom Brady is one of their investors and they just hit a $10 billion valuation.
Host
The actual animal, ancient DNA, real scientists, and a real living creature walking around. It's wild. And we are officially living in an alternate universe. It's Megan.
Co-Host
Are you ready for hashtag Megan?
Advertiser
Summer.
Host
Megan.
Co-Host
Megan.
Host
Megan.
Co-Host
Megan.
Advertiser
Megan.
Host
Would you prefer that I give you a printout that you your own pace? Megan? Yes, it's me. What a shock.
Advertiser
Etc on June 27.
Justin Richmond
She is a smoking hot warrior princess.
Host
All right, meat sacks, let's get to work. Are you going to stand in my way?
Advertiser
The BE is back.
Host
Do you think you learned your lesson the first time? Megan. Megan 2.0 only in theaters June 27th with APT13. Now more than ever, Lowe's knows you don't just want a low price, you.
Advertiser
Want the lowest price.
Host
And with our lowest price guarantee, you.
Advertiser
Can count on us for competitive prices on all your home improvement projects. If you find a qualifying lower price somewhere else on the same item, we'll match it Lowe's. We help you save price. Match applies to same item Current price at qualifying retailers. Exclusions and terms apply. Learn how we'll match price@lowes.com lowest price guarantee.
Co-Host
Hey there, folks. It is Monday, June 23rd. This is the 7th and now we're told, the final week of testimony in the Diddy trial. Welcome to this Diddy update episode of Amy and tj. We've been keeping you updated throughout. It doesn't seem like robes now. We have much longer to go. We got a better idea of the timeline of this trial. And your honor, the defense calls no one.
Host
Right. Exactly. So that was the breaking news this morning. We were all waiting in anticipation for who the defense might call to the witness stand and how long they might go. We had heard it could take one or two days, so we didn't figure there'd be many people who would be testifying. But it turns out no one is going to be testifying yet. The defense has said it will not call any witnesses to the stand. And that means you. One can assume or presume that they believe they have made their case. They have made their defense of Sha Diddy Combs in their cross examinations of the prosecution's witnesses.
Co-Host
I'm still blown away by what they're saying they're going to do. So this, the witness is on the stand for the prosecution, their final one, this Homeland Security agent, He is going to be up there until the end of the day, and they expect him to go ropes into tomorrow. The defense says they will then be done tomorrow. They're not even taking a full day to defend Diddy. That blows my mind.
Host
It's bold. It's really bold. It's super confident. And I can see how perhaps that would send a message to the jury because everyone expects someone at least to have one witness or a few witnesses to testify in your defense. The fact that they're not calling anyone actually could be a brilliant move in terms of what the jury was expecting, because they're thinking, well, hell, if they don't need to call anyone, they must have proven their case. I mean, I can see how that would create a certain mindset in a jury because it is not. I mean, it happens. It's not unprecedented by any means. I mean, this. This is something that happens quite often. But in a case this big, with the stakes so high, I mean, we all remember Diddy is facing life in prison. This is not a couple years. This isn't just a few offenses. This is serious, significant stuff where his life is on the line. So to not call any witnesses is bold. And I, you know, it could be brilliant. We'll only know after the jury renders its verdict.
Co-Host
Bold, brilliant. It could be the exact right move. Look, we are. We've watched a bunch of trials, but we are not legal experts at all. These folks know what they're doing is what I generally find. And if somebody like Diddy, who has his resources, he is, he has the.
Host
Best lawyers with names like Garagos and Shapiro, his.
Co-Host
I mean, history makers in this country in a lot of legal and celebrity cases, they know what they're doing, so they're making the right, the best. And you better sure believe Diddy signs off on this defense and how this is going. But they said they're going to present a defense of just a few items of evidence and exhibits. I don't know how earth shattering those could be, but that's their defense. Here you go. Here's our homework. And that's it.
Host
Yeah, I mean, they did spend days cross examining the star witnesses, Cassie Ventura and Jane. So certainly they did, you could say, spend. They spent days with presenting their case through the cross examination of the prosecution's witness. And it may be that they don't even have a witness to call to refute any of the claims. And the people who know, the people who were there to testify were the people that the prosecution already called. So who else would they bring on the stand? I mean, people had wondered if KK would be coming up, if one of his bodyguards would be coming up. But many of them might feel like, who knows the reasoning behind it? But they made the choice not to bring anyone up to refute anything. They feel like they did their job in showing. And frankly, they did discredit quite a bit of what Jane had to say, or even Cassie. When you. At least it brings a question in the juror's mind when you hear them say, I didn't want to do it. I was coerced to do it. I had a financial reason why I had to do it. And then you have texts from them saying, I can't wait to be with you. I can't wait to do some freaky stuff with you. It's hard. And that's so. Certainly casts doubt in terms of what the state or. Sorry, I always say the state. In terms of what the feds are trying to prove.
Co-Host
Do moments matter? Do moments stand out for a jury that could possibly sway them one way or another? I say moments. It seems like the defense had more than the prosecution. The Perry Mason moment that we will never forget. It seemed like they made more headway sometimes than the prosecution seems to have. Does that matter, you think? If the margins are that slim, you were just talking about the psychology. It might get into their brains. Like, wait, they didn't present any witnesses. So in that same vein, is it possible that moments matter throughout the trial to the jury?
Host
Moments absolutely matter. The Perry Mason moment was pivotal. And there were several slightly less perhaps like explosive moments in that, but there were plenty of them. When they had witnesses go back and read texts that were omitted, and the text actually showed a very different vein of motivation for why these women might have participated. It was incredibly damning, I believe, to the prosecution's case when the defense had some of these other texts read, that frankly flew in the face of what we heard in testimony from these women. So it's. This is, you know what? And just the psychology of life. Isn't confidence so powerful? And by not calling any witnesses, that is so confident. That is so confident.
Co-Host
How did I forget you? I'm sitting here and I'm like, oh my goodness, I forgot I had this. I reached out to a prosecutor friend of ours.
Host
Okay.
Co-Host
That's all I'll say. Just because that was my question. Why on guide's earth? I said, please help me understand why the defense in the Diddy trial would not call any witnesses. The response, and I quote, because they think they have won already and they may have.
Justin Richmond
Wow.
Host
Wow. You know, the prosecution has called 34 witnesses to the stand and the final one is on the stand today trying to connect the dots summarizing these freak offs, going through explicit videos, going through the paid receipts that Diddy has had, purchased plane tickets for some of these women and some of these male escorts to attend these parties. My question is, okay, so he paid for these folks to participate in these freak offs around the country. So crossing state lines. But if they went there willingly, if they weren't coerced, if you can even call into question that they may have wanted to do it at the time and regretted it later. Any seed of doubt about any of that throws the prosecution's argument out the window. Because they need the jury to believe that these women and maybe even these escorts didn't really want to be there and felt they had to.
Co-Host
What is the charge again? I have to look at these. How's that? To remind? I have the note in here.
Host
I've got it. Okay. Yeah, he's pleaded not guilty to racketeering conspiracy.
Co-Host
That's the big one. He could get life for that one.
Host
Correct. Two counts of sex trafficking by force.
Co-Host
Sex trafficking that's what it is.
Host
By force. And the interesting thing about that is in fact what they were going over today and on Friday with this Homeland Security agent, he, he was actually going through the text messages of Cassie and Jane where they at first told kk, his chief of staff, I don't want to go. He's just using me. I don't want to be there. But then after talking to Diddy, they decided to come. They made the choice to come. So I'm just confused how that would be. Force. Two counts of sex trafficking by force, then fraud or coercion. Oh, sorry, I, I skipped it. Two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion.
Co-Host
Now one of those do carry a 15 year minimum.
Host
Okay, so force, fraud or coercion. And then he's also facing two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution.
Co-Host
And those are only, those are a maximum of 10 years. So I guess that would be the lesser charge if he gets convicted of that. But how is he not for prostitution. To engage in prostitution. So they have evidence that he paid to have a male escort come to New York for a freak off. Is that done deal?
Host
That seems like that's a done deal to me. The two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, just from my non legal mind and what I've witnessed and what I've read, it seems like they kind of nailed that one. They have the receipts, they have the proof, they have the videos. And clearly the male escorts who were engaged in sex that you could clearly see on the videotape were clearly paid. So. And many times, yes, they crossed state lines. So.
Dr. Patrick McGrath
What if I told you that right now millions of people are living with a debilitating condition that's so misunderstood, many of them don't even know that they have it. Condition is Obsessive compulsive disorder or OCD. I'm Dr. Patrick McGrath, the chief clinical officer of NOCD. And in the 25 years I've been treating OCD, I've met so many people who are suffering from the condition in silence, unaware of just what it was. OCD can create overwhelming anxiety and fear around what you value most, make you question your identity, beliefs and morals, and drive you to perform mentally and physically draining compulsions or rituals. Over my career, I've seen just how devastating OCD can be when it's left untreated. But help is available. That's where NOCD comes in. NOCD is the world's largest virtual therapy provider for obsessive compulsive disorder. Our licensed therapists are Trained in exposure and response prevention therapy, a specialized treatment proven to be incredibly effective for OCD. So visit nocd.com to schedule a free 15 minute call with our team.
Advertiser
That's nocd.com you're great at protecting your own personal information. You probably even use things like two factor authentication, strong passwords and a vpn. But as much as you try to be in control of how your information is protected, there are lots of places that also have it and they might not be as careful as you are. That's why LifeLock monitors millions of data points every second for identity threats. If your identity is stolen, a LifeLock US based restoration specialist will help solve identity theft issues on your behalf, Guaranteed or your money back. Plus, all LifeLock plans are backed by the million dollar protection package, meaning LifeLock will reimburse you up to the limits of your plan if you lose money due to identity theft. You might not be able to control how others handle your personal information, but you can help protect it. With LifeLock, save up to 40% your first year. Call 1-800-LIFELOCK and use promo code IHEART or go to lifelock.com iheart for 40% off. Terms apply.
Host
Did you know someone actually brought back a dire wolf and actually reviving the species? Like Game of Thrones direwolf? It's real.
Dr. Patrick McGrath
Yeah.
Co-Host
The company is called Colossal and the CEO, Ben Lamb is also working on bringing back the woolly mammoth. Yeah. What are you up to, fellas? You know, just hanging out, reversing extinction. Yeah. Apparently Tom Brady is one of their investors and they just hit a $10 billion valuation.
Host
The actual animal, ancient DNA, real scientists, and a real living creature walking around. It's wild. And we are officially living in an alternate universe.
Advertiser
As a parent, you wear many hats. At dinner, you're the chef. When your kids play, you're the ref. And let's face it, you're basically a full time chauffeur. Fortunately, when it's time to wear your teacher hat, Abeka makes things easy. Our proven flexible homeschool curriculum is designed to let your kids retain and build on the knowledge they acquire, setting them up for success later in life. Abeka learning for life begins with the right homeschool education.
Host
Learn more at abekahomeschool.com@amica insurance, we know.
Co-Host
It'S more than just a house.
Host
It's your home.
Co-Host
The place that's filled with memories.
Justin Richmond
The early days of figuring it out.
Co-Host
To the later years of still figuring it out. For the place you've put down roots. Trust Amica Home Insurance. Amica Empathy is our best policy. What was the name of the one the escort website?
Host
Wait, oh, oh, it was Cowboys for Angels. Cowboys for Angels or Angels for Cowboys?
Co-Host
No, you got it right.
Host
Cowboys for Angels.
Co-Host
Cowboys for Angels. So that company came out in testimony today, the same day that he was such a long term customer that he wanted a discount, that he was upset with them for raising their rates. And they have the communication between him and the Cowboys for Angels agency. His line is stop raising my rate. I am a long timer. They have that from him to Cowboys for Angels.
Host
Cowboys for Angels. Technically, I imagine to be a legal business, would have to just say, hey, these are just escorts. These are just people who are there for your pleasure, not for sexual pleasure, but just to be there and to accompany you and wherever you want to go and whatever you want to do. But clearly they're not acknowledging that this is for sex. But clearly we have the videos that show that is in fact what happened.
Co-Host
Okay, speaking of the legal part of that, so what if all he was doing was hiring an escort to come to New York, New York and be an escort to escort him or someone else around and lo and behold, sex ended up happening? Is that a legal argument?
Host
I think it could be. Geez, now that you just said that, I thought, oh, maybe that is possible because they could say the escort decided after hanging out for a while that just, you know, because he liked everybody, he just, wow, maybe he was horny, maybe he just wanted to have sex. But the, the payment was specifically for companionship, not for sex.
Co-Host
That's how they get around it.
Host
You know what, possibly I, that just was a light bulb that went off in your head and then. Yes, I concur. That does sound reasonable in terms of a legal explanation to get around the actual charge. I think, look, we're not going to get a witness now for the defense, but we will hear from the defense attorneys and we will hear. We now know closing arguments are scheduled for Thursday. Correct. And so this case, this seven week long case with 34 witnesses and lots of graphic videos and a tremendous amount of jaw dropping testimony is all going to be in the hands of the jury as early as Thursday afternoon, perhaps even again.
Co-Host
The. They have a conference on Wednesday. The judge says for the attorneys and judge to go over the jury instructions. I have been a part and seen jury instructions that go half a day.
Host
Yeah, that's true.
Co-Host
It does, it goes, it takes a while. So.
Host
And in this case, probably definitely going to take a very long time. I have you know, we have as much as we can sitting in our apartment monitoring everything. Still, I would need to be redirected and shown what is what and what means this and what's the level of proof. I mean, I. It's mind blowing. You're right. The judge could have instructions for a half a day, and I don't know, the defense and the prosecution, who knows how long they'll take.
Co-Host
Yeah, they read, though. Yeah, they make sure they read every single line of the instructions. It's almost a manual you get when you buy a new appliance and he's reading through and you're trying to follow what all this stuff means. Now, I have no, never robes and tell me if you have been a part of jury instructions that were quick.
Host
No, I have not.
Co-Host
No, it's never a quick process.
Host
The jury. The truth is. Well, most of the trials, I would imagine all of the trials I know that I have actually personally witnessed have been for murder. So people's lives are on the line and they want to make sure that all the T's are crossed, all the I's are dotted. They want to make sure the jury knows exactly what they have to do and, and what the burden of proof is. That that is the gray area. What is reasonable doubt.
Co-Host
There's gonna be some fighting in between the attorneys about the language that goes. And they always are so, so particular about what types of language, type of language can go into those things. Because after that, the, the, the defense, all the attorneys have no more say. Nobody can do anything. It's over. You can't make any other case once they go into that jury room. So this is their last chance to have some kind of. Of an influence on the jury. The closing arguments, is it who goes first? I can't remember. Is it prosecution, defense, and then prosecution again?
Host
I think, See, I think I thought the defense had the last word. I need to look this up.
Co-Host
I cannot do this. This is embarrassing.
Host
One of us is correct.
Co-Host
We should know. Because I used to remember thinking that it wasn't fair that whoever went last got to go last.
Host
Of course, that's like everyone would want to go last in this for sure.
Co-Host
I thought the prosecution got to go last.
Host
I'm looking this up right now. But in terms of the jury, we ended up only losing one juror throughout. We thought at one point we might lose three jurors, but we only ended up losing one juror. And the alternates are still there, but that's kind of moot now, right? Do they get to Participate in the actual jury deliberations or be a part of it if something were to happen.
Co-Host
You know what? I actually don't know that. While you're over there Googling stuff, look that up. To do, alternates need to be in the deliberating room, so I guess it's possible they could start deliberating and something happens with a juror. Isn't that possible? Did you get the answer?
Host
I got the answer for the court cases. And it's. You're always right. Why do I even try to pretend like I might have something that is correct over you? All right. In court cases, the party with the burden of proof generally gets the last word. This is usually the prosecution in criminal cases and the plaintiff in civil cases. They get the opportunity for a closing argument or a rebuttal after the opposing side has presented its case.
Co-Host
And I always thought that was unfair. My life is on the line. I should get the last word. I always. That's why I remember it. I thought that was wild, but yeah. So the prosecution will get the last word before they all get to go in. I am reading something here. I know you. Did you find it already?
Host
Yes.
Co-Host
Okay, go ahead.
Host
About alternate jurors.
Justin Richmond
Yes.
Host
So there were six alternate jurors. I think we're down to five alternate jurors because the. One of the alternate jurors became actually a member of the jury. So. No. Alternate jurors generally do not participate in jury deliberations unless a regular juror is unable to continue serving. If an alternate juror replaces a regular juror during deliberations, the court will then instruct the jury to begin deliberations anew. So if anything happens during the actual deliberation and some juror has to leave, they can actually appoint an alternate to come step in. But then they have to start all over again. So let's hope that doesn't happen. But I'm so happy we were able to answer our own questions in this podcast. I'm sure everybody was on the edge of their seats waiting for the answer, or they're like, I already know that, dummy.
Co-Host
Everybody was waiting on the edge of their seats. I. I only bring it up, and it shouldn't be a big deal, but the jury has been a little weird. Been some. Some wonky stuff going on with this jury at times and some questions. One got kicked off, one was about to get kicked off, another one got sick. It's just been some stuff. One of them was nodding. It did. I know.
Host
And a black juror was replaced by a White juror. So, you know, there are all Westchester. From Westchester, from the Bronx to Westchester.
Co-Host
It's so. It's so. That's why I just hold my breath when it comes to. To this particular jury. But I just can't believe this is it. When I heard they were only going to. When they said that the prosecution is going to rest on Tuesday. The defense is going to rest on Tuesday.
Host
That's wild. Again, bold and possibly brilliant.
Co-Host
The best in the business are defending him so they know what they're doing. He's not going to get a better defense than this or better strategy. Turn on a TV somewhere today and you'll have somebody criticizing this is some legal expert doing this and that, some legal analyst. Da, da, da, da. And you know what? When he is found not guilty on something, they'll come back on. And what will be their excuse then?
Host
Well, you know, perhaps they knew more than we did or they believed something that we didn't realize. Who knows? But it will be fascinating. And, you know, in a weird way, it's. We've been so glued to every word, every bit of testimony. To think that it's all coming to an end kind of feels strange and like, okay, here it is. And I wonder what Diddy is feeling right now. If he feels confident, if he's, you know, all of the folks or all of the reporters in the courtroom have reported on him being actively involved, like leaning forward, watching the monitor, reading. Like they get a testimony, they have the words of. So he doesn't miss anything. I mean, he has been very, very, very a huge part of this. And to your point, he obviously had to sign off on not calling any witnesses.
Co-Host
Remember, he has been in prison since last September.
Host
Wow.
Co-Host
And he could potentially either walk out of there in the next week, you could even argue, or he's going to find out he's going to prison for a long, long time. We should have that answer soon. I even thought about the possibility of mistrials and hung juries. I haven't even.
Host
Yeah, who knows that? I mean, there are. There are a million different. Not a million, but there are several different outcomes that could take place here, including he gets convicted on a lesser charge and gets credit for time served and isn't in prison for that long or maybe has already done his time. Who knows? But we will continue to watch everything that goes on in that lower Manhattan courtroom and bring you the very latest. And you know, the big bombshell today. The defense is not calling any witnesses. The defense will rest the same day. The prosecution does. So thank you so much for listening to us, everyone. We'll keep you updated, but in the meantime, hope you have a wonderful day today.
Justin Richmond
This is Justin Richmond from Broken Record. Are you the kind of person who sets standards for themselves? Like, personally, I told myself if the Lakers lose their do or die game five, I wouldn't let it impact my mood at home with family. The standard Lexus has set for themselves is to experience amazing. Lexus measures success by the feelings and emotions evoked in a driver, like exhilaration and joy. Amazing can only be achieved by knowing people on a deeper level. The standard of amazing results in machines that make you feel more human. Because a car that doesn't make you feel something is a car that stops short of amazing. Experience Amazing at your Lexus dealer Hey.
Dr. Patrick McGrath
It'S me, Ear Heart. Mind if I pick the next song? Listen Even though we're eating better, people who've had one heart attack are at higher risk of another. But Repatha Evolocumab plus a statin lowers LDL C, our bad cholesterol and our heart attack risk.
Co-Host
So let's talk to our doctor about Repatha.
Host
Do not take Repatha if you're allergic to it. Serious allergic reactions can occur. Get medical help right away if you have trouble breathing or swallowing swelling of the face, lips, tongue, throat or arms. Common side effects include runny nose, sore throat, common cold symptoms, flu or flu like symptoms, back pain, high blood sugar and redness pain or bruising at the injection site. View the important safety information in our banner. Listen to your heart. Ask your doctor about Repatha.
Advertiser
You're great at protecting your own personal information. You probably even use things like two factor authentication, strong passwords and a vpn. But as much as you try to be in control of how your information is protected, there are lots of places that also have it and they might not be as careful as you are. That's why LifeLock monitors millions of data points every second for identity threats. If your identity is stolen, a LifeLock US based restoration specialist will help solve identity theft issues on your behalf, guaranteed or your money back. Plus, all LifeLock plans are backed by the million dollar protection package, meaning LifeLock will reimburse you up to the limits of your plan. If you lose money due to identity theft, you might not be able to control how others handle your personal information, but you can help protect it with LifeLock. Save up to 40% your first year. Call 1-800-LIFELOCK and use promo code IHEART or go to lifelock.com iheart for 40% off terms apply.
Host
Did you know someone actually brought back a dire wolf? Actually reviving the species like Game of Thrones direwolf. It's real.
Dr. Patrick McGrath
Yeah.
Co-Host
The company is called Colossal, and the CEO, Ben Lamb, is also working on bringing back the woolly mammoth. Yeah. What are you up to, fellas? You know, just hanging out, reversing extinction. Yeah. Apparently Tom Brady is one of their investors and they just hit a $10 billion valuation.
Host
The actual animal, ancient DNA, real scientists, and a real living creature walking around. It's wild. And we are officially living in an alternate universe.
Advertiser
As a parent, you wear many hats. At dinner, you're the chef. When your kids play, you're the ref. And let's face it, you're basically a full time chauffeur. Fortunately, when it's time to wear your teacher hat, ABEKA makes things easy. Our proven, flexible homeschool curriculum is designed to let your kids retain and build on the knowledge they acquire, setting them up for success later in life. Abeka learning for life begins with the right homeschool education. Learn more@abekahomeschool.com this is an iHeart podcast.
Podcast Summary: Amy Robach & T.J. Holmes Present: Aubrey O’Day, Covering the Diddy Trial Episode: The Diddy Trial: The Defense Calls…. Release Date: June 23, 2025 Host/Author: iHeartPodcasts
In this episode of Amy Robach & T.J. Holmes Present: Aubrey O’Day, Covering the Diddy Trial, hosts Amy Robach and T.J. Holmes delve into the pivotal moments of the high-profile trial of Shaquille "Diddy" Combs. Joined by former protegee Aubrey O’Day, the trio offers in-depth analysis, insights, and updates on the proceedings that have engrossed the nation.
[02:50] Co-Host:
"Hey there, folks. It is Monday, June 23rd. This is the 7th and now we're told, the final week of testimony in the Diddy trial."
The hosts announce that the trial is entering its final week of testimony, highlighting the significance of the unfolding legal battle.
[03:16] Host:
"The defense calls no one."
This bold move by Diddy's legal team surprises many, as it deviates from typical defense strategies that involve presenting witnesses to bolster their case.
[03:54] Co-Host:
"I'm still blown away by what they're saying they're going to do... The defense says they will then be done tomorrow. They're not even taking a full day to defend Diddy. That blows my mind."
The hosts express astonishment at the defense's decision to refrain from calling any witnesses, interpreting it as a sign of confidence in their case.
[04:19] Host:
"It's bold. It's really bold. It's super confident... The fact that they're not calling anyone actually could be a brilliant move in terms of what the jury was expecting."
Amy Robach elaborates on the potential psychological impact of this strategy, suggesting it might influence the jury's perception by implying the defense has a solid case without further evidence.
[05:37] Co-Host:
"The best lawyers with names like Garagos and Shapiro... They know what they're doing, so they're making the right, the best."
Acknowledging the expertise of Diddy's legal team, T.J. Holmes underscores the likelihood that this strategy is calculated and effective.
[05:37] Host:
"They have the best lawyers... They are making the right, the best."
[06:07] Host:
"They did spend days cross-examining the star witnesses, Cassie Ventura and Jane... It may be that they don't even have a witness to call to refute any of the claims."
The hosts analyze the defense's actions, noting the intensive cross-examination of prosecution witnesses as a method to weaken the case against Diddy.
[07:21] Co-Host:
"Do moments matter? Do moments stand out for a jury that could possibly sway them one way or another?"
T.J. Holmes questions the impact of key moments during the trial, pondering whether specific events or testimonies could influence the jury's decision.
[07:55] Host:
"Moments absolutely matter. The Perry Mason moment was pivotal... This is, you know what?"
Amy Robach concurs, highlighting crucial moments where defense evidence contradicted prosecution testimonies, thereby sowing doubt among jurors.
[10:27] Host:
"So he paid for these folks to participate in these freak offs around the country... If they went there willingly... Any seed of doubt about any of that throws the prosecution's argument out the window."
The discussion shifts to the specific charges against Diddy, emphasizing how evidence suggesting voluntary participation by the alleged victims undermines the prosecution's case of coercion and trafficking.
[10:23] Co-Host:
"What is the charge again?... To remind? I have the note in here."
[10:31] Host:
"He's pleaded not guilty to racketeering conspiracy."
[10:37] Co-Host:
"Two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion."
[11:29] Co-Host:
"Now one of those do carry a 15 year minimum."
[12:34] Dr. Patrick McGrath:
Ad Interruptions
The hosts outline the severe charges facing Diddy, including racketeering, sex trafficking by force, fraud, and coercion, along with potential penalties.
[18:36] Co-Host:
"They have a conference on Wednesday... jury instructions."
[19:20] Co-Host:
"... the defense, all the attorneys have no more say. Nobody can do anything. It's over."
The conversation delves into the intricacies of jury instructions and the deliberation process, explaining how meticulous and time-consuming it is to ensure jurors understand their responsibilities and the burden of proof.
[19:41] Host:
"No, I have not."
[21:22] Co-Host:
"... how they could start deliberating and something happens with a juror."
Discussions include the role of alternate jurors and the potential for disruptions during deliberations, emphasizing the complexity and high stakes of the trial.
[22:07] Co-Host:
"... the prosecution in criminal cases and the plaintiff in civil cases. They get the opportunity for a closing argument or a rebuttal after the opposing side has presented its case."
Clarification is provided on the procedural aspects, such as which side presents closing arguments last, highlighting procedural fairness.
[24:22] Host:
"... perhaps they knew more than we did or they believed something that we didn't realize... It will be fascinating."
[25:06] Co-Host:
"Remember, he has been in prison since last September."
[25:11] Host:
"... he could potentially either walk out of there in the next week, you could even argue, or he's going to find out he's going to prison for a long, long time."
The hosts speculate on potential verdicts, from acquittal to conviction on various charges, and the implications each outcome would have on Diddy's future.
As the trial approaches its climax with closing arguments and impending deliberations, Amy Robach, T.J. Holmes, and Aubrey O’Day provide a comprehensive and nuanced examination of the defense's strategy, the weight of the charges, and the critical moments that could sway the jury's decision. The episode underscores the high stakes involved and the meticulous nature of the judicial process, leaving listeners poised for the trial's impending resolution.
Host (Amy Robach) [04:19]:
"It's bold. It's really bold. It's super confident... The fact that they're not calling anyone actually could be a brilliant move in terms of what the jury was expecting."
Co-Host (T.J. Holmes) [05:37]:
"The best lawyers with names like Garagos and Shapiro... They know what they're doing, so they're making the right, the best."
Host (Amy Robach) [07:55]:
"Moments absolutely matter. The Perry Mason moment was pivotal... This is, you know what?"
Host (Amy Robach) [12:34]:
"He paid for these folks to participate in these freak offs around the country... If they went there willingly... Any seed of doubt about any of that throws the prosecution's argument out the window."
Co-Host (T.J. Holmes) [19:20]:
"... the prosecution in criminal cases and the plaintiff in civil cases. They get the opportunity for a closing argument or a rebuttal after the opposing side has presented its case."
Host (Amy Robach) [25:11]:
"... he could potentially either walk out of there in the next week, you could even argue, or he's going to find out he's going to prison for a long, long time."
This episode provides listeners with a thorough breakdown of the Diddy trial's final week, emphasizing the defense's unconventional approach and its potential ramifications. By dissecting legal strategies, jury dynamics, and the gravity of the charges, Amy Robach and T.J. Holmes, along with Aubrey O’Day, equip their audience with a deeper understanding of one of the most talked-about trials of the year.