Podcast
Apologetics Live
Hosted by Andrew Rappaport · EN
A live apologetics 2-hour show to answer challenging questions and teach how to do apologetics. It is hosted by Andrew Rappaport.
16episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
Unraveling the Fine-Tuning Argument: A Journey from Atheism to Theism
1w ago02:04:04Tap to summarizeThis episode features a profound discussion between Andrew Rappaport and his guests as they delve into the intricacies of belief, skepticism, and the journey from atheism to theism, particularly through the lens of Bill Kluck's recent transformation. Kluck articulates his compelling arguments for the existence of a creator, emphasizing the remarkable fine-tuning of the universe and the complexities inherent in biological systems that challenge purely atheistic explanations. The dialogue navigates through various philosophical and scientific considerations, such as the implications of fine-tuning, the origins of life, and the nature of suffering, ultimately converging on the necessity of divine intervention in understanding these phenomena. Rappaport and his special co-host, Eric Hovind, engage Kluck in a respectful and thought-provoking manner, encouraging a candid exploration of the evidence and personal experiences that have shaped their beliefs. The episode culminates in a heartfelt appeal for Kluck to embrace the transformative power of the gospel, underscoring the significance of faith in navigating life's complexities.Takeaways:The discussion between the speakers pivots around the nature of truth and whether one should seek objective evidence or adhere to a narrative that aligns with personal beliefs.A significant focus is placed on the contrasting perspectives between atheism and theism, particularly how personal experiences and intellectual pursuits influence one's belief system.The speakers articulate a compelling argument about the universe's complexity and fine-tuning, suggesting that these elements point to a divine creator rather than to random chance.The notion of free will versus determinism is explored, particularly how individuals navigate their faith journeys and how their choices affect their beliefs.The episode culminates in a heartfelt appeal to recognize the need for surrender to God, emphasizing that understanding one's limitations is crucial in the pursuit of truth.
Transcribe →The Great Debate: Should Christians Endorse the Death Penalty?
2w ago02:19:32Tap to summarizeThis episode of Apologetics Live features a formal debate on the contentious issue of whether Christians should endorse the death penalty. The debate is anchored by two young debaters, Wesley Cook and Graham Brewer, who present compelling arguments from distinct perspectives. Wesley advocates for the endorsement of the death penalty, citing biblical mandates and the necessity for justice in upholding God's commands. Conversely, Graham argues against this position, emphasizing the risk of wrongful executions and the moral implications of supporting a system that may fail to administer justice fairly. The discourse navigates through various biblical texts, ethical considerations, and the implications of government authority, making for a thought-provoking examination of a deeply divisive topic. As the conversation unfolds, listeners are encouraged to engage with the arguments presented, reflecting on the intersection of faith, morality, and justice within contemporary society.Takeaways:This episode of Apologetics Live features a formal debate on whether Christians should endorse the death penalty, providing an engaging exploration of this contentious issue.Both debaters present contrasting views, with one advocating for the biblical basis of capital punishment and the other arguing against it due to the potential for wrongful executions.Listeners are encouraged to consider the implications of their beliefs on justice, mercy, and the role of government in enacting biblical principles as they listen to this thought-provoking discussion.
Transcribe →A Deconvert Faces TAG: Can Presuppositionalism Reach the Honest Skeptic?
4w ago02:07:24Tap to summarizeHe grew up on a missionary campus in rural East Texas. He played music in church, attended every summer camp, became a worship leader in Orlando, and fully invested himself in the Christian faith he loved. Then he walked away. Landon Pontius is the kind of deconvert most apologists are not used to engaging — articulate, kind, not bitter, and openly stating he would almost prefer to still believe. In his widely shared essay, he explained that the Christian apologetic arguments he encountered either "rest on presumptions of the Bible's historicity" or rely on "ideas that are too abstract to directly dispute." That second category is the heart of this episode.This week, host Andrew Rappaport sits down with Landon to test whether the Transcendental Argument for God (TAG) and the broader presuppositional method can do what evidential apologetics, in Landon's experience, did not. Anchored in Proverbs 1:7, Colossians 2:3, and Romans 1:18–22, the conversation will press the foundational question every worldview must answer: How do you account for logic, induction, moral realism, and the very reliability of reason itself? Andrew will not be arguing that Landon needs more evidence. He will be arguing that, on his current worldview, the very tools Landon uses to evaluate evidence have no foundation. Listeners will see presuppositional apologetics modeled live against an articulate, intellectually engaged former believer — exactly the situation TAG was designed to address.True to the format, the second hour swings the doors wide. Atheists, agnostics, fellow deconverts, classical apologists who think presuppositionalism overstates its case, and Christians wanting to learn the method are all welcome to join, push back, ask questions, or bring their own challenges. Bring your toughest objection or your most honest doubt, or just listen and learn how the gospel speaks to the foundations of thought itself.Takeaways:The ease with which individuals identify fallacies in other religions often stems from a lack of self-awareness regarding their own beliefs.The importance of dialogue in apologetics is underscored by engaging with opposing viewpoints to foster understanding rather than merely debating.The diverse experiences of deconversion highlight the complexity of faith and belief, demonstrating that not all journeys away from religion are rooted in trauma.Understanding presuppositional arguments requires an examination of the foundational beliefs that underpin one's worldview, whether theistic or naturalistic.The discussion illustrates that both theism and naturalism face challenges in explaining the existence and nature of logic and morality, emphasizing the need for coherent frameworks.Ultimately, the pursuit of truth in religious discourse necessitates a willingness to engage honestly with differing perspectives while maintaining a focus on the core questions of existence and morality.
Transcribe →Navigating Controversial Waters: Understanding the Debate Surrounding Baptism and Salvation
Apr 2402:00:14Tap to summarizeThe episode delves into the complex and often contentious topic of baptism, addressing various theological perspectives on its significance within the Christian faith. Andrew Rappaport, the host, elucidates the concept of baptismal regeneration, engaging with questions about whether baptism is essential for salvation and the implications of infant baptism within differing denominational beliefs. He emphasizes that the act of baptism in the early church held profound weight, often leading to social ostracization for those who chose to publicly proclaim their faith. The discussion also touches upon contemporary issues surrounding freedom of speech and religious expression, making it clear that Christians do not seek to legislate belief but rather to share their faith openly. By the end of the episode, listeners are invited to contemplate the historical and current ramifications of baptism, its theological interpretations, and the importance of understanding these elements in their own spiritual journeys.Takeaways:This episode features a comprehensive exploration of the relationship between baptism and salvation, emphasizing the necessity of faith preceding baptism.Listeners are encouraged to engage with the hosts' perspectives on whether legislation can dictate religious practices, particularly in the context of the Bible.The discussion highlights the historical context of Christianity's stance on issues such as slavery, providing insight into the evolution of moral perspectives within the faith.The hosts address the importance of understanding the motivations behind religious beliefs, particularly in the debates surrounding LGBTQ+ issues and how they relate to Christian doctrine.Emphasis is placed on the role of church history in safeguarding against heresies and guiding believers in their faith journey.A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to the Q&A format, allowing listeners to pose challenging questions about God and the Bible, fostering engagement and exploration.
Transcribe →A Charismatic Pastor Dismantles Bill Johnson’s “Heaven” — And It Is Not Pretty
Apr 1702:04:39Tap to summarizeThe focal point of the current discourse is an incisive examination of Bill Johnson's theological assertions as presented in his book, *When Heaven Invades Earth*. The host, Andrew Rappaport, along with his guest, Adam Parker, strives to elucidate the implications of Johnson's teachings, particularly concerning the nature of divine power within the Christian experience. They delve into the potential dangers associated with prioritizing experiential manifestations of power over scriptural authority, raising critical questions about the legitimacy of such beliefs. The conversation also explores the broader ramifications of these theological constructs within the context of the Bethel movement and its impact on contemporary Christian thought. Listeners are encouraged to engage with this pivotal dialogue, which seeks not only to challenge prevailing notions but also to foster a deeper understanding of the interplay between faith, scripture, and experience in the life of believers.Takeaways:In this episode of Apologetics Live, Andrew Rappaport and Adam Parker explore the theological implications of Bill Johnson's book 'When Heaven Invades Earth', emphasizing the necessity of grounding experiences in Scripture rather than allowing personal experiences to dictate theological understanding.The hosts argue that when power becomes the measure of legitimacy in the Christian life, Scripture is subordinated, leading to a distorted view of God and the Gospel that emphasizes miraculous experiences over sound doctrine and biblical authority.Adam Parker shares his concern that the Bethel movement prioritizes miraculous manifestations as the standard for normal Christianity, which can lead to spiritual abuse and a misunderstanding of the nature of Jesus' humanity and divinity.The discussion highlights the dangers of conflating personal experiences with biblical truth, asserting that true Christian maturity is defined by the fruit of the Spirit rather than the pursuit of miraculous signs and wonders.
Transcribe →Engaging Conversations: Transitioning from Everyday Topics to the Gospel
Apr 302:29:30Tap to summarizeApologetics Live presents a compelling exploration of the intricacies of evangelism, featuring host Andrew Rappaport alongside esteemed guest Pastor George. The focal point of this discussion is the critical necessity of sharing the gospel, particularly in the context of contemporary societal challenges and misconceptions about faith. Andrew and George delve into the myriad reasons that deter individuals from proclaiming their beliefs and offer practical strategies to overcome these obstacles. By emphasizing the importance of genuine relationships in evangelism, they encourage listeners to embrace the responsibility of sharing the hope found in Christ. This episode promises to enlighten and inspire, urging the audience to actively engage in meaningful conversations about faith and the transformative power of the gospel. Tune in to gain insights that may profoundly impact your approach to sharing your beliefs with others.Takeaways:The podcast emphasizes the importance of evangelism and engaging in discussions about faith with confidence and clarity.Listeners are encouraged to overcome fears of rejection and share the gospel message with those around them.The exchange ministry offers practical tools and resources to equip individuals and churches for effective evangelism.Inevitably, individuals must confront the nature of sin and the need for redemption through Christ in their discussions about faith.Links referenced in this episode:exchangemessage.orgBen Shapiro and Others MOCKED This Christian Couple. Were They Right?
Transcribe →The Nature of the Sabbath: A Theological Discourse on Rest and Worship
Mar 2702:00:25Tap to summarizeThe salient point of this podcast episode revolves around the critical examination of the concept of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, particularly in relation to the beliefs held by Unitarians and Jehovah's Witnesses regarding the nature of the Holy Spirit. Andrew Rappaport, the host, engages in a thorough analysis of the scriptural basis for this contentious doctrine, referencing key passages from Luke, Matthew, and Mark. He delineates the distinctions between various interpretations of blasphemy and emphasizes the significance of context in understanding these biblical texts. The discussion further explores the implications of these beliefs for individuals and their spiritual standing, offering insights that challenge common misconceptions. As such, listeners are invited to reflect deeply upon these theological matters and their relevance to contemporary faith practices.Takeaways:Andrew Rappaport emphasizes that Apologetics Live is designed to address any inquiries regarding God and the Bible, encouraging listeners to engage and ask questions during the live sessions.The podcast discusses the importance of understanding the historical context and internal coherence of biblical texts, particularly the uniqueness of the Bible compared to other religious writings.A significant point raised involves the internal consistency of the Bible over 1500 years and through over 40 authors, highlighting the uniqueness of its narrative and teachings.The episode delves into the concept of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, explaining its implications and the distinction between this and other forms of denial of faith.Listeners are urged to consider the relevance of the Sabbath in contemporary life, exploring the balance between rest, worship, and recreational activities on this holy day.Andrew Rappaport offers insights into the necessity of approaching the Bible with a mindset focused on understanding its divine message rather than merely adhering to cultural interpretations.Links referenced in this episode:Would AI convert to Christianity?econews
Transcribe →Unraveling the SBC: Insights from Apologetics Live
Mar 2001:27:48Tap to summarizeThis podcast episode presents an incisive examination of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) and its gradual shift towards liberalism, a transformation that has provoked significant debate among its members. Andrew Rappaport, the host, articulates the pressing need to scrutinize the SBC's trajectory, particularly in light of recent controversies surrounding leadership and doctrinal integrity. Throughout the episode, he delves into the implications of social justice ideologies infiltrating the denomination, highlighting the importance of maintaining theological fidelity amidst institutional pressures. By referencing a critical documentary, Rappaport encourages listeners to engage thoughtfully with the ongoing discussions surrounding the SBC and to consider the broader ramifications for evangelicalism as a whole. This episode serves as a clarion call for vigilance and accountability within the church, urging its members to prioritize truth over institutional preservation.Takeaways:The podcast emphasizes the importance of addressing challenging questions regarding God and the Bible in a live format.Andrew Rappaport discusses the historical context of the Southern Baptist Convention's conservative resurgence and its subsequent liberal drift.Listeners are encouraged to engage with the content by submitting questions and participating in discussions during the live broadcasts.The episode highlights a critical examination of the influence of social justice within the Southern Baptist Convention, raising concerns about its impact on biblical integrity.Links referenced in this episode:ApologeticsLive.com christianpodcastcommunity.orgrapreport.orgthetruthfellowship.orgoxfordvalleychapel.orgCompanies mentioned in this episode:Striving for Eternity MinistriesApologetics LiveChristian podcast communityCrossPoliticSouthern Baptist ConventionChristianity TodayHe Gets Us campaignGuidepost SolutionsHearts for the LostOpen Air Theology ConferenceLogos Bible SoftwareMentioned in this episode:What do We Believe by Andrew Rappaport
Transcribe →Is the United States Engaged in a War with Iran? An In-Depth Analysis
Mar 601:23:29Tap to summarizeThe primary focus of this podcast episode is the complex geopolitical situation surrounding the United States and Iran, particularly the question of whether the United States is at war with Iran. Andrew Rappaport, host of the Rapp Report and Apologetics Live podcasts, engages with the audience to dissect the nuances of the current conflict and the differing motivations of the United States and Israel in their dealings with Iran. He articulates a perspective that suggests the actual battleground may not solely be in Iran but rather extends to the broader implications of U.S. foreign policy, particularly in relation to China. Throughout the discussion, Rappaport invites listeners to reconsider the narratives presented in the media and encourages a more nuanced understanding of the motivations behind military actions. Listeners are urged to reflect on the intersection of geopolitics and apologetics, as the complexities of these issues resonate deeply with the principles of defending one’s beliefs and understanding the context of global affairs. This episode promises to provide valuable insights and provoke thoughtful dialogue on these pressing matters.Takeaways:In this episode, Andrew Rappaport provides a nuanced perspective on the ongoing conflict involving Iran, emphasizing that the narrative presented in the media does not always align with the underlying realities of the situation.The discussion highlights the complexity of international relations, suggesting that the United States' actions may be more strategically focused on countering China's influence rather than solely addressing threats from Iran.Andrew Rappaport underscores the importance of critical thinking when consuming news, advocating for a balanced understanding that considers multiple viewpoints rather than accepting any single narrative as absolute truth.The episode also draws parallels between military strategy and apologetics, asserting that both require a careful examination of the information available and a recognition of the biases that may influence one's understanding.Rappaport argues that the historical context of U.S. foreign policy suggests a long-standing pattern of military engagement that transcends individual administrations, thus prompting listeners to think critically about current events in light of past actions.Ultimately, the episode encourages listeners to engage thoughtfully with geopolitical issues, reflecting on the implications of America's foreign policy decisions and their broader impact on global stability.Mentioned in this episode:What do We Believe by Andrew Rappaport
Transcribe →The Plurality Paradox: Unpacking the 'We' in the Quran
Feb 2702:05:46Tap to summarizeIn this thought-provoking episode, Andrew Rappaport engages in a profound exploration of the complexities surrounding the use of plural pronouns in the Quran when referring to Allah. The discussion delves into the assertion that this linguistic choice raises significant questions about the nature of God's singularity as understood in Islamic theology. Andrew and his guest, Nicholas, scrutinize the implications of such language, particularly in light of the Quran's explicit condemnation of the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. Throughout the conversation, they highlight the necessity for Christians to be well-versed in apologetics to effectively address these challenges. The episode promises to be an enlightening experience for listeners, inviting them to think critically about the intersections of language, theology, and belief systems in both Islam and Christianity.Takeaways:In this episode, Andrew Rappaport elucidates the complexities of truth claims in relation to logic and statements, emphasizing that all statements must be either true or false.The discussion highlights the necessity for rigorous examination of claims regarding the existence of entities, such as babies, as a foundation for logical argumentation.Andrew Rappaport introduces the intriguing topic of the plural pronoun usage in the Quran, questioning its implications for Islamic monotheism and the nature of Allah.A critical examination of the Quran's statements about Jesus and Mary reveals a misunderstanding of Christian doctrine, particularly regarding the Trinity and the nature of God.Listeners are encouraged to participate in Apologetics Live, where challenging questions about God and the Bible can be posed, fostering a spirit of inquiry and dialogue.The episode ultimately argues that the plurality found in the Quran poses significant challenges to the Islamic conception of God, necessitating further exploration and discussion.Links referenced in this episode:apologeticslive.commrm.orgstrivingforeternity.orgmypillow.comstrivingforeternity.org/plungestrivingforeternity.org/podCompanies mentioned in this episode:Apologetics LiveStriving for Eternity MinistriesMormon Research MinistryMyPillowPlungePod Company
Transcribe →