Apple News Today – Episode Summary
Episode: How ICE accountability has changed under Trump
Date: January 13, 2026
Host: Shumita Basu
Overview
This episode delves into three of the day’s key stories:
- How federal accountability for ICE has changed in Donald Trump’s second term, focusing on recent high-profile incidents of use of force and escalated tensions in Minnesota.
- A Supreme Court showdown over state bans on transgender athletes, including the personal story of a 15-year-old plaintiff and what’s at stake constitutionally.
- Why “starter homes” are disappearing in America, making the American Dream of homeownership much harder to achieve for first-time buyers.
Main Story: ICE Accountability and Escalation in Minnesota
Key Developments
-
The Department of Homeland Security, led by Secretary Kristi Noem, has announced a surge of ICE agents in Minneapolis, sparking lawsuits by Minnesota state and local officials.
- Minnesota AG Keith Ellison argues the deployment has “sown chaos in the Twin Cities.”
- Protesters are calling for answers after agents fatally shot a woman, Renee Nicole Good, fueling demands for accountability.
-
Federal resistance to oversight: The FBI is investigating the shooting but has refused to involve state officials, leading Gov. Tim Walz to question the “legitimacy” of the probe.
-
Pattern of escalation: Other cities have also seen aggressive ICE tactics, e.g.,
- October in Chicago—Border Patrol officer shot a woman warning others about ICE.
- Los Angeles—“Trojan Horse” sting with agents in rental trucks at Home Depot targeting day laborers.
Shift in Accountability under Trump
[02:24–04:15]
-
ICE now the most well-funded law enforcement agency, but without funding for accountability.
- Julia Ainsley (NBC News):
"Even though ICE is now the most well-funded law enforcement agency in the entire country, not a dollar of that money went toward accountability." [00:18]
- Julia Ainsley (NBC News):
-
Changes in oversight and internal checks:
- Staff cutbacks in ICE’s own investigative office and the agency’s inspector general’s office.
- Watchdog agencies staffed to ensure lawful conduct (e.g., Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Office, asylum review officers) have been “gutted,” per insiders.
- A whistleblower report last year claimed hundreds of complaints now go unresolved.
-
Legal gray areas in officer conduct:
- Julia Ainsley:
"There are really two ends of the spectrum when it comes to how ICE trains its officers and what they're allowed to do." [02:24] "On one end, you have what would be outside of the scope of duties... on the far other end, you have best practices." [02:35]
- In the Good shooting, the officer’s actions were “not within best practices,” specifically stepping in front of a moving car, but such breaches are still shielded if they fall under “scope of duties.”
"That would be against the best practices." [03:14]
- Julia Ainsley:
Memorable Quotes
- Julia Ainsley:
"The deployment of thousands of armed mass DHS agents to Minnesota has done our state serious harm. This is, in essence, a federal invasion of the Twin Cities and Minnesota, and it must stop." [01:14, attributed to Keith Ellison via Ainsley]
"There is an office that was with inside ICE that would do more of these investigations into officer conduct that has been eroded under this administration… I've heard the term 'gutted'." [03:48, 04:15]
Takeaway
- Under the Trump administration, internal and external mechanisms for holding ICE accountable have been systematically weakened, making it easier for agents to act with impunity even when breaching “best practices.”
Supreme Court: Transgender Athletes and State Bans
Case Overview
[05:31–08:10]
- The Supreme Court hears arguments challenging state bans on transgender girls and women competing on women’s sports teams, focusing on two cases, prominently that of Becky Pepper Jackson, a 15-year-old barred from her school track team in West Virginia.
- “Sport is something that everybody should have the opportunity to do.” – Becky Pepper Jackson [05:31]
- Key legal questions:
- Do such bans violate the Equal Protection Clause?
- Do they violate Title IX protections against sex discrimination in education?
Arguments from Both Sides
- State/Supporters of the Ban:
- Argue that trans girls and women have physical advantages over cisgender females.
- Claim the bans address a large, urgent problem.
- Challengers:
- Assert the laws are excessively broad and only affect a handful of individuals.
- In West Virginia’s case, the plaintiff is the only student currently affected.
Federal Government’s Position
- Trump administration has escalated the issue via executive orders threatening to revoke school funding and has sided with states, submitting amicus briefs supporting the bans.
Precedent and Outlook
- 2020 Supreme Court Ruling: Discrimination against transgender people in the workplace violates civil rights law. Plaintiffs argue similar reasoning should apply to Title IX.
- Justice Neil Gorsuch, author of the 2020 majority opinion, is likely a pivotal voice in the current cases.
Notable Quotes
- Maureen Grappi (USA Today):
"One of the disputes in this case is how big a problem there is that these laws are trying to address... In the case of the West Virginia student who's challenging it, she says West Virginia's ban, she's the only person who the ban applies to in the entire state." [06:49]
"The states say that their bans are different because while someone's gender doesn't usually make a difference in the workplace, they say that whether you're a boy or a girl has a huge difference for how you were able to compete on the playing field." [07:54]
The Disappearance of Starter Homes in America
Key Trends
[08:56–11:18]
-
Homeownership as a foundational economic step is becoming out-of-reach for many, especially first-time buyers (often millennials).
- Julie Weil (Washington Post):
“Homeownership is a huge economic choice that shapes your whole reality in the economy." [08:56]
- Julie Weil (Washington Post):
-
Housing prices: Since 2019, the US median home price has risen by nearly $100,000.
-
Supply-side problems: Developers build fewer small (“starter”) homes in favor of profitable, large-floorplan models.
- In 1970s, only one in five homes had four+ bedrooms; by 2022, it’s nearly half.
-
Regulatory barriers:
- Zoning laws often prohibit denser, smaller homes.
- Demand for large homes with multiple bathrooms and garages squeezes out starter home production.
-
Consequences:
- Even high-earning, stable professionals are unable to buy.
"Even with a good job, this is just not something I can afford." [10:51]
- Even high-earning, stable professionals are unable to buy.
Glimmers of Hope
- Some new policies in cities like St. Louis, Minneapolis, and states like Arizona, Texas, and Colorado are starting to increase starter home construction.
Notable Quotes
- Julie Weil:
"If that first rung of the ladder is gone, it's hard to get on the ladder at all." [09:05]
"A conversation I have over and over... people who often have good jobs... say, even with a good job, this is just not something I can afford." [10:51]
Quick Headlines & Memorable Moments
[11:18–End]
- Former Fed chairs criticize DOJ inquiry into Jerome Powell as “an unprecedented attempt to use prosecutorial attacks to undermine the Fed’s independence.”
- NYC nurses' massive strike for better staffing, security, and wages.
- Mattel introduces a Barbie with autism, featuring sensory-friendly clothing and accessories.
"It is so important for young autistic people to see authentic, joyful representations of themselves. That's exactly what this doll is."
Timestamps & Navigation
| Segment | Topic | Start Time | |---------|----------------------------------------------------------|------------| | 00:05 | ICE, DHS and law enforcement ramp-up in Minnesota | 00:05 | | 01:14 | Quotes from state officials about federal “invasion” | 01:14 | | 02:24 | Julia Ainsley explains ICE accountability issues | 02:24 | | 03:41 | Erosion of ICE internal oversight | 03:41 | | 05:31 | Supreme Court and transgender athlete bans debate | 05:31 | | 08:56 | The vanishing “starter home” in the US | 08:56 | | 11:18 | News in brief: Fed probe, NYC nurses' strike, autistic Barbie | 11:18 |
In the words of Julia Ainsley:
"Doge took really a sledgehammer across the federal government. But DHS was not a place where they were especially heavy handed... a lot of the cuts that happened at DHS had more to do with cutting out areas that were not in line with the administration's priorities." [04:15]
This summary provides a comprehensive guide for anyone who hasn’t listened to the episode, highlighting the complex interplay of federal policy shifts, personal impact, and social change discussed on Apple News Today (Jan 13, 2026).
