Loading summary
A
Foreign. Good morning. It's Wednesday, December 3rd. I'm Shemitah Basu. This is Apple News today. On today's show, while Trump goes more aggressively after alleged Venezuelan drug boats, a presidential pardon for the former Honduran leader convicted on drug trafficking charges, an escalation on the immigration crackdown as the US pauses all applications from 19 countries. And what happens when surprises relatives show up to claim inheritance? But first, the questions over US Strikes in the Caribbean won't go away. Last week, the Washington Post reported that following an initial attack on an alleged drug boat, US Forces struck again at two survivors clinging to the wreckage. Critics have said if true, it could constitute a war crime. Since that report, lawmakers have announced two congressional inquiries and the administration's position and tone has shifted markedly. First, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth described the report as fabricated fake news on Friday. By Monday, Press Secretary Caroline Levitt read a scripted statement which acknowledged the strike had in fact happened. But she denied that Hegseth gave the order for that second strike, instead naming a Navy admiral. Secretary Hegseth authorized Admiral Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes. Admiral Bradley worked well within his authority and the law directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated. That statement from Leavitt prompted some officials in the Defense Department to speak with Post reporters anonymously, saying they were angry that Hegseth hadn't taken more ownership. The Post's original report suggested military officials carried out a second strike to comply with an order from Hegseth to kill everybody on board. At yesterday's televised Cabinet meeting, reporters put the issue to Exeth directly.
B
I watched that first strike live, as you can imagine, at the Department of War, we got a lot of things to do. So I didn't stick around for the hour and two hours, whatever, where all the sensitive site exploitation digitally occurs. So I moved on to my next meeting. A couple of hours later, I learned that that commander had made the which he had the complete authority to do. And by the way, Admiral Bradley made the correct decision to ultimately sink the boat and eliminate the threat.
A
And Hexeth emphasized that he supported the move.
B
It was the right call. We have his back and the American people are safer because narco terrorists know you can't bring drugs through the water. And eventually on land, if necessary, we will eliminate that threat and we're proud to do it.
A
President Trump's tone also changed on Sunday. He told reporters he, quote, wouldn't have wanted a second strike. But at the Cabinet meeting, he said this.
B
I want Those boats taken out, and if we have to, we'll attack on land also, just like we tack on sea. And there's very little coming in by sea. I think we've knocked out over 90% of it. There's very little, and I understand that there's very little. We're saving hundreds of thousands of lives with those pinpoint attacks.
A
The alleged second strike targeting survivors is now drawing intense bipartisan scrutiny in Congress. Republican Senator Roger Wicker, who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, has said that he's seeking audio and video recordings in an effort to get a better understanding of how to proceed with an inquiry. Meanwhile, his Democratic counterpart, Senator Jack Reed, explained why they're seeking this on cnn.
B
We need information because we have to make a judgment whether this operation is legal, not just the individual strikes, but the whole operation. And then, of course, the attention is now being focused on one of the strikes and the possibility of criminal activity.
A
On Thursday, Navy Admiral Bradley heads to Capitol Hill for a closed door session with lawmakers, where he's expected to face questions on what exactly happened that day. The White House's increasing focus on Central and South America goes beyond military force. It's political, too. Honduras is in the middle of a tense election, but it's been words and actions from President Trump that have been dominating the political conversation in the country this week. Honduras former President Juan Orlando Hernandez walked free from a US Prison after President Trump pardoned him. He had been convicted last year of conspiring with drug traffickers importing massive amounts of cocaine into the U.S. authorities called it one of the biggest and most violent drug trafficking conspiracies in the world. And he had been sentenced to 45 years in prison. But Trump was unconvinced by the charges and he defended his clemency decision to reporters on Sunday.
B
The people of Honduras really thought he was set up and it was a terrible thing. He was the president of the country and they basically said he was a drug dealer because he was the president of the country. And they said it was a Biden administration set up. And I looked at the facts and I agreed with them.
A
Hernandez had sent a four page letter to Trump pleading his innocence and said he had found strength in the president's resilience in the face of, quote, persecution and prosecution. His conviction was, according to Trump, a Biden witch hunt. But the prosecutors began looking into Hernandez's drug connections before even Trump's first term. And the judge who ultimately found him guilty said that evidence showed not only was Hernandez using his position of power to support cartels. He also deployed his nation's police and military to protect the drug trade. Hernandez's brother was arrested on drug trafficking charges too, during Trump's first term, a case partly led by a close Trump ally. As Hernandez walks free, he faces an uncertain future. Apparently he wants to go back to his home country where his family is based. He has no US Legal status, but going back could get complicated if his political allies fail to take power. Election results in Honduras are being counted right now, and they're on a knife edge. Trump has talked directly about the race, saying US Aid for the country was contingent on Hernandez's conservative party winning. He has since suggested the count is being rigged against them without providing evidence. Rodolfo Pastor was an advisor to the outgoing left leaning president of Honduras. He told Democracy now that Trump was threatening Honduras for making a sovereign decision.
B
For us it's shocking. It's a blow to Honduran dignity and democracy that a foreign president would first of all state publicly what his preferences were and also to to be so hostile and aggressive in his stance. He's almost threatening Honduras that if we don't do what he is demanding that we do, then that he will wreak vengeance against Honduras.
A
Pastor also noted that Trump's positioning toward Honduras was in stark contrast to his approach to Venezuela's ruling Socialist Party and its president, Nicolas Maduro, who the administration has characterized as heading up a drug cartel, a charge that Maduro denies. Latin America analyst and editor in chief of America's Quarterly Brian Winter, alluded to this difference in approach on CNN's Amanpour show earlier this week.
B
The dissonance, to use a very polite word, I think, is very clear. I understand President Trump, he says that this was a case of a president being persecuted, as he believes he was. That may explain at least part of the decision making here. But there is no doubt that many, both inside the United States as well as certainly within Latin America, have picked up on what they see as a double standard.
A
The elections in Honduras had high turnout and were carried out peacefully, but officials say they're encountering technical issues. Analysts warned Reuters that if the counting drags on and results in a virtual toss up, more than one party could claim victory, increasing the risk of civil unrest. Now let's turn to a story that caught our eye about all those spit in a tube home DNA tests. As many as one in five Americans say they've taken one. And you've probably heard stories about surprising discoveries. Some welcome, some not. The Wall Street Journal's Ashley Eblink Told us about how some of these test results are leading to messy litigation involving inheritance.
C
When people find out that they're related to someone they didn't know they were related to and then they find out there's a estate involved, suddenly there are these inheritance claims. So it can completely wreak havoc with family members who are trying to settle in a state of a loved one. When a surprise heir shows up, lawyers.
A
Told her what happens next with these so called surprise heirs really depends on the state you live in.
C
In some states, simply genetics can determine who could make a claim in the absence of a will or trust. And that means basically someone could inherit from their biological father even if he never knew of them. There are other states though, that work differently where there are factors, such as if there was a relationship with the deceased.
A
In some cases, a claim to inheritance could get further in court if there was evidence a parent acknowledged or supported the would be heir. That's exactly what happened a few years ago in a case in Utah, there are two siblings fighting over their father's estate. In court found that they had a half brother via a DNA test. He claimed that the father, who didn't have a will, had sent him birthday cards for years and he was therefore entitled to some of the inheritance. The half sibling ultimately won a third of it in court.
C
The lawyers for the families who found out about the surprise heir, they were all saying very adamant, don't do these DNA test kits. But the basic advice is everyone needs a will or a trust. And the language in those documents has to spell out whether biological children who aren't known to the family would inherit or not.
A
Even with a will or trust, broad phrases like to my descendants or to my children can still leave the door open for a surprise heir to make a claim, according to the Journal. In some cases, new laws are being more prescriptive about who can inherit what.
C
States are grappling with how to rewrite laws to address this issue. Delaware just in August passed a law making clear that half siblings from donor sperm can't suddenly inherit.
A
For some families who've reached painful settlements in court, both the surprise inheritor and the other family members have found the process to be difficult. One told Ebling that she hoped other families could avoid the pain that they suffered. Before we let you go, a few other stories we're following. President Trump lashed out against immigrants from Somalia during his Cabinet meeting on Tuesday, calling them garbage and saying he, quote, doesn't want them in our country. His comments came as ICE prepares a major crackdown against Somalis in Minneapolis, according to the Wall Street Journal. ICE strike teams and about 100 agents from across the country are being brought in to target Somalis who have final deportation orders. Roughly 40,000 Minnesotans were born in Somalia, according to census estimates. Minnesota governor Tim Walls called Trump's actions a PR stunt and said on social media indiscriminately targeting immigrants is not a real solution to a problem. Meanwhile, the Trump administration, in an escalation of an earlier policy announcement from this week, has PA caused all immigration applications, including green cards and citizenship processing for 19 countries that the administration previously restricted travel from. Those countries include Iran, Haiti, Libya and Somalia, among others. The administration previously blocked people from those countries from permanently immigrating to the US or applying for travel or student visas. Several immigration lawyers told the New York Times their clients on Tuesday had naturalization ceremonies canceled, as well as interview appointments with no explanation. Results are in for Tennessee's special election. Republican Matt Van Epps won the House seat, defeating Democratic state Representative Afton Bain in a race that was looking tight in its final days and being watched across the country, including from the White House. President Trump posted his congratulations on social media. Van Epps received more than $1 million from Maga Inc. Marking the first time the pro Trump super PAC spent money on a campaign since last year's presidential race. In the end, Van Epps won with a much smaller margin compared to Trump's 2024 result against Kamala Harris in the same district. And finally, the beloved show Mad Men, which chronicles Life in the 1960s Golden Age of advertising, made its way to HBO max this week in 4K for the first time. But along with crystal clear footage came some mistakes picked up by eagle eyed audiences. Those binge watching found shows out of order, mistitled, and in one, a glaring error somehow made it through. It's in the episode where Roger Sterling is forced to climb hundreds of stairs to get to a meeting and he's feeling queasy.
B
And of course my partner Roger Sterling. We heard the elevator's down. Those boys over at United Fruit talk about you like you invented the damn banana.
A
Don't worry, we're gonna save you the sound of what comes next. But in watching this version, you can clearly see a member of the crew manning the fake vomit mach. The producers had apparently sent the wrong file to hbo. The publication Aristechnica points out these things can happen with older shows. Changing aspect ratios reveal crew or equipment. When Seinfeld first arrived on Netflix, a pothole central to the plot was completely cropped out. You can find all these stories and more in the Apple News app. And if you're already listening, if you the News app right now. We've got a narrated article coming up next. Thanksgiving travel is now behind us, but Christmas is just around the corner. The New Yorker reports on the ever evolving airport lounge and whether it's better to be on the outside or in. If you're listening in the podcast app, follow Apple News plus Narrated to find that story. And I'll be back with the news tomorrow. It.
Main Theme:
This episode, hosted by Shumita Basu, examines the escalating controversy surrounding U.S. military strikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean—focusing on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s role, congressional scrutiny, and shifting narratives within the Trump administration. The episode also covers President Trump's surprise pardon of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez, ongoing immigration crackdowns, and a feature on surprise heirs arising from home DNA tests.
Initial Reports & Allegations:
Change in Official Story:
“Secretary Hegseth authorized Admiral Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes. Admiral Bradley worked well within his authority and the law directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated.” — Caroline Leavitt ([01:21])
Internal Tensions:
Hegseth's Cabinet Response:
Quote ([02:05]):
"I watched that first strike live... So I moved on to my next meeting. A couple of hours later, I learned that that commander had made the [decision], which he had the complete authority to do. And by the way, Admiral Bradley made the correct decision to ultimately sink the boat and eliminate the threat." — Pete Hegseth
Added ([02:33]):
“It was the right call. We have his back and the American people are safer because narco terrorists know you can't bring drugs through the water. And eventually on land, if necessary, we will eliminate that threat and we’re proud to do it.” — Pete Hegseth
President Trump’s Position Evolves:
"I want those boats taken out, and if we have to, we'll attack on land also, just like we attack on sea... We're saving hundreds of thousands of lives with those pinpoint attacks." — Donald Trump
Bipartisan Congressional Scrutiny:
“We need information because we have to make a judgment whether this operation is legal, not just the individual strikes, but the whole operation... the possibility of criminal activity.” — Jack Reed ([03:38])
Upcoming Testimony:
Event Recap:
"The people of Honduras really thought he was set up and it was a terrible thing... And I looked at the facts and I agreed with them." — Donald Trump
Background Contradictions:
Implications for Honduras:
Reactions in Honduras:
"For us it’s shocking... that a foreign president would first of all state publicly what his preferences were and also to be so hostile and aggressive in his stance. He's almost threatening Honduras that if we don't do what he is demanding... he will wreak vengeance against Honduras." — Rodolfo Pastor
Contrast With U.S. Policy on Venezuela:
"The dissonance, to use a very polite word, I think, is very clear... there is no doubt that many... have picked up on what they see as a double standard." — Brian Winter
Story Highlight:
“When people find out that they're related to someone they didn't know... and then they find out there's a estate involved, suddenly there are these inheritance claims…” — Ashley Eblin
Legal Complexities:
Advice & New Laws:
“States are grappling with how to rewrite laws to address this issue...” — Ashley Eblin
Major Developments:
"He... doesn't want them in our country... calling them garbage..."
Broader Impact:
Tennessee Special Election:
Mad Men on HBO Max:
This summary captures the episode’s complex reporting on U.S. policy in Latin America and at home, along with stories about the intersections of technology, law, and family—providing news context for listeners who may have missed the full show.