Loading summary
Transcript704 lines
- [00:00]
Podcast Announcer
This is an iheart Podcast iheart presents the Big three Playoffs this Sunday. The remaining four teams battle to make.
- [00:09]
Carl Casada
The championship in the most physical, fierce and competitive basketball league in the world.
- [00:13]
Podcast Announcer
The action starts with the big three Monster Energy celebrity game, then Dwight Howard and his LA Riot take on Montrez Harrell and Dr. J Chicago triplets. The finale will see popular Miami 305.
- [00:23]
Carl Casada
With stars MVP Michael Beasley and Lance.
- [00:25]
Podcast Announcer
Stevenson take on Nancy Lieberman's Dallas power who will make it to the big three championship.
- [00:29]
Carl Casada
The no holds barred action starts Sunday at 3P Eastern, 12 Pacific only on CBS.
- [00:36]
Podcast Announcer
If you're alignment in charge of keeping.
- [00:38]
Carl Casada
The lights on, Grainger understands that you.
- [00:40]
Andrew Sage
Go to great lengths and sometimes heights.
- [00:43]
Carl Casada
To ensure the power is always flowing. Which is why you can count on.
- [00:47]
Andrew Sage
Grainger for professional grade products and next day delivery.
- [00:51]
Podcast Announcer
So you have everything you need to.
- [00:53]
Carl Casada
Get the job done.
- [00:55]
Podcast Announcer
Call 1-800-granger.
- [00:56]
Andrew Sage
Click granger.com or just stop by Granger.
- [01:00]
Carl Casada
For the ones who get it done.
- [01:05]
Podcast Announcer
In 1920, a magazine article announced something incredible. Two young girls had photographed real fairies. But even more incredible, that article was written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the man who invented Sherlock Holmes. How did he fall for that? Hoax is a new podcast from me, Dana Schwartz, the host of Noble Blood, and me, Lizzie Logan. Every episode we'll explore one of the most audacious and ambitious tricks in history and try to answer the question why we believe what we believe. Listen to Hoax on the iHeartRadio app.
- [01:39]
Dana Schwartz
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [01:44]
Podcast Announcer
If you're looking for another heavy podcast about trauma, this ain't it. This is for the ones who had to survive and still show up as brilliant, loud, soft and whole.
- [01:54]
James Stout
The Unwanted Sorority is where black women.
- [01:56]
Podcast Announcer
Femmes and gender expansive survivors of sexual violence and rewrite the rules on healing.
- [02:01]
Dana Schwartz
Support and what happens after.
- [02:03]
Podcast Announcer
And I'm your host and co president of this organization, Dr. Lea Tritate.
- [02:07]
James Stout
Listen to the Unwanted Sorority New episodes.
- [02:10]
Podcast Announcer
Every Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [02:18]
James Stout
Media hey everybody, Robert Evans here and I wanted to let you know this is a compilation episode. So every episode of the week that just happened is here in one convenient and with somewhat less ads package for you to listen to in a long stretch. If you want. If you've been listening to the episodes every day this week, there's going to be nothing new here for you, but you can make your own decisions.
- [02:43]
Andrew Sage
Hello and welcome to It Could Happen Here and it could My name is Andrew Sage. I'm also answering on YouTube and I'm here once again with James, James Stout.
- [02:56]
James Stout
People have said I never say my last name and they can't work out who I am. So I guess I'll do that more.
- [03:02]
Andrew Sage
Welcome, James Stout.
- [03:03]
James Stout
Thank you.
- [03:04]
Andrew Sage
So lately, and I mean, this is an unfortunately common pattern of thought for me, but I've been thinking about just how totalizing this system feels. It's like everywhere you turn, you know, walking down the street, looking at the city, at pollution, every inch of land that's been claimed by the system, every bit of, you know, the way that you live and operate just feels like it's been manipulated and controlled in some way. And so that's really what I want to highlight in today's episode. The infrastructure of this system and how it's used to control, you know, both in terms of the physical infrastructure and the digital infrastructure of our lives. So I suppose to start off, I'd ask when was the last time that you noticed infrastructure shaping your choices?
- [04:00]
James Stout
That's interesting. I mean a lot in a certain way, right? Like. Like the infrastructure of labor shapes a lot of my choices. Like I have to work a lot to. To. To. To make ends meet. Right. Like, which means I can't do sometimes things I want to do. Like there are mutual aid efforts I'd like to participate in more that I'm not able to because I have this obligation to capital. I guess that's one of them. Or just the physical infrastructure limiting of the people I get to see. Right. There are places I love to go out there. Some really nice vegan places in Tijuana that I don't go to as much as I'd like because someone has built a giant wall and then another giant wall next to it and then stationed a bunch of people with guns to check if I have the right piece of paper to go back and forth to somewhere that otherwise I could ride my bike to.
- [04:50]
Andrew Sage
Yeah, borders are a very unfortunate and big one.
- [04:54]
James Stout
Yeah, yeah.
- [04:55]
Andrew Sage
It's really frustrating. And I think that's one of the most obviously detrimental aspects of physical infrastructure that sort of manipulates our lives today. I think on the digital level, there's things like just the way that social media is laid out, I think it really controls, like how much time you spend on it, how much energy you invest into it. And of course, even just our neighborhoods, our environments, our cities with their laid out, it tends to affect, you know, just how often we go out, where we go, what means of transportation we use. I mean, where physical infrastructure is concerned and how it's been used to control people, that goes way back into history. You know, colonial powers often built transport infrastructure, you know, like roads and railways and ports, with the very explicit purpose of extracting raw materials from the colonized territories to get to the imperial core.
- [05:52]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [05:53]
Andrew Sage
You know, the systems were not designed to serve the mobility needs of the local populations. They usually created direct lines from the mines and the plantations and the resource rich areas to the coastal ports where they could be exported.
- [06:05]
James Stout
Yeah, yeah.
- [06:06]
Andrew Sage
And so for the British imperialists and lovers of empire, they often brag that, you know, we built ports and we built bridges, and we built roads and we built railways. Well, it's the same pattern everywhere. You know, in India it was used to move cotton, tea and other resources from the interior to the shipping ports. In Ghana it was used to move gold and cocoa. But in any case, it wasn't to interconnect within the city. You know, the actual economic self determination of the people in that area didn't matter.
- [06:37]
James Stout
Yeah, very much so. I think about this, like I cycled around Rwanda 2020, which is an interesting time to be traveling, but I remember riding around and the Kenya, Rwanda word for dirt road is ikitaka. Right. And so that's what mostly we. So we cycled on these dirt roads. It was lovely. You know, we'd go through the village and everyone would come out and wave at you. And like, the little kids would come out and be like, what the fuck is this bicycle? And it was kind of fun, you know, and then we'd. We'd find someone. It's not really set up for like restaurants, so you just find someone and pay them an amount upon which you agreed, and they would give you some food. And that was a beautiful experience. And then there are these roads that they call Chinese roads that just go directly from the mine to the place where the raw material can be extracted. Because China is doing a lot of what you could generously call foreign direct investment or neocolonialism in lots of places in Africa. Right. And it was, the contrast between those two traveling experiences was so profound. Like, obviously you travel faster on the smooth roads, but like, you don't immerse yourself in the human experience of meeting and sharing that travel with people. Which is why I do these things in the first place. It was just such a profound contrast. I remember it really striking me at the time.
- [07:54]
Andrew Sage
Yeah. I mean, and this is what empires and rulers in general have been doing, right. They wield their control over labor to set Things up in a way that fulfills their interests.
- [08:08]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [08:09]
Andrew Sage
And then, you know, even when people gain some sort of nominal independence and they inherit these colonial infrastructure grids, or you know, they have investments coming in and they have set up, they have these companies, multinational companies, setting up infrastructure, it still continues. You know, this sort of extractivist and top down nature of the way the infrastructure is set up. You know, it doesn't reimagine all of them. Don't reimagine the logic of what came before, you know, in part for lack of funding and in part for lack of imagination. And so in a lot of places, the peripheral regions in these countries are still lacking in connectivity. They're still lagging behind the rest of the country. They still don't have access to some of the basic social services and resources that the urban core has, because the urban rural divide in many ways mimics the core periphery divide on the international stage. And then you have these neocolonial development aid programs coming in with the imf, the World bank, and you have even more infrastructure projects that just repeat this extractive pattern under the banner of development. Of course, real development would be connecting people, encouraging people to participate in society and distribute opportunity. But the infrastructure that tends to be set up is more so for consolidating state power and channeling the movement of people in predictable surveillable ways, and prioritizing access for certain populations while excluding or marginalizing others. So of course infrastructure development has the capacity to help people. You know, it can increase accessibility, people's lives easier, and it can also just manage and contain them and their resources. And we see a lot more examples of this sort of infrastructure for control. When you look at the class and racial dynamic within societies, those sorts of divisions and separations and stratifications, they of course manifest physically. You know, in the US you had literal segregation areas that were designated for black people, listening to, for white people, water fountains and neighborhoods and all these different things. You also had redlining policies. And nowadays you have spaces that were redlined and thus lacked investment and thus were neglected infrastructurally due to that racial and economic inequality. Those spaces are now ripe for development in the form of gentrification because the property is so cheap, so undervalued, and so the people who made something out of that lack are now being pushed out. And in South Africa, I mean, up until recently, these apartheid era policies created townships that were deliberately located far from white urban centers, that were lacking in services and transit options that physically reinforced the racial division of that society. And even today around the world, you have urban zoning laws and transit access limitations and public housing policies that recreates historical class divisions and racial divisions, ethnic divisions. And I'm sure you and your. With all the. I mean, every time I talk to you have like a new travel story to tell. I'm sure you've witnessed something like this.
- [11:47]
James Stout
Yeah, I was just thinking of how like, I was thinking, like, if we think about the Syrian state as a contiguous colony, right, like it's called the Syrian Arab Republic, but not all the people who are contained within the territory in which it once claimed the monopoly on violence are Arab people. So we think of the parts of north and east Syria with majority Kurdish areas as colonized. We can see that reflected in the infrastructure. Right. Part of that is, as you say, this sort of lack of investment. But then also part of it is every government funded building, right? Schools, hospitals, the buildings you go in to do the paperwork you have to do to exist under the state. They're set up like strong points. They're designed with a big kind of wall and then a big courtyard and then thick exteriors. They're designed to be militarily defensible against the people they're supposed to serve. Right? Like the school is designed to be used as a fucking machine gun position.
- [12:50]
Andrew Sage
Wow.
- [12:50]
James Stout
And once you see it, you see it everywhere and you think about the nature of the state that designs infrastructure with that explicitly in mind, right? It's fascinating. The other example I think of is like, Chris Elam's done some fantastic writing on the development of Barcelona. And you have like the unregulated working class raval, like this area just next to the Rambla, where the streets are just fucking small and winding and crazy. And there's never not laundry kind of over, you know, over your head. And it's a very. I like to go there. It's a place I enjoy. And then you have the ajample, which means extension, where the infrastructure is extremely. Like, it's probably one of the earlier grid cities that you would see. And the idea was that these overcrowded kind of what were in the 1920s and 30s slums would be where the working class would be kept. And the working class, to be clear, were seen as there was a colonial relationship between the bourgeois and the working class in Barcelona, because most of the working class were not Catalan. They would actually put signs at the top of these working class areas saying, Murcia begins here. Right? These are the Murcianos, the people from Murcia, the people from outside of Catalonia. Catalonia stops here, where the working class exist. That later reflected in their working class self identity. Like they came to refer to the raval as Chinatown, not specifically because of a high concentration of people from the Chinese diaspora, but because they'd seen Chicago gangster movies where Chinatown was like the area where the gangsters were and they were like, yeah, we're fucking gangster. Like, we're gonna call it Chinatown. You want to come in here, we'll fucking sh. Shoot you. Like, I thought that was this really fascinating, like, response to the way that they have been alienated by infrastructure.
- [14:40]
Andrew Sage
Yeah. I mean, and that's why when you. When you look at the sort of claims that. Oh, you know, it's just. It's just roads, it's just zoning, it's just a city grid. Yeah. It's just an embassy, it's just a government office. It's like, no, these sorts of spaces, these buildings, this infrastructure could never be neutral.
- [15:03]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [15:03]
Andrew Sage
And once you see that, you can't unsee it because you look at the amount of decisions it would have had to have gone into, you know, some of the examples you mentioned or the examples I mentioned, you know, the design decisions, it's like, okay, we're going to put this road here instead of here.
- [15:17]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [15:18]
Andrew Sage
We're going to use this material instead of this material. Who you employ to build those structures. That infrastructure also has an impact in the surrounding area. Are you employing people within the community? Employing people outside? What's happening there? Who's funding this infrastructure? Who's maintaining the infrastructure?
- [15:35]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [15:36]
Andrew Sage
What level of surveillance has been implemented? Where are the public transportation routes and why are they here, not there? You know?
- [15:44]
James Stout
Yeah, exactly. Like there's people whose opinions and views matter in that process and there are people who are excluded from it.
- [15:52]
Andrew Sage
Exactly.
- [15:53]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [15:54]
Andrew Sage
One of the authors that I tend to go back to often is Ivan Ilyich, because he critiqued a lot of this stuff, particularly infrastructure as control. In Tools for Conviviality, he spoke about how modern transport and urban design have been used to alienate people from their own bodies and communities. So he called out the usual suspects. Suburbanization, car centric infrastructure, how it isolates people and increases dependence on vehicles. And he called this dependence a radical monopoly because all the other choices have effectively been eliminated. Technically, you could walk along the highway, but you're not going to. You're gonna get a car. Yeah, right. You can't choose to walk or cycle in that sort of scenario.
- [16:38]
James Stout
Yeah. Well, someone's gonna call the Cops if you try that in America. Right.
- [16:42]
Andrew Sage
Yeah. So as Illich saw, it's really a cultural imposition that shapes how we end up living, interacting, moving, and it's frustrating. And on the global stage, you also see how infrastructure has the capacity to control the whole geopolitical board. You know, the Suez Canal, the Panama Canal, the Red Sea, the Strait of Hormuz, all these places have a lot of power militarily, trade wise, dramatically. Because they control the flow of oil or of goods or of data.
- [17:20]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [17:21]
Andrew Sage
Particularly in the areas where the undersea Internet cables run.
- [17:24]
James Stout
Oh, yeah.
- [17:25]
Andrew Sage
And so speaking of data, actually the realm of digital infrastructure is also very insidious when it comes to control. We tend to think of the Internet as that sort of ephemeral cloud. Right. But the cloud is hosted physically. You know, there are servers, there are fiber optic cables, there are data centers, all these things. They're not as obvious as roads and railways and, you know, neighborhoods, but they are just as. If not in some ways even more powerful in terms of controlling what people access, how fast they access it, under what terms they access it. Or because it's so intangible, it's so hard to pin down, it can often escape scrutiny. But there are companies that own these things. There's a small group of very powerful corporations that pretty much dictate how things are running. You know, most people, they know about China's great firewall and how it's used to cordon off China from the rest of the Internet in some ways. You know, it censors websites and search results, it monitors people's activity, and it usually has these state monitored alternatives to some of the popular global platforms like Google and Facebook.
- [18:38]
James Stout
Right.
- [18:39]
Andrew Sage
But Google and Amazon and Meta and Microsoft, it's not like they're any better. You know, they're not running things Republic. Good. So if you will call out what China is doing with the. With the great firewall, and I agree. I don't think that any government should have any control over what people access. But, you know, it's not like censorship. Data harvesting and surveillance are unique to China. You know, a lot of other governments, in collaboration with these companies, deploy soft censorship. You know, they derank things in the algorithm. They filter certain keywords, they selectively block certain things. Yeah, you have things that may be automatically flagged or moderated, and that often affects people from the LGBTQ community in countries where, you know, that's a big no, no. Or you have even the manipulation of language, the words people use as people try to get around Censors. Hence the proliferation of terms like grape and essay and self delete and unalive and all these other euphemisms, which, I mean, honestly, I don't use any of them. I despise them.
- [19:49]
Carl Casada
No.
- [19:50]
James Stout
Yeah, me too.
- [19:51]
Andrew Sage
The thing is, a lot of people assume that these words are censored on all platforms.
- [19:57]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [19:57]
Andrew Sage
But they're not. You know, they may be censored on one platform. Usually it's TikTok or limited in one platform. And then people take that sort of TikTok sort of way of speaking and spread it across the rest of the Internet, or worse yet, bring it into real life and end up saying things like unalive in real life.
- [20:16]
James Stout
Yeah, yeah, Evelyn, you have allowed TikTok's algorithm to determine the way you can express yourself.
- [20:23]
Andrew Sage
Exactly, exactly. And I mean, TikTok gets a lot of heat these days because, you know, rightfully so. It's very popular, it has a lot of influence, and it's, you know, very blatantly interventionist with its content.
- [20:36]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [20:37]
Andrew Sage
In some, you know, damaging ways. But again, the other big corporations are not immune either.
- [20:42]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [20:42]
Andrew Sage
I mean, Facebook was famously found culpable for genocide, Right?
- [20:47]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [20:48]
Andrew Sage
They played a major role in the sort of attitudes that were developing and the marginalization that was sort of targeting Rohingya community and the subsequent genocide.
- [21:00]
James Stout
Yeah. So I was on a panel with some Rohingya people the other day, and they are still a physical and technical infrastructure being marginalized. So something myself and my union friends are trying to do is help the Rohingya podcast initiative start podcasting. Right. Such that they can share their own voices with the world and their positions and their opinions. It's very important at a time when they're facing marginization, even from revolutionary forces within Myanmar, and we cannot sustain an Internet connection to allow them to do that. We tried to do a live panel, and it was very hard for. These guys were running around Cox's Bazaar where tens of thousands of Rohingya people live in refugee camps, trying to find connectivity. And, like, just another example of how they continue to be marginalized by the systems that first allowed them to be genocide.
- [21:55]
Andrew Sage
Exactly.
- [21:56]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [21:57]
Andrew Sage
Because the private corporations alone are not responsible for this, is the governments too, you know, and the corporations tell the government to do something, the governments comply. And then when the governments tell the corporations to do stuff, a lot of the time it's also like they comply. It's collaboration, you know, especially since the government has the power in a lot of cases to shut down the Internet when things are not going their way.
- [22:20]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [22:21]
Andrew Sage
You know, they have, they use the I'm all over and recently, you know, the suppression of dissenter in protests, you know, to influence elections or to restrict information, to obstruct journalism and communication during crises. When you look at all over the world, Iran, India, Sudan, Myanmar, Uganda, even in Gaza, in all these cases, these governments step in and they limit or they shut down the Internet entirely to prevent the news from getting out.
- [22:51]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [22:51]
Andrew Sage
You know, they could target either the entire Internet or they target certain platforms. They target WhatsApp, they target Twitter, they justify by saying, oh, they're going after fake news or there's a security threat.
- [23:02]
James Stout
Yeah, it's.
- [23:04]
Andrew Sage
But you know, we could see through that.
- [23:06]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [23:07]
Andrew Sage
And it's tough because I mean, this is where these are, these are the places where people have gathered. These are the online town squares, you know, and these, this infrastructure is very much centralized. Google controls most of the search on the Internet. Amazon dominates E commerce and cloud computing and logistics and Meta controls a lot of people's social interactions. And I could brag and say, oh well, I'm not on Facebook, but you know, I still use WhatsApp because everybody else uses WhatsApp.
- [23:40]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [23:41]
Andrew Sage
And it's, it's so easy for them because we're so concentrated on these platforms. It's so easy for them to puppet us, to flex their muscles and control the direction of public discourse.
- [23:52]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [23:53]
Andrew Sage
And I mean, it's amplifying certain things, suppressing other things, maximizing our engagement, exploiting our cognitive vulnerabilities, you know, polarizing discourse, distorted in reality. It's like, what the hell do we do?
- [24:10]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [24:11]
Andrew Sage
And so for the, the Hopium segment of the podcast, I just want to point out that, you know, infrastructure can be used to consolidate power and control people, but it can also be used to resist and to reclaim our collective agency. You know, even infrastructure that was originally designed to control can be taken under our control. You know, around the world, communities have been able to challenge these extractive logics to build their own infrastructures on their own terms. You know, in digital spaces, this might take the form of community built mesh networks or alternative Internet local servers. You know, you have projects like gui fi.net in Catalonia or you have the NYC mesh in New York. And these are efforts to engage in, you know, peer to peer and decentralized communications without the reliance on the telecom giants. And then you also of course, physically have examples of infrastructure resisting central control, participatory urban planning movements. You have guerrilla urbanism, you have, you Know, of course, the long and storied history of squatting, otherwise known as informal settlement. And these informal settlements are hubs of innovation in a lot of cases in places like Nairobi or in Rio de Janeiro, you know, these slums and favelas, they're hooking up their own electricity, hooking up their own Internet, hooking up their own water supply because they recognize that this is within their hands, this is within their capacity. You know, we don't have to have everything, you know, passed on to us from on high. You know, we can, you know, sort of reclaim our own voices and design our own spaces. If you're really interested in how infrastructure has the capacity to control and really just how states sort of see things, I have to, of course, recommend the classic James C. Scott Seen like a state. Yeah, I mean, it's just a foundational framework for understanding how infrastructure is used for social engineering. It's really readable as well. So definitely give that a read and, you know, think about ways that you can contribute to shaping the infrastructure around you. And I know, James, if you have any stories along this vein, you could leave us off with.
- [26:57]
James Stout
Yeah, I think of a ton, right. Like, even I think about, like, when I was a lot younger, I lived in a. I guess what you could call a slum of favela, like, a pretty economically disadvantaged part of Caracas for a little while. And, like, at the time, and I've seen this when I lived in Barcelona too, like. Like, I guess the English word would be info shop. They normally call them social centers would be the Spanish word or social spaces. And, like, it was cool to see. This is a city which is established through colonialism, right. And there was a brief time before things were terrible in Venezuela where people were trying to make. And largely it was people trying to make things better. And, like, the state for a time allowed a space for that to exist before it stopped allowing a space for that to exist, which is where we're at right now, right? And, like, very clearly the state right now is very repressive in Venezuela, to be clear. Like, I don't want to give. Put fuel on the tanky fire or whatever, but it was virtually a really beautiful thing. And it facilitated, right? I was like, 19. My Spanish was dog. I was hungry all the time. I didn't have any food, you know, but it facilitated that community taking care of me because the spaces were public and people could see if people were falling through the cracks. Right. And, like, I think a lot about refugee camps, obviously, that somewhere I've spent A decent amount of time. Right. Both within the U.S. and outside of the U.S. something I've been thinking about a lot recently is how so many of the people I met on the way to the United States in the Dalian, had horrific experiences in the Dalian and afterwards. But they also miss the community that they had. Like, they also miss the profound solidarity. I was just talking to people the other day who were telling me, like, when they were hungry in the jungle, strangers who didn't speak their language would try and give them food.
- [28:56]
Andrew Sage
Yeah, you see that in a lot of disasters too. This sort of explosion and mutual aid.
- [29:01]
James Stout
Yeah. And like a refugee camp is a place where you do not have privacy for the most part. And that's not always great, but it facilitates caring for one another. And like, I don't know, I have this recollection from seven or eight years ago now where I'm walking through a refugee camp in Mexico and there's a very little girl, six, seven, something like that. And I have long hair. People can't see me, but she likes to like, mess with my hair and braid it and shit. And I'm carrying this little girl and like, I've been coming for some time and like, the sense of community that you felt there amongst, like a really terrible situation. But, like, because everyone can see you walking down this little walkway, everyone's like, hi, how are you? Like, you know, like, I'm trying to work out what they, what they need and how we can best help. Like, I just remember thinking, like, what the fuck is wrong with? And then going back to, to the United States, right? And sitting in my little house and like, you know, you know, like, I'm fortunate to know my neighbors and to be close to them, but not many people are. And like, for most people, you know, that they, they get out the house, they go to their car, they drive to their work, they don't say hi to anyone. Like, it's so strange that like, in a sense, in those refugee camps, we were closer to the beautiful life that we want than we are in these million dollar homes in America. My house does not cost a million dollars. I don't own a house. But this, the profound alienation that we feel in part because of physical infrastructure, the ability of humanity to fall back into caring for one another, to like, that's what we, we do when we are not, like, physically and, and like, intellectually restrained from doing it by structures both both physical and digital and even emotional, that divide us from one another. And I've kind of thought about that ever since. Like, how do I build a place where people have more stability, people have privacy, people have their material needs met.
- [31:01]
Podcast Announcer
Yeah.
- [31:01]
Andrew Sage
Does you want to strike a balance? Infrastructure?
- [31:04]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [31:04]
Andrew Sage
I don't want. There's some cohorts and sort of plans that I've seen, for example, that don't even really factor in much privacy, which I'm not for at all. You know, people don't want to have to recreate their, their dorm room experience or in my case, they are sharing a bedroom, their entire childhood experience.
- [31:24]
James Stout
So yeah, this is. We need to have space for people to have privacy, but at the same time space for people to have community. And like cities can exist like that. Communities can exist like that. There's a theory of the Mediterranean public sphere that sometimes comes up where like again, in working class Barcelona. Right. People don't generally have air conditioning and it can get very hot, so you just spend a lot of time outside, balcony, whatever, you know, front porch if you've got one. That creates community. Right. That creates a public sphere. Like a place that is. It's not quite a home, but it's not controlled by someone else either. It's like a community space.
- [32:01]
Andrew Sage
Yeah.
- [32:02]
James Stout
And that doesn't exist in like, I don't live in the suburbs but like suburban America, you know, where everyone has these like literal fences around all the shit that they own.
- [32:14]
Andrew Sage
Yeah. That exists to vary an extent in Trinidad.
- [32:19]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [32:19]
Andrew Sage
You know, some areas are very much communal and other areas like are trying desperately to be America.
- [32:26]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [32:26]
Andrew Sage
In the nature. So yeah, it's kind of a mix of both worlds there. At the very least, from what I'm aware of, what I can tell people at least say hi to their neighbors though. Yeah, that's, that's still like a horrifying, you know, nightmarish sort of specter of.
- [32:43]
James Stout
Not knowing your neighbors thing that I.
- [32:45]
Andrew Sage
I've heard of, of American life that you don't even say hi.
- [32:48]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [32:50]
Andrew Sage
You know, you don't even wave at people like that.
- [32:52]
James Stout
Yeah, no, I, I'm always in my neighbors houses and they're always at my house and like I'm a person who, who owns a lot of tools, you know, like, like different spanners and stuff. So like I'm like, I will go out of my way to make sure that my neighbors know they can borrow my shit. And that does seem to be quite a new experience for people who are new in the neighborhood or whatever. But yeah, we should all do that. It's such an easy way to fight that alienation and that infrastructure that, you know, like, yeah, there's a wall between where I live and where the person next door lives, but I can knock on the door and say, hey, it looks like you're having some trouble with your truck. Do you need a hand or what have you.
- [33:35]
Andrew Sage
Mm, yeah. So, I mean, what you're saying is it could happen here.
- [33:44]
James Stout
Yeah, yeah, you gotta make. Make the good things happen here too, because enough of the fucking bad shit.
- [33:48]
Andrew Sage
Is indeed that's it for me, guys. All power to all the people.
- [33:55]
Podcast Announcer
PE. The reviews and ratings are in, and.
- [34:09]
Andrew Sage
Ice Cube's Big three is the surprise.
- [34:11]
Podcast Announcer
Hit of the summer. And to cap off the season, iHeart presents the Big Three basketball playoffs this.
- [34:17]
Carl Casada
Sunday at 3pm Eastern. The remaining four teams battle it out.
- [34:20]
James Stout
For the right to make the Big.
- [34:21]
Podcast Announcer
Three championship in the most physical, fierce.
- [34:23]
Carl Casada
And competitive basketball league in the world.
- [34:26]
Podcast Announcer
The action starts with the Big three Monster Energy celebrity game where your favorite stars compete in big three three on three basketball. Then the first of two semifinal games features Dwight Howard and the LA Riot.
- [34:36]
Carl Casada
Taking on Montrez Harrell and Dr. J's first place Chicago triplets.
- [34:40]
Podcast Announcer
The finale will see popular Miami 305 with stars MVP Michael Beasley and Lance will make you Dan Stevenson take on Nancy Lieberman's Dallas power, who finished the.
- [34:49]
Carl Casada
Season winning five straight weeks to capture second place.
- [34:52]
Podcast Announcer
Can Glenn Rice, Greg Monroe and Paul Millsap stop Miami's physical assault? Or will Miami and Beasley put an end to Dallas's winning ways?
- [35:00]
James Stout
Who will make it to the Big Three championship?
- [35:02]
Podcast Announcer
This no holds barred action starts Sunday at 3pm Eastern, 12 Pacific only on CBS.
- [35:09]
Dana Schwartz
In 1920, a magazine article announced something incredible.
- [35:14]
Podcast Announcer
Two young girls had photographed real fairies.
- [35:18]
James Stout
But even more extraordinary than the magazine.
- [35:20]
Podcast Announcer
Article'S claim was the identity of the man who wrote the article. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. The man who wrote Sherlock Holmes. Yes, the man who invented literature's most brilliant detective was fooled by two girls into thinking fairies were real. How did they do it? And why does it seem like so many smart people keep falling for outlandish tricks? These are the questions we explore in Hoax, a new podcast from me, Dana Schwartz, the host of Noble Blood, and me, Lizzy Logan. Every episode, we'll explore one of the most audacious and ambitious tricks in history, from the fake Shakespeares to balloon boys, and try to answer the question of why we believe what we believe. Listen to Hoax on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [36:15]
Dana Schwartz
Hey, guys, it's Az Fudd. You may know me as a gold medalist. You may know me as an NCAA National Champion and recent Most Outstanding player. You may even know me as a people's princess. But now you're also gonna know me as your favorite host. Every week on my new podcast, Fut around and Find Out, I'll give you.
- [36:32]
Podcast Announcer
An inside look at everything happening in.
- [36:34]
Dana Schwartz
My crazy life as I try to balance it all, from my travels across the globe to preparing for another run at the natty with my UConn husband skis, to just trying to make it to my midterms on time. You'll get the inside scoop on everything.
- [36:45]
Podcast Announcer
I'll be talking to some special guests.
- [36:47]
Dana Schwartz
About pop culture basketball and what it's.
- [36:50]
Podcast Announcer
Like to be a professional athlete on and off the court. You'll even get to have some fun with the Fudd family.
- [36:55]
Dana Schwartz
So if you follow me on social media or watch me on tv, you.
- [36:58]
Podcast Announcer
May think you know me, but this show is the only place where you.
- [37:02]
Dana Schwartz
Can really futt around and find out. Listen to Fut around and Find Out. A production of I Heart Was Women's Sports in partnership with Unanimous media on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever.
- [37:12]
Podcast Announcer
You get your podcasts. When I became a journalist, I was the first Latina in the newsrooms where I worked. I'm Maria Hinojosa.
- [37:21]
Dana Schwartz
I dreamt of having a place where.
- [37:23]
Podcast Announcer
Voices that have been historically sidelined would instead be centered. For over 30 years now, Latino USA has been that place. This is Latino USA, the radio journal of news and Cultura. As the longest running Latino news and culture show in the United Latino USA delivers the stories that truly matter to all of us. From sharp and deep analysis of the most pressing news, they're creating this narrative.
- [37:49]
Carl Casada
That immigrants are criminals.
- [37:51]
James Stout
This is about everyone's freedom of speech. Nobody expected two popes from the American.
- [37:57]
Podcast Announcer
Continent to stories about our cultures and our identities.
- [38:01]
Carl Casada
When you do get a trans character like Emilio Perez, the trans community's gonna.
- [38:05]
Dana Schwartz
Push back on that colorism.
- [38:07]
Podcast Announcer
All of these things like exist in.
- [38:09]
Dana Schwartz
Mexican culture and Latino culture.
- [38:10]
Podcast Announcer
You'll hear from people like Congresswoman aoc I don't want to give them my fear. I'm not going to give them my fear.
- [38:17]
Dana Schwartz
Listen to Latino USA as part of.
- [38:19]
Podcast Announcer
The My Cultura Podcast network, available on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [38:31]
Dana Schwartz
This is it could Happen here. The show about things falling apart. One thing falling apart last year, I guess the President's mental health. Seemingly so. And we're gonna talk about that Today and some possible ramifications that the current president may be trying to exploit to help him out. Robert Evans. Hello. How are you?
- [38:53]
James Stout
I'm fine. Is something wrong with the president?
- [38:55]
Dana Schwartz
The current one or the old one?
- [38:58]
James Stout
Any president ever. Has the president ever done wrong?
- [39:01]
Dana Schwartz
I heard some nasty things about Mr. Clinton.
- [39:04]
James Stout
Interesting. I woke up today for the first time, so this is all new to me.
- [39:08]
Dana Schwartz
Yeah, just don't, don't look on, like, the news or the Internet or anything, and it should be okay.
- [39:14]
James Stout
That's good. I'm just gonna start reading Wikipedia at the A section and see if I get to anything bad about a president.
- [39:22]
Dana Schwartz
So, since taking office, Trump has actually sort of been going soft on old sleepy Joe. Not out of the goodness of his own heart. Right. But to possibly explore legal options to get around some of the roadblocks Trump's been facing in the judicial branch.
- [39:40]
James Stout
Yeah, that makes sense.
- [39:42]
Dana Schwartz
Trump's been arguing that Biden himself was mostly absent, especially during the later half of his presidency. And a sort of, like, secret cabal of Cabinet members, DNC consultants, White House staff and aides were running a shadow presidency.
- [39:58]
James Stout
Yeah, and one of my constant takes is there are no secret cabals. There's a lot of cabals.
- [40:03]
Dana Schwartz
They're all very obvious, very public cabals.
- [40:05]
James Stout
Very public cabals.
- [40:07]
Dana Schwartz
But this, this secret cabal of, like, DNC interns were using Biden's signature via auto pen to set policy, make judicial appointments, and sign orders, all with little to zero awareness from. From poor, old, sick, sleepy Joe. In fact, people around Biden intentionally covered up his declining health to continue using his presidential power for their own progressive agenda.
- [40:35]
James Stout
If only they'd used it for that, and not just to keep getting paychecks.
- [40:39]
Dana Schwartz
Or sending bombs to Israel or.
- [40:41]
James Stout
Or sending bombs to Israel.
- [40:42]
Dana Schwartz
Many of the other. Many of the other things that Biden seemed preoccupied with. I'm going to play a clip from month and a half ago, Donald Trump, current president, explaining this conspiracy of the secret Joe Biden cabal.
- [40:58]
Podcast Announcer
I'm sure that he didn't know many of the things. Look, he was never for open borders. He was never for transgender, for everybody. He was never for men playing in women's sports. I mean, he changed. I mean, all of these things that changed so radically. I don't think he had any idea that what was. Frankly, I said it during the debate.
- [41:17]
James Stout
And I say it now.
- [41:18]
Podcast Announcer
He didn't have much of an idea what was going on, Mr. President. He shouldn't be. I mean, essentially, whoever used the auto pan was the president, and that is wrong.
- [41:29]
James Stout
It's illegal.
- [41:29]
Podcast Announcer
It's so bad, and it's so disrespectful to our country.
- [41:34]
Dana Schwartz
Transgender for everybody. The defining legacy of the Biden era. It's his core policy platform.
- [41:41]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [41:42]
Dana Schwartz
Okay.
- [41:44]
Podcast Announcer
I don't know.
- [41:44]
James Stout
Like, what do you even say at this point? Right? Like, honestly, he's sending troops into the second major city, this one, the capital, and taking over control of the police force. How much is it worth just being like, oh, and he said another thing that's not true. Like, I know it's important to cover all this, but also, like, man, I'm tired.
- [42:03]
Dana Schwartz
Oh, yeah. No, it's incredibly frustrating because they get to deploy these absurd little lines every once in a while, and it captures media attention, and the physical things that they're doing do not get as much, like, awareness.
- [42:17]
James Stout
And there's this constant, I think, misinterpretation as to, like, this is all a distraction from this and this and this. And it does sometimes function that way.
- [42:25]
Podcast Announcer
But this isn't.
- [42:25]
James Stout
They're not doing this because it's a distraction. They're doing this because they also hate this group of people. They also want to hurt this group of people. There's a lot of people they want to hurt, and they want to do it in different ways.
- [42:34]
Dana Schwartz
And they're kind of playing a longer game with the focus on this, quote, unquote, auto pen. And it remains to be seen if it's going to be successful or, you know, pay off for them. But I do want to talk about it now, since this is on, like, you know, month, like, four of them slowly seeding this into popular discourse. It's like a new thing, because every once in a while, they have to decide what the new thing is. Right. A few years ago, they decided it was trans people. They decided it was DEI. They decided it was how the 2020 election was stolen. They just decide that there's, like, some major problem, and then they repeat it often enough that it becomes, like, something that seemingly a share of voters actually care about. And they're trying to make auto pen be a thing, and there is actual, like, possible results of them focusing on this as. As we. As we will see. But the auto pen fixation started this past March when Trump posted a truth on Truth Social, claiming that Biden's preemptive pardons of members of the January 6th Investigation House Committee are, quote, hereby declared void, vacant, and of no further force of effect because of the fact that they were done by auto pen, unquote.
- [43:43]
James Stout
Great.
- [43:44]
Dana Schwartz
This is not real. This is not. This is not like a real thing that he can just claim on. On Truth Social.
- [43:51]
James Stout
But what's real?
- [43:52]
Dana Schwartz
You know, there is no requirement that pardons even be signed, only that they're accepted by a subject. In 1929, the US Solicitor General concluded in a memo that, quote, neither the Constitution nor any statute prescribes the method by which executive clemency shall be exercised or evidenced. So he can't just do this here, but this was kind of the opening of the door for the rest of what we're going to talk about this episode. And I guess before we get into that, I should talk about what an auto pen is. An auto pen is a tool to automate the signing of documents by replicating a signature. And this is a machine or a type of machine that's long been used in the White House. Thomas Jefferson bought and used an early iteration of such a device. Shortly after it was patented in 1803, Lyndon B. Johnson's auto pen was photographed in the White House for a National Enquirer recover story titled the Robot that Sits in for the President. And it's funny that now you get Fox News headlines that are basically written very similarly, talking about how actually a robot or the auto pen itself was acting as president. And that's like a controversy, okay. Versus it was just like a fun news story back in the 50s.
- [45:02]
James Stout
How many of the guys angry about this literally want an LLM to be the president?
- [45:06]
Dana Schwartz
Yes, exactly.
- [45:08]
James Stout
That's.
- [45:08]
Podcast Announcer
That's.
- [45:08]
James Stout
That's my question.
- [45:10]
Dana Schwartz
No, at least. At least half. At least half. The other half don't know what an LLM is.
- [45:15]
James Stout
No.
- [45:17]
Dana Schwartz
Now, Obama was the first president to openly sign legislation with an auto pen, including the extension of the patriot act in 2011 while at the G8 summit in France. And though the constitutionality of the auto pen has never been tested or explicitly determined in court, in 2005, President George W. Bush asked the Justice Department for its opinion on the validity of the auto pen for signing legislation and other official policy documents. The Office of Legal Counsel found that, quote, the President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law. Rather, the President may sign a bill by directing a subordinate to affix the President's signature to such a bill, for example, by auto pen, unquote. Though there still is debate whether the President needs to be physically present during this process or simply authorize the signing. And you know, you have people like Stephen Miller in this administration who try to find niche little laws or statutes to then apply in a way that was probably never designed, or we have since these laws inceptions have decided not to use the laws in that way because that doesn't make sense for our current context. But someone like Miller very willing to do such a thing. And there could be, for instance, some obscure aspect or interpretation of like, proxy signature laws that they could try to like, force through into their interpretation of like, Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution, which might make some auto pen signatures invalid. But this is something that's like, kind of dismissed in a lot of legal circles because as like a practical matter, it would be disastrous to start rescinding executive actions based on this interpretation because, like, decades and decades of laws and regulations would then fall into question and possibly become void. So lots of people just like, kind of don't think this is like a real question or a real concern. And part of me thinks that as well. But as like someone like Miller has demonstrated, they're absolutely willing to use like, niche arguments or precedents to do some pretty, like, crazy stuff. You know what is not very crazy, Robert?
- [47:21]
James Stout
Paying money to the sponsors of this show.
- [47:23]
Dana Schwartz
It's an extremely reasonable act.
- [47:25]
James Stout
It's the only sane thing you can do. If you do anything else, you are being 5150'd and you'll be on an involuntary 72 hour hold. That's the way the law works.
- [47:44]
Dana Schwartz
All right, we are back. So with this Biden auto pen thing, it's not really about the auto pen. The auto pen actually is not the problem here kind of at all. That's not what they're really focusing on. In early June, the Justice Department launched an investigation into Biden's alleged use of the auto pen, with the DOJ pardon attorney Ed Martin writing in an email that this investigation is to determine whether Joe Biden was, quote, competent and whether others were taking advantage of him through use of the auto pen or other means, unquote, with a specific focus on the preemptive pardons for members of Biden's family and clemency for 37 death row inmates whose sentences were converted to life in prison. So this is, this is the real crux. Whether Biden was competent and whether people were using the auto pen without his knowledge. And I think the reason why they're, they're starting by focusing on these pardons, whether for January 6th investigation committee members or for those close to Biden. Like, this all relates to Trump's campaign promise of, like, retribution Right. You can think of Cash Patel's list of deep state actors that he wants to investigate. Like, that was such a core part of what Trump campaigned on. And he does still seem keen on fulfilling, like, parts of that promise. Now, Ed Martin, the DOJ pardon attorney investigating this auto pen debacle himself, has said that the President's pardon power is absolute and that using the auto pen is, quote, not necessarily a problem. But I think that the core part here is that it's not about the auto pen itself. It's about this secret cabal who are using the auto pen without Biden's knowledge.
- [49:22]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [49:22]
Dana Schwartz
So a few days after this investigation was announced, the White House released a public memo from Trump entitled reviewing certain Presidential actions, which ordered the Attorney General and the White House counsel to investigate, quote, whether certain individuals conspired to deceive the public about Biden's mental state and unconstitutionally exercise the authorities and responsibilities of the President. And this document reads like something I would read on, like a conspiracy theory website five years ago. It's written in a very similar style. Quote, President Biden's aides abused the power of presidential signatures through the use of an auto pen to conceal Biden's cognitive decline and assert Article 2 authority. This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history. The American public was purposely shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to affect radical policy shifts, unquote. The memo states that Biden's advisors, quote, unquote, tried to hide the true extent of his mental decline to, quote, cover up his inability to discharge his duties, unquote. The investigation specifically wants to look into which policy documents were signed via auto pen and who ordered the President's signature to be affixed to said documents. One other quote from the memo, quote, the White house issued over 1200 presidential documents, appointed 235 judges to the federal bench, and issued more pardons and commutations than any administration in United States history. Although the authority to take these executive actions, along with many others, is constitutionally committed to the President, there are serious doubts as to the decision making process and even the degree of Biden's awareness of these actions being taken in his name. Given clear indications that President Biden lacked the capacity to exercise his presidential authority, if his advisors secretly used the mechanical signature pen to conceal this incapacity while taking radical executive actions all in his name, that would constitute an unconstitutional wielding of the power of the presidency, a circumstance that would have implications for the legality and validity of numerous executive actions undertaken in Biden's name, unquote. So though the 2005 Bush DOJ memoir does support the use of the auto pen to affix the President's signature, obviously it still must be the president who decides to sign a document.
- [51:50]
James Stout
Right?
- [51:50]
Dana Schwartz
With the Office of Legal Counsel memo stating, quote, we do not question the substantial authority supporting the view that the president must personally decide whether to approve and sign bills. This is pretty obvious. And that's why so much of the auto pen investigations are around Biden's deteriorating mental state and not the auto pen itself. Itself. It's about trying to prove whether Biden was either not mentally capable of sufficiently authorizing a signature to be affixed to certain documents or was just completely unaware that the auto pen was signing certain documents with White House advisors specifically covering up Biden's mental decline to take advantage of his compromised state to personally direct policy. And that's what the investigations are going to try to prove. The White House is already making repeated assertions that this was the case and this question may be finally settled and in a Trump sympathetic court. And Republicans are currently trying every angle of attack on this. Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson has started a Senate investigation and a House Oversight Committee investigation is already up and running. The past month, Kentucky Republican James Comer has been subpoenaing Biden admin officials to testify on the use of the auto pen and Biden's mental faculties while in office. Comer's own letters and subpoenas for this investigation have been signed with a digital signature because this is such a common practice in Washington and like all over the country now.
- [53:16]
James Stout
Right.
- [53:16]
Dana Schwartz
Try to think of all the official documents you sign on your computer. Right?
- [53:20]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [53:20]
Dana Schwartz
Now, metadata from a subpoena cover letter sent to former senior advisor to the first Lady Anthony Bernal showed the document was authored and signed by someone named Benzene, an Oversight Committee staffer, not James Comer, because again, this is pretty regular. So even the investigators are doing this process themselves while doing the investigation. Part of the reason why the Republicans are trying to make this a continuing story and not just about, you know, the pardons, is because as like Biden appointee judges began blocking Trump's executive orders, the focus on the auto pen turned from just pardons towards use of the auto pen to nominate federal judges. And this is where things get a lot more slippery. Last month, Fox News asked House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer if not just pardons may be found to be null and void. Because of the results of this investigation, but possibly also judicial appointments.
- [54:19]
Podcast Announcer
Biden made 228 judicial appointments, including 45 appeals court and 187 district court judges. And most importantly, Biden appointed Justice Kachanji Brown Jackson, the court's most long winded justice who couldn't even define what a woman is. Mr. Chairman, you mentioned that you're looking at some of the pardons that were done under President Biden and the use of the auto pen, Dr. Fauci being one of them, talking about whether they were legitimate or not. Are you also looking into Biden's judicial appointments as well? Absolutely. Everything that was signed with the auto pen, especially in the last year of the Biden presidency. This is when all the books that are being written, all the tell all interviews that are being recorded from his former disgruntled staffers and staffers who are trying to preserve their reputation for future employment, they're all saying that Joe Biden was in a deep mental decline and that he was protected by a very small inner circle. We brought a few of those people in the inner circle and asked them simple questions like were you ever told to lie about the President's health? And they couldn't answer that question. They had to plead the fifth to avoid self incrimination. This raises an issue whether these pardons, whether these judicial appointments and whether these executive orders are legal. I believe that if this investigation keeps going in the way that it's going, that's going to raise serious concerns about whether or not Joe Biden even knew what was going on around him, much less whether he authorized the use of his signature on all of this stuff. I think all of these are in jeopardy of being declared null and void in a court of law. And that's a big deal for the Trump administration because so much of what Trump is up against in court now would with these liberal biased Biden appointed judges is the fact that they're using and citing some of these executive orders as reason to throw out President Trump's agenda and President Trump's executive orders. So they tried to Trump proof the administration on the way out the door. And the problem they've got now is the American people realize that Joe Biden wasn't the one calling the shots. And he, he may very well have not even been mentally fit to make decisions to authorize the use of his.
- [56:38]
Andrew Sage
Auto pen, if he even authorized it.
- [56:40]
Podcast Announcer
So this is going to play out in a court of law. I think our investigation is going to be a substantial part of evidence in it and that's why we're doing the investigation.
- [56:50]
James Stout
Yeah, that's the rub right there. That's exactly what they want. Right. Is to completely peel back the last administration or two of judges and make. Make it just be all their people, a whole justice system that they completely control.
- [57:04]
Dana Schwartz
If they could recall like 230 federal judges.
- [57:08]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [57:09]
Dana Schwartz
And fill in 230 more like Trump appointed judges, that would clear out so much of the, like, legal roadblocks that they're currently facing.
- [57:19]
James Stout
Yep.
- [57:20]
Dana Schwartz
And that is the real crux of their focus on this issue. That's why they're trying to, like, insert this into reality and they're throwing this auto pen story, like, everywhere. Even the Epstein files, which don't exist, were concocted by the ever suspicious auto pen.
- [57:35]
James Stout
It's a hoax that's been built up way beyond proportion. I can say this.
- [57:39]
Podcast Announcer
Those files were run by the worst scum on earth. They were run by Comey, they were run by Garland, they were run by Biden. And all of the people that actually ran the government, including the auto pen.
- [57:56]
Dana Schwartz
Whatever the current big news story is, they're going to try to shove the auto pen in there because that's how they operate. That's how they craft reality. Okay, we are back. So, needless to say, Biden and his advisors have denied all of this. And it's a little tricky because part of what makes this story slightly compelling for Trump's team is that obviously Biden's mental health was in decline for the past few years of his presidency. We all saw that happen. That is like a accepted part of our country's history. Now. We all, we all saw the debate. And so much of their argument for this is resting on how much everyone understands that you have a whole bunch of former White House staff writing books on this topic now. So with that aspect in mind, they still have to defend the use of the auto pen and Biden's competency and awareness of all of the decisions being made to do this. Last month had his first interview with the New York times since, like 2021, where he discussed how he gave oral authorization for all of the pardons, with the auto pen operation specifically being managed by the staff secretary, Stefan Feldman. He said, quote, I made every decision. Biden said that the White House used the auto pen specifically for the last batch of pardons. Biden said that they used the auto pen because of the high number of pardon warrants issued, totaling around 4,000, which affected three categories of federal convicts, people serving home confinement, nonviolent drug offenders and people on death row. He did not choose or approve, like, every single name on that list, but claims to have determined the criteria and categories, saying, quote, I was deeply involved. I laid out a strategy, how I want to go about these, dealing with pardons and commutations. I pulled the team in to say, this is how I want to get it done generically. And then specifically, unquote. In preparation for the final months of the Biden presidency, his White House counsel wrote an email to staff in, like, November of 2024, laying out the process for reviewing pardons. The last step being, quote, the President makes the final decision on the final pardon and, or the commutation slate, unquote. At this point, around a dozen people have been subpoenaed and are giving testimony. And the investigation is looking through emails from the time specifically starting with these pardons, because I think that's the only way they have to, like, investigate this. Right now. It's easier to investigate the pardons from the last three months of the presidency than just all of the documents signed over the course of, like, four years or even just two years, if you look at, like, the past two years of his presidency. So specifically, they're focusing on the final pardons as like, a way in to figure out the process for how the auto pen was functioning and who was using it. And they may try to extend that process out to things like judicial appointments over time. I think trying to rescind the appointment of someone like a Supreme Court justice, very unlikely because obviously Biden had awareness that that was going on, but they might try to pull more fucky shit with the, you know, circuit court appointments or that kind of stuff. I don't think this is, like, the most important story facing the country right now. Obviously, the stuff going on in Washington, D.C. and many other aspects of how the Trump administration is. Is operating with. With ICE and with trans people affects people more immediately. But I've been specifically trying to pull information on how they're crafting this narrative around the autopan ever since he made that first truth back in March, because I saw this as a ongoing reality crafting project which might cumulate in something actually meaningful over time. And none of these investigations have released their findings yet, and they're not expected to for at least a few more weeks to months. But it's something that I think is worth keeping an eye on right now, especially considering, you know, Miller and others and like, the Heritage Foundations focus on trying to find niche loopholes in which executive power can be really exercised. And if One of the ways to remove some of the roadblocks towards this president's executive power is to undermine the executive power of a previous administration. It would be the first time we see that strategy actually enacted. And it sounds like kind of cartoonish, but that's so much of what they're currently doing is pushing everything to that extreme, trying to test all of these more niche theories that you see people talking about. In the past. Like around 2011, when Obama first signed legislation with the auto pen, you had a whole bunch of libertarians complaining that this is unconstitutional because he wasn't physically present when the document was being signed. And so you have like think pieces on that at the time that then kind of get memory hold. And now you're going to see some of those justifications back again and actually try to test them out in court. Especially if you have a Justice Department investigation, you have an Attorney General investigation, you have a Senate investigation and a House investigation. If one of those can stumble onto or develop or invent some compelling argument, we will actually see versions of this complaint be tested in a way that we never have before. Because it would be like, disastrous to the functional aspect of the state. If you, if you determine that all presidential documents signed via auto pen are not valid unless the President's in the room, that would be a massive domino tipping over, which, you know, most reasonable people who work in government, like elder statesmen, are not going to want to do that because that sounds like a fucking nightmare. Like, legally speaking, and it would be like, disastrous, like it would destroy some fundamental aspects of the government. But right now, destroying aspects of government is kind of the point. That's what we saw with doge. That's what we saw during the first few months of the presidency. Using this kind of tech startup thought process behind running a government, you have to break things first so that you can rebuild it in a way that suits you better. And if that means stripping away 200 federal judges to put in 200 of your own, that would have massive benefits for them. And I think that's part of why they're having this focus right now.
- [64:12]
James Stout
Oh yeah.
- [64:13]
Dana Schwartz
That's kind of all I have on that. So unless you have some closing thoughts. No, I mean, of course, this is.
- [64:19]
James Stout
The game as laid out in not just Project 2025, but what the right has been talking about my entire life. Like, none of this should be surprising if you've been paying attention. The only reason why some people are surprised is that there's folks in the Democratic hierarchy who have been saying for years. This isn't really what conservatives want. This is just a fringe. Right?
- [64:41]
Dana Schwartz
There is no fringe anymore.
- [64:43]
James Stout
They'll never actually do this. They can't do this. The system doesn't work that way. There's just been this belief that this can't happen. Right. It can't happen. Or that like, if it did, obviously, you know, the, the cops will stop them, the FBI will stop them, the, the army will stop them. And there's a reason why they've went out of their way to gain control of all of those organizations before doing this. So, yeah, I mean, you cannot, we can either pretend that someone's going to stop them and you don't have to worry about it, or just accept that we are where we are and there may be some unprecedented things that need to be done. Yep, that's all I'll say. Legally, that's all I should say.
- [65:29]
Dana Schwartz
That's the episode. Bye. Bye, everyone.
- [65:31]
Podcast Announcer
Okay, cool. The reviews and ratings are in and.
- [65:45]
Andrew Sage
Ice Cube's Big three is the surprise.
- [65:47]
Podcast Announcer
Hit of the summer. And to cap off the season, iheart presents the big three basketball playoffs. This Sunday at 3pm Eastern.
- [65:54]
Carl Casada
The remaining four teams battle it out.
- [65:56]
James Stout
For the right to make the Big.
- [65:57]
Podcast Announcer
Three championship in the most physical, fierce.
- [65:59]
Carl Casada
And competitive base basketball league in the world.
- [66:01]
Podcast Announcer
The action starts with the Big three Monster Energy celebrity game where your favorite stars compete in big three three on three basketball. Then the first of two semifinal games features Dwight Howard and the LA riot.
- [66:12]
Carl Casada
Taking on Montrez Harrell and Dr. J's first place Chicago triplets.
- [66:16]
Podcast Announcer
The finale will see popular Miami 305.
- [66:18]
Carl Casada
With stars MVP Michael Beasley.
- [66:20]
Podcast Announcer
And last will make you Dan Stevenson take on Nancy Lieberman's Dallas Power, who.
- [66:25]
Carl Casada
Finished the season with winning five straight weeks to capture second place.
- [66:28]
Podcast Announcer
Can Glenn Rice, Greg Monroe and Paul Millsap stop Miami's physical assault? Or will Miami and Beasley put an end to Dallas winning ways?
- [66:36]
James Stout
Who will make it to the big three championship?
- [66:38]
Podcast Announcer
This no holds barred action starts Sunday at 3pm Eastern, 12 Pacific.
- [66:42]
James Stout
Only on CBS.
- [66:44]
Podcast Announcer
Have you ever looked at a piece of abstract art or music or poetry and thought that's just a bunch of pretentious nonsense?
- [66:50]
James Stout
Well, that's exactly what two bored Australian.
- [66:53]
Podcast Announcer
Soldiers set out to prove during World War II when they pulled off what.
- [66:57]
James Stout
Was either a bold literary hoax or.
- [66:59]
Podcast Announcer
A grand poetic experiment, publishing over a dozen intentionally bad but highly acclaimed works of expressionist poetry under the name Ern Malley. In an incident that caused a media firestorm and even a criminal trial, the Ern Malley episode made fools of believers and critics alike, and still fascinates poetry lovers to this day. We break down the truth, the lies, and the poetry in between on Hoax, a new podcast hosted by me, Lizzy Logan and me, Dana Schwartz.
- [67:27]
Dana Schwartz
Every episode, Hoax explores an audacious fraud.
- [67:30]
Podcast Announcer
Or ruse from history, from forged artworks to the original fake news. To try and answer why we believe, listen to Hoax on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [67:43]
Dana Schwartz
Hey guys, it's Az Fudd. You may know me as a gold medalist. You may know me as an NCAA National Champion and recent Most Outstanding player. You may even know me as a people's prince. But now you're also going to know me as your favorite host. Every week on my new podcast, Fut around and Find Out, I'll give you.
- [68:01]
Podcast Announcer
An inside look at everything happening in.
- [68:03]
Dana Schwartz
My crazy life as I try to balance it all. From my travels across the globe to preparing for another run at the natty with my UConn Huskies, to just trying to make it to my midterms on time. You'll get the inside scoop on everything.
- [68:14]
Podcast Announcer
I'll be talking to some special guests.
- [68:16]
Dana Schwartz
About pop culture, basketball and what it's like to be a professional athlete on.
- [68:20]
Podcast Announcer
And off the court. You'll even get to have some fun with the Fudd family.
- [68:23]
Dana Schwartz
So if you follow me on social media or watch me on tv, you.
- [68:27]
Podcast Announcer
May think you know me, but this.
- [68:29]
Dana Schwartz
Show is the only place where you can really fudd around and find out. Listen to Fudd around and find out. A production of iHeart Women's Sports in.
- [68:36]
Podcast Announcer
Partnership with Unanimous Media on the iHeartRadio.
- [68:38]
Dana Schwartz
App, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [68:44]
Podcast Announcer
When I became a journalist, I was.
- [68:46]
Dana Schwartz
The first Latina in the newsrooms where I worked.
- [68:48]
James Stout
I'm Maria Hinojosa.
- [68:50]
Dana Schwartz
I dreamt of having a place where.
- [68:51]
Podcast Announcer
Voices that have been historically sidelined would instead be centered. For over 30 years now, Latino USA has been that place. This is Latino USA, the radio journal of News and cultura. As the longest running Latino news and culture show in the United States, Latino USA delivers the stories that truly matter to all of us. From sharp and deep analysis of the most pressing news, they're creating this narrative.
- [69:18]
Carl Casada
That immigrants are criminals.
- [69:20]
James Stout
This is about everyone's freedom of speech. Nobody expected two popes from the American.
- [69:26]
Podcast Announcer
Continent to stories about our cultures and our identities.
- [69:29]
Carl Casada
When you do get a trans character like Emilia Perez, the trans community is.
- [69:33]
Dana Schwartz
Going to push back on that colorism. All of these things that exist in Mexican culture and Latino culture.
- [69:39]
Podcast Announcer
You'll hear from people like Congresswoman aoc. I don't want to give them my fear. I'm not going to give them my fear.
- [69:45]
Dana Schwartz
Listen to Latino USA as part of.
- [69:47]
Podcast Announcer
The My Culinary Tura podcast network, available on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or.
- [69:52]
Dana Schwartz
Wherever you get your podcasts.
- [70:00]
James Stout
Hello and welcome to the show. It's me, James, today, and I'm very fortunate to be joined by friend of the show, Carl Casada. How you doing, Carl?
- [70:08]
Carl Casada
Oh, I'm doing great. And when I hear friend of the show with. With any of you all, or you, James, it's a real honor to me. So I'm, I'm honored to be your friend and a friend of the show. So I'm glad to be here.
- [70:17]
James Stout
No, thank you. We, we always appreciate you being here and everything you do within range. Carl, we're not here to talk about gun stuff today, actually, which is nice in a way because we're here to talk about something which is also very important. Right. In terms of keeping people safe, and that is activism against, like, corporate destruction of our environment. We're here to talk about something called Project Blue. Specifically, can you explain to listeners who are not familiar, folks who maybe, you know, haven't heard about it, what Project Blue. Blue was proposed to be?
- [70:46]
Carl Casada
Yeah, and I. It's not dead either. We'll talk about that more. But Project Blue was a.
- [70:51]
Podcast Announcer
Is.
- [70:52]
Carl Casada
Was. We'll see a 290 acre data center project. Put that in scope. 290 acres.
- [70:59]
Dana Schwartz
Whoa.
- [71:00]
Carl Casada
Data center south of Tucson through a company called Beal Infrastructure that through people's hard work came to find out it was for Amazon. But a 290 acre AI data center south of Tucson.
- [71:15]
James Stout
Yeah. That is vast. I'm trying to think of a. Like, I can't think of a comparison for 290 acres, but that is a huge amount of, like, computing power. Right.
- [71:25]
Carl Casada
I guess it's hard to fathom that kind of space when you think about it.
- [71:29]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [71:29]
Carl Casada
There are maps of what this proposed data center's footprint is. And if you take the rough rectangle of it and place it over Tucson proper, the city of Tucson that it's. They propose it to be just south of it pretty much envelops and it consumes the entire downtown of Tucson in multiple neighborhoods. That's how big this is. And it's one data center.
- [71:52]
James Stout
Yeah. What was the data center supposed to do? Like, what if people aren't familiar? Right. Like, what does a data center do? What do they do with the big computer.
- [71:59]
Carl Casada
Well, okay, so for people that aren't really into the tech sector of things, a data center is essentially think of something the size of a bigger than a mall that has nothing but giant computer data banks in it. So it's a giant place where you would think of your old mainframes in the old days, not mainframes anymore, but it's racks and racks and racks of computing power and connectivity to the Internet for the purposes of whatever Amazon would want to do with this. So if you go to use Amazon's infrastructure or use their AI, that buzz phrase that now is everywhere, the computers that do those things or those requests or decide what products they want to market to through their algorithm, that's what these data centers do. So it's essentially an entire city of just machines. Yeah, a techropolis is an interesting way to put it. Not a necropolis, a tech propolis. So imagine a few people maintaining an entire city of machines.
- [72:54]
James Stout
Right. And actively participating in undermining the value of labor for everyone else with this AI shit.
- [73:00]
Carl Casada
Well that's part of this project we're going to get into a minute is one of the things they to propose is that it's going to bring jobs, but only at the beginning. And we'll talk about that more.
- [73:08]
James Stout
Yeah, yeah. Well let's talk about like people in Tucson did not want this data center, right? Like there was a broad based and well organized opposition to it. So perhaps we should explain like why? Why? Why? I mean I guess people listen to this podcast, are inclined to think data center bad, but can you explain the impact that this would have had on the city and the surrounding area?
- [73:28]
Carl Casada
Oh yeah, absolutely. So it's very interesting to me to think about. So these data centers of this accord are. If you, if you're interested in this topic and stu start googling, you're going to find that this is of course not the first large or mega data center that's been implemented across this country. There's a number of them in Texas and they are belching large amounts of pollution into the environment. Cities nearby get absolutely destroyed by it. Typically they're brought in through some sort of tax incentives by the local city council or local county. And so that's exactly what was happening here with Tucson. So the local city council was pretty friendly to the idea of they were talking to this Beale infrastructure to bring in Project Blue. They were giving tax cuts, they were giving all these incentives to bring this gigantic megalithic thing into the, into just south of town. And part of the insidiousness of this is that this was going to go forward until someone noticed it. Yeah, it was just going to happen. All of a sudden one day this thing is there. Right. But it was noticed. And I don't honestly know exactly how it got noticed, but it got noticed. And one of the things I really find interesting, historically speaking, is how certain places and cultures resonate over time with historical events from the past. Tucson historically is an interesting place in terms of its environmental activism. There's a number of things that happened in Tucson in the 1960s. There were groups that were actively fighting the spread of highways and highway infrastructure. So they were anti freeway. And their reasoning and rationale was it that freeways were the arterial infrastructure that allowed for the destructive spread of tract home developments. So the way to help one way is it is to prevent the destruction of the local environment. And the spread of a city was to diminish its freeway footprint. And I think you can see this is true. If you look at any big city now, like Phoenix is essentially a hive city. And all of the growth comes because of freeways.
- [75:23]
James Stout
Right. Because people can get to work or whatever quickly. And so you get commuters, suburbs.
- [75:29]
Carl Casada
One thing that's always was interesting when I was doing more work in infosec, when people talk. This does make sense. By the way. This is going to sound off topic. I was talking to the information security architect for McDonald's.
- [75:39]
James Stout
Wow.
- [75:39]
Carl Casada
And we were working with them on putting together a. This is why this is interesting. Me as a data center thing. I used to do a lot of this work. They were talking about putting in a very secure and encrypted data center for the purposes of protecting their intellectual property. And I was talking to this guy, I was like, what is this, like your recipes or what is it you. It's a McDonald's protects.
- [75:57]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [75:58]
Carl Casada
And this was wild. No, they don't care about the recipes. They were protecting their software that determines where they should buy the next piece of real estate to put a McDonald's. McDonald's is actually a real estate company. And this, I have seen this in real time with my life because I've lived in a very remote part of the Arizona desert, the frontier, for lack of a better term, of Arizona for a long time. And the first thing that popped up in this one little area in the middle of nowhere was a McDonald's. And now everywhere you see a McDonald's show up someplace that seems a little weird. Give it a few years and it's suddenly the epicenter of a new tract home.
- [76:31]
Podcast Announcer
Development.
- [76:31]
James Stout
Oh. So they're like they have some unique algorithm to determine.
- [76:36]
Carl Casada
They figure that out and the McDonald's is the first thing they own. Usually a gas station and a McDonald's and it ostensibly just looks like, oh, this is a place to stop, take a leak and buy a burger. No, they buy all the land around it and then they start selling or leasing that to other businesses as the growth happens. That's a big part of how the McDonald's corporation makes its main money.
- [76:56]
James Stout
Fascinating. Yeah.
- [76:57]
Carl Casada
And so aligned with. You put a freeway. When you see a freeway suddenly show up in the middle of nowhere, someone has a goal to put a giant tract home development out there and sprawl that city a little more. So anyways, going back to the original topic, these people in Tucson in the 60s were anti freeway and they actively changed the way Tucson grew. And I think it's one of the major reasons Tucson, if you've ever been to Tucson versus Phoenix and is a very different, culturally different vibe of Phoenix. 1. It doesn't sprawl the same.
- [77:28]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [77:28]
Carl Casada
And it still has stuff that isn't strip malls. It actually has locally owned businesses. It actually has some community resources. Not all of it's tracked home and strip malls. And I think a lot of that is because of that freeway activism.
- [77:41]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [77:42]
Carl Casada
Also you look back in Tucson's past. Love him or hate him, or somewhere in between. The somewhat infamous author Edward Abbey lived in Tucson and wrote the Monkey Wrench Gang and wrote a lot of environmental activism. He had a lot of views that were kind of deplorable. But when it came to climate and when it came to the environment, he was pretty on point. And his work spawned an organization called Earth First. Which was one of the. Not the first, but one of the most famous direct. We're talking direct action, climate, active or clogged. You know, they were the ones that were.
- [78:14]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [78:15]
Carl Casada
Destroying bulldozers, driving them off cliffs, burning down ski chalets, like pretty wild stuff. Because they believed there was no retreat in defense of Mother Earth. He's a quote. But anyways, he was Tucson. Earth first birthed in Tucson. And then Earth first was a victim of the green scare. And many of them are still in prison for their work. But they did have an effect. Whether you agree with that sort of direct activism or not. They had an effect.
- [78:41]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [78:41]
Carl Casada
But here we are. It's been many years after those big main activities and all that stuff sort of became quiet. You don't really think of like direct action activism when it comes to the. To the Environment like you did back in the 80s and 90s. But when this data center popped up, groups started showing up in Tucson that really felt very Earth First. E. I'm not talking direct action like firebombs, but their speech, the way they were organizing, coming to city council meetings and not just showing up to speak, but disrupting the meetings, like causing a scene. And their work so far, and I will mention some of them later in this topic, have actually sort of forced the hand of the city council to deny the project. And so looking back, you're like, it's interesting to see the resonance of things like those old freeway activists and Edward Abbey and Earth First. It's still there. Tucson still has that. And you see that coming up now in regards to this data center project and other things that are starting to happen.
- [79:42]
James Stout
Yeah, I love Tucson. I've spent a lot of time in Tucson for years and years and years, and there is a feeling of like, it's got this like DIY community feeling that you do not experience. People think Tucson and Phoenix are just smaller version of the same, but they're incredibly different.
- [79:59]
Carl Casada
Oh, no. Yeah. It's hard to describe the difference. You have to go to both.
- [80:02]
James Stout
Yeah. Yeah. Or you could not go to Phoenix. You can go almost anywhere else in the US and experience the same thing as Phoenix. Right. It's incredibly generic as a city. Yeah.
- [80:10]
Carl Casada
You know, Phoenix is an old place, too. Not as old as Tucson, but the very core, the downtown of Phoenix still has something. However, Phoenix was never good about preserving any of its historicity or historical content. And so they never saw a building old enough or cool enough that they didn't care about bulldozing it and putting up a Walgreens. And so Phoenix is as. I forgot what documentary it was, but it was like what you just described so many American cities. You drive through it and it's just like this, like, constantly looping revolving piece of film of Walgreens, McDonald's nail salon, super cuts, Chilies, rinse and repeat.
- [80:47]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [80:48]
Carl Casada
And it just. Every 10 miles, it's the same thing. Dutch brothers, coffee. It just never ends. And Tucson is not yet like that. It still has. Still has a soul.
- [80:57]
James Stout
Yeah. There are special places in Phoenix who say, like Guadalupe is. Is cool. Where my yagi friends live. The center's a nice area. I like going there. Let's take a little break and talk about how to sign a post. This data center.
- [81:18]
Carl Casada
So there are a number of groups that came together. You can't track everything all at once because it's not possible As a human being. But the one I've been keeping an eye on and communicating with is called. Called no Desert data Center. They have a presence on the web. They're all over social media, Facebook, Instagram, and for me, at least. And this is not to exclude anyone. If. If you're one of the primary people or groups that we're working against this and you heard this, please do not feel like I'm excluding you. This is just the group that I landed up connecting with and following. So, yeah, you. But they are also doing a good job of aggregating others, too. So almost all of their posts have, like, a bunch of other groups tagged in it. So if you were to look up the no Desert Data center folks, you're going to find a lot of them. But they had some amazing artwork. You know, one of the things that I think is really important in activism is getting the attention of the local community. Artwork will do that. So, yeah, this incredible poster that's, like, says, no drop for data. And it's a water drop with a rattlesnake and a javelina and a saguaro, and they had a rattlesnake wrapped around a raindrop. That's cool. Really good stuff. That catches your eye.
- [82:20]
James Stout
Yeah, yeah.
- [82:21]
Carl Casada
So they were doing that, but they were also getting people together. They were having meetings, planning sessions before city council meetings, getting people together, doing the artwork there, rallying the troops, for lack of a better term, building morale. You don't have activism without morale. And then they were showing up and showing up in numbers. There's videos on Instagram on their feed alone where one of these city council meetings had over a thousand Tucsonians in it with signs and posters. And they weren't just sitting there quietly waiting for their 30 seconds to speak. They were disruptive. They were loud, and they were not going to not be heard. So that type of activism, in this instance, very clearly is the reason that this happened, because if you read the writings of a number of the city council members, they were very sympathetic to the data center. One of them was talking about, like, this is the wrong thing to do. If we block the data center, they're just going to build it anyway. And it's better for us to be involved because then we can help tune it to be better for the community. No, no, no, no, no. You're just whitewashing a horrible thing. And so this group and other groups called them out on that immediately.
- [83:30]
James Stout
Nice.
- [83:30]
Carl Casada
They're like, no, that's not it. So I think I'm answering your question. But it's groups like this stowing up in large numbers, being loud, not only online, but in person, that force their hand.
- [83:43]
James Stout
That's crucial. Yeah, yeah. It's people actually being willing to, like, get out the tweets and into the streets, so to speak, to actually show up, in this case, at these meetings. But it doesn't have to just be meetings. It could be anywhere. I guess we should just talk about. Tucson is from an odd time word. It means dark corner. But it is not a cool place. It is cooler than Phoenix, actually. Less hot. But, like, this data center would have consumed a massive amount of energy, I presume, like just keeping the computers cooled. Right. And a massive amount of water to do that.
- [84:13]
Carl Casada
Yeah, absolutely. So when you start talking about heat, for example, I think it's worth. I know we don't have infinite time here on this podcast, but it's worth noting for people that are not familiar with the concept of heat islands. Yeah, heat islands are where you build so much metropolitan infrastructure, including asphalt and concrete, with no thought towards heat or cooling. You really don't. Like, Phoenix was built without thinking about that. They're thinking about it now, but it wasn't built thinking about it when it sprawled and it was continuing to sprawl. Yeah, Phoenix was always a little hotter than Tucson just because of, like, you know, geographical reasons. But now Phoenix is measurably and demonstrably hotter. Yeah, because it never cools off. And that's a heat island. So what happens is during the day, all of that concrete, all that asphalt, all those things heat up and it'll get to, at moments like just this last week, 118, 120 degrees in the middle of the day. But because the heat island hasn't been architected well and has no green space to deal with this at night, it's still 105.
- [85:15]
James Stout
Jesus.
- [85:16]
Carl Casada
Yeah, it never gets below 100. And so the problem with heat, like obviously 120 degrees, can kill you, but the problem with the heat is that as you never get a chance to cool off, heat over time is more dangerous to human, to all living organisms. If you get a break, that's what keeps you alive. So it can be 120 during the day, but if it's 75 at night, that gives you a moment to heal and recuperate for the next day's heat. Yeah, Phoenix is one of a. Not the worst, believe it or not, but one of the worst versions of a heat island. And they are actively working to make that better. But it's kind of hard to undo what's been done.
- [85:55]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [85:56]
Carl Casada
Tucson, once again, because the sprawl was diminished by activism of the past, did not become the heat island Phoenix does. So while it might be 113 during the day, it might get down to 80 at night.
- [86:08]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [86:08]
Carl Casada
And that really is a big difference for not only sustainability, but for the health and safety of everyone that lives there. One of the things that I find is interesting is the justification for these data centers is because Arizona is seen as a place that doesn't have significant natural disaster risk. But one of the things that's being left out of the conversation, I don't know why this is the case, is that heat and heat islands are a natural disaster.
- [86:34]
James Stout
Yeah, yeah, yeah. They kill people.
- [86:37]
Carl Casada
If the power were to go out in Phoenix at the wrong time of year, the death toll is hard to fathom.
- [86:43]
James Stout
Yeah, yeah. People, yeah. Without air conditioning, it's unsurvivable in those temperatures, especially for older people, people medically conditioned, so what have you.
- [86:51]
Carl Casada
Anyone at risk. The unhoused is one example, of course, which they don't even do proper metrics and measuring of because our society doesn't care like it should. However, outside of that, like you said, people that are at risk, anyone that has any sort of illness, the young, the elderly, the. Anyone like that, they have to live in their air conditioned spaceship to survive.
- [87:09]
James Stout
Yeah, yeah. And it would have taken, like you say, a huge amount of cooling just to keep this data center.
- [87:16]
Carl Casada
Well, that's where this gets so fascinating when they start proposing these because like, oh wait, let's be realistic, right? Arizona is probably low risk for a dramatic earthquake or a hurricane. That's fair. However, it is not at low risk for a heat casualty event which is going on every year and getting worse with climate change. And so these data centers, the one in Tucson that was proposed, would have consumed. And the numbers fluctuate. And of course the numbers you get from the Amazon crew versus others will be a little different. But as best as I can tell, the power consumption of this one data center was essentially the equivalent of that of metropolitan Tucson.
- [87:54]
James Stout
Jesus. Yeah.
- [87:56]
Carl Casada
So you double the power load of the entire city for this data center and the cooling system, there's two different ways to cool. There's quote unquote, air cooled and water cooled. They can tell you whatever they want. The reality is they're probably not going to be affected with air cooled in this environment. So it's going to be water cooled. And the data on that also seems to be the water consumption of this was not only equal, maybe worse than that of Tucson itself. Looking at this site right now, water positivity claimed for the initial two years, but the initial estimate was 622 million gallons.
- [88:32]
Dana Schwartz
Whoa.
- [88:33]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [88:33]
Carl Casada
Yeah. With a 700 milliwatt expected demand. It's crazy. And so what happens is not only does the city council just see dollar signs in their eyes, local electrical infrastructure, like tep, the Tucson Electrical or other data center, places where data centers are located, suddenly do things like stop worrying about any form of carbon positivity, or they get rid of all their carbon goals so that they can build and work with people like this. Because if you double the power consumption of a region overnight for a data center, think of the waste that you're going to produce to do that.
- [89:11]
James Stout
Right. Yeah.
- [89:13]
Carl Casada
And suddenly, how do you produce that power? You're not going to have a nuclear plant pop up tomorrow, so you're going to do other things like burn more coal.
- [89:21]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [89:21]
Carl Casada
And so your carbon and carbon positivity are the tempt to move away from carbon waste. They just throw that out the door so they can have these lucrative, juicy contracts with these data centers.
- [89:33]
James Stout
Yeah. Yeah. That is. I mean, it just. On the face of it, when I heard of it, I was just like, why are they doing this in one of the hottest places in, you know, in. In the region? But I guess, yeah, they. They don't. Just don't see heat as a threat. Having spent a lot of time in the desert there, I can tell you it is a threat to human life. So as of last week. Right. The council has refused it permission to.
- [89:56]
Carl Casada
Be built in Tucson due to intense external pressure. Yeah, they were. They did vote against it.
- [90:03]
Andrew Sage
Yes.
- [90:04]
James Stout
Yeah. So that's like. It's a victory, I guess it's a victory in a battle, but it's not the end of the war.
- [90:09]
Carl Casada
Oh, no. That's the problem with all this is that these companies and these folks will never stop. So I just saw an article, in fact, that two days ago, yes, this project was voted down. However, they're coming back with just another proposal to do it a slightly different way. And so each time they just reiterate and change it. It's just a new battle.
- [90:30]
James Stout
Right.
- [90:31]
Carl Casada
So they will change the words however they want to make it sound until these people will vote yes for it. So, like Nikki Lee, which is the ward for councilwoman, was the one that was arguing against essentially saying that we should approve this project so we can have better control of it.
- [90:49]
James Stout
Right.
- [90:49]
Carl Casada
And the activists said against that, but it's just, they're just going to keep changing the tune until the activists get essentially worn out. On top of that, this is not the only data center being proposed in Arizona. There are currently three of them under proposal. There's this one in Tucson and two of them in Pinal County. The one in Pinal county starts off at the small size of 300 acres, but it's proposed to go to 3,000 acres.
- [91:20]
James Stout
Jesus.
- [91:21]
Carl Casada
They want to build ultimately a 3,000 acre data center that sprawls essentially from southern Phoenix across the entire north south breadth of Pinal county on the west side of the I10 southwest of Eloy, extending through significant what are indigenous or what were indigenous lands, destroying whatever cultural remains are there. But imagine if this 290 acre data center was going to equal the power consumption and water consumption of Tucson. What is a 3,000 acre data center going to do?
- [91:56]
James Stout
Yeah, yeah, that's insane. That's this vast.
- [92:00]
Carl Casada
And that one is currently still in its early phases. That one is called the Laosa project. The CEO of this company is named Kuldeep Verma. Okay, Verma. V E R M A I'm not a fact. Sure that's the right pronunciation. But in another example of tech bro narcissism, he's calling this Verma Land. And his company is called Verma Land. It's like the most awful version of Disneyland. We're not even bringing you rides. We're just going to drink your water, belch heat into the sky, destroy your desert so you can have a disturbing psychological parasocial relationship with an AI avatar and we're going to do it at your expense. Verma Land. Isn't that lovely?
- [92:37]
James Stout
Yeah. Then I've seen. That's weird. They already own a lot of land off the i10, I think.
- [92:43]
Carl Casada
Yeah, no, they've been, they've been purchasing land throughout Arizona and sitting on it. But this is where the 3,000 acres come from is Verma Land.
- [92:50]
James Stout
Jesus. Yeah, that is. That's a mind bogglingly vast data center. So I guess like this is one, you know, as you say, this will either move someone else or there will be other struggles. Right. Like the. For instance, the United States is waiving many of the waivers, including ones that protect indigenous human remains, to build its border infrastructure. Right now actually a lot of the border infrastructure is coming out of the U of A Tech park in Tucson. Right. That's where a lot of these companies have their headquarters. Right. The people who make the border surveillance infrastructure. What can we learn from this struggle in Tucson? If we're not in Tucson. We might not even be in the US because there are some unique things about Tucson. It has this history of activism and it's always been, I don't want to use weird in a derogatory way, but it hasn't conformed to the neoliberal capital model of a city. But I don't think it's unique. There are things I think that anyone can take from this victory and the continued opposition. Right. So what can we learn from it?
- [94:01]
Carl Casada
Yeah, I know. Yeah. No, I think that that's a fair way to put it. And I think that like speaking of like the reverberance of the history of the area and the types of movements that came out of there.
- [94:09]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [94:10]
Carl Casada
As we mentioned already earlier, make Tucson unique in regards to it being at least culturally more ready than some place to have this struggle. However, if they do succeed and completely stop Project Blue and the 290 acre data center near Tucson is stopped, it's not going to stop there. We see three more data centers being proposed in Arizona proper. This 3,000 acre dream site that I've mentioned already is they're just going to keep changing and moving and trying to do it somewhere else. The reality of this is that when we look back at the workers rights movement, there was the iww, the industrial workers of the world. The thing is Tucson winning one fight against this data center only is a microcosm of the greater macrocosm of the consumption of these tech bros and tech industry people who do not care about the climate, do not care about you, do not care about the community, do not care about the water they consume and they will destroy everything in their path for profit. We know that that is what this form of data capitalism is. And so Tucson's lesson is everyone has to be this. And I agree with you that Tucson isn't unique in that there are other places that will have the fight. But this is truthfully everyone's fight. Because the amount of pollution that would be belched out of this data center or the ones being proposed in Arizona affects everyone. The reality of climate change is in my opinion, indisputable. We're seeing it every year. It's worse and it is human induced, at least to a large degree, unlike some people want to deny. And having your AI avatar on the Internet is not in the interest of humanity as a whole. So we have to work on this on a much larger. It's a global issue.
- [95:59]
James Stout
Yeah, yeah.
- [96:00]
Carl Casada
It is not. It is not a local issue. That's what I'M trying to say. And these data companies like Amazon, like Google, like Apple, although this isn't Apple in this instance, but all of them, they have the power, if not more of power than that of a nation state.
- [96:14]
James Stout
Oh yeah. Like I think of my friends in the Marshall Islands, right? The small nation state, but one nonetheless. Right. They will have maybe 30 or 40 years before the islands are uninhabitable due to the rise of the sea level. And like their response has been a. To double down on community and supporting each other. Right. They also did things like if you go in between the islands on atoll in the Marshall Islands, generally you use like a Higgins boat, a landing craft from World War II. Right. But they also have these solar powered canoes now to, to reduce their footprint. They are a tiny, tiny fraction of a single percent of the world's CO2 footprint. And so what happens in Tucson will affect them.
- [96:53]
Podcast Announcer
Right.
- [96:53]
James Stout
And what they do cannot alone help them survive. Right. And they've appealed to the world. Solidarity. I made a whole podcast about this and the world has not shown up for them. Right. So like, I think people, you're right, this is a global struggle. It's one that it doesn't stop in Tucson, doesn't stop in Eloy, doesn't stop in Phoenix. It stops when these data centers, which are antithetical to our survival of a species, stop being built for shit that we don't need.
- [97:21]
Carl Casada
This is touching on a point that always, that frustrates me frequently when we talk to people who are at least on the right side minded in terms of being concerned about our future. And they do the thing, they'll do their recycling or they'll put up a solar panel, all those things. Sure. Yeah, but and this isn't to say that the individual shouldn't do the ethical and moral thing that they can do when they can do it. Absolutely. Can you recycle? Sure. Do it. Can you put up a solar panel? Absolutely. Do that. But the real truth and reality of climate change and the destruction of our environment and this planet that we all inhabit, it's not the individual, it's these corporations. It is at a nation state level and a corporate level that is going to destroy our small Biosphere one. Ironically, biosphere is. The experiment is near Tucson, actually.
- [98:09]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [98:09]
Carl Casada
Biosphere 2 was a little experiment that was a self contained 1980s thing where these scientists essentially encapsulated themselves in airtight bubbles to see if they could live with the CO2 production that they were creating within it. The truth was they couldn't the ocean turned to algae and they would have died. So they learned Biosphere 2 wasn't going to work. But we have Biosphere 1 and the individual doing the solar panels or recycling. That's a good thing and that's moral. But that's great. It's, that's something we should do if we can. But it's us. We have to act against the truly destructive forces and it's the corporations and the nation states that are belching destruction into our planet, not the individual. Recycling or not recycling a soda can.
- [98:50]
James Stout
Yeah, exactly. And I think it's one of the greatest, like frauds or, I don't know, canards that these corporations have managed to pull off. It's to have people attribute blame for climate change to the person not recycling their can, not the corporation. Yeah.
- [99:06]
Carl Casada
You know, the political spectrum is always challenging and I'm not trying to like point at any one thing, but this is where I think we all have our failings.
- [99:14]
Andrew Sage
Right.
- [99:14]
Carl Casada
And I think this is where like progressive space fails often, which is you'll see tone policing and you'll see recycling and you'll see solar panels. But the reality is that isn't really doing shit. It just isn't in the grand scheme of the numbers. It isn't it? That data center. Stopping that data center is an actual victory. That's something that needs to happen.
- [99:34]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [99:34]
Carl Casada
And those things need to stop. That kind of stuff across the board, not just in Tucson, not just in Arizona, but everywhere needs to be a thing where everyone comes together and realizes that these people are consuming the very planet that we need to live on. You see Elon Musk talking about going to Mars. The human race has to go to Mars because a meteor might hit the Earth. No, your company is what hit the Earth, my friend. You're the one destroying the Earth, not that meteor.
- [100:05]
James Stout
Yeah, yeah. It's not external. It's coming from within.
- [100:09]
Carl Casada
Right.
- [100:10]
James Stout
And it is, as you say, like it's a species level threat to us.
- [100:14]
Carl Casada
The call is literally coming from inside the house.
- [100:16]
James Stout
Yeah. But we should also celebrate these victories and learn from them. Right. So if people are interested in learning more about the struggle in Tucson, perhaps they're living in Phoenix and they're just now learning about Verma Land or these other AI projects. Like, like where can they find out more about this? How can they involve themselves?
- [100:36]
Podcast Announcer
Yeah.
- [100:37]
Carl Casada
So I want to, first of all, I hope that I didn't come across as saying like, this is hopeless. I don't think it is. Like when we see the actions of, like, what made Tucson unique now. And we saw the actions of what Earth first was able to achieve through their decades of work, which they did achieve a lot. It resonates still to this day. The planet is a better place because those people paid a price to do what they did. And that's just something that never stops is what it boils down to. These companies, these people will never stop trying to destroy our home for their profit. So that's the point I was trying to make. And so this was a success, and we should celebrate that. Like you said, the one I want to reference is no. Desertdatacenter.com Again, I want to very much point out they are not the only ones. Many people came together. They're the one I have really been paying attention to. If you go to nodesertdatacenter.com they have links to all their socials, Instagram, Blue Sky, Facebook. And if you go to any of those, their Instagram's particularly active and has some great motivational art on it. I will tell you that they will also link you to a number of other organizations at the same time. Yeah. So if you're interested in this particular issue of these data centers in Arizona, I would reference you to that. You can go to their link tree, which is also linked from their Instagram, and that'll connect you to a number of other organizations that are working on this right now and to their merit. The Project Blue, they succeeded, at least delaying Project Blue, hopefully stopping it.
- [102:02]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [102:03]
Carl Casada
And the next post they put up was about the data center in Eloy. So they understand that this is broader in scope than just one desert data center. That's good.
- [102:11]
James Stout
Yeah.
- [102:12]
Carl Casada
It's like it was in the movie There Will Be Blood. If you ever saw that. There's an amazing line, of course I drink your milkshake if you drink the water south of Tucson, or don't, but then put a data center just north of Tucson. It doesn't matter. It's the same watershed. Yeah, yeah, right.
- [102:27]
James Stout
It's the same.
- [102:28]
Carl Casada
Same problem. So no desertdatacenter.com and that'll get you to a bunch of different links and a bunch of updates about what's going on with this.
- [102:36]
James Stout
Perfect. And Carl, if people want to follow your work, I mean, you have a presence on the Internet. Where can people find you?
- [102:42]
Carl Casada
Yeah, yeah, yeah. My project is not necessarily about the desert data center, but I'm definitely, obviously very sympathetic and part of that, too, just not on my project. I'm in Range tv. So if you want to find all my work, you can find it by just easily going inrange TV and there's a link on there called watch and that'll get you to all my socials. I distribute my video content decentralized. YouTube is the. Is the line in the room. Let's be realistic. But I have my content in multiple different places. Easiest way to find all of them is InRange TV. And you'll find my socials there too, which is Facebook and Blue sky and all that. And of course, my topic is more about firearms history and civil rights and how they intersect. But if our ability to breathe and drink water isn't human rights, I don't know what is.
- [103:25]
James Stout
Yeah, yeah. I think that's how we should see these things. Thank you so much for your time, Kyle.
- [103:28]
Dana Schwartz
That was great.
- [103:29]
Carl Casada
James, thank you for having me. I appreciate it's always a real treat to be on any of the shows here. And I love all the work you all are doing. And together, hopefully we can. I don't know how to put it. Stop these corporate maggots from eating our not yet corpse of an earth.
- [103:42]
James Stout
Yeah, man. I think it's like, I guess I'll finish up by saying, like, it doesn't matter if we're confronting fascism. It doesn't matter if we're confronting this destruction of our planet. Right. The only way through this is together and the only way that we defeat this is through building stronger communities to show up for one another. And that's something that you have documented extensively in the historical parts of your channel. So I think there is a connection that I hope people can see there.
- [104:07]
Carl Casada
Yeah. Community defense is also protecting our planet so we can live on it. Yeah, I agree with that. And we have to do that together. Thousands of people showing up to city council meeting at Tucson is a glimmer of light in this moment and hopefully we can see more of them.
- [104:21]
James Stout
Yeah. All right, thanks, K.
- [104:36]
Podcast Announcer
The reviews and ratings are in and Ice Cube's Big Three is the surprise hit of the summer. And to capture off the season, iHeart.
- [104:43]
James Stout
Presents the Big Three Basketball Championship and 8th Annual Big Three All Star Game this coming Sunday, August 24th.
- [104:50]
Podcast Announcer
Live from Orlando, the remaining two teams fight it out for the Big Three Championship. Dr. J Trophy in the most physical, fierce and competitive basketball league in the world.
- [105:00]
James Stout
Don't miss the wild conclusion of Big.
- [105:01]
Podcast Announcer
Three's eighth and most historic season ever. This is the game no one wants to lose. And there's no crying in the big Big Three. The action starts with the Big Three.
- [105:10]
James Stout
Eighth Annual All Star Game.
- [105:11]
Podcast Announcer
Don't miss All Stars Dwight Howard, Montrez.
- [105:14]
James Stout
Harrell, MVP Michael Beasley, Lance will make you Dan Stevenson, Jordan Crawford, Greg Monroe.
- [105:20]
Podcast Announcer
Earl Clark, Nazir Kor and more show.
- [105:22]
Andrew Sage
You why they are the best three.
- [105:24]
Podcast Announcer
On three basketball players in the world. Big three's exciting all star game plus the crowning of a new big three champion. The no holds part action starts Sunday at 2pm Eastern, 11 Pacific only on CBS. Have you ever looked at a piece of abstract art or music or poetry and thought that's just a bunch of pretentious nonsense?
- [105:43]
James Stout
Well, that's exactly what two bored Australian.
- [105:45]
Podcast Announcer
Soldiers set out to prove during World War II when they pulled off what.
- [105:49]
James Stout
Was either a bold literary hoax or.
- [105:51]
Podcast Announcer
A grand poetic experiment, publishing over a dozen intentionally bad but highly acclaimed works of expressionist poetry under the name Ern Malley. In an incident that caused a media firestorm and even a criminal trial, the Ern Malley episode made fools of believers and critics alike and still fascinates poetry lovers to this day. We break down the truth, the lies and the poetry in between on Hoax, a new podcast hosted by me, Lizzie Logan and me, Dana Schwartz.
- [106:19]
Dana Schwartz
Every episode, Hoax explores an audacious fraud.
- [106:22]
Podcast Announcer
Or ruse from history, from forged artwork to the original fake news. To try and answer why we believe, listen to hoax on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [106:35]
Dana Schwartz
Hey guys, it's AZ Fudd. You may know me as a gold medalist. You may know me as an NCAA National Champion and recent Most Outstanding player. You may even know me as the People's Princess. But now you're also gonna know me as your favorite host. Every week on my new podcast, Butt around and Find Out.
- [106:53]
Podcast Announcer
I'll give you an inside look at.
- [106:54]
Dana Schwartz
Everything happening in my crazy life as.
- [106:56]
Podcast Announcer
I try to balance it all, from.
- [106:58]
Dana Schwartz
My travels across the globe to preparing for another run at the natty with my UConn Huskies, to just trying to make it to my midterms on time. You'll get the inside scoop on everything.
- [107:06]
Podcast Announcer
I'll be talking to some special guests.
- [107:08]
Dana Schwartz
About pop culture basketball and what it's.
- [107:10]
Podcast Announcer
Like to be a professional athlete on and off the court. You'll even get to have some fun with the Fudd family.
- [107:16]
Dana Schwartz
So if you follow me on social media or watch me on tv, you.
- [107:19]
Podcast Announcer
May think you know me, but this.
- [107:21]
Dana Schwartz
Show is the only place where you can really fud around and find out. Listen to Fut around and Find Out, a production of iHeart Women's Sports in partnership with Unanimous Media on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [107:36]
Podcast Announcer
When I became a journalist, I was the first Latina in the newsrooms where I worked.
- [107:40]
James Stout
I'm Maria Hinojosa.
- [107:42]
Dana Schwartz
I dreamt of having a place where.
- [107:43]
Podcast Announcer
Voices that have been been historically sidelined would instead be centered. For over 30 years now, Latino USA has been that place. This is Latino USA, the radio journal of news and Cultula. As the longest running Latino news and culture show in the United States, Latino USA delivers the stories that truly matter to all of us. From sharp and deep analysis of the most pressing news, they're creating this narrative.
- [108:10]
Carl Casada
That immigrants are criminals.
- [108:12]
James Stout
This is about everyone's freedom of speech. Nobody expected two popes from the American.
- [108:18]
Podcast Announcer
Continent to stories about our cultures and our identities.
- [108:22]
Carl Casada
When you do get a trans character like Emilia Perez, the trans community is.
- [108:25]
Dana Schwartz
Going to push back on that colorism. All of these things that exist in Mexican culture and Latino culture, you'll hear.
- [108:32]
Podcast Announcer
From people like Congresswoman aoc. I don't want to give them my fear. I'm not going to give them my fear.
- [108:37]
Dana Schwartz
Listen to Latino USA as part of.
- [108:39]
Podcast Announcer
The Mic Cultura Podcast Network, available on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to It Could Happen Here, a podcast about things falling apart this week featuring an entire three sentences about putting it back together again. I am your host, Beo Wong, and today we are gathered here to talk talk about tariffs. Oh, boy. It has been a massive two weeks of tariff news, the most important aspect of which has been finally getting a resolution to what was going on with the Liberation Day turf tariffs that Trump tried to impose at the beginning of his time in office. On July 31, we finally actually found out what those tariffs were going to look like. And what those tariffs are going to look like is, per CNN, effectively, what happened is that roughly, if the US runs a trade deficit with you, you get a 15% tariff and you get a 10% tariff. If we run a trade surplus with you now, there's a bunch of other individual rates. We'll get to some of them in a second. But it's worth emphasizing that this doesn't make any sense. So, okay, before we get into the structural effects of this, I want to sort of look at what the nominal stated justification for imposing these tariffs are and how they're at odds with each other. And this is a point we'll return to later. Part of the justification for the tariffs is that, okay, they're trying to use tariffs to replace the income tax. That's nonsense. It's gibberish. You literally cannot raise enough money through tariffs to replace the income tax. But, but okay, that's the thing that they want to do. The other nominal justification, and this is what's being used in negotiations and is the thing that is causing individual tariff rates to randomly sort of be jacked up, is that Trump is pissed off that the US runs trade deficits with countries. And again, like this is basically nonsense. The US pays for things in its own currency. We don't actually need other places currency. It doesn't matter if we run trade deficits. I really hate that Rand Paul is right when he said I run a trade deficit with my grocery store. But like, that's how the American empire is supposed to work. These people do not care that this is how the American empire is supposed to work. They have been handed the most sophisticated imperial machinery that has ever existed in the entirety of human history. And they see numbers on a chart which says we pay them more money than we're getting and they're pissed about it. But again, okay, if that's a state of justification, right, then why are you imposing a tariff on countries we have a trade surplus to? That doesn't make any sense. And the difference between them is only 5%. So what are we doing here? It's nonsense. Like our trade policy is being run by people who don't understand how any of this works and are operating off of, you know, effectively just pure anger and rage. So I'm going to talk about a few of the really, really high rates. We're not going to focus that much on the 30%. South Africa for example, but oh boy. So Syria is at 41%, which is absolutely fucking hideous. Syria is a country that I don't know. Anyone who listens to this show is aware of the extent to which Syria has been devastated by the civil war. And this is an incredible blow to their economy. Laos and Myanmar are also being tariffed at 40%. And we promised in the executive disorder to explain how Trump recognizing the junta. So Joe Biden had refused to recognize Myanmar's like military coup government. As longtime listeners of this show are aware, there was a military coup in, in Myanmar. There was a large scale revolutionary process attempting to overthrow this government. My co host James Stout and Robert Evans have done a lot of very good reporting on this that you can go find. You should find it. It's some of the best journalism that I've ever encountered. But the US's official position has been that we don't recognize the coup government because it is, and this is true, a coup government. But Trump just sent the junta a letter that says you're tariffed at 40%. And the thing about this is the junta was like, oh, shit. Hell, yeah. Like, that mean. That means you recognize us, right? Because you're sending us official fucking notices of shit. So you're recognizing us as the legitimate government of Myanmar. And so the JITA is, like, thrilled by this. There's some evidence of, like, the US Lifting sanctions on them after. It's kind of messy, but, yeah, great. Somehow in the attempt to sort of just like, squeeze every last drop out of all of these countries, we have recognized an incredibly brutal military dictatorship. Ship. Hate that. Hate that. Back to the more direct tariff stuff. The tariffs on Laos is also going to be devastating for Laotian economy, which is a lot of the economies in Southeast Asia are pretty heavily export driven, and it's one of the places where a lot of textiles manufacturing takes place. After the sort of increase in labor prices and increase in resistance from the labor movement in China kind of pushed all of that capital down the Mekong River Delta. This is gonna absolutely fucking suck for everyone in Laos. And, you know, this is something I want to keep emphasizing over and over again that these turf tariffs, the people they hurt the most are workers in places like Laos, in places like Syria, right. Who are going to just be absolutely fucking devastated by it. Now, let's also talk Switzerland, which was the other country that had a tariff at, like, 40%. This one is genuinely really funny, which is that it seems to largely be driven by Trump being pissed off at the trade deficit, which is, like. Compared to, like, the scale of the US economy, the trade deficit is like, $0. But the funniest part of this is that the trade deficit is largely driven by gold imports. Now, this is extremely funny because if you know anything about the American, right, you know that a lot of the ways that they did their funding, especially when they were sort of building their operations, a huge source of their funding is getting their followers to buy gold. This was the original Alex Jones grift, right? I think he still does it a little bit now. Before he sort of pivoted in supplements, he would partner with, like, gold salesmen and, like, silver salesmen. This, and this has always been a huge source of these people's money. Now there's. There's been a little bit of decrease in the. In the prominence of gold as a thing. There's actually. There's a. There's A very good folding ideas video about this incredibly bizarre Idris Elba weird gold promotion documentary which talks about the ways in which gold has been sort of threatened by bitcoin and well, mostly bitcoin, but it's like cryptocurrency in general as like the scam you're trying to sell all of these sort of weird prepper and like hardline quote unquote sound money libertarian Y types. But it is very funny that this is in effect a self reinforcing cycle because the thing about the price of gold is that it is largely determined by how fucked the rest of the economy is.
- [115:59]
Dana Schwartz
Gold.
- [116:00]
Podcast Announcer
People who are trying to sell gold are trying to sell you on the fact that the economy is about to fucking explode. But this is a cyclical effect, right, where these tariff rates go up and the economy explodes and so people buy more gold from Switzerland, at which point our trade balance with Switzerland gets worse and worse and worse. So any other like Swiss watches are another sort of major source of export currency stuff which are again all worn by all these fucking MAGA grifters with their like fucking $10,000 watches or whatever. So that one is just funny. Trump has also announced and this has not gone into effect yet. Who fucking knows when if it goes into effect. But I think it's worth talking about, which is that Trump has been talking about putting a 100% tariff on semiconductors unless you invest in the U.S. so Apple sort of in response to this pledged $100 million in investment in the U.S. to build chips. And I think it's also worth looking at the ide underpinnings of this because a huge part of this thing is something that you've been seeing increasingly on the right is this dream of making domestic iPhones. And if you look at the people in the tech sector, right, the sort of tech billionaires who run all this stuff, they're openly fantasizing about like, oh, these like soft, weak liberals are going to be forced to like work in the factories and put iPhones together or whatever. And it's worth emphasizing that this is just not possible, right? And this is true of a significant number of the things that they want these tariffs to do. They're just not possible results of the policy levers they're pulling. A couple of months ago I described a sort of similar policy thing to this as like they are attempting to scream at the moon in order to control the tides. And it's like it doesn't work. It's not the right lever. It literally can't do what you think it's going to do. And it's worth going into why, which is that. But we can't make iPhones here because we don't have the migrant labor force to do it. And a lot of you may be thinking, oh well, the US has a lot of migrant workers. No, you don't understand China, which is where most of these things are built. Even with the tariffs, like a lot of, you know, there were some downcycling of plants. That stuff has mostly been upcycled. Again, China has 300 million migrant workers. That is almost the entire population of the United States.
- [118:15]
Dana Schwartz
Right.
- [118:16]
Podcast Announcer
We are talking about individual plants with 200,000 workers. That is the low end estimate, by the way, of those numbers. We don't actually have very good numbers on how big some of these Foxconn facilities are. The low end estimate is 200,000. Right. And again, this is just in time production. So okay, what does it actually mean? Right. This means that the production cycles work a lot of, for example, the way that UPS works, right. We're like, like you have a bunch of people who are effectively seasonal or part time workers who only come in when demand increases. So for ups, right. And it's actually a relatively similar schedule to the way it works in China. But it's like there's these massive surges around the holidays. With Apple, it's, it's more like September, November, roughly. But it's, it's, it's in order to like massively be able to ramp up production in time for, you know, the sort of like massive holiday increase of orders. Right. But in order to do this, you need to have a production apparatus where you have 200,000 workers there, but you can also get rid of most of them and they can support themselves doing other stuff for the rest of the year and then you have to be able to bring them back in during peak season. We just do not have the populations to replicate this. Right. Even if you're trying to replace it with prison labor. The thing about the American prison system is that it's decentralized. Right. This is actually a key element of how the US economy is structured. Prisons are one of the sort of three major sources of jobs in rural areas. The other two are like Walmart style service jobs which replace anything else that was in the economy and then military bases, which is part of why, you know, like, like this is part of why rural politics have gone so reactionary. Because like, okay, so if you're, if your options in the economy are soldier, prison, guard service, labor, you're going to generate a bunch of unhinged reactionary bullshit. But again, even though the American prison system has a really high population, these people are really spread out. And iPhone production requires sort of like mass centralization, right? That's the only way to get these things to work. Plus, the workers that you're bringing in have to be skilled enough to be able to do this shit. And this is a capacity that's been built up in China over the course of like, decades, right? And we don't really have this now. People have tried moving this production to other places, like Vietnam, for example. The tariff rates there are also making this extremely difficult, but it's been really, really hard to replace. And the other issue, and this is a technological issue, not just a sort of issue of the systemic elements of the population of China. The infrastructure to build microchips in the US and it's not just that the infrastructure to build the chips doesn't exist. It's actually way worse than that. And this is why all of the attempts and the Biden administration has put an enormous amount of money into this. The Chinese government also has put an enormous amount of money specifically into the microchip angle, and none of them have been able to do it. And part of it's a technological problem, but part of it is that the machines that you need to make the chips don't exist, right? But the machines you need to make, the machines that make the chips also don't exist. And the machines you need to make, the machines that make. The machines that make the chips also don't exist. We are so far up the supply chain, right? And this is one of the, you know, one of the things, the thing that they're trying to do through sort of like pure politics, right? Through like, just like the pure exertion of state power, is to reshape the fundamental structural way that the supply chain has worked. And the way the supply chain has worked is by intense specialization in very, very, very small areas, right? So Taiwan, for example, becomes the only place basically that can manufacture these chips. And that intense specification means that, like, the machines that make. The machines that are used to build this thing are only made by like one company in Switzerland. And like machines that make those machines, like, who the fuck knows where they're built? And this is a thing where the technology involved has become so complicated and the labor has become so specialized that you're dealing with machines that, like, just straight up, not many people in the world know how to use. And how many people in the world know how to create. And so we're so far up the supply chain, right? And this is also, if you want to look at, like, what the impact of these tariffs are going to be, right, because these supply chains are so specialized. You know, you can think of these supply chains as like incredibly complicated machines, right? And any sort of like little rock that you throw into the machine or, you know, you throw sand into the machine and suddenly the ball bearing doesn't work at quite the right efficiency. And so and things just start breaking down across the entire supply chain. And they think that they can just replicate all of this with just like pure tariffs and like throwing money at it and. No, you can't. These are, these are actual structural things of how the economy works. Now. Do you know what else is a structural element of how the economy works? It is these products and services and the fact that they fund this podcast. Woo Foreign. We are so back. Now. One of the other kind of tariffs, the thing that I've been calling, I guess, like defiance tariffs, one of the things the Trump administration has been doing is threatening to impose a 50% tariff on anyone who buys oil from Russia. India has been threatened with this. India's current tariff rate is 25%. They're right now threatening with another 25% to get them to 50%. But it's sort of unclear exactly who's going to back down here. More interestingly, and we've talked a little bit about this, Brazil, There is a 50% turf tariff on Brazil again for refusing to release Bolsonaro, which is very funny because this has managed to piss off the entire sort of political sphere in Brazil to the extent that, like Bolsonaro has had to come out and denounce this because Bolsonaro was getting fucking torn to shreds by the Brazilian right for being basically a traitor sort of lap dog of the US as they're sort of, you know, imposing this direct attack on Brazil through this 50% tariff, right? It's backfired so spectacularly that like Lula, who was floundering, is now riding this incredible wave of sort of anti American Brazilian nationalism from both the left and the right. So Lula, who is, who is again in a pretty strong political position because of this, has refused to do direct talks with the US because he was like, absolutely not. Fuck this. Here's a quote from Reuters. We had already pardoned the US intervention in the 1964 coup, said Lula, who got his political start as a union leader protesting against the military government. That followed a US backed ouster of a democratically elected president. But this is now not a small intervention. It's the President of the United States thinking he can dictate rules for a sovereign country like Brazil. It's unacceptable. Now again, as I said in the Ed, there's a lot of things that are worth looking at here, right? We have on the one hand this direct connection from Lula, from, you know, the sort of subtle CIA backing of military coup stuff which happens under the table to, you know, this just like the President of the United States is telling you how to run your country. And that is a substantive shift even if like the CIA overthrowing your government, like, has more of a direct political impact on it. Right. The thing about, the thing about the way American power worked was that it was mostly supposed to be under the table and it's not now. It is just, it's just, it's just out there in the open. Right, right. The premise that the US governments, like the President of the United States should just be able to tell another country what to do is the fucking premise of American imperialism. And now they're just saying it out loud. And it's also worth noting that it's not like Lula is some kind of like anti American radical right. Like Lula worked really well during his first term in office with George W. Bush, but again, because of the way that the political winds have shifted here, right? To the extent that like Bolsonaro has had to condemn an attempt to get him released from prison, which is so funny because he's doing this. He is, he is, he is pushing very hard. Now, there hasn't really been a response yet for Lula's like, call for organized tariff resistance from China and India and brics. I don't know if there's going to be. It's worth talking a little bit about what BRICS actually is here. So BRICS stands for Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa. It was originally like an asset class designed by some guys at Goldman Sachs who were, you know, trying to like classify the assets of this kind of like developing economy thing. It was like, you know, you can buy bonds and these things and maybe you can classify their asset rates together and has kind of become a political alliance. But you know, there's a lot of people who will attempt to sell you on bricks being this sort of like leftist anti imperial alliance, you know, and as a sort of socialist thing. And like, like I will simply ask, right, who is doing the socialism here? Right? Is it the Butcher of Gujarat? Is it xi? Quote we must oppose welfarism. Jim Ping, is it Vladimir? We will show Ukraine true decommunization. Putin, is it the African National Congress of selling your country to bank of America? Is it the Butcher of Haiti? Like, what, what are we doing here? Right? Like, this is not actually a substantively anti American political alliance. India is a close American ally. South Africa is a close American ally. None of this really makes any sense. It's not a substantive political alliance, really. People periodically make noise about it, trying to be a substantive political alliance. But like, I mean, like India and China are periodically like at war or like almost at war with each other over the border, right? These are a bunch of countries that absolutely fucking hate each other. It's never been a coherent political project. Lula is trying to turn it into one, but like, I fuck it, I don't think that's going to work. So, you know, that's sort of what's been going on on the front of sort of national resistance. But Lula does have, you know, a kind of very, very large and powerful political force behind him domestically to resist this. We'll see what happens going forward. It's also worth noting that China has been negotiating with the US and their tariff increases, which are supposed to go into effect have been delayed for another 90 days. So we're stuck in this holding pattern again. But let's talk about what this means for the economy, right? And I think the very short term answer is that I don't think anyone really knows, right? Like the actual macro effects of this are things that we've only just started to see. No one's ever really tried to model this out because there's no reason why it would ever happen, you know, and you're starting to see things behind the scenes like medical supplies being incredibly difficult to acquire. You're starting to see a bunch of very, very weird items. And supply chains become increasingly difficult to find. But again, the supply chains are going to break down in ways that we just don't really understand what is going to happen. And what has started to happen is inflation is increasing. I want to sort of again review our kind of inflation theory, right, which is largely derived from our friends at Strange Matter sort of supply chain theory of inflation. Their thesis of inflation is that that it's not set by just supply and demand. It's set by cost plus markup, because price is not set by an autonomous thing called the market. Price is set by a guy with a price gun. It's directly set by people. And the way that those people Set the price is the cost of acquiring the item plus a markup for their profit. Now one of their fundamental like insights here is that price is sort of sticky until it isn't right? Which is that like, okay, so the actual thing that controls price is sort of like how pissed off consumers get at price increases, but also comma, that is also very, very much tied to brand, right? And if you raise your prices and consumers get pissed at you, even if you drop them again, that doesn't necessarily mean those people will come back. Right? Right. So a lot of times when there's price increases, companies try to eat it. And that's been what's happening with a lot of these things, right, where at each point in the supply chain, people are having to sort of pay for the tariff parts, right? And when someone has to pay for the tariff, they increase their prices, that they sell it to the next person in the supply chain. The next person in the supply chain increases their prices right? Now so the way that these tariffs play out, right, is that each person in the supply chain is doing cost plus markup, but their costs are going to up. So your options are either you sell it at the same price and you reduce the amount of markup you're getting, which is just reducing the raw profit you're taking in, or you raise your prices. And these things are trying to not raise their prices. And part of this is from direct political pressure, right? Like Trump has been threatening companies to not raise their prices from the tariffs. But comma, prices are starting to increase. And as this goes on and as more and more tariffs come into effect and it becomes more and more difficult to evade the tariffs, the prices are going to keep increasing because they're driven by these supply chain price increases. So, you know, cost is going to go up, it is going to have absolutely devastating impacts on workers across the world. Primarily not in the US but the workers who are in these export oriented economies are going to have to deal with just the absolute horror of large scale economic collapse. You know what, who else hopefully doesn't have to deal with the absolute horror of large scale economic collapse? It is the products and services that support this podcast. We are back. Now, the thing I want to close this episode on is not actually a look at the economy because I think, you know, we kind of don't know exactly what's going to happen in with the economy other than bad. But there is something that I think we can look at that's been broadly ignored or miscovered, which is what these tariffs say about the nature of the state. And I think what's happening is that we're seeing a fundamental change in the way that the state functions from the previous sort of neoliberal regime to this, like, just really openly fascist one. And I think the most clear example of this isn't necessarily the tariffs, as they are a pretty clear example. It's this extremely weird, like, extortion agreement reached between Trump, AMD and Nvidia. Gonna read this from CBS. Quote, US chip makers Nvidia and AMD will pay the US government 15% of revenue generated by sales of their AI chips in China. A White House official confirmed to CBS News. This is just a shakedown, right?
- [133:01]
James Stout
Right.
- [133:02]
Podcast Announcer
You know, this is part of a negotiating process by which originally AMD and Nvidia were going to be banned from selling their AI chips to China. And in order to be allowed to sell these chips to China, Trump was like, okay, if you want to do that, give us like 30% of your revenue. And they were like, okay, what if we did 15%? Right? This is just a shakedown. And, you know, it's been described as such all over the press, but they're missing something fundamental here, which is that the state fundamentally is just a shakedown, right? The analysis of Trumpism from the sort of critical press has been to view it as corruption, and it is absolutely corrupt, right? Like, no question about this, it is unbelievably corrupt. Like, we have people just giving the president blocks of fucking gold with an iPhone embedded into them, right? It's. It's hideous open corruption. But analysis that looks at the Trump administration as corruption of an ideal type, right? That looks at it as the transformation of the state into something that it fundamentally isn't. That kind of analysis is just wrong. The state has always and has always only been the localized monopoly on the legitimate use of force, right? That's all it is. That's all it's ever been. Everything we know about the state today, right, from the legal system to education to roads to environmental regulation to the welfare state, state are all just functions that were tacked on to the core monopoly on violence, either as part of a carrot and stick gambit to maintain control of population, or simply as a concession to popular force. You can just have a state that is a bunch of guys with guns who rule purely by fiat and have control over an area that is a state. Everything else that we think of as being part of a state is tacked on. And Trumpism as a political force has simply reverted the state back to a Pure mode of extraction, right? The state is men with guns who take shit from you to pay for those guns. And it becomes breathtakingly clear that this is, you know, how the state is functioning, treating the Trump administration. Because the Trump administration has been slashing benefits while handing tax breaks and giant government contracts worth billions of dollars to the tech elite, and they've been spending tens of billions of dollars, you know, to hand to the men's with guns and to recruit new men with guns for the mass deportation regime, right? This is just a pure version of the state as an extraction regime, as a regime that fucking takes money from you at gunpoint to buy more men with guns so it can take more money from you. Trumpism imagines that you can collect this money to pay for the apparatus of violence and terror from just pure extortion of foreigners in the working class. You know, and we talked about this a bit at the beginning, right? This is part of why they want to do tariffs, is they think you can replace the income tax tax. You know, the income tax is just like absolutely despised by the extra state elements of the ruling class because rich people hate paying taxes. But there just isn't enough capital to run a state like that without employing some kind of like MMTS money printing, which has alienated a huge part of Trump's austerity coalition because his like, quote unquote deficit reduction stuff hasn't actually reduced the deficit. So the people who like really, really care about that shit ideologically are pissed. But also on a fundamental level, this is already how most city governments operate, right? They are enormous police budgets extracted at gunpoint either from the city council directly or directly from the working class, from fees and fines and tickets, like just leveled at working class people directly. And this is something that is a little different from how previous regimes of neoliberalism has functioned, because those previous regimes of neoliberalism did a lot of these same things, but they were run through regimes of debt extraction, right? It was, you know, it was the imf, right, coming into your country and being like, okay, if you want to pay back these loans that this dictator took out, right, you're going to have to like sell your entire fucking working class into peonage so that your entire economy is going to be reoriented towards paying this debt back. But again, that was debt extraction based and finance based. Trumpism wants to take out the middleman and just straight up say, give me all your money if you want to live. But this is not a particularly smart strategy. There's a reason that the state takes on other guises than just a man with a gun asking for your wallet, right? A more literal regime, a more direct regime, a regime where the violence is out in the open, invites more literal resistance than a sort of symbolic regime or a regime that operates the moral principles. All regimes of accumulation, of dispossession, of resources taken by violence to produce more violence come to an end brick by brick and stone by stone. Trumpism too, will be torn to the ground by the hands of the people who it thought it could exploit forever. This has been nicadape here. The reviews and ratings are in and Ice Cube's Big Three is the surprise hit of the summer. And to cap off the season, iHeart.
- [138:13]
James Stout
Presents the Big 3 Basketball Championship and.
- [138:16]
Podcast Announcer
8Th Annual Big 3 All Star Game.
- [138:18]
James Stout
This coming Sunday, August 24th.
- [138:20]
Podcast Announcer
Live from Orlando, the remaining two teams fight it out for the Big 3.
- [138:24]
James Stout
Championship Dr. Jake Trophy in the most.
- [138:26]
Podcast Announcer
Physical, fierce and competitive basketball league in the world.
- [138:30]
James Stout
Don't miss the wild conclusion of Big.
- [138:31]
Podcast Announcer
Three's eighth and most historic season ever. This is the game no one wants to lose and there's no crying in the Big Three. The action starts with the Big Three.
- [138:40]
James Stout
Eighth Annual All Star Game.
- [138:42]
Podcast Announcer
Don't miss All Stars Dwight Howard, Montrez Harrell, MVP Michael Beasley, Lance will make.
- [138:47]
James Stout
You Dan Stephenson, Jordan Crawford, Greg Monroe.
- [138:50]
Podcast Announcer
Earl Clark, Nazir Kor and more show you why they are the best three on three basketball players in the world.
- [138:57]
Dana Schwartz
Big Three's exciting all star game plus.
- [138:59]
Podcast Announcer
The crowning of a new Big Three champion. The no holds part action starts Sunday at 2pm Eastern, 11 Pacific only on CBS.
- [139:07]
Dana Schwartz
In 1920, a magazine article announced something incredible.
- [139:12]
Podcast Announcer
Two young girls had photographed real fairies.
- [139:16]
James Stout
But even more extraordinary than the magazine.
- [139:18]
Podcast Announcer
Article'S claim was the identity of the man who wrote the article. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. The man who wrote Sherlock Holmes? Yes, the man who invented literature's most brilliant detective was fooled by two girls into thinking fairies were real. How did they do it? And why does it seem like so many smart people keep falling for outlandish tricks? These are the questions we explore in Hoax, a new podcast from me, Dana Schwartz, the host of Noble Blood, and me, Lizzy Logan. Every episode, we'll explore one of the most audacious and ambitious tricks in history, from the fake Shakespeares to balloon boys, and try to answer the question of why we believe what we believe. Listen to hoax on the iHeartradioet Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [140:13]
Dana Schwartz
Hey guys, it's Az Fudd. You may know me as a gold medalist. You may know me as an NCAA national champion and recent most outstanding player. You may even know me as a people's princess. But now you're also gonna know me as your favorite host. Every week on my new podcast, Fut around and Find Out, I'll give you.
- [140:31]
Podcast Announcer
An inside look at everything happening in.
- [140:33]
Dana Schwartz
My crazy life as I try to balance it all, from my travels across the globe to preparing for another run at the natty with my UConn Huskies, to just trying to make it to my midterms on time. You'll get the inside scoop on everything.
- [140:44]
Podcast Announcer
I'll be talking to some special guests.
- [140:45]
Dana Schwartz
About pop culture basketball and what it's like to be a professional athlete on.
- [140:50]
Podcast Announcer
And off the court. You'll even get to have some fun with the FUD family.
- [140:53]
Dana Schwartz
So if you follow me on social media or watch me on tv, you.
- [140:57]
Podcast Announcer
May think you know me, but this.
- [140:58]
Dana Schwartz
Show is the only place where you can really around and find out. Listen to FUT around and find out. A production of iHeart Women's Sports in.
- [141:06]
Podcast Announcer
Partnership with Unanimous Media on the iHeartRadio.
- [141:08]
Dana Schwartz
App, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [141:14]
Podcast Announcer
When I became a journalist, I was the first Latina in the newsrooms where I worked, I'm Maria Hinojosa.
- [141:19]
Dana Schwartz
I dreamt of having a place where.
- [141:21]
Podcast Announcer
Voices that have been historically sidelined would instead be centered. For over 30 years now, Latino USA has been that place. This is Latino USA, the radio journal of News and Cultura. As the longest running Latino news and culture show in the United States, Latino USA delivers the stories that truly matter to all of us. From sharp and deep analysis of the most pressing news, they're creating this narrative.
- [141:47]
Carl Casada
That immigrants are criminals.
- [141:49]
James Stout
This is about everyone's freedom of speech. Nobody expected two popes from the American.
- [141:55]
Podcast Announcer
Continent to stories about our cultures and our identities.
- [141:59]
Carl Casada
When you do get a trans character like Emilia Perez, the trans community is.
- [142:03]
Dana Schwartz
Going to push back on that colorism. All of these things that exist in Mexican culture and Latino culture.
- [142:09]
Podcast Announcer
You'll hear from people like Congresswoman aoc. I don't want to give them my fear. I'm not going to give them my fear.
- [142:15]
Dana Schwartz
Listen to Latino USA as part of.
- [142:17]
Podcast Announcer
The Mike Cultura Podcast Podcast network, available on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or.
- [142:22]
Dana Schwartz
Wherever you get your podcasts.
- [142:30]
James Stout
Welcome back, everyone, to Electile Dysfunction.
- [142:34]
Dana Schwartz
Electile. That's a new one.
- [142:35]
James Stout
Yes, yes, yes. The podcast about why President bad. Also why World bad. Also why America bad. I'm Robert Evans, introducer extraordinaire. With me today, Garrison Davis, Mia Wong, James Stout, eventually.
- [142:55]
Dana Schwartz
Special segment from James Stout later in the episode.
- [142:58]
James Stout
Yes, later. He is being held in custody by the ftc.
- [143:03]
Dana Schwartz
That's not true. You cannot say that because that is something that actually could happen over time. So unfortunately.
- [143:08]
Podcast Announcer
But he is not.
- [143:09]
James Stout
That's why I made it be the ftc.
- [143:11]
Podcast Announcer
Garrison, people will believe us.
- [143:13]
Dana Schwartz
I don't know. People will believe us.
- [143:14]
Podcast Announcer
We could get arrested by the FTC any day now.
- [143:16]
James Stout
We could get arrested for the FTC any day now. Thanks to the ads that I've been reading for British Petroleum, even though I. I exclusively use American Petroleum.
- [143:26]
Dana Schwartz
This episode we're covering the week of August 7th to August 13th. Yep. For note, it's just so we were. I think it's important to keep up because. Yeah, if people refer back these episodes, it's good to know what week we're talking about.
- [143:39]
James Stout
I don't usually remember what day it is, so. Yeah, good to do that. Good to remember what day it is. Mia, you want to start us off?
- [143:46]
Podcast Announcer
Yeah. I need to issue a correction about Sesame Street. I was wrong about Sesame Street's structure. We got a very sweet message from someone who works on the show about the way I talked about it being stripped for parts. Sesame street was never actually, like, ran by pbs. It was ran by its own independent nonprofit entity, Sesame Workshop, I believe. Yeah. Yes. It's not. Yeah. Not called Sesame Workshop. And so the episodes that were being streamed on HBO Max, and I think they're now. They've now moved to, like, Netflix. Those episodes all did still air on pbs. However, comma, they only aired nine months later. But yeah, I want to be clear about that. And then, Garrison, do you want to talk about PBS kind of not existing anymore?
- [144:28]
Dana Schwartz
Well, PBS may still find a way to exist, but specifically the corporation prefer public broadcasting, which helps facilitate the, you know, the funding and the structure and the operation of things like pbs. And your local npr, after being defunded by the Trump administration, is now going to shut down completely. So.
- [144:50]
Podcast Announcer
Yeah. And that's. And that's a lot of the. How a lot of the funding for rural networks particularly was able to function. If your PBS network is, like, mostly not funded by that or they can find other funding sources, it can survive. But. But real bad.
- [145:05]
Dana Schwartz
It's pretty disastrous for public media.
- [145:07]
Podcast Announcer
Yep.
- [145:08]
Dana Schwartz
And like NPR specifically and all of its local affiliates are some of the best, like, local news journalism across the country. And this is going to be a big hurdle to get over with the Loss of a, of like a giant in the, not just like the, like, national media space, but like, for journalism and as well as children's educational content.
- [145:27]
Podcast Announcer
And it's, you know, and it's worth mentioning too, like, this is one of the last as sort of local media and local radio and local newspapers have been carved out and gone out of business and destroyed the venture capital firms. NPR was like one of the last local journalism outlets left in a lot of places, especially in rural areas. And that's just getting worse. So we hate that.
- [145:51]
Carl Casada
Yeah.
- [145:52]
Podcast Announcer
This has been the Sesame street correction. I deeply apologize to the cast and, and crew and production staff of Sesame Street.
- [145:59]
James Stout
Yes. Sorry particularly to Grover. Not. Sorry to Elmo. No apologies to Elmo.
- [146:05]
Dana Schwartz
No. But we saw what Elmo was tweeting.
- [146:07]
James Stout
I'm on Larry David's side of that beef.
- [146:10]
Dana Schwartz
For our first main story this week, let's talk D.C. on Monday, Trump declared it was Liberation Day for the District of Columbia to, quote, unquote, take our Capitol back and officially invoke section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule act to place the D.C. metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control and order the Secretary of Defense to mobilize the D.C. national Guard to, quote, address the epidemic of crime in our nation's capital. Along with this announcement, Trump released a presidential memorandum reading, in part, quote, the local government of the District of Columbia has lost control of public order and safety in the city. The mobilization and duration of duty shall remain in effect until I determine that conditions of law and order have been restored in the District of Columbia. Robert, who in the past have you heard talk about federalizing the police?
- [147:11]
James Stout
Oh, gosh, I mean, just a couple of guys. There's this, there's this dude Hitler who, who, you know, worked with a guy named Herman G. Behring and Heinrich Himmler to do that back in the past. But that was in Germany, you know, a country totally different from the United States, almost three, four countries away from us. So not really, not really relevant at all to anything happening here.
- [147:36]
Podcast Announcer
And we can all rest assured it can't happen here.
- [147:38]
James Stout
Yeah, we're not Germans. We have a lot of Germans, but we're not Germans.
- [147:43]
Dana Schwartz
This is part of Yarvin's writing on, on how to take over the government. Centralizing the police is one of the key steps. Nationalizing local law enforcement, putting them under federal control. And here is a, here is another version of enacting such a, such a policy, mainly citing this, this, this crime epidemic in D.C. though, according to D.C. metropolitan Police and Their own crime figures. Violent offenses, which peaked in 2023 fell to their lowest in 2024, lowest time in over 30 years, and now in 2025 continue to fall even lower than that. Though Trump claims that these stats, just like the, just like the Bureau of Labor stats, are all made up or all fake. We'll get to that. These aren't, these aren't real stats and they're, they're assuming that there's, there's been fake, fake statisticians who have been covering up the real, the real crime wave happening across D.C. and even across the country. Trump cited three incidents leading to the federalization of of D.C. police. One, the assassination of two Israeli embassy staffers in May, a fatal shooting of a congressional intern in June, and most recently, an alleged violent carjacking of the Doge staffer known as Big Balls. And a possible future recipient of the Presidential Medal of Honor, or Freedom, one.
- [149:07]
James Stout
Of the medals only for military.
- [149:09]
Dana Schwartz
Yeah, well, you know, Big Bolt Balls, frankly, might have some military credentials based on how he survived this latest, this latest violent encounter. Who's to say this assault from a platoon of Romanians.
- [149:22]
Podcast Announcer
Yeah, quite frankly, I feel like we're only about six to eight months out from him getting like commissioned as a lieutenant and then them giving him the actual Medal of Honor.
- [149:32]
Dana Schwartz
That's what I'm saying.
- [149:33]
James Stout
For his courageous service, getting beaten up by two 15 year olds.
- [149:37]
Dana Schwartz
So this latest incident with Mr. Balls, I think is his official title at Doge or now the Social Security Administration.
- [149:48]
Podcast Announcer
Not related to Ed Balls?
- [149:50]
Dana Schwartz
No, different Balls.
- [149:51]
James Stout
But this latest incident, very different guy.
- [149:54]
Dana Schwartz
This latest incident with Mr. Balls seemed to tip Trump over, though. This is something that he has lofted for months and months. He's been wanting to do this. On Tuesday night, 43 arrests were made in D.C. in relation to the federal seizure of police. 1450 officers were part of this operation, half from D.C. metro Police, which are now federalized. So far, only 30 National Guard troops have been deployed, but around 800 are on the way. On Wednesday, Trump discussed extending his control of D.C. police past the 30 day limit.
- [150:31]
Podcast Announcer
Thank you, Mr. President. Your federalization of the police has a 30 day limit unless Congress, Congress acts to extend it. Are you talking to Congress about extending it, or do you believe 30 days is sufficient?
- [150:41]
James Stout
Well, if it's a national emergency, we can do it without Congress, but we expect to be to Congress before Congress very quickly.
- [150:48]
Podcast Announcer
And again, we think the Democrats will not do anything to stop crime, but.
- [150:52]
James Stout
We think the Republicans will do it almost unanimously. So we're going to need a crime.
- [150:57]
Podcast Announcer
Bill that we're going to be putting in and it's going to pertain. It's going to initially to D.C. it's almost. We're going to use it as a very positive example.
- [151:07]
James Stout
And we're going to be asking for extensions on that.
- [151:10]
Dana Schwartz
Long term extensions.
- [151:11]
James Stout
Because you can't have 30 days.
- [151:13]
Podcast Announcer
30 days is. That's by the time you do it, we're going to have this in good shape. And don't forget in the border, everyone said it would take years and you'd.
- [151:22]
James Stout
Have to go back to Congress. I never went to Congress for anything.
- [151:25]
Podcast Announcer
I just said close the border and they closed the border and that was the end of it.
- [151:31]
James Stout
I didn't go back to Congress. We're going to do this very quickly, but we're going to want extensions.
- [151:36]
Dana Schwartz
I don't want to call national emergency.
- [151:38]
Podcast Announcer
If I have to, I will.
- [151:39]
James Stout
But I think the Republicans in Congress will approve this pretty much unanimously.
- [151:46]
Podcast Announcer
Don't like that.
- [151:48]
Dana Schwartz
No, it's pretty dictatorial on like a. Yep. Base level is quote, if it's a national emergency, we can do it without Congress.
- [151:55]
Podcast Announcer
Mm. It's. It's very Palpatine emergency powers coded.
- [151:59]
Dana Schwartz
And I'm not sure if Lucas was pulling on any real world examples for Star wars, the prequels or if he was just pulling all that shit out of his ass. Who knows? It seemed pretty fanciful. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told his former co workers on Fox News that it's unknown how long DC will be under this militarized occupation.
- [152:22]
Podcast Announcer
He's got the guts to say, I'm gonna federalize the police that don't work. I'm gonna bring in the National Guard, I'm gonna bring in federal marshals, I'm gonna bring in the park police. How long. What is the.
- [152:34]
Dana Schwartz
Well, it costs money, right?
- [152:35]
James Stout
Sure, it does cost. It costs money.
- [152:37]
Dana Schwartz
And the question is, are you there.
- [152:40]
James Stout
For a year, are you there for six months?
- [152:41]
Dana Schwartz
And when the troops pull out, what happens?
- [152:44]
Podcast Announcer
I would call this conditions based.
- [152:46]
Dana Schwartz
I would say it's a situation where.
- [152:48]
Podcast Announcer
We'Re here to support law enforcement and the more we can free them up to do their job, the more effective they can be. The more we can work.
- [152:55]
James Stout
I mean, this isn't my realm, but.
- [152:56]
Podcast Announcer
The justice system to make sure people who are arrested are actually locked up. That's why the President's talking about cashless bail in sanctuary cities. If you're illegal here in D.C. that's going to be a problem. So all of these things that apply to law and order are front and center for us and I don't know, weeks, months, what will it take? That's the problem. President's call. But we're going to be there for him to execute as swiftly as possible.
- [153:17]
Dana Schwartz
Conditions based.
- [153:19]
Podcast Announcer
It's real, like, war in Iraq vibes.
- [153:21]
James Stout
Yeah, a lot of those these days. Yeah, a lot of mission accomplished coming out of the Trump administration, too, because they've learned that, like, there's no consequence in just saying, like, yeah, we closed the border and we won. The borders won. You know, it's done. No one's going to get to their base with a counter opinion that matters.
- [153:42]
Dana Schwartz
As bad as things are in D.C. right now, this is just the start of what they want to do. Trump seeks to make a quote, unquote example of DC but soon wants to go further and attempt this in other cities, first naming places like Chicago and Los Angeles, then later New York, Baltimore and Oakland.
- [154:02]
Podcast Announcer
We have other cities that are very bad.
- [154:03]
James Stout
New York has a problem.
- [154:05]
Podcast Announcer
And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland.
- [154:09]
James Stout
We don't even mention that anymore.
- [154:10]
Podcast Announcer
They're so, they're so far gone.
- [154:13]
Dana Schwartz
We're not going to let it happen.
- [154:14]
James Stout
We're not going to lose our cities over this.
- [154:17]
Podcast Announcer
And this will go further. We're starting very strongly with D.C. and we're going to clean it up real quick, very quickly.
- [154:25]
Dana Schwartz
As they say, we're not going to lose our cities over this. That gets into, like, the core part of their framing this, this idea that homeless people and criminals cough, cough, black people are making us lose, like, lose our cities. They're so far gone. And this is necessary for such reasons. And, like, you can look at that pretty clearly. And he's naming, like, Oakland, Baltimore, Chicago, New York. Like, it's, it's, it's not, it's not very masked here.
- [154:53]
Podcast Announcer
Yeah.
- [154:53]
Dana Schwartz
I talked with D.C. resident Bridget Todd this morning. We should have an episode with her perspective coming out early next week, I think Sunday night.
- [155:04]
James Stout
I wrote an episode earlier this year laying out, you know, some of my predictions for the year. And this, along with weird terrorism, were two of, like, my big ones. Right. That DC in particular, he would be attempting to fill with soldiers and probably invoke the Insurrection Act. Now, one thing that I have been surprised on is that they really do seem kind of hesitant to go full in on the Insurrection Act. And obviously I didn't expect LA to get troops deployed in it before dc but just based on what they were saying, like after the election, kind of as he was preparing to take office, it was Very clear that they were looking at DC as a focus in part because they had, you know, during his last term as well. Right. This is not entirely unprecedented, but his desire to specifically not just take away any sort of autonomy that the city has and put it under direct federal control, but to see troops in the streets, federal agents in the streets, is not surprising. It's. It's something that, like, it's not even. Shouldn't. I honestly shouldn't even call it a prediction. It's just something he's been repeatedly saying he's going to do. So the fact that it's happening now, you know, the only thing that's surprising to me is that it happened in LA first. Right. And that they really do seem to have. And who knows, you know, this could change by the time the episode airs. But they do seem to have something of. I don't know, a block is the right way to phrase it, but they don't seem yet willing to go for the Insurrection Act. That still seems to be a bridge too far for some reason. Reason I'm not 100% sure why.
- [156:34]
Podcast Announcer
I think. I think they're worried about, like, massive backlash to it. Like, they're really unpopular and they also.
- [156:41]
Dana Schwartz
Just don't need to.
- [156:42]
James Stout
Yeah, and that's. That's a fair point, Gare. Yeah.
- [156:44]
Podcast Announcer
They.
- [156:45]
Dana Schwartz
They have this, like, section 740 to call on, and if Trump's going to try to get Congress to pass a new crime bill that can allow them to do this kind of stuff without having to use the Insurrection Act. So I think it's more of, like, a matter of necessity.
- [156:57]
Podcast Announcer
Yeah.
- [156:57]
James Stout
Maybe just a risk they don't think they need to take. Yeah.
- [157:00]
Dana Schwartz
And, like, who knows what type of weird shit they would try to push into a crime bill, including exceptions for almost any city to have their police force be federalized.
- [157:09]
Podcast Announcer
I think the interesting part of this to me is also, though, that, like, it feels like a lot of what their politics is is, like, the spectacle of making it look like there's power there versus, like, actually doing the thing, because, like, you can't actually hold D.C. with 800 National Guards. And, like, you know, if you look at what happened in la, they kind of, like, declared victory, but then the actual thing they came there to do, which was, like, do this, like, unprecedented mass deportation wave, they did some of it, and then they got ran out of the city. And so I think. I don't know, I think there's a kind of apocalyptic framing of this where it's like, okay, well, it's over. They can just do this. But also it has not been going well for them. And like, was it from D.C. the video of the guy. Of the guy just like throwing a sandwich at the National Guard?
- [157:58]
Dana Schwartz
Throwing a Subway sandwich. Yes.
- [158:00]
Podcast Announcer
Yeah.
- [158:00]
James Stout
Right.
- [158:00]
Podcast Announcer
Like actual regular people really don't like them. And I think, I think we're just going to see escalating resistance as more than like fucking 80 guys get deployed there. And I don't know, it's unclear to me whether they can actually just like maintain this or if they're just going to say like, we did it, Joe, in like 30 days and pull out. Right.
- [158:20]
Dana Schwartz
That's kind of what some of the rhetoric looks like, is that they're gonna try to arrest as many homeless people as they can, put them in jails, lock them up into hospitals, like the executive order that we mentioned a few weeks ago.
- [158:31]
Podcast Announcer
Yeah.
- [158:31]
Dana Schwartz
And like scare teenagers. And that's most of what they want out of this. And they're gonna make a big show of it. And then they'll. Yeah. Declare that the city is now safe. And then they'll use the legitimate crime stats showing crime falling and be like, look, we proved it. So that. I think that is probably what it will, what it will turn out to be. But if they try to push forward a new crime bill like Trump is mentioning or, or call it a national emergency to help strengthen his own powers, I think that's indications that this could have some longer lasting results. Let's go on an ad break and return to talk tariff. I suppose.
- [159:11]
James Stout
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. We'll, we'll get to. And we're back. And obviously the big tariff news this week as we'll get to. Well, one of the pieces of big tariff news is that Trump has ordered another extension of the kind of delay before enacting tariffs against China. You might say Trump looked at his tariffs against China and decided tariff hino like it. Okay, that was my intro. Mia. Mia, talk tariffs.
- [160:07]
Podcast Announcer
Honestly. Okay, so this is kind of a light tariff news week. There isn't that much also, because if you want to hear me talking about tariffs for like 45 minutes, go listen to the episode on Wednesday.
- [160:19]
James Stout
You just did a tariff episode. I just really wanted to lead into the tariff thing that way.
- [160:23]
Dana Schwartz
Yeah, no, there is actually a very important piece of tariff news today. Arizona iced tea is considering raising prices for the first time in over 30 years due to Trump's 50% aluminum tariffs.
- [160:37]
James Stout
All right, everyone get off the call right now. It is time to riot. Find the building, burn it down. No, this is. This is not a drill.
- [160:47]
Dana Schwartz
Not acceptable. Arizona iced tea has been the shining beacon resisting inflation for. For decades. The proof, proof that inflation is fake is on every Arizona iced tea can. And if Trump's gonna take that away from us, burn the whole system down.
- [161:08]
James Stout
Yeah, that's it.
- [161:09]
Dana Schwartz
I want the Arizona.
- [161:10]
James Stout
I don't.
- [161:11]
Dana Schwartz
The CEO handing out cans to throw at your. At your local government building of choice to defend the 99 cent can. It's one of the most important aspects of American culture.
- [161:26]
James Stout
It's the only thing left of the American dream.
- [161:29]
Dana Schwartz
Yes, it's.
- [161:29]
James Stout
The one last piece of the American dream is a 99 cent can of Arizona iced tea. That's all we have left.
- [161:36]
Dana Schwartz
50% aluminium tariffs will not take this away from us.
- [161:40]
Podcast Announcer
US aluminium.
- [161:41]
James Stout
Yeah, no, just. Just move past it, man. Forget it. It's. It's Canadian.
- [161:46]
Carl Casada
We're going on.
- [161:47]
Podcast Announcer
Okay. This is actually a good way to pivot into the just complete mess at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. So one of the things that Trump has been really harping on is so the Bureau of Labor Statistics published a jobs report and it was bad jobs, no good. And Trump has been absolutely furious about this ever since. And we will actually come back, back to. I think, like, we will literally come back to the Arizona cans after this.
- [162:11]
Dana Schwartz
Thank God.
- [162:12]
Podcast Announcer
But come on. However. Good lord, the people they are trying to put in office right now. I. So long ago in the galaxy far, far away, I made an argument that the Trump regime is built on pure stupidity, that there is no plan at all. There is only, you know, a ravening maw of the oblivion of reason that obliterates all attempts to comprehend it and leaves only the words, yes, they really are that stone stupid. And this argument was about a guy named Stefan Mirren, who was Trump's chair of the Council of Economic Advisors, and his plan to, like, make other countries pay taxes on holding U.S. bonds, a thing that is just unequivocally good for the United States. And, you know, this is a plan. You can go back and listen to that episode from a few months ago. This is a plan so monumentally stupid that the only way I could think of describing it was like yelling at the moon to stop the tide. Anyways, Trump is trying to get that guy appointed to be one of the board members of the Federal Reserve. And the staggering thing about that isn't just that he's doing this, it's that, like, this is not the guy who's in the news right now for being unbelievably stupid. And Getting appointed to an extremely important structural agency of the American economy because they are trying to appoint point senior economist at the Heritage Foundation, E.J. antony as the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after they fired the last head for like releasing the jobs report, right? This guy, ok, I make fun of economists for being dumb as shit all the time. He might legitimately be the stupidest economist I have ever seen. Just on blue sky, like the day this was announced, right? I saw someone dunking on him for drawing a chart where he doesn't seem to understand that people were tiring and that when they retire they're not in the labor force anymore. Where he was doing this trend line that was based on the assumption that like people wouldn't retire. There are so many. Just incredibly basic economics. Since he doesn't understand. There's a post that I saw, this is the first one, that was the second one that I saw. The first one that I saw, and it's really funny because this is like in the New York Times now, but I just like saw this On Blue sky was this post by this economist named Joey Politano who said, said, quote, an economist so dumb I had to explain to him how the price index works will now lead to bls. Kill me.
- [164:32]
James Stout
Great.
- [164:33]
Podcast Announcer
So he was doing his thing where he was like posting the price index and being like, prices aren't going up. But the thing about the import price index is that it calculates prices pre tariffs, okay? So of course they wouldn't go up because they're not calculating the tariffs. And he was posting this as like, no, see, the terrorists don't do inflation. He is, he's being chosen for this position because he is just like a rigid ideologue of the Trump administration, right? But he's also, he's so fucking stupid that things are happening. I have never seen with right wing economists before where other right wing economists are going. Like, this guy can't be allowed to take office. He's going to fuck everything up because he's too dumb. Like, I am watching economists at the Manhattan Institute, which is an organization that was literally founded by Reagan's director of the CIA, William Casey, right?
- [165:22]
Dana Schwartz
Like that.
- [165:23]
Podcast Announcer
The Manhattan Institute is a right wing institute, right? Like again, this is, this is, this is an organization founded by Ronald fucking Reagan's CIA director. And I am watching those people go, this guy is too stupid to be put in office. Please don't put him there. This is unprecedented. I've never seen right wing economists break rank on the sort of like affirmative action program. They all have for like, like really, really underachieving right wing shithead economists. It's astonishing. And so, and the reason he's being brought in, this is also the reason he was like the chief economist, the Heritage foundation, is that he has been calling for getting rid of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and also thinks that again, like, like Trump does it. They've been like cooking the books to make Democrats look good and Republicans look bad. And so if he gets appointed, this also like goes through the second Senate. But him being appointed here effectively signals the end of independent economic data from the federal government.
- [166:22]
James Stout
Hooray.
- [166:24]
Podcast Announcer
Which is a just catastrophic. Like, every single part of the governments, every policy organization, every, like, every, every single element, every corporation, every element of the entire US Economic system relies on this data being nonpartisan and accurate. And it's obviously like, yeah, all, like, all data is political, but like, it being like reasonably accurate is like the defining thing about the US economy is that this data is there and functions. This is what everyone base their decisions off of. And he very much looks like he wants to just end that. And I want to close by noting that like one of, you know, at the very end of the Soviet Union, right, one of the things that was taken as like the giant signal that things were going to shit there was that like their leadership by like the like the mid late 80s was deploying satellites. Satellites specifically, so they could use satellite imagery to check the output of their own factories because their control of the economic statistics had become so like, just annihilated, right, by just like mass falsification. Their loss of control over the standards of their measuring regime was seen as like, this is the regime falling apart and we are like eight months out from Google doing that shit, right? Like, we are not very far out from companies doing a thing you have to do with like remote provinces in China where their fault, where like there's data falsification of like, like, okay, we're like using satellite data to like measure freight loads and like measure electrical consumption and like figuring out what factories are open at night to figure out how much. That's, you know, that that is something that is very much in our future. I'm only kind of joking about the satellite shit. I think we probably will live to see that. Assuming this thing goes through.
- [168:04]
Dana Schwartz
Assuming they remember how to launch satellites.
- [168:07]
Podcast Announcer
Well, it won't, it won't be them. It'll be, it'll be like corporations doing this. Oh, sure, sure, yeah, like using their own satel.
- [168:14]
Dana Schwartz
I mean, I can, I can, I can See the. Yeah. The blue origin satellites launching to keep track of. To keep track of Amazon's efficiency.
- [168:23]
Podcast Announcer
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Oh, good Lord. Yeah. I want to close on, like, one final brief note, which I've said this before, but I want to say it again. This is the exact thing that, like, one is one of the big things that brought down the military dictatorship in Brazil was that they were lying about inflation data. You know, the thing about, about inflation is that you can just see the price of the Arizona can go up.
- [168:45]
James Stout
Just like you can see Huey, Dewey and Louie expand in our favorite inflation fetish pornography.
- [168:51]
Podcast Announcer
They don't give me hazard pay for this. They really should hazard.
- [168:57]
James Stout
I feel like this is a bonus.
- [169:00]
Podcast Announcer
Oh, I guess this is also mentioned. Part of the reason they're trying to put this, like, absolute clown on the board of the Federal Reserve is that they want to replace the chairman of the Federal Reserve so that Trump can just directly sell interest rates. That's a looming crisis that is coming.
- [169:16]
Dana Schwartz
Trump is threatening to sue the head of the Federal Reserve right now.
- [169:19]
Podcast Announcer
Oh, yeah. Yep, yep, yep, yep, yep.
- [169:21]
James Stout
He is. He sure is. Which is a fascinating, gonna be amazing precedent. I am excited.
- [169:27]
Podcast Announcer
Oh, it's, it's astonishing. I don't know. It's been very funny because a lot of the kind of internal publications from, like, the banks about this have been like, ah, if you remove Jerome Powell, it's not that big of a deal. Like, the banks can like, autonomously set interest rates technically without the chairman of the Federal Reserve. And it's like, okay, I don't think you understand how bad this is going to get. So we're still, we're still in cope. I don't know. We'll report to you back on this show when all of that enormous clusterfuck blows up. Yay.
- [170:02]
Dana Schwartz
Before we go on break again, I'd like to have an update for one of the stories we talked about last week. Week, the Texas Democrats fleeing to Illinois and then later to California to brick warm to stop or delay a redistricting vote in Texas. And now Texas Democrats are set to come back home possibly as soon as this weekend.
- [170:22]
James Stout
Yes.
- [170:22]
Dana Schwartz
After Governor Greg Abbott ended the special session to redraw the congressional map, which would add five new Republican House seats, with some Democrats expected to return very soon. Nothing stops Abbott from just calling another special session once the Democrats return. In fact, he has said that that's exactly what he's going to do.
- [170:42]
James Stout
He's definitely going to do that. Yes.
- [170:45]
Dana Schwartz
And add in new legislation to convince some of them to Stay. So we will see. They can just leave the state again if they want to. Unclear if. Unclear if they will. I mean, other states are threatening retaliatory redistricting, specifically the governors of New York and California. This is going to be a really annoying mess with different, with different states all redrawing their maps just to create some kind of congressional balance. Florida also threatening to do the same. So we will, we will see how this develops over time. But yeah, Texas Dems may be home sooner than expected.
- [171:22]
Podcast Announcer
It's so cool that on the one hand you have the Republicans creating the image of tyranny and then expanding their actual power and then you have the Democrats doing the image of resistance and then giving in.
- [171:32]
Dana Schwartz
I mean, they're not really giving in yet.
- [171:34]
Podcast Announcer
Yeah, we'll see. We'll see.
- [171:35]
Dana Schwartz
But they are going home because the session is ended.
- [171:39]
Podcast Announcer
Yeah.
- [171:39]
Dana Schwartz
What still remains to be seen is if they will flee the state a second time like a week later.
- [171:45]
Podcast Announcer
Yeah.
- [171:45]
Carl Casada
Which.
- [171:46]
Podcast Announcer
Who knows? I have little faith in that. But we'll see.
- [171:49]
Dana Schwartz
Yeah, I'm, I'm not sure at this point.
- [171:51]
Podcast Announcer
Yeah.
- [171:51]
Dana Schwartz
But I thought we should include that small update there. And now we should include a secondary ad break.
- [172:00]
James Stout
Foreign.
- [172:08]
Dana Schwartz
We are back in other news, last week on Friday, a mass shooting was targeted against the CDCE headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia. The 30 year old shooter broke into his father's safe to retrieve. Five firearms were then used in the attack. The shooting started at a CVS across from the CDC main entrance. Shooter then fired upon six buildings on the CDC campus with a total of 500 rounds being fired during the incident with 200 shots hitting CDC buildings. One DeKalb County Police Officer was killed. The shooter later shot and killed himself. Police were contacted several weeks before the shooting by unknown individuals due to, quote, recently verbalized thoughts of suicide. According to the GBI director Chris Hosey, this was about the soon to become shooter. Police found written documents from the shooter expressing distrust in the COVID 19 vaccine. Georgia Bureau of Investigation Director Hosey said the shooter, quote, wanted to make the public awareness of his discontent with and distrust of the vaccine, unquote. With sources who knew him telling ABC News he blamed the vaccine for making him sick and depressed. The CDC director sent a letter to its 10,000 employees earlier this week saying, quote, the dangers of misinformation and its promulgation has now led to deadly consequences, unquote. The Monday after the shooting, RFK Jr. Oh no. Who recently defunded MRNA vaccines visited the CDC campus to express condolences for the family of the Officer killed, as well as to, quote, offer support to all of the CDC employees who are a part of a shining star health agency around the world, unquote, to quote from an interview he gave with Scripps News. When Kennedy was asked what would be done to stop the spread of vaccine misinformation to prevent future incidents like this shooting, Kennedy said, quote, people can ask questions without being penalized, and, quote, we don't know enough about what the motive was of this individual. Unquote.
- [174:24]
Podcast Announcer
Hate that.
- [174:25]
Dana Schwartz
So that's all pretty. Pretty disgusting.
- [174:27]
Podcast Announcer
Yeah.
- [174:28]
Dana Schwartz
Seeing narratives that RFK Jr. Has promoted for his own profit for years.
- [174:33]
James Stout
Yep.
- [174:33]
Dana Schwartz
Being used to justify a shooting targeting the CDC headquarters.
- [174:37]
James Stout
Yeah. And it's. You know, it's kind of unclear exactly what. Because it seems like he was shooting at the buildings. He fired at least 200 rounds, roughly 200 rounds into the buildings. About 500 rounds fired total. But I've seen people say that means he was, like, shot 500. He did not. A lot of those rounds are the police.
- [174:57]
Dana Schwartz
No, that's the total.
- [174:58]
James Stout
Most of them are the police. You know, two or 300 rounds would not at all be odd for. How many police would fire in response to a guy like this who is just bagged up, jumping, you know, into a building? It's unclear to me. Did he see people through the windows and was he trying to hit them, or was he just shooting at the buildings to make a statement? The fact that he did shoot and kill a police officer, presumably with intent, makes it more likely that maybe he was trying to hit people inside the building. I don't know how much it's worth splitting hairs here, but I am, like, it is kind of unclear to me. Was his goal more to make a statement or was he hoping to. Yeah, like, rack up a body count of CDC employees and this was just as close as he could get? I. I don't think we really know. Maybe. We probably never will.
- [175:42]
Dana Schwartz
It. It. It seems he had trouble accessing or getting close to some buildings on the CDC campus. This was mostly done from the CVS, which he. @ a certain point, according to police reports, he could not get out of. He was locked inside the cvs. What, and tried to exit by shooting, like, the windows and. And doors and. And was unable to. And then killed himself inside.
- [176:05]
Carl Casada
Huh. Jeez.
- [176:07]
Dana Schwartz
So it is a kind of odd situation. We don't have a clear idea yet because this just happened a few days ago. We. We don't have a clear idea yet of, like, the exact on the ground situation. Just these kind of general, general facts about. About which buildings were hit and how many shots were fired and then the anti vax like opinions and writing foundations allegedly in his home.
- [176:29]
James Stout
Yeah, so we'll see more will come out about this in time. But I mean the basics are pretty clear, which is that this is the natural extension of decades of anti vaccine rhetoric and specifically the last several years of RFK relentlessly attacking the cdc.
- [176:48]
Dana Schwartz
Another piece of news this week that I should mention, though, frankly we don't have much to say on this because it's unclear this will actually turn into anything real or not. Not. But later this fall, the Supreme Court will consider whether to take a case that could overturn the national ruling on gay marriage. The specific case that they would be considering has not done very well in all lower federal courts, which is why it's been appealed to this level. The just the legal justifications used for the First Amendment have not made much progress in federal appeals courts so far. If the case does get chosen, it would be primarily for like, ideological reasons based on specific new Supreme Court justices. But it is still unclear if this will get accepted and I'm thinking not super likely. I don't think this is something that we need to have tons of panic about at the moment.
- [177:41]
Podcast Announcer
So something that, I mean, I don't know if panic's the right word, but did actually happen and is very bad. Is that so Trump issued an executive order a while back about like getting rid of collective bargaining rights for a bunch of different kinds of government employees. Like nominally under the auspices of national security. There had been a whole bunch of court cases kind of winding their way through the courts. But last week the VA became the first government agency to actually do it. They just straight up got rid of the union contracts for 377,000 workers. Like 377,000 workers is an astonishing number of workers who just straight up, the union doesn't exist the next day. Yeah, right, because they just their con. Their contracts aren't being recognized. This in and of itself is really stunning. And also the lack of response by the union movement, especially considering the number of people involved. It's just been like strongly worded statements and encouragements for the Democrats to pass a bill through Congress to like recognize collective bargaining rights, which speaks really, really ill of the broader labor movement that like, again, they just, they just took away the unions of almost 400,000 people. And organized labor's collective response was just to kind of shrug. So that's really fucking bleak. It's probably going to be spreading to More agencies as this plays out. Yeah, it's really, I don't know, even the language, unions abusing to talk about it, they're like, oh, this is union busting for speaking out against anti worker policies. And it's like, no, it's union busting because they literally got rid of the union of 377,000 people. What are we doing here? I don't know. I'm gonna have more on this as I get more word from union sources. There's a staggering lack of information about this and people are being slow to respond. But I want to mention it here because it's devastating and hideous and yeah, it's real fucking bad.
- [179:34]
Dana Schwartz
Before we close this episode, James Stout has a special report on immigration and information about a fundraiser. James?
- [179:43]
James Stout
All right, so immigration report. With the change of the month, children across the country are returning to schools. This means that ICE agents are also returning to enforcement at schools. Not just ICE agents, as we know, other federal agents, Border Patrol, atf, dea, etc are all taking part in immigration enforcement now. They're no longer restrained by the sensitive places doctrine, which previously stopped them from doing enforcement at schools, churches and other places where it's generally considered not worth it because doing so obviously provides a massive disincentive for families to take their children to school. In this instance in Chula Vista, second largest city in the county of San Diego, ICE age detained a parent a block away from a school, leaving two young children in the car. Are like most schools in the area, Chula Vista Elementary School District will not allow ICE on campus without a warrant unless there's an active emergency. Just to explain the active emergency thing a bit, I guess, for instance in Uvalde, because all the local cops were cowards and stood outside, it was actually a border patrol team, Bortak specifically who killed the shooter there. So like that would be an example of when immigration agents might enter a campus during an active emergency. In Los Angeles, a 15 old year year old boy with disabilities was pulled from a car, handcuffed and detained by federal agents at gunpoint. He was accompanying a relative who was road string at a school and he was in the car with his grandmother. The agents, who appear to be border patrol from videos I've seen, released the boy after intervention by school staff and left live ammunition on the sidewalk for some reason. These look like 5, 5, 6 rounds from the pictures I've seen. I mean, I'm guessing it's just terrible weapons handling procedures here. It appears that this boy was not the person they were looking for. But nonetheless, they've obviously horrifically traumatized this, this young man for. For no good reason. In response, LA Unified School District is ramping up safety patrols. These include volunteers, teachers and school cops apparently. Obviously school cops cannot directly prevent immigration enforcement officers from doing immigration enforcement, but they can, can notify people of their presence and they're trying to have safe zones around schools so that people can either safely walk to school or safely drop their kids off. They're also changing their bus programs. Buses are part of school districts property. Right. So just as ICE could not enter a school without a warrant, nor could they enter that bus without a warrant and it would be within the training of the bus driver to deny them access if they did not have a warrant. Warrant.
- [182:16]
Podcast Announcer
Right.
- [182:17]
James Stout
So the bus would potentially be a much safer way for people to get to school than having their parents drive them. And so what LAUSD is doing is expanding their bus programs in la. I've seen a lot of information on this in the resource guide that was published by the LA Office of Immigration Affairs. So now is a good time to remind everyone that San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria defunded the San Diego Office of Immigrant affairs because he refuses to stop giving the carpenter a fire hose of our money. This has left migrants in one of America's largest border cities even more vulnerable. We're also doing a fundraiser this week. We're going to fundraise for Bouquet again. I'm going to go see her later this week. I know she has hearings coming up. Bouquet, for those who do not remember, is an Alevi Kurdish woman because of her ethnicity and religion region. She wasn't safe in Turkey and she came to the USA to ask for refuge. She's been in San Diego for six months right now and she is trying to raise money for her asylum case. She can't work because she doesn't have a work permit and she has cancer which is obviously something which is very difficult for her to manage alongside the massive stress of immigration enforcement. Right now she needs to raise $7,000 to pay her lawyer. I'm looking at the GoFundMe as I record this and it is at $1,941. If you would like to help you can go to www.gofundme.com f urgent help 4buket b u k E T S asylum case. Or you can just go down to the show notes and click the link. We really appreciate all the support you guys have given.
- [184:10]
Dana Schwartz
Thank you to James for that.
- [184:12]
James Stout
Well, I guess that's our week.
- [184:14]
Dana Schwartz
We reported the news.
- [184:16]
Podcast Announcer
We reported the news.
- [184:23]
James Stout
Hey, we'll be back Monday with more episodes every week from now until the heat death of the universe.
- [184:29]
Dana Schwartz
It Could Happen Here is a production.
- [184:31]
Podcast Announcer
Of Cool Zone Media.
- [184:32]
Dana Schwartz
For more podcasts from Cool Zone Media, Visit our website coolzonemedia.com or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can now find sources for It Could Happen here listed directly in Episode Descriptions. Thanks for listening.
- [184:51]
Podcast Announcer
Iheart presents the Big three Playoffs this Sunday.
- [184:54]
Andrew Sage
The remaining four teams battle to make.
- [184:56]
Carl Casada
Their championship in the most physical, fierce and competitive basketball league in the world.
- [185:00]
Podcast Announcer
The action starts with the Big Three Monster Energy Celebrity Games, then Dwight Howard and his LA Riot take on Montrez Harrell and Dr. J Chicago Triplets. The finale will see popular Miami 305.
- [185:09]
Carl Casada
With stars MVP Michael Beasley and Lance.
- [185:12]
Podcast Announcer
Stevenson take on Nancy Lieberman's Dallas Power, who will make it to the Big Three championship.
- [185:16]
Carl Casada
The no holds barred action starts Sunday at 3pm Eastern, 12 Pacific only on CBS.
- [185:22]
Podcast Announcer
Have you ever looked at a piece of Apple abstract art or music or poetry and thought that's just a bunch of pretentious nonsense?
- [185:28]
James Stout
That's exactly what two bored Australian soldiers.
- [185:30]
Podcast Announcer
Set out to prove during World War II when they tricked the literary world with their intentionally bad poetry, setting off a major scandal. We break down the truth, the lies and the poetry in between on Hoax, a new podcast hosted by me, Lizzie Logan and me, Dana Schwartz.
- [185:45]
Dana Schwartz
Every episode, Hoax explores an audacious fraud.
- [185:49]
Podcast Announcer
Or ruse from his mystery. Listen to hoax on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. If you're looking for another heavy podcast about trauma, the saying it this is for the ones who had to survive and still show up as brilliant, loud, soft and whole.
- [186:07]
James Stout
The Unwanted Sorority is where black women.
- [186:09]
Podcast Announcer
Femmes and gender expansive survivors of sexual violence rewrite the rules on healing, support.
- [186:14]
Dana Schwartz
And what happens after after.
- [186:15]
Podcast Announcer
And I'm your host and co president of this organization, Dr. Lea Tritate.
- [186:20]
James Stout
Listen to the Unwanted Sorority.
- [186:21]
Podcast Announcer
New episodes every Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. What would you do if one bad decision forced you to choose between a maximum security prison or the most brutal boot camp designed to be hell on Earth? Unfortunately for Mark Lombardo, this was the choice he faced. He said, you are a number, a.
- [186:44]
Carl Casada
New York State number and we own you.
- [186:47]
Podcast Announcer
Listen to Shock incarceration on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. This is an iHeart podcast.