A (0:00)

This is an iHeart podcast. Guaranteed Human no one knows what the future holds, but you deserve a weather app that can help. Weatherbug is easy to use and provides forecasts for your every need from storm warnings to pollen levels right at your fingertips. Get the fastest local Alerts and comprehensive 10 day forecasts wherever you are. Its hyperlocal real time customizable alerts. Make sure the weather never takes you by surprise so you can plan every day with confidence. Download the free Weatherbug app from the App Store today and start getting accurate weather forecasts forecasts 247 when your schedule sounds like this. Are you kidding me? An oil change is the last thing you have time for. So drive into Take five and let our techs change your oil. Check your tires, top off your fluids and have you back on the road pit stop fast. All while you stay in your car. No putting your entire schedule on hold. No upsells, no problem. So you can get back to your to do list or not. Find your nearest shop@take5.com take five the stay in your car 10 minute oil change. There's a fire inside you you can't ignore. Stand still. Not a chance. You're a lifelong learner who's come this far. Now we are here to help you keep going further. Capella University what can't you do? Visit capella.edu to learn more. Support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now gener assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index. With AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors llc. SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete Disclosures available@public.com Disclosures hey, everybody. Robert Evans here. And I wanted to let you know this is a compilation episode. So every episode of the week that just happened is here in one convenient and with somewhat less ads package for you to listen to in a long stretch if you want. If you've been listening to the episodes every day this week, there's going to be nothing new here for you, but you can make your own decisions. Welcome to It Could Happen Here, a show about things falling apart. The thing falling apart this week is me. After watching nine hours of Clinton testimony the past two days, I can relate. I'm Garrison Davis. I'm joined by Sophie Lichterman to discuss. Hi, guys. Hey, Sophie. Hey. To discuss the Clinton testimony. I was gonna say can relate after, you know, you fortunately missed that Clinton speech at The DNC in 2024. Bill Clinton. That was a really, really, really, really long hour of my life. That's a long speech for, for a guy of that age too. Yeah. But we were together during Hillary's speech. We did catch that. While we're in the pit. I think that's when I got Covid. I got the Clinton Covid. Hillary got Covid too at the dnc. So I think she gave it to me. There you go. That's when we were up close and personal with the Clintons last. Now they're back. They've never been more back. They've never been more. I completely agree. If you don't want to hear the voices, I've tried to limit it, but there's going to be some. The voices of Hillary and or Bill Clinton. This is your chance. If you want to hear me talk about Hillary being asked about everything from spies to aliens and QAnon pizza gate, this is your sign to continue. Yeah. So I'm excited. Let's do this. Yeah, let's get started. Because there is probably more, more to cover than what we'll be able to sort of. On February 26th and 27th, Hillary and Bill Clinton respectively testified in closed door hearings about their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The Clintons were first subpoenaed to testify in this bipartisan House Oversight Committee investigation into the DOJ's handling of the Epstein investigation. Back in August of 2025, for months they pushed back against having to testify, arguing the process was politically motivated, that the subpoenas were quote, unquote invalid and legally unenforceable, and that any relevant information they had could be delivered via a signed statement. In January of 2026, Chairman James Comer advanced two resolutions recommending the Clintons be held in contempt of Congress for refusing to comply days before a vote to hold them in contempt. The Clintons finally agree to testify in February. Yeah, to be fair, they did let other people give little shitty statements. They sure did. That is something that Hillary specifically brought up during. During her deposition more than once. Yes. So let's start with Hillary's, because that was the first one. Yeah. In her opening statement, she said she had no knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal activities, did not ever recall encountering Jeffrey Epstein whatsoever, never flown on the plane or visited his island homes or offices. Glenn Maxwell dated a family friend around 2010 named Ted Waite, who was a software developer. Waite brought Ghislaine to Hillary's daughter's Chelsea's wedding as a Plus One guest in 2010. And Hillary says she was unaware of any criminal activity relating to Ghislaine Maxwell specifically before her crimes were publicly revealed a few years ago. Hillary's asked to recount the origin of the Clintown foundation, which Hillary only joined the board of in 2013 because she was busy serving in office. Hillary was asked about Glenn Maxwell leading a breakout session on ocean conservation at a Clinton Global initiative conference in 2013. Hillary said that she was not involved in the selection process for those sessions, but that Glenn Maxwell had been an internationally recognized ocean advocate around that time. Hillary refused to answer a question about whether her husband is a quote, unquote, smart guy, which was. Who asked that question? I forget, but I had that note written down. Some of these things I was watching pretty, pretty late. Yeah. Yeah. What a great question. Hey, Hill, babe, is your husband a smart guy? Wow. Glad our tax dollars are funding such an important question. She said that her husband had a limited relationship with Epstein for a limited time. Yes. Used his airplane for Clinton foundation trips. And this connection began and ended before any of Epstein's crimes were publicly revealed. Representative Pat Fallon with the Republican majority talked about how Jeffrey Epstein visited the White House 17 times under the Clinton administration. This is mostly for White House Historical association events and donated money to the White House Historical association, but said that Epstein never visited under Trump or donated money to Trump. This could, in fact, just be simply because the Trump admin. You know, Trump came into office after Trump's relationship with Epstein fell through. And Epstein was convicted of sex crimes. Correct. Trump got into office in 2016. Clinton was in office in the early 90s. Yeah. That's why Epstein was able to visit the White House for these public events as a regular citizen, but did not do so when Trump was president. Yeah. Prior to Epstein's, like, first conviction. Yeah. 2008. Yeah. Pat Fallon also tried to characterize a $20,000 donation to a joint campaign fund in the 90s as a donation to Hillary's presidential campaign fund. Many years later, he was called on this being obviously incorrect. Come on, man. That's so dumb. There was a lot of stuff like this, a lot of small errors. Some of them may not have been errors. Right. Some of them may have been ways to make the transcript read a certain way. Ye. If Hillary or the lawyers weren't able to catch something. But both Hillary and her team, but really mostly Hillary was really on it for this entire hearing. Like, very sharp. This was peak Hillary. I feel like a lot of people, you know, for a lot of the, like, analysis online, I saw, you know, a take over and over again that, that was like, why wasn't she like this when she ran for president? She was. This is, this is Hillary. She was. And it's, you know, it's impressive, but also a little bit unlikable. If you do that, if you do that, like all the time. Right. If you're, if you're like that all the. A little bit. Oh, okay. I'm gonna take a step back now. That's a lot. But, you know. Yeah, we'll have, we'll have more on her sort of like, intellectual sharpness later. I mean, she's fiercely intelligent. Yeah. Fiercely intelligent. And that is, that is, that is on display for the entirety of this deposition. But I really hated the take where people were like, if she was like this when she ran for president, maybe we wouldn't be dealing with Donald Trump now. It's like, no, you know, that's not what happened. No, this is who Hillary's been her entire adult life. Thank you. Hillary said that she never solicited funds for Jeffrey Epstein, never had funds solicited on her behalf, and never invited Epstein to any political fundraisers. When asked about her own speculation on her husband, previous investigators, or the mind state of Jeffrey Epstein and Glenn Maxwell, she could not answer because that is speculation on other people's opinions or mind states. About an hour in, Nancy Mace asked Hillary Clinton if she believes the Epstein files are, quote, unquote, a vast right wing conspiracy. I think if they are fully released as the Transparency act requires, that would be fulfilling the responsibility of the Justice Department. But it appears that there have been many issues with the full release. So I'm not going to characterize it other than to say, I think that's A well known fact. It is certainly an odd question to ask if the files themselves are a vast right wing conspiracy. And Hillary here just answered by talking about the issues that have come up with the full release of the Epstein files. Yeah. After this, Hillary is asked about whether Jeffrey Epstein was one of the most prolific sex traffickers in the world and how the State Department worked to counter international sex trafficking. Would you say he's one of the world's most prolific sex traffickers? I don't know what to compare it to. There are terrible sex trafficking rings all over the world. And you were, you said you were Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013, and you state your agency prioritized combating sex trafficking internationally, correct? That's correct. During your time as Secretary of State, did you or the State receive any intelligence Committee cables or briefings mentioning Epstein's foreign travel pedophile island or his network of pedophiles and sex trafficking? Not that I am aware of, no. How did you miss it? If he's, I believe, one of the most prolific sex traffickers in the world? You were Secretary of State. How did you miss it? Well, that would have been a matter of the Justice Department, not the State Department. But in your opening statement and your statements earlier. In your opening statement, you stated that Secretary Rubio should be called attention. Testify. You said that he has and the administration has, quote, abandoned survivors. Using the same logic. You were Secretary of State during a time period after Jeffrey Epstein was convicted of being a pedophile and soliciting children for sex. Why then did you, quote, using your own logic, abandoned survivors? What is the question, please? I followed her comment. First of all, we focused on whether there were laws that made sex trafficking, sexual slavery, domestic violence, other abuses of women on the books in countries. And then we tried to evaluate, were those laws being implemented and were judges appropriately trained and briefed about how to implement those laws. Were governments taking themselves seriously? We looked at the broad institutional approach to these very serious abuses. This is an interesting exchange to me. Yeah. So Mace here doesn't really understand the role of the Justice Department versus the State Department. Yes. How the Justice Department investigates crimes committed in the United States versus the State Department is this entity that pressures other countries to create or, you know, improve sex trafficking laws and doesn't really understand this difference. Right. And refers to a part in Hillary's opening statement about how Rubio shrunk a specific office to combat international sex trafficking. And she isn't quite able to, like to understand how Hillary is critiquing that while also saying that the Justice Department mishandled the Epstein investigation while she was Secretary of State. It's this interesting. Just break in, not really understanding how the government works. And this clip also shows, like, how sharp Hillary is being able to follow this line of questioning better than her own lawyers in some instances. Yes. Be able to actually, like, respond to what Mace is really asking. Notice that as well. Mace then continues to ask about how the US Government handled Jeffrey Epstein's first criminal case. And this is how Clinton responded. Would you say the US Government at that time, during this time period was appropriate with the way that it handled Epstein? I. I don't think that you could say that was true about any of the government's prosecutorial efforts, starting with the Southern District of Florida and Alex Acosta and all those who basically gave him a sweetheart deal. And then, I think going up the chain, there was very little attention paid that should have been paid. But we had laws on the books. They were not being implemented. But that was not within my purview. And because what we were looking at is what's the institutional structure? And can we do more to make sure countries take it seriously? Our country had laws on the books. So this man was not held to account. It was not in your purview when you were Secretary of State. Then why is it today in Secretary Rubio's purview? Because what's happened is that the office that was actually following what was going on around the world has been decimated. 70% of the staff is gone. It's impossible to carry out the functions of that office if you don't have a critical number of people. So my question would be to Secretary Rubio. Is there more that can be done out of time here? Wow. Yeah. Nancy Mace, you suck. You suck. Pretty clear articulation there from Secretary Clinton. Yeah. Um, I fear that, like, that Nancy Mace spent most of this time trying to set Hillary up. And I don't think she. I don't think she succeeded. No. Hillary was then asked if she was, quote, unquote, concerned when she saw photos of her husband getting a back massage or in a hot tub. And what went through her mind? Hillary refused to speculate on events in which she has no context for and was not there. We're going to go on a quick ad break now and then return to continue the discussion on the Clinton testimony. All right, we're back. I want to get a little bit into the background of this hearing some more. So when the Clintons finally agree to testify in February One of the things they pushed for was that the testimony take the form of public hearings broadcast live. Hillary addressed Chairman Comer online saying, quote, you love to talk about transparency. There's nothing more transparent than a public hearing. Cameras on, unquote. There was a brief back and forth negotiation on whether the depositions would be open to the public. Ultimately, they were not, but they were recorded on camera and transcribed for later release. Mm. Part of the terms for this private hearing, this deposition, were that press and photographers were not allowed inside the room and that deposition materials would only be released in full through official channels after sensitive information like staffer names present at the deposition and off the record exchanges between lawyers were properly removed or redacted. At about an hour and 20 minutes into Hillary's deposition, the Clinton staff learned that one of the Republican committee members leaked a photo of Hillary to right wing influencer Benny Johnson. Crazy. Who posted the picture and wrote, quote, breaking the first image of Hillary Clinton testifying under oath about Jeffrey Epstein to the Republican Oversight Committee. This is the first time Hillary has had to answer real questions about Epstein. Clinton does not look happy. Photo provided by Representative Lauren Bobbert, unquote. Honestly, there's actually nobody more unprofessional than Lauren Bobert will get into her unprofessional conduct later in this hearing as well. Great. But here's a clip of the Clinton team realizing that a photo has been leaked. I have another photos that are being released of the secretary as she is testifying from inside this room. Can you please advise me as to whether or not that's going to permissible and consistent with the rules, particularly given that we have asked for a public hearing if there are photos that are being released of the secretary, she is testifying. Can you please explain how that. I'm done with this. If you guys are doing that, I am done. You can hold me in contempt from now until the cows come home. This is just typical behavior. We will go off the record. Oh, for heaven. So I would like to understand how that's permissible. It doesn't matter. We all are abiding by the same rules. I. I will take that down. Yeah. Well, I would like to take a break at this moment. I'd like to have for now, fair go off the record. Pretty shocking stuff. There's no defense for that. That's. That's wild. And I would walk out as well. When they went back on the record, Chairman Comer discussed how he advised all members that no photos of the deposition were to be released and that an incident like this would not happen again. Lauren Barber later told reporters that she took the picture before a testimony actually began and that she checked with committee staff about using the photo. No follow up on that? Yeah, fat chance. It's embarrassing. After returning from off the Record, the minority, the Democrats asked about the Justice Department illegally withholding certain files related to the investigation from public disclosure. Hillary says that this behavior by the Justice Department deserves the most thorough investigation that Congress could carry out. This will be a longer clip, about two minutes, but there's some good information inside. I think from the very beginning, the behavior of the Attorney General and her staff has demonstrated either a gross incompetence, which is bothersome because they are the keepers of information that should be evaluated for law enforcement purposes, or a clear cover up because they are protecting the President and others. Either one of those should be the focus of this committee to try to get to the bottom. If they are incompetent and they are incapable of complying with the law that the Congress passed, we need to know that because they are falling down on the job, they have an FBI director who's more interested in drinking beer in a hockey dressing room after our team won the Olympics rather than being responsive and complying with the law as it has been promulgated. So I don't think it's unfair to say that given the sequencing of the events, starting with the way that President Trump made the release of the files a key element of his 2024 campaign, the promise that he and then his Attorney General made that the files would be released, then a walking back of that as they began to look at the files, an ignoring of what they had promised, including that they had a client list on the desk of the Attorney General. Reasonable people would have to assume they are engaged in a massive cover up, which is infuriating as an American, as a citizen, all of us should be, regardless of party, wondering, what are they hiding? Nothing says I watch sports more than calling it a hockey dressing room dressing room. I was like Hillary up with the times. Hillary goes on to mention how the prosecutor, the original Epstein case, Alex Acosta, was not asked any questions by Republicans during his Epstein deposition. About half an hour later, Hillary and the majority go into about a three minute exchange. I think this is between Hillary and Nancy Mace about Howard Lutnick, Trump's Commerce Secretary, who's frequently named in the files, whom Hillary knew from being a New York Senator during the 911 attacks, where Lutnick lost the highest number of employees out of anyone that day. I think over 600. So Hillary was asked how she knows Lutnick. Hillary tries to respond by saying how they met, which was the aftermath of 9 11. Mace claims that this is like a distraction from answering the question and that Hillary's trying to garner sympathy. Things get very heated over, over the course of these like three minutes as they like argue about, you know, if she's actually answering the question. Mace talks about being a survivor herself and now she's trying to, you know, get the truth out of these hearings. Hillary responds by talking about how she's been very sympathetic to Mace's situation and respects the work that she's doing in the Epstein hearings, but is trying to answer the question specifically about Lutnick. It's a pretty loud and contentious three minutes. About two minutes after that, Republicans made Hillary read emails from the Epstein files. Thank you for a fun night. Your littlest girl was a little naughty. How does that make you feel? Makes me sick. If you can also read the EFTA 00878421. This is also another email. Can you just please provide the context? It's an email to Jeffrey Epstein. If you could just read the context of what it is. Of course, the oh Jesus, Ohio, Jesus, I'm coming trick and the bot, just the main body of the context of email said that she felt God's presence next to her when she was in bed. She knows that Jesus watches over her and he helped save her life. Whoops. How does that make you feel? It's bizarre. I don't know what it means. The reason I asked you to read both of these is because these emails were both sent by co conspirators that were then given the plea deals and now have been given victim status. Both of these women were also named an FBI document and they're on a number of other emails. What does that have to do with Hillary? Yes, that's the exact thing that I wrote down. This has no relevance to Clinton at all. This, this doesn't relate to her. They wanted sound bites of her reading weird things. It's a humiliation ritual. Right? It's. Yeah, there's no reason for them to do this. That the majority just go on to ask Hillary if the DOJ should re evaluate the plea deals of these two people. Something that Hillary has no like expertise for. Like, that's what that she's here to testify on, on her own knowledge relating to Epstein and Maxwell. This is, this is a complete non sequitur. This doesn't relate to her in any way. It's just gross. You're just. You're just getting a woman to read the Epstein files for your own entertainment. Yes. It's disgusting. Yes. I have a few clips here. This is what, three. Three clips about her intellectual kind of ruthlessness and the ways that the questioners in this committee were trying to get certain answers out of her. And she was able to either correct them or navigate in. In an interesting way. I'll start with this first one at three and a half hours in. Gosh, you've watched a lot. In 2014, Epstein met with William Burns, who was then a senior State Department official and later a CIA director. Excuse me, could you say what year that was again? In 2014? In 2014, he met with William Burns. Epstein met with William Burns as the Secretary of State at that time. Were you aware of that meeting? I wasn't Secretary of state in 2014. Okay. Were you aware of the. Mr. Burns. Okay. Embarrassing stuff. Yeah. She. She was not Secretary of State in 2014. She served from 2009 to 2013. They're asking a question about if she was informed of something while Secretary of State in 2014. She simply was not there. She was not Secretary of State. The people in this committee should know this. They should know when she actually served as Secretary of State. It's embarrassing. They continue to get, like, dates wrong throughout this hearing. This. This guy who's asking this question is his representative, Eric Burlinson. He also mischaracterized Chelsea's wedding as Hillary's wedding, saying that Glenn Maxwell attended Hillary's wedding and that Glenn Maxwell vacationed with Chelsea after the wedding. This event that he's referencing, this vacation was actually a year before the wedding in 2009. Hillary and her lawyers had to correct all of that stuff. Specifically, Erica Berlinson did not seem to know what he was talking about at all in this hearing. Just constantly got little dates and facts wrong. That gives me pause for a number of reasons, but it just makes me think about, you know, if they were actually talking to somebody that they needed to deeply press. Yeah. That they would not get the results needed. It gives me a major pause that they have lack of confidence in this committee to do their jobs. But it's. It's just, frankly embarrassing that these are elected officials and they can't even get their dates right. Yeah. This is an extremely serious matter. And these are. These are the people doing oversight. This is not a laughing matter. Yeah. They are totally incompetent. Yeah. Lauren Barber then asked a very leading question about when Hillary learned her husband was spending time with a registered sex offender. Ms. Clinton, when did you first learn that your husband was spending time extensively with a registered sex offender? He did not. After he was. He was convicted years after Bill stopped having any. Were there any activities that raised any red flags to think that he could be charged of sex crimes during the time? Are you asking if she has awareness. Yes. Of Jeffrey Epstein, of any red flags being brought to your awareness, to your family's awareness while your husband was spending time with Jeffrey Epstein? Epstein? I, I have no recollection of anyone bringing any red flags to me. They continued to ask about her husband and she just have to. She just had to keep reiterating it like, the committee will have a chance to question her husband tomorrow. Like they can. They can ask him about his relationship with this Epstein tomorrow. There's no use in her speculating about her husband's relationship. They can just ask him literally in less than 24 hours. But they just kept. They just kept going. Classic. You know, one of the more bizarre moments, they quoted Epstein referring to Hillary being prettier in person. And this exchange is interesting because of the way it suggests the committee's interpretation of certain statements made by Epstein. When I think they probably infer something to the opposite. It's bizarre, just like weird misogyny going on. So regarding the Epstein files, there are many files where Jeffrey Epstein seems to speak as though he does know you personally. In one file, EFTA 00657115, Mr. Epstein is commenting and he quotes, hey, Hillary Clinton is much prettier in person. This was Tuesday, September 20, 2011. And then another Congressman. I'm not going to object to that. Congressman, can we see the documents? Because we don't think. We don't think the document. Not that you're not pretty. Jeffrey Epstein is all. Also commented that meetings with Hillary are not easily discreet. Has he ever connected someone to meet with you? Not that I'm aware of. Okay. That was my first time seeing that clip. That's so funny. First of all, very funny. Second of all, this is not what this is supposed to be. Why are you bringing that up? What does that have to do with anything? Yeah, I mean, they're trying to establish some sort of relationship between Hillary and Epstein, clearly, but it doesn't exist. And to me, these exchanges just infer that, you know, Jeffrey Epstein had seen Hillary in person before, likely at these White House Historical association events where she sees, you know, hundreds of people who, like, walk by. Right. But then Epstein himself, like, expressed that it's actually difficult to get a private meeting with her. So this. This doesn't prove that they had any actual, like, personal knowledge of each other, like, mutually. Obviously, Epstein knew who she was. She was the first lady of the United States. Absolutely ridiculous. About 10 minutes later, and this is getting to the end of this hearing about, like, you know, four hours in, Hillary just kind of goes off a little bit after just being asked the same question again and again and again, and then also demonstrates, like, how much she actually knows about this committee's investigation. You have said that you have never been to Mr. Epstein's island. Is that correct? You know what? I am so tired of answering that question. If you have one scintilla of evidence to the contrary, put it forward. I have never been on his island, period. I've never been in his homes, his offices, his anything. I don't know how many times you have to say the same thing over and over and over again. And I just am struggling with the relevance of all of this, but, no, I never have been. And based off that response, that would include you've never been to Mr. Epstein's Manhattan townhome? I have not. His New Mexico ranch? No, I have not. His Palm beach residence? No, I have not. Is Paris a department? Didn't know he had one. Haven't been there. You know, I also find it very interesting because I went back and looked at the transcripts of all of your other depositions, and none of the Republicans asked a single question to any witness about Jeffrey Epstein or any question that would help provide answers for his victims. Hillary goes on to say that Republican Chairman Comer did ask Attorney General Barr not about Epstein, but if he was aware of Clinton involvement in the 2016 Russia collusion investigation, again, in a deposition about the DOJ's handling of the Epstein files. Completely irrelevant. Completely relevant to the. To the matter at hand. And if these people want to pretend that they actually take, you know, what happened to these victims seriously, then they would have a focused, focused effort on the actual subject, not all these wild partisan threads. And I'm now going to discuss before. Before we. Before we go on break again, about how this hearing kind of throughout it, but I've condensed this down into one section, turned towards the weird multiple times in ways that are sometimes, you know, relevant, but oftentimes not. Earlier in this hearing, Hillary stated that she had never been briefed on whether Jeffrey Epstein had foreign intelligence ties while serving in office. But that speculation that Jeffrey Epstein could have been a foreign intel asset is a, quote, unquote, fruitful area of investigation, although she was not made aware of any connection of this sort while Secretary of State. She was also asked about a passport belonging to Epstein which bore a different name. This is actually a passport that was given. The individual's name is Marcus Robert Fort Nelli. Do you think that this is a sign or a telltale sign of intelligence operations and pseudonyms? I can't speculate. I don't know. Okay. Victims have stated to this committee, both Democrats and Republicans, that during Epstein's time during his day camp jail is what I'll call it, that he was also in active communication with Bush's CIA director. They also had stated that he had active ties to Russia, Israel and Iran. Given your status not just as a First lady, but also in your secretary position, have you ever been targeted by any of these countries as a means of a foreign intelligence gathering operation? Are you aware of potential vulnerabilities? Yeah, I was targeted by Russia in the 2016 campaign. I mean, I think that's pretty well known. What about Israel or Iran? I don't know about either Israel or Iran. Okay. Do you believe that Epstein was running potentially a honeypot operation with intelligence gathering operations to collect information on high profile individuals, both Democrat and Republican, the United States, in an effort to sway our foreign policy? So is it possible? I have no direct knowledge, but I think it's one of the areas your committee should investigate. Do you think it's possible? Well, it's certainly possible. It's a tried and true technique of certain intelligence agencies. Do you believe that he was using honey pots in effort to. I can't speculate. I don't know. This is such a weird use of their time. Later she said that she had no reason to believe that personally she was the subject of an intel gathering operation relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Glenn Maxwell. And then right after she was asked if she was ever denied access to information about UAPs, that's unidentified aerial phenomenon. Hillary said that she was never denied access because she never asked for access. And when questioned, she said that she believes the American public deserves access to such topics subject to national security implications. This bizarre off topic line of questioning continued nearly an hour later into the hearing. So I'm going to begin with some lighthearted different questions and you're welcome to ignore them or if you want to, but while I have you here, I just have to ask. So when you're. When your husband was president, it was Lawrence Rockefeller had an effort to try to disclose UFOs, UAPs, when you were running for President, John Podesta publicly stated that you would disclose these files if given the chance, if you had been President. Are you pleased to see that these files may be disclosed finally? I am pleased. As I say, I think they have to be carefully scrutinized so that no national security information is disclosed. But this is an issue of real importance to so many people and I think whatever can be disclosed should be disclosed. Was there a program that specifically that. That was referencing that you were aware of? I was not. As you mentioned, John Podesta, who was one of my advisors, was deeply interested in the issue. And if I had been elected, I certainly would have listened to his advice. Thank you for indulgence on that. Very odd, completely off topic, no relevance to the actual subject of inquiry. A few minutes later, Hillary asked a clarifying question about why UFOs were brought up. This is sort of like off subject, but didn't you all require in the latest defense authorization that the UFO information has to be. What? They ripped it out? They killed it. Oh, I thought that had gone through. That was my amendment and it got ripped out. Oh, okay. Well, you've just. I didn't know that, so thank you for enlightening me. Okay. Yeah. They've been killing us. So if alien disclosure questions weren't bad enough and, you know, disrespectful to victims of Epstein and sex trafficking, it did get worse. Yeah, it did. And we will get into the worse after this ad break. All right, we're back. At nearly the four hour mark into Hillary Clinton's deposition, Lauren Bobert started asking about conspiracy theories. In past public statements, as in 2017 speeches and interviews, you described Pizza Gate as a baseless conspiracy theory alleging you and others ran a child sex trafficking ring from a Washington pizzeria. Pizzeria basement. Have you reviewed any 2025, 2026 Epstein files that were released that you believe reference or relate to those specific 2016 claims regarding the Podesta emails? Comet Ping pong pizza used as code? Possibly. I'm sorry, you're asking her about whether she's reviewed emails in the Epstein files which relate to the wacky Pizzagate? You could characterize it however you want. I just would like to know if she's familiar with any of them, so. Excuse me, your question is about whether or not she has reviewed any emails in the Epstein release files about Pizzagate? Correct. Pizzagate was totally made up. It was an outrageous allegation that ended up hurting a number of people that caused a deranged young man to show up with his assault rifle. And shoot up a local pizzeria. I can't believe you're even referencing it. You should be there. There are connections to the. The language. Well, the QAnon people believe there are, so I don't know what people believe. Have at it. Completely unhitched. Why are we doing this? I have complete lack of faith in this committee. This is offensive to survivors of Epstein. And this is getting us no relevant information to the Epstein probe, as they call it. This is ridiculous. This is inflammatory. I mean, I expect nothing less from lo and behold. But, you know, it's just. It's insane and embarrassing. It's insane. And like, there has been a resurgence of, you know, Pizzagate related conspiracy theories. People talking about Pizzagate since the files have been released. Since people can create their own patterns, right, by selectively honing in on words or symbols which allow them to overlook what's right in front of their nose. Right. All of the very clear connections laid out in the Epstein files, those can be ignored. Yes. And instead you focus on these, like, coded messages hidden everywhere, hidden in the backgrounds of videos. You know, people carrying pizza boxes into the Clinton deposition. All this kind of stuff. And it, It's. It allows them to. To miss the very. The very clear things that are actually outlined in the files. It is, you know, one of the negative side effects of, you know, of files like this being released is that it allows a lot of, you know, points of interest to be honed in on by people charting wildly conspiratorial matrices. I just don't even know how somebody like Lauren Bobbert's on a committee like this or an elected official or, you know, employed, frankly. Hillary went on to say, I expected a lot of interesting questions today, but Pizzagate was not on the list. Lauren Bobbert replied, that's okay. We're asking all sorts of things here. Okay. A few minutes later, Bobert returned with even more Pizzagate questions. And things escalated to the point where they had to go off the record. Good lord. Are you aware of any files that were on Anthony Weiner's laptop In a folder that was titled in insurance, life insurance, with a zip file titled fraud. Chairman's ruling. This is way out. Is this within the scope? Mr. Chairman? The chairman rules that it's not. When the scope. Mr. Chairman, based on what you said in the public hearing, Is this within the scope? We can go off the record for a moment, Mr. Chairman. Is this within the scope? So you couldn't quite make out what Bobbert was referencing there. She was talking about the frazzle Drip conspiracy theory that alleged Anthony Weiner possessed a video of Hillary Clinton conducting a satanic ritual murder of a child, cutting off this child's face to wear as a mask to fill the child's blood with adrenochrome to be harvested. This is like a 20, a 2018 conspiracy theory. One of. One of the more like, like graphic and gross aspects of QAnon. And here Robert is just openly asking Hillary Clinton about Frazzle Drip by name. Completely inappropriate. Has no bearing on the investigation. It's an insult to actual victims of child sex trafficking. So this whole conspiratorial angle of the Hillary Clinton deposition made up a significant chunk. Another chunk that made up a significant portion of time is just Clinton kind of advising and the committee members, both on the Republican and Democrat side, like, asking for her advice on how to conduct their own investigation. She advised that they should follow Senator Wyden's compiled Treasury data on Epstein's financial transactions and that that data should be subpoenaed from the Treasury Department. She was asked about how they could determine if Jeffrey Epstein was a spy. Hillary advised them to send document requests to subpoena the CIA, the Department of National Intelligence, counterintelligence departments in the doj, saying to, quote, unquote, cast a wide net. She suggested cooperating with UK investigations into former Prince Andrew and trying to see if Israel will cooperate in sharing information regarding the investigation. Finally, Hillary suggested to Chairman James Comer that he should advise on how laws could be changed to prevent future abuse based on the committee's knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's manipulation techniques and mode of operation. But there was, like, significant chunk of at least, like, you know, 30 minutes where she was essentially being asked or advising the committee on how to do their own job, just due to the sheer incompetence that has been displayed and the clips that I've selected here. Wow. I don't really have anything else to say besides that. It's just, like, pathetic. Yeah. I mean, and most of the interesting stuff is in the Hillary, Hillary Clinton one. Yeah. A bill was deposed the next day, but for some of the, like, logistics regarding this hearing, a source told the New York Post. So take that as you will. Sure. That the Clinton team demanded specific, quote, unquote, beauty, lighting and camera positions relatable, I fear, to get the most flattering angle of Hillary's face and brought white tablecloths to bounce the overhead lighting onto the bottom of her face to minimize shadows. Yeah. Pictures of the whole room also showed that the Clinton team was the only ones with these, like, nice orange upholstered chairs. The rest of the chairs were just like regular black folding chairs. The New York Post contains this little tidbit that the customized blue paneled backdrop was developed by a local specialized vendor within about seven hours after Clinton's team concluded it did not like the vibe of the original black curtains in the background, unquote. So they, like, went in, saw this, you know, white table with, with, with black curtains. They thought it looked too much like a criminal interrogation or, or like a quote, unquote, hostage situation is what's happening quoted in the Post article, as opposed to like an official congressional deposition, you know, like an official government venue. So they got like a local carpenter to make this blue paneled backdrop in like, a few hours to put behind Hillary. And that's just an interesting insight into, like, the thought process of, of the Clinton team regarding the optics of this hearing shop local. So let's, let's briefly go through some of the sections on, on Bill. Bill started by saying that they should not have questioned Hillary, quote, but I do think you should be talking to me. You should have called me. I did take those plane trips with him. You have a right to ask those questions, unquote. He said that, quote, I'll be honest with you. I'll be 88 years old if I lived my next birthday. I don't remember everything that happened 24 years ago, but I do remember some things. And I'll tell you what I remember the best that I can, unquote. When asked when he first met Jeffrey Epstein, Bill referred to a photo of him shaking Epstein's hand in 1993 at a White House Historical association event. But Bill said that he doesn't remember that. But this photo does exist. He shook a lot of people's hands, does not remember everyone he meets. He first remembers meeting Jeffrey Epstein for a Clinton foundation plane trip in 2002. He said he was connected with Epstein through someone named Larry Summers, who told Bill that Jeffrey Epstein made a large donation, about $10 million to Brain Research and was a, quote, unquote, information hungry person. Summers said that Epstein wanted to talk with Bill about economics and politics and offered to take Bill, his staff, and his Secret Service detail on Clinton foundation trips for global humanitarian aid. So Bill saw this as a way to drive the price down for these trips. He took the last one of these flights in 2003. When asked why this relationship ended, Bill said that the AIDS program, it was a humanitarian aid program to help with aids, but that this AIDS program, you know, Took off, and more people that Bill knew better offered to help. And Jeffrey did not seem as interested in the AIDS program, so they kind of just naturally drifted apart. Bill characterized the relationship as friendly, but didn't know him well enough to be considered a friend. And so that he never talked about, witness, or participated in anything sexual relating to Jeffrey Epstein and young women and girls. Bill said he learned of Epstein's crimes in 2008. Bill said he had no indication Epstein was trafficking women. Quote, there's nothing that I saw when I was around him that made me realize he was trafficking women, unquote. Bill is asked about if he communicated with a long list of people regarding Epstein. This was kind of a weirdly framed question. It was like, have you communicated with any of these people about Jeffrey Epstein? Bill had a hard time kind of understanding the nature of this question. It is kind of oddly phrased. Hillary was asked the same one. Yeah, they just read a list of names. Bill recounted if he knew the person or not. And lawyers had to specify, like, oh, no, they're asking if you communicated with them about Epstein, not. Not if you knew them. So it kind of got some confusing responses. Okay. Interestingly, both Hillary and Bill laughed at the mention of Noam Chomsky. Bill said that he never communicated with Chomsky, and that Chomsky, quote, wasn't a big fan of mine. He thought I was too conservative. Fuck off, gnome. Fuck off, gnome. It's crazy. Bill did testify that he thought that someone relating to law enforcement would ask him about Epstein in 2008, when the news about Epstein's crimes came out. Considering that Epstein let Bill use the plane, but no one ever did. He said he never suspected Intel Agency connections with Epstein and was at the time unaware of Epstein's visits to the White House while Bill was president and has only since been informed of this in preparation for this testimony. Okay. Bill was asked about a New York Times article claiming to expound on Bill and Epstein's relationship in the 90s, characterized as chummy, which Bill denies. He said that he didn't even know Epstein really during this time, even though they may have been at the same events. He was asked about being asked to write a personal note to Jeffrey Epstein's mother. Bill said that he never met Jeffrey Epstein's mother and that he wrote a lot of notes to a lot of people that he did not know. He was unsure of who asked him to write this note. He was also asked about this passport appearing to belong to Epstein bearing a different name, with the questioner asserting that they believe Jeffrey Epstein was an intelligence operative running a honey pot against the President. When later asked if he believes that he was targeted, Bill says that it's possible. The lawyers object to this based on speculation, but Bill says he doesn't know if he was targeted, but would be surprised. Refers to Jeffrey Epstein as a, quote, unquote, vacuum cleaner of information, but was not overtly manipulative early on, saying that Epstein mostly asked about derivatives trading and stock market regulation. Bill was asked if he ever had contact with someone named Shantae Davies, who was a, quote, unquote, flight attendant on Epstein's plane. Bill confirms that he did and confirmed that a neck rub took place once with Shantae Davies, but denied he ever went to the island. I don't know something about neck rub and Bill Clinton just makes my stomach hurt. Yeah. He later says that he was unaware of the abuse happening to Shantae Davies and says that he, quote, wish Shantae had told me I liked her, but said that he did not think there was anything unusual. He said that massages on rich people's planes and boats weren't uncommon. Was never aware of anyone under the age of 18 on these flights. And if there were, that would have made him uncomfortable. He specified that Secret Service was with him for every single trip. He, quote, never signed off Secret Service protection. He talked about specifically this. This neck rub incident, saying that he had a sore neck during one of the legs of these Clinton foundation aid trips and received a massage this one time. That's what he claimed. He was asked about the note in Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday book. Bill said that his own staff asked him to write a letter for the book specifying that he sends out hundreds of birthday letters every year to friends or people he's only met a few times. A regular occurrence. He's asked to read a section of the letter that people had a hard time transcribing. Exactly. Which makes a reference to Epstein having made errors in his life. And he was asked whether this errors referred to sex crimes. Bill said no. In the life of someone 50 years old, they're going to make mistakes. It was a throwaway line in one section of this very short letter. I don't think it's super relevant now around this time when they're reading from this letter is where there's this viral clip of Bill pulling back a copy of a photo from his lawyers, like, while smiling. This is circulated a lot. It looks like he's no, like, recounting like good memories or Something. The piece of paper he's pulling back is actually just a copy of a New York Times article. It's not a picture of him and Epstein. It's not a picture of memories. There may be a small photo framed in the picture included in this New York Times article that's being passed around, but it's not like he's, like, flipping through, like, a yearbook of, like, good moments with friends and, like, you know, happily recounting. I think this. This little clip's been decontextualized. I agree. I'm not. Not trying to defend Bill Clinton here. No. But I was actually happening in this hearing, and his lawyers are passing around a copy of a New York Times article which he's being questioned about, and that's the context for that clip. And, like, this clip went pretty viral. And so I was talking about it actually with my mom. My mom. My mom's first reaction held some weight with me. She was like, that's just Bill Clinton's face. He's kind of this happy, goofy guy. Like, he's generally like a smiley guy. And, you know, I think that makes sense contextually here. Again, not defending Bill Clinton, but, yeah, I do want to play one clip about Trump. Bill was asked if the committee should talk to Donald Trump, since it's a name appears more frequently in the files than almost any other person. Bill says that's up to the committee and mentions an instance where he talked with Trump about Epstein on a golf course for a charity tournament around 2002-2003. And they talked about Epstein because Trump somehow knew that Bill had flown on the plane. But besides this incident, he had no other conversations with Trump about Epstein or Maxwell. The day I was there, he would. Typically, Donald Trump would come out and play a few holes with us, and he somehow knew I had flown in Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft. And he said, you know, we had some great times together over the years, but we fell out, all because of a real estate deal. And he said, I'm sorry it happened. That's all. Do you recall whether President Trump was the first one to affirmatively bring up the subject of Jeffrey Epstein? No, but I'd be shocked if I did. I just don't do that. Do you recall whether President Trump elaborated at all on the great times that he had with Jeffrey Epstein? No, and I took. At the time, I took. No, I didn't put any, you know, sexual stint on it. And as far as you recall, President Trump characterized the nature of the ending of their friendship as being solely due to the real estate. What he said. Interestingly here Bill recounts that Trump's reason for breaking with Epstein was due to a real estate deal, not the poaching of employees at Mar a Lago as alternatively reported. Right. The minority. The Democrats referred to statements from three Jeffrey Epstein victims. In statements including Bill in some way starting with someone named Maria Farmer, an Epstein employee who first reported abuse the NYPD and FBI in 1996. She claimed that she had knowledge that Bill visited Epstein's house multiple times. Bill denies this. Someone named Virginia Roberts Duffe remarked that she had knowledge that Bill was at Epstein's island. Bill responded by saying that ultimately this person, quote, unquote, reached a different conclusion and denied a claim that he flew in a helicopter with Glenn Maxwell to the island. The committee member reference a diary entry as the piece of information asserting that Bill was on the island. Bill's lawyers asked about the dates for this entry so they could determine whether Bill was in a different part of the world around this time. But this gets moved on pretty quick. They briefly bring up this picture of Bill in a hot tub in Brunei. He says that he was staying at a hotel during one of these AIDS trips and briefly went to a hot tub. Other people were present from this trip. Secret Service. He was asked about a bizarre painting of Bill Clinton wearing Monica Lewinsky's blue dress found in Jeffrey Epstein's apartment. Bill said he'd never seen it before, was asked to speculate why this painting was made. Lawyers said that the committee can ask the artist. Lauren Bobbert goes on a very poor line of questioning regarding a conversation transcript between two people. And this line of questioning requires deposition to go off the record to figure out what exactly she's talking about. Bill eventually responds to a question stating that he never felt that he owed Jeffrey Epstein any favors and never participated in any quote, unquote, island orgies since he never traveled to the U.S. virgin Islands with Jeffrey Epstein. About two hours in, Bill Clinton is asked if he thinks Jeffrey Epstein killed himself, something they never asked. Hillary, I would just like to ask you personally and directly, do you believe that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself? Are you asking him to speculate on how Mr. Epstein died? I am asking what the President thinks. So you're asking his opinion? Mr. President, was your. Was your friend Jeffrey Epstein suicide? Are you classifying him as a friend? Who he has testified that he was friendly friend. In a letter he said he was friendly, but not. You've asked for his testimony. President, do you believe that Jeffrey Epstein was suicidal? Do you know Was he Ever suicidal? I don't know. I only know what the medical finding was. I think maybe he finally got caught and I don't know. I think I've accepted it in my own mind. I don't know what happened. Mr. President, what did you accept? That he killed himself or that he did? Not that he did, but I don't know. Yes, sir. Thank you. We don't, none of us know. We weren't there. Mr. President, it's been an honor. Thank you. Thank you. Why would you ask him that? That makes no sense. I mean, again, this is Lauren Bobber, the same person asking about Pizzagate. He's. She's trying to. Yeah. Dunk in as many of these conspiracy theory questions as she can because that's, that's like who she is. Right? She is, she, she is a conspiracy theorist herself. She may not characterize it that way, but she's trying to, you know, go. Go off a checklist of like, epic owns against the evil child eating Clintons. A few other few other small notes that I think are interesting. Bill was asked about emails being sent to Ghislaine Maxwell by one of his assistants. And Bill says that he never sent these emails and he's only ever sent two emails in his life, which I do believe I can too. It's so crazy. Oh, Bill. Wow. Bill was asked about a statement that Epstein made saying that Bill, quote, unquote, likes them young. Bill's lawyers ask, you know, if Bill's being asked to speculate on Jeffrey Epstein's mind. Bill says that this isn't true, that he quote, unquote likes them young and never went to the island again. Mace later asks if it's unusual for a quote, unquote sitting president to receive a massage. Bill's lawyers had to argue back and forth because Bill was not a sitting president during the time where this neck massage incident occurred. Bill's once again asked if he was the target of an intel operation. He says, I doubt it. There was then an extended argument between Mace and lawyers in reference to Daily Beast reporting on a statement Bill made after Jeffrey Epstein's 2019 arrest, mischaracterizing two instances where Jeffrey Epstein visited the Clinton office and Bill once visited Jeffrey Epstein's New York apartment, which he later remarked Jeffrey Epstein was not even present for. And Nancy Mace kept asking if Bill lied about only meeting Jeffrey Epstein at these two times based on the phrasing of the Daily Beast article. But the full statement that the Daily Beast was quoting from also lists the four plane trips which contained a total of 17 stops. The Beast article just mischaracterized this as only being two incidents. And Mace was referring to the article, not the actual original statement. This resulted in a pretty extensive argument. This leads us to the final clip that I'll play, which I think is kind of the only interesting question across the nine hours of testimony. The only question I think is actually kind of interesting and worthwhile, and it's not actually followed up on in any substantial way. Nancy Mace asks why the Clintons still associated with Glenn Maxwell after Jeffrey Epstein's first conviction, knowing that Maxwell was one of Epstein's closest associates. First of all, When the wedding occurred, She was with Ted White, and she was for several more years. We did not know when Epstein was arrested that she was still involved with him. I think that clears a lot of this up. We didn't know. And I don't want all of you to get. We're all getting in a ladder. There's a logical explanation. We didn't know. And I'm sorry for what she did and what she allowed her life to become. And now she's living with it. They do not follow up on this at all. The fact that the Clintons, knowing that Maxwell was like Epstein's number two guy, spent a decent amount of time with. On these four plane trips in 2002-2003, on these humanitarian aid, Clinton foundation trips, you know, a lot of time with Ghislaine and Epstein. The committee did not follow up on why. They continued to associate, even loosely, like, very loosely, with Ghislaine after the 2008 conviction. Yeah, that's a pretty reasonable question to have. And it just doesn't even get focused on very much. Instead, they start talking about this report from an Epstein victim about Bill Clinton allegedly walking into the offices of Vanity Fair and threatening them to not write sex trafficking articles about Jeffrey Epstein. Something that Bill obviously denies. And there would be other witnesses for this event, but like this. This question about the Clintons extended relationship with Glenn Maxwell after the first conviction is one of, like, the very last questions asked. It takes them nine hours to get there. Yeah. They don't even follow up on it. And it just kind of ends very, very flaccid. I'm sorry. To the survivors, like you're not getting any kind of justice. This committee is incompetent, embarrassing, and repugnant. Yeah. And that kind of sums up the hearing. All of the hearings, they were incompetent, embarrassing, and repugnant. Mm. Really spending more time on. On weird conspiracy theories than asking like new questions on Pizzagate. Yeah, because like they asked Hillary and Bill basically the same two questions over and over again, getting the same answers, wasting hours and hours of time. The only new questions they asked are these insane conspiracy ones. It's, it's embarrassing. It does not hold any relevance to the investigation. And it's nine hours of my life I'll never get back. Yep. Well, that does it for us here at. It could happen here. We'll keep following some of these, some of these hearings and depositions as this continues. I know there was new FBI documents about witness statements regarding President Trump released as I was writing this, like last night. We'll probably be talking about those in Executive disorder and later on throughout our coverage. Bye bye. No one knows what the future holds, but you deserve a Weather App that can help Weatherbug is easy to use and provides forecasts for your every need from storm warnings to pollen levels right at your fingertips. Get the fastest local Alerts and comprehensive 10 day forecasts wherever you are. It's hyper local real time customizable alerts. Make sure the weather never takes you by surprise so you can plan every day with confidence. Download the free Weatherbug app from the App Store today and start getting accurate weather forecasts 24 7. Did you know you can get your prep for free? Prep is a once daily peel that's up to 99% effective at preventing the transmission of HIV. Mistra makes it easy and free to get started all online, no doctor's office and no paperwork. They also provide free Doxy Pep, a simple antibiotic you take after sex to help prevent certain STIs. Kind of like morning after pill for STIs. Whether you have insurance or not, mistr's got you covered in three easy steps. 1. Sign up@mistr.com 2. Consult with a licensed doctor online and 3 complete your at home testing kit. Then your medication is delivered discreetly right to your door. It's safe, easy and completely judgment free. Protect yourself and protect each other. Sign up@mistr.com today when your schedule sounds like this. Are you kidding me? An oil change is the less best thing you have time for. So drive into Take five and let our techs change your oil, check your tires, top off your fluids and have you back on the road pit stop fast all while you stay in your car. No putting your entire schedule on hold. No upsells, no problem. So you can get back to your to do list or not. Find your nearest shop@take5.com Take 5 the Stay in your car. 10 minute oil change support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like etc ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member finra NSIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors llc. SEC Registered Advisor. Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures available at public.com disclosures. Welcome to It Could Happen Here, a podcast where the economy is falling apart in new and exciting ways faster than I can write about it. I am your host, Mia Wong. Welcome to what has Turned into a kind of Emergency Is the Economy Collapsing Episode. This episode was originally supposed to be about tariffs, but while I was writing the tariff episodes, a bunch of shit happens. Like we invaded Iran and kospi, which is the leading Korean stock market index, had its largest single drop in its entire history, which triggered its circuit breaker. Circuit breakers are a thing that stock markets have now where if the stock market collapses, like if it loses points too fast in a certain period of time, all trading will automatically stop for a bit. So it hits its circuit breaker, the tie index also hits its circuit breaker. And then in the wee hours of sort of Monday morning American time, I start seeing a bunch of people posting that COSPI hit the circuit breaker. And I'm very confused because that happened on like Wednesday, right? Like this already happened. No, no, no, no. Wrong, wrong. Happens again. It's two circuit breakers in like four sessions. So this has turned into an unbelievable crisis. Yeah, so we're going to get the tariff episode at some point, talking about the Supreme Court tariff rulings and stuff like that. That will happen. There's a lot of interesting stuff there. But right now we need to answer the question is the economy about to collapse? And tentatively, it has been held off at least for a little bit bit. Now, this is being recorded early Monday afternoon on March 9th. By the time this goes out on March 10th, who the fuck knows what will have happened? But let's talk about what happens in the run up to all of this, because it's very important. So in the lead up to the open of the American markets, we had a massive spike in oil futures. Like one of the largest single day spikes in oil futures ever. It looks like it's going to be the apocalypse for the markets. And the reason it looks like this is because, and this is something that's genuinely astounding. So one fifth of the world's oil moves through the Strait of Hormuz. We're going to talk about this in more detail later. And obviously there is now a war, which means that you can't move oil through it. And people suddenly realized that, oh, my God, this is going to raise oil prices. Now, when I was originally writing this episode in the Halcyon Days of Friday of last week, part of this episode was about why oil prices were not spiking because they didn't spike immediately upon the start of the war, right? And I was very confused about this because the explanation at the time was that people were like, oh, it'll be fine. The US Navy can escort oil tankers through the stratochromeuse. No, they can't. Like, the narrowest part of it's 23 miles wide. Like, what are we doing here? Like, forget drones. You can hit these oil tankers with like a fucking trebuchet. What are we doing here? What was the administration telling the oil companies? Right? And then a few days later, everyone collectively realized, oh, my God, we can't move oil. And yeah, no shit, you can't move oil. Jesus Christ. Like, this is unbelievable stuff from the people who are in the oil markets, from the oil executives, from the Gulf monarchies, from all of the people planning this. Why would you think this wouldn't happen? And we're going to get into that actually in a little bit because there is apparently a reason why they thought this was going to happen, which is some combination of just pure lies and willful belief and some of the worst strategic planning I've ever seen in my entire life. But, you know, the ability to close the Strait of Hormuz is the reason why, even if you are like President Donald Trump, the kind of person who doesn't give a shit if, you know, your army burns Iranian Children to death, right? Even if you don't care that you fucking bombed a fucking school, you don't fight this war because it fucks with the money. Now, in anticipation of what looked like it was going to be just a market pounding, Trump gave a phone interview with CBS's senior White House correspondent, Weijia Jiang, who posted this on Twitter. This is her reporting of his statements. This is from Donald Trump, quote, I think the war is very complete, pretty much. They have no navy, no communication, they've got no air force. He added that the US Is, quote, very far ahead of his initial three to four week time frame. You know, he also said that ships are moving through it now, but he's also, quote, thinking about taking it over, which, what, just officially conquering the Strait of Hormuz instead of merely like protecting it with American fleet assets. This is completely unhinged. And then he also said, quote, they've shot everything they have to shoot and they better not try anything cute or it's going to be the end of that country now. Okay, so the part of this, right, that went to the markets is that he thinks the war is over now. The part of it where he says if Iran fights back in any way, quote, it's going to be the end of that country, apparently did not hit the markets. The people running the markets are really, really dumb. They think and act like herd animals. This is, I guess, slightly an insult to herd animals because herd animals react that way for a reason. These people are human beings. They have the capacity for logic and reason. They have the same capacity for logic and reason that we do. And they still act like this. But this has calmed the markets down and it's sent oil prices back down again. We're going to get into why that's kind of nonsense in a little bit. But it's also worth noting in terms of Trump saying the war is nearly over, that every single other quote Trump has said about this war has been, he's in this for the long haul. He's thinking about troops on the ground. He is not going to get bored with it. He doesn't care that gas prices are going up. Someone asked his press secretary about whether he's ruled out the draft and she said, no, he hadn't. Which is, I mean, like, they're not going to do a draft. But, like, that's ridiculous. Why would you say that? It's also worth noting that, so he has a 250 year anniversary commission thing that he set up that he's very, very excited about. That's like it's America's 250 year, blah, blah, blah. And that commission's like one of their big people was ringing the opening bell on Wall street this morning. So, you know, I suspect that there's a lot of sort of motivated reasoning here going on with Trump saying, oh, that's fine, it's going to be fine. The war is nearly over. Do, do, do, do, do. Okay, So I quite frankly do not believe the President when he says that the war is nearly over. I mean, I guess maybe there's a scenario where everything we're about to talk about causes a crisis that is large enough to, you know, actually set off Trump pulling out of the war under pressure from his allies in the region, which is to say the Arab monarchies. I don't know to what extent that's actually going to happen. But let's talk about what the crisis here is. So the US's war against Iran has triggered what could be the start of a full on energy crisis. The energy crisis has been postponed for one day I guess as of again. Time of recording Monday, March 9th. But this could be the start of a full on energy crisis. And it's not just me saying this. Here is the subtitle of the Wall Street Journal's big piece on this quote, traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has ground to a virtual halt, unleashing the most severe energy crisis since the 1970s and threatening the global economy. So that's not good. Now I began this episode talking about a collapse on South Korean and Thai markets. And I should also mention, by the way, that like when that collapse happened, all the other Asian markets kind of ate shit. The Chinese markets were sort of more stable for reasons we'll get to in a second. But like Japan, like the Nikkei was down like 4%. Like all of the other Asian markets kind of ate shit. Right? Taiwanese market. And the reason for that is, well again, as I said above, one fifth of the world's oil supply, crude oil, is shipped through the Strait of Hormuz. And this is an issue for a country like South Korea, which imports almost all of its oil, you know, and whose economy, like manufacturing economy in particular is very, very heavily dependent on oil. This is true of a lot of other countries in that region. And South Korea and Thailand and Taiwan, Japan are not countries like China which have watch oil stockpiles and have the ability to get oil through other ways. Now I want to take a second to actually explain what the Strait of Hormuz is. So the Strait of Hormuz is a strait. It's like, there's a little bit of water, but it's close to land. I talked to Set earlier that the narrowest part of it is 23 miles. So it's very narrow. And it is a passage between the Persian Gulf and effectively the Indian Ocean. Right? And once you're out into the Indian Ocean, you can get to the rest of the world that is, you know, east of that, which is all of Asia. Most of the rest of the world that's not west of you right now, which is bordering the Persian Gulf. Who are in the area who need to ship their oil out through here include Iran, Iraq, Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE and Saudi Arabia. Those are a bunch of oil producing countries. You know, they are now also countries that are embroiled in this war because they are part of the American alliance. And you can ask the very reasonable question, okay, so if you're part of the American alliance, why the fuck would you be like, okay with the United States launching this attack on Iran? On a more vulgar level, you can ask the question, how the fuck was this allowed to happen? This is the money. This is the global economy that you are fucking with right now. One of the things that the Wall Street Journal talks about is that officials in the US And Israel told the Gulf states that there wouldn't be retaliation by Iran. Right? That Iran wouldn't target oil facilities, they would just target American military bases. They had a whole thing about how, oh, well, during the war with Israel, they only target American military bases. They didn't like, bomb any of the oil infrastructure. They were sending Mr. Bean memes in their group chats about how weak the Iranian retaliation was going to be. So this is not just a situation of pure, you know, motivated reasoning. We were lying to them, et cetera, et cetera. Like, the Americans appeared to have actually believed some of this, that Iran's retaliation was going to be weak. I've seen reports that they thought that Iran was out of drones. I don't know why you would think this baffling. Their drones are extremely cheap to produce. Like they've used them, but why would you think they didn't have more? And I just want to point out, right, so their point of reference here was, oh, Iran showed restraint in the war with Israel. You know, this was a 12 day conflict where Israel and Iran sort of fired missiles at each other and stuff after Israel assassinated a bunch of people for doing nuclear stuff. But okay, let's look at this for a second. My brother in Christ, you killed the Fucking Ayatollah, this is an existential war for survival of the regime. Of course they were going to target your oil facilities. Are you fucking kidding me? Your goal here was regime change. You literally assassinated their fucking head of state. You literally killed him. What the fuck did you think was going to happen? Oh, my God, these people are so fucking dumb. And like, you know, and it's obviously not clear exactly, like who knew what about this plan. But again, like, it seems like the plan was put into place because they had the opportunity to kill Ayatollah Khomeini. And like, okay, if that's true, and presumably the Gulf states would know that, why the fuck would they not expect retaliation? I expected this. I'm a podcaster. I mean, I know I'm very smart, but like, these people are. These people and their advisors are running fucking like some of the most important governments in the entire world. I don't know. Monarchy, Bad system of government. Electing Donald Trump also apparently bad system of government. You're getting just. Oh my God. Holy fuck. These people are stupid. Oh my God. They really, truly, they really, truly believed that Iran was not going to pick up the weapon and that it has always had. That has always been the thing. For what? The reason why you don't fight this fucking war, even if you don't care about Iranian lives, that you're willing to spend American lives. Right? They really thought they wouldn't do it. I just, I just, I can't get over this. I just. Oh my God. Oh, I don't know. I don't know. Okay, we're, we're, we're going to go to ads. I'm bad as hell. I'm not going to take it anymore. Here's the ads. Foreign. Okay, calming down a little bit. Let's get back to the actual oil of it all. So let's talk about the quality of the oil here. Now, sharp eared listeners may remember that when I talked about Venezuelan oil back during our Executive Disorder episode about the previous war a couple of months ago, a sentence so unhinged I had to go back, check the date to make sure that I wasn't hallucinating. But no, it was January 3, 2026, when we had our last war with a major oil producer where we in some way incapacitated or killed the head of state. By the way, we're still just like holding Maduro hostage. This is just still a thing that we're doing right now. Incredible stuff. Incredible. Like normal government shit, bad things happening. But in that episode, which would have been the executive disorder that came out on Friday the January 9th. I talked about how Venezuelan crude oil is not very good, right? It's extremely sour, kind of sucks. The chemical composition is bad. The oil in the Gulf is not like that. This is good oil. This is 1/5 of the world's crude oil supply, right? And also it is now because of Cotter's like liquefied natural gas production. This is now also a shutdown of a significant portion of the world's liquefied natural gas, which is again extremely important to the economy. And also, you know, one of the biggest sort of climate hoaxes in all of this, right? And I'm saying climate hoaxes here. There's been a whole push to be like, oh, we should transition to natural gas because it's cleaner than oil. And like kind of a little bit in the sense that like dunking your head into a swamp is probably cleaner than dunking your head directly into like a shitful toilet. And also it's only cleaner assuming that no methane escapes through the production process. But the thing is methane fucking escapes during the production process of natural gas all the fucking time. And methane is like, to get a sense. So we're talking about greenhouse, greenhouse gases here, right? And obviously we're familiar with CO2 as like the major pollutant that we, that we produce. Methane is a greenhouse gas that is so fucked that it is better to light it on fire and have it burn and have it emit that CO2 into the air that is better for the environment than letting fucking methane into it. It is that fucked of a greenhouse gas, right? And you know, a lot of this stuff escapes. And this is, this is a point that I've been, you know, trying to find a thing to put in this episode, right? One of the big things here is why are we still using oil to this extent? And you know, it has to do with sort of, I mean, just, just the, the utter cowardice and evil and short sighted profit motive chasing of the entire world ruling class. It has to do with specific efforts by the oil lobby in order to make sure that politics would happen like this. You know, I mean, we could talk about like the role of Pennsylvania and like fracking as like an electoral thing. We can talk about sort of the kind of Andreas Malm fossil capital thesis about the place that you want to produce things being a place that both has stable energy and also a sort of, I don't know, I guess the capitalists would call it disciplined workforce, but like a workforce that's not like organized and that's not militant so you can exploit them. And the places where those things are true, for example, like this century largely has been China where, you know, if you try to do independent union organizing, they will arrest you. Sometimes you will get disappeared. And that also coincides with, you know, they have an, they have an energy grid and the energy grid is extremely pollution intensive. It still is even as you know, China's sort of renewable energy push has been happening, is still extremely carbon intensive. So, okay, obviously like we're in this nightmare because a whole bunch of people really, really, really, really desperately want us to burn the entire world alive so they can keep making money. But returning to the original thing before I got pissed off about people saying that natural gas is cleaner than oil. It's like just fucking use literally any other way to generate energy that's not fucking oil or natural gas or coal or I guess nuclear too. But like we have other ways of generating power. We could do this, but because we haven't done this, this massive decrease in oil supply because again, nothing's fucking going through the Gulf. There's like a couple of ships have gone through this is causing a crisis in the global economy. I'm going to quote the Wall Street Journal. If the Strait is still closed this Friday, output in the region could fall by more than 4 million barrels. Conover, who's an analyst, they were quoting earlier estimates. The decline could reach about 9 million by the end of March, representing almost a tenth of global demand. Now it's worth noting here, right, that you know, you look at a tenth of global demand and you go, oh, okay, so it's like a 10% reduction, but it's actually way worse than that because again, people, people have this tendency to look at oil as just liquid money that moves freely around the world. But that reduction in supply is not evenly distributed across the world, right? There are countries who have extraordinary needs of it who get their oil from the Middle East. This is places like, for example, Korea, from Thailand, Myanmar. We're going to get, we're going to get to you in a little bit are places who are relying on this oil. And you know, for, for South Korea, it's like 70% of their oil comes from this region, right? So that 10% of global demand is not spread evenly across the world is intensified into acute crises in very, very specific economies. And this is a compounding crisis because as the Wall Street Journal points out, like, it's not just that the Strait is closed for the first time ever, right? The Strait has never been closed. Like there was a point where the US was like escorting things through during the Iran Iraq war. But like it's never just been closed before. It's not just that like, you know, oil, natural gas and fertilizer isn't coming out of there either, which is a real fucking problem that we'll talk about in a second. This is not just an immediate crisis of we can't move the oil that we have out there is a secondary crisis which is that where the fuck do you put the oil, right? If you get one thing out of listening to me talk about oil, it's that again, it's not just liquid money, it's a material substance. And the actual substance of oil and what it is and how it's produced has really wide reaching political effects, right? Because when you take stuff out of the ground, the system is designed so that it is moved extremely quickly. Now there are countries like Iraq that could in theory still produce oil, right? But there aren't enough containers to store it, so they have to shut production down. Now you could be like, okay, well, but why don't they just ship it out through the Mediterranean? And the answer is that the pipelines and the shipping equipment there just don't have the throughput. Oil distribution is very, very flexible. And this is what makes disrupting it harder than something like coal used to be. But it is designed to a point to be sort of nodal and flexible and able to sort of deal with supply reduction crises, right? It's not designed to deal with this, which is a full on energy crisis level, like oh my God, we can't get oil out through the trade of Hormuz. This is a scale of issue that can't simply be solved by just moving the supply around and distributing it differently. This is not a solution to this. And so these are having these interlocking effects, right? Because also again, these things are designed to be going constantly. And it's not just a thing where you can just turn it off and turn it back on again. It doesn't work like that. These are actual very, very complicated technical processes. If you turn these things off, this is again very important. If you turn these wells off, some of them will never turn back on again. So we're talking about permanent damage to the supply, right? Even if tomorrow, right, like the war is suddenly over and everything quote unquote goes back to normal, we're talking about still like permanent damage to why? And this is where again you can be like, well, okay, like why don't we just transition from oil. And again, you can also ask like, why should we give a about this? There's a few reasons. When I say this is a compounding crisis. The Wall Street Journal talked about this a little bit, but in every article you read about this, you will will see people making the argument that oh, it's fine, like the US is more insulated than it was from oil prices in the 70s when it just like caused a major global crisis. And that's kind of true to a certain extent, right. The US is an oil producer. But also again, oil is not just something that's used for cars, right? And our domestic economy doesn't just rely on oil. Like you can't just, you know, you can, you make plastics out of oil, right? But even that, you don't just make things wholesale out of oil. Like everything you consume has other things in it and it relies on products like for example, aluminum and you know, things like copper and everything from basic commodities to sort of like refined goods that rely on there being oil. Right. Like again, we're talking about South Korea's economy. South Korea produces. There's a whole bunch of microchip production stuff that goes on there. You know, there's like Samsung, right. Major phone manufacturer. So there's all of this very, very high tech stuff too. On, on the sort of on, on the bottom end. We're talking about like you can't refine aluminum anymore, you know, right. Not that you can't. Like, like places are shutting down their capacity to do it because they can't get oil or they can't afford this oil. To the extent that we're seeing something called force majorum being deployed by a whole bunch of companies across the world in different sectors. And force majority is this, is this legal concept you can apply that's like, it's like an act of God where for example, like I don't know if there's like a once in a century earthquake and it like obliterates your factory, you're not legally liable to pay st because it's an act of God like you, you can't be legally held liable for it. And people are doing this for their aluminum production to say like, yeah, sorry, we can't meet our contracts, we can't meet our quotas that you bought from us. Like not our fault, nothing we can do about it. It's happening with oil producers. Because it's also worth noting that it's not just that the strait is closed. Iran is also hitting oil facilities. Israel is also hitting oil Facilities in Iran, they hit one in Tehran, like a massive one in Tehran that's releasing all of these fucking toxic chemicals into the air. And that has set off a massive ecological crisis. Because all of these people are. Enormous numbers of people in Iran are going to die because of this. Not just because of the bombings, but because it turns out when you fucking blow up an oil facility, releases a bunch of extremely toxic chemicals into the air that caused cancer and stuff like that. And so what you're dealing with, right, is this crisis in which all of these different aspects of the economy that rely on oil are impacted, right? It's basic commodities, it's highly advanced, like parts of like semiconductor manufacturing. It's, you know, all of these things that rely on oil are suddenly constrained and suddenly supply chains are fragmenting. You know, the US gets things from all over the world, but the crisis right now has mostly been hitting East Asia, right? I talked about Korea, we talked about Thailand. But the thing is, right, crises in East Asia do not stay in East Asia. Like the Asian market collapse heralded a whole bunch of other debt crises. This is the Asian market collapse in the 90s, right? Heralds a bunch of debt crises in places like Mexico, heralds the collapse of the US economy during the dot com bubble. It causes, as I say, say it with me, longtime listeners of the show, is what causes the reverse Plaza Accords try to bail out the entire world economy, which is where the US like nuked its own manufacturing economy by reversing Reagan's attempt to force all of the rest of the countries in the world to increase the value of their currencies relative to the dollar so the US could compete in manufacturing better, you know, so it affects all these places, you know, and that, that effect will boomerang back here. But, but as, as is always true with American imperialism, the people suffering from this the most are not Americans. It's people in Iran, right? It's people who are getting fucking blown up. It's people who are breathing in toxic chemicals. It's people whose lives have been destroyed and ruined by American imperialism. And beyond Iran, it's Pakistan, it's India, it's Bangladesh, it's Taiwan, it's Thailand, it's the Philippines, South Korea, it's Myanmar, like it's Indonesia, I mean, to lesser than Indonesia. But, you know, we're talking about potential crop failures from lack of fertilizer, right? We're talking about economic ruin. We're talking about the destabilization of the world economy or talking about people dying from fucking cancer when we're talking about the global economic effects of this, that's what we're really dealing with here, regardless of what happens on the American stock markets is a whole bunch of people who never had anything to do with this fucking suffering and dying because of the fucking greed and pride and vanity and hatred of the American ruling class. Now I'm going to close on a slightly lighter note, which is people who follow the economy very closely will be talking about how cospi, the Korean index had a massive bubble and that's why it collapsed and that's why you had like two circuit breakers and that's why it's going down so much. That's kind of true, right? But that bubble is an AI bubble. Now it is a larger and more concentrated version of the American AI bubble. But you know, the American economy is an AI bubble. And the thing about AI is that it's propped up by gas prices, right? AI is enormously, enormously fuel intensive. It just wastes a staggering, unhinged amount of energy, right? And it can only really function as long as those oil prices are very cheap and as long as, you know, natural gas prices are cheap. And it's also worth noting that, you know, these AI things are also due to physical infrastructure. And because these people are just like absolute clowns, they've been buying into the Gulf monarchies, attempts to attract a tech sector there, so they've been hit. And Iran has been taking advantage of this by hitting Amazon data centers in the Gulf states. So that's another way where this can potentially just sort of toss a nuke into the global economy is that like the price of running all of these AI things suddenly starts to increase. And the kind of worst case scenario scenario for this, right, the one that we've been looking at in terms of what could happen to the world economy is what's been being discussed more and more, which is a version of the crisis of the 70s, which is an economic crisis of increasing inflation and also increasing unemployment that completely reshaped the entire global economy. It's why we have neoliberalism. You know, it's a complete collapse of the social democratic system that had come before it. It changes the entire global world order, right? The US goes off the gold standard, like it things changed. That had never changed before. And we're going to talk about that more on the tariff episode. But that to a large extent to the ruling class, is what is at stake here, right? It's whether it is worth destroying the global economy in order for Trump to kill more people in Iran. This has been nick it happen here. No one knows what the future holds, but you deserve a weather app that can help. Weatherbug is easy to use and provides forecasts for your every need from storm warnings to pollen levels right at your fingertips. Get the fastest local Alerts and comprehensive 10 day forecasts wherever you are. Its hyperlocal real time customizable alerts. Make sure the weather never takes you by surprise so you can plan every day with with confidence. Download the free Weatherbug app from the app Store today and start getting accurate weather forecasts 247 did you know you can get your prep for free? Prep is a once daily peel that's up to 99% effective at preventing the transmission of HIV. Mr. Makes it easy and free to get started all online, no doctor's office and no paperwork. They also provide free Doxy Pep, a simple antibiotic you take after sex to help prevent certain STIs. Kind of like morning after pill for STIs. Whether you have insurance or not, mistr's got you covered in three easy steps. 1. Sign up@mistr.com 2. Consult with a licensed doctor online and 3 complete your at home testing kit. Then your medication is delivered discreetly right to your door. It's safe, easy and completely judgment free. Protect yourself and protect each other. Sign up@mistr.com today when your schedule sounds like this. Are you kidding me? An oil change is the last thing you have time for. So drive into Take five and let our techs change your oil. Check your tires, top off your fluids and have you back on the road. Pits stop fast all while you stay in your car. No putting your entire schedule on hold. No upsells, no problem. So you can get back to your to do list or not. Find your nearest shop@take5.com Take 5 the stay in your car 10 minute oil change support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On public, you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable income index. With AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year. You can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors, llc. SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete Disclosures available at public.comdisclosures hey everybody, Robert Evans here and this is It Could Happen Here today. We've got a special episode for you. This is a guest episode by Olive, a Minneapolis resident and movement legal worker who hosts the Outlaw podcast. So without further ado, here's Olive. Hi and welcome to the first crossover episode of It Could Happen Here and Outlaw, an anti oppression podcast where we demystify how the law is used to neutralize dissent in the U.S. i'm your host, Olive. I live in Minneapolis, and if you've read a single headline over the last two months, you probably know that we are battling the largest, largest immigration enforcement operation in U.S. history. Since early December, Minnesota has been occupied by 3,000 agents from immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection CBP who have already abducted, imprisoned and deported at least 4,000 people in the face of this devastating federal occupation. People are showing up every single day to defend their migrant neighbors in unimaginably beautiful ways. And on the other side of this effective resistance is expansive legal repression, all of the many ways the state uses the law and its enforcement mechanisms to crush dissent. More than 400 people have been arrested for protesting ICE or following ice vehicles, with 35 of them now facing federal charges under 18 USC 111 assaulting, resisting or impeding a federal officer. I think it's really important for those of you outside of Minnesota to know how law enforcement and political prosecution are working here, because it might come to where you live too. And it's different than other kinds of movement repression that I've seen. Instead of the agencies that normally police citizen protesters, like local and state cops or the FBI, it's primarily ICE and CBP who are carrying out arrests, and it's Homeland Security Investigations doing the investigations. It's happening this way because arrests are mostly happening when people are responding to ICE activity, and so those are the agencies who are present to make arrests. This impacts everything from how arrests go down and the conditions of incarceration to the kinds of charges that people are catching. To understand what all this actually means you need to hear from those who are experiencing it, the people who have been detained and prosecuted for protesting ice. So in this episode, you'll hear two interviews from Minneapolis rapid responders. First, you'll hear from Clem and Ray about their experience being arrested out of their car and taken into ICE detention. And second, Lucy and Isabel will talk about catching charges and navigating cases during the surge. Stick around at the end for a special treat, a poem from Isabel and a new song out of Minneapolis that responds to the surge. And just a heads up before we get into it, in this episode, you're going to hear people talk about their firsthand experiences with police violence. So take care of yourself. And if you like the episode, check out the other episodes of Outlaw wherever you listen to podcasts, not being afraid to be indigenous, from the north, from the south, from everywhere. Welcome to Outlaw. You're both here to talk about legal repression of ICE Watch in Minneapolis over the past two months. Can you both introduce yourselves briefly and your connection to the Twin Cities? I am Ray. I use they them pronouns. I'm from here. I grew up here and have lived most of my life in the Twin Cities. And I now live in Potterhorn Park. That's in south Minneapolis, site of high ICE activity, the highest, I believe. I would think that is true. And quite close to the sites of George Floyd as well as Renee Goode's murders. My name is Clem. I've lived in the cities for like five years maybe now. I grew up in the Southwest and I also live like on the border of Powderhorn in the central neighborhood. So kind of, yeah, halfway between where Renee was shot and where George Floyd was killed. So you both were arrested while you were doing ICE Watch in your car. For people who are listening, this gets called commuting here. It can look different ways, but it often involves a hyperlocal signal call with a dispatcher and commuters to be able to notify and dispatch rapid responders when ICE is around. Commuters track ICE vehicles, oftentimes following them around, which ICE doesn't like. So my question for you two is what kinds of tactics have you witnessed state agents use to stop this kind of rapid response organizing? I feel like they have escalated and it always depends on the agent. But there's times where they'll just slow roll and drive like a normal person. There's times where they'll run red lights, they'll brake, check you. They'll just like go in loops around the city to try and lose you. And then Depending on how aggro they are, they'll try and pull you over and intimidate you, or they'll try and lead you to, like, a police station or have a sheriff pull you over. And they've threatened people with, like, stalking charges and stuff like that. And, yeah, we personally have been. We've had agents come up to our windows when we were commuting. The two of us, we've had. We followed agents, like, all the way to northeast and a long time, probably like an hour. And then eventually downtown, they had sheriffs pull up on us and pull us over and tell us to stop following. And then we have the other thing that I'm sure you want to talk to us about. A lot of what we've been seeing is just this recklessness, like, speeding through red lights and not signaling, just, like, a lot of, like, traffic violations. And then once you're pulled over, just having your windows smashed in and like, them using all these intimidation tactics, but, like, not necessarily detaining people. Yeah. And all of these vehicles don't necessarily look like a cop car. It's pretty rare for them to, like, actually turn on their lights and sirens. So when they're going through intersections as quote, unquote, law enforcement, it's pretty rare for someone to see them. And there are times where we almost witness, like, t bones of them just recklessly running a red light. Yeah, all the time. There's been a good number of car accidents also involving their cars, right? Yeah. And, like, not even caused by commuting. They've just slipped on ice and ran into poles. And then they tear gas observers who are heckling them because they don't know how to drive in Minnesota. Yeah, exactly. Let's turn to January 7, 2026. The same day Renee Goode was killed by ICE, you both were out commuting. Can you tell me about how that day started for you? It was me picking up Clem, and immediately there was, like, a sus car that, like, zoomed off. And then Clem checked the plates, and it was ICE that we think was just waiting outside of the house to intimidate. Unclear, but I mean, it certainly felt that way. Had anything happened like that to you before Clem with them targeting the house? Wasn't there something that. I think at that point, because they've used the tactic, too, of, like, when an observer is tailing them, they'll run your license plate and then drive you back to your house that the car is registered to as an intimidation tactic, and they'll get out and take pictures of the house. But I think at that point, me and my roommates, that hadn't happened yet. But we had spent a lot of time at Whipple, like, just observing the cars going in and out of the gates and trying to record all that data. And when you're there, there's just, like, intimidation vehicles that will just, like, drive up right next to your driver's side window and film you and take pictures. So we'll certainly in some sort of database at that point. But what's Whipple? Whipple is the federal building that is near Fort Snelling State park, which is by the airport, and that's where ICE has been operating out of. And it's the command headquarters for, like, the entire upper Midwest. So Wisconsin, Minnesota, the Dakotas. I think Iowa, too. Okay. So the day starts off, there's an ICE agent outside your house, and you get in the car to start commuting. Tell me about what happens next. The abandoned car. Yeah, yeah, yeah. The first thing I responded to is near Little Earth, which is, like, a gated community, but for, like, people who are like, an urban reservation is what it calls itself. And there was a call of ICE at a park nearby there. And we showed up, and there was just an abandoned car. And when I went and talked to someone on the street who's standing next to it, basically explained the situation of ICE rolled up on them, and they ran on foot and left the car, and they basically had to push the car out of the road, and then they ended up locking it because the person's documents. So I was staying with the car and calling tow truck companies that have offered free tows for people who have gone abducted. And so we were probably there for, like, I don't know, more than 30 minutes. And I think, as I was happening is when Renee was shot. So neither of us were, like, on the call or looking at chats or anything, and we, like, went home for a break, and that's when we heard the news of that. Yeah, because I live really close by to there. And there was a lot of swirling information, so people saying, you know, someone was shot. And then at first, people being like, come down to this area. And then, you know, very shortly after, people being like, it's totally cordoned off. Don't come down. There's also enough observers, and we need people to be out there doing this still, because, like, we can't invest all of our resources into this. One thing that's happening, and probably within the hour is when we got the message that Was saying that there were vehicles staged in a parking lot down the street. So we drove down there, and there were already observers, people in cars and on foot, probably around 30 people. And it was kind of a standoff of these vehicles, probably around 5ish vehicles. And then people blowing whistles, honking horns. And so Clem and I were there in the car doing that. So you see the news that Renee was killed, and for doing exactly what you were doing, Driving around your neighborhood to look out for your neighbors, and you get back in the car and you keep going. Yeah, that didn't stop us. I mean, if anything, it, you know, made us feel like we need to be out here because they're not stopping. We're not gonna stop either. So you said you arrive at the next scene, where are you, and what is ICE doing there? Yeah, it's the dollar tree parking lot, which is, like, on Lake street and the uptown area. And, yeah, there's five vehicles, presumably staging is what we've been calling it, where there's, like, parked, planning what they're going to do next. And there weren't any agents out of car. It was just a bunch of cars sitting there that we knew were ICE and a bunch of observers were responding. Yeah, we were just, like, in the parking lot. They could still have driven around us. Like, there was room on either side of our car that they could have driven past us. And then in addition to that, they could have driven around. Like, there were just several options for them to get around us. At that point, I think some agents got out and were like, move your vehicle. Move your vehicle. And one of the cars, this, like, huge SUV rammed the back of my car to get it out of the way. While you were in it? We were in it, yeah. And I think at that point, Clem turned to me and was like, they're gonna smash out the windows. And I was like, yep. And so at that point, I think we were both prepared for. For what was gonna happen. I guess, though, also, I mean, once they smashed the back of the car, I was thinking, like, okay, they got us out of the way. Like, that might be it. But then. So car's out of the way, but they all got out of their vehicles. They first maced the windows. So it's like they have a dye in it. It's like a bright orange. And they maced the passenger, the driver, and the windshield windows. And then they came around on. They smashed both. Both the passenger and driver windows and then sprayed bare mace through Clem's side into Both of our faces. Right before they smashed the windows. We grabbed each other's hands and we just held hands as it was happening around us. And then I saw that bright orange mace coming from the passenger window. So they sprayed it directly in Clem's face. And then they reached over and sprayed me. And they were able to open up the doors with the window smashed. And they dragged us out and he punched me in the jaw, like in the lip really, while they cuffed me. And they used pain compliance. It's like a. I mean, it's torture. So they. They pull my wrist up or my hand up against my. My arm with the cuffs on. And then pulled me or like up against the vehicle where I was detained separately from Clem. But Clem, you can talk about what happened to you at that same time. Yeah, so I could feel the door open. And then they tried to yank me out and undo my seatbelt. And I was holding onto the seat belt and eventually they got that undone. And I was just like trying to hold on to you as tight as I could until they were able to break that grasp. And then two agents pulled me out and slammed me on the floor and got on top of me and put me in cuffs. And I'm still just have my eyes closed so the mace doesn't get in them. And yeah, from there I fell a few times and kept just being dead weight. And they kept trying to take me to cars, but they didn't know which car they were supposed to go to, where they would go to a car, and they didn't have the keys for it. So I would just like kept getting walked in circles not seeing what was going on and like hearing the confusion of all of them. Until eventually I got put in the back of a car. And you got put into a separate car on the way there. I mostly just was focused on breathing through the pain on the way to Whipple. And like with was so disgusting to me. I mean, it was so fresh in our minds that Renee had just been killed, right. And I'm hearing them singing on the radio. There was one agent who was singing like, I got a puck. I got a pucket full of sunshine or something like that and a lot of laughter. I remember the phrases fucking Somalis. And later one of them complaining about all these whistles. And I remember thinking like, oh yeah, they're working. And wasn't too long before we arrived in the garage. It's this giant garage where they process people and they're mostly agents, vehicles. And people have been detained Like a line of people have been detained. Yeah, I just want to point a couple things out in what you both have said that's a little bit different than we normally see in protest related legal repression, which is one, detention of people who are citizen protesters or just people arrested for protest activity by ice, by immigration enforcement or by federal agents in general. That's usually something that is done by state or local law enforcement, cops or sheriffs, and people are taken to the local jail for processing. But here what's happening is you're being taken to Whipple, which is the ICE detention center where all non citizens detained by ICE for immigration reasons are also taken and processed. But you're also being brought there. So you're getting a window into ICE operations and you're taken into a place that people also normally don't have access to. It's a pretty high security building that they don't like people from the outside inside. But there you are in the garage, right? Yeah. So we're, we're on our knees and at one point I commented on, on how young the people looked that were holding Clem and they pulled us apart and they brought me to the opposite side of the garage and they're still using the pain compliance. They're filming me the whole time. There was just a bunch of agents that were filming me and like three guys that were like on me. And I said to them, I said, make it hurt, daddy. And I was being mouthy and just this one guy in particular seemed really freaked out by that. And they, he pushed me to the ground with my face to the floor and he said, you like the dirt, queer? And my reaction for a lot of the time that this was happening is I just was laughing and laughing and I said, yeah, I fucking love the dirt. Like I love the dirt more than anything. And I don't know how long I was like that, but they kept me on the ground and then eventually brought us in to bring us to the cells. We walked past like this central command hub with all these people who are working in this so called Metro surge operation. And then on the left were cells of people who had been detained. I think we passed at least five cells from what we could see. And they were filled just like wall to wall of black and brown people that. Yeah, and like one toilet in there. So probably at least like two or three hundred people in there. The desolation sticks with me. And they led me to a separate cell. Then Clem and this other person that we were detained with, and these were seemingly like, the remaining cells that were available in the. In the whole area, because, I mean, it was just full up. Like, they were, like, completely at capacity with the number of people they've abducted. Clem and I were in there for hours with Mace in our. In our eyes and, like, no relief from that. And I remember just laying on the ground and an agent coming in pretty soon after being an asshole. And he was like, we've got gourmet potato and chicken and Brussels sprouts or something. And he hands me this, like, little plastic container with, like, this. Just this white paste or, like, just nasty, you know, just like. Like a microwave meal of goop. Goop. Just disgusting goop. But we were in there for a while before being taken back. And I. I think they took me back first. And I refused to say anything without a lawyer, obviously. They hand me a piece of paper, and after reading me my rights, and they said, actually, we need you to read these back to us to confirm that you speak English and understand English. And I was like, weird, but okay. So I start to read it, and it's all pretty normal. And then I get to a paragraph that said something to the effect of, like, knowing these rights, I. Or I. I waive my rights. So I was being tricked into waiving my rights, which I thought I was going crazy. I did not understand at the time. And I. I stopped halfway through the sentence, and I read it over and over and over, trying to make sense of it. And I said to them, I was like, I don't understand what I'm being asked to read. I'm not going to keep reading this. And they were like, that's okay. We have what we need. And they took it back. And then I got a phone call. Clem did not. We got taken into the interrogation room, and it was like, two Homeland Security. I don't know, like, detective or whatever. But they, like, opened it with saying, like, I know this is all, like, can be a lot right now, so feel free to just, like, let it loose in this room. And I just, like, kind of looked at them like, what are you talking about? Like, it's. It was jarring to go from dealing with a month of seeing only these people in masks and just, like, as this, like, horrible monstrosity of, like, a fascist. And then being inside of there and, like, seeing that command center of all those people working on the computers, like, making this whole thing work, and then all these detectives who, like, think they're detached from it and think that they're not a part of what's going down on the streets right now just because they're working inside the building. And yeah, so same thing happened. They tried to ask me questions, and I said I wouldn't say anything without a lawyer president. And I asked for a phone call and they did the same thing with the rights where they were going to read them to me. And then the other detectives said, actually, we don't need to do that. And so one of them just left for a bit. And so I was just, like, left in the room with. With the, like, assistant detective. And he just, like, asked me some how's your day going? Question. I just kind of dead stared him for, like, 20 minutes, which felt pretty good because he was very uncomfortable and kept just, like, avoiding eye contact. And I don't know. It's the small amount of power you can have when you're in a cage. And I got taken back to my room and tried the intercom and asked if I could get a phone call. And they said, I'll get a phone call after booking. So I was pretty worried about what was going to happen. Eventually they said they had a lawyer present. And yeah, two real cool lawyers were there that we know and are friends with. And they explained that we'd be out pretty shortly. And, yeah, and then we were able to get out and go home. But I feel really haunted by the fact that we were in there for maybe a handful of hours. And of course, there are all these people that are stuck there that aren't going to be able to go home the way we did. And then I took the most painful shower of my life because the water just. I did the cold water thing and my lawyer friend had warned me about it was like, you know, try not to get it in your bits. But I totally did, and it was excruciating. One of the things we talk about on the show is how to counteract the chilling effect of oppression and just the trauma of a day like this that having violent interactions with law enforcement can cause. And I really appreciate you both sharing and going back into this experience that happened now almost exactly a month ago from when we're recording today. I'm curious if you have thoughts on what you've learned and moving through this experience, lessons you've learned that you'd want others to know about, about how to move through something like this and. And keep getting out there, as I know you both have. I don't really know how to move through it, but it's. Yeah, I feel like it still lives in my body. And that fear has definitely changed me. But it's been nice to have friends and community and there's been a lot of, like, free sort of like body work. And I tried acupuncture for the first time, which was really nice. Yeah, just having people that have your back and knowing that, like, you're not alone in this. Like, since we've been arrested, there's been hundreds of people in the same exact boat as us. And yeah, it feels good to know we're not an outlier here. Unapologetically. Unapologetically myself. Like most anti ICE protesters arrested here during the surge, Clem and Ray were released pending charges. But the legal landscape is rapidly shifting. At least 30 out of the 35 federal cases from the past two months were charged with. Charged retroactively in the past few weeks. To give you a sense of how these cases might unfold and what it's like to face these charges, you'll hear from two Minneapolis based anti ICE protesters facing criminal charges for responding to a raid at Taqueria Las Cuatros Milpas that took place back on June 3, 2025. Isabel Lopez faces federal charges and Lucy faces state, state charges from that day. Their June cases are still open today and Lucy also caught federal charges after responding to an ICE raid that took place during Operation Metro Surge. Welcome, Isabel and Lucy. We're going to talk today about legal repression you both are experiencing for protesting ICE in Minneapolis. But before, before we even start that conversation, can you both introduce yourselves, your connection to the Twin Cities and share a little bit about who you are outside of the topic of today's conversation? Isabel, we can start with you. Hi, my name Isabela. I'm a community, I don't know, organizer, helper, and I'm also a spoken word poet. I've been writing and doing performances here in the Twin Cities for like, since like 2020 with the whole George Floyd thing. Yeah, and I've also done other organizing when it comes to the climate justice movement and also indigenous rights. I have Zapotec, Benzada, and like, that's just important for me. So. Yeah, but I was born in Chicago, raised here in the Twin Cities. Hi, Lucy. I've been in Minneapolis since, I don't know, the early 2000 and tens, but I lived in Minnesota forever. I mean, I've been in and out, but I feed people. I'm a loud bitch. I make noises, I make songs, make good trouble. Okay, so you were both arrested and charged after a multi agency raid that took place back on June 3, 2020. 5. At Las Quatro Milpas, a Mexican taqueria in south Minneapolis, officials still say that it was not an ICE raid and that they were executing a warrant for drug trafficking. But ICE agents were confirmed on site alongside 10 other federal agencies and local cops, and the owner of the taqueria ended up in ICE detention. The Raiden response went pretty viral. The operation was heavily militarized, and hundreds of neighbors turned out in protest. Issa, you were charged with three counts of obstructing, impeding, or assaulting a federal officer and a fourth count of impeding a federal investigation. And, Lucy, you're facing state level charges from that day and federal assault charges. I'd love to hear from you both a little bit about your experiences getting arrested and catching charges. What do you want people to know about what that experience was like? Yeah, so I wasn't arrested until like, three or four days later because that happened on June 3rd, and then I was arrested on June 9th. It felt very planned and just like a puppet show. I remember, I think it was the day after two senators from the house here in Minnesota were shot. And Georgia Fort, you know, was really close. Community friend of mine were both from the east side, and she called me to do an interview. I was kind of unsure about it, but she just assured me that she just wanted to hear my story. And, yeah, I didn't really think much of it. And so then I went, I did the interview. I was still very shaken up about what happened that day. By around like, four, I think, or like three, I was coming out. And by that time in downtown, there's not a lot of things going on in St. Paul. It's kind of a dead city by that time. And so as I was coming out, that's when four officers came from behind me and arrested me and pushed me to the ground. And my shoulder hit the concrete and I started bleeding. And they took me in the black SUV and they waited there for a second. And that's when Georgia came out and saw everything that was happening and started recording and from there let the community know about what happened. And so after that, that's when I kind of started realizing what this administration is trying to do. And it felt very orchestrated. It felt very calculated. Even after, especially after there was a lot of news about my arrest and adding my face to this whole drug raid and my case to it. So, yeah, I know other people were arrested, but my arrest felt very, like, intentionally uncalculated and kind of racist. This is an abuse of power, and this isn't okay. Like, I don't care who you are, I don't care how you see things. Like, I'm like, barely not even 5, 3, 5, 2. And you know, these men that were huge felt the need to tackle me. This is all allegedly right. But at the same time, I think that I want people to understand that they can make their own calls and own judgment and how like this justice system isn't that right now at all. It's repression. Am I also remembering correctly that I maybe had seen you post a video on Instagram about that raid? Because I feel like in my impression, it also felt like maybe retaliation for you speaking out. Yeah, definitely. Your case feels important for people to know about. Especially in the past two weeks here in Minneapolis, 28 people have been charged with assault on a federal officer and are facing federal charges now. There was a handful before that, but we've just seen a massive spike of people who were charged after being released pending charges. So your case does feel like this test case that's being looked to is how are they going to handle this and what's going to happen? So I appreciate you talking about it. Would love to turn to you, Lucy, and hear a little bit about what you're facing and what your experience has been. Like, I think they charged me with assault and then they downgraded it to like less degree assault because it was ridiculous. But yeah, like they had like six cops tackle me and my shoulder's never been the same. But that was. That was in June. And then in another instance, I also have charges for assaulting a federal officer. Seems like they just charge everyone, you know. And like all of these legal observers are also getting doxxed by the ag. They're trying to raise the stakes of resisting the administration as much as possible because it is a popular movement. It's like generally popular to hate ice, but they're trying to make it as expensive and as irrevocably life destroying for US Citizens as it is for people who aren't US citizens. I think it's super important to highlight the ways in which these targeted political prosecutions are being used to raise the stakes of showing up to defend your community from abduction, from death, from surveillance and intimidation and fascist violence. Do you know who else was arrested that day? There was two people arrested on June 3rd. They were both arrested in the same interaction with a police officer. A young woman was standing in front of a police vehicle and an officer approached her, like, super rapidly. And then someone approached that officer. And from the video, it seems like that person ripped off a thin blue line lapel Velcro from the officer. And then that officer proceeded to assault that person. And then that person was accused of assault. And then my federal charges. The government has motioned to dismiss them, but we are motioning to dismiss them with prejudice. And during that interaction, I can't really speak to what happened between me and federal officers, but a pregnant woman was assaulted by federal officers. People were tased, people were hit with batons. And that woman had like a ICE agent on top of her for like, I don't know, a half hour. People said that she miscarried, she was pregnant. Everyone was saying she was pregnant. She was dragged by one arm between the legs of the ICE officer. They said that she spray painted a car and that was the reason for the arrest. They also said that there was no proof of that either. And that incident was one of the first immigration operations in the surge or one of the earlier ones that went pretty viral. There was a lot of coverage. It was a huge raid, big community turnout. It was also like ICE was on the wrong block and they were in a Somali neighborhood and people were mad and people were showing up and not letting them get away with it. Also, I think there was a lot of response, my understanding was, to ICE having their knee on this pregnant person's back for such a long period of time. From what I've seen in the complaint for that day for your case, which is a public record, and I not asking you to speak to whether or not it's true or anything about it, but part of what you're being charged with is, I believe, de arresting that person, the pregnant person, while they were dragging her. And as a result you got assault on a federal officer charges. So just some context for people listening for the case as we're following it. Those are the public allegations that the government has made. But it was one of the earliest federal cases during the surge and one of the earlier assault cases of this kind. So interesting to hear that it looks like it's headed for a dismissal and exciting for you that that is the case. Isabelle, there's been community mobilization to support you starting back in June. Could you speak to what's been effective about that and what you've learned fighting these charges related to this political prosecution? I mean, in the grand scheme of things, I think that there's just been so much repression when it comes to just, you know, the Brown community. We've lost Mercado Central, which is a really dope place on Lake street, right across street from like where it happened from Los Cotro Milpas, you know, it was like raising funds so they don't close. And you know, I think, I think the Star Tribune really stuff for Latino businesses, brown businesses, they've lost like $46 million this past month. So what I'm trying to say with that is that my community is very much on the scarcity. You know, like, it's almost like we're being dragged to the point. And so when my community showed up for me that day, like, it just showed for me, like how resilient we are and how much like, it's scary, but we can't keep having other people in our communities disappear, you know, people that we can't afford. And for my case, because I'm a US Citizen, I feel very like, responsible and very like wanting to like being present in community because I think that's really what I can do. I can't really like, do a lot because of the fear that like, if I come into certain spaces, am I being watched? You know, and they've kind of shown like, hinting having an eye on me basically throughout this. But like, you know, being present with community and being there when, you know, for organizing and knowing, you know, your rights and things like that, I think has helped a lot of people in my community to one be a lot more careful. But to know that like, what we're going up against and how it's a way of survival to keep going and like, you know, to have our rights be to at least grow during these times. And we've had like observer trainings, we've had a lot of low key, smaller trainings where we're not like, trying to tell too many people about it for the same reason. And for my case in particular, it's been really hard just because, like, a lot of people are scared and a lot of people are very intimidating to speak out and, you know, advocate for what's been going on in my case because, you know, they want us to keep having this scarcity mentality and you know, being afraid of like, what's to happen, what's to come. So for me, it's just been really important for me to be with community, to be with people and to share my story in the small ways that I can. And we've been doing phone baking campaigns and also just writing in letters. They have a radar on me for sure, and know where I'm at, where I stand. But I also know that I have a really big community behind me and I know it's not Just about me. It's about the fact that it's bigger about what could happen to somebody else in our community. And it's been hard, but I think it's, it's, you know, it's important for us to know that, like, you know, we can keep pushing and like, be together in community despite all this. And so, yeah, it has been kind of hard, especially with the surge. It got even more messy, you know, just with a lot of people trying their best to keep their head above the water and helping the families that they can, because a lot of families haven't been able to leave their house. When you say we've been hosting trainings, are you referring to your support committee? You've been doing, like, events that are joint raising awareness about your case and also helping community get trained up? Is that what you mean? Well, yeah, I think. I mean, it's one in the same. I feel like the people that I'm working with, they work and do a lot of grassroots things in the community. And so I know me just showing up to those trainings and just talking about my case like that, that helps a lot. So it's like that. And we've done a couple events here and there where we talk about immigration. We did one in June or no, in July, I think. And like, we still have said to do more things with community, to just know that like, you know, we're all, we're all here in it. But it has been very nerve wracking. It's been really hard just because, like, I don't, I don't know who's watching. I don't know who's in the room. I don't know who I can trust, but I know I'm not alone. So that's, that's the best part about it. So, yeah, there's so much intentional isolation of people facing charges that so much of how repression works is to isolate people, make them scared to go be in community and do important work. So thanks for continuing to show up. It's cool to hear you speak to both, like navigating the fear and continuing to show up where you can. Yeah, I'd love to hear you both speak a little bit more. I know you just spoke about this a little bit, Isabel, but what it's been like navigating these cases amidst the past couple months of the surge here in the Twin Cities. It's a pretty unique moment to also have these pretty high stakes cases going on. Lucy, if you want to start, it just sucks. I mean, there's lots of ways of doing things, but, like, I don't want to be afraid that I need to call my pretrial release person every time a cop talks to me. Like, I don't know. Like, I. Not that I interact with cops all the time, but I'm in Minneapolis, and, like, they keep talking to the probation guy about this. I'm like, you know, if a cop drives by me, is that a police interaction? If I'm on the street and the fucking feds are in. In the street in front of my house, is that a police interaction? Like, it just makes you so stressed out. Like, Renee Goode was shot in front of me. And it's like. Like, normally, I'm not the kind of person that runs away from a situation like that on, like, would go towards where. What happened to, like, make sure people are okay or, like, see if there's anything I can do. And in that situation, I was like, what if I just am gonna go to jail, like, for trying to, like, do something? So it's just, like. It's just contrary to my instincts that if I see someone getting brutalized in the street or they're like. They say you can go to a protest, but that's just what repression is. You know, they come into your house and they look in every single room. You know that they say that you need to go do drug tests and that you can't have a firearm. And they wanted me to have 247 monitoring. I don't know if you had that kind of shit, but it's just like, this shit's insane. Like, and it's over fucking nothing. And so that's why, like, I see people on the Internet being like, oh, but, like, all those charges get dropped or whatever. I was like, then fuck you. Like, you never dealt with this. Like, doesn't matter if the charges get dropped. I'm going to try and apply to fucking Target to be a cashier. And then they're going to be like, actually, you have an active case. I tried to work at a theater. And they were like, can you come explain what happened here? Doesn't matter if you end up going to jail. Yeah, going to jail sucks. But repression is like. It's the thing in and of itself. The cruelty is the point. I want to hear from you too, Isabel. I just want to say for people listening, that what Lucy's talking about are release conditions. So when the case is initiated against you, the government could argue that you should be held in detention while the case is ongoing, or they could ask for conditions of release. And those are conditions that are enforced by a pre trial probation officer. Like person who might come to visit your house or you have to call when you have cop interactions or who facilitates drug testing, depending on what your conditions are. So just some background on that for anyone who's unfamiliar. Yeah, I think Lucy kind of said it best was like, you're like questioning your instincts. You're questioning like, what can you do? And I've tried my best to be as creative as I can with it, but yeah, it's so hard because I'm finding myself having to mobilize in a different way and show up in community. So I've kind of pivoted to art. Yeah. Doing things when it comes to screen printing and just again, just showing up in community and just try to play face or be faced. Like be, be real, you know, be with community. But yeah, it has been really hard because again, you never really know what you can and cannot say. Like, the other day I had a really good friend, they made a graphic for me talking about explaining my case and things like that. You know, I can't really post too much about my case. People start tagging me in it. I tried resharing one of it. I only shared like one of re. Shared one of the tags. And then I tried resharing another tag that kind of explained what to do to help with my case. And like, Instagram didn't let me post it. You know, these are. This is like minor shit. Like, this isn't like that big of a deal. But it's also just like, okay. Like, yeah, they want to make sure that you're not being seen or heard. And I'm pretty fortunate to have like a job where like, they're paying me to do community work and they have known me. So, like, I'm. I feel really lucky. At the same time, it's also just been really hard because, like, you know, some people are more reluctant to have me in the room when it comes to like organizing or doing certain things because of that, because, like, you know, of where my case stands. And some people have like, you know, actually kind of walked away from being my friend because, you know, they were also there that day on June 3rd and just also kind of being afraid about what would happen to them. But on the other side of that, you know, there's also been friends that are like, I'm gonna be here. I'm down. Like, don't, don't, like, don't you worry, you know, which has been great. Yeah, don't Ditch your friends. Like, I had, like, my roommate being like, I'm gonna. I gotta leave. Like, I'm gonna dip. And people being weird to you. And it's just like. I don't know, maybe you just should be better about your, like, security in general because, like, sooner or later we're all going to have charges. I don't know, maybe it's not going to be that bad. But we're all domestic terrorists in Minnesota now. I mean, as per. As per ice, you know, making a list and. I don't know. They can't jail everybody. It's just been really hard navigating. I get, I guess, like, the sense of morality that comes with it, because it's like, for me, and I feel like, you know, Lucy can relate to this, is that, like, you act on the things that you believe in. You act on the things that you know is worth participating in. And now this administration is, you know, gaslighting. I don't even think gaslighting is the right word. I think it's just like imposing a lie of just, like, what is right and what is wrong. And seeing everybody also just being very gaslit and having, you know, the news having the certain narrative of, like, what is right, what is wrong, what has been said, what has not been said, what really happened, what didn't happen happen. And also just arresting independent journalists, I think just goes to show how much Constitution has not been constituted like the human rights that we believed and we thought that we have are no more. So it's like what goes and what doesn't go, you know, And I think that for me, the only real hope I have is, like, community and, like, creativity. Because it's like, people have shown up for me because I've been showing up since, like, 2020. So it's like, how can we inspire a sense of, like, a sense of hope and spirit to keep going? How can we keep. Have people know that there is. There is hope at the end, that, you know, that there can be another side, that right now what we're seeing is just another world unfolding. And the only way that we can really understand that new world is when we understand the truth youth that we've been walking on. And so my friends have been so good to me. And some of them have been, you know, they've made, like, graphics and really cool, like, shirts with my face on it. Just a way to, like, you know, welcome me home and things like that and creating different images of, like, what this new world can be. And, you know, one thing That I did with some of the NDN collective. We made this really dope graphic that says motherland on it. And it's all the Americas having roots from the Global south, you know, and being Zapotec, like, has been really, like, so key for me to know that, like, I have every right to be here. That, like, a lot of the legitimacy that is constituted, quote, unquote, for me, that doesn't come from. For me, that's not my truth of, like, why I move and why I believe to do is right. To me, I do what is right because of the history that I come from, because of, like, you know, who my dad is and like, the people that I know that I come from. You know, I'm not like, native to the northern plains, but I do have friends that are. And I do respect and love them so much. Where I want to see the traditions be fully and thrive. And I know that my power and my liberty is tied with theirs. And I know that we, like, have every right to be here from the people that are from the global south as well, because of the fact that we haven't been able to, like, fully thrive in the motherland. We haven't been fully thrived in all the Americas. And, you know, a lot of people don't want to immigrate. A lot of people don't want to migrate. They don't want to leave their motherland. But I know that we have built homes here. We have built communities here. And I think that for me, that that's the other side of it is that we can. We can thrive and that we can be in this place together, that we have every right to. Like Bunny said in this concert last night, together, we are America. Abayela. So, yeah, I also just want to ask what support asks you have for listeners either for your defense campaigns or for anti ice organizing more broadly. Yeah, for me, we're having people call in to Daniel Rose to drop the charges and to send in letters. That's our community ask. And also to donate to the GoFundMe. Yeah, I'm finding myself needing more support when it comes to just getting people on the side and just, yeah, getting people also sustain through the movement as well through that. So, yeah, donate to my GoFundMe. And also if they can send another letter, call in and yeah, I'll just say, yeah, talk to everyone. You can talk to your neighbors, talk to your relatives. It should be impossible for them to convict anything in Minnesota because no jury is sympathetic with these people. And the only way that happens is if there's a broad understanding of the violence that is being perpetuated in our communities and a broad support of those that are resisting it. Well, I know you both have shared the importance of creative work for you. Isabel, do you have a poem you'd like to read or anything you want to share? Yeah, I can read a poem real quick. Since I can't really speak much about what happened that day. I wrote this. When I walked outside I saw eyes staring back at me, Cold presence stirring earthquake in my body. Do I freeze or do I run? I ask myself. Did my parents have the time to ask themselves this when they left the motherland? If I run, I might slip into its brute arms and be caught by its cages. If I freeze, will it drown out all the warmth my family lit inside of me? Will the cuffing freeze the southern sun in my blood veins just to be as numb as dumb? The cold thrives in control. The order of ignorance can thrive in unconscious vulnerable pride. I never thought their hands could be as brown as mine, as young as mine, as desperate for safety that it folds into another version of insanity. The wrong ice is melting and the warmth of brown and black bodies are freezing. Can I walk back into the pattern of survival my lineage taught me to flourish instead of freezing in the numbing of society. Wow. Thank you. Does that have a name? Yeah, it's Ice or Ice Freeze or something like that. Maybe I still am unapologetically, unapologetically myself. We recorded this episode in the first half of February in 2026. It's March now, so here's a couple updates. Since recording, eight of the federal defendants have had their charges dismissed and many have been offered misdemeanor deals. We also now know that there are over over 100 protesters facing state level charges, mostly misdemeanors. The aftermath of repression in the form of criminal cases from this time will likely continue for years, if not decades to come. And another update. Thousands of agents have left the Twin Cities. I get to see my neighbors out of their houses a little more often now, but daily life is still colored by on ongoing abductions, disappeared family members, and shockwaves of state violence that have hit our migrant neighbors. I know I said it in the beginning, but just to say it, to close. As much as there is devastating violence and terror happening here, there is incredibly magnificent resistance and community connection happening every single, single day. Neighbors are showing up and stopping abductions. They're watching people get killed in the street for doing it. And they're showing up the next day to continue. There's a kind of fearlessness and a kind of love that is in this community that I've never seen anywhere else. So as much as things are horrible, things are also beautiful. And I want you to know that. Pass the theme music you heard in this episode was the song Star by Two for One, a Dakota and Bara artist based out of Minneapolis. Check out their other music north from the south from Everywhere. If you liked this episode, check out the show Outlaw. Wherever you get your podcasts, throw us a rate review and follow Outlaw Pod on Instagram and Blue sky to close the episode. Here's a song written in Minneapolis during the surge. I think it captures some feeling of being here. Justice never brought someone back from the dead justice never brought someone back from the dead justice never brought someone back from the dead just as never brought someone back from the dead, just as never brought someone back from the dead. Why are you telling me to wait? Like someone will be saved? Are you telling me Are you telling me that justice was somehow saved? Never gonna get back there in. No one knows what the future holds, but you deserve a weather app that can help. Weatherbug is easy to use and provides forecasts for your every need from storm warnings to pollen levels right at your fingertips. Get the fastest local Alerts and comprehensive 10 day forecasts wherever you are. Its hyperlocal real time customizable alerts. Make sure the weather never takes you by surprise so you can plan at every day with confidence. Download the free Weatherbug app from the app Store today and start getting accurate weather forecasts 24. 7. Did you know you can get your prep for free? Prep is a once daily peel that's up to 99% effective at preventing the transmission of HIV. Mr. Makes it easy and free to get started all online, no doctor's office and no paperwork. They also provide free Doxy pep, a simple antibiotic you take after sex to help prevent certain STIs. Kind of like morning after pill for STIs. Whether you have insurance or not, mistr's got you covered in three easy steps. 1. Sign up@mistr.com 2. Consult with a licensed doctor online and 3 complete your at home testing kit. Then your medication is delivered discreetly right to your door. It's safe, easy and completely judgment free. Protect yourself and protect each other. Sign up@mstr.com today when your schedule sounds like this. Are you kidding me? An oil change is the last thing you have time for, so drive into Take five and let our techs change your oil, check your tires, top off your fluids and have you back on the road. Pits stop fast all while you stay in your car. No putting your entire schedule on hold. No upsells, no problem. So you can get back to your to do list or not. Find your nearest shop@take5.com Take 5 the stay in your car 10 minute oil change support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors, llc. SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete Disclosures available at public.comDisclosures welcome to Ikarapin Here, a podcast about tariffs and how to justify them. I am your host Mia Wong and today we are talking about tariffs, the Supreme Court ruling, and how Trump is manufacturing a crisis to justify the next set of tariffs that he has imposed. Oh boy. So all right, to recap our last tariff segment so people understand what I'm talking about when I talk about the Supreme Court ruling from a few weeks ago. So Trump had been claiming the ability to do tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers act, an act that famously never says the word tariff. And the Supreme Court was like, no, actually the International Economic Powers act does not give you the power to levy tariffs, a thing that it does not say that you can do. So Trump got extremely mad about this and he imposed a 10% tariff across the board using a different law as he said he was going to do. Now this 10% across the board tariff was run through section 122 of the Trade act of 1974. We're going to get into that, okay, so he imposes a 10% tariff using this, like, different authority from section 122. And the next day he goes, I'm going to raise the tariff rate to 15%. And this is the tariff rate on the entire world. But then he just forgot to do it because he got distracted by, I think, invading Iran. So he has never actually, you know, raised the tariff rate to 15%, which he said that he had done. So it's now just at 10% on the entire world instead of, you know, all of the sort of individual country tariffs that have been in place before. And that's sort of the focus of today's episode is about these tariffs, because these tariffs are already being challenged in court. And I think that that challenge has a very, very good chance of winning fairly easily. And the reason that those tariffs have a very good chance of being overturned by the courts is that unlike the IEPA tariffs that he was using, where he was claiming illegally the authority to just do whatever he wanted, this is why you would wake up in the morning and there's like 100% tariff on China, like 700% tariff on Vietnam, blah, blah, blah, blah. Trump was claiming that that act let him do whatever he wanted. It did not. The court found that he did not. But that was how he was using tariffs, and it was the basis of how he was using tariffs for diplomacy. Right. You know, he would put a tariff on someone at random, claiming this power, and then he would, like, enter negotiations with them, and he can't do that anymore. Now what he's done in its place is, again, impose these tariffs using section 122 of the Trade Act. Now, this authority is very, very different than the authority Trump was claiming before. I'm just going to read it because it mostly explains itself. Do not worry about the international payment problems or balanced payments deficit that it mentions at the beginning. We're going to go over that in a second. What's important for our purposes here is that in order to put tariffs into effect whenever fundamental international payment problems require special import measures to restrict imports. One, to deal with large and serious United States balance of payments deficits, Two, to prevent an imminent and significant depreciation of the dollar in foreign exchange markets, or 3, to cooperate with other countries in correcting an international balance of payments disequilibrium, the President shall proclaim, for a period not exceeding 150 days, unless such a period is extended by an act of Congress, a temporary surcharge not to exceed 15% ad valorem in the form of duties in addition to those already opposed, if any, on articles imported into the U.S. okay, so let's look at the limits first. Right. Instead of any rate of tariff on any country, which is what Trump had been doing, section 122 only lets you set an up to 15% tariff on every country in the world and only lasts for 150 days unless Congress votes to approve it. This sets up a giant fight in Congress that Trump is not going to win. Now, we may never get to that point because the same right wing legal group who funded the lawsuit that overturned the IEPA stuff is going after section 122. And they're going to win now. They're going to win because section 122 has literally never been implemented before. The tariffs specifically never been implemented. And there is a reason for that. And the reason is that to even deploy Section 122 tariffs in the first place, you need fundamental international payment problems. One, to deal with large and serious United States balance of payments deficits, to print dollar depreciation, and cooperation with other countries to correct international balance of payments disequilibrium. So those are very specific conditions. What does that mean? What does it mean for there to be a problem with balance of payments? This requires us to understand what the fuck balance of payments is. And it is here where I am fulfilling my promise from that executive disorder episode where I said I would explain it in the full episode. All right, we're doing it and oh fucking boy, are you in for it because. Jesus Christ. Oh my God. Holy shit. This stuff is annoyingly convoluted, but it is also extremely important to how the global economy functions, how it's changed. And you know, it's not really relevant for the US at all for reasons we will get into, but it is extremely relevant for the economies of a bunch of developing countries. So, okay, let's start off with balance of payments. So what is the balance of payments? I'm just going to start off by quoting the St. Louis Federal Reserve. Balance of payments is a summary of all the transactions involving goods, services and investments between one country and all other countries over a given time. Any transaction that causes money to flow into a country is a credit to balance payment accounts, and any transaction that causes flows out is a debit. So this is a record of literally every purchase and capital movement that goes in and out of a country. Right? So it's goods, services, debt, payments and things can either be credits or debits, as the Fed explains. You know, things that are debits, Right? Things that like make your account go lower is, you know, debt payments, capital transfer payments, like buying imports. If you were importing stuff from China, that is a debit. And then there are things that are credits to make account go up. So that's other countries paying for exports, capital transfer receipts and you know, financial assets. That's other countries paying for your exports. So this is tracked in like two accounts. There's a capital and finances account. I'm just gonna call it the capital account because that's the most common name for it and it's shorter. So there's the capital account that is all movement of capital in and out of the country. And then there's a current account which is like a trade record of all goods and services. Technically there's also stuff from like interest from investment goes there, but we don't really care about that for our purposes. The current account is the account that's like trade. And then there's a capital account which is the, the account that's all of the capital moving in and out. Now importantly, these two accounts, right? These two accounts compose balance of trade, right? This, this record has two accounts in it. Those are the two accounts, if you line up all the credits and debits and then they cancel out and equal zero the value of all goods being imported or exported to services and stuff like that too is the same as the amount of capital moving in and out of the country that the two accounts will cancel out. And this is what's really confusing about balance of payments. Because why the fuck is that true, right? Why are the capital flows in trade balance? Why can't you have an imbalance? And the answer is that's how the accounting system works. And the reason the accounting system works like that is because of what balance of payments is. Now weirdly, if you want a more detailed explanation, there are a billion detailed explanations that are extremely convoluted and annoying. The Reserve bank of Australia weirdly has like a readable one for people who aren't like engrossed in financial stuff, however, come up. I'm going to try to explain it. So balance of payments is the record of everything that moves in and out of a country. You know, so that's goods, that's services, that's money, it's stocks. When I say it tracks everything, right? It was a record of everything, that means it's recording both sides of a transaction. So what does that mean? Okay, imagine a receipt, right? It's a receipt for a burger. You have bought one hamburger. On the receipt is the thing you bought, the burger and how much it cost, which is the money you pay for it. Balance of payments tracks both the burger and the money you paid for it because it tracks international trade, right? It's tracking international movement of stuff. And because both the burger and the money changed hands across borders, right? It tracks both of them. And that is why when you put all the credits and debits from both accounts together, it adds up to zero, right? Because you know, think, think about like the, the, the net transfer of funds on that burger, right? On the one hand there is the burger and on the other hand there is, you know, how much money you paid for the burger and those two things are equivalent, right? The value of the burger is how much it's worth. So okay, that means that in the accounting of it, right, the account on the receipt which shows both of these things is balanced because it's tracking both, right? And this is the same way it works for an investment. You buy shares of a company. So, okay, there's the money for the shares and the shares themselves and they're both being tracked and they both go into the record that balance of payments keeps. So there are some convoluted things about this and this is the reason why you need to combine both accounts instead of each account being balanced by themselves. Because sometimes the record of the burger goes in one account and the record of the money for that burger goes in a different account. This is convoluted. It's because of like how income is classified. It's a mess. You can go read the Reserve bank of Australia, but that's why you need both accounts together to get the balance of payments, right? Because both the burger and the money for the burger are in the balance of payments somewhere, but they might go in different accounts. So you need to put them together and that's how you get the balance of payments. And see, that's why it's called the balance of payments, right? They balance out. See now, now you're getting it. Now you're getting it. This is why it always balances out to zero, because it's the balance of both the money and the object, right? So sharp eared listeners may be going, wait, hold on. So section 122, which is where the tariffs are from, is about a deficit in the balance of payments. How can you have a deficit if it always balances out to zero? And the answer is, technically speaking, you can't. So okay, what the fuck is going on here? Why is Trump using, and Trump specifically is claiming that there's a balance of payments deficit and there's a crisis in order to impose these tariffs. So what is going on here? Why does this law exist? You will find out after these ads. Woo. Cliffhanger A. So to explain what is going on here, we need to take a detour back in time to when this was written. This act was written in 1974, but we need to go back a little further to 1971. Now, in 1971, Richard Nixon makes probably the most consequential, in a macro sense, change to, like, how currency functions on a global scale in probably half a millennia when he pulled the US off the gold standard. So what does this mean? It means that Nixon ended what was called dollar convertibility, or the ability to go to the government and trade your dollar for a certain amount of gold. So this fixes the value of the dollar to the value of gold. So the value of your currency is sort of relatively constant in that, like. Like it's this much gold. Right. But it means that your macroeconomic policy is constrained by your gold supply. So why did Nixon take the US off the gold standard? And what does this have to do with balance of payments? Surprisingly everything. So, okay, what I've been describing about balance of payments, I've been describing modern balance of payments. If you go back and read stuff from the Fed from this era, when they talk about balance of payments, they're talking about flows of gold. In this period, every dollar that leaves the country represents an amount of gold. And the more of it that leaves the country, the more pressure that puts on the US Gold reserves because, you know, there's less and less of it. This is what they're talking about when they talk about balance of payments right? Now, what's interesting here, and this is something that's important for our modern purposes, is that the problem that the US was facing in the 50s and 60s that causes Nixon to do this when they're talking about having balance of payments deficits, which they are in this period. Right? And this is why this law is written is because this is a period where this stuff is talked about. The problem isn't a trade deficit. Right? And this is very important. Trade deficits and balance of payments deficits, not the same thing at all. In fact, in this whole period, when the US Is running these massive balance of payments deficits to become a problem, they have a trade surplus, right? They have a trade surplus. So, like, okay, how are they, like, losing gold then? Right? Like, how are dollars flowing out of the country? Well, it turns out that what's actually making this a balance of account deficit, where, like, dollars are leaving the economy, which means Gold's leaving the US's vaults, is that the US is spending too much on its military. It's always military spending. It is always fucking military spending. Holy shit. It's the reason everything is broken. It's, it's, it's literally just always military spending. We're spending too much gold on the damn military. Right? So the deficit, and we're talking about a balanced payments deficit, the actual deficit is that in order to pay for wars and to do military bases, they are spending money in other countries. And this is technically like part of the balance of payments, right? Because it's money leaving the country. And you know, like, technically speaking, the balance of payments as we've been talking about it, right? Like the account is balanced, but we keep spending dollars in order to obtain military bases, and then also in order to bomb Korea and then Vietnam. And the dollars have to come from somewhere. Now, again, the dollar at this point is gold. It represents a fixed amount of gold that the U.S. has. And those dollars are coming from the U.S. government. So that, that's what the actual quote, unquote, deficit is in this case, right? You will see this described as like, oh, my God, they're paying for stuff from the current account, from the capital account. No, no, no. Technically, yes, but like, like what's actually happening here is that the us, right, it's gold leaving the country because the US is having to buy shit for military bases, Right? And it's not getting enough gold back from trade to replenish the amount of gold that the US is spending on these military bases. Now, in theory, this is fine because it's technically speaking you're spending dollars, and as long as no one tries to actually convert those dollars into gold, you'll be okay. Enter one Charles de Gaulle, President of France, who begins to en masse, convert American dollars into gold in order to end the dollar's reign as the world reserve currency. Because he was pissed off at the US running the world. This is not like Charles de Gaulle, anti imperialist. De Gaulle does not want, like, the end of imperialism. De Gaulle wants there to be equal footing or more equal footing between the different imperialist powers. Right? He just wants France to be like a major world power, imperialist power as well. Right? The power the US gets from being the world reserve currency is extremely important. So what is the reserve currency? The reserve currency is the currency that, like, all global trade is done in. And because it's the currency that all global trade is done in. All of the world's central banks have to hold like a bunch of that currency, right? And that, that's why it's called the reserv currency. But I say all of the world's central banks have to hold it, except for the United States, which does not have to hold dollars because it's our fucking currency. And if we want more, we can just print more, right? So this is technically called like seniorage privilege, but like the, the power of this right is enormous. And, and the, the, the dollar status as the reserve currency is actually really important to us in terms of explaining these sort of balance of payments deficits and crises. So, okay, here's the St. Louis Fed on why countries have to hold world reserve currencies. Governments and or central banks keep, you know, like reserve currency on hand for several reasons, including exchange management. Insurance against sudden loss of ability to pay for imports caused by a halt. Capital inflows such as foreign direct investment to the domestic market, foreign purchases of domestic stocks or bonds, or domestic borrowing from the rest of the world. Insurance for other economic contingencies such as wars or natural disasters. Now the second one is what's of concern to us, right? It's insurance against sudden loss of ability to pay for imports. And that's what's commonly known as a balance of payments crisis in the current day, when you run out of dollars to pay for your imports or to pay for your foreign debt, which is a real issue too, right? Usually your money goes to the foreign debt and then you're out of currency and then you can't, you know, like import more shit. This is a balance of payments crisis. And they're actually pretty common or decently common in a bunch of developing countries, and they are almost always completely catastrophic. It's one of the foremost causes of modern revolutions because when you have one of these balance of payments crises, you can't afford to fucking import things because you don't have enough dollars. You can't import oil or, you know, fertilizer or food because you don't have enough dollars to do it. And your government has gone through all of the dollar reserves. As I talked about in the ed, Sri Lanka is probably the most recent example. The country, you know, just ran out of dollars to purchase shit with. And the ensuing unbelievably hideous shit that everyone had to suffer through caused people to burn down the President's fucking mansion. You will know, and I said this before, you will know if the US has a balance of payments Crisis, because you will see the smoke and flames outside of your window. And it's not just like Sri Lanka, right? Like the revolution in Sudan. Like, the reason that there's a civil war in Sudan right now to some extent, is because of one of these crises that set off a revolution. Even though, you know what usually happens in these cases, right, is that a country has one of these crises and then someone, usually the International Monetary Fund, will give them a loan. And so they will give them dollars in exchange for, you know, like, turning the entire economy of that country into a debt servicing machine, which means, you know, like, taking food out of the mouths of babies to pay that debt back. And this also often causes revolutions, right? Like, like, so, like, Sudan had a balance of payments crisis in, like, 2018, late 2018, 2019, and they eventually got an IMF bailout deal. But, like, the price of bread increased by 250% and people drove Omar Al Bashir out of power. However, comma, you will note that I have been saying that these crises are caused because countries run out of dollars. But we can't run out of dollars because those are United States dollars. We can just fucking print them. We literally cannot have this kind of balance of payments crisis because it's all our own money and we can just print shit in our own money. Jesus Christ. This is so silly. Losing my mind. Like, just. It's not possible. You can't do it. Oh, my God. Now, however, why is the law like this, right? Like, why is there a law written talking about the US as if it could have a balance of payments deficit? It again, like, right up until 1971, when Nixon took the US off the gold standard, it actually was possible to, you know, make the US Run out of dollars because you could run out of gold. And this is what like, de Gaulle was trying to do, you know, by, like, making the US convert all his dollars into gold. But Nixon just said, fuck it, the dollar is a floating currency now. And since its value isn't pegged to a certain amount of anything else, right? And that's the way it's been ever since. We can't have these crises. Now, the countries that have these crises in modern day are ones that peg their currency to, like, a specific amount of dollars, right? And they tend to run out of their reserves trying to, like, stabilize the value of their currency by offering conversions of their currency into the dollar at the official rate by, like, letting people go convert their currency into dollars. But again, we can't have that because it's dollars. We Owe shit in dollars. And also in order to have like a full on balance payments crisis where you can't pay for things, right, it requires no one to be like willing to lend you money. And it's like, okay, like, who is not going to lend the United States of America money? Like, are you kidding me? This is, this is the fakest crisis of all time. This bill, however, was passed again in like 1974 and it was only three years after the US was off the gold standard. And so people were like, okay, we're going to do this thing in case we ever go back to a situation where this stuff is possible. But right now, like, we literally structurally cannot have a balance of payments crisis. Like, we can't have one. You can't have a balance of payments deficit. This is not the same as a trade deficit. Trump is trying to argue that. So we have a trade deficit. Our Currents account, which is like the trade account is like 4% below balance. But then if you look at the capital account and you put them together, it balances. Because that's just how it works. Oh, that means we're in trouble and. Nonsense. Absolutely. Bullshit. He's also claiming that there's like fundamental international payment problems which like. No, there aren't. Because fundamental international payment problems means you can't pay for your imports or like your debt. And if we weren't able to do that, you would all know. So they're going to lose this lawsuit because this is the fakest crisis that has ever existed. And now you know how fake it is and also what balance of payments is, you know. Okay, I'm going to close on a story about this which is that there is a scenario in which this knowledge has actually saved countries before. And specifically like the country that this saved was Cuba. There's like the Cuban revolution, right? And immediately after the Cuban revolution, the government, it's not like clear that they're communist yet. There's this very, very short window where it's like not quite entirely clear what the fuck is going to be going on with this new like Cuban government. And the government sends Che Guevara to the US to negotiate with a bunch of American banks, right? And Che Guevara actually understands this stuff, right? He knows what balance of payments is. He knows. He's able to like talk to all of the sort of Manhattan bankers who are talking about this stuff on their terms, right? And like they literally, literally the, the line they say about him is like, yeah, he talks like a banker, right? He understands balance of payments, he understands all of this stuff and what he's able to do, and this is critically like why the nation of Cuba, like, like why the Cuban revolution succeeded was that he was able to get the US to give him all of his gold. Like, because he was able to convince these bankers because he understood what they were talking about in their language. And he was able to convince the US government to get him all this fucking gold because he understood how this works. And that's why, like, Cuba was like functional as a country after that because they had managed to get all of their gold reserves which previously had been being held in the us. So you know, you never know when you too might be at the head of a better revolution or you might be the one person in the new revolutionary coalition who understands what balance of payments is. And you too can get your gold out of the United States before the government realizes that you're communists and like would have like locked it down and frozen it and taken the gold. So this is what it could happen. Here, the podcast that helps you take your country's gold reserves Like Che Guevara oh boy. No one knows what the future holds, but you deserve a weather app that can help. Weatherbug is easy to use and provides forecasts for your every need from storm warnings to pollen levels right at your fingertips. Get the fastest local Alerts and comprehensive 10 day forecasts wherever you are. Its hyperlocal real time customizable alerts. Make sure the weather never takes you by surprise so you can plan every day with confidence. Download the free Weatherbug app from the app Store today and start getting accurate weather forecasts 24. 7. Did you know you can get your prep for free? Prep is a once daily peel that's up to 99% effective at preventing the transmission of HIV. Mistra makes it easy and free to get started all online. No doctor's office and no paperwork. They also provide free Doxy Pep, a simple antibiotic you take after sex to help prevent certain STIs. Kind of like morning after pill for STIs. Whether you have insurance or not, mistr's got you covered in three easy steps. 1 Sign up at mistr.com 2. Consult with a licensed doctor online and 3 Complete your at home testing kit. Then your medication is delivered discreetly right to your door. It's safe, easy and completely judgment free. Protect yourself and protect each other. Sign up@mstr.com today when your schedule sounds like this. Are you kidding me? An oil change is the last thing you have time for, so drive into Take five and let our techs change your oil. Check your tires, top off your fluids and have you back on the road pit stop fast. All while you stay in your car. No putting your entire schedule on hold. No upsells, no problem. So you can get back to your to do list or not. Find your nearest shop@take5.com Take 5 the Stay in youn Car 10 Minute Oil Change Support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com podcast paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Service Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors llc, SEC Registered Advisor. Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures available at public.com disclosures. This is It Could Happen Here Executive Disorder Our weekly newscast covering what's happening in the White House, the crumbling world and what it means for you. I'm Garrison Day Davis. Today I'm joined by James Stout Robert Evans with a segment later on by Mia Wong. This episode we are covering the week of March 4 to March 11. Some small news items here at the top ahead of National Espresso Martini Day this Sunday, Buffalo Wild Wings is releasing a wing flavored Espresso Protini cocktail made with muscle Milk protein powder infused with the Buffalo Dry Rub which also coats the rim of the glass. I gotta say, when we stationed a reporter permanently at Buffalo Wild Wings headquarters, a lot of people said why not? Somewhere in one of the many war zones in the world, you know, why not? In Washington D.C. in the press corps and I shouted that person down until they cried. And today, today I've been proven right. We will be doing a detailed report on the Espresso Proteini next week. Anxiously awaiting the release of it this weekend. Yeah, I'm not touching that shit. Yes. I'm excited that they have finally decided to put muscle milk powder in an espresso martini. It's one of the foulest. Every word in this sentence gets worse. The dry rub, I think, is much more dangerous, frankly. It's the dry rub muscle milk combo. You're gonna be sneezing as you drink it. It's. Imagine if someone had just come out with spicy packs of muscle milk, like pre mixed muscle milk. That was unspicy. I'd be shocked if that didn't already exist, to be honest. I mean, it could. It kill you. It'll kill your toilet. What is beautiful to me, though, and what I should note this. This goes back to our sponsors, Buffalo Wild Wings caring very deeply about human beings. Muscle milk is in the bottom third of protein powders when it comes to lead exposure. Now, that's still more lead than you're supposed to have. Oh, good. They are the bottom third. It's one of the better ones. It's one of the better ones. A few other small news items. Erica Kirk has been appointed to the Air Force Academy Board of Visitors. Obviously, Erica, Air Force makes sense. Charlie Kirk also served on this board. And Ben Shapiro's eyebrows are not actually that big. Those videos are manipulated media. I saw those and I knew they were fake and chose not to prove to myself that they were fake because I needed something that day. But I guess I'm okay today. I haven't seen these. Oh, wow. No, I'm just seeing these for the first time. Wow. It's like a caterpillar has crawled up there. The beauty of how the meme worked is that I saw it for the first time right after waking up, and I was like, well, that's gotta be fake. And then I saw five more pictures of different pictures with the eyebrows. And so I got this beautiful moment. And it wasn't more than about a minute, but this moment of magic, like when you're a child on Christmas morning, like, this might be real. Maybe this is real. It's one of the more useful uses for AI. AI Generated or AI altered videos. It's turned me around. You can apply, like, the, you know, these. These very subtle changes to a lot of different videos fairly quickly. So it's not just one, you know, photoshopped or, like, you know, visual effects video. Yeah. But there's like five, you know, handheld cell phone videos that look pretty genuine, and if you just make enough of them, you're like, oh, this, this. This seems. This seems real. Yeah. And, I mean, Garrison, you're bringing up the part of this that actually is evidence of a danger, but let's all just enjoy this for just a second more. Okay, we're done. Hundreds of people have returned to Afrin after having been removed nine years ago, in some cases by Turkish proxy forces and the sna. Many of them will have returned to find their orchards and their homes destroyed, but at least now they can begin to rebuild. For an idea of how important Afrin was, like, one of the most common nom de guerres that I came across when talking to YPG and YPJ fighters was Haval Lafren. Like, it's a name that you pick because you're not going to use your real name as a revolutionary fighter. And a lot of people, some of them came from Afrin. Some of them was just a symbol of, you know, what the Kurds had lost due to Turkish military aggression. Yeah. But this is a very big deal for them. Yeah. It's like, I know I've been critical of stg, but, like, I'm glad to see this happening. Yeah. Also in Syria, Sipan Haemo has been appointed as a Deputy Minister of Defense for Eastern Syria, which would be, I guess, the way they're dividing up now would be the area which includes Syrian Kurdistan. And we just learned today, very sadly, that Saleh Muslim, who's one of the co chairs of the pyd, the Democratic Union Party, has passed away, which is, yeah, pretty sad. Rest in peace. Last week, the Department of Justice finally released some of the missing files related to four interviews from 2019 with a protected source who claimed that Epstein introduced her to Trump in the 80s when she was between the ages of 13 and 15, and that Trump sexually abused her. The newly released documents are FBI memos summarizing three interviews and a crisis intake form. Yeah, this victim received a financial settlement from the Epstein estate in 2021. And NPR found that there are still 37 missing pages related to these interviews. Yeah. It's also worth noting that the FBI is currently looking into Zorro Ranch, what was once Zorro Ranch in New Mexico. This was Jeffrey Epstein's New Mexico property. And it's where he talked a lot about when he would talk about his plans to, like, breed a bunch of children and stuff with his DNA or whatever. He, like, Zorro Ranch was the. The epicenter of this. And it's become clear in the documents release that in terms of the amount of trafficking and the amount of Abuse of trafficked children. That was done there at least equal to his island. Now, this ranch goes under a new name and it's owned by a new person. And we'll talk about who exactly that is in a second. But there were several attempts by local law enforcement to, like, investigate the ranch, particularly to dig for human remains, but those were kind of stymied by ongoing FBI investigations that seem very shady in retrospect, given how long they waited to look for bodies on the ranch. But they're doing that now. I don't know if they're going to find anything. A lot of the talk about bodies is in, like, individual anonymous reports. That said, I'm glad they're looking. They should be looking at this ranch. Yeah. And now I can give the promised punchline, which is that the current guy who owns Jeffrey Epstein's ranch is Don Huffines, who's running for state cop troller in Texas and who used to run one of the big dealerships in my childhood. Huffines has it in this case. Huffines might have evidence that Jeffrey Epstein murdered people. Great. Sorry. That is. That is bleak. Let's start with Kristi Noemi. As we reported last week, it looks like Christy Noem's time at the Department of Homeland Security is about to come to an end. It did seem that at the time that Trump announced this via Truth, Gnome was unaware of her removal. There's this footage of her speaking at an event. People become aware that she's lost her job, but shortly afterwards, she posted on x.com the everything website. Thank you at POTUS for appointing me as a special envoy for Shield of the Americas. When you see the Shields of the Americas, this is not. Christ. You know, when you see the Shield of the Americas website, you will be laughing then. At SecRubio and at SecWar are incredible leaders, and I look forward to working with them closely to dismantle cartels that have poured drugs into our nation and killed our children and grandchildren. There's a lot more in this tweet. Yeah. I appreciate how Trump congratulated Gnome on being an excellent secretary of in quotation marks. Homeland. Yes. Yes. Yeah, yeah. Good stuff. Yeah, it was great. There has been some speculation about Gnome being fired because of vehicles that she purchased for dhs. I've linked to a bunch of those contracts. I found the contracts. That money is relatively trivial when you look at the massive budget that they have. And I'm really not sure that this was a reason. And I've seen no evidence to suggest that it was. What I have seen is that Noam is going to be replaced by Mark Wayne Mullen. Mullin is a bombastic MAGA supporter. He's probably best known with trying to start a fight in Congress with Sean o' Brien and generally being an extremely loyal supporter of Trump in all cases apart from January 6, where for a while he supported prosecutions. Now he's much more like, equivocating on that. He also at one point attempted to set up his own Evacuation of U.S. citizens from Afghanistan during the Biden administration. He is an enrolled citizen of the Cherokee Nation, which, as I've commented before, has been the source of far too many Democratic critiques, which are really kind of disgusting and bigoted. Yeah. God, there are so many things to be upset about, Quinn Mullen about, and being Cherokee is not one of them. And like, policing how you think indigenous people should look or suggesting that, like, yeah, he doesn't fit your trope of indigenous people is in itself bigoted and offensive. Yeah. As a general rule, if you're, like, finding reasons or reading someone else who's finding reasons to say this person who has lived their entire life as a member of this tribe, isn't really that. That you're basing it on some form of racist US Government logic from one decade or another because it's changed over time as opposed to how the tribe actually considers membership. Right. Which. Yeah. Is it. I guess what should matter most. I don't. I shouldn't have an opinion on it either way. But yeah, it's not what you claim. It's who claims. You is the way I've had it. Right, right. Exactly. It's like the way family. I. I don't know. I shouldn't say anymore because it's not my fucking place. Yeah. And I wish other people would adopt the same science. Mullin is a really big borderhawk. He's been incredibly combative in Congress. I don't think that this will make DHS any less aggressive or violent. Clearly, Noem's tenure had become unpopular. Right. In the same way that Bavino had become unpopular. But I don't think this signals a dramatic change in DHS leadership towards respecting people's basic dignity and rights. Now, I want to talk a little bit about the Shield of the Americas. The program was announced last weekend at Tramps Golf Resort in Southern Florida. It currently has a webpage with a. A really incredible placeholder graphic. Maybe I should just share this if you go to shieldoftheamericas.site. i was. Yeah, I was wondering if that was a real website I think it is like, do we know that that's actually what they. So I. I'm a little unsure because I couldn't find like a government contract for like, the website hosting. Right. But I don't think I've ever found a government contract for website hosting. So it's a placeholder and then it has videos. If you click Access Content. It appears to be essentially like a Dropbox. Huh. For videos of the Shield of the Americas event. Yeah, it seems to be real. It does seem to be based on the inclusion of these videos. But the main page with the. With the little sh. That's definitely their logo. Yeah, it looks like it's from 2005 in the most enduring way possible. You know, someone booted up Microsoft Paint and went to town on this. Someone had graphic design as a passion. Yeah, yeah. It looks kind of GI Joe esque. It looks kind of like American Ninja Warrior esque. Yeah. Like, it's a very specific, like, era of design choices here. The Shield graphic. Yeah, it's fascinating. Much to discuss. Anyway, moving past the graphic, currently, the agreement, the Shield of the Americas agreement was signed by representatives from Argentina, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guyana, Honduras, Panama, Paraguay, Trinidad and Tobago, and the United States. Evidently, for those keeping track of countries in the Americas, this leaves Mexico, Brazil, Colombia and Venezuela, along with other Caribbean island nations. There was also a representative from Chile's President Elect who obviously couldn't sign because they don't have the authority. Already do so yet. What it seems to be is an extension of what we've seen already. Right. Of the. The quote unquote Don Row Doctrine. Can we just call it the Trump Doctrine? Why. Why do we got to do this? Why do we gotta do this? We. I think the Don Road Doctrine actually is the correct way to refer to it as I just. It. Trump himself has used it. And it annoys me. Yeah, unfortunately. So. Annoys me. Yeah, me both, buddy. I know it's what he calls it, but it annoys me. It's extremely unfortunate. I mean, but it also links it to an actual lineage of US Foreign policy behavior. Yes. Yeah, yeah. The Trump corollary to the Monroe Doctrine would perhaps have been a more conventional way. That would be the dignified way to refer to it. That would be the way like a historian would hope to refer to it. Yeah. Unfortunately, dignity is not a thing that is abounding at the this time. No, it's not. It's not. First is tragedy. Second is farce. Yeah. And then it's really big farce, I guess. The best way to explain Shield of America is to, is, is to explain the conference that was hosted the day before at Trump's golf resort, which was the Department of Defense, sometimes referred to as the Department of War, but not when they're talking about military action in Iran in which it's the Department of Defense again. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, because that's not a war. The, the DOD hosted the America's Counter Cartel Conference. The correct abbreviation according to the Secretary of defense is AC3. Just so you know. And I think it's best to explain this with the strikes that were carried out just a few days before this. Right. On the 3rd of March in the 6th of March Southcom. So that, that would be the. The US Regional Command, which encompasses South America and Central America, announced it had a quote, launched operations against quote, designated terrorist organizations in Ecuador. We saw videos of like these very small, very isolated jungle outposts being struck. And then we saw videos of helicopters deploying troops who did not appear to be United States troops. It is unclear exactly like what the munitions or what the thing doing the, the strike at the start of those videos were. But it seems that the US is working at the very least with Ecuadorian troops. Potentially the US is just there to quote, unquote, train, advise and assist. Right. But it signals a much more like violent approach to this anti cartel mission. Yeah. In this case the two groups Los Choneros and Los Lobos, they were both listed as foreign terrorist organizations and specially designated global terrorists in September of last year. I haven't seen that link made anywhere else explicitly in reference to this strike. But the fact that they used. They didn't use FTO in the statement. Right. They used dto Designated Terrorist Organizations. And there are a few different ways an organization can be designated as a terrorist. But given that there are two that are listed as FTOs and that those two are the most acquisitive in the region, I think we can assume that that's who it was against. They also added the Clan Del Golfo. Right. The, the Golf Cartel would be how people refer to it in English in December of 25 to the FTO list. I didn't pick this up at the time and again I haven't seen a great deal of reporting on it. The reason this concerns me is that it pertains to the TRIG Bar Terrorism Related Inadmissibility Guidelines. The TRIG bar can bar people from being admissible to the United States and it could be a serious barrier to migrants. Organizations can be considered terrorists for the purpose of the Trig Bar if they are not FTPs. But the addition of the the Gulf Cartel to the FTO list will make it very hard for people seeking asylum in the United States who have crossed Sudarion, because it is not possible for them to do that, at least if they are coming from south to north, which was the duration of travel until 2025, without transiting Gulf Cartel territory. And it would not be possible for that to happen without interacting with them in some way. And so this is potentially very concerning. I want to do more reporting on the Trig Bar. I am pursuing that with some public records requests, which will just take some time. Trump has very clearly made the link between this coalition and the much larger international coalition against the Islamic State. I've said this before, but he clearly sees Operation Inherent Resolve as a very successful model for foreign policy. Yeah, I especially think the model of the it was called Talent Anvil, but the strike cell that they had in Syria is one that he thinks is a very successful model. I've written about this. I'll link to a piece I wrote about this in my newslet. But Robbie, do you want to go ahead there? Yeah, I mean, I should start with a little update on our ongoing story, which is that America is out of bullets or running out of bullets. Not literal bullets. There's plenty of those. Yeah, lots of those in America. But. But the actual munitions that we use to intercept both drones and ballistic missiles. Now, a couple of things have happened since the start of our war with Iran. We've moved a significant chunk, if not the absolute majority, it's a little unclear, of the anti missile and anti drone weaponry, the major stuff that we had protecting other parts of the world that the United States has bases in, like South Korea, over to the Middle east and over to intercept Iranian missiles primarily headed either toward US Forces or most often to Israel. But even with all of the shit that we've redeployed from other areas, there's only so many of the munitions that we use because they're very expensive. And particularly the drones that are on Iran is using, like the Shahid drones, are very cheap. So starting at kind of the start of hostilities, we were looking at about 6.7% Iranian drones got through, the intercept got through. And this is just in the uae, but you can assume that it's fairly accurate to other theaters. Right. Because we have a lot of missile defense and a lot of drone defense in the UAE. So at the start of hostilities, about 6.7% of Iranian Shahid drones were getting through the UAE's defenses. Stop it. Huh? There is a thing, Robert, that younger people do. Yes, the six, seven thing. Yes, I know. It's funny. Iran did that just for the Zoomers or the Jin Alphas. Whatever. Anyway, that's February 28th. By March 10th, more than 25% of Iranian drones are getting through UAE's interception defense. Oh, wow. There hasn't been a massive change in the rate of ballistic missile interceptions yet, which suggests that at least we're not running on empty. But that's not good. Yeah, right. That's a massive change. Like, that's a massive issue. So we'll continue. I'll be doing a whole episode on how the US Is running out of bullets, bullets being, you know, a stand in term for more advanced munitions. But I've got something else to talk about right now that's also involved in the Iranian theater. Particularly. I'm going to talk about mines in the Strait of Hormuz. Let's do some ads for products that you may not be able to buy if naval traffic is interdicted through the Strait of Hormuz. So buy them now. So get them now, folks. So there's evidence that's come out kind of in the last couple of days. I start broken on the New Republic, but I believe CBS News was the origin point that Iran started laying mines in the Strait before Donald Trump publicly declared he was going. He wanted to take it over. Yeah. So basically, after we killed a huge chunk of the Iranian government, Trump started publicly musing, maybe we'll just take over the Strait of Hormuz and Iran started mining the shit out of it. Yeah. Now, now this is a problem for a lot of reasons. For one thing, the Strait is probably the most. I mean, it's. It's arguably the most important energy transit point on planet Earth. Right. Like, it's about a fifth of all crude oil shipments go through the strait. Yeah, that's not the only thing that goes through there, but it is. An incredible amount of the world's crude oil supply travels through this strait. And Tehran's always kind of had the option of closing it by just dumping a bunch of mines in there. Mines are incredibly cheap. You can drop mines from very small boats. The US Navy is very good at blowing up big boats. But if you have a shitload of small boats that have a shitload of mines, it's basically impossible to stop an adversary like Iran from laying a fuckload of mines. And that will make it basically untenable financially for anyone to run oil through the Strait. If you never know if one of your boats is gonna get hit by a fucking sea mine, it makes it hard to get insured to run a boat through the Strait of Hormuz. Most of these mines are not capable of. I mean, these mines in general are not capable of destroying the kind of bolt collars that move crude through. They're not going to blow the boat out of the water immediately, but they're going to damage it. And they have a very good chance because these boats are filled with crude fucking oil, of lighting them on fire. And that causes a serious problem for the crew of any boat. I want you to. I shouldn't have to explain why that creates a serious problem for the crew of any boat that's filled with crude oil. Right. It's pretty obvious. Once it became clear that Iran started laying, had started laying mines in the strait, U.S. forces claimed to have sunk 16 minelayers. That was from U.S. cENTCOM, although it's kind of unclear because at least half of those seem to have been inactive at the time. So these may have just been bigger mine layers that we hit at the start of our attacks on their navy. And then when we realized there's going to be a news cycle about mines in the strait, let's claim, you know, whatever. After it came out that Iran had in fact been laying mines, President Trump truthed. We want them removed immediately. If for any reason mines were placed and they are not removed forthwith. I've never heard him use forthwith before. That's what he want for him. Yeah, yeah, yeah. The military consequences to Iran will be at a level never before seen. If, on the other hand, they remove what may have been placed, it will be a giant step in the right direction. That sounds kind of desperate, and it sounds kind of desperate because the United States is in a uniquely dogshit position to deal with sea mines. Right. Specifically now. Yeah, we made a really funny decision, and by we, I mean the Trump administration made a really funny admin decision basically immediately before we declared war on Iran. A country we've known has always threatened to mine the Strait of Hormuz every time we fucked with them. And that funny decision was in January. The Navy decommissioned four Avengers class mine countermeasure ships, which were the last mine countermeasure ship we had in the Persian Gulf. Now we have other boats that we're pretty sure can do the job, but we've never tried. And the funny thing about the boats that we're currently going to be using to take out mines is that they're preexisting boats that were not built to take out mines. We basically have like, I think they're called like operations packages that you add to the boat to add capabilities. One of the capabilities, they have these little like basically drone torpedo things that can go out and seek out mines. They've got an enhanced like radar package, I guess, or whatever. They're better at looking for mines because the boats that they added these packages to were not initially meant for de mining. They're littoral combat ships. Lcss, widely considered to be the worst boats in the entire U.S. navy. In fact, in the Navy, the acronym LCS stands for Little crappy ship ships because they're bad. They've been very bad at basically every time we have like tested how will these things function in a real fight, the answer has been like, terribly. They're not good ships. They kind of suck ass. Now we'll see if the mind countermeasures that they put on these boats make them superior to the old Avenger class. However, there's a lot of issues with the mine countermeasure packages that they've been making for for these. And I want to read a quote from an article published by famous leftist and thus untrustworthy news source the U.S. naval Institute. Quote. Initially set for an initial operational capability in 2015, the MCM package went through a development process punctuated by stops and program failures. For example, the first craft that could tow the AQS20 sonar to hunt the bulk of mines suffered reliability problems and was scrapped. The service also canceled a plan for the MH 60s to tow the AQS 20. After years of program changes, the packages coalesced around a few core main systems. So the development of these MCM mission packages has been troubled for a very long time, which is what delayed the retirement of the Avenger class minehunters previously. And the Navy's now saying they totally work now and we're all gonna find out in real time if they do sick. And the last funny thing I have to say is the four decommissioned Avenger anti mining ship, two of them at least have hilarious names. Two of them make sense. One of them was the USS Sentry. Perfectly reasonable name for a demining ship. The other was the USS Dexterous. Kind of a weird name, but whatever. And then you have the USS Devastator and the USS Gladiator. What is a mine ship? Devastate. It's a. It's for Dema. It's to stop things from getting devastated. Anyway, that's my report. Okay. Good to know. And let's pick up with Iran. I want to start by talking about the speculation regarding partner forces. I think some of it has been just, like, a little bit misinformed. Start with. People have been talking about the Balochistan Liberation Army. They were only added to the United States FTO list last summer, which leads me to believe that the Trump administration is not positively disposed towards them. Right. Like, if they've just put them on the FTO list in August of last year, what are the odds anyone in that administration knows where Balochistan is? Yeah. It happened shortly after they killed some. Some Pakistani military personnel. So I'm guessing that. Yeah. Just got asked to do it or it was part of a negotiation. Yeah. Yeah. It also seems very unlikely that Trump is now willing to back a Kurdish land incursion. Invasion wouldn't be the right word. Kurdish people going into Kurdistan. It's not an invasion. I have a short video here for about kind of an autonomous region, as they did in Syria and Iraq. We're not happy. We're not looking to the Kurds going in. We're very friendly with the Kurds, as you know, but we don't want to make the war any more complex than it already is. We don't want. Yeah, I, I have ruled it out. I don't want the Kurds going in. I don't want to see the Kurds get hurt, get killed. We've had a good relationship. They're willing to go in, but we really. I've told them I don't want them to go in. Do you think the map of Iran will. I just think it's. The war is complicated enough without having. Yeah, sure. You wouldn't want the war to get complicated. Yeah. Also the, the audio quality on Fox News, they're absolutely atrocious. Yeah. It's hard in those planes sometimes. Yeah, yeah, yeah. They're in a difficult situation. Yeah. So I've spoken to a couple of these Kurdish groups that people have been speculating about in. In the last couple of weeks. Here's part of a statement that I received from the Pak. That's the Kurdistan Freedom Party. That refers to the US's vacillation on supporting them. Quote, the United States is working in the best possible way to dismantle the Iranian regime and eliminate terrorism in the region. For over three decades, we have been fighting to expel the IRGC from Kurdistan and liberate our land. Therefore, we cannot and must not base our policies on the shifts in US rhetoric. America has its own plans regarding the overthrow and subsequent administration of Iran. And we have our plans for the liberation administration of. Roger. Roger La refine to Eastern Kurdistan there. Yeah. Meanwhile, of course, for the last week, we've seen consistent bombing of Iran, including the targeting of oil and water infrastructure. Hengor is reporting horrible overcrowding and food shortages, as well as increased militarization of the Ghazal Hazar prison, which holds more than 16,000 people. As I highlighted last week, Iran was in a water crisis before this new campaign began. Hitting water infrastructure will only increase the odds of massive human suffering and death. This is especially true as it seems that Trump is somewhat growing tired of the war with Iran. He said in a press conference this week it would be, quote, inappropriate to target the newly chosen supreme Leader of Iran. In the same press conference, Trump also repeated his claim that Iran was going to take over the Middle east and would have had a nuclear weapon within a matter of weeks if it were not for last year's Operation Midnight Hammer. He also talked about an Iranian nuclear site, quote, protected by granite. Both Fordo and Natanz were struck last year and have underground elements. Fordo is about 80 meters below ground. Yeah. And that was a site that, like, required a US Strike. Israel did not have the means to knock that one out. But to the best of my knowledge, Fordo is now out of commission following the strikes in Operation Midnight Hammer, which happened in 2025. So perhaps he's referring to another subterranean site, or perhaps he's. He's confusing this with. With earlier information. Evidently, you can't just destroy uranium. Right. Like, if there is enriched nuclear material, then that is still there. Well, yeah, we talked about this the last time. But, like, the thing that's time consuming is enriching the uranium. And there's no evidence that any of this has reduced the amount that Iran has access to. Yes, exactly. And according to Senator Chris Murphy, it doesn't seem like that is particularly the target of this campaign. He said most of the targets are conventional weapons facilities, like drones and missile facilities. The Iranian navy, as Robert mentioned, ancient air force. It does not seem like they're particularly interested in regime change. And as Robert mentioned, the IRGC is still able to use many of its small civilian vessels, fast attack vessels and drones. I spoke to quite a few people who are in this sort of shipping security world, and one of their concerns is, like, when they say fast attack vessels, they're talking about very small boats with mounted machine guns. Right. Operating in large groups and swarming tankers or other ships going through the Strait of Hormuz, which would be quite challenging to defend ships from, especially if they're like large civilian ships. Right. I know some people have been speculating about the CM302 missiles that Iran ordered from China. Those are like, quote, unquote, carrier killer missiles. I don't believe they have those yet, though. If they do, we'll probably find out soon enough. Yeah. Boy, that would be a big day. Things would get quite bad if that happened. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I honestly, like, that might be for this administration, a tactical nuclear scenario. Like, it would be an unprecedented loss. They'd have to do something insane to save face. Yeah. I assume US carriers have means of defense as opposed to. They're very hard to kill. Yes. Yeah. That's a particular matchup that no one has seen yet because no one has been wild enough to try it. Yeah. They say these are carrier killers. They're theoretically carrier killers. A lot of the defensive systems on carriers as regards missiles like that are theoretical, too, because it hasn't happened. Yeah. Not many people have aircraft carriers. And the people who do, you don't want to piss off. Finally, I guess I want to talk about the Senator Blumenthal who raised the alarm in a congressional briefing this week. Here's a clip. I emerged from this briefing as dissatisfied and angry, frankly, as I have from any past briefing in my 15 years in the Senate. I am left with more questions than answers, especially about the cost of the war. My questions have been unanswered and I will demand answers because the American people deserve to know. And I guess I am most concerned about the threat to American lives of potentially deploying our sons and daughters on the ground in Iran. We seem to be on a path toward deploying American troops on the ground in Iran to accomplish any of the potential objectives here. And there is also, as disturbingly as anything else, the specter of active Russian aid to Iran putting in danger American lives. The last part references reporting that came first from the Washington Post. Russia is providing targeting info to Iran, chiefly using its advanced satellite imaging capacity. To quote from the piece, quote. Since the war began on Saturday, Russia has passed around the locations of US military assets, including warships and aircraft. This might explain how Iran has been able to hit some softer targets, like the temporary structure in Kuwait where at least six people were killed. And we've now learned that many more people were seriously injured, as well as hitting some over their horizon radar systems that we spoke about last week. Finally, the US is carrying out operations against Hasht Al Shaabi popular mobilization forces in Iraq this is getting a lot less reporting, but it seems like if there are boots on the ground anywhere right now, this would be where they would be. Right. They're using things like Apaches and A10s. They're not using standoff munitions delivered from a, from a great distance. And so anything that is likely to result in either needing people to spot targets or needing people to rescue a pilot if a plane or a helicopter gets shot down would more likely at this point be there in Iraq. That's about all I have. We'll go on one more ad break and return with a special segment from Mia Wong. Do we need to intro the music? If you want to play the music, you can't. Rocking chasma. Rocking chasma. Tyree. On to the economy, we have been seeing over the past week what I would effectively describe as a will they, won't they with are the stock markets going to collapse where markets have imploded and then immediately rebounded? Basically in line with Trump saying that the war is going to be over very soon. This was the sort of state of things on Monday. You know, there had been massive collapses in the Asian market from rising oil prices. And then Trump said that, quote, the war is very complete, pretty much in a phone interview with a journalist from NBC. And this caused a resurrection of the markets. Now this is completely disconnected from the actual reality of the war and functioned entirely to again, just calm these markets on Tuesday. So that was Monday. On Tuesday, Trump said in a speech, quote, we've already won in many ways, but we haven't won enough. We go forward more determined than ever to achieve ultimate victory that will end this long running danger once and for all, which. Okay, that's, that's gibberish. Now, Trump has specifically begun to address the fact that, again, you can't move oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz because Iran is going to just carry out strikes on them. He said, quote, we're also focused on keeping energy and oil flows to the world. And I will not allow a terrorist regime to hold the world hostage and attempt to stop the globe's oil supply. And if Iran does anything to do that, they'll get hit at a much, much harder level. I will take out those targets that were easy and that I mentioned before will take them out so quickly they'll never be able to recover, ever. If they want to play that game, they better not play that game. In the long run, oil supplies will be dramatically more secure without the threat of Iranian ships, drones, missiles, nuclear menace or anything. So what he's saying here is that if Iran keeps the strait closed, he's going to destroy them. But A, he's already in a war with them, and B, this just means that as long as Iran keeps the straight closed, then the war keeps going, which keeps the straight clothes longer, which keeps the war going. So this is, this is great. Trump was also directly asked by a reporter about whether the war is going to keep going. Quote, thank you. Thank you, Mr. President. You said the war is, quote, very complete, but your defense secretary says this is just the beginning. So which is it? And how long should Americans be prepared for this war to last for? And he immediately starts going into metaphysics, says, quote, well, I think you could say both the beginning. It's the beginning of building a new country. And then he eventually says, so, you know, you could look at that statement. We could, we could call it a tremendous success right now as we leave here, I could call it. Or we could go further, and we're going further. But the big risks on that war have been over for three days. We wiped them out in the first few days. So that says nothing other than probably the war is going to keep going. Now, Trump has been claiming there would be Navy escorts through this Strait of Hormuz. This is an absolute unhinged lie that Trump came up with to calm oil prices. And on Wednesday, we had reporting from Reuters that obviously, no, the Navy has been turning down requests for escort. I'm going to read a quote from that Reuters piece. Quote, the US Navy has refused near daily requests from the shipping industry for military escorts through the Strait of Hormuz since the start of the war on Iran, saying the risk of attacks is too high for now, according to sources familiar with the matter or which. Yeah, no, shit, of course this isn't happening. There's no way for it to happen. Have you seen an oil tanker? The largest of these things is 2/5 of a kilometer long, right? And some of them are, you know, half that size. So they are like one fifth of a kilometer long. But you can't escort that through a strait that is, and I can't emphasize this enough, 23 miles wide, its narrowest point. Now, Iran has also started mining the straits to some extent. On Wednesday, Trump claimed the Navy had destroyed Iran's mining ships and the strait was safe to cross. Iran immediately proved this to be a lie by hitting a whole bunch of oil tankers in various places around the Gulf. And this is, you know, one of one of the substantive issues with trying to get one fifth of like the world's oil supply through this gulf on top of. And also, and again like this is being reported a little bit less. But we talked about this in my episode earlier in the week week. It's not just oil. It's things like critical chemical components for fertilizer that comes through here. It's natural gas. It's also helium, which is a very, very critical element for a whole bunch of heavy industry that is actually very scarce. And a huge amount of the world's helium supply has to travel through the gulf. And there are so many kinds of munitions besides mines that Iran can use to hit boats, from rockets to missiles to drones just shooting at them with the guns on boats, the thing they've apparently done now. Now, Trump also said that he was waiving oil related sanctions on certain countries to reduce prices. It's not clear what this means. It's probably Russia. Reuters has claimed that it's about the US Temporarily allowing India to purchase Russian oil that's been like stranded at sea. It's very unclear what's going on there. On Thursday we got, we got a bunch of claims from the administration that escorting tankers through the strait was their plan the whole time, which no, it wasn't. This is just going to continue to be an absolute nightmare because if Trump can't figure out a way to get oil through there, he's either going to have to end the war or the world economy is going to just implode. Yeah, we'll be tracking that situation. There's also another crisis that has begun to brew which is the crisis in the so called private credit market, which is this is stuff that used to be called shadow banking. I'm going to go into more detail on this later as it becomes more and more sort of relevant. But private credit shadow banking is a series of things that are like a bank, but they're not regulated. So we're talking about trillions of dollars of assets. There has been a huge run basically on the shadow banks to the point where several very large banks have paused the ability to take money out of them. Now it's difficult to report on this because we don't actually know anything about how many people are pulling their money out or what the effect on this is because there are no reporting requirements because these are shadow banks. And the whole point about them is that they're not subject to the regular regulations that regular banking will be subject to. So that's another looming economic crisis that we're all sort of just going to have to deal with on top of Trump attempting to sort of destroy the economy with this war in Iran. And finally, I want to close by talking about a very good piece in Crimethink called History Is Repeating Itself, a Lebanese perspective on the war in Palestine, Lebanon and Iran. That is an interview with friend of the show Ilya Ayyub, talking about a part of this war that hasn't basically ignored in the media, which is, to quote Elia, Israel has ordered the forced evacuation, effectively the ethnic cleansing of the entirety of southern Lebanon, the ha and parts of. Becca. This has been a horrifying campaign that has involved Israel bombing major Lebanese cities, including repeated bombings of Beirut, as well as the systematic destruction of Lebanese villages by the Israeli army in the areas they've occupied in the south. The Israeli invasion has killed 600 people in Lebanon so far, and that number will be higher by the time you're listening to this. This campaign does not seem to have an endpoint and is continuing as the American and Israeli war in Iran also continues to grind on. Yeah, put a trans girl on your couch. Thank you, Mia. I have a few more news stories before we close out this episode. Trump has delayed his endorsement in the Republican Texas primary to build pressure on the Senate to pass the SAVE act, the Voting Restrict Restriction act, to gain favor with the president. Ken Paxton has announced he'd back out of the race if the Senate passes the SAVE act, which Trump later called his number one priority. Paxton knows that the passing of the act is very unlikely, but by signaling support for the president's number one priority, he's hoping to gain favor and maybe even steal the endorsement away from Cornyn or convince Trump not to give an endorsement, which would would help him in the runoff election. Okay. Politico has reported that Trump was, quote, irritated when news articles from Axios and the Atlantic published Wednesday declaring that Trump was, quote, unquote, expected to endorse Cornyn. According to a Republican operative, Trump and others in his orbit hate when stories get out ahead of official announcements. Unquote. I sympathize with the president here. I am also often irritated by news articles from Axios and the Atlantic. Yeah, yeah, aren't we all? That's the thing that bring us together as a country, right? It will be interesting to see what Trump does here. I mean, Trump has previously called Cornyn like a rhino. And Paxton is way more popular with the mega base, despite having more electoral liabilities for the general election. Yeah. On March 5th, seven of the biggest tech companies signed President Trump's ratepayer protection pledge, empowering the private sector to build their own power infrastructure like power plants, microgrids and substations, while also agreeing to, quote, bring or buy new generation resources and cover the cost of all power delivery infrastructure upgrades required for their data centers, ensuring such expenses are not passed to American households, unquote. And that is per the White House. So this expounds on the Right Player Protection pledge that Trump announced during his State of the Union address. We have a little bit more details now. Yeah. That the pledge has been signed by Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, Oracle and Xai. These companies will, quote, unquote, voluntarily negotiate new separate rate structures with utilities and state governments wherever they build new data centers, and will, quote, commit to pay these rates for the power and related infrastructure brought online to service their data centers, whether they use the electricity or not, unquote, to prevent blackouts and power shortages. The pledge also promises that AI companies and hyperscalers will also, quote, coordinate with grid operators to make backup generation resources available at times of emergency, contributing to a more reliable grid, unquote. This pledge is not legally binding, but like I said, it will empower the private sector to develop power plant infrastructure. Great. Scary. Last Saturday, March 7, white supremacist Jake Lang organized a protest outside of the New York City mayor's residence Gracie Mansion, dubbed Stop the Islamic takeover of New York City. Stop New York City Public Muslim prayer, unquote. Incredibly frustrating guy. Yeah, I know that's his goal, but, like, very frustrating. Well, he's. He's high off the fact that he was able to ignite a news cycle by lying about shit. Yeah. After getting chased out of Minneapolis by people with water pistols and rescued by a trans lady. Yeah. Now, during this protest on Saturday, two teenagers who traveled from Pennsylvania, Amir Bilat and Ibrahim Kayumi, allegedly attempted to detonate two improvised explicit devices amongst the protesters. And after being apprehended, both suspects stated allegiance with ISIS. According to U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Jay Clayton, the homemade explosive devices were mason jar sized and packed with metal shrapnel and contained the high explosive tatp. Oh, wow. One IED was ignited and thrown towards a group of protesters. Another was dropped in front of several NYPD officers, but neither device successfully detonated. It is hard to make bombs. That is why very few domestic terrorists in the US Go the bomb route. Yeah. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche claimed that the bombers, quote, allegedly sought to inflict mass casualties in service to ISIS with the hope of exceeding the carnage of the Boston Marathon bombing, unquote. Balot was asked if he wanted to accomplish something akin to the Boston bombing during interrogation, to which he allegedly replied, no, even bigger. It was only three deaths, unquote. During interrogation, Koumi stated that he had watched ISIS propaganda videos on his phone. The criminal complaint says that on route to the NYPD precinct, Balat told officers, quote, this isn't a religion that just stands. When people talk about the blessed name of the prophet, we take action. If I didn't do it, someone else will come and do it. And he later pledged allegiance to the Islamic State in writing, along with the phrase, die in your rage. The only thing weird about it is that there's not a whole lot of that going on right now. But this is very similar to the people who are carrying out sympathetic ISIS attacks, you know, during the height of military action in Mosul. Same. Same diff. Yeah. Yes, Deb, the timing is odd. Unusual. Yeah. Given we're past. Past the territorial caliphate, et cetera. They have been propagandizing a bit more in the last five, six months. Yeah. No, and it makes sense that they'd choose this as a target. Yeah. But thankfully, again, most people who try to make bombs fail. And that was the case this time, too. Yeah. For our last main story. Since the war on Iran began, the Trump administration has increasingly been talking about Cuba as being the next target of US Intervention. In the immediate aftermath of military strikes in Iran, the Atlantic reported that Trump is eyeing Cuba as the next target, with an administration official saying, the President is feeling like I'm on a roll, like this is working, unquote. In a CNN interview about U.S. military success in Iran last Friday, Trump started talking about Cuba, saying, quote, cuba is gonna fall pretty soon, by the way. Unrelated, but Cuba is gonna fall too. They want to make a deal so badly. They want to make a deal. And so I'm gonna put Marco over there and we'll see how that works out, unquote. That same day in Florida, Trump was asked about this Cuba deal and what it would mean for the US and it may be a friendly takeover, it may not be a friendly takeover. It wouldn't matter because they're really in. They're down to, as they say, fumes. They have no energy, they have no. No money. They're in deep trouble on a humanitarian basis. And we don't want to see that may or may not be a, quote, unquote, friendly takeover. Uh huh. Yeah. I mean, I don't think that's really an option. Yeah, it sounds like he's threatening Batista too, basically. Even going back further than that. But, yeah. Does he consider Venezuela to have been a friendly takeover? Like, because he's very friendly with Delsey now. Right. Like, you can see her tweeting all the time about their great partnership. I think he would consider that an unfriendly takeover, which has now become friendly. But I, I think he's, like, referring to the amount of, like, actual, like, you know, kinetic force as a part of a takeover versus just a diplomatic deal done by Rubio. But in, in his scene, an interview from, from Friday, Trump did specify that the administration is, quote, unquote, really focused on Iran right now and that they have, quote, plenty of time. But Cuba's ready after 50 years. I've been watching it for 50 years, and it's fallen right into my lap because of me, unquote. The day before this, Trump mentioned how Rubio wants to finish up operations in Iran before trying anything in Cuba. Quote, we could do them all at the same time, but bad things happen. If you watch countries over the years, if you do them all too fast, bad things happen, unquote. Do them. Do the countries. Do them. Yeah, I see. Fascinating. That's the reference to these regime change, decapitation, doing the country. Yeah, right. Got it. Good to know. At a presentation for the Shield of the Americas on Saturday, Trump said, quote, as we achieve a historic transformation in Venezuela, were also looking forward to the great change that will soon be coming to Cuba. Cuba's at the end of the line. They have a bad regime, unquote. It is wild to see him just like, I don't want to be like, you know, look, Babe Ruth used to point to where he's going to hit the baseball. This is. That's probably not the best analogy there, you know, I mean, it is bonkers just to see. They're very confident right now. Yeah, yeah, yeah. They haven't gotten a serious pushback. You know, we're starting to see gas prices rise, the cost of living is going to rise, but we haven't suffered any sort of major military loss. And eight Americans have died in the operations against Iran. Right. Like, yeah. And I doubt Trump has noticed, but, I mean, for him, that's not serious. It's not. No. He seems to have literally shrugged it off almost in press conferences. We did learn today that a great deal more people suffered more serious injuries than we thought in that particular drone strike in Kuwait Rate. But there won't be electoral consequences. Right. I think that's one of the reasons why they like these airstrike heavy, very light ground footprint models. Yeah. Because it's not Americans who die. No. It's Iranians who are primarily dying. Yeah, yeah. Shall we close with this brief discussion on ProtonMail? Yeah. It's important. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So last week, 404 Media reported that the end to end encrypted email service ProtonMail, quote, helped FBI unmask anonymous stop cop city protester, unquote, that is their headline. So what happened here is that In January of 2024, the FBI sent Swiss authorities a mutual legal assistance treaty request for information tied to the defend the Atlanta forestrotonmail.com account. The FBI believed that whoever had access to this email would likely have administrative access to the now defunct Scenes from the Atlanta Forest blog, which hosted sabotage report backs, calls to action and some instructional information on possible criminal acts people could commit. After Swiss authorities verified the FBI's request, ProtonMail was legally required to submit payment data which identified a name tied to the account through a credit card. Swiss authorities then forwarded that information to the FBI via the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty. This individual has not been charged with a crime and no email contents were provided to either the Swiss authorities or the FBI. This is Edward Schoen, the head of communications for Proton. Quote, Proton only provides the limited information that we have when issued with a legally binding order from Swiss authorities, which can only happen after all Swiss legal checks are passed. This is an important distinction because Proton operates exclusively under Swiss law. Proton accepts payments via cryptocurrency, cash and also credit card. If you use a credit card, we do have access to the payment identifier, which can be used to identify the credit card holder from the card issuer. We check all legal orders received from authorities and we understood that a law enforcement officer was shot and explosive devices were involved. And we verified that Swiss legal requirements were met, unquote. That's their main statement regarding the handover of this credit card information. This has always been my understanding of how ProtonMail works. They are a business. They are not an activist organization. They are. They are a business. And Swiss privacy laws are stronger. And they would have not been able to hand over financial information identifying the person if this account paid in cash mailed to Proton or via cryptocurrency, which would have been way more difficult to identify depending on the crypto. But yeah, I've operated many, many ProtonMail accounts through the years. I've never tied any of them to financial information. You do not need to pay for most of the services that they provide. Like, I even have Proton VPN without paying for, like the expanded VPN option. Yeah. They've always been very clear that they're a Swiss based company and they comply with Swiss privacy law. Yeah. This has happened before. They have responded to FBI requests before. I don't know how many FBI requests they have responded to. I know they've responded to requests from other countries in Europe. There's one around 2020. I know they respond to French authorities about environmental protesters. The fact that Swiss authorities did send send this information to FBI is newsworthy. This is notable. But this doesn't mean that Proton is getting increasingly compliant. Like this is from. Yeah. Early 2024, following the standard procedure via the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty and importantly, the actual end to end email contents were not given because Proton themselves don't even have access to those. Yeah. And for clarity, Proton has given info to the FBI before. I found a case back in 2022 where the FBI was able to get data on a US Proton mail user who was being investigated for harassment. They responded in 2021 to 6,995 legal orders and complied with about 6,000 of them. In 2021, it was about 5,000. In 2020, about 3,000. I think this generally reflects the rate at which Proton has grown rather than them becoming more likely to respond to these requests. Yeah. And by responding to the requests, that doesn't really give us a good insight into what they're actually responding with. Right. Yeah, yeah. That's the other thing. Right. Like this person's email inbox was not opened to the FBI. That is a different thing. Very important. It was the name linked to their credit card. Yeah. I think like you said, this is reportable, but it was a little oversold in the headline. I know everyone does that these days, but yeah, it's good for people to understand how Proton actually works as like a privacy email. And they are not an activist group. And that is an important distinction. Like they are a Swiss business that will follow the law. And if you understand how to use Proton as a service to maximize your privacy, then it can be a very useful service. But it will not protect you in every way if you're handing them over payment information or information tied to your name that is not encrypted, that can open the possibility of an account being identifiable. Yep. So I know a lot of people had contacted me about a ProtonMail address. Like, hopefully now you have the information that you need to decide if that is something you want to use or not. Speaking of ProtonMail. Yeah, speaking of ProtonMail, we still have a ProtonMail address. Now you Know a little bit more about how you can use it if you want to. Coolzonetipson me. If you would like to send us a pitch for you or your boss to be on behind the Bastards. If you would like us to plug your book, if you you want us to talk about your fucking timeshare, you can send all of that to coolzone mediaeheartmedia.com especially if it's the last one. I will block you. Oh no. I'm looking for a timeshare that seems like a good investment. Sick. But that is the email for non tips for things that are not related to news. Tips. You can use the Cool zone media@iheartmedia.com email address. Talking of tips, I have a tip Garrison, for marketing people. If you email anyone 10 times a day, you're going to piss them off. They're not going to want to fucking hear from you. Stop it. Some of you aren't. Well, you're not emailing them. You've got an AI doing it. It's got to be AI. Yeah, that's the. That's not a person. If it's a marketing person. There are other people who email 10 times a day. Yeah, I mean this was a marketing person who was emailing some of our work addresses. Try and get us to plug their podcasts, which aren't our podcasts, to stop it. Grow up. Have some self respect. Yeah. What's really fun is if you go on Reddit you can find a subreddit for those kind of marketers where they'll complain about journalists not responding. And it's beautiful. Yeah, you can't see because the podcast. I'm raising both my middle fingers at this time. Like I. Anyway, this has been us whining about marketing people. I hope you all have a lovely week. I will be as I hug as many of those proteinies as I can. Garrison, if you want to start really bulking up, you need at least 100 grams of protein a day and there's 10 in each. That's only 10 espresso. Protinis. Protinis. You could pour them in a camelback and go about your day. Just make sure you dip the end of the camelback in the buffalo dry rub. In the buffalo dry rub for the nozzle. Have a little shaker. Have a little. A little. We reported the news. Oh God, did we. We reported the news. Hey, we'll be back Monday with more episodes every week from now until the heat death of the universe. It could happen. Here is a production of Cool Zone. Media. For more podcasts from Cool Zone Media, Visit our website coolzonemedia.com or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can now find sources for it could happen here listed directly in Episode Descriptions. Thanks for listening. No one knows what the future holds, but you deserve a weather app that can help. Weatherbug is easy to use and provides forecasts for your every need, from storm warnings to pollen levels right at your fingertips. Get the fastest local Alerts and comprehensive 10 day forecasts wherever you are. Its hyperlocal real time customizable alerts make sure the weather never takes you by surprise so you can plan every day with confidence. Download the free weather bug app from the App Store today and start getting accurate weather forecasts 247 when your schedule sounds like this. Are you kidding me? An oil change is the last thing you have time for. So drive into Take five and let our techs change your oil. Check your tires, top off your fluids and have you back on the road pit stop fast. All while you stay in your your car. No putting your entire schedule on hold. No upsells, no problem. So you can get back to your to do list or not. Find your nearest shop@take5.com take5 the stay in your car 10 minute oil change home is your favorite place. Spring is when you let it feel a little more transportive. Discover vibrant scents inspired by place bright citrus, fresh florals, clean air, energy designed to to refresh your space without adding complexity. Just plug it in, choose your scent and let the season unfold room by room. Explore the new Spring collection now available@pura.com this is Jacob Goldstein from what's yous Problem? When you buy business software from lots of vendors, the costs add up and it gets complicated and confusing. Odoo solves this. It's a single company that sells a suite of enterprise apps that handles everything from accounting to inventory to sales. Odoo is all connected on a single platform in a simple and affordable way. You can save money without missing out on the features you need. Check out odoo@O-O-O.com that's o d o o.com this is an iHeart podcast. Guaranteed Human.