Book Riot Podcast Summary: "NIGHTBITCH is in the Wild. Is it Good?"
Episode Information
- Title: NIGHTBITCH is in the Wild. Is it Good?
- Podcast: Book Riot - The Podcast
- Hosts: Rebecca Schinsky and Vanessa Diaz
- Release Date: January 3, 2025
Introduction to "Nightbitch"
In this special holiday episode, Rebecca Schinsky and Vanessa Diaz delve into the adaptation of Rachel Yoder's 2021 novel, Nightbitch. Transitioning from its limited theatrical run, the film is now available for streaming on Hulu, prompting a rich discussion about its merits and shortcomings.
Rebecca Schinsky [00:32]:
"It's an interesting choice that they dropped this onto streaming right after Christmas, but lots of us are home. We're looking for things to stream and I have to tell you, I am so grateful that you have become my intrepid partner in probably ill advised movie adaptations."
Vanessa Diaz [00:59]:
"This was a hilarious thing to tell my parents. Hey guys, I'm going to go to my room to watch a movie for work."
Overview of the Book
Nightbitch centers on a woman, referred to only as "Mother," who transitions from her career in the art world to becoming a stay-at-home mother. Her husband, known simply as "Husband," is frequently away for work, leaving Mother isolated with her toddler, "Baby." This isolation leads Mother to experience a surreal transformation into a dog at night, symbolizing her internal struggle and primal instincts.
Rebecca Schinsky [05:34]:
"Nightbitch, as I said, is based on Rachel Yoder's 2021 novel of the same name. It is about a woman who has quit her job in the art world to be a stay at home mother to her toddler."
Adaptation into Film
The adaptation, directed by Marielle Heller and featuring performances by Amy Adams and Scoot McNary, aims to translate the book's introspective and visceral themes onto the screen. However, both hosts express reservations about how effectively the film captures the novel's essence.
Vanessa Diaz [10:36]:
"The way the dog stuff came about in the film... went from one place to the other. And, yeah, she was developing some of the symptoms."
Differences Between Book and Movie
A significant portion of the discussion revolves around the disparities between the novel and its film counterpart:
-
Portrayal of Motherhood:
- Book: Offers a sharp, satirical critique of societal expectations placed on mothers, emphasizing desperation and the loss of personal identity.
- Movie: Softens the critique, presenting a more marketable and palatable narrative that leans towards a "hetero optimist" perspective.
-
Transformation Sequence:
- Book: Details Mother's physical transformations into a dog with graphic and visceral descriptions, highlighting her internal turmoil.
- Movie: Visual representations of transformation come off as whimsical or silly, diluting the intended horror and desperation.
-
Ending:
- Book: Ends with Mother’s revolutionary performance art that serves as a rallying cry against oppressive societal norms.
- Movie: Concludes with a more subdued resolution where Mother reconciles with her husband and decides to have another child, lacking the impactful closure of the novel.
Rebecca Schinsky [26:05]:
"In the book, Mother has tapped into this primal part of herself. She needs to start creating art again... it's become this thing... Night Bitch, and everyone knows that it's this stand in for motherhood."
Vanessa Diaz [23:39]:
"I feel really bad. Do we recommend this? But I kind of don't. I really. Yeah, I just walked away."
Performances and Direction
While the hosts commend the performances, particularly Amy Adams' portrayal of Mother, they critique the direction and narrative choices that fail to fully embody the book's intense emotional landscape.
Rebecca Schinsky [28:21]:
"His performance is way better than the material she was given."
Vanessa Diaz [34:02]:
"I was starting to. Okay, this is the build-up. This is going to get really, really, really into the thick of it at the end. And I didn't feel like we got there."
Critical Reception and Conclusions
Both hosts agree that the film does not live up to the book's powerful message, feeling that it misses the opportunity to deliver a profound critique of societal pressures on motherhood. Instead, it opts for a more surface-level resolution that lacks the depth and urgency of the source material.
Rebecca Schinsky [35:46]:
"The book is like, there's a problem here... The movie fundamentally accepts the way that things are and sends her back in for more."
Vanessa Diaz [38:03]:
"It just sort of feels like we got to the, like, everything's gonna be fine. It's like, in a way that... felt very pat."
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Ultimately, Rebecca and Vanessa recommend reading the novel over watching the film adaptation. They highlight the book's incisive social commentary and emotional depth, which they feel the movie fails to capture effectively.
Rebecca Schinsky [41:36]:
"We endorse the novel, maybe not so much the film."
Vanessa Diaz [41:48]:
"Anytime."
Rebecca Schinsky [41:00]:
"The book is deeply political in that way that the personal is political. And I felt like the movie sanded off all the sharp edges or all the sharp teeth, maybe, that the book had."
Conclusion
"NIGHTBITCH is in the Wild. Is it Good?" offers a candid critique of the Nightbitch film adaptation, contrasting it with the novel's potent narrative. Rebecca Schinsky and Vanessa Diaz articulate their disappointment with how the film undermines the book's core messages, advocating for readers to engage with Rachel Yoder's original work to fully grasp its societal implications.
Notable Quotes:
-
Rebecca Schinsky [22:47]:
"She doesn't do that the way that we completely figured it out... it wasn't so much about."
-
Vanessa Diaz [34:02]:
"It's just like, for this regular domestic life and still have a little bit of both."
-
Rebecca Schinsky [35:21]:
"Emily Nussbaum writes that despite its flashes of rage, it was a hetero optimist movie in a heteropessimist age."
This comprehensive summary encapsulates the podcast's in-depth analysis of the Nightbitch adaptation, providing listeners and readers with valuable insights into the strengths and shortcomings of both the novel and its cinematic rendition.
