
Hosted by John Davidson · EN

In a recent episode of Broken Truth’s Freedom Counsel, host John Davidson interviewed Major Thomas Haviland, a data analyst and retired military officer known for his research on unusual white fibrous clots observed by embalmers and some medical professionals since 2021.Haviland has conducted multiple surveys on the topic and collaborated with scientists to investigate the composition and possible causes of these clots.Origins of the ResearchThe discussion referenced the 2022 documentary Died Suddenly, in which several embalmers reported finding unusual white, fibrous structures in the veins and arteries of deceased individuals, beginning around mid-2021. Haviland contacted the Ohio Embalmers Association shortly after viewing the film. The association’s president, Woody Wilson, confirmed observing similar clots, which led Haviland to launch formal surveys.These surveys expanded from the United States to several other countries, including Canada, the UK, Australia, and New Zealand. According to Haviland’s 2024 survey results, 83% of the 301 embalmers who responded (250 individuals) reported seeing the white fibrous clots, with an average occurrence in approximately 27% of the bodies they handled.Scientific Analysis and Proposed MechanismHaviland is working with a team that includes retired polymer chemist Greg Harrison in Australia and neuroscientist Dr. Kevin McCarron in Japan. Their analysis suggests the clots may involve an interaction between the body’s fibrinogen (a natural clotting protein), the spike protein associated with COVID-19 vaccines, and the phospholipid nanoparticles used in mRNA vaccines.Testing conducted on clot samples has included:* Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), which showed low levels of iron, potassium, and magnesium compared to typical blood clots, but elevated levels of phosphorus, sulfur, and occasionally tin.* High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), which indicated unusual ratios of fibrinogen chains (approximately 9:4:1 for beta, gamma, and alpha chains, versus the normal 1:1:1 ratio).Haviland noted that these findings differ from standard fibrin clots and drew a comparison to “white clot syndrome” observed decades ago in connection with certain heparin formulations.Reports from Living PatientsHaviland also described contact with Dr. Basharat, a cardiologist and endovascular specialist in Jacksonville, Florida. According to Haviland, Dr. Basharat reported removing similar white fibrous clots from living patients in his catheterization lab over a period of several years. Communication with the physician later ended after he cited instructions from hospital administration to cease discussion of the matter.Update from TennesseeIn June 2025, Haviland spoke at the Tennessee Funeral Directors Association annual convention at the invitation of then-president Taylor Moore. During the presentation, 18 out of 28 embalmers indicated by show of hands that they had observed the white fibrous clots in the first half of 2025. A survey conducted at the event reported the clots appearing in roughly 17% of cases, along with instances of microclotting in smaller blood vessels.Haviland suggested that such microclots could potentially contribute to symptoms such as reduced oxygen exchange and related health issues, though he emphasized this as part of ongoing discussion.Response from Health AuthoritiesHaviland stated that his outreach to the FDA and CDC over the past three years has not produced substantive responses. He also noted that many embalmers and medical professionals have been reluctant to discuss the phenomenon publicly.Additional ResourcesFor more information on Haviland’s surveys and related research, he directed viewers to the Clotastrophe Substack, managed by Laura Kasner.The full interview is available on the Broken Truth YouTube channel and Rumble. The topic remains a subject of continued investigation and debate within parts of the medical and research communities.Thanks for reading BrokenTruth.TV! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.brokentruth.tv

Dr. Simone Gold Exposes Media Smears, Coroner Bias, and a Frivolous Lawsuit That Cost AFLDS Over $250,000 — Now Fully Dismissed With PrejudiceIn a decisive ruling that mainstream media has yet to acknowledge, a Nevada district court has fully dismissed all claims against Free Speech Foundation, Inc. d/b/a America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) in a high-profile wrongful death lawsuit (case file PDF’s at bottom of the article). The case, Estate of Jeremy Parker et al. v. Medina Culver, D.O. et al., Case No. CV23-00219 (Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County, Dept. 8), alleged that AFLDS bore responsibility for Jeremy Parker’s death after he obtained a hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) prescription through a third-party telemedicine referral listed on AFLDS’s informational website.Dr. Simone Gold, physician, attorney, and founder of AFLDS, joined host John Davidson and co-host Jennifer Kennedy, Esq. of Freedom Counsel on BrokenTruth.TV to discuss the case, the evidence, institutional biases exposed during litigation, and the broader fight for medical freedom.Background: A Case Amplified by Media and PoliticsJeremy Parker, 52, died suddenly on February 3, 2022, at a friend’s home in the Reno/Sparks area. His widow, Jelena Hatfield, and other family members filed suit, claiming a single therapeutic dose of HCQ — prescribed months earlier via telehealth — caused his death. The narrative was heavily promoted by The Intercept and Time Magazine, which linked the tragedy to AFLDS and “right-wing doctors” pushing repurposed COVID treatments.Dr. Gold emphasized AFLDS’s limited role: the organization is a nonprofit focused on education, public information, essays, videos, and medical freedom advocacy. It never employed prescribing physicians, conducted telemedicine, maintained patient records, or owned telehealth platforms. It simply listed independent providers as resources for patients seeking awake doctors during a time when many physicians were restricted from early treatment options.Court Rulings: Complete Dismissal With PrejudiceOn August 29, 2025, the court held a hearing and later issued an Order Granting Defendant Free Speech Foundation, Inc. d/b/a America’s Frontline Doctors’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third-Amended Complaint With Prejudice. The court rejected claims of wrongful death, negligence, deceptive trade practices, and breach of contract against AFLDS.Key reasons included:* No underlying tort or duty owed by AFLDS, a public information nonprofit.* No viable vicarious liability (apparent authority) theory under Nevada law (NRS 41.085).* Failure to comply with medical malpractice affidavit requirements (NRS 41A.071).* Claims of negligent referral or supervision not recognized in Nevada.* Lack of consideration or mutual assent for any alleged contract.Thanks for reading BrokenTruth.TV! This post is public so feel free to share it.The dismissal with prejudice means the claims were so fundamentally deficient that no amendment could cure them — a strong judicial rejection.A later Omnibus Order (addressing remaining issues) granted summary judgment to co-defendant Dr. Medina Culver, D.O., denied AFLDS’s request for attorney’s fees, and denied plaintiffs’ challenges to costs. Despite the complete victory on the merits, AFLDS was left bearing over $250,000 in defense costs after more than two years of litigation involving multiple experts (cardiologists, pathologists, and HCQ specialists) and repeated amended complaints.The Fatal Flaws: Autopsy, Death Certificate, and BiasThe court filings and discovery highlighted glaring discrepancies:* The autopsy documented dilated cardiomyopathy — a floppy, enlarged heart with high risk of sudden death, often linked to chronic alcohol use. This critical finding was omitted from the official death certificate.* The death certificate, signed by Washoe County Medical Examiner Dr. Laura D. Knight, listed only: “Sudden Death In The Setting Of Therapeutic Use Of Hydroxychloroquine.”* Parker received 10 tablets (2,000 mg total) in August 2021; his wife maintained he took only one. Blood levels were sub-therapeutic. HCQ experts confirmed a single 200 mg dose could not cause death.* Emails between coroners revealed political skepticism toward HCQ and AFLDS, raising questions about scientific objectivity in a legal document with major financial and reputational consequences.Plaintiffs’ expert evidence was weak compared to the defense’s high-caliber specialists. The prescribing physician’s motion for summary judgment was also granted, further underscoring the lack of causation.Media Role and Ambulance-Chasing AllegationsDr. Gold criticized The Intercept and Time for sloppy reporting that ignored basic facts: the prescription header showed a separate telehealth platform (not AFLDS), the prescription predated death by months, and AFLDS had no direct involvement. No reporters contacted AFLDS for comment. Attorney Luke Busby was described as continuing the case long after evidence showed it was meritless.Why This Case MatteredThis lawsuit was part of a larger pattern: using tragedy to discredit safe, generic, decades-old medications like HCQ, intimidate early-treatment advocates, and chill free speech on medical issues. AFLDS’s survival and the with-prejudice dismissal represent a victory for truth over narrative.As Dr. Gold noted, defending the case drained significant resources from a modest nonprofit doing vital work — including amicus briefs supporting medical freedom cases at the U.S. Supreme Court on Emergency Use Authorization issues.Listen to the full interview on BrokenTruth.TV for Dr. Gold’s detailed, unfiltered account, sworn testimony highlights, coroner emails, and discussion of ongoing medical freedom battles (including the upcoming GoldCare.com town hall on Hantavirus with Dr. Robert Malone).Court documents, including the dismissal order, Omnibus Order, and death certificate, are available below. Medical freedom depends on sunlight — this case shows what happens when politics overrides pathology and journalism skips due diligence. AFLDS continues the fight at AFLDS.org.Thanks for reading BrokenTruth.TV! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.brokentruth.tv

Good news! After two years of shocking behavior by the state of Florida, South Santa Rosa News reports that Kenlee Zuraff has been relocated back to her hometown, where her mother Joy lives. We teased this update on April 23rd during a visit to the latest court hearing in Milton, Florida, but now that it’s public knowledge, we are able to report it. The Kenlee case received national attention when 3 now-removed DCF workers were caught on camera smirking and grinning during the abduction of Kenlee from her mother Joy under armed police oversight. Joy had concerns with a black-box warning drug that doctors wanted her daughter to take, resulting in the taking of the child before many of us got involved and raised attention to the family’s plight. The situation had become so twisted that, as of February, the state was attempting to terminate Joy’s parental rights and put Kenlee up for adoption. OANN allowed me to share Joy and Kenlee’s story in February. The case highlighted other significant cases with Florida’s DCF. We recently interviewed Tasha Patterson in her fight against medical kidnapping by the state after a hospital failed to diagnose a child with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome which caused bone fractures.This case led to “Patterson’s Law”, allowing families to obtain additional medical review before DCF forcibly removes children from their parents. The bill is currently waiting on Governor Ron Desantis’s signature. Human Rights attorney Leigh Dundas also brought to light another case involving child abuse in Florida. We recently proposed Kenlee’s Law, encouraging reform in Florida’s DCF and a way to protect families from government overreach. Notably, the law would require recordings for all DCF interactions, transparency about state medical abductions, and remove qualified immunity for judges and government workers who commit fraud upon the court.We have been told the issues with Florida DCF have caused concern in the DeSantis administration and how it could affect his 2028 presidential aspirations. While Kenlee has not been returned to her family, we applaud the state for making progress towards reunification. Sign the petition to support Kenlee’s law today.Thanks for reading BrokenTruth.TV! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.brokentruth.tv

In a powerful and emotional episode of Broken Truth with host John Davidson and Freedom Council, South Florida Nurse Practitioner Tasha Patterson and her attorney Valentina Villalobos shared the devastating story of how their family was torn apart by a flawed child abuse diagnosis. The twins were removed by the Department of Children and Families (DCF) in September 2022 after multiple fractures were discovered. Despite overwhelming medical evidence pointing to an underlying genetic and metabolic bone condition — not parental abuse — Tasha and her husband Michael’s parental rights were terminated in 2023. As of the interview, adoption of the twins was scheduled for the end of that week.This case is far more than one family’s tragedy. It directly inspired Patterson’s Law, a groundbreaking piece of Florida legislation designed to prevent similar injustices by guaranteeing families facing DCF allegations the right to a second medical opinion.The Medical Beginnings: A High-Risk Pregnancy and Fragile InfantsTasha’s twins were born prematurely at 34 weeks and 6 days via C-section. The pregnancy was complicated by preeclampsia, oligohydramnios (low amniotic fluid), breech presentation, and premature rupture of membranes. One twin spent 24 hours in the NICU; the other required two weeks due to breathing issues. After discharge, the infants were home for only six to seven weeks but showed persistent fussiness. Multiple doctor visits and ER trips attributed the symptoms to colic or reflux, with treatments like Pepcid and rice cereal in formula offering little relief.During a late-night ER visit for the second twin, pressure marks from a Velcro swaddle prompted a full child abuse workup. Skeletal surveys revealed numerous fractures in both twins — ribs, metaphyseal injuries, and more. DCF immediately removed the children, law enforcement launched a criminal investigation, and Tasha was arrested in the street after being followed from her home. A relative gained temporary custody, but the family faced strictly supervised visitation.Crucially, new fractures continued to appear even after removal — including while the twins were in the relative’s care under constant supervision and during a subsequent hospital stay. One relative described holding an infant who pushed against his chest, resulting in an audible “pop,” visible deformity, and a confirmed new fracture on X-ray. The baby did not cry, a key indicator of underlying bone fragility.A Chorus of Expert Testimony: Metabolic Bone Disease and Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos SyndromeTasha, a trained Nurse Practitioner, had suspected her own connective tissue issues prior to the births and was already pursuing genetic evaluation. Post-removal, the family assembled an extraordinary team of specialists whose findings were unanimous and compelling:Dr. Marvin E. Miller, M.D., a leading expert in infant bone fragility, identified a perfect storm of risk factors for Metabolic Bone Disease (MBD): twin pregnancy (increased calcium demand), prematurity, maternal magnesium sulfate (used for preterm labor, which weakens fetal bones), antacids like Tums/Pepcid/Nexium (interfere with mineral absorption), oligohydramnios, and short umbilical cords limiting fetal movement and bone loading. He emphasized that fragility fractures in weakened bones occur with normal handling, lack associated bruising or severe internal thoracic injuries (unlike abusive fractures), and are transient, peaking in early infancy.Dr. Anthony Perszyk, M.D., a Florida geneticist often consulted by child protection teams, clinically diagnosed Tasha with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (h-EDS) based on her Beighton score of 9/9, POTS, TMJ dysfunction, soft tissue injuries, GI issues, and pregnancy complications. He confirmed the twins also have the condition. Their abnormal bone matrix (due to defective collagen) predisposes to fractures during birth, NICU care, and routine infant handling. Perszyk noted genetic testing for h-EDS is frequently negative but does not negate the strong clinical diagnosis.Dr. Michael Holick evaluated Tasha and raised clear concerns for h-EDS.Dr. David Ayoub, collaborating with Dr. Miller on radiology, documented classic signs of healing rickets and MBD: craniotabes (soft skull spots), rachitic rosary (cupped ribs), subperiosteal new bone formation, ulnar cupping, and more. An early radiologist had noted decreased bone mineralization, only to issue a suspicious addendum reversing that finding.Dr. Eli H. Newberger, M.D., founder of the Child Protection Team at Boston Children’s Hospital with six decades of experience diagnosing over 3,000 abuse cases, provided a detailed expert opinion supporting a medical etiology.Dr. Gerard Pals, Ph.D., an international authority on Osteogenesis Imperfecta and rare bone diseases, reviewed imaging and determined that alleged “skull fractures” were actually congenital accessory sutures and ossification defects — common in bone fragility disorders but frequently misread by radiologists as trauma. Many rib fractures dated to the perinatal or NICU period.The twins’ own treating geneticist later provided additional reports reinforcing a genetic/connective tissue disorder.Legal Battles, Systemic Barriers, and Denied JusticeDespite this mountain of evidence, the dependency court limited testimony in the reopened termination trial to only two experts. The judge credited the state’s witness over the family’s specialists. Appeals, including to the Florida Supreme Court via habeas corpus, were denied — often within days and without full hearings. New evidence (injury dating, genetic findings, former CPT doctor urging reconsideration) was rejected as “reinterpretation” rather than “new.”Valentina Villalobos highlighted procedural issues: parents advised to plead the Fifth in civil dependency cases (due to parallel criminal charges that never went to full trial), allowing judges to draw negative inferences; alleged conflicts with the presiding judge’s donations to involved hospitals (Joe DiMaggio); and broad immunities protecting Child Protection Teams and hospitals from accountability.Tasha never received a full opportunity to testify. The emotional toll is profound: “This is harder than jail… These are my kids.” The twins, now receiving proper treatment for their condition, still cry for “Mommy Tasha” at the end of visits.Patterson’s Law: Turning Personal Tragedy into Systemic ReformTasha’s case became the namesake and driving force behind Patterson’s Law, a critical reform addressing one of the most glaring failures in Florida’s child welfare system — the lack of access to independent medical expertise in abuse allegations.The legislation ensures that parents facing DCF-related allegations involving medical child abuse or unexplained injuries have the statutory right to obtain a second medical opinion from a qualified specialist. It passed both the Florida Senate and House with strong bipartisan support and was awaiting the governor’s signature at the time of the interview (effective date July 1 following passage).Patterson’s Law represents a vital safeguard. As John Davidson and the family noted, it acknowledges that rushed diagnoses — especially in complex premature infant or genetic cases — can destroy families without due process. It counters financial incentives in the system (federal Title IV-E funding tied to removals) and the tendency of some Child Protection Teams to “dig in” due to immunity protections.Tasha and her advocates hope the law will not only help future families but exert moral and practical pressure on the judiciary and DCF to revisit cases like hers where truth and new evidence have been sidelined in favor of finality.A Pattern of Overreach?The interview touched on systemic issues: families losing children after seeking medical care for legitimate conditions, ignored exculpatory evidence, and the human cost when “finality supersedes the truth.” Tasha’s stepson (then 8) testified to a loving home with no violence — testimony disregarded. The relative who observed fractures under supervision also provided powerful testimony.Freedom Council and similar organizations emphasize that while intervention is sometimes necessary, cases involving no prior history, no criminal record, and strong medical defenses deserve rigorous scrutiny — including second opinions now enabled by Patterson’s Law.Current Status and How to HelpWith appeals exhausted and adoption imminent, the family faces limited legal avenues but continues advocating. The twins remain with a relative and are receiving appropriate genetic care, yet the separation persists despite supervised visitation and clear medical exoneration.Watch the full interview on BrokenTruth.TV to hear Tasha, Valentina, and John Davidson in their own words.Support the Patterson family and their legal efforts at: youarethepower.net/pattersonJoin or support Freedom Council at freedomcouncil.org — attorneys helping attorneys fight these critical battles.Tasha Patterson’s story is a testament to a mother’s love, medical truth prevailing against institutional resistance, and the power of persistence. Patterson’s Law stands as a beacon of reform born from profound loss. May it prevent other families from enduring the same nightmare — and may justice ultimately prevail for Tasha, Michael, and their twins....

In a candid Freedom Counsel interview on BrokenTruth.TV, host John Davidson sits down with Florida OB-GYN Dr. Kimberly Biss to discuss her frontline observations in obstetrics and gynecology, her concerns over post-COVID trends in pregnancy outcomes, and her ongoing efforts to pursue independent research despite significant hurdles. Dr. Biss, a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist practicing in St. Petersburg, Florida, with over 30 years of experience and former leadership roles including Chief of Staff at Bayfront Health, has become a prominent voice highlighting potential shifts in miscarriage rates, menstrual irregularities, and fertility issues following widespread COVID-19 vaccination campaigns. Her clinical data from her practice has drawn national attention, including testimony before Congress, as she reports observing notable increases in adverse outcomes that she believes warrant deeper, unbiased investigation. The conversation turns to the challenges of advancing such inquiries. Toward the end of the interview, Dr. Biss addresses the difficulty of securing funding and implementation for studies that question prevailing narratives:“So I’m in a research group. You know, it’s a 501c3 and we have two projects, pilot projects that we’re trying to get funding for. It’s just impossible because it’s going to go against the narrative of safe and effective.”This frustration echoes broader concerns in the medical community about institutional resistance to research that might challenge established public health positions, particularly around pregnancy and vaccination. Dr. Biss emphasizes that the barriers are not technical—”I don’t think so. It’s just getting it funded and then utilized”—but rather systemic and ideological. Her work aligns with a growing push for greater transparency and patient-centered data in women’s reproductive health. As a Senior Fellow with the Independent Medical Alliance and recently appointed to the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Dr. Biss brings extensive clinical experience to national discussions on vaccine policy. Freedom Counsel ContextFreedom Counsel, in partnership with BrokenTruth.TV, focuses on defending medical freedom, parental rights, and informed consent. This interview exemplifies their mission: amplifying voices of practicing physicians who prioritize patient safety and evidence over consensus. Dr. Biss’s insights come from hands-on care involving thousands of pregnancies, providing a grounded perspective amid polarized debates. Looking AheadAs Dr. Biss and her research collaborators seek support for their pilot projects, the interview serves as a call to action for donors, policymakers, and fellow clinicians committed to rigorous science without predetermined outcomes. John Davidson closes warmly: “Well, Dr. Kim Biss, thank you so much. It’s been a pleasure making friends with you, and I can’t wait to hang out with you again.” To which Dr. Biss replies, “Yeah, it’s been awesome.”Watch the full Freedom Counsel interview on BrokenTruth.TV for deeper insights into Dr. Biss’s data on miscarriages, infertility trends, hormonal disruptions, and her vision for better protecting women’s health in an era of rapid medical innovation. This discussion underscores the need for open scientific dialogue—especially on topics as vital as pregnancy and early life. Freedom Counsel and BrokenTruth.TV remain dedicated to hosting these critical conversations.Thanks for reading BrokenTruth.TV! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.brokentruth.tv

By Staff Writer Who Still Trusts NBCIn what can only be described as a reckless threat to public health, former CNN journalist John Davidson sat down with notorious anti-vaccine activist and part-time horse doctor Dr. Mary Bowden on the latest episode of Broken Truth.What was supposed to be a serious interview quickly turned into an embarrassing display of Bowden dodging basic facts, refusing to apologize for her crimes against consensus, and somehow still sounding reasonable. Sources close to reality are concerned.From the moment Davidson opened with the hard-hitting discussion about whether she starts every patient visit with a rectal exam, it was clear this would be no ordinary podcast. Bowden, clearly rattled, tried to clarify that she is in fact an otolaryngologist — a claim this program has not independently verified.“If the vaccines were dangerous, CNN would have told us”Davidson repeatedly pressed the Houston ear doctor on why she won’t just trust the real experts: Dr. Bill Gates, Dr. Peter Hotez, and Dr. (Esq.) Dorit Reiss. Bowden’s refusal to accept Bill Gates’ medical degree was particularly alarming.At one point, the host heroically offered her oats. She asked for beef jerky. Typical.Bowden also continued her bizarre conspiracy theory that a $26,000 judgment against her by the $13 billion “nonprofit” Houston Methodist Hospital somehow doesn’t count as losing. She further claimed — without evidence — that her medical license was never actually revoked. This reporter remains skeptical.“Next question.”When asked to define what a vaccine is, Davidson wisely pivoted. When confronted with the ironclad retracted LancetSurgisphere study that proved hydroxychloroquine was killing MAGA patients, Bowden muttered something about Harvard doctors getting in trouble. Classic deflection.The low point came when Davidson courageously raised the OnlyFans pharmacist who bravely sounded the alarm early in the pandemic. Instead of taking career advice like a professional, Bowden declined. Some people just can’t be helped.Final Verdict from People Who MatterDr. Bowden ended the interview by encouraging viewers to buy her book — which, according to our fact-checkers, does not come with crayons (yet). Davidson closed by congratulating her on her grift and reminding everyone he is definitely not thirst trap Mikki Willis.Click here to know which book not to buy on amazon using this Amazon Associates link.This program is deeply concerned that impressionable viewers might walk away thinking early treatment, informed consent, and mocking corporate media are acceptable. We urge you to watch the full episode immediately so you can help us ratio it in the comments.BrokenTruth.TV: Still platforming dangerous questions in 2026. Think of the children.Thanks for reading BrokenTruth.TV! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.brokentruth.tv

Dallas, Texas – April 2026At the IMA’s 2026 conference, focused on emerging trends in medicine, host John Davidson sat down with pathologist and Independent Medical Alliance Head of Medical and Scientific Affairs, Dr. Ryan Cole. The wide-ranging conversation touched on Dr. Cole’s ongoing fight for medical free speech, his deep dive into photobiomodulation (red light therapy), the hidden impacts of “junk light” and agricultural chemicals, and a return to nature’s basics for true wellness.Dr. Cole, a board-certified pathologist with clinical experience in emergency rooms, urgent care, and family medicine, has long advocated for early treatment protocols and patient-centered care. He briefly served with America’s Frontline Doctors and faced intense scrutiny from the Washington Medical Commission for his public statements and prescribing practices during the COVID era. That disciplinary process, which restricted aspects of his license, now appears to be winding down. Dr. Cole expressed hope that a recent 8-1 U.S. Supreme Court ruling on free speech in medicine and therapy has prompted Washington regulators to reconsider their position. “The First Amendment matters. The Constitution matters,” he said, adding that he remains ready to fight to the end if needed.Today, Dr. Cole leads policy and educational efforts for the IMA, including state and federal legislative work, visits to HHS, conferences, and webinars. He also balances life as an organic farmer in Idaho—raising vegetables, livestock, and tending 200 fruit trees—while keeping up with his six daughters. His mission is simple yet profound: help people reclaim health through straightforward, nature-aligned practices.A Personal Introduction to Red Light TherapyThe discussion turned quickly to photobiomodulation, the topic of Dr. Cole’s conference presentation. His interest began with a personal injury three years ago: tearing his bicep tendon while throwing a bale of hay on his farm. His physical therapist predicted months of twice-weekly sessions. Skeptical but open, Dr. Cole encountered a red light device at a dinner in Toronto. After just 20 minutes, his pain dropped from 7/10 to 2/10, and his range of motion improved noticeably.Doubting the placebo effect at first, the scientist in him dug deeper. He discovered the extensive photobiomodulation literature—roughly 10,000 published papers today, compiled in databases like that of Finnish researcher Vladimir Heiskanen. Mentors in the field include Harvard’s Michael Hamblin (now emeritus) and others exploring light’s effects on cellular repair.“If light can heal a tendon, what else can it do?” Dr. Cole asked. The answer, he found, goes far beyond injury recovery. Modern society suffers from “junk light”—the blue-heavy spectrum of LEDs that replaced incandescent bulbs around 2020. Streetlights and household fixtures shifted to energy-efficient LEDs, but at what cost?In nature, blue light never appears without balancing red and near-infrared wavelengths from sunlight. Incandescent bulbs once provided a fuller spectrum. LEDs and modern lighting disrupt circadian rhythms, sleep, mood, vision, endocrine function, and even raise cancer risks—particularly among night-shift workers. “We think we’re saving the planet with a light bulb,” Dr. Cole noted. “Only 6% of household energy goes to lighting. The rest powers compressors, air conditioners, and refrigerators. We’re starving our signaling pathways, messing with blood sugar and mood—all in the name of reductionism.”He pointed to history: Danish physician Niels Ryberg Finsen won the 1903 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for using red light (via carbon arc lamps) to treat smallpox scarring and skin tuberculosis (lupus vulgaris). Medicine once embraced light therapy, then largely forgot it—perhaps because such modalities can’t easily be patented or monetized.Dr. Cole emphasized the bigger picture: returning to natural light cycles. “Get up, meet the sunshine, set your body clock. Get real-world experience instead of living in a box with fake light all day.”Glyphosate, the Microbiome, and “Death by Government”The conversation shifted from light to what we put in our bodies. Dr. Cole runs a regenerative organic farm and has researched glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup and other herbicides. He noted that Monsanto patented glyphosate as a broad-spectrum antimicrobial in the early 2000s and again in 2010—before Bayer’s acquisition. It doesn’t just kill weeds; it disrupts soil bacteria, beneficial fungi, parasites, and the human gut microbiome.“It also binds essential minerals needed for amino acids and proteins,” he explained. The result? Everyday meals deliver an unintended dose of antibiotic without consent, harming the microbiome that supports immunity, digestion, and overall health. “We wonder why everybody’s sick,” Dr. Cole said. “We’re poisoning our food, our light, our water (with fluoride), our air, and our medicines—then acting surprised at rising chronic illness, metabolic disorders, autoimmune conditions, and even gender confusion linked to endocrine disruptors like atrazine.”He highlighted elevated Parkinson’s rates among farmers and golfers (heavy spray areas) and criticized efforts to grant agricultural chemical companies legal immunity similar to that for vaccines. On his own farm, weeds and pests exist, but nature finds balance. “Mother Nature is no fool. She knows what we need. We keep trying reductionist fixes and thinking we can do it better.”The discussion led to medicine at a crossroads: increasingly “Orwellian” systems on one side versus open-minded groups like the IMA exploring overlooked therapies—including red light, DMSO, and chlorine dioxide—alongside fundamentals like real food and natural rhythms.As a pathologist, Dr. Cole sees himself as “the observer at the scene of the crash,” reporting cellular-level damage (cancers, infections) while drawing on his clinical background to view the whole patient. “I understand the mechanisms, but I put that back into the picture of thinking like a clinician.”Looking AheadDr. Cole continues teaching, researching, and advocating through the IMA. He urged listeners to prioritize basics: sunlight, regenerative food, and awareness of environmental toxins.To follow Dr. Ryan Cole’s work, connect with him on X at @DoctorCole (full: Dr. Cole spelled out) or on Substack at ryancolemd.substack.com.The full interview is available on the Broken Truth podcast. As Dr. Cole and the IMA demonstrate, true progress in medicine may lie not in ever-more-complex interventions, but in remembering what nature has provided all along—and defending the freedom to discuss it openly. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.brokentruth.tv

In a must-listen Freedom Council interview on BrokenTruth.TV, Children’s Health Defense General Counsel Kim Mack Rosenberg joins host John Davidson to break down the high-stakes legal fights reshaping America’s childhood immunization policies.The conversation centers on two major cases making national headlines. One features Children’s Health Defense and affected families suing the American Academy of Pediatrics under RICO statutes, alleging coordinated efforts that prioritize profits over children’s health. The second involves the AAP and allied groups challenging HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and recent ACIP reforms in federal court in Washington, D.C. CHD sought to intervene to ensure the real-world impacts on injured children and grieving families were heard.Judge Brian Murphy’s recent preliminary injunction in Massachusetts has drawn intense scrutiny. It paused key changes to the ACIP process and vaccine recommendations, prompting appeals now heading to the First Circuit. Rosenberg details the credentials of the new ACIP members—including toxicologists, biostatisticians, and experts challenging the status quo—and contrasts them with past committees plagued by pharmaceutical conflicts of interest. She highlights how previous panels often approved additions to the schedule with minimal safety data on the cumulative effects.The discussion dives deep into the broader crisis: America’s children face record chronic illness rates despite the highest healthcare spending. Rosenberg addresses the “customers for life” model she sees in pharmaceutical influence, the erosion of informed consent, and why families who lost children to alleged vaccine injuries deserve their day in court. She also touches on parallel free speech battles, including Supreme Court cases involving doctors’ rights to discuss treatment options.Key moments include:* Why one federal judge’s ruling has effectively halted major federal health policy shifts.* The human cost behind the headlines—stories of families facing sudden infant deaths and ongoing investigations after following the schedule.* The shocking financial incentives revealed in physician declarations opposing schedule changes.* Optimism for appeals and the long-term fight to restore evidence-based, transparent decision-making at ACIP.Rosenberg emphasizes that these cases go far beyond procedure: they concern whether science, safety testing of the full schedule, and parental rights will finally take precedence over entrenched interests.Tune in to the full podcast episode on BrokenTruth.TV for the unfiltered conversation. As battles over vaccines, medical freedom, and government oversight intensify, this interview provides essential context on what’s at stake for American families.Thanks for reading BrokenTruth.TV! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.brokentruth.tv

In my award-winning documentary Epidemic of Fraud (2025 refresh), the evidence is unmistakable: FDA’s Janet Woodcock and BARDA’s Rick Bright worked together in March 2020 to sabotage early access to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). They deliberately restricted the drug’s Emergency Use Authorization to hospitalized patients only — guaranteeing it would not be used early, when it could have saved lives.Here is the exact segment from the film that lays it out (full transcript featured below):Rep. Buddy Carter: “So was it because the president was encouraged by the use of this drug that you became discouraged by?”Rick Bright: “Nothing to do with politics, sir.”…Narrator: “The idea to deny early treatment came from the FDA.”…“Rick Bright’s complaint continues: Implementing the EUA was a compromised position to rein in HHS leadership’s initial campaign to make the drug available to the public outside of a hospital setting…”That phone call between Woodcock and Bright on March 24, 2020, is the smoking gun. Bright’s own sworn whistleblower complaint and congressional testimony confirm Woodcock pushed the restrictive EUA to block outpatient use. The film also notes Woodcock’s deep ties to the opioid crisis (she oversaw approvals of OxyContin and fentanyl) and her editorial role at the New England Journal of Medicine when it published the fraudulent Surgisphere study that torpedoed HCQ.To let the full internal record speak — or to give Woodcock and Bright the chance to provide “context” — I filed a simple FOIA on November 2, 2023 (Control # 2023-9711):All communications between Janet Woodcock (Janet.Woodcock@fda.hhs.gov) and Rick Bright at BARDA.The FDA immediately acknowledged it as a “complex track” request. On the recorded call with FOIA Branch Chief Guruprasad Udapi, he told me straight: there were 1,100 requests ahead in the queue and I should expect “at least 24 months” before processing. No expedited treatment, even with public interest and congressional documents already public. We agreed to keep the request alive.Full Phone Call Transcript with Guruprasad Udapi (November 2023) — Featured Here for the Record[Full verbatim transcript embedded — the same call where Udapi confirms the 24-month minimum and states “all requests are treated the same.” Udapi also acknowledges that I wished to keep this request active.]28 Months Later: Zero Progress, Zero Response, Still Listed in FDA’s Own LogsIt’s now March 31, 2026 — 28 months past filing. The FDA’s own February 2026 FOIA Received Log and FY 2024 log both still list #2023-9711 with no closure date, no partial release, and no indication of any processing whatsoever. It is exactly where Udapi said it would be: buried in the date-ordered queue.On February 12, 2026, I emailed Udapi directly (CC’d to Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.):Mr. Udapi,What is the status of this request for communications between Janet Woodcock and Rick Bright?We are now well over the two years you estimated it would take to obtain these records.Thank you for your timely assistance in this matter.John DavidsonNo reply. Not a single word.There is nowhere on any FDA portal showing movement on this request. The agency has simply gone radio silent.What Are They Hiding?Epidemic of Fraud already proved the collaboration existed through Bright’s whistleblower complaint, congressional records, and Woodcock’s own refusal to comment on biological-weapon defense uses of HCQ. The FOIA was filed to give the public the complete email chain — or to let Woodcock and Bright explain themselves.Instead, the FDA has chosen 28 months of deliberate delay and non-response. Even with Secretary Kennedy now leading HHS and demanding transparency, the career bureaucrats at CDER’s FOIA office continue the cover-up.This is not backlog. This is protection of the officials who shaped the “hospital-only” policy that contributed to unnecessary deaths while 52 other countries used HCQ successfully.Watch the full segment from Epidemic of Fraud above — then ask yourself: If the FDA has nothing to hide, why has my FOIA been ignored for 28 months and still sits unprocessed in their own logs?Woodcock is no longer with the FDA. She anounced her retirement 8 days after I told her my film was coming out. Rick Bright works at The Rockefeller Foundation as the Senior Vice President of Pandemic Prevention and Response. A role that is ironic since, according to Bright’s unsworn testimony to the House Committee he had never heard of hydroxychloroquine prior to 2020. Remember, HCQ was based on the first chemical compound ever used to treat an infectious disease. Hm.The movie is available now on BrokenTruth.TV and EpidemicofFraud.com. The American people paid for these emails. We have waited long enough.John DavidsonMarch 31, 2026Transparency is not optional when the stakes were human lives. Demand the release of FOIA #2023-9711.Watch the full film “Epidemic of Fraud” below. Thanks for reading BrokenTruth.TV! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.brokentruth.tv

In an exclusive interview on Broken Truth, hosts John Davidson and Warner Mendenhall sat down with Katie Pasitney of Universal Ostrich Farms in Edgewood, British Columbia. What began as a story of a family farm battling avian influenza has become one of the most shocking examples of government overreach in Canadian agricultural history — a 314-day standoff that ended in a literal firing squad.Pasitney recounted how the nightmare started in December 2024. A handful of ostriches fell ill after contact with migratory birds. Two deceased birds tested positive for H5N1 via PCR by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). The agency — Canada’s equivalent of the USDA or FDA — ordered the immediate destruction of the entire flock under its rigid “stamping-out” policy. The birds? They were not poultry. They were ratites — a distinct family including ostriches, emus, and rheas — and the vast majority had already recovered. Many had natural antibodies from prior exposure dating back to 2020, creating what Pasitney called a “living laboratory” of herd immunity.The family fought for 314 days, begging for live testing, offering expert witnesses, and pleading with the CFIA, courts, and even international voices like RFK Jr. and Dr. Mehmet Oz. They presented evidence that the flock posed zero risk: flightless birds, geographically isolated 135 km from any major city, on a farm dedicated to antibody research rather than meat or eggs. The CFIA refused. No onsite testing of survivors was allowed — their own policy threatened farmers with up to $200,000 fines per animal or six months in jail for attempting to test or treat. The agency even struck the family’s expert reports from judicial review.Then came November 6–7, 2025. After the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear the final appeal, CFIA agents, backed by RCMP, turned the farm into a kill zone. Pasitney described it as “the most brutal possible way” — a theatrical display of force with unmarked marksmen, hay-bale kill pens, and high-capacity rounds that aerosolized blood and tissue across the property. Officially, 314 ostriches were culled. The family insists the body count in the field didn’t add up. They suspect many hens — the source of their prized antibody science — were quietly removed in the dead of night (2:30–4:30 a.m. operations behind the pens) for study. Left behind: blood-soaked straw bales, shell casings, unspent rounds, and discarded syringes. The family is now testing the syringe contents, believing the birds were being experimented on before execution.Key Updates from the InterviewThe fight didn’t end with the gunfire. Pasitney revealed major post-cull developments:* Tribunal Victories and Fines: The family faced two $10,000 fines. They lost the first for allegedly failing to report the initial illness (despite phone logs showing they contacted vets immediately). But they won the second on a critical technicality: the CFIA improperly served quarantine documents by email instead of hand-delivering them with a proper risk assessment. The tribunal judge rejected the agency’s excuses — weather, protesters, lack of RCMP — noting they somehow mobilized hundreds of officers for the cull. Pasitney pointed out the absurdity: from February 26 to September 22, 2025, during the supposed “most virulent threat,” CFIA never conducted a single onsite visit after dropping off the improperly served papers in a plastic baggie.* Posthumous Testing Bombshell: A longtime farm supporter secretly tested a bird after the cull. Result? Negative for active avian influenza — exactly as the family had claimed all along.* Successful Treatment the CFIA Ignored: While barred from treating their own animals, the family used hypochlorous acid (HOCl) in the water at a 5% solution. Symptoms vanished across the flock. No more deaths. The CFIA showed zero interest in this low-cost, effective mitigation — even as it could have protected supply chains and trading partners.* Evidence of Pre-Planned Cull: Shockingly, the local landfill was contacted in November 2024 — before any birds showed symptoms in December — about accepting ostrich carcasses. The CFIA had already lined up disposal before the outbreak was even confirmed.* Science Theft Allegations: During one visit, CFIA agents asked where the family stored “COVID-19 antibodies.” In March 2025, the agency quietly granted funds to a Quebec lab to develop antibody diagnostic test kits — the exact innovation Universal Ostrich had offered using their recovered flock’s bloodwork. Pasitney believes their science made them a target: competition for Big Pharma and government-controlled solutions.* Ongoing Legal Battle: Attorney Shane Dukas of Vernon, BC, is handling the case, with the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) taking the constitutional portion. A compensation request has been pending for 2–3 months. The family is challenging search warrants, their own arrests (for feeding their animals after being “baited” to the back of the farm), Charter rights violations, and even the wrong address listed on every quarantine document — potentially rendering the entire quarantine illegal. They also discovered their bloodwork shows H5N1 antibodies, yet they remain healthy — further proof the virus is not the apocalyptic threat portrayed.Pasitney named the birds that were family: Peter (her mother’s protector), Q-tip (the tall, fuzzy-headed giant), Big Bear (always pacing for attention), Regretta (the bruising pecker), Annabelle, Colin (half-blind but full of life), and dozens more that trusted humans until the end. “They destroyed my mom’s identity,” she said. These were 20- to 35-year-old breeder stock, not six-month meat birds.The interview painted a broader picture: misclassification of ratites as poultry, a “one-size-fits-all” policy that ignores science, and what Pasitney and the hosts described as part of a larger agenda — food control, genetic biodiversity loss, and the push toward lab-grown meat under the 2030 framework. “He who controls the food controls the people,” they noted. The cull wasn’t just about birds; it was about crushing independent farmers and independent science.Public support was overwhelming and creative: a rental company demanded its vehicles back (loaded with kill materials), local businesses refused bobcats and tarps, and independent journalist Drea Humphrey of Rebel News provided boots-on-the-ground coverage that mainstream Canadian media (government-funded) largely ignored or spun.Pasitney remains resolute: “We’re not giving up. The blood that was spilled will have justice.” The family is pursuing every legal avenue, calling for whistleblowers, and urging Canadians to wake up to emergency powers, unelected agency overreach, and the erosion of food security.Watch the full interview on BrokenTruth.TV. This isn’t just one farm’s tragedy — it’s a warning. When government can execute healthy animals on suspicion alone, destroy livelihoods, and ignore science, no farmer — or citizen — is safe. Follow the ongoing legal battle and support the fight for accountability at Universal Ostrich Farms. The world was watching in November. The real question is: will it act now?Thanks for reading BrokenTruth.TV! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.brokentruth.tv