Loading summary
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
Longtime listeners of Chasing Life probably know that Halloween is kind of my favorite holiday. If you visit my house, you'll see that I go all out with the decorations. I'll spend hours working on this. And there's also something about the dopamine rush that comes with watching a horror movie or a perfectly timed jump scare in a haunted house. I love it. There's also the sugar rush that comes from eating your favorite Halloween candy. I know, I know. But I gotta tell you, Halloween candy has become somewhat of a hot topic of debate here at cnn. We take the issue very seriously. I'm Wolf Blitzer in the Situation Room.
Laura Schmidt
With my very favorite Halloween candy, the.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
Crispy, sweet and always delicious Kit Kat bar. How's this for breaking news?
Laura Schmidt
Kit Kat.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
Hey, Sanjay, it's David Ryan from the One Thing podcast. I've got an entire bag of three musketeers here. My absolute favorite. These are going right in the freezer, which is where all your candy should be. Are people not freezing their candy? Freeze your candy, people.
Laura Schmidt
I will die on this island alone if I must. If we're going full Halloween, you have to go candy corn friends. You know, Sanjay, there are so many different amazing options here in the candy aisle. And really, you can't go wrong. I mean, everywhere you look, there's like new candies. But at the end of the day, the one thing that everyone loves that you cannot go wrong with is the Hershey miniatures. I'm sorry, Mr. Goodbar. Crackle regular with almonds. This is the best.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
Those last two voices were, of course, my friends Kate Baldwin and Jake Tapper. For the record. Hi, I'm with Kate. My favorite candy is the candy corn, despite what my senior producer, Amanda Seeley has to say about this. Now, as you hear this, you may be surprised to learn that I indulge in a little candy on Halloween, given all that we've talked about with regard to sugar and its impact on the body. Most of us know that excess added sugar is not good for us, period. It's been linked to type 2 diabetes, obesity, a lot of different health conditions that maybe you don't even think of. There were recent studies linking it to anxiety and depression and faster aging. And at the same time that we know all this, we also know that Americans are somewhat sugar obsessed. We eat or drink an average of 15 to 19 teaspoons of sugar every day. Just to give you some context, that's about five to eight fun sized candy bars. So the average American needs to cut back on their sugar probably by at least Half, if not more. But how do we do that without taking the sweetness out of life? Especially when it seems like sugar has snuck its way into so many different foods you might not even expect. There is sugar in pasta sauce, there is sugar in breakfast meats. It is everywhere. It's not just the holidays like Halloween.
Laura Schmidt
If you're one of the unfortunate people that really struggles with craving and compulsion around sugar, you're stuck in a food environment that is constantly feeding you cues. You know, eat sugar. Eat sugar.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
Laura Schmidt is a sociologist and a professor of health policy in the School of Medicine at the University of California at San Francisco. She is a leading expert in the field of sugar studies. And what she's going to teach us today is that the truth about how much sugar we should eat and when we should eat it is far more complicated than you might think the headline is. It's bittersweet. She also says that for some of us, the spookiest part of sugar may be in how we think about it.
Laura Schmidt
If you're already struggling with craving and addiction, turning it into a big boogeyman probably isn't the greatest idea.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
On today's podcast, Laura Schmidt, who will weigh in on everything from artificial sweeteners to why some say sugar can be just as addictive as cocaine. I'm Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN's chief medical correspondent, and this is Chasing Life. Let me start off by asking a little different question. Do you think that we have been overly villainizing sugar?
Laura Schmidt
Yes and no. I think that there's a problem in the way that we talk about food and nutrition, which is that we focus on single ingredients or single nutrients. Some people say saturated fat is great and I can eat all the meat I want, but no carbs. You know, there are a lot of different nutrient focused strategies. And the problem with that is that from a health standpoint, that's not what matters. What matters is the whole diet. What matters is having all of the macronutrients in a relatively good balance. So that's the part that is. It's problematic to only focus on sugar and certainly to villainize it. On the other hand, Americans are consuming about 19 teaspoons of sugar a day. That is way, way over the limit. Men should be consuming maybe nine teaspoons a day, women six. So we're way over the limit on sugar in America. It's in everything. It's in 72% of the foods in your grocery store. And we really need to be thinking about ways to dial that particular ingredient down.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
It seems like an impossible task. To really know how much you're consuming. Because again, reading some your work, it's everywhere. I mean, you know, you think of things that are sweet having sugar in it, but it's pasta sauce, it's breads, it's all these other things. Why is sugar and pasta sauce, what is it the role that it's playing in something that is not sweet.
Laura Schmidt
The food companies have three ingredients that they can use to make food more palatable, and some people say hyper palatable, so extremely attractive to consumers. And that's sugar, fat and salt. And pretty much they vary the combination of sugar, fat and salt in most of our ultra processed foods. And often they're put in there because the industrial food production process kind of makes stuff taste bad. Like one reporter from the New York Times once went into a Dorito factory and got a Dorito chip that didn't have all the coating on it. It was just the good old Dorito chip unvarnished, and it tasted like cardboard. And so the companies have to put sugar, fat and salt and chemical additives in the food in order to make it taste okay. And so that's why we find sugar in everything. We also find salt and various fats in everything.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
Right.
Laura Schmidt
There's a lot of really important and interesting science going on in the field right now around how does the human body sort of respond our reward system to these combinations of ingredients and what, what really triggers the desire to eat more? We are biologically rigged to like sugar, and we all know it. We experience it every day. The sensation of sweetness on our tongue is the reward center in your brain kicks off immediately when it gets that sensation of sweetness. And this makes a ton of sense from an evolutionary standpoint because of course, our ancestors were hunters and gatherers, and it would be make a ton of sense to be biologically rigged to go for that. That sweetness, the glucose is what fuels our bodies. The problem is we're not doing, we're not hunters and gatherers anymore. We're people living in a food environment that bombards us with sugar and ingredients that are desir and that we're rigged.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
To want and that makes it challenging. So going back to the nine teaspoons versus six teaspoons for women, how can you possibly know, given how ubiquitous sugar is in our diet? It sounds like a little bit of a fool's errand to say, hey, look, I listen to what Dr. Schmidt says on the podcast and I'm now going to eat just six or nine teaspoons of sugar a day. You couldn't Possibly know.
Laura Schmidt
No, you need a chemistry degree to read the back of the ingredients package, the ingredients label. You know, there are 69 names for sugar and counting more, we haven't really found them all yet. But the, you know, there's a saving grace here and that is that the number one source of added sugar in our diets is sugar sweetened beverages. It is a huge percentage. It's the main thing way that we consume added sugars. And so that's why a lot of my work in this space just focuses on that. Because there's nothing redeeming in a soda or a sports drink or an energy drink from a health standpoint, right? I mean there may be lots redeeming from a pleasure standpoint. And if you've got a budget of six or nine teaspoons a day of sugar, then you can have one can of soda, right? That's about right. And then you've, you know, used up your budget for the day.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
But, but no pasta sauce, no cereal.
Laura Schmidt
No past, no bread.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
Right, no bread.
Laura Schmidt
It's hard. But you know, the thing about soda is that for one thing, so if we can just help people to lower or quit their consumption of that one product, that will make a big dent in their health. And that's what we do at UCSF. We have a big NIH funded trial and what we've done is we've taken 16 hospital campuses in Sutter health and we've randomized them and we've said, okay, a few of them, we're going to take the soda out of the workplace. People can bring it in, fine. But for the people who consume a lot and want to quit, we're going to not sell it right in there in front of them. And then in addition, we're going to give people who drink a lot of soda and want to quit. We're going to give them a little brief intervention based on like what doctors do for alcohol. In five minutes they assess, do you have a problem? And if you do, here's what you can do about it and some motivational counseling to help them quit. And we have found that this intervention actually lowers waist circumference. People lose waist circumference, which is a really important marker for metabolic health. The employees when we piloted this intervention at ucsf, they lost a half an inch in their waist in 10 months. And this was simple, very 15 minutes on a Zoom with a counselor and we take it out of your workplace. And this is what I view as the low hanging fruit. Simple, accessible interventions targeting people who really do drink too much, you know they want to quit. And just providing them a little support, counseling, and making it not so tempting to have it all over your work environment.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
I love that. One thing that I've that's been a common theme that's come up in many of the interviews I've done, is a reminder of just how biodynamic the body is. It can get bad quickly, but it can also get good quickly. People can improve quickly. I think that should be inspiring.
Laura Schmidt
And when you talk about biodynamics, my colleague at UCSF who's a pediatric endocrinologist, Rob Lustig, did a trial and he took kids off of sugar for two weeks, and their fatty liver problems improved. And you're looking at incredibly impactful interventions just by taking one thing out of the diet.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
What's your stance on using artificial sweeteners?
Laura Schmidt
I follow the World Health Organization's recent guidelines around this, and who at this point is recommending people without diabetes stay away from it. The problem with the chemical additives in our food supply, which are now a topic of major concern in the field, is that in America, we don't follow the precautionary principle, which would say, before we put this chemical in cereal that a child eats every morning, we should be thinking about whether it's safe. Instead, we flip it around and we say, put it in the cereal and wait to see if it's safe. And that's the problem when it comes to artificial sweeteners. There's science on both sides. There are some very influential papers and published in major journals like Nature that show very negative effects on the microbiome, the gut microbiome. And there are studies that show that consumption of these products actually increases your weight, can produce obesity. And there's a lot of debate about what's going on there, is that reverse causation or not. But I think if there are multiple studies suggesting that something's potentially harmful, we ought to be thinking twice about it Now. That said, in our work with, say, folks who drink too much soda and want to quit, what we find is that artificial sweeteners provide this sort of gateway. And I come from an addiction research background, and I know that there are a lot of habitual behaviors that happen around addiction, and that if you're able to provide functional equivalents and substitutes, at least temporarily, while people are adjusting to not having the substance, it helps a lot. And so for people who really have a bad soda habit, artificial sweeteners may be putting a little soda in, mixing it with soda water and then gradually titrating yourself off is one way that you can kind of use artificial sweeteners in a limited way to help yourself completely get off the sugar.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
Do you, do you drink coffee?
Laura Schmidt
Yes.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
Do you sweeten it?
Laura Schmidt
No.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
So you just have black or maybe whiskey?
Laura Schmidt
I've been ever, ever since, you know, I started, I was working on alcohol for about 20 years, and then I shifted over to working on sugar because it felt to me like we have all these great public health strategies to deal with alcohol and we have none to deal with sugar, and we're feeding it to children particularly. I was compelled when I learned that actually the fastest growing cause of liver transplant in America is not alcohol cirrhosis. It's non alcoholic cirrhosis due in part to excess sugar consumption. That got my attention. That's an interesting thing. And it turns out that our bodies, you know, when particular kind of sugar fructose hits our liver, our liver often transforms it into fat. And that fat stays in the liver. And so we've got about 40% of the US population of adults with fatty liver disease. It was the fatty liver stuff that made me take a double take. And that's when I started 15 years ago, having 60 spoons of sugar in a day or less, like the American Heart association recommends. And I'm fine, I'm fine. And I don't count it, I don't count it. I'm not crazy about it, and I certainly wasn't with my children. One of the really cool things that kind of got me hooked on alcohol research when I was younger was this study. They were looking at the different cultural traditions and how people teach children about alcohol. And they could show in these epidemiological studies that Jewish families raised children that actually were less likely to develop drinking problems. And part of that is because there's a cultural tradition of when you have a kid around and everyone's toasting and drinking, you let them have a little sip. You teach the child that this is a special occasion thing. And when we're all celebrating Hanukkah or we're all celebrating somebody's birthday, yeah, people take a little sip. But then most of the time we don't drink it. We don't drink it every day. And that actually insulates children when they grow up from alcoholism. And so when, when you have sugar in your house, you shouldn't tell your children, don't eat it, or, ooh, that's bad. Or Halloween. No, no, you must, you must never enjoy Halloween and go trick or treating and binge on sugar, you say, yeah, it's tasty, isn't it? And it's great. And that's why we have it on special occasions. We have a lot of moralism in America around, you know, what we eat and what we drink. And so taking some of that energy out of how we raise our children around healthy diet. I think there's wisdom in that. And teaching children that dessert for breakfast is not what we do here. We don't just pour out a huge cereal bowl of, you know, Twix or sugar snaps. We make a beautiful birthday cake and we celebrate with that.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
I think that's really lovely. And I think you're right. I mean, I have three teenage girls as well. What we did, I think you'll appreciate, is we had the switch witch would show up the morning after Halloween and the switch witch would switch out all the candy for something else, a little toy or something like that. And that's how we got the candy out of the house, because we knew if we kept it in the house, it was probably going to, over time, get eaten.
Laura Schmidt
Yeah.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
We're gonna take a quick break here, but when we come back, Professor Schmidt weighs in on the debate around whether sugar is actually addictive or not. Plus, we got some real tips on how to curb a sweet tooth. We'll be right back. You mentioned Robert Lustig earlier, your colleague. I did a piece for 60 Minutes with him several years ago. All around sugar. The Toxic Truth, it was called. One of the things that he sort of gravitated around, I remember during our discussion was the addictiveness of sugar. And I think people have even said that sugar can be as addictive a substance as cocaine, for example. And again, you're a very practical person. I can tell in the time that we're talking, and I want to not be hyperbolic, but what about the addictive qualities of sugar? Is it that addictive?
Laura Schmidt
Well, I come out of an addiction background And I actually, 20 years ago, I even published a paper on sugar and said, you know, we don't have the evidence that it's addictive just because rats prefer it to cocaine, water. In an animal experiment, or you can.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
That was the experiment that everyone sort of cited was that these rats were in a cage and they had. They had water, cocaine, sugar, and there was sugar that they kept tapping the. The button for. Tapping the lever for.
Laura Schmidt
Yeah. As the studies have stacked up, I've come around to thinking it probably is that it's that addictive that it is addictive. And I'm one of the big skeptics. And so the way psychiatrists think about addiction, you know, it's physical things like withdrawal, intolerance, and then it's psychological things like loss of control and use despite harm. And at this point, we've got evidence on all of these diagnostic criteria for sugary foods, and in particular, the foods that people with binge eating disorder binge on, which tend to be a combination of carbohydrates and fats in high quantities. The tricky thing about addiction is that a lot of it depends on the way the drug is consumed and the footprint of the drug in our reward system and in our bodies. So, you know, people up in the Andes mountains have been chewing coca leaves forever. And it's like having a cup of coffee, but you take coca leaves and you refine the cocaine out of them and you inhale it, you smoke it, which is a very fast route of administration, right? It goes straight into your. In your bloodstream and you get a massive high out of that. And it's highly addictive. And so if you really step back and you look at addiction from that frame of reference, you have addictive substances like crack and you have nicotine, right? Nicotine produces a very mild high even when smoked, right? So they're all different, and they all have different pathways. And I think that the science on addiction and sugar is kind of coming out to suggest that, no, it's not like a chemical addiction like nicotine, where it directly acts on the brain, it has an indirect route to act on the brain. And so I think a lot of it comes down to the route of administration. Also, the dose makes the poison. And so the more you consume, the more likely it is to be addictive. There's just been a lot of evidence building in this area, and I've come around. I was a real skeptic, but I've come around to agreeing that it probably.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
Is, given that and given how palatable sugar is and how we evolved as human beings. And now your belief, along with other scientists, that it is addictive, it sounds like a tough train to stop. Can we train our brains for moderation? I know you have, you said you eat a very healthy diet, but I'm just talking in general. How challenging is it to train our bodies and brains to moderately consume sugar?
Laura Schmidt
Also, I'm economically stable. I have the time and the money to get myself over to the produce stand or the farmer's market in order to buy myself a healthy diet and work around what's in the grocery store. And most people in America don't have that privilege. I think that if the norms could shift a little bit on this, on this topic, and they are to some extent that it becomes less normalized to be eating massive quantities of sugar, that would help people a lot. Because as long as something is sort of everybody's doing it, it's normalized and it's everywhere. If you're one of the unfortunate people that really struggles with craving and compulsion around sugar, you're stuck in a food environment that is constantly triggering, it's constantly feeding you cues. Eat sugar. Eat sugar. My colleague Alyssa Epel, who's a psychologist, has done some research on people with obesity and she's found that about half of people with obesity experience compulsion and craving for food and the other half don't. And I think that's a really, really interesting finding because that means that if we're trying to help people with weight control and therefore cardiometabolic disease prevention, we need to be thinking about the half of people that actually have a psychological issue and need help with that. They need counseling, they need mindful eating interventions, they need strategies, they need help. Not just with us banging on them, don't eat sugar, or, you know, shaming people. They actually need a counseling intervention. But we need to be thinking in a much more sophisticated way. In fact, I think we need to stop debating whether it's a sugar's addictive or not and actually just focus on the fact that people tell us they crave it, people tell us they can't stop eating it, people tell us they binge on it, and let's get them some help. That's something that is amenable to change in the way that anything that causes craving is. There are strategies, there are tools, and I want to mention pharmacological interventions because it's very interesting to me that coming from an alcohol background, there's a drug called naltrexone, and we give that to people who suffer from alcoholism and drug abuse and it helps them. And it was a real big push in the addiction field to give drugs to people who have addiction. And I always felt like that is just a crime that's withholding an effective intervention. Now it turns out that naltrexone also works for people with food craving, food addiction, and of course GLP1 agonist medications work for both alcoholism and food craving, like Ozempic and. Like Ozempic and so forth. I'm not advertising. I'm very, very concerned about the long term health risks. We are very unknown. But I do think it's interesting and important to point out that those drugs work on both problems. They work for people with food cravings, and they also work for people with alcoholism.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
What did you think of when Michael Bloomberg was mayor of New York, he had this proposal. Essentially, movie theaters and places like that could not sell sugar sweetened drinks larger than 8 ounces. And just adding that intervention or that obstacle actually slowed down how much people were actually consuming.
Laura Schmidt
It works. And it was originally tried with alcohol in Europe. And it does work. Anything you can do to put friction between yourself and that addictive substance is good, right? And this is why the mindful eating interventions really help people, because it's about just putting some time in between the craving to drink and then drinking the soda. Just doing that helps people, or teaching them a technique called surfing the urge. You're feeling that 3:00, gotta have that soda, want to go to the vending machine and you just stop. You put in your earphones and you listen to three minutes of a guided meditation where you just watch what it's like to really crave something and allow it to be there. And that helps. So any friction you can put between the consumer and the product helps. But then you have to think about, well, what are the negative side effects of doing anything in public health? With the Big Gulp policy, consumers hated it. And people don't really want somebody banging on them and telling them what to do. For one thing, not everybody who has diabetes or whatever it is has a compulsion to drink soda or eat sugar. Not everybody, maybe half of people with obesity do. Right? So we have to find the people who need that targeted intervention to address the underlying issues that they've got. And for everybody else, we ought to be thinking about engineering our food system to make it easier to eat healthy things.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
So look, professor, with all, you know, the Halloween's coming up. How do you approach sweets? How do you approach sweets without the guilt?
Laura Schmidt
Without the guilt, Without. I love to cook. And if I have six teaspoons of sugar a day, I can have a big old piece of chocolate cake and I can make it. I know how much sugar's in it because I put it in there. And I have a big old thing of white sugar in my cupboard. And let's have a nice piece of chocolate cake and enjoy it and savor it, and let's let the kids have fun. But the Great Pumpkin can come too, and that's fun, too. There are ways to enjoy this thing and savor it and get up the next morning and not feel bad about yourself, right?
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
Hey, look, I like that, especially coming from you, the sugar expert. So I appreciate that. Happy Halloween and thank you for this. What a pleasure.
Laura Schmidt
Thank you, Sanjay.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta
Before we go, we're ending today's episode as we always do with paging Dr. Gupta and another question from the listener mailbag. This one is about zero calorie sweeteners. Alex from Chicago asks, is it true that people who use these types of sweeteners instead of sugar tend to gain more weight? And if it is true, then why? All right, this is really fascinating and a bit counterintuitive. First of all, here's some interesting data. There was this 2023 study from the University of Minnesota which followed more than 3,000 men and women over 20 years. And they found that the long term use of things like saccharin, aspartame, diet drinks were associated with increased levels of fat, specifically visceral fat, that fat that's inside your abdomen. Now, again, I know this is going to seem counterintuitive, but think of it like sugar substitutes can play tricks on the brain. Meaning even though you just ate something sweet, the sugar substitutes, you haven't gotten the calories associated with that. So as a result, you may start to forage for those calories, your body really craving the energy. It's why some people may drink diet sodas throughout the day, but then go scavenging for ice cream late at night. Because these sugar substitutes are often low to zero calories, our bodies simply aren't satisfied in the same way that calorie dense sugar can satisfy. And all of that, sadly, can lead to overeating and gaining weight. So many Doctors agree with Dr. Schmidt on this that unless you are diabetic when it comes to artificial sweeteners, it might be best to just opt for the real thing. But again, of course, in moderation. Hope that answers your question, Alex. And that's it for today's show. Tune in next week for a conversation about the art of compromise. Thanks for listening. Chasing Life is a production of CNN Audio. Our podcast is produced by Aaron Mathewson, Jennifer Lai, Grace Walker and Jesse Remedios. Andrea Cain is our medical writer. Our senior producer is Dan Bloom. Amanda Seeley is our showrunner. Dan Dazzula is our technical director. And the executive producer of CNN Audio is Steve Lichti with support from Jamis Andrest, John Dionora, Hailey Thomas, Alex Maniseri, Robert Mathers, Lainey Steinhardt, Nicole Pesaru and Lisa Namorow. Special thanks to Ben Tinker and Nadia Kanang of CNN Health and Katie Hinman hey prime members, Are you tired of ads interfering with your favorite podcasts? Good news. With Amazon Music, you have access to the largest catalog of ad free top podcasts included with your prime membership. To start listening, download the Amazon Music app for free or go to Amazon.com ADFreePodcasts that's Amazon.com ADFreeP Podcasts to catch up on the latest episodes without the ads.
Chasing Life: The Bittersweet Truth About Sugar
Host: Dr. Sanjay Gupta | Guest: Dr. Laura Schmidt, Sociologist and Professor of Health Policy at UCSF | Release Date: October 25, 2024
In the Halloween-themed episode of CNN’s Chasing Life, Dr. Sanjay Gupta delves into the pervasive role of sugar in our lives. Using the backdrop of Halloween's sugar-laden festivities, Gupta explores the complex relationship between sugar consumption and health, featuring expert insights from Dr. Laura Schmidt, a leading sociologist in sugar studies. The episode navigates through the psychological, physiological, and societal dimensions of sugar, offering listeners a comprehensive understanding of its impact and strategies to manage its consumption.
Gupta's Personal Anecdote: Dr. Gupta opens the discussion by sharing his love for Halloween, emphasizing the dual rush of dopamine from decorations and horror movies and the "sugar rush" from candy consumption (00:00). This personal touch sets the stage for addressing the broader debate on sugar's role in our diets.
Laura Schmidt on Sugar's Prevalence: Schmidt highlights the staggering average American sugar intake—15 to 19 teaspoons daily, equating to about five to eight fun-sized candy bars (02:00). She underscores that sugar infiltrates a vast array of foods beyond the obvious sweets, including pasta sauces and breakfast meats, making reduction challenging.
Linking Sugar to Health Conditions: Gupta outlines the well-established connections between excessive sugar intake and various health issues such as type 2 diabetes, obesity, anxiety, depression, and accelerated aging (03:00). He emphasizes the hidden presence of sugar in unexpected foods, complicating efforts to limit intake.
Schmidt's Insights on Sugar's Impact: Schmidt discusses how sugar consumption affects metabolic health, citing studies that associate high sugar intake with increased waist circumference—a key marker for metabolic syndrome (10:00). She shares findings from UCSF’s NIH-funded trial, demonstrating that removing soda from workplace environments led to measurable health improvements in participants.
Food Industry Tactics: Schmidt explains that food companies often use sugar, fat, and salt to enhance palatability, compensating for the blandness of ultra-processed foods (06:00). This combination makes processed foods highly attractive and difficult to resist, reinforcing sugar consumption patterns.
Evolutionary Perspective on Sugar Cravings: From an evolutionary standpoint, humans are biologically wired to crave sweetness as a source of energy, a trait inherited from our hunter-gatherer ancestors (07:00). However, in the modern context of constant sugar availability, these innate cravings contribute to overconsumption and related health issues.
Debate on Sugar Addiction: A significant portion of the episode addresses whether sugar is addictive. Schmidt, initially skeptical, acknowledges mounting evidence suggesting that sugar can exhibit addictive properties, meeting several diagnostic criteria for addiction (19:15). She references animal studies where rats prefer sugar over cocaine, though she notes differences in addiction pathways compared to substances like nicotine or crack cocaine.
Psychological and Physical Dependencies: Schmidt elaborates on how excessive sugar consumption can lead to both psychological cravings and physical dependencies, drawing parallels with traditional addiction models (20:00). She argues for recognizing sugar addiction as a legitimate concern requiring targeted interventions.
Targeting Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Schmidt identifies diet sodas as the primary source of added sugars in the American diet (09:00). She advocates for removing these beverages from easily accessible environments, such as workplaces, combined with brief motivational counseling to support individuals in reducing their intake.
Behavioral Interventions: Practical strategies include creating friction between the desire to consume sugar and actual consumption. Techniques like mindful eating, "surfing the urge," and implementing policies that limit access to sugary products (e.g., Bloomberg’s limit on large sugary drinks in New York movie theaters) are discussed as effective measures (26:00).
Pharmacological Aids: Schmidt touches on the potential of medications like naltrexone and GLP-1 agonists (e.g., Ozempic) to assist those struggling with food cravings and addictions, drawing parallels to treatments used in alcohol and drug abuse (25:00). She emphasizes the need for medical oversight due to unknown long-term health risks.
Raising Children with Balanced Views: Drawing from her background in studying cultural influences on substance use, Schmidt advocates for teaching children moderation rather than imposing strict bans on sugary foods (17:00). She highlights practices from certain Jewish families where children are allowed controlled exposure to alcohol, drawing an analogy to handling sugar consumption without fostering guilt or addiction.
Family Practices for Managing Sugar: Dr. Gupta shares his family's approach to managing sugar intake during Halloween, such as replacing candy with small toys to reduce temptation (18:00). Schmidt echoes the importance of creating balanced and enjoyable experiences around treats, allowing for occasional indulgence without fostering addictive behaviors.
Potential Risks of Artificial Sweeteners: Responding to listener questions, Gupta addresses concerns about zero-calorie sweeteners. Schmidt aligns with the World Health Organization’s recommendations for non-diabetics to avoid artificial sweeteners, citing studies linking them to negative effects on the microbiome and potential weight gain (28:00).
Mechanisms Behind Weight Gain: Schmidt explains that artificial sweeteners may trick the brain into craving calories, leading to overeating and weight gain despite the absence of calories in sweetened beverages (28:00). This phenomenon challenges the assumption that substituting sugar with artificial alternatives is an effective weight management strategy.
Enjoying Sweets Without Guilt: In closing, Schmidt advocates for a balanced approach to sugar consumption. She emphasizes the importance of mindful indulgence, allowing oneself to savor treats without guilt while maintaining overall dietary limits (28:00). This perspective encourages a sustainable and healthy relationship with sugar, especially during festivities like Halloween.
Dr. Gupta’s Final Thoughts: Dr. Gupta reinforces the episode’s message by appreciating Schmidt’s practical advice and wishing listeners a happy, balanced Halloween. He summarizes the need for both individual and systemic changes to address sugar consumption effectively (28:55).
Dr. Sanjay Gupta (00:00): "There's also the sugar rush that comes from eating your favorite Halloween candy."
Laura Schmidt (03:55): "The truth about how much sugar we should eat and when we should eat it is far more complicated than you might think. It's bittersweet."
Dr. Laura Schmidt (05:49): "Americans are consuming about 19 teaspoons of sugar a day. That is way, way over the limit."
Laura Schmidt (19:33): "As the studies have stacked up, I've come around to thinking it probably is that it's addictive that it is addictive."
Laura Schmidt (22:33): "If you're one of the unfortunate people that really struggles with craving and compulsion around sugar, you're stuck in a food environment that is constantly triggering, it's constantly feeding you cues. Eat sugar. Eat sugar."
Dr. Laura Schmidt (28:09): "There are ways to enjoy this thing and savor it and get up the next morning and not feel bad about yourself, right?"
This episode of Chasing Life offers a nuanced exploration of sugar's role in modern diets, balancing personal anecdotes with expert analysis. By addressing the multifaceted nature of sugar consumption—from its addictive potential to societal influences and practical reduction strategies—the discussion equips listeners with both understanding and actionable steps to navigate their sugar intake thoughtfully. As Halloween serves as a fitting metaphor, the episode underscores the importance of moderation and mindful enjoyment in fostering long-term health and happiness.
Transcript Timestamp Reference:
Chasing Life aims to empower listeners with knowledge and practical advice, demystifying the complexities of sugar to help individuals make informed decisions about their health and well-being.