Summary of "Christiane Amanpour Presents: The Ex Files" – Episode: Q&A: What's the One Question You'd Ask Trump?

Release Date: July 23, 2025
Hosts: Christiane Amanpour and Jamie Rubin

In this insightful bonus episode of "Christiane Amanpour Presents: The Ex Files," hosts Christiane Amanpour and Jamie Rubin engage in a comprehensive Q&A session, addressing listener-submitted questions that delve into pressing global and political issues. The dynamic duo leverages their extensive experience in international affairs to provide nuanced perspectives on topics ranging from American politics to Middle Eastern geopolitics.

1. American Voters' Preference for Trump Over Kamala Harris

Question from Shay on Instagram: "In your opinion, why did American voters choose Trump for a second time instead of Kamala?"

Jamie Rubin’s Analysis [01:00]: Jamie Rubin opens the discussion by acknowledging the complexity of American voter behavior. He outlines the metaphor of a political pendulum swinging between left and right ideologies:

• Pendulum Theory: According to Rubin, American politics often oscillate, with 45% of voters leaning one way and another 45% the opposite, leaving a pivotal 10% in the center determining election outcomes.
• Context of the Last Election: After eight years under Obama, Rubin suggests voters perceived a swing too far left, focusing on issues like LGBT rights, "wokeness," and identity politics, prompting a counter-swing towards Trump.
• Trump's Appeal: Rubin attributes Trump's re-election to his unconventional communication style—speaking naturally without scripted talking points—which resonated with a significant voter base despite controversial policies.
• Economic Factors: The economic challenges faced during the Biden administration, coupled with public expectations that Trump could rectify these issues, played a crucial role.
• Consequences and Future Outlook: Rubin expresses hope that Trump's current policies on immigration and tax cuts for the wealthy will face backlash, potentially swinging the pendulum back towards Democratic control in upcoming elections.

Notable Quote:

"The pendulum swung too far towards immigration and tax cuts for the rich. I hope and expect the pendulum to swing back, at least in the upcoming midterm elections." — Jamie Rubin [01:55]

Christiane Amanpour’s Contribution [03:40]: Christiane expands on Rubin's points by emphasizing Trump's use of identity politics and fear as potent campaign tools:

• Identity Politics: Amanpour highlights how Trump’s messaging appeals to a segment of white America, tapping into nationalistic sentiments despite the nation's foundational identity as an immigration powerhouse.
• Fear as a Campaign Tool: Drawing parallels with Brexit, she notes how fear and the demonization of "the other" contribute significantly to electoral victories.

Notable Quote:

"Fear and demonization of the other... also plays into those kinds of election victories." — Christiane Amanpour [04:15]

2. Crafting the One Essential Question for Donald Trump

Question from Monique on Instagram: "If you could interview Donald Trump, what is the one question you'd want to ask him?"

Christiane Amanpour’s Perspective [06:00]: Christiane expresses the challenges inherent in formulating a single, impactful question for Trump:

• Interview Difficulties: Amanpour points out the futility in attempting to probe Trump’s policies without comprehensive preparation and understanding.
• Context-Specific Approach: She advocates for tailoring questions based on the prevailing political climate and pressing issues of the day, rather than seeking a broad, overarching inquiry.
• Past Experiences: Amanpour mentions her limited opportunities to interview sitting presidents, underscoring the complexity of engaging Trump in meaningful discourse.

Jamie Rubin’s Proposition [07:34]: Jamie Rubin suggests focusing on Trump’s influence in the Middle East, particularly regarding Israeli politics:

• Bibi Netanyahu & Abraham Accords: Rubin proposes asking Trump about leveraging his relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to foster meaningful diplomatic solutions in Gaza and expand the Abraham Accords to include Saudi Arabia.
• Strategic Pressures: He emphasizes the potential impact of U.S. presidential pressure on Israeli policies, aiming for a sustainable ceasefire and the establishment of a Palestinian state.

Notable Quote:

"What would be the downside for you to really hold Netanyahu's feet to the fire enforcing a solution in Gaza that would achieve your goal... of getting another country added to the Abraham Accord?" — Jamie Rubin [08:45]

3. The Arab World's Role in Resolving the Gaza Conflict

Question from Jennifer via Email: "Why does the Arab world in the Middle East seemingly do nothing to help resolve the Gaza conflict? How would you recommend they play a more constructive role on this issue?"

Jamie Rubin’s Insights [09:04]: Jamie Rubin highlights the potential for the Arab nations to take a proactive stance in Gaza:

• Arab-Led Forces: He proposes that Arab countries collaborate to establish a dedicated force in Gaza, supported by CENTCOM and the U.S. military, replacing Israeli forces to both safeguard security and facilitate reconstruction.
• Historical Efforts: Rubin references past initiatives involving the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Egypt, noting that a viable plan was nearly in place, with Secretary Blinken stating, "We are 85% of the way there."

Christiane Amanpour’s Counterpoints [10:23]: Christiane challenges Rubin’s optimism by distinguishing between normalization and genuine peace accords:

• Abraham Accords Critique: Amanpour argues that while the Abraham Accords normalized relations, they did not address fundamental peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
• Ceasefire vs. Peace Deal: She emphasizes that a ceasefire is merely a temporary halt to conflict, not a resolution. True peace requires comprehensive negotiations addressing all underlying issues.

Notable Quote:

"The Abraham Accords... they're normalization accords. They're good. You want normalization, but they're not peace accords." — Christiane Amanpour [10:56]

4. Regional Interests in Iran and the Prospect of Regime Change

Question from Loner via Email: "We all talk about the US, Europe, and Israel in relation to Iran, but what about the countries located in and around Iran? What interest do they have in a regime change in Iran? What does Turkey want? Think Oman, Turkmenistan, Armenia, Pakistan, Syria, and other players. Will any of them take any actions and if so, what could that be?"

Christiane Amanpour’s Analysis [16:35]: Christiane delves into the intricate dynamics of Middle Eastern politics concerning Iran:

• Overemphasis on Iran: She critiques the international community's fixation on Iran, suggesting it diverts attention from resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict—a core issue threatening regional stability.
• Human Rights Focus: Amanpour laments the neglect of human rights in policy discussions, advocating for a shift towards addressing the Iranian populace's rights rather than solely focusing on geopolitical threats.
• Regional Stability: She underscores the general desire among Middle Eastern nations for stability, opposing regime changes that could lead to failed states.

Jamie Rubin’s Perspective [17:51]: Jamie Rubin offers a more critical view of Iran's influence:

• Pernicious Influence: He characterizes Iran as a destabilizing force over the past two decades, citing its support for Assad in Syria and militant groups like Hezbollah and Hamas.
• Potential for Change: Rubin holds out hope that internal recognition within Iran of the detrimental effects of its foreign policies might lead to a focus on domestic issues, thereby reducing regional interference.

Notable Quotes:

"The unresolved issue between Israel and the Palestinians is the existential threat to Israel." — Christiane Amanpour [18:10]

"For the last 25 years, Iran has been a pernicious player... Now it's come home to Iran, come home to the people of Iran, the policies that they have conducted." — Jamie Rubin [18:12]

Discussion Highlights:

• Regional Players’ Interests: Both hosts agree that neighboring countries like Oman, Turkey, and Pakistan seek stability and are wary of Iran's disruptive influence.
• Shift from Global to Regional Focus: There is consensus that comprehensive regional solutions, particularly addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, are essential for long-term peace.

Conclusion

In this episode, Christiane Amanpour and Jamie Rubin navigate complex geopolitical landscapes with clarity and depth. They dissect voter behavior in the United States, scrutinize the role of Arab nations in Middle Eastern conflicts, and evaluate the multifaceted interests surrounding Iran's regional influence. Their discourse underscores the interconnectedness of global politics and the imperative for nuanced, informed approaches to fostering peace and stability.

Final Thoughts: Christiane Amanpour emphasizes the necessity of ignoring simplistic narratives and instead advocating for human rights and comprehensive peace agreements. Jamie Rubin complements this by highlighting actionable avenues for diplomatic engagement and strategic policy shifts.

Notable Closing Quote:

"You can never ignore [the Palestinian issue] and you can certainly not continue to ignore it. It's the basis, you know, no justice, no peace in the world." — Christiane Amanpour [13:36]

Note: Advertisements and non-content sections were omitted as per the episode guidelines.