The Dreyfus Affair: The Spy Scandal that Shook France

Summary

Dan Snow's History Hit: The Dreyfus Affair - A Comprehensive Summary

Episode Title: The Dreyfus Affair: The Spy Scandal that Shook France
Release Date: April 27, 2025
Host: Dan Snow
Guest: Professor Ruth Harris, University of Oxford

---

Introduction to the Dreyfus Affair

In the episode titled "The Dreyfus Affair: The Spy Scandal that Shook France," host Dan Snow delves into one of the most tumultuous and defining moments in late 19th-century European history. The Dreyfus Affair, a complex saga of espionage, antisemitism, and political intrigue, serves as a lens through which profound societal and constitutional questions are examined.

Unfolding of the Affair

Dan Snow begins by describing the initial incident that triggered the crisis: a flimsy, almost transparent list of military intelligence documents, known as the "Bordereau," was intercepted. Despite the flimsy nature of the evidence, the French counterintelligence swiftly pointed fingers at Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish artillery officer from a wealthy Alsatian family.

Notable Quote:

“It was signed simply with the letter D. French counterintelligence searched for this spy. They searched for D.”
— Dan Snow [01:43]

Alfred Dreyfus: The Accused

Alfred Dreyfus, characterized by Ruth Harris as a reserved and intelligent man, found himself at the center of a national scandal. Despite the lackluster evidence against him, Dreyfus was court-martialed, degraded publicly, and exiled to Devil's Island in South America, where his health deteriorated severely.

Notable Quote:

“He was put on trial. He was exiled to a tiny island off the coast of South America where he had an almost complete breakdown of his mental health and almost lost his life.”
— Dan Snow [08:36]

Antisemitism and Political Climate

The affair was deeply intertwined with the prevalent antisemitism in France. Ruth Harris explains how antisemitic sentiments were exacerbated by economic scandals like the Panama Canal scam, which fueled conspiracy theories targeting Jews and republicans alike.

Notable Quote:

“Antisemitism becomes a very important ingredient here, and with it, an obsession with conspiracy.”
— Ruth Harris [14:31]

Role of Intellectuals and Public Opinion

Emile Zola, a prominent novelist, played a pivotal role in transforming the affair into a public debate. His open letter "J'Accuse…!" galvanized public opinion and exposed the military's cover-up, highlighting the role of intellectuals in advocating for justice.

Notable Quote:

“Zola writes an open letter in a newspaper... and it's after that that the affair blows and it becomes a public affair.”
— Ruth Harris [20:15]

Trials, Retrials, and Miscarriages of Justice

Despite mounting evidence against Esterhazy, the actual spy, the military continued to focus on Dreyfus. After enduring horrific conditions on Devil's Island, Dreyfus was brought back for a retrial in 1899, where despite his deteriorated state and overwhelming evidence of his innocence, he was again convicted.

Notable Quote:

“It's an extraordinary story. They go from wrongly convicting to actively trying to cover up and create a case against Dreyfus.”
— Ruth Harris [24:56]

Legacy and Constitutional Implications

The Dreyfus Affair had lasting implications for the French state, leading to significant constitutional changes such as the separation of church and state in 1905. It also left deep scars in the political psyche of France, influencing future movements and conflicts, including the rise of Zionism and the dynamics of the Popular Front.

Notable Quote:

“It sets up the dynamic for the separation of church and state in 1905.”
— Ruth Harris [35:42]

Impact on Zionism and Modern Implications

The episode concludes by exploring how the Dreyfus Affair influenced Jewish thought, particularly Zionism. Theodore Herzl, observing the rampant antisemitism, concluded that Jews could not assimilate in Europe and advocated for the establishment of a Jewish state as a solution to enduring persecution.

Notable Quote:

“He argues for the establishment of a state of Israel... it's one of the earliest Dreyfusards, a man named Bernard Lazare, who comes out of the affair, also on the left, thinking that the only solution for Europe's antisemitism is a Jewish state.”
— Ruth Harris [38:29]

Conclusion

Professor Ruth Harris provides a nuanced analysis of the Dreyfus Affair, emphasizing its role as more than just a scandal but as a mirror reflecting the intense societal divisions and the fragility of justice. The episode underscores how the affair encapsulated the broader struggles within French society and its enduring legacy in shaping modern political and social landscapes.

Notable Quote:

“What I find most disturbing about the affair is that it's sordid... it's very disturbing to see how deeply entrenched these biases were.”
— Ruth Harris [33:11]

---

This episode of Dan Snow's History Hit offers a comprehensive exploration of the Dreyfus Affair, seamlessly weaving historical facts with insightful analysis. It highlights the complexities of justice, the pernicious effects of prejudice, and the enduring impact of political and social movements emerging from one of France's most infamous scandals.

Transcript

[Verizon Representative]

Now at Verizon, we have some big news for your peace of mind for all our customers, existing and new, we're locking in low prices for three years guaranteed on MyPlan and MyHome. That's future youe Peace of mind and everyone can save on a brand new phone on MyPlan. When you trade in any phone from one of our top brands, that's new phone peace of mind because at Verizon, whether you're already a customer or you're just joining us, we got you. Visit Verizon today. Price guarantee applies to then current base monthly rate. Additional terms and conditions apply for all offers.

[Land Rover Representative]

Are you a trailblazer, a risk taker? Even the boldest starts somewhere and the Legendary Defender it's ready for your next great adventure. Capable, iconic, reimagined this may join fellow adventure seekers at Destination Defender in Port Jervis, New York May 16th through the 18th. Outdoor activities, delicious food, live music. An unforgettable weekend for Defender owners and enthusiasts. To learn more, please visit DestinationDefenderUSA.com and explore the full Defender lineup at Land.

[Holly Fry]

RoverUSA.com Our skin tells a Story Join me, Holly Fry and a slate of incredible guests as we are all inspired by their journeys with psoriasis. Along with these uplifting and candid personal histories, we take a step back into the bizarre and occasionally poisonous history of our skin and how we take care of it. Whether you're looking for inspiration on your own skincare journey or are curious about the sometimes strange history of how we treat our skin, you'll find genuine, empathetic, transformative conversations here on our skin. Listen to our skin on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Dan Snow]

Hi everyone. Welcome to Dan Snow's History Hit. It didn't look like something that would rip the French nation apart. The offending item was a list written on such thin notepaper that it was almost transparent. It had been snatched from the German Embassy in Paris. It had been sent there by a traitor. It was military intelligence drawn from within France's army, destined for France's most hated enemy, the Germans. What was weird about this piece of paper that plunged France into decades long crisis was that the list of intelligence on it wasn't really that interesting. Or it was a bunch of things that this spy thought his German chiefs might be interested in. He had news of a hydraulic brake on a prototype 120mm gun. Ironically, this gun was an utter flop. The French army wouldn't even put it into production. He also promised that he had intel about a new artillery manual and he had some gossip about an upcoming military expedition to Madagascar. There was nothing promised by the French spy in this list that would really threaten French national security. But the reaction to the discovery that this spy existed, well, that shook the French Republic to its root. It was signed simply with the letter D. French counterintelligence searched for this spy. They searched for D. In the end, they found a scapegoat, an artillery officer named Alfred Dreyfus. He was a bit unpopular with those in higher command. He was not very clubbable, you might say so, not very sociable. He was independently wealthy. He was sort of personally awkward. He was very, very smart. So he was very able. And he was Jewish. He was put on trial. He was exiled to a tiny island off the coast of South America where he had an almost complete breakdown of his mental health and almost lost his life. He was brought back for retrial. There was a cover up, there was a conspiracy. It all exposed terrible divisions within France. It sucked much of Europe into the drama. It asked the very biggest questions about how we should all live together in modern states. It asked big questions about truth itself and about how the public engage with politics. As a result, the so called Dreyfus affair became one of the, well, infamous, one of the most remembered, talked about events in late 19th century European history. And here talk all about it, we've got Ruth Harris, she's a professor of modern history at the University of Oxford. She focuses on the history of modern Europe in the 19th and 20th centuries. And she wrote the remarkable prize winning book, the man on Devil's Alfred Dreyfus and the Affair that Divided France. So let's get into it. Dreyfus miscarriage of justice, conspiracies. The event that severed church from state in France. The event that shocked the world and inspired Zionism. Enjoy.

[Ruth Harris]

T minus 10 atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima. God save the King. No black white unity till there is.

[Land Rover Representative]

First some black unity.

[Ruth Harris]

Never to go to war with one another again. And liftoff. And the shuttle has cleared the tower.

[Dan Snow]

Ruth, thank you very much for coming on the podcast. Tell me, what is the starting gun for this legendary Dreyfus affairs?

[Ruth Harris]

It's a very interesting story because France evolves a counterintelligence agency within a reformed army. They've been defeated in 1870-71. They've experienced a civil war and now we're in the 1890s and they are very keen to operate a surveillance system on Germany. They call this little agency the statistical section and they've caught several spies. And their most important person in this operation is a char woman named Madame Bastien who works in the German Embassy and in the apartments of the German diplomat in Paris. And they tear up their documents and drop the scraps into wastebaskets. She's been there since 1889. She's retrieved all kinds of intelligence. And in 1894 she picks up a torn note. And it shows very poor intelligence, but it shows clearly that there's a spy at Loos inside France. And this thing is called the Bordereau. And immediately, almost immediately, suspicion falls on a Jewish artillery officer from a wealthy Alsatian family. In fact, a fabulously wealthy Alsatian family. His family is in textiles. His wife's family is in diamonds. His name is Alfred Dreyfus, and he's a very interesting man because he's a super patriot. He's one of the people that. There are a lot of them in France who are Alsatians, and they've left Alsace to come to France and taken over French patriot and Ruth, people might.

[Dan Snow]

Not know the reason they've all left Alsace is because it's no longer in France.

[Ruth Harris]

Exactly. It's no longer in France. And they've dedicated their future lives to taking over and getting back and reincorporating these lost territories that they lost in 1870-71.

[Dan Snow]

Because Alsace and Lorraine, these two territories next to the Rhine in France, they were taken by the Germans. And lots of people are swearing that France one day will get them back.

[Ruth Harris]

And indeed they do get them back. They get them back in 1918 and they are still part of France and in 1945. Exactly. But what's so interesting about this part of France is that many people there don't speak French. And what's so interesting is that Alfred Dreyfus is seen as foreign on two counts. He speaks French with a German accent, and of course he's Jewish. And the military is full of these Alsatians. And they're going to be on both sides of the affair. They're going to be people who are on the pro Dreyfusart camp, and they're going to be on the right Dreyfusart camp. And they're Catholics, Protestants and Jews. And it's not surprising that they're all there. They're all there because they want very much to get an efficient army that will reincorporate these lost provinces and their homeland. So what happens next is that he is. There's evidence, and it's very poor evidence, but he's Brought up before a court martial.

[Dan Snow]

Why do they think it's him? What's he done?

[Ruth Harris]

Well, they think it's him because they make him write his handwriting, and there's a slight resemblance between his handwriting and this thing called the boudorot. And also they immediately suspect him because he's one of those people that is seen as somehow not part of the gang. And it's a very interesting thing. He's very reserved. He comes in ninth in the competitive examinations, even though one of the examiners has completely failed him. He's seen as, in that regard, the ultimate Jew who is making a case for himself through the new meritocratic system. And so the people who are suspicious of him are also often aristocrats, men who've come up from the ranks and they're convinced that it's him. And this is where the original antisemitism is hard not to acknowledge. And he's not allowed to see anyone. And it just goes on and on. And in fact, he's brought up before the court martial. There's evidence that he's not allowed to see because it's seen as national security. His lawyer is not used to working inside a military tribunal. And in the end, he is degraded in front of a massive crowd in Ecole Mediterre in Paris. And they chop off his epaulettes and they break his sword. In fact, they break the sword in advance and then re solder it so it can be broken more dramatically, which is an extraordinary aspect of the whole ritualized dimension of this. And they're screaming, down with the Jews. Down with the Judas. So there's a reenactment of an almost primordial biblical scene that goes on. And what's so extraordinary is that he's meant to be going to New Caledonia for life imprisonment. And in that case, his wife would be able to join him. But they come up with a special punishment for him, and that is that he will be taken to this place, Devil's island, and placed in solitary confinement. There's fears that he will escape. So after a few months, they build a palisade around him. He's not allowed to see anything but the sky, and at night he's manacled to the bed. So what's interesting again is this idea of the Enlightenment France. But he almost becomes the man with the iron mask. It's as if we go back to the Anciem regime and the guards are not allowed to speak to him. So he almost goes mad.

[Dan Snow]

You mentioned this sort of outburst of antisemitism in France. Now you're saying it. There are similarities, aren't there, with Germany after the First World War, 1870-71, France has been humiliated, it's lost territory, it's been utterly defeated by its traditional enemies, the Germans. Were there voices saying it's because somehow it was the fault of the Jews or these other groups within France who were insufficiently patriotic? Do you see similar currents there?

[Ruth Harris]

Absolutely. That is the current, and if anything, the Republic seems to intensify that current. There's always aspects of antisemitism that float around. But in the years leading up to the affair, there's a growing amount of both wounded patriotism and disaffection from the Republic. And it's very interesting. You have first the Boulanger affair, where there's a populist general who almost has a coup d'etat because he's seen as somehow the man of the hour who's going to restore France to its glory. And in the end, the Republic undermines him and says, look, you can't. We're going to arrest you for conspiracy. And he runs away to Belgium and shoots himself. Then there's the Panama scandal. And this is really important because right before Dreyfus is a Panama scandal. It comes out in 1892, 93, and over 800,000 small investors, almost all of them Catholic, lose their money in the scam surrounding the Panama Canal Company. And the people involved in that, Baron Reinach, he's a Jew. And we all know from the losses of Our Own Financial 2007, 2008, that this loss is so shattering to people. And it's seen as both Jews and Republicans who have taken bribes, have been corrupt and who've not cared for the poor man on the street. And it's not surprising then that it's Drumont, the famous antisemitic journalist, who starts a rag called La Libre Parole, the free word. And what he does is the whole paper is designated for antisemitism, and that's what it writes about. It talks about conspiracy, it talks about Jewish magic. And he himself wears a mandrake root around his neck to ward off the effusions from Jews, to prevent himself from being affected by Jews. And although people on the Catholic right, who are more have more integrity, worry about him, they nonetheless know him and deal with him. So that includes the Jesuits, who are running the schools that feed the army, and people who are very opposed to the Republic. So antisemitism becomes a very important ingredient here, and with it, an obsession with conspiracy. And again, that's very important, I think, about the past and present relationship of the Dreyfus affair.

[Dan Snow]

You mentioned people that are the Republicans, the Jews, these are the sort of liberal elites. They're multi confessional, they might be secular. They are running this republican experiment. You know, they don't want aristocrats, kings, popes and that kind of thing. And then again lined up against them the forces of sort of conservatism, Catholics claiming they speak for the overlooked man in the provinces. The kind of people that are losing their money in these schemes run by these kind of big city slickers.

[Ruth Harris]

Exactly.

[Dan Snow]

It does all sound a little bit.

[Ruth Harris]

Familiar, but it's also very interesting because one of the problems is like all these kinds of debates where people are so divided, there's elements of truth. It's true that these people are small investors and many of them are Catholic and they lose their money. And on the other side, what's going on is that the Republic has taken over primary education, they've secularized the schools, they have secularized the hospitals. And so those people on the other side feel that all kinds of institutions that were central to traditional society are being eaten away by this elite. It's not many of whom, it's only a few, but they see them as Protestants and Jews because they are the ones who are seen as benefiting the most from these new meritocratic standards.

[Dan Snow]

As you're describing this, I'm suddenly understanding why this, on paper people might be thinking, well, this is a slightly obscure case of espionage or rightly or wrongly accused in the 19th century. Why have we all heard of the Dreyfus effect? Why is it the most famous event in 9th century France, post Napoleon? Is it because actually it just encapsulates this really gigantic struggle at the heart of French life in the late 19th century.

[Ruth Harris]

I think it does encapsulate this tremendous struggle. But I also think that one of the reasons that it's figured so prominently is is it a harbinger for fascism in the 20th century? Is the kind of antisemitism that's unleashed a harbinger? Do we trace it back to here? Now, I've argued in my books and elsewhere that we can't read history backwards in that way, though it's tempting because the level of antisemitism is so extreme and so violent, we tend to associate it with Germany. But I think at this juncture you really see a tremendous amount of it in France. And given that France is supposedly the home of the Enlightenment, it's even more jarring. But I think you're right. It does encapsulate, but it also makes people believe that there are only two sides. And that's what's very interesting, two monolithic blocks. When in fact, at the beginning of the affair, you'll find amongst the intellectuals many people who didn't know which side to go on. And that's fascinating as well, because that raises the whole question about where people's loyalties lie. And of course, what happens is the intellectuals say I we are the purveyors of truth and justice, and you are tradition, and you're willing to stoop to anything in the name of your patriotism. It's a false loyalty. So again, it's about universalism versus the nation, and the nation conceived as something not French, and hence the emphasis on antisemitism.

[Dan Snow]

You listen to Dance Knows History. We're talking about the Dreyfus affair. More coming up.

[Land Rover Representative]

Are you a trailblazer, a risk taker? Even the boldest starts somewhere. And the legendary Defender it's ready for your next great adventure? Capable, iconic, reimagined this may Join fellow adventure seekers at Destination Defender in Port Jervis, New York, May 16th through the 18th. Outdoor activities, delicious food, live music, an unforgettable weekend for Defender owners and enthusiasts. To learn more, please visit DestinationDefenderUSA.com and explore the full Defender lineup at Land RoverUSA.com Our skin tells a Story Join.

[Holly Fry]

Me, Holly Fry, and a slate of incredible guests as we are all inspired by their journeys with psoriasis. Along with these uplifting and candid personal histories, we take a step back into the bizarre and occasionally poisonous history of our skin and how we take care of it. Whether you're looking for inspiration on your own skincare journey or are curious about the sometimes strange history of how we treat our skin, you'll find genuine empathetic transformers informative conversations here on our skin. Listen to our skin on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Dan Snow]

So this affair becomes the lens through which everyone starts to engage in a debate about the nature of Frenchness, the nature of modernity. I mean, the biggest possible question is about how we live together in a society.

[Ruth Harris]

I agree. And I think that for those who participated in Remember, Dreyfus is condemned in 1894. He's condemned again in 1899 in the split Verdict.

[Dan Snow]

So whilst he's in this terrible confinement off the coast of South America, off the coast of Guyana in South America, there's huge debates are there and attempts to get retrials and it's all rumbling on.

[Ruth Harris]

Exactly. Yes, but he's not exonerated until 1906. This goes on forever, over 20 years. But, yes, what you're saying is really true. I mean, it's only through Zola's intervention, the famous novelist Emile Zola, who writes an open letter in a newspaper leroire called Jacuze, I accuse you. And until this time, in the end of 1897, 1898, people keep on trying to fix it behind the scenes. They keep on saying, we have all this evidence to prove that he's not the man. There's already been somebody who's come up and said, look, the handwriting I know because I'm a stockbroker. And the real culprit's handwriting on the borderhole, because it's been published in the press, was one of my clients. His name is Wilson Esterhazy. They know for a long time who is the guy. So that's extraordinary. But it's Zola who comes out and he writes this extraordinary letter. He's a magnificent wordsmith. He writes with such verb. It comes off almost like a song. They employ all these children on the street to market, say, Jacques, Jacques, Jacques. 300,000 people buy the paper that day. There's a paper shortage. They have to find extra paper. So it's an extraordinary thing. Zola gets a lot of things wrong, too. He exaggerates this and that, but it's after that that the affair blows and it becomes a public affair. And that's why people take up these positions that seem almost existential and they demonize each other. And one of the problems is Zola is a very, very controversial figure. I mean, he's often portrayed as a pig. His literature is seen as a kind of violent naturalism opposed to Catholicism. Very, very dirty in every sense, sexualized. And so it only increases the right in their detestation of the Dreyfusag. And that's something that people don't realize because people think, oh, Zola was a great champion, but of course, it was very ambivalent for them. And in the end, he has to leave to England.

[Dan Snow]

So in the same way that on social media, either side get very excited when, quote, unquote, you dunk on the other side, you produce the absolute killer post or video or tweet. But in fact, that only enrages the other side even more. It gives heart to your fans, but it enrages the other side.

[Ruth Harris]

It's exactly what happened. And we have to remember that we're in an age of mass circulation papers, and we're finally in an age of almost complete literacy because of the Republic, making sure that everybody goes to school so everyone has access to this stuff, and that's why it's so important. And I think, again, that's a past and present parallel that's very important in thinking about why people were so riled. And what's so interesting is that again, despite all this evidence, the army rejects and rejects and rejects Dreyfus's innocence. The first person to discover it isn't Dreyfus. Colonel Picard. He's imprisoned.

[Dan Snow]

He's imprisoned. Wow.

[Ruth Harris]

He's imprisoned? Yes. Yes, he's imprisoned. They try to send him away, and he's imprisoned for a time. And all this time, Dreyfus knows nothing about it. He keeps on writing to his superiors, asking them to exonerate him and to reopen the investigation. And one of them is his chiefs. He doesn't realize that one of the people involved that he's writing to to get help is in fact, one of the conspirators. It's an ugly story.

[Dan Snow]

And what happens to Esterhazy? This stockbroker goes, this is one of my clients. I know that handwriting. Does Esterhausey get dragged in front of a tribunal?

[Ruth Harris]

Well, he does, but he never gets convicted and he ends up living in England. So, you see, it's an extraordinary story. I think that what is so interesting, again, is that we have the final coup de grace, and that is the forgery that is done by a man named Henrietta. And they discover it. It's two pieces of paper that are put together very badly to incriminate Dreyfus. And they bring him in and they recognize that he's forged this.

[Dan Snow]

Wow. So the army are now. They've gone from wrongly convicting to actively trying to cover up and create a case against Dreyfus. Okay.

[Ruth Harris]

Yes. And now what's going on is, again, this notion of loyalty. He is doing it out of loyalty. But of course, he's engaged in criminal activity. He's brought before his superiors, and after an hour, he admits that he's done it. They put him in prison, and then he kills himself. Now, you'd think that after that, that would have been the end, but it's not. That's the moment when Charles Maurois, who becomes a very important supporter of vichy in the 1940s, comes out with this extraordinary. In his newspaper, defense of Henry as the true patriot and creates a martyrology around him. He also solicits what they call the Monument Henri. And what that is is all these denunciations of Dreyfus and Jews, and these are all published. And so we get this is why the hideous discussions of the fantasies of Jew hatred, some of which are really unspeakable. And in the end, it still doesn't mean that Dreyfus comes back, but he does, finally, in 1899.

[Dan Snow]

And this is something that if you go to a provincial French town square, you'd have been involved in this discussion. Would this have reached every kind of corner of France?

[Ruth Harris]

Well, that's what's so interesting, because of the ups and downs and the lulls. I think there are times when everybody's talking about it. There are riots and demonstrations around Zola's trial for defamation. But then there are times when it's just calm. And what I think is interesting is it's almost as we have today. The commentariat are involved in their wars in the press and online, and many people don't know what's going on. So I think that's also really interesting because many people care, and then there are periods where they don't care. And I think that's actually much more honest appraisal. I think people who write about the Dreyfus affair don't acknowledge this. There are riots in Algeria over this. So it's also that part of France that is in North Africa or perceived as being French. In North Africa, there are riots, or some people even call them Pogroms in 1898 in various parts of France. But then there are other places where people don't seem to be that riled about it. They see it as a Parisian affair. So it depends where you are, what time is going on, and the level of engagement. And that is what they use that term in French, engagement, this idea that even if you're an intellectual or a professor or a writer, you must engage, because without it, these standards of truth and justice fall to nothing.

[Dan Snow]

So you mentioned that he was tried again in 1899 and found guilty.

[Ruth Harris]

Yes, and it's a very interesting story because you can imagine he comes back and people don't like him. I mean, this is what is so extraordinary. He comes back and he's extremely reserved man. He's lost much of his teeth because of the malnutrition and what he's gone through. He's like a stick figure. He's so thin, he's so unexercised, and he has to stuff his old uniform as he walks into the court. And it comes across as very mechanical, and he's got a monotone voice. He's doing everything he can to keep himself upright. You know the French. Like, they want verve, they want eloquence, they want a hero who's been victimized, and he gives them none of that. He hates melodrama, he hates excess. He's a very reserved man. And the Dreyfusas, who are expecting exoneration, then realize that things are going against them and they can't believe it. Picard, the person who has defended him, is not even allowed to appear in uniform because he's been imprisoned and he's seen as a conspirator by the army. So the effect that they are searching for does not happen. And he is convicted a second time, which is just extraordinary. And nobody writes about this, nobody wants to talk about how this could happen. But it's almost a split decision. He's for 10 years in prison and then it says extenuating circumstances. It's a verdict like no other in French history, and it's terrible.

[Dan Snow]

Listen to Dan Snow's history. Hit more Dreyfus affair after this.

[Land Rover Representative]

Are you a trailblazer, a risk taker? Even the boldest starts somewhere. And the legendary Defender it's ready for your next great adventure. Capable, iconic, reimagined this may Join fellow adventure seekers at Destination Defender in Port Jervis, New York, May 16th through the 18th. Outdoor activities, delicious food, live music, unforgettable weekend for Defender owners and enthusiasts. To learn more, please visit DestinationDefenderUSA.com and explore the full Defender lineup at Land RoverUSA.com Our skin tells a Story Join.

[Holly Fry]

Me, Holly Fry, and a slate of incredible guests as we are all inspired by their journeys with psoriasis. Along with these uplifting and candid personal histories, we take a step back into the bizarre and occasional, occasionally poisonous history of our skin and how we take care of it. Whether you're looking for inspiration on your own skincare journey or are curious about the sometimes strange history of how we treat our skin, you'll find genuine, empathetic, transformative conversations here on our skin. Listen to our skin on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Dan Snow]

And in that second trial, the army know without a doubt that they have found their spy and it was Esterhazy.

[Ruth Harris]

It's not clear because we don't know what those military judges were thinking. There's so many stories, so many tales about how he could have done it still that it's not clear. But there is obviously a profound uncertainty because of the Split decision. And I think what's so interesting is that in the end, the brothers Dreytfuss has a brother named Mathieu. They work for a pardon, and a pardon is not exoneration. So many of the most extreme Dreyfusart are upset that he wants a pardon. They want him to go back to prison because they feel that they have to prove that he's not guilty. But of course, the brothers and many of his closest, especially Jewish associates know that he will die if he goes to prison.

[Dan Snow]

Yeah, it's very interesting. This is not a story of everyone realizing about a miscarriage of justice, apologizing and moving on together. This is a story of a bitterly divided, split contest in the end with the presidential pardon. It doesn't sound to me like any of the people who had spent all those years harassing and declaiming Dreyfus. None of them sort of said, oh, look, I've just reviewed the evidence. It turns out I don't think he's guilty. I mean, this is not a heartwarming story from that point of view.

[Ruth Harris]

What I find most disturbing about the affair is that it's sordid. People try to make it heroic. But the second condemnation is a really disturbing story. I mean, there is so much evidence, and I think again, this is a past and present story, that we tend to think that rational demonstration shifts people's views. But what the case demonstrates is how that is just not true. That in fact the Dreyfusart are often seen as censorious school marmy, using their status as teachers, professors, intellectuals to lecture people on the other side who keep on insisting, I know what I know. I think that's again, really important to think about today, because that whole idea of constantly producing evidence has not shifted our own political climate like some of us think it should. So it suggests something very different. And the other aspect of the case after the second court martial is that everyone in the affair, even those who had committed all these crimes, are equally amnestied. So the Dreyfusaurs are just horrified that the men who participated in the conspiracy against Dreyfus are not going to be going to prison. So it's a very disturbing case. And those who want on the other side to get Dreyfus back in prison because they have to fight to the end. His family and especially his brother are convinced that he will die if he goes back to prison. And so they do everything to save him. And it takes years for him to recover. He has terrible nightmares and he's broken. He seems broken. He isn't broken. He actually is a service officer. He works in the army during World War I. Finally.

[Dan Snow]

Extraordinary.

[Ruth Harris]

Yeah. But he feels broken.

[Dan Snow]

So, yeah, he serves during World One. His son fights all the way through World War I.

[Ruth Harris]

Exactly.

[Dan Snow]

For a family that was said to be traitorous, it's remarkable.

[Ruth Harris]

There isn't anything but.

[Dan Snow]

Does the Dreyfus affair have serious constitutional or just political implications for the French state?

[Ruth Harris]

I think it has endless implications in ways that are still reverberating and that often are not intuitive. First of all, in the aftermath, when the Republicans do get back into power, they're so angry at what they see as the Catholic conspiracy that they start to purge the army of Catholic officers. It's called the Affair des Fiches. So they take revenge. And even if these are people who just are part of Vincent de Paul Society, these are people who visit the sick in Catholic hospitals, they're Catholics who visit the sick. They are now being watched and their promotions slowed. So there's a revenge tactic. Of course. It sets up the dynamic for the separation of church and state in 1905. And it's, as I said, only in 1906 that they decide they will be able to break the military judgment in the Corps de Cassation, the highest court. They break the judgment, and he is finally exonerated. But, of course, when Zola is brought into the Pantheon, Dreyfus is one of the pallbearers, and somebody shoots him. It's just a little nothing. But it just goes to show that it's just very hard for people to let this go, and that it has to do with profound passions on both sides. And I think that the whole idea of the engagement of the intellectuals, it's very important, for example, to Leon Blom during the Popular Front government in the 1930s. He's a young man during the affair, but just as he's about to take power, the 1930s, he writes a memoir called Souvenir Souv la Fere. And he's trying to get people again to engage in the Popular Front by bringing back the glory days of the Dreyfus affair. And then again, during the Algerian war, it's the intellectuals who are trying to save France from these postcolonial horrors in North Africa. So these things are very important in the left, but it's also really important in the right. Even 20 years ago, there were still families who thought Dreyfus was guilty. So it's part also, it has a dynastic dimension in the political psyche. It goes down, it's transferred from one generation to the other. And I think it's very important to realize how rigid these typologies were and how it affects people in especially moments of crisis.

[Dan Snow]

Should we finish by looking at one other legacy? A young journalist, an Austrian journalist, Theodore Herzl, was watching the affair closely and he came away with a very profound conclusion.

[Ruth Harris]

Well, he believes what's important is that Jews will never be able to properly assimilate in France and in Europe in general. And he argues for a Zionist solution. He doesn't seem quite aware that in promoting a Jewish form of nationalism and self determination, he's adding to the nationalisms that are part of the kind of blind emotional passion of the affair itself. The persecution and the consolidation of the right terrifies him. And when he meets Jews, French Jews, he thinks they're not willing to stand up for themselves and instead he argues for the establishment of a state of Israel. It's very interesting. He's just one amongst many. It's one of the people we know. But what's interesting, it's not just him, it's one of the earliest dreyfusarts, a man named Bernard Lazare, who comes out of the affair, also on the left, thinking that the only solution for Europe's antisemitism is a Jewish state. And of course, we can't help but wonder how all of this works as the Dreyfus affair goes into muted memory. And of course, by the 1930s, antisemitism roars up to the center of political culture again, all pretty much across the continent.

[Dan Snow]

Well, Ruth Harris, thank you very much for coming on the podcast, telling us all about this remarkable episode. Your brilliant book, the man on Devil's Alfred Dreyfus and the Affair that Divided France won all sorts of prizes, rightly so. Thank you very much for, for coming on the podcast.

[Ruth Harris]

Thank you so much.

[Holly Fry]

Our Skin tells a story. Join me, Holly Fry, and a slate of incredible guests as we are all inspired by their journeys with psoriasis. Along with these uplifting and candid personal histories, we take a step back into the bizarre and occasionally poisonous history of our skin and how we take care of it. Whether you're looking for inspiration on your own skincare journey or are curious about the sometimes strange history of how we treat our skin, you'll find genuine, empathetic, transformative conversations here on our skin. Listen to our skin on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.