Loading summary
Capital One Bank Advertiser
With no fees or minimums on checking accounts, it's no wonder the Capital One bank guy is so passionate about banking. With Capital One, if he were here, he wouldn't just tell you about no fees or minimums. He'd also talk about how most Capital One cafes are open seven days a week to assist with your banking needs. Yep, even on weekends it's pretty much all he talks about in a good way. What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See capitalone.com bank capital1NA member FDIC.
Back Market Advertiser
This intelligence podcast is sponsored by Back Market, the leading global marketplace for refurbished tech. When the kids need phones, laptops or tablets for school, buying refurbished tech makes sense for families trying to save money without sacrificing quality. At Back Market, tech costs up to 50% less compared to new. All devices have been professionally refurbished and come with a 1 year warranty and 30 day return policy. Start saving money. Visit Backmarket or the Back Market app to shop now.
Jason Palmer
The economist. Hello and welcome to the Intelligence from the Economist. I'm Jason Palmer. Today on the show why so called macro trading is hard both for man and machine and the mystery street artist taking over cities. But first, Government ministers come and go all the time, all over the world. But in India, the resignation of Dharmendra Pradhan, the Education Minister over the weekend was seismic. It was driven by growing youth protests and the youth were ecstatic. A mild mannered movement that started as a jokey meme has become very, very serious for India's leader.
Kira Huyu
We've had 12 years of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's rule and in those 12 years we have never before seen a cabinet minister resign due to public press.
Jason Palmer
Kira Huyu is our Asia Correspondent and has been reporting from the protests in Delhi.
Kira Huyu
I had not been expecting this resignation. Frankly, I don't think that all of the cockroaches were expecting the resignation and now it goes far beyond that. This I think is the beginning of a new culture of dissent and accountability in India.
Jason Palmer
Now at the mention of cockroaches. They have been talked about on the show before, but let's do a little reminder. Who are they?
Kira Huyu
So back in May, India's Chief justice seemed to compare India's jobless youth to cockroaches. A tweet appeared on the social media platform X that just said what if all cockroaches came together? And that was a tweet by a guy called Abhijit Dipke who at the time was a student in Boston. And that single tweet basically morphed into a satirical online meme that then became this huge youth movement that seems to have struck a nerve. So you went from most obviously quite amusing Instagram content, last time I checked a couple of minutes ago, they currently have 27 million followers. Lots of AI images of fist raising cockroaches set to Hindi rap. But underneath all of this, there's actually a much more serious message.
Jason Palmer
Go on.
Kira Huyu
So there is this All India exam called neet, which you have to do if you want to get into medical school in India. And there was a leak which really upended the dreams of more than 2 million exam takers. And so there's a lot of corruption. That leak has since then been linked to more than 20 suicides among students trying to take that test. And so now you have this perfect storm where India has this insanely competitive exam culture. It's very hard to get into some of the few good quality colleges. And then if you do get into those colleges, despite all these scams, there's very few jobs at the end of that line. And now you have India's Chief justice telling you you're a cockroach.
Jason Palmer
So that's how the movement got so much force behind it. But how have we got to this quite exciting stage now with the resignation? And so.
Kira Huyu
So earlier this month, on the 18th of July, you had plainclothes cops arrive at the protest site in Delhi, throw white sheets over this veteran activist called Sonam Bangchok, and then ferry his frail body against his will to a government hospital. And from there, he continued to record videos in support of the protests. Sonam Ji, as he is known, was on day 21 of his hunger strike in support of this idea that the minister needed to resign. And if you talk to the protesters, they talk about this as a kidnapping. Tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands, staged Delhi's biggest protest in more than half a decade. I described these protests as originally very peaceful, very patriotic. Students were clutching copies of the Constitution. There was someone who was dressed up as Gandhi holding a sign that said world Peace. All of this was because the bjp, Narendra Modi's party, has a habit of branding all of its critics as anti national. And so the protesters really went out of their way to show that, if anything, they are here to do their patriotic duty to defend the future of the country. Now, unfortunately, less than three hours after I first saw Gandhi holding a sign saying World Peace, riot police without name tags started beating up protesters with sticks and firing tear gas at them. Police were later found to have used Pellet guns. And that's a weapon that previously had only been used in conflict ridden Kashmir. All across central Delhi, the Internet was actually illegally shut down. So it was quite hard for me to move around or contact anyone. You also had 17 metro stations closed down as the authorities tried to stop anyone from coming. They couldn't really do that. The crowds kept coming anyway.
Jason Palmer
So as you moved around when you could, what were people telling you?
Kira Huyu
They were saying that the resignation is key. They're not going to go before the education minister goes. But you very quickly got a sense that this protest had become about much more than just that one single resignation. I'm going to record you. Is that okay?
Yash Mishra
Yeah. But my voice is not very.
Kira Huyu
I understand. How many days have you been fasting?
Yash Mishra
Today is my ninth day.
Kira Huyu
Ninth day I spoke to 28 year old hunger striker Yash Mishra.
Yash Mishra
Education is like water. It is the most important commodity. And the government of India, Mr. Modi is failing and he has no way, no policy which he can use to actually get things back on track.
Kira Huyu
Most of India is young. About 65% are under 35. And many of those feel doomed. 25% are not in college or jobs or training. There are all these exam leaks. We've had about 150 known cases in the last decade alone. And India seems to not really be investing in what it calls its demographic dividend, AKA its young people. India says it wants to spend about 6% of its GDP on public education, but the current figure is closer to 4%. But it was something else actually that Yash said that I found most interesting. How are you feeling?
Yash Mishra
I am feeling very good. Energetic.
Kira Huyu
Energetic. What gives you energy?
Yash Mishra
The fear that we have induced in the government.
Kira Huyu
Tell me more about the fear. The conversation with Yash kept coming back to these bigger themes. And similarly, when I spoke to a lot of my friends, most of whom were at these protests, not young anymore, mid-30s, they weren't just talking about paper leaks. They were talking about a broken system. We've had more than a decade now of under the bjp, of a shrinking space for dissent. India used to be this very loud and boisterous democracy. People have gotten quite scared now of publicly criticizing Narendra Modi. And all of a sudden you get a sense that the younger generation, it's not just that they aren't scared anymore. Even more fatally they are cracking jokes about Narendra Modi and how has the
Jason Palmer
BJP or more to the point, how has Narendra Modi responded to all of this?
Kira Huyu
Modi first Tried ignoring the protest. Then he tried announcing a bunch of policy changes that had not been on the cockroaches list of demand. And then he seemed to be panicking. So we were treated to this really unusual late night video from a usually very stage managed, very image conscious prime minister. He was holding the camera himself really uncomfortably close to his own nostrils. And he apologized in a very candid way, acknowledging the students pain. But it seems to have been too late. Denzi responded with mock online tutorials, guiding their prime minister on more appropriate lighting and camera and script for viral videos. And so I think Modi got a sense that there was no way of winning these students back unless he caved
Jason Palmer
to their demands, which he has now done, which you say is extraordinarily unusual. Where does this go from here?
Kira Huyu
Mordi's image is that of a strongman leader who doesn't bow to the public. He doesn't accept traditional notions of democratic accountability. He hasn't in all this time taken a single press conference in which the press could hold him to account. So it seems that something could be pretty fundamentally shifting. It might be that going forward performance and public support actually matter for staying a minister. It might mean that the stronghold of the traditional media, which has mostly stopped criticizing Maudi, is breaking because Gen Z will just come with their own cameras and phones and film it all for the world to see. The cockroaches have gone home. I hope that they all have a long warm shower and a meal. We don't really know what's going to happen with the movement, where that new culture of dissent is going to go. But from the conversations I have had in true Gen Z style with a lot of these protesters on Instagram, they are saying, look, we've had this really historic win in quite a short period of time. There's no way that we're not going to be back on Parliament street the next time that the government thinks they can take us for granted. Now the reality check on all of this is that BJP is actually just fresh off a string of state election victories in May. It is politically strong across the country and frankly the country's opposition is not very impressive or particularly united. But I think Indians wake up this week to a country that feels bolder and louder and younger.
Jason Palmer
Kira, thanks very much for joining us.
Kira Huyu
Thank you for having me.
Capital One Bank Advertiser
With no fees or minimums on checking accounts, it's no wonder the Capital One bank guy is so passionate about banking with Capital One. If he were here, he wouldn't just tell you about no fees or minimums. He'd also talk about how most Capital One cafes are open seven days a week to assist with your banking needs. Yep, even on weekends, it's pretty much all he talks about in a good way. What's in your wallet terms apply. See capitalone.com Bank.
Noom Advertiser
Losing weight can feel like a rollercoaster full of ups, downs and being thrown for loops. Like when someone brings donuts into the office or your kids Dino nuggets start giving you that look again. That's why there's Noom. They combine GLP1s to quiet the food noise with healthy habits that help you keep it quiet even if you get off the meds. Their program is designed to make weight loss a smooth ride, helping you understand what drives you so you can build better habits to not just lose weight, but keep it off. Noom lose for keeps. Get started@noom.com not all customers will clinically qualify for medications. Individual results may vary.
Josh Roberts
This is a copy of the Financial Times. Now, obviously, the headlines tell me news that's already happened. But imagine if instead they were telling me tomorrow's news. And I'm a trader. I buy and sell stocks and bonds. Rosie, how do you think I'm going to do?
Rosie
Well, Josh Roberts, you're our capital markets correspondent, so I assume you'd rake it in.
Josh Roberts
Well, you might think so, but a couple of researchers have actually done an experiment that is very like this. They invited 120 people to look at tomorrow's newspapers every day for 15 trading days and then place bets on stocks and bonds. And the surprise is even with that crystal ball, they actually did pretty badly.
Rosie
Okay, so Idiot's guide to markets here, by which I mean me, obviously, markets move on financial information, how businesses have done all sorts of things like that, but also on global trends, on political information, on data releases, that kind of thing. And yet you're saying that even if people knew what was going to happen, they'd still do badly on the stock market?
Josh Roberts
Yeah. Some of the biggest events that move markets, as you said, they're data releases, things like jobs reports. Is unemployment, how many jobs have been added to the economy? How is inflation doing? Are central banks going to move interest rates up or down? These are the sorts of events that the participants in the experiment were shown in tomorrow's news. If you know that the economy's added a lot of jobs, you might think the economy's growing quite quickly. That will cheer shareholders. Share prices are going to go up. You might place a bet in advance that shares are going to Go up. Similarly, if you think the Federal Reserve is going to raise interest rates, you might think that bonds are going to do badly because bond prices tend to fall when interest rates go up. However, even with that information, which you might think was the key that would unlock markets for you, yes, the participants didn't do particularly well in placing their trades.
Rosie
So how does this study work, Josh? Did they just give everyone a crystal ball and tell them to get on with it?
Josh Roberts
So, yeah, obviously we don't actually have access to tomorrow's headlines. This was a team of researchers at Elmwealth, which is an investment firm. And what they did was they picked 15 front pages of the Wall Street Journal between 2008 and 2022, and they recruited some participants, and they showed each participant for each of 15 trading days. Tomorrow's headline, then what you get to do is buy or sell stocks. You can buy or sell bonds. And they gave each participant leverage to do this with. So you could multiply your bet by up to 50 times. This is the sort of bet that hedge funds actually gets place in real life. At the end of the trading day, based on the actual market moves from that historical trading day, your trade gets closed out, and we do that 50 times. Now, each participant was given $50 to start with, and you might think that they made loads and loads of money, but actually only about half of them ended up with more money than they started. One in six went completely bust. They lost everything. And the average return was very small. The average person ended up finishing with about $51. So despite the crystal ball, they didn't do great.
Rosie
So what does all that mean? Why are we so bad?
Josh Roberts
One of the things is that even with tomorrow's news, it's surprisingly hard to guess the direction markets are going to move in. Markets don't just move based on the news that's happened. They move based on what people are already expecting. Say tomorrow there's a great jobs announcement. But everybody was already expecting that. Well, the news has already been priced into shares today, so I might see tomorrow's news, think our stocks are going to go up. But the economy added 100,000 jobs. People expected it was going to add 150,000 jobs. People are actually quite disappointed. So it's quite hard to work out the direction. And our participants here were not great at guessing directions. They got them right only about 51% of the time. So that tells you something of why they did badly. Even worse than this, though, is how they sized their bets. This turns out to be one of the hardest things to do in trading and investment, you want to be able to work out how confident you are in the move you're taking, and you want to be able to size your bet appropriately. Right? If you just think markets might go up tomorrow, you probably either wouldn't bet or you might bet a very small amount. If you feel really confident, this is definitely going to be an upward move. You should be able to take account of that and bet more. But what they found in this experiment is that people are very bad at doing that. They didn't size their bets according to how confident they were. And even when there was news they were shown that made it really, really likely that they had got their bet right, they didn't increase the size of their bets. Conversely, people took far too much risk and multiplied bets far too many times when they weren't very sure. And that's what led to people going bust.
Rosie
So we're bad at predicting what might happen, and we're bad at predicting how likely it is that that might happen.
Josh Roberts
There's another surprising element of this experiment, which is they then repeated it with artificial intelligence models. And even the artificial intelligence models did bad. They were a little bit better than humans at guessing the direction of markets. They got that about 60% of the time. But they were pretty much as bad at sizing their bets correctly. Even the machines, who are supposed to be our future overlords, took way too much risk, didn't really calibrate their bets according to how confident they were, and some of them lost money as well.
Rosie
Personally, I find that quite comforting. The machines aren't brilliant at this point. Is anyone any good at this?
Josh Roberts
Well, we might take some comfort from the fact that the professionals actually are quite good at this. Macro traders who bet on the things that we've been talking about, you know, direction of stocks and bonds based on economic and political trends. The researchers at Elmwealth recruited five expert macro traders and gave them the same test. As you might expect, they did rather well. All five of them finished with profits. On average. They over doubled their money. And actually the crucial distinction between them and the AI models and the lay participants, let's call them, was not that they were loads better at predicting directions, although they were a bit better at predicting directions. It was they changed their investment sizing massively according to their confidence. On some days, they chose not to bet at all. On days they felt very confident, they chose to massively ramp up the leverage of their bet. And it worked out very well for them. So we can take Some comfort from the fact that the people who do this day in, day out in Wall street, in the City of London, actually are quite good at it.
Rosie
Where does this leave the existential question, particularly working at the Economist? Are the markets rational? Are the rest of us irrational?
Josh Roberts
I think markets can be both rational and completely wrong. And what I mean by that is it may well be that markets aren't brilliant at predicting how much a company is going to earn in the future, how much the economy is going to grow in the future. But if I'm a participant in markets, I might not actually care about whether the prediction is accurate. I might just care about making money. So if I know that the market might incorrectly predict the future, but I think it's going to move in a certain direction, nevertheless, it makes sense for me to bet on that direction, even though it might lead to a price in the market that predicts the future incorrectly. I think the biggest lesson from this study, though, is that a lot of investors spend loads of time thinking about what they should be buying. Which stocks should I buy? Should I buy this government bond or that government bond? Should I lend to massive companies developing AI? We devote a lot of thought to those things, but almost, if not more important, is the question of how much. How confident am I that the particular investment I'm making is going to pay off? And can I quantify that? And how should I size my bet in order to take advantage of my confidence? This is actually possibly the most important question in investment, and it's one that I think we give too little thought to.
Rosie
Josh, thank you very much.
Josh Roberts
Rosie, thank you.
Caitlin Talbot
I'm in London walking towards Covent Garden, and I've heard that there's some invader mosaics. When I first started looking for mosaics by invader, I didn't quite know what to expect. I missed it at first, but I just found my first invader on James Street. It's much smaller than I imagined. I don't know what I was looking for. The first one I spotted was a tiny, yellow, pixelated creature. Bit of a rush when I found it. Took me longer than I would like to admit, and I had to walk back to find it. But I'm gonna flash it now.
Jason Palmer
Caitlin Talbot is a digital culture correspondent for the Economist.
Caitlin Talbot
The prolific French artist has planted more than 1,500 of his mosaics across Paris alone. There are now thousands of his artworks, which he calls invasions, in over 80 cities across the world. He is perhaps even busier than Banksy. His pixelated pictures have been affixed to the Eiffel Tower and the Hollywood sign. They even orbit Earth in International Space Station. Invader often works under the COVID of darkness, and like any serious street artist, his identity is a secret. But that hasn't stopped him from attracting fans. If you know a child in a city that has been invaded by the artworks, the chances are you've heard of Flash Invaders, an app on which you score points for finding or flashing the mosaics. So I found my second Invader on Maiden Lane, and it was a sort of ginger haired, pixelated man smoking a cigarette. Must admit, players, including me, have logged more than 47 million flashes to date. Invader uses the ancient practice of mosaic to create figures inspired by retro video games. Each tile acts as a perfect pixel, which makes the mosaics look like digital images. This pixelated effect also means the images can be scanned on a phone, a bit like a QR code to play Flash Invaders. The aim of the game is not only to interact with fans, says Invader, who spoke to me anonymously, but also to spark curiosity. By the end of my own exploration, I could see what he meant. I suppose one immediate observation would be that it forces you to look around more, down the routes where you would usually sort of walk. Mobile games are often criticized for gluing people to their phones, but this one teaches you to check your surroundings. Whether on a street in Covent Garden or at the top of the Eiffel Tower, it's always worth looking up.
Jason Palmer
That's all for this episode of the Intelligence. We'll see you back here tomorrow.
Capital One Bank Advertiser
With no fees or minimums on checking accounts, it's no wonder the Capital One bank guy is so passionate about banking with Capital One. If he were here, he wouldn't just tell you about no fees or minimums. He'd also talk about how most Capital One cafes are open seven days a week to assist with your banking needs. Yep, even on weekends, it's pretty much all he talks about in a good way. What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See capitalone.com bank capital1na member FDIC
Yash Mishra
Then
Josh Roberts
I thought, what if I've scaled businesses? What if I scaled my philanthropy? What if I did as much in one year as I've done in my whole life?
Capital One Bank Advertiser
See how your wealth could have even greater meaning@creativeplanning.com impact.
Date: July 27, 2026
Host: Jason Palmer (The Economist)
Key Correspondent: Kira Huyu (Asia Correspondent)
Notable Guest: Yash Mishra (Protest Hunger Striker)
This episode explores India's unprecedented youth-led protests that forced the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, marking an extraordinary moment in Indian politics under Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The discussion chronicles the origins of the "cockroach" protest movement, the escalation of demonstrations, the government’s increasingly desperate response, and the broader implications for dissent and accountability in India. The episode also features on-the-ground perspectives from protesters and analysis of shifting cultural and political dynamics.
Timestamps: [01:06–02:27]
“We have never before seen a cabinet minister resign due to public press.” [02:17]
Timestamps: [02:31–03:40]
"That leak has since then been linked to more than 20 suicides among students trying to take that test." [03:42]
Timestamps: [04:26–06:26]
“Students were clutching copies of the Constitution. There was someone who was dressed up as Gandhi holding a sign that said world Peace.” [04:47]
Timestamps: [06:29–07:57]
“Education is like water. It is the most important commodity. And the government of India, Mr. Modi is failing...” [06:55] “The fear that we have induced in the government.” [07:53]
Timestamps: [07:57–08:36]
Timestamps: [08:36–09:34]
“He was holding the camera himself really uncomfortably close to his own nostrils. And he apologized in a very candid way, acknowledging the students pain. But it seems to have been too late.” [08:40]
Timestamps: [09:34–11:02]
“There’s no way that we’re not going to be back on Parliament street the next time that the government thinks they can take us for granted.” [10:23, paraphrased]
On unprecedented accountability:
“We have never before seen a cabinet minister resign due to public press.”
— Kira Huyu [02:17]
On the meme movement’s transformation:
“You went from quite amusing Instagram content… to this huge youth movement.”
— Kira Huyu [02:54]
On youth frustration:
“Education is like water. It is the most important commodity. And the government of India, Mr. Modi is failing…”
— Yash Mishra [06:55]
On a new culture of fearlessness:
“It’s not just that they aren’t scared anymore. Even more fatally, they are cracking jokes about Narendra Modi.”
— Kira Huyu [07:57]
On Modi’s panicked response:
“We were treated to this really unusual late night video from a usually very stage managed, very image conscious prime minister... He apologized... but it seems to have been too late.”
— Kira Huyu [08:40]
On the movement’s resolve:
“There’s no way that we’re not going to be back on Parliament street the next time that the government thinks they can take us for granted.”
— Protesters, cited by Kira Huyu [10:23]
The episode vividly portrays how a dismissive insult blossomed into India’s most effective youth protest in decades, achieving a rare moment of political accountability. It offers firsthand insights from protesters and incisive analysis of the movement’s possible long-term effects on Indian democracy. As the “cockroach” generation finds its voice, questions linger about whether this bold new energy will reshape Indian politics for good—or provoke further pushback from a government unaccustomed to popular resistance.
The last word? India “wakes up to a country that feels bolder and louder and younger.” [11:02]