On goal difference: are America and Israel diverging on Iran?

Summary

---

Economist Podcasts – "On Goal Difference: Are America and Israel Diverging on Iran?"

Date: March 25, 2026
Episode Overview:
This episode of "The Intelligence" from The Economist dives into military and diplomatic developments between America and Israel in their ongoing confrontation with Iran, focusing on whether their goals and strategies are now diverging. It features an in-depth discussion with Anshul Pfeffer, Israel correspondent, and explores the complex interaction between military action, diplomatic negotiations, and political realities inside both Israel and the United States.

---

Main Theme

The episode interrogates recent developments in the military and diplomatic strategies toward Iran by America and Israel. It examines whether the two long-time allies, having begun the conflict with shared goals, are now parting ways in their definitions of “success” and their willingness to continue – or end – the conflict.

---

Segment Breakdown & Key Insights

1. Conflicting Victory Narratives

Timestamps: 01:44–02:52

• Discussion of President Trump’s Statements:
  Trump claims military and diplomatic successes, suggesting imminent regime change in Iran and hinting at concessions or "a very big present."
• Iran’s Official Stance:
  Official Iranian rhetoric denies that negotiations are happening, characterizing American positions as defeat disguised as negotiation.

Notable Quotes:

• "They did something yesterday that was amazing, actually. They gave us a present and the present arrived today."
  — John Fasman quoting President Trump (02:35)

• "The era of your promises is over. What in all this is Israel thinking?"
  — Jason Palmer (03:02)

---

2. Divergence of American and Israeli Objectives

Timestamps: 03:37–04:58

• Talks Dragging On & Israel’s Anxiety:
  Anshul Pfeffer asserts that Israel's biggest worry is that Trump might prioritize a quick end to the war on America’s terms, potentially disregarding Israel’s core interests.

• Military Context:
  While talks are ongoing, there’s a simultaneous intensification of military operations, including joint airstrikes and troop buildups.

Notable Quotes:

• "The main concern here in Israel is that Donald Trump will call time on this war without taking Israel's interests into consideration."
  — Anshul Pfeffer (03:46)

---

3. Military Operations and Strategic Aims

Timestamps: 04:58–07:19

• At the war's start, the US and Israel appeared united in seeking to topple the Iranian regime. But over three weeks, Trump refocused on securing the Strait of Hormuz and protecting oil flows—key American interests.

• Israel’s internal goal is to weaken the Iranian regime, sow public dissent, and foster conditions for popular uprising.

• Operations include not just airstrikes but narrative warfare, using media to encourage Iranian opposition.

Notable Quotes:

• "They're beaming into Iran pictures of besieged militia fleeing drones...showing to the Iranian people that the oppressors are now on the run. If they decide to take to the streets this time, they can do it."
  — Anshul Pfeffer (06:15)

• "To measure how much that's working, I think, is impossible even for the best intelligence services in the world."
  — Anshul Pfeffer (06:50)

---

4. Military Achievements: Incomplete Success

Timestamps: 07:19–08:25

• America and Israel have reportedly destroyed 75% of Iran’s missile launchers and flattened assembly lines, yet persistent missile attacks (10–15 per day) on Israel and the Gulf continue.

• Israel and other regional players worry that if talks end the war, Iran will retain some significant military capability, especially missiles.

---

5. Emerging Strategic Rift

Timestamps: 08:25–09:18

• Trump now frames “regime change” as having already occurred – effectively redefining success and negotiating with the same regime the war aimed to remove.

• Regional leaders, facing the prospect of living with a still-entrenched Iranian regime, fear America is declaring victory prematurely.

Notable Quotes:

• "Trump is basically talking to the regime that he and Netanyahu set out to remove at the beginning of this war. So he's now saying, well, we've done many things to this regime...He's changing the definition of regime change."
  — Anshul Pfeffer (08:35)

---

6. Israel’s Strategic Options

Timestamps: 09:18–11:21

• It’s unlikely Israel will continue military operations alone after an American ceasefire:

  • Operational interdependence is too high (joint missions, American refueling, etc.)
  • Any Trump-brokered agreement would “obligate Israel as well.”

• Netanyahu’s close relationship with Trump is a political asset he can’t risk by openly diverging.

Notable Quotes:

• "Israel can go on its own. Technically, it did so back last year in the 12 Day War in June. But this war is very much a joint war of two countries against Iran."
  — Anshul Pfeffer (09:45)

• "Donald Trump has his own set of considerations...He wants to be the one to define what victory looks like and it is going to be on his terms."
  — Anshul Pfeffer (10:38)

---

7. Domestic Politics & Public Opinion in Israel

Timestamps: 11:21–12:27

• Israeli public overwhelmingly supports the war due to fears of an existential Iranian threat.
• However, this does not translate to increased support for Netanyahu or his coalition; the war hasn’t shifted entrenched political lines.

Notable Quotes:

• "They're supporting the war, they're not supporting the leader who's taking them to war."
  — Anshul Pfeffer (11:52)

---

8. Current Stalemate and Watchfulness

Timestamps: 12:27–12:51

• Israeli leaders are “anxiously” watching talks to ensure their interests aren’t sacrificed for an expedient American departure and, for now, remain committed to continuing the fight.

• Episode closes with reflection that the outcome depends heavily on whether talks gain substance—otherwise, joint military action continues.

Notable Quotes:

• "Israel's leaders are looking very anxiously at these talks. They want the war to end on their terms, that their terms should be also America's terms, not only Iran's terms."
  — Anshul Pfeffer (12:35)

---

Memorable Moments & Quotes

• Regime Change Rhetoric:
  • "He’s changing the definition of regime change." — Anshul Pfeffer (08:49)
• Israel’s Constraints:
  • "I don't see one of them continuing on its own. Certainly not if it's Donald Trump who calls time because he, I think, will insist that Israel abide by any ceasefire he reaches." — Anshul Pfeffer (09:58)
• Public Sentiment:
  • "They're supporting the war, they're not supporting the leader who's taking them to war." — Anshul Pfeffer (11:52)

---

Takeaway

Episode Summary:
The war against Iran has revealed growing differences between America and Israel. While both began the conflict with regime change aspirations, shifting American priorities—especially Trump’s desire for a swift exit and focus on energy—concern Israeli leaders, who want decisive victory and a weakened regime in Iran. Operational realities make a unilateral Israeli continuation unlikely, binding Israel’s fate closely to American choices, while domestic politics constrain both Trump and Netanyahu.

For listeners:
The episode paints a nuanced picture of alliance politics: strategic goals can shift during conflict, and even close allies like America and Israel may discover critical divergences as wars drag on, with domestic politics, public opinion, and operational interdependence constraining unilateral action.

---

(End of summary)

Transcript

[Rosie Blore]

Scaling requires infrastructure, talent and policy certainty. The UK's modern industrial strategy delivers all three and more through a ten year plan. With ten trillion pounds in capital, world class universities and unrivalled market access, the UK is engineered for growth. Start your investment journey at business.gov.uk.

[Sponsor/Announcer]

This Economist podcast is sponsored by Bill, the intelligent finance platform that helps businesses and accounting firms scale with proven results with AI powered automation. Bill isn't just moving money, they're simplifying financial operations. For nearly half a million customers, Bill has securely processed over a trillion dollars in transactions. That's proven infrastructure. Ready to talk with an expert? Visit bill.comproven and get a $250 gift card as a thank you. That's bill.comproven terms and conditions apply. See Offer page for details.

[Jason Palmer]

The Economist.

[Rosie Blore]

Hello and welcome to the Intelligence from the Economist. I'm Rosie Blore.

[Jason Palmer]

And I'm Jason Palmer. Every weekday we provide a fresh perspective on the events shaping your world.

[Rosie Blore]

I was astonished to find out that Asia accounts for many of the most prolific users of crypto. We dive into who's using it, what for, and how. That's reshaping how people and companies operate.

[Jason Palmer]

And film and TV audiences might feel like they know what Mafia baddies get up to. Real mafiosi like seeing themselves reflected on screen. It wasn't always this way. From Rome to Vegas via Naples, we dive into a new global history of crime families. But first, When it comes to talking up military and diplomatic successes, President Donald Trump unfailingly says that things are going he claims to be in talks with the right people in Iran. He says the country is talking sense that they want to make a deal with him so badly that to top it off, somehow there's a mysterious gift involved.

[John Fasman]

They did something yesterday that was amazing, actually. They gave us a present and the present arrived today.

[Anshul Pfeffer]

And it was a very big present

[John Fasman]

worth a tremendous amount of money.

[Jason Palmer]

Okay, sure. But wind back a tiny bit and listen to this framing.

[Anshul Pfeffer]

We have really regime change. You know, this is a change in

[John Fasman]

the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with.

[Jason Palmer]

That regime change has already happened. Iran's rhetorical habit is to deny that any talks are happening, even if chatter is going on in back channels. A strident Iranian military spokesman has the level of your internal discord reached the point where you are negotiating with yourselves? Do not call your defeat an agreement, he said. The era of your promises is over. What in all this is Israel thinking?

[Anshul Pfeffer]

I think the talks between America and Iran could drag on for a while.

[Jason Palmer]

Anshul Pfeffer is our Israel correspondent.

[Anshul Pfeffer]

But the main concern here in Israel is that Donald Trump will call time on this war without taking Israel's interests into consideration.

[Jason Palmer]

So you presume there, first of all, that those talks really are going on and they may be productive. But you also don't mention the sort of continued military buildup.

[Anshul Pfeffer]

Not just continued military buildup, continued military operations. While we're talking about talks, there is a constant stream of Israeli and American fighter jets bombing various targets in Iran. Trump has ruled out for now, bombing energy related targets. But there are plenty of other places that the Americans and the Israelis are bombing. And as you say, there's also a build up. There's a Marine expeditionary unit en route to the gulf. There's elements of the 82nd Airborne Division arriving in the region as well. So if the talks fail, or perhaps the talks are just a bluff, there's also this new option of some form of ground operations in Iran.

[Jason Palmer]

But you hinted at the start there that Israeli and American goals might not be mutually met when all of this does in one way or another come to a close.

[Anshul Pfeffer]

Well, we saw at the beginning of the war that when Israel and America launched their first airstrikes, there did seem to be a consensus that they're trying to topple or change the Iranian regime. The very first airstrikes were decapitation of the Iranian leadership, including the supreme leader, Ali Khamenei. But over the past three weeks or so, we've seen Donald Trump, I think, drifting more and more to a focus on the energy issue on the Strait of Hormuz, on being able to control the flow of oil out of the region, whereas the Israelis, both in public statements and also what I'm hearing off the record from security officials, are very clear that their aim is to end this war with a much weakened regime, especially weak in the eyes of its own people, in the hope that that would create the conditions for protesters to take to the streets once again, as they did back in December and January, and this time take it all the way to toppling the regime.

[Jason Palmer]

Well, I mean, how much closer to that goal do you think this operation is? How weakened is the regime? How likely is a popular uprising?

[Anshul Pfeffer]

Well, unlike when military targets are hit and you have some kind of quantifiable element of how many missile launchers have been destroyed, how many Iranian warships have been sunk, this is something where you can't measure how weak the regime seems in the eyes of the Iranian people. Now, I know this beyond the Airstrikes, There's a lot of narrative creating operations being carried out. A lot of them are being carried out through Persian language satellite channels, which are Iranian, essentially, but the anti regime. And they're beaming into Iran pictures of besieged militia fleeing drones, of police headquarters in flames, and with a very clear intention of showing to the Iranian people that the oppressors are now on the run. If they decide to take to the streets this time, they can do it. But to measure how much that's working, I think, is impossible even for the best intelligence services in the world.

[Jason Palmer]

But what about the stricter sort of military aims of the mission, the degree to which, in terms of military hardware, the mission is succeeding?

[Anshul Pfeffer]

But one of the main objectives of this war was to destroy Iran's ballistic missile capabilities. And we've seen over the last three weeks what an impact those missiles have had, both here in Israel and in other countries in the region. And even though the numbers seem to indicate a pretty successful operation, that we're hearing, something like 75% of Iran's missile launches have been destroyed and that the assembly lines of the missiles have also been flattened. At the same time, we're seeing every day around 10 to 15 Iranian missiles being launched towards Israel and more being launched towards countries in the Gulf. And this is after over three weeks of constant airstrikes against those missile launchers. So if these talks that Trump is talking about are successful, then it would leave Iran with some of that capability, which is what Israel and other countries in the region are worried about.

[Jason Palmer]

So from either America's or Israel's point of view, this is an unfinished war. But what about that notion that the ultimate goals might be diverging here?

[Anshul Pfeffer]

We're seeing that divergence play out. We're seeing it in the way that Trump is talking about successful talks with Iranians. Now, obviously, that's an exaggeration. The Iranians themselves are denying it. But Trump is basically talking to the regime that he and Netanyahu set out to remove at the beginning of this war. So he's now saying, well, we've done many things to this regime. We've killed so many of its. He's saying that actually that was regime change. So he's changing the definition of regime change. But for those in the region who still will have to confront Iran when this is over, for them, the regime is still here. And even though it's been weakened militarily, in other senses, it's more entrenched.

[Jason Palmer]

But that raises the question that if indeed Mr. Trump is more interested in getting oil moving than finishing the earlier defined job. Is Israel hung out to Dr. Would it continue on alone in any way?

[Anshul Pfeffer]

I don't think Israel has the option of continuing along. First of all, whatever agreement Trump reaches with the Iranians, should he reach an agreement that will almost certainly obligate Israel as well, there won't be half a ceasefire while the other partner in this war continues firing. And these are joint operations. Israeli jets are flying to Tehran. On the way, they're being refueled by American tankers. Israel can go on its own. Technically, it did so back last year in the 12 Day War in June. But this war is very much a joint war of two countries against Iran. And I don't see one of them continuing on its own. Certainly not if it's Donald Trump who calls time because he, I think, will insist that Israel abide by any ceasefire he reaches.

[Jason Palmer]

So Mr. Trump has all of the leverage. There's not an indication from what you've seen that Israel could convince him to carry on, that anyone else in the region could convince him to carry on.

[Anshul Pfeffer]

Benjamin Netanyahu certainly has influence with Donald Trump. We've seen that in the run up to this war. We've seen that over the past years. And there are people around Trump who do think that this war should be continued and agree with Netanyahu. But ultimately, Donald Trump has his own set of considerations, his own optics. He wants to be the one to define what victory looks like and is going to be on his terms. Now, obviously, the Iranians also have what to say about that. But Benjamin Netanyahu can't risk being seen, certainly by the Israeli public where he's now facing re election can't be seen as being at loggerheads with Trump. He thinks one of his most important political assets is the perception that he and Trump are working closely together, and he can't risk that.

[Jason Palmer]

But if part of what Mr. Netanyahu wants to show to Israelis is that he and Mr. Trump are working together, well. But he also wants to show that he's finishing the job and making Israelis more safe by destroying the regime and all that kind of thing. Those things are now in tension.

[Anshul Pfeffer]

Well, there's an intriguing phenomena now in the polling that we've seen in Israel over the last three weeks since the war began, and that is that Israelis are overwhelmingly in favor of this war. They see Iran as an existential risk to Israel, and therefore they support the war. But that doesn't translate into support for Netanyahu, and we haven't seen in the past three weeks, the numbers of Netanyahu's coalition improving in the polls. So they're supporting the war, they're not supporting the leader who's taking them to war. And that may change, obviously, in the coming months before the Israeli election. But it does seem that the lines in Israel between Netanyahu's bloc and the opposition are still very firm, and this war hasn't changed them, at least not yet.

[Jason Palmer]

So in that sense, for the moment, unless something substantial comes out of these alleged talks, it will all continue.

[Anshul Pfeffer]

Israel's leaders are looking very anxiously at these talks. They want the war to end on their terms, that their terms should be also America's terms, not only Iran's terms. And for now, they're prepared to continue fighting.

[Jason Palmer]

Anshul, thanks very much for joining us.

[Anshul Pfeffer]

Thanks for having me, Jason.

[Sponsor/Announcer]

This economist podcast is sponsored by Bill, the intelligent finance platform that helps businesses and accounting firms scale with proven results with AI powered automation. Bill isn't just moving money, they're simplifying financial operations. For nearly half a million customers, Bill has securely processed over a trillion dollars in transactions. That's proven infrastructure. Ready to talk with an expert? Visit bill.comproven and get a $250 gift card as a thank you. That's bill.comproven. terms and conditions apply. See Offer page for details.

[Rosie Blore]

Scaling requires infrastructure, talent and policy certainty. The UK's modern industrial strategy delivers all three and more through a ten year plan. With ten trillion pounds in capital, world class universities, and unrivalled market access, the UK is engineered for growth. Start your investment journey at business.gov.uk growth.

[Su Lin Wong]

So today I'm going to be showing

[Sponsor/Announcer]

you the one simple trick that truly

[Su Lin Wong]

let me build wealth in crypto.

[Sponsor/Announcer]

It's the reason why I got rich in this industry.

[John Fasman]

And this is the richest guy in the world from crypto.

[Sponsor/Announcer]

I assure you this is going to be one of the most important videos

[John Fasman]

that you'll ever watch, because this here

[Sponsor/Announcer]

is going to be the one.

[Rosie Blore]

The Internet is awash with advice on how ordinary people can turn crypto into profit. Scroll through social media and it sometimes seems like everyone is trading and investing, but in Asia, the numbers are truly staggering and the region's dominance is changing how crypto may be used in the future.

[Su Lin Wong]

So there's a perception in the developed world that crypto is this wildly speculative plaything, but in the developing world it's actually perceived quite differently. And Asia is a great case study of why.

[Rosie Blore]

Su Lin Wong is host of our podcast series Scam Inc. And an Asia

[Su Lin Wong]

correspondent So for many ordinary people across the region, their smartphones have now become their bank branches and crypto is being used to solve real world problems, whether that's sending money home to paying freelancers and reimbursing suppliers. And so all of this suggests that Asia is leading crypto shift from being just a financial curiosity and speculative thing to an actually useful everyday tool.

[Rosie Blore]

Su Lin, we know that crypto is used everywhere now. So how important is Asia's role in it?

[Su Lin Wong]

Asia is very important. If you take India for example, it was ranked first for the third consecutive year on a global cryptocurrency adoption index that is run by Chainalysis, a data firm. And it saw an estimated $338 billion in crypto flows between mid 2024 and mid 2025. And so when incomes are adjusted for local price differences, India's crypto activity relative to GDP per person far exceeds that of richer countries. And actually, if you delve into this index, nine of the top 20 countries on it are Asian, including Pakistan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, Banglade, Korea, Thailand and Japan.

[Rosie Blore]

And why is that? Why have people in Asia been such prolific adopters of crypto?

[Su Lin Wong]

So a really big part of this story is remittances. And remittances traditionally are very expensive to send home. Around 24 million people from Southeast Asia work abroad. So think of, for example, a Filipino nurse who's working here in Singapore, where I'm based, and she wants to send money home to Manila. If she sent US$500 through a traditional bank transfer, that might cost her 20 to $30. But if she uses crypto instead, it might only cost her five to ten dollars. And the key thing to understand here is that she's probably not using Bitcoin, the most famous cryptocurrency. But what she's probably using instead are stablecoins. And these are digital tokens that are generally pegged to the US dollar. Unlike Bitcoin, their price barely ever fluctuates. And the most comm circulation are tether or USDT and circle usdc. And so these are really becoming the backbone of crypto activity.

[Rosie Blore]

Remittances mainly applies to migrant workers. Are others using crypto too?

[Su Lin Wong]

Yes. So actually what I have noticed in my reporting is that lots of people who live in countries where the banking system isn't very good, or the local currency is really volatile, or inflation is rampant, they're turning to stablecoins. Then there are other use cases. So for example, businesses are using them for cross border payments. A Vietnamese firm paying A Thai supplier would typically need to use correspondent banks for currency conversion. But stablecoin payments will often settle faster with fewer intermediaries. And so we're seeing more and more transactions between businesses happening in stablecoins. And then another use case I came across were freelancers who, who might rely on them to get paid more quickly. So according to the World Bank, Asia has more than 210 million gig economy workers, which would be roughly half of the global total. And many in Southeast Asia would work on online platforms like Grab and Gojek, which are kind of super apps like Uber and DoorDash. And traditional payment systems will often delay payouts to drivers and delivery workers. But stablecoins enable instant settlement.

[Rosie Blore]

Su Lin, you know a lot about crypto from your podcast series scamming. How risky is this?

[Su Lin Wong]

I do think there's a bit of a perception that some of the ways that stablecoins are being used are quite dodgy. And so it's the same features that appeal to, say, a Filipino nurse who wants to send money home using stablecoins. So the speed, the low fees, the fact she doesn't need a bank account. Those features also appeal to criminal syndicates operating in Myanmar and Cambodia and conducting large scale fraud operations. So whether stablecoins fulfill their promise will depend largely on what happens here in Asia. And the region really has the scale, the need, the regulatory ambition to resolve this tension between legitimate use cases in the real world for stablecoins and the fact that the same networks are being used by criminals to launder money. The big question is now whether they will become financial infrastructure or tools for fraud. So if the experiment succeeds, stablecoins could really reshape global finance and show that crypto technology can solve real problems for millions of people. But if they fail, I think crypto will remain what sceptics have long claimed, a speculative asset in search of a legitimate use case.

[Rosie Blore]

Su Lin, thank you very much.

[Su Lin Wong]

Thanks so much, Rosie.

[John Fasman]

Only a fool would associate or go into business with Tommy Shelby.

[Jason Palmer]

John Fasman is a senior culture correspondent for the Economist.

[John Fasman]

He is a gangster, he's a murderer, he's a big fan of opium, but he is also eminently watchable, thanks to Cillian Murphy and his captivating dead eyed betrayal. Tommy, as you probably know, is the dark heart of Peaky Blinders, which was a terrific series that ran for six years on BBC. And there's a new film, Peaky the Immortal man, now out on Netflix. Shelby is a riveting antihero, which he has in common with other prominent Mafiosi think of Al Pacino as Michael Corleone or James Gandolfini's terrific performance as Tony Soprano in the Sopranos. All this from a slice of gabagool. There's a new book out by Ryan Gingeris called A Global History that explains how actual gangsters talk, act and see themselves, and how they may be influenced by what they've seen on screen. The real life versions obviously don't have screenwriters, so they're a lot less charming and eloquent. But like fictional mafiosi, they reveal a great deal about the societies in which they operate. Professor Gingeris argues that mafiosis have helped define the making of the modern world, and I think that's true. He takes readers from classical Rome to modern Las Vegas. Across all these times and places, there are similarities that emerge among different mafia groups, such as clannishness, a ruthless enforcement of rules and devotion to arcane initiation rituals. The word mafia started being used in the early 1800s, but really they have a rich pre history. For centuries before that. There were bands of brigands and bandits, and these were simple thieves who preyed on travelers when they got outside the reach of the state. There were some brigands who controlled small armies. I'm thinking here of a delightfully named thug, Bulaphilix, who terrorized 3rd century Rome. But as he discovered, going brawn for brawn against even a moderately functional state is usually a losing proposition. There were a few lucky bandits who got co opted by young states that needed the muscle. But as states grew richer, they developed police forces that extended their authority and helped wipe out these roving bandit groups. What's true about mafias is they generally tended to emerge in places where the government's influence didn't fully reach. I'm thinking here of southern Italy, where the Camorra thrived in Naples and the Mafia in Sicily. Japan's Yakuza drew members from the low ranks of society and gave them a job and a sense of purpose. Some of these gangs started out as simple kidnappers and extortionists. But really it was prohibition of alcohol in 20th century America, of opium in China, of gambling in Japan, for instance, that created modern mafias. Prohibition in America also created the first globally famous mafioso. It's a guy who you've heard of named Al Capone, who spied an opportunity in Chicago in the 1920s and founded the feared Chicago outfit. In America, the Mafia's power started to wane in the late 20th century. Congress passed something called the racketeer influenced in corrupt Organizations act in 1970, known better as RICO, and this let prosecutors charge crime family heads for underling's misdeeds as long as they could prove that these misdeeds were part of a continuing criminal enterprise. The other thing that happened is that bosses got used to seeing versions of themselves on screen and they came to love the limelight as opposed to their predecessors who tended to operate in the shadows. John Gotti, who was the flashy head of the Gambino crime family in the 1980s, Mafiosis loved seeing himself in the paper. One old timer complained to him, it took 100 years to put this together and you're ruining it in six months. And even if the Mafia is not what it was in America, Mafiosis hold over popular culture remains entrenched. In Turkey, people started calling gangsters Baba, which means Godfather, after seeing Francis Ford Coppola's films. Recruits to one Mexican cartel are still required to watch the trilogy as a necessary tutorial in the meaning of family and values. And the sites of violent showdowns have become tourist destinations. In Las Vegas, which was partly built with Mob money, visitors can now go to the Mob Museum, which features a bullet riddled wall against which seven of Capone's rivals were machine gunned to death in 1929. The Mob Museum even offers discounted admission to law enforcement, which is an offer surely they can't refuse.

[Jason Palmer]

That's all for this episode of the Intelligence we'll see you back here tomorrow.

[Sponsor/Announcer]

This Economist podcast is sponsored by Bill, the intelligent finance platform that helps businesses and accounting firms scale with proven results with AI powered automation. Bill isn't just moving money, they're simplifying financial operations. For nearly half a million customers, Bill has securely processed over a trillion dollars in transactions. That's proven infrastructure. Ready to talk with an expert? Visit bill.com proven and get a $250 gift card as a thank you. That's bill.com/proven. Terms and conditions apply. See Offer page for details.

[Boost Mobile Advertiser]

Unlock the savings at Boost Mobile and save up to $600 a year I've been scouting these big carriers for a minute now, and I've seen them pull the same play a thousand times. They promise you the world, then hit you with a price hike right when the game gets tight. But boost mobile, their $25 a month unlimited wireless plan, is the most consistent player on the floor. No contracts, no price hikes. Unlock the Savings today at boostmobile. Com Unlock based on average annual single line payment of AT&T Verizon and T Mobile customers compared to 12 months of the Boost Mobile Unlimited Wireless Plan as of January2026. For full offer details, visit boostmobile. Com.