Loading summary
A
Hi, I'm John Prideaux, the US Editor of the Economist, and I also host our podcast Checks and Balance. Each week I'm joined by our New York bureau chief, Charlotte Howard, and our Washington bureau chief, James Bennett. We take one issue in American politics and explore it in depth. We try to understand the why behind the news.
B
Americans have a BSO meter that Democrats haven't really passed, or at least the people who've been leading the party haven't passed.
A
We look at the data and the trends to put the current moment in context.
C
There is no more potentially dangerous power that any president has than the one that Donald Trump is now exerting so freely, and
A
we're not afraid to offer some unconventional
D
perspectives. I think the problem with the court partly is that it should be more political than it is not more partisan, but more political.
A
So join me and my expert colleagues in the US and around the world as we discuss the great experiment that is American democracy. Checks and Balance from the Economist is available to subscribers. For the best offer, follow the link in the show notes or search for Economist podcasts plus.
Podcast: Economist Podcasts
Episode: Trailer: Checks and Balance
Date: May 6, 2026
Host: John Prideaux (US Editor, The Economist)
Guests: Charlotte Howard (New York Bureau Chief), James Bennett (Washington Bureau Chief), Additional Contributor
This trailer introduces the "Checks and Balance" podcast by The Economist, an in-depth weekly series examining key issues in American politics. Hosted by John Prideaux and joined by prominent correspondents, the show promises deep dives into the “why” behind the headlines, blending data, expert perspectives, and robust debate to make sense of America’s complex democracy.
Single-Issue Deep Dives: Each week, the podcast tackles one significant issue in American politics, providing thorough analysis and context.
Emphasis on Data and Trends: The team uses data-driven analysis to contextualize contemporary developments.
The show assembles correspondents with varying expertise, encouraging bold, sometimes unconventional viewpoints on national affairs.
Hosts are unafraid to challenge party lines or prevailing narratives.
Public Perception: The team explores why some political leaders struggle with public credibility.
Executive Authority: The serious impact of presidential powers is underscored, referencing Donald Trump as a contemporary example.
“Americans have a BSO meter that Democrats haven't really passed, or at least the people who've been leading the party haven't passed.”
— Charlotte Howard [00:21]
“There is no more potentially dangerous power that any president has than the one that Donald Trump is now exerting so freely…”
— James Bennett [00:33]
“I think the problem with the court partly is that it should be more political than it is—not more partisan, but more political.”
— Contributor D [00:47]
“So join me and my expert colleagues … as we discuss the great experiment that is American democracy.”
— John Prideaux [00:55]
The episode is both analytical and conversational, reflecting The Economist’s reputation for insightful journalism blended with engaging banter. The hosts exhibit a willingness to question conventions and to present nuanced, sometimes contrarian takes on current affairs.
Conclusion:
"Checks and Balance" seeks to demystify American politics through rigorous, thought-provoking discussion, making it essential listening for those wanting more than headlines—whether in the US or abroad.