Excess Returns Podcast
Episode Title: World War AI | Ben Hunt on the Economic Consequences of the AI Boom
Published: November 28, 2025
Host: Matt Zeigler (Excess Returns)
Guest: Ben Hunt (Epsilon Theory)
Main Theme & Purpose
This episode dives into the powerful and rapidly shifting narratives around artificial intelligence (AI), with a particular focus on how U.S. government and corporate investment in AI is being framed as an existential, World War II-scale national security project. Ben Hunt breaks down the underlying economic, political, and market consequences of this framing, drawing on his recent essay, "World War AI." He explores the risks of massive capital and energy reallocations, their impact on society, jobs, and inflation, and lays out alternative policies to balance progress with prosperity for all.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Narrative Shift: From Promise to National Security Imperative
- Observation: The rhetoric around AI has shifted sharply in the past year—from "carrot" stories about productivity and prosperity to "stick" narratives invoking a cold war-style race against China.
- "The thesis of the note is that our government...will increasingly present AI CapEx, AI development as a national security, arms race, war footing, in competition with China as a mortal enemy. Very similar to the mobilization of the economy around World War II." (Ben Hunt, 06:30)
- Consequence: This narrative change justifies unprecedented resource allocation and sacrifices by invoking historical examples like the Manhattan Project and WWII mobilization.
2. The Limits and Fallout of the “Carrot” Narrative
- Carrot Narrative Recap: For years, the public was sold AI as a path to abundance—less work, more wealth, greater leisure. Hunt argues this never materialized for most people.
- "We were presented with a carrot, not a stick. We were presented with a carrot of a golden age of productivity and leisure and wealth will be ours if only we make this sort of enormous effort and investment in AI. The carrot...was never going to be successful in the long term because it just ain't true. I mean, we're all working harder today, not less." (Ben Hunt, 08:33)
- Inequality: The supposed prosperity accrues to 'techno-oligarchs' rather than society at large.
3. World War II-Scale Capital & Energy Reallocation
- Data Center Buildout as Mobilization: Hunt documents that projected U.S. AI infrastructure investment (>$4 trillion over four years) rivals all WWII spending (in current dollars).
- "The punchline is...the numbers are roughly the numbers that we spent on World War II. I mean, in truly insane numbers in terms of money—something north of $4 trillion over the next four years...That money's got to come from somewhere...all that money today going towards AI data center build out, that's investment that does not go to anything else. In particular, it doesn't go to the consumer economy." (Ben Hunt, 13:29)
- Economic Implications:
- Money and physical resources (especially electricity) are being diverted from the wider economy, crowding out consumer services and driving up costs (e.g., health insurance, housing, energy).
- "We're already seeing that happening where consumer credit, capital intensive consumer services like health insurance, homeowners insurance—all these things are going up in price because there's not as much capital being invested in them." (Ben Hunt, 13:29)
- Debt to GDP: The US is already at WWII-level debt-to-GDP before new AI spending begins, compounding risk.
- "We're starting there, we're starting there with the U.S. government today. Now that's for U.S. government spending. That's not counting the private spending and investment." (Ben Hunt, 13:29)
4. Energy: Scarcity and Rationing Risks
- AI as Energy Black Hole: AI’s electrical demand could consume 22–25% of U.S. energy by 2030, creating price and availability pressures for everyone else.
- "If you are reallocating...electricity and energy to these AI data centers—which we are—it creates shortages of energy everywhere else...that leads to today being rationed through price—so our utility bills go up. Tomorrow, it goes towards rationing by just—you don't have it available." (Ben Hunt, 22:55)
- Potential path: price controls, political backlash, and even physical ration books (as in WWII).
5. Employment and the “Jobless Boom”
- No New Jobs: Unlike WWII, when mobilization created millions of jobs, the AI boom is explicitly designed to reduce labor.
- "In fact, the avowed purpose of AI data centers is to reduce jobs...You're getting operational efficiencies...There are no new jobs here. There are no net new jobs for sure." (Ben Hunt, 28:25)
- Social Impact: AI’s disruption will most heavily affect junior/entry-level workers first, with plans to expand into blue-collar roles via robotics in the future.
- "This is the old saying about how many people do you have to employ for a data center? I mean, it's one guy and a dog to...make sure nobody's breaking in. That's it. These things don't require—create—new jobs...the goal is to replace the physical manipulation, the blue-collar jobs tomorrow." (Ben Hunt, 28:25)
6. Crowding-Out and Dynamics of Boom-Bust
- Market Myopia: Individually, every AI data center project 'pencils out.' In aggregate, the resource drain is unsustainable, setting up for a classic boom–bust scenario.
- "All 500 of these deals don't work in the aggregate...This is market myopia...and it is what generates boom situations...then you have a terrible, terrible bust." (Ben Hunt, 53:32)
- Political Risk: The only solution is to rein in AI's share via policy intervention before the bust.
7. Policy Alternatives & Hopeful Approaches
Ben proposes three policies to realign progress with broad prosperity:
- Rapid reshoring of manufacturing: Create new jobs by bringing industry back to the U.S.
- "I am all for requiring Apple...to bring back manufacturing jobs to the United States." (Ben Hunt, 44:16)
- Build out all forms of energy generation: Support economic abundance by massively increasing energy supply via every means—nuclear, solar, wind, gas, coal.
- "We need nuclear. Of course we need nuclear...Yes, we need wind and solar...we need it all. Am I worried about carbon emissions? Of course...but I am more worried about this Blade Runner future that we're creating..." (Ben Hunt, 44:16)
- Hard 10% electricity cap for data centers: Prevent AI from consuming all new electrical generation—ensure other sectors and the public benefit.
- "Put a cap on how much electricity can be consumed by data centers. My proposal is a 10% cap." (Ben Hunt, 44:16)
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
- "Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining. They're pissing on our back and telling us, oh, it's just a gentle spring rain. The carrot doesn't work." — Ben Hunt (10:05)
- "When you reallocate trillions of dollars, whether it's for a COVID response or an AI data center build out, without having enormous repercussions in the rest of the economy...we focus so much on the problem we're trying to solve that we ignore the unintended consequences." — Ben Hunt (20:00)
- "This is a different kind of technology. It is designed to be a replacement for human labor. That's the whole point. The only jobs that remain...are the meat taking care of the meat...health care, elder care, nursing." — Ben Hunt (34:17)
- "If people vote and say, 'this ain’t working for me, I am having shortages, my utility bill goes up...so I can have an AI friend? Are you freaking kidding me?' ... that's when we'll have a moment...either AI authoritarian moment or an AI backlash...Both of those outcomes to me are really poor." — Ben Hunt (41:04)
- "People don't know it's an option. And it has to be an option and we have to start talking about it." — Ben Hunt (64:32)
- "It's important to be for things...be for energy expansion, be for jobs coming from industrial and manufacturing reshoring...bring positive energy to this." — Ben Hunt (59:57)
Important Timestamps
| Timestamp | Segment/Event | |-----------|--------------| | 06:30 | Ben outlines the “World War AI” thesis—AI as national security, WW2-scale mobilization. | | 08:33 | The false promises of the AI “carrot” narrative. | | 13:29 | Comparison of WWII and current AI-capital investment/crowding out. | | 22:55 | Energy reallocations, price pressures, and risk of rationing. | | 28:25 | Labor market implications—AI's true job impact vs. WWII. | | 34:17 | Why the expected “new jobs” effect from tech may not materialize with AI. | | 44:16 | Ben’s three core policy proposals for a balanced future. | | 53:32 | Market myopia and the oncoming boom-bust dynamic in AI data center buildout. | | 64:32 | The idea that capping data center energy usage is an option, and states are awakening to it. |
Tone & Language
- Candid, urgent, and policy-driven; Ben Hunt balances skeptical critique of elite techno-optimism with a practical, hopeful call for collective action.
- Deploys vivid metaphors ("carrot vs. stick," "pissing down my back," "boom-bust," "meat taking care of the meat") to elucidate potentially abstract concepts.
Actionable Summary for Listeners
- The AI boom is being rebranded as a “war effort” to justify massive, concentrated resource allocation, with real risks of economic crowding out, inflation, inequality, energy shortages, and job loss.
- Hope exists: meaningful policies can ensure the benefits of technology are broadly shared—reshore jobs, build more energy, and cap AI’s energy share.
- Before it’s too late and political extremism takes over, Ben advocates for proactive, positive, and inclusive policy engagement.
To Dive Deeper:
- Read Ben Hunt’s original essay, “World War AI”
- Explore the narrative-tracking platforms: Epsilon Theory (for all investors), Panoptica (general audience), and Perseant Pro (institutional investors)
- Stay engaged at Epsilon Theory’s website for updates and resources
Episode recommended for investors, policymakers, and anyone interested in the intersection of technology, economics, and society as AI reshapes the world.
