Podcast
Film Making Giants
Hosted by Niklas Osterman · EN
Step into the worlds of the filmmakers who reshaped cinema forever. Filmmaking Giants tells the stories of visionaries who transformed moving pictures into the most powerful art form of the modern age. From D. W. Griffith’s groundbreaking continuity editing to Sergei Eisenstein’s explosive montage, from F. W. Murnau’s haunting shadows to Jean Renoir’s humanist eye, from Orson Welles’s innovations in sound and space to Alfred Hitchcock’s mastery of suspense—this season brings you ten giants whose influence still shapes every frame we see.
We travel further: Akira Kurosawa’s rain-soaked epics, Yasujirō Ozu’s quiet tatami-level stillness, Satyajit Ray’s realism rooted in everyday life, and Ingmar Bergman’s intimate explorations of faith and existence. Each episode blends biography, context, and legacy—asking how these filmmakers changed the language of cinema and why their work still matters today.
Season 1 is a guided tour through the foundation of world cinema. Whether you’re a student of film, a working creator, or simply someone who loves stories told on screen, this series gives you the tools to see movies differently—and to recognize the giants whose shoulders we all stand on.
Produced by Selenius Media Inc
10episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
Lynne Ramsay — Visual minimalism & sound-driven storytelling
Feb 2700:10:27Tap to summarizeYou’re listening to Filmmaking Giants. Today’s filmmaker works at the opposite end of cinema from explanation. Lynne Ramsay does not tell you what to think, and she does not walk you through what happens. She places you inside a state. Inside a sensation. Inside a wound. Her films are built from fragments—images, sounds, gestures, memories that surface without warning—and together they form something closer to lived experience than to narrative design. Ramsay is a director of pure sensory cinema, where meaning arrives through feeling first and language only later, if at all.
Transcribe →
Denis Villeneuve — The new master of scale
Feb 2200:11:46Tap to summarizeYou’re listening to Filmmaking Giants. Today’s episode is about a director who makes vastness feel intimate. Denis Villeneuve is often described as a master of scale—of deserts, cities, spaceships, war rooms, fog, glass towers, and silent horizons—but what makes him rare is that his scale isn’t just size. It’s emotional architecture. He builds environments that feel like systems: controlled, cold, immense. And then, inside those systems, he places a human being—often quiet, often burdened, often morally compromised—and he asks what survives.
Transcribe →
Alfonso Cuarón — The fluid camera
Feb 1700:11:16Tap to summarizeYou’re listening to Filmmaking Giants. Today’s episode is about a director who changed what camera movement means. Plenty of filmmakers move the camera. Some move it to show off. Some move it because the budget allows it. Some move it because movement is exciting and cinema, after all, is motion. But Alfonso Cuarón’s camera doesn’t move simply to impress. It moves to place you inside a human situation—physically, emotionally, morally. It moves like attention moves. It moves like fear moves. It moves like memory moves. And by doing that, Cuarón became one of the defining filmmakers of modern cinema: a director whose technical mastery is never separate from his empathy.
Transcribe →
Park Chan-wook — Operatic violence & surreal beauty
Feb 1200:11:20Tap to summarizeYou’re listening to Filmmaking Giants. Today’s episode is about a director who makes violence look like opera—stylized, rhythmic, sometimes darkly funny, sometimes horrifically intimate—and then uses that beauty to trap you. Park Chan-wook is famous for extreme images: a hallway fight, a hammer, a tongue, an octopus, a revenge that turns into a labyrinth. But if you reduce him to shock, you miss the real craft. Park’s films are not violent because he likes violence. They are violent because he is fascinated by what violence reveals—about desire, shame, power, identity, and the hidden stories people tell themselves so they can keep living.Park is also one of cinema’s great formalists. His framing is precise. His color is purposeful. His camera movement is deliberate. His editing has the snap of a blade. He understands that style is not a surface; style is a weapon. He uses it to seduce the viewer into complicity, and then he makes you confront what you enjoyed.
Transcribe →
Béla Tarr — The collapse of time
Feb 700:08:19Tap to summarizeYou’re listening to Filmmaking Giants. Today’s filmmaker does not ask for your attention. He demands your time. Béla Tarr is a director who understood something most cinema spends its energy denying: that time itself is the central experience of life, and that when hope collapses, time does not speed up or dramatize itself. It slows down. It drags. It repeats. It weighs on the body. Tarr’s cinema is built from that weight.
Transcribe →
Wong Kar-wai — The poet of longing
Feb 500:13:40Tap to summarizeYou’re listening to Filmmaking Giants. Today we’re stepping into the work of a director who doesn’t just tell stories about love and memory—he builds films that feel like remembering. Wong Kar-wai is often described as the poet of longing, but that phrase can sound like a compliment you put on a poster. What it really means is that his cinema doesn’t behave like normal narrative cinema. It behaves like desire: it repeats, it delays, it circles, it fixates on details, it turns time elastic, it makes the ordinary feel sacred, and it leaves you with the ache of something that was almost possible.
Transcribe →
Paul Thomas Anderson — American mythographer
Feb 200:09:43Tap to summarizeYou’re listening to Filmmaking Giants. Today’s filmmaker works at the center of American cinema while constantly pushing against its edges. Paul Thomas Anderson is a director obsessed with power, obsession, intimacy, and the invisible forces that pull people into orbit around one another. His films are not plot machines. They are gravitational fields. Characters don’t simply interact—they collide, repel, dominate, submit, and slowly reveal who they are when pressure is applied.
Transcribe →
Claire Denis — Intimacy, bodies, and colonial history
Jan 3100:23:49Tap to summarizeYou’re listening to Filmmaking Giants. This is a show about the people who changed the language of cinema—not only by inventing new techniques, but by changing what films feel like from the inside. And today’s filmmaker is not someone who shouts her importance. She doesn’t build her reputation on speeches, on plot mechanics, on tidy moral statements, or on stories that close like a locked door at the end. Instead, she makes films that remain open in the body. Films you don’t just remember—you carry. Claire Denis is one of the rare directors whose work teaches you that cinema isn’t only what you see. It’s what you sense. It’s the pressure of a room. It’s the heat of skin. It’s the space between two people who can’t say what matters, so they express it with distance, with touch, with refusal.Niklas Osterman
Transcribe →
Andrei Konchalovsky — The other titan of Russian cinema
Jan 3000:10:45Tap to summarizeYou’re listening to Filmmaking Giants. Today’s story is about a director whose name often appears in parentheses—someone people mention only to explain that he is not Tarkovsky, not Eisenstein, not the symbol they already recognize when they think of “Russian cinema.” But that parenthetical treatment hides something essential. Andrei Konchalovsky is not a footnote. He is one of the most unusual career arcs in modern film: a director who moved between Soviet-era prestige cinema and Western commercial filmmaking, between intimate moral drama and large-scale historical spectacle, between arthouse seriousness and Hollywood genre machinery—without ever fully becoming either a dissident saint or a studio craftsman.Niklas Osterman
Transcribe →
David Lynch — Dreams, dread, and the subconscious
Jan 3000:28:58Tap to summarizeYou’re listening to Filmmaking Giants. This is a show about craft, but not craft as a checklist. Craft as a way of seeing. And today’s figure is one of the rare directors who didn’t just develop a style—he taught audiences to accept a different kind of reality. Not the reality of facts, not the reality of realism, but the reality of feeling: the way dread arrives before the reason, the way desire pulls you into a room you know you shouldn’t enter, the way a sound in the dark can change the meaning of a face.David Lynch is often described with the easiest word available—surreal—but that word is too small for what he does. Surrealism can be decorative. It can be playful. It can be a museum of oddness. Lynch’s work is not primarily odd. It is intimate. It’s emotional. It is rooted in the way a normal day can suddenly split open and reveal something underneath that was always there, humming, waiting. He doesn’t make “weird” films. He makes films about the moment the familiar becomes unbearable.Niklas Osterman
Transcribe →