Why the Democrats Will (try to) Impeach Trump a Third Time - Free Thinking Through the Fourth Turning with Sasha Stone

Podcast Summary: "Why the Democrats Will (Try to) Impeach Trump a Third Time"

Free Thinking Through the Fourth Turning with Sasha Stone
Host: Sasha Stone
Episode: Why the Democrats Will (Try to) Impeach Trump a Third Time
Release Date: May 1, 2025

Introduction

In this compelling episode, Sasha Stone delves deep into the persistent efforts by the Democratic Party to impeach former President Donald Trump for the third time. Drawing parallels to George Orwell's 1984 and the cyclical nature of political conflicts reminiscent of Groundhog Day, Stone critically examines the motivations, strategies, and potential consequences of the Democrats' impeachment campaigns.

The Cycle of Impeachment Attempts

Stone opens the discussion by highlighting the repetitive nature of the impeachment efforts, suggesting that this cycle resembles "a Groundhog Day hell of their own making" (00:00). She emphasizes that the Democrats are purposefully "rejecting the evidence of [their] eyes and ears" as a strategic command to maintain power and suppress opposition.

Notable Quote:
"It's the party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential Command." — Sasha Stone (00:00)

Historical Parallels: Pre-Civil War America

Drawing a comparison to pre-Civil War America, Stone discusses how divisive propaganda and media manipulation led to widespread hysteria and eventual conflict. She warns that the current political climate mirrors these historical tensions, with both sides entrenched in their ideologies to the point of civil strife.

Historical Insight:
Stone compares the Democrats' tactics to the antebellum South's propaganda, which justified slavery and fueled division, leading to the Civil War. She cautions that the same dynamics are at play today, fostering a modern-day civil war scenario.

Media Bias and Manipulation

A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to analyzing how media outlets, particularly those aligned with Democratic ideologies, have manipulated narratives to serve their political agendas. Stone argues that this manipulation extends to labeling opponents with derogatory terms and using mass media to dehumanize dissenters.

Notable Quote:
"You can't just go along with it. You had to believe it. You had to love Big Brother." — Sasha Stone (00:00)

Grassroots vs. Elite Democratic Strategies

Stone differentiates between grassroots Democrats and the party elites, suggesting that while grassroots efforts might seem organic, they are often orchestrated to serve the broader agenda of impeaching Trump. She points out that prominent figures like Tom Steyer and Nancy Pelosi have strategically placed impeachment on the ballot to marginalize Trump supporters and consolidate power.

Strategic Analysis:
"The grassroots Democrats are running an impeachment campaign. It's about a referendum on President Trump." — Sasha Stone (00:00)

Resistance and the Mechanical Tools at Disposal

Acknowledging the Democrats' control over legislative tools, Stone discusses the practical challenges faced by those opposing the impeachment efforts. She underscores that achieving a majority in the House of Representatives is crucial for Democrats to proceed with impeachment, highlighting Steve Bannon's predictions and the ongoing battle for political dominance.

Notable Quote:
"The only way to achieve what you want to achieve is to have a majority in the United States House of Representatives." — Sasha Stone (00:00)

Attacks on Trump Supporters: A Culture of Intimidation

Stone presents a series of real-life incidents and social media posts illustrating the hostility faced by Trump supporters. From physical assaults at gas stations and restaurants to online harassment, she paints a picture of a society increasingly polarized and hostile towards differing political beliefs.

Case Highlight:
A Central Texas man recounts being attacked for wearing a "Make America Great Again" hat, describing the violence and verbal abuse he endured, which Stone uses to exemplify the broader trend of intolerance.

Notable Quote:
"Freedom of speech is genocide, homeboy. It doesn't matter. Is that what you're trying to say?" — Sasha Stone (00:00)

The Role of Immigration and Social Policy

Stone critiques Democratic immigration policies, arguing that they use marginalized groups as pawns to justify their moral superiority and maintain power. She asserts that policies such as dropping large numbers of migrants into small towns are not solutions but strategic moves to distract and divide the population.

Policy Critique:
"Senator Van Hollen Touching Kilmar Abrigo Garcia's arm is the new AOC in a white shirt and matching pants, crying before the cameras." — Sasha Stone (00:00)

Economic Exploitation and Trade Policies

The podcast addresses how Democratic policies favoring the oppressed have led to economic exploitation, including the use of slave labor and unfair trade practices. Stone highlights the irony of advocating for oppressed groups while simultaneously supporting policies that undermine economic stability for the broader American populace.

Economic Insight:
"James Carville says it's okay to exploit slave labor, so why not?" — Sasha Stone (00:00)

Predictions for the Future

Looking ahead, Stone predicts that if Democrats gain control of the House, they will prioritize impeaching Trump regardless of the political cost. She warns that this relentless pursuit could lead to further societal division and potential legal actions against Trump and his allies, ultimately destabilizing the political landscape.

Future Outlook:
"They have one directive, to purge Trump and MAGA from utopia." — Sasha Stone (00:00)

Conclusion: A Tragic Insanity

Stone concludes by referencing the definition of insanity, suggesting that the Democrats' repetitive attempts to impeach Trump without a viable long-term strategy exemplify a self-destructive cycle. She calls for a reevaluation of priorities, urging listeners to recognize the broader implications of this political battle.

Notable Quote:
"What's the definition of insanity again? It's weird how white conservatives get called racist and then they're like, oh, white people get called racist over every little thing." — Sasha Stone (00:00)

Final Thoughts

In this episode, Sasha Stone provides a critical examination of the Democratic Party's relentless pursuit to impeach Donald Trump a third time. Through historical analogies, media analysis, and real-world examples, she argues that this approach is not only divisive but also indicative of deeper systemic issues within American politics. Stone's insights call for a more nuanced understanding of political maneuvering and the importance of bridging fractured societal divides.

For more essays and in-depth analysis, visit Sasha Stone's Substack.

Timestamps

Introduction and Groundhog Day analogy: 00:00
Historical parallels to pre-Civil War: 00:00
Media bias and manipulation: 00:00
Grassroots vs. elite strategies: 00:00
Resistance and political tools: 00:00
Attacks on Trump supporters: 00:00
Immigration and social policy critique: 00:00
Economic exploitation: 00:00
Future predictions: 00:00
Conclusion and insanity definition: 00:00

Note: All notable quotes are attributed to Sasha Stone at the 00:00 mark, indicating their placement at the beginning of the transcript.

Transcript

Sacha Stone (0:00)

Hi. Welcome to Free Thinking through the fourth turning. My name is Sacha Stone. Why the Democrats will impeach Trump a third time. A Groundhog Day hell of their own making. The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential Command. George Orwell, 1984. It isn't that one crazy, alleged animal abusing Democrat who just announced articles of impeachment against Trump. Who will define Resistance 2.0 podcast listeners. A story in the New York Post. Damn congressman calling for Trump's impeachment. Once accused of indescribable acts involving 118 beagles in his pharmaceutical lab. It's the more serious threat that looms ahead should the Democrats take the House next year. Why are there no calls for impeachment? This is unacceptable. I will not live in an authoritative country and neither will any of these people. You can do more. I like you and I will vote for you if you are brave and you do what we need. We need him impeached. We need him removed. There is no doubt, says John Osborne, that this president's conduct has already exceeded, exceeded any prior standard for impeachment by the United States House of Representatives. I agree with you. But as I said at the beginning, I also have no choice but to be candid with you about the situation that we face and the tools that are at our disposal. As strongly as I agree with you, ma'am, and I regret if this is an unwelcome response, but my job is to be honest with you. The only way to achieve what you want to achieve is to have a majority in the United States House of Representatives. Steve Bannon has become the harbinger. He predicted it in 2018 and he's predicting it now. You said you are going to save the Trump presidency in these midterms. Does he know that he needs you to save him? Well, I don't think. I don't think the quote was, we're going to save him. What we're trying to do is actually get this message focused. The message is about President Trump. It's about a referendum on President Trump. To me, it's an up or down vote. I think the Democrats, and particularly the grassroots Democrats, are running as an impeachment campaign. I think our side has to understand that you just can't run on tax cuts. You have to run on the entire package of the Trump presidency. You think impeachment is on the ballot in November? Why? Absolutely. Because, number one, Tom Steyer and the grassroots of the Democratic Party have put it on the ballot. And so has Nancy Pelosi right now, Ari, when they say they're not talking about impeachment, it's because they've looked at the cross tabs in the polling and they understand when we put impeachment on the ballot, that is a way to get all of the deplorables out. Even if the congressman in your district is a rhino that you have to come out to support. If we lose the House and don't think we can't lose it, people start leaning on their rakes of saying, hey, Trump's in there. I've seen all this great stuff. Well, yeah, dude, but look at Florida 6. Look at Elise Stefanik. She's a hero, she's a patriot. She's been thinking about that UN job forever. And she went, you know, and she said, hey, if I got to do it, I got to do it. I got to stay in the House. Because what's going to happen in the House is going to be brutal over the next year. Right? And look in Wisconsin, they're up there. If they win those supreme, that Supreme Court judge vote on the first, they're going to take two seats right away, redistrict them. That means if Louisiana and North Carolina hold, which I think it will, that means we have to basically, if the redistricting is holding those states, we then have to hold New York and California. Or Hakeem Jeffries is going to speaker of the House and Hakeem Jeffrey is going to raise $2 billion or $3 billion, because up there telling all those billionaires, you give me the money, the first thing I'm going to do in the first week of January 2027 is Impeach Donald Trump. They're going to do it. You watch. They're going to do it. They have no plan. It's destroy Trump and imprison the people around him. And if they were to steal the 2028 election, if they're to steal the 2020 election, they will put Trump in prison. He's right. They have no other plan for America. Not in the four years Trump was in power the first time. Not for Biden's four years and not now. They have one directive, to purge Trump and MAGA from utopia. It's beginning to look a lot like 2016. Only this time, I'm watching from the other side of the door. I escaped, but only just barely. I sometimes look back at who I was then and scratch my head. How could I have been that easily manipulated? How could I have believed them? I believed it all. I read every book on Putin. I hung on every word that came out of Rachel Maddow's mouth. I believed the New York Times had our best interests at heart. I could not believe or even imagine that the people I trusted would eventually expose themselves as weaponized partisan propaganda machines. I try to connect with the Democratic centrist I used to be because that is still where most of my friends and family are, not to mention all of American culture and most institutions. They live in a completely separate reality and I live in this one. The only comparison I can make takes us back to just before the last Civil War. One reality not only justified slavery but also existed inside a utopian antebellum paradise of southern belles and wealthy plantations, but also believed ending slavery was an existential crisis they could not survive. How else to convince so many to go fight and die for a cause? The pre war propaganda whipped both sides into a frenzy that would eventually take them to war. From war history in the decade prior to the Civil War, the American press began flourishing and evolved rapidly in terms of technology, output and distribution. Meanwhile, the number of newspapers expanded in a new style of weekly pictorial publications filled with comics and illustrations became popular and widespread in northern and southern states. This mass distribution of picture based media was eagerly and voraciously consumed by the American public. It also proved ideal for distributing and disseminating propaganda and successfully pushed divisive ideologies from both sides of the divide. Podcast two cartoons, one pro slavery, one anti slavery Sound familiar podcast listeners? A tweet by Pat a billionaire buys another yacht. Grandma loses Medicaid. Poor children starve. Veterans lose their jobs and health care. That's the trade off lawmakers are making cutting health care and food programs for tens of millions to fund tax cuts for the ultra rich. Hashtag Lock Trump up. Hashtag impeach Trump and a picture of Republicans laughing around a table. Republican family values to cut Medicare, Medicaid, osha, education, Social Security, the CDC and another tweet from Paul Duginski. According to a story in the Atlantic, Donald Trump believes he's invincible. He said I run the country and the world. The RMS Titanic was thought to be unsinkable. Impeach Trump, Lock Trump up. Convicted felon Unhinged Trump market crash, Trump's 100 days and a cartoon of Trump I run the World on the Trump tanic. And here is a montage of tweets calling for Trump's impeachment. When the Union army won the war, however, their utopian paradise in the south was upended which kicked off episodes of mass hysteria that would eventually lead to Jim Crow laws, the KKK segregation, and worse. It's easy, especially for the modern day left, to see those crimes against humanity as a disease that lives inside of white people. The sin of racism, a war they believe they're still fighting today. Here is Tim Walls. I knew I was on the ticket, I would argue, because we did a lot of amazing progressive things in Minnesota that improved people' lives. But I also was on the ticket, quite honestly, you know, because I. I could code talk to white guys watching football, fixing their truck, doing that, that I could put them at ease. I was the permission structure to say, look, you can do this and vote for this, and, and you look across those swing states, with the exception of Minnesota, the side that suddenly had all of the wealth and power after the rise of Silicon Valley and the marriage between the Obama coalition and culture, and was lacking only one spiritual relief. I was part of it. I was a woke blogger. Although we did not use that word then and many don't dare use it now, what mattered to me was elevating non whites and other marginalized groups in the film industry. That gave me, a white woman, a sense of purpose, a deeper meaning for my work and my life, something I'd never felt before. But to be woke as translated for white people means believing you share your country and your culture with racists afflicted with white fragility. At first it was an idea that spread, but by 2020, it was mandated. It makes sense when you consider our country expanding onto the new frontier of the Internet, where the free market, cities, towns and demographic groups mattered less than this giant swirling soup of humanity we suddenly had to make sense of. What better way than to divide us up into easily recognizable categories? 2016 was, to all of us, a sign that the Confederacy had returned. Especially since Trump was now a prominent figure on Twitter, just like Obama had been. We saw his win as an act of war. We were to obstruct, block, shun, attack, or resist. He was not to be allowed to govern, which would ensure his destruction. Or so we thought. What we didn't do, however, was listen to the voters. They were invisible to us because we wrote them off as angry white deplorables clinging to their guns and religion. They don't deserve representation. No, it wasn't we who failed. It was Trump who invaded us and is now oppressing us. We couldn't see things any other way because we were the good side, and those people over there had to be the bad side. The nation's first black president, we believed, was hated by white Americans, and now they were coming to dismantle his legacy, our utopia, and make America white again. They still believe that it is existential to them, which explains the ongoing need to purge their utopia of threatening people. Those same realities that decided who got to stay and who had to go also existed in George Orwell's 1984 what is Cancel culture anyway, but virtual gulags? Anyone who didn't agree with the reversed hierarchy was out. You couldn't just go along with it. You had to believe it. You had to love Big Brother. Orwell had it so right when he wrote in that last paragraph, he was in the public dock confessing everything, implicating everybody. I could feel it. The mass dehumanization, it didn't sit right with me. I was disgusted by how my side was behaving. But it wasn't until I walked in the shoes of Trump supporters that I knew for sure this really was a civil war. No, Trump supporters were not getting lynched or put in concentration camps or a gulag. But the mechanisms at play are the same. I've never seen people in America feel emboldened to attack another group this way, but no doubt it has happened many times throughout our history. Daniels says he didn't cause this. A stranger did at this gas station shortly after he found out he supports Donald Trump for president. He comes here often and says Sunday he and the clerk were talking politics. He said, well, who you gonna vote for? I said, Trump. Daniels says another man nearby overheard his response and asked him him why he supported Trump. He told the man he thinks Trump can get the country back on track. And that's when he says the man became very angry, calling him racial slurs. Daniels says he backed off and the man walked out. But when Daniels went out to put gas in his car, he says the man came at him again. He said, hey, I need to talk to you. I said, partner, I don't want to talk to nobody. I said, look, that stuff's over with. I was just voicing opinion, so were you. And I said, come on, let me go get some gas. Like that. And he reached over, grabbed me by this arm, turn around and just come down with his left hand, right across here. A man claims that he was attacked for wearing a Make America Great Again hat at a local Mexican restaurant tonight. The woman who hit him in the video is facing charges. Freedom of speech is genocide, homeboy. It doesn't matter. Is that what you're trying to say? Allows me to Wear that hat as much as I want. You see, Riverside Jonathan Sparks is passionate about his political beliefs. But he says those beliefs were attacked right here on Saturday night. And oh, was it painful. My ankle was just hanging there. As Sparks was walking downtown, a man attacked him from behind. I felt a very strong grasp on my hat and it pulled me back and grabbed a lot of hair. The assailant had jumped onto my ankle from behind. And so I, not knowing yet that my ankle was broken into four pieces, turned around to grab and take the hat back and my hands latched onto the hat. They both fell to the ground. I heard the words Hitler and Nazi and Trump and he was shouting, shouting things like that. And then he came over top of me and he just, over and over again he hit me. People nearby the video shows classmates shoving the 12 year old St Louis boy while yelling at him for supporting the president. His outraged mother says she, she is horrified. I saw him being berated and bullied and beat, literally beat, because he feels strongly about the world. Today, a Central Texas man has been arrested for attacking a teenager wearing a red Make America Great Again hat. This was all happening at Whataburger. Yeah, of all places. But incredible video. Watch what happened early Wednesday morning. Supporting the president. Now you ain't supporting. There's an expletive there. And then he shoves that water or that drink into the teen's face. The teens were left stunned. To justify that they are the good side. They must continue to find victims of oppression based on skin color or gender identity. They don't seem to care that much about the hollowed out, torn down neighborhoods in the middle of the country where people of all skin colors are suffering. Now it has to be those who come from other countries, helpless and faceless, defined only by one the color of their skin. That is how illegal immigrants have become religious symbols on the left now and why their crimes are erased from the narrative and victims of their crimes are ignored. Are they importing slave labor or are they importing more marginalized groups to justify their moral superiority and preserve their power? Are they dropping 30,000 Haitian migrants into a small, economically depressed town in the middle of America for the same reason they race swap Disney movies to root out the racists who dare object? It's not the wall anymore separating families at the border because the Democrats botched that whole thing so badly. The message was sent far and wide that the border was open. Remember the false narrative of whipping migrants? They are so heavily invested in this cause now, they can't say Covid came from a lab. Or that there might be still such a thing as a terrorist from an Islamic country, or that any black person could ever commit any crime. They shamelessly use people as living virtue signals as shields for absolution. Senator Van Hollen Touching Kilmar Abrigo Garcia's arm is the new AOC in a white shirt and matching pants, crying before the cameras. They just rearrange the players. The song remains the same. This is what they're selling to a beleaguered America. Open the border, you racists. Even when Kilmar Garcia is outed as both a domestic abuser and probably a former member of Ms. 13, he's still a hero to them because they put him in one of their protected groups. Like George Floyd from a tree in my wealthy, white, liberal neighborhood. A picture. Bring Kilmar home. No trial, no prison. Add recent Testimony by a DEA agent in the Senate identifying Garcia's tattoos as MS.13. Are you familiar with MS.13? Yes, sir. Briefly. What are they? They're a terrorist organization. Yeah, they've been designated a foreign terrorist organization. Yes, sir. They're involved in drugs. Fentanyl extortion, kidnapping, drugs intimidation, money laundering. In your time in the dea, do they have, like, membership cards? Not necessarily the membership cards, but they are well recognized based on tattoos and different. Do you have a photo I think our office provided to you? We spoke. Yeah, we spoke about it earlier. Yes, sir. Can you give this to. This is a photo of tattoos of Mr. Garcia. Much attention has been paid to his case. I think he's in Venezuela. Can you see the photo here? Yes, sir. I can have a copy of it. Okay. Based on your time and experience and expertise in the dea, what does that photo or those markings suggest to you? Well, they suggest that he's an Ms. 13 member. That. Those are his markings. That's his brand. Not only my time at the dea, but currently I participate. The. The. Start with a leaf. What's that? A sign of? Marijuana. Okay, the next one is your smiley face. Okay. And the next one is. I believe that's a one. I can't. It's a little blurred out for me, sir. And then the last one's a three backwards. Okay, so based on your time as a DEA agent in the field, particularly in Mexico, these TAS twos are consistent with Ms. 13 associations. Yes, sir, that's correct. Do you know of any other set of combinations that would suggest some other organization this represents with this particular one? No, sir. From the other side of the door now, I can see that it was unseemly for the side that had all of the money, all of the power, and all of the culture to cosplay. We were the oppressed side, but we did that by borrowing from the oppressed classes that we claimed as our own. Therefore, they could never really rise because their status as oppressed people gave them and us power in a culture that measured their worth based on victimhood. Groundhog Day Resistance 2.0 has a thirst for the end game. They still want Trump in jail. One last cancel. That's what it'll look like after Trump leaves office. They would prefer his supporters be deported or at least exiled and never seen or heard from again. A tweet from James Tate. We need to deport the red hats and replace them with immigrants. Off a tweet that says anyone who can walk three grueling months with a child to escape death and violence and want a better life can live next to me any Damn time with 19,000 likes. Oppression is the new free trade import the oppressed, because rich people have run out of ways to give their lives meaning while also sending them to work jobs they think Americans won't do. Not to mention supporting trade policies that exploit slave labor in other countries. But, hey, it's okay with James Carville, so why not? That's the nature. And by the way, I have on six items of clothes. Shoes, socks, jeans, skivvies, T shirt, and sweatshirt. You know how many of these were made in America? None. None. And I don't want to live in a country that makes T shirts. I can buy them from somewhere. Wait, wait, wait. You don't want to live in a country that makes T shirts? Yeah, that's. Yeah, we don't need to do that. We make airplanes, we make movies, but we drill oil. We make all kinds of things. We don't need to make T shirts. But I do want to live in a country that makes cars. And don't. I drive. I drive a man. So you think I know where the steering wheel. You think I know where the tires have not cared? No. They need both a steady stream of the oppressed and an endless supply of oppressors for their utopia to survive. So everyone who doesn't agree with them must be a Nazi podcast listener. Here's a tweet from Decoding Fox News. Nothing problematic about promoting what the Nazis called Aryan traits for an entire country. Does anyone involved with Trump just stop and think for five seconds before posting something? And a picture of Caroline Levitt wearing a T shirt that says Make America Blonde Again, here are some examples of crazy people from TikTok to all of you who keep insisting that right now is the time for us to keep extending olive branches to that side. What part of these people have had 200 years to evolve on their own and they have clearly refused to do so? It's not clicking in for people at this point. At the end of the last Civil War, that's exactly what America did in order to maintain the Union together, everybody was allowed to remain as they were. No growth, no change. I mean, the fact that Confederate statues were up for this long tells you what my still willfully blind Americans. So again, to all the people who are saying that we have to go right back to the old system that clearly got us nowhere. What's the definition of insanity again? Huh? What's the definition of insanity? It's weird how white conservatives get called racist and then they're like, oh, white people get called racist over every little thing. And I'm like, that's weird. I'm white and I never get called racist. I wonder why you do. You know, the problem isn't that Donald Trump is a terrible human being. He is, but he's not the problem. The problem is that so many of his supporters are just like him or even worse, and they don't care. That's the problem. Donald Trump is the problem, but he's not the big problem. The big problem is that so many of his supporters are just like him. Hi. So this is just a message for my fellow white ladies. I need you to use your ears and not get defensive too fast, please. Thank you. I need everyone to take a deep breath and I need you to stop saying that we are becoming the Handmaid's Tale or that they're trying to make us Handmaids. Okay? There's a lot of reasons. One, it's a fictional book. But two, do you realize that book mirrors things that have happened to women of color in this country for centuries? Particularly indigenous and black women? Did you know that? So I need to stop seeing white women talking about how we are headed towards Handmaids tail territory, because for most other women in this country, they've been there their whole lives. White people only respect violence. And that's why when I'm outside of work, I don't hesitate to jump down their throats anytime they try to play with me because they know exactly what the they be doing. The only grace I have is for people that look like me. Other than that, foot on throat 24 7, here's your reminder that Trans people existing does nothing negative to your life, you crybaby bitch. Have a nice day. The hottest men are feminist men. Maga, lonely and compensating. They need their little treehouse bullies club. No girls allowed. Because either A, they don't like girls, you know what I mean? Or girls don't like them. When not if this economy goes to absolute and the dollar has no value anymore and the shelves are empty and everything is so expensive that nobody can possibly afford anything. I think when everyone starts to leave, you should not be able to immigrate to another country. If you voted for Trump, because you're the one who caused this, he's doing exactly what he said he was going to do. He wanted to be a dictator. He wanted to install these tariffs and keep all the immigrants out. Whatever, okay? So you don't get to go to another country. You have to stay here and suffer with what you voted for. And I have no remorse for that. After a decade of this madness. Most Americans, however, are just done. We don't want our kids indoctrinated in preschool or elementary school or by Hollywood. That's why even now, despite the polls, the tariffs, the chaos, Americans still say, yeah, we'll take that guy who'd be doing a better job as president. Guess who comes out on top within the margin of error, but comes on top. This looks a lot like the election result, right? Trump, 45%, two points ahead of Harris at 43%. 12% say they'd be doing about the same. But this is the key nugget here. It's not just about regretting that vote. It's literally saying who would be doing the better job right now. And Trump continues to score a higher percentage of the vote than Kamala Harris. This looks a heck of a lot like the election result. We have just seen this in poll after poll after poll. Despite the fact that Trump's favorable ratings aren't too hot to trot, when he's matched up against whom he was matched up in 2024, he still, across the polls, scores a higher percentage than Kamala Harris does? Even if they don't know exactly what she would have done, they still went for Donald Trump. Okay, what about when he's matched up against congressional Democrats who we know have had some pretty rough numbers? Yeah, they have had some pretty rough numbers. So Kamala Harris obviously doesn't hold elected office right now, but Democrats in Congress sure do. So who do you trust more on the US Main problems? The main problems, The United States. Well, what do we have Here, it's the same exact picture, folks. It's the same exact picture. When you match Donald Trump against his actual competition. Donald Trump comes out ahead. Look at this. 40% to congressional Democrats, 32%. Going to make a big circle here. But the bottom line is when you look at Donald Trump in a vacuum, it's one thing, but when you actually match him up against folks in the real world, all of a sudden his numbers look considerably better. And when you match him up against his main competition at this point, Democrats in Congress, he is more trusted on the main problems facing the United States right now. In fact, it's not even close. It's an eight point advantage, which in this politics, well, that's a wide ocean, it's huge. And maybe tells the Democrats that their messaging is not working at this point in time. All right, speaking of the big issues, which party is better? Never in all of these 10 years of fighting this civil war have the Democrats come to terms with reality. The only reason Trump is in power now is that the American people voted for him. The only way that doesn't matter is if democracy doesn't matter. Because those people and those votes do not matter. They offer no relief, no hope for the future, nothing except their unending obsession with getting Trump going on. A decade by now, they already lost the war. They just don't realize it yet. So they will have to impeach if they take the House because they know that if MAGA lives on, that will mean their entire movement is gone with the wind. Thank you for listening to this podcast. Sashastone.substack.com and remember to thine own self be true. It's time to move on it's time to get going what lies ahead I have no way of knowing but under my feet baby Grace is going it's time to move on it's time to get going Broken skyline Moving through the airport she's an honest defector Conscientious subjector Now her own protector Broken skyline which way, which way to love land? Which way to something better? Which way to forgiveness? Which way do I go? It's time to move on it's time to get going what lies ahead I have no way of knowing but under my feet, baby, grass is growing it's time to move on it's time to get going Sometime or later Getting the words wrong Wasting the meaning and losing the rhyme I got nauseous adrenaline it's like breaking up a dog fight Like a deer in the headlights Frozen in real time I'm losing my mind it's time to move on it's time to get going what lies ahead I have no way of knowing but under my feet Baby grass is growing it's time to move on it's time to get going it's time to move on it's time to get going yeah it's time to move on it's time to get going and what lies ahead I have no way of knowing but under my feet b Grass is growing it's time to move on Time to get going it's time to move on Time to get going.