Loading summary
Transcript92 lines
- [00:00]
Sponsor/Advertisement Voice
This message is sponsored by dsw, the birthplace of the humble brag, full of all kinds of shoes that get you at prices that get your budget. And when there are never ending options for every style, mood, occasion and budget, there is unlimited freedom to play. And that's something to brag about. So go ahead, stock up on fresh sneakers from your favorite brands or try those boots you always secretly knew you could pull off. Find the shoes that get you at prices that get your budget, dsw. Let them surprise you.
- [00:33]
Terry Gross
This is FRESH air. I'm Terry Gross. Laura Loomer is a hero in much of the MAGA world. She's an unofficial advisor to President Trump and describes herself as Trump's chief loyalty enforcer, a proud Islamophobe and a prophet who speaks the truth.
- [00:52]
Antonia Hitchens
I'm a very, very aggressive person, which.
- [00:54]
Terry Gross
Is why a lot of people have.
- [00:56]
Antonia Hitchens
Very strong feelings about me.
- [00:57]
Terry Gross
Some people like me.
- [00:58]
Antonia Hitchens
Some people, I don't really think people like me. They either love me or they hate me. It's not like a lukewarm feeling, right? It's not like, oh, yeah, I kind.
- [01:06]
Terry Gross
Of like, I kind of don't.
- [01:07]
Antonia Hitchens
People either really, like, really love me.
- [01:09]
Terry Gross
Or they just, they hate me. To those who love her, she's Trump's protector and informs him about conspiracies against him. To her detractors, she's a wacky conspiracy theorist who uses her connection to Trump, as well as her following on social media and her streaming show, Loomer Unleashed, to have people she accuses of disloyalty fired. It appears she's been pretty successful. She considers herself a journalist, although she doesn't follow journalistic ethics and what she writes often has a distorted relationship or no relationship with the facts. When many top news organizations declined to submit to the Pentagon's new rule that credentialed Pentagon reporters could only write information that was officially approved by the Pentagon, Loomer was one of the replacements for the reporters who left. She's been banned for hate speech by Facebook, Instagram and Twitter, but was reinstated on Twitter Now X after it was bought by Elon Musk. Loomer describes what she does as a selfless act for which she's not compensated. But she has her own company now doing opposition research and other consulting. Questions have been raised about whether her efforts to take down people she sees as disloyal to Trump are being funded secretly by individuals or groups with special interests. My guest Antonia Hitchens has written a profile of Laura Loomer titled Laura Loomer's Endless Payback that's in this week's New Yorker. Hitchens is a staff writer for the magazine. As part of her research, she spent a lot of time with Loomer, including at Charlie Kirk's memorial and and at Loomer's home, where she records her video show. Hitchens also interviewed Loomer allies and detractors. Antonia Hitchens, welcome to FRESH air. Let's start with some of the conspiracy theories that Loomer has promoted, the sort.
- [03:08]
Antonia Hitchens
Of foundational conspiracy that first drew Loomer into Trump. And her description was that he was, as she puts it, one of the first people to call out that Obama was not born in America and thus should not have been president. And that started out for her the sense of being in a conversation or dialogue with Donald Trump even before she had had the occasion to ever meet him, just watching him on Fox. Growing up, she was drawn to his conspiracy that Barack Obama was born outside of America. And that kind of begins for her the sense that there are other, you know, factually loose statements he makes and that she echoes that are really brought into the mainstream.
- [03:47]
Terry Gross
One of the things she's known for are very extreme protest actions. That's part of the way she made her reputation and became visible. Describe one or two of her most extreme protests.
- [04:01]
Antonia Hitchens
Sure. So I think we consider Laura Loomer now someone who exists very much online, very much on screens. But there was a time where, you know, she was banned from pretty much any site that would let her post for many years. And so during that time, she describes having almost a break with reality where she was driven so insane by not being able to access the Internet that she could only protest in person. She often would carry a bullhorn with her, kind of trying to get more attention from people. In one case, after her ban from Twitter came down, they considered her, I think, a dangerous individual who was spreading hateful conduct. She goes to Twitter's offices in New York and chains herself to the door with her bullhorn and remains there screaming for a few hours until police cut through her handcuffs and remove her. And I think for many people, that was the first time that they sort of became just even vaguely aware of this person on their radar. For others, it was when she stormed the production of Julius Caesar being put on in Central Park. And at that time, Donald Trump was being used as a likeness for Julius Caesar. And she felt that that was going to open up the question of political violence. And whether or not, as she puts it, you know, were liberals then going to be tempted to try to Assassinate the president by seeing a likeness of him stabbed on stage. So she storms the stage, interrupts the production, and tries to kind of make the point that she is already protecting this person. And then in another instance, she having been banned from Facebook, having read also Sheryl Sandberg's memoir, Lean in, she goes to the Facebook offices in California and sort of tries to insinuate herself into their workplace environment, saying, you know, I'm leaning in. I just want to be here. I just want to be heard. Why don't you want me here? And so I think for a number of people, their kind of introduction to Loomer was seeing these bizarre public stunts that were sort of hard to read.
- [05:52]
Terry Gross
She told you that she believes she's some sort of modern day oracle. She wrote, like Cassandra, the Trojan priestess of Apollo in Greek mythology who was cursed to utter true prophecies. I have been given the gift of prophecy, but I am a prophet of doom whose warnings of disaster are condemned and ignored. Do you have any insights into why she sees herself as a prophet?
- [06:21]
Antonia Hitchens
I think even to this day, despite her increased prominence, if you ask her a question about who is paying her or what her work really is or the nature of her relationship with the president, she often will double back to the idea that all she really is ultimately is a clairvoyant and that she kind of exists in this freeform way in society as someone who, before anyone else can parse what's going on. The case that you brought up just now, when she wrote that she was like Cassandra, she had stormed a hearing that Jack Dorsey, the then Twitter CEO, was testifying in about kind of complaints on behalf of many Republicans and more sort of also far right figures that they were being quote, unquote, shadow banned, which means that their voices were not being directly silenced, but that the algorithm was kind of primed to never have any of what they wrote show up. So they were in effect banned, in their view. And so Loomer storms this hearing with Jack Dorsey testifying, and she's screaming that if Dorsey doesn't stop these shadow bans against Republicans, they won't be able to speak out and the 2020 election will be stolen from them. And, you know, this is well before anything happened with January 6th, or even Trump was saying that the election had been stolen. So this notion that years before an event happens, she's screaming about it in the halls of Congress saying this will happen if you don't stop silencing us, I think in retrospect was cast by her and others as this kind of ability to see the future that led her to believe she was uniquely positioned to not just protect, but kind of profoundly understand what the president needs.
- [08:02]
Terry Gross
So Loomer ran for Congress in Florida twice and lost both times. Did Trump support her? Were they even in touch yet when she ran?
- [08:10]
Antonia Hitchens
So when Loomer runs For Congress in 2020, she runs in the district where Mar A Lago at that time was. I say in the past tense because it's since been redistricted. And so in her telling of that race, the president endorsed her and voted for her in her second race in 2022. There were sort of a slew of candidates who came about because they were primary candidates who had not endorsed Trump's kind of big lie about the 2020 election. And so in Loomer's telling of both of her elections, Trump not only voted for her, but endorsed her strongly. If you speak to other people who were around during that time, they recall a meeting between the president, Susie Wiles, now his chief of staff, and Loomer's then campaign manager, where she petitioned Trump for two hours to endorse her candidate, Laura Loomer, and he declined, saying that she was too controversial and he didn't want to get involved. Loomer has since taken tweets that the president made about, you know, Laura being a patriot or Laura being a strong person to say that Trump endorsed her, but he never kind of weighed in on her race, but she still began to count him as a really close ally, despite, you know, what other stories might say there.
- [09:26]
Terry Gross
Loomer told you, she said, I don't want to say, oh, President Trump is me, or I see myself in Trump, but I do. Every time I listen to him speak, I feel like I'm listening to myself speak to myself. How did she become so obsessed with supporting Trump?
- [09:46]
Antonia Hitchens
I think that in the years when Bloomer was kicked off of most of these social media websites and Trump was starting to make this rise, she really began to see her story as deeply, deeply bound up with his, as these two people who were not taken seriously, not really seen as anyone who could be part of the mainstream. In Trump's case, you know, later, he's also not allowed to post on Twitter. And she saw their kind of similar marginal roles in American politics as not just bound up, but also kind of rising and falling at the same time and, you know, being emotionally connected to him, even though for years they weren't speaking. I think this begins in 2014, when Loomer is in college in Miami and She happens to see Trump on a golf course and you know, at this point he doesn't have a Secret Service detail. So she gets as close to him as she possibly can and yells, you should run for president, I love you. And they take a selfie together. And to her, that kind of kicks off this relationship, as it were to her that, you know, she understands what he should do and he understands that she has advice to give him that's valid. But it's not clear that there's really any direct communication until they have a meeting together at Mar a Lago in 2023 and they've. She's reposted his content, he's reposted her content from time to time. But for me, it was just really interesting that an almost decades long sense of kinship was developed based on kind of one off interaction at a rope line on a golf course.
- [11:21]
Terry Gross
Trump offered her a job and had to rescind the offer because of objections from his own staff at the White House. Do you know what the objections were from his own staff?
- [11:32]
Antonia Hitchens
So I think this carries on until even today when you hear that, you know, Loomer is despised by everyone in the West Wing except for the president in the Oval Office. That starts out even before this job offer, when in 2022, around the time of her race, she's getting in fights at Mar A Lago, she's alienating other Trump backed candidates, she's saying that the Republican Party needs a hostile takeover. She's not willing to make nice with any of the kind of coalition builders who are needed to be brought into this America first movement to bring them to actual electoral victory. And so I think she's seen as this really toxic kind of dead weight around the neck of the party that would be better to do away with. And Trump, you know, is willing to take a meeting with her and to say, you're fantastic, you should work for me. But I think the staff immediately walks it back saying this person will be nothing but a liability and has caused you already kind of a host of problems you may not know about in your own movement and in this second administration. I think to many loyalty would be described as kind of competence and falling in line and not speaking out against the President because they feel that the first term was so stymied by these kind of wars happening in the open between different factions and leaks and sort of general turmoil. So the most loyal allies Trump has, you know, if you think of Susie Wiles is just as he calls her, the ice queen, basically in the Luminorous conception of loyalty. Loyalty means it's like a different kind of love. Almost like even to call out someone who you love to tell them in public that they've failed you. Increasingly, Loomer feels completely free to criticize Trump, the object of her greatest affection, to tell him, you know, you shouldn't have. The Syrian president at the White House, when you make a post about radical Islam, you don't have to use the word radical. She's almost taken to, like, she has more expertise somehow than even the person she most cares for. And I think that's what in many corners of Washington has really led to her being seen as a liability because she feels willing in a climate where there's meant to be no dissent against the president, as he says to Congress, no dissent, just vote for what I like. Here is an outside advisor who's willing to say, you're doing it wrong. Listen to me. It's the randomness and the kind of willingness to see something on the Internet that might pique your interest that most closely describes the way in which they interact. There's no sense of a formal role or even the formal rhythm to the way in which the conversations take place. And they're both very cagey about even kind of putting any specifics to the nature of when or how they're in touch.
- [14:19]
Terry Gross
She takes credit for having a lot of people in government fired, and maybe she should take credit because it seems she makes a statement about them being disloyal to Trump and then the next day they're gone. Who are some of the people who she takes credit for getting fired?
- [14:38]
Antonia Hitchens
So in early April, after Loomer meets with the President in the Oval Office, he immediately dismisses six members of his National Security Council, as well as General Timothy Hawke and his deputy, Wendy Noble. Hawk was the head of the National Security Agency at that time. And those are because of connections she imagines are too profound between those individuals and Mark Milley and James Clapper, who had been kind of linked to criticizing Trump. And in the aftermath of that meeting, I think what we see for the first time is Loomer taking credit for firing more than seven high ranking national security officials with no clear reason behind these sort of vague, specious allegations of just general disloyalty. And so I think that's when she begins to really be able to present herself as someone to be scared of. Because if, you know, if Loomer thinks you're disloyal, then that could be something that becomes actionable.
- [15:37]
Terry Gross
Is there a fear in Trump's White House, that if you say anything negative about Laura Loomer, you will be fired.
- [15:47]
Antonia Hitchens
I think what's so interesting here is that depending on who you ask, she's either this completely extraneous, random nuisance figure or someone to be truly frightened of. And I've definitely come to believe that there are people who were preemptively not hired because of different accusations she had either kind of in the works that she was going to make or that she had already made and was threatening to take public. And I wouldn't say fear so much, maybe as vexation from a managerial perspective of is it really worth this whole boondoggle for us to go through what's going to be, you know, a big online mess when we could just hire somebody else? And so that, I think, kind of sense of someone looking over your shoulder and the kind of mild paranoia you get from that is more the more the impact than, you know, real fear.
- [16:40]
Terry Gross
Now, Loomer says she doesn't get paid for being Trump's loyalty enforcer. She just wants to do everything in her power to. To support him. But she also has a business doing opposition research where you dig up dirt on your opponent. And she does other consulting, too. Some people wonder who is actually funding her work, and if some of the things that she says she's just doing out of a passion for Trump's beliefs in his presidency, is she really getting paid to criticize certain people and those funders are secret?
- [17:21]
Antonia Hitchens
As soon as I started reporting on Loomer in Washington, I would hear every day, she's getting paid and everyone is working with her, and everyone is compromised in some way because Loomer is in the orbit that is now necessary to use when you want to influence the president. And so I had kind of carried that through my reporting as much as I could. And, of course, if you can't confirm something, it's not true. So I had laid out as much as I could about just what I knew about where it seemed like she was being influenced or compensated. And she had always said to me when I would bring up these questions to her, I'm not a lobbyist, I'm a clairvoyant. And, you know, the implication that her work was about anything other than purity and love was really insulting to her.
- [18:09]
Terry Gross
You also raised the question that some people have raised. If she wasn't getting compensated, why would she care so much about Hewlett Packard's acquisition of Juniper Networks? I don't even know what Juniper Networks is, but why is that? Suspicious?
- [18:24]
Antonia Hitchens
Well, I think you have someone who for years is posting out of real passion and with a really intense frequency and volume about a number of different things. But they weren't the specific niche interests that lobbyists and consultants and lawyers care about. And they weren't phrased in the terms of, as you say, almost kind of jargon level. And so you see those kind of creeping into these posts about how wonderful Trump is. And there's a point at which I think people start to wonder, when did the original Laura become the kind of Laura who is working for a number of different interests and weighing in on, as you mentioned, the HPE Juniper merger?
- [19:08]
Terry Gross
Are the questions about funding related to the opposition research that her company gets paid for? Are there questions that the line is crossing between the opposition research she's getting paid for and the things that she's saying in support of Trump?
- [19:28]
Antonia Hitchens
I think what's notable is how porous the barrier is between all of these things.
- [19:33]
Terry Gross
You know, and I should mention here, too, that, you know, a lot of politicians have opposition research to use against their opponent. So opposition research is nothing new and no longer considered a radical thing to have. But it's a question of what you do with that information.
- [19:56]
Antonia Hitchens
And I think especially when it comes to lobbying, if you register with Farah as a lobbyist, it's clear why you would advance a certain position, and it's because you are a lobbyist for a foreign government. I think in the past, there would have been no reason why someone posting online all day from home would be subjected to the same kinds of disclosures as a lobbyist in Washington going to a steakhouse. But as one of Loomer's allies put it to me, you know, if Laura posts online and nearly 2 million people see it, including her following in the US government, and then their position is changed based on that, that's not lobbying. Lobbying would only be if she had taken a meeting officially that she had acknowledged took place between, you know, a member of Congress after meeting with foreign government. And so it's not as though she's skirting any requirement that her position would impose on her. She's just existing in a new kind of netherworld of everything is allowed.
- [20:56]
Terry Gross
My guest is New Yorker staff writer Antonia Hitchens. She profiles Laura Loomer in the current issue of the magazine in an article titled Laura Loomer's Endless Payback. We'll be back after a short break. I'm Terry Gross, and this is FRESH AIR.
- [21:12]
Sponsor/Advertisement Voice
This message comes from AT&T, America's First Network is also its fastest and most reliable based on RootMetrics. United States Root Score Report 1H 2025 tested with best commercially available smartphones on three national mobile networks across all available network types. Your experiences may vary. RootMetrics rankings are not an endorsement of AT&T. When you compare, there's no comparison. AT&T.
- [21:40]
NPR Promo/Other Hosts
Hey, it's Ray from Car Talk. Are you tired of all the depth and thoughtful care that goes into NPR shows? Want some good old fashioned goofing around and stumbling to figure out what's going on? Well, I've been taking occasional car questions again. You can hear them by signing up for NPR along with lots of other bonus content. Just go to plus.npr.org I'm Rachel Martin.
- [22:03]
Antonia Hitchens
If you're tired of small talk, check out the Wild Card Podcast. I invite influential thinkers to open up about the big topics we all think about but rarely talk about. Tune in this fall to hear Mel Robbins, Malala Yousafzai and Brene Brown talk about everything from grief and God to ambition and forgiveness. Watch or listen on the NPR app.
- [22:23]
Terry Gross
YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts so you learn a bit about her childhood and what her early life was like. Her parents were Republicans. Were they active in politics?
- [22:39]
Antonia Hitchens
Loomer told me that her parents were, quote, unquote, registered Republicans. I think as a way of gesturing it a certain kind of down the line, we vote for whoever is on the ballot in Arizona, but not especially engaged and, you know, going to protests or anything like that. She describes her own evolution as, you know, having nothing to do with the way that she was raised, more having to do with kind of a reaction to what she saw as overly progressive values being imposed on her in the setting of her prep school and then also in the setting of her university.
- [23:14]
Terry Gross
Loomer told you that she has a brother who has schizophrenia and at age 12, that her father enrolled and her other brother in boarding school because their parents were afraid that home could be an unsafe environment. Was that because of her brother's mental health problems? Like, do you know what made home unsafe?
- [23:38]
Antonia Hitchens
Loomer describes a very chaotic and in her telling, sometimes violent environment in which her brother's outbursts consumed the household. And so her father, as she tells it, felt most comfortable sending his other two children to boarding school to be able to focus on the one child who was in need of more care. And then also in Laura's telling, to sort of protect her and her other brother from that environment. And so they go off to this school in the Arizona desert where she describes an intense feeling of isolation. There was a curfew for phone calls. There was no Internet. There were very few people there. And I think, to me, it sort of conjured the initial sense of being cut off from the world, from her family, even all these years before she's really cut off from the Internet. And I think describes kind of almost like a. Almost a continuation of the sense that she's just completely cast out on her own with no way of accessing conversation.
- [24:39]
Terry Gross
So we know that Laura Loomer was asked to seek therapy, like mental health therapy in 2020. Karen Giorno, who was a Trump advisor who had led Trump's Florida operations through the 2015 primary, she was tapped to run a congressional campaign for Loomer, and she acceptedgiorno accepted under the conditions that Loomer agree not to lie about other candidates, meet with a psychiatrist once a quarter and stay on her meds. What do you know about that?
- [25:15]
Antonia Hitchens
So I think this has been something that Loomer always phrases in such different terms from those who speak about her. Loomer describes a sense of being driven basically to the point that she snapped after she was banned from social media. And in that time period, she is doing cocaine a lot. She threatens to drive her car off a cliff. It's a period which she describes as, you know, incredibly riddled by anxiety and depression and a sense of what she later goes on to say, ptsd, which she sought therapy for. Her campaign manager, however, describes, you know, being asked to run this race for Loomer and having an intense skepticism of her, partly for her fringe views and partly for the sense that she wasn't calibrated to kind of run a campaign in public and comport herself in the manner that, you know, you'd want a candidate to be able to, you to. But Giorno imposes the conditions that you brought up. And Giorno then, in her telling, by the time Laura runs the second time in 2022, had stopped honoring those conditions. And that was kind of the beginning of her divorce from any notion of being brought into the party because she would lash out constantly at all other Republicans and even different operatives who have gone on to work in very high ranking roles in the White House. I think she put them off intensely during that period of possible intense distress emotionally or, you know, possibly just a personality that is at odds with group work.
- [26:48]
Terry Gross
What were her first contacts with the right?
- [26:52]
Antonia Hitchens
When Loomer was in college at Barry University in Miami, she starts to carry out these kind of quasi political stunts, and she's invited to a conference hosted by David Horowitz, the conservative writer, at the breakers in Palm Beach. And at that conference, she recalls meeting James o', Keefe, the founder of Project Veritas, the kind of undercover sting operation that will take videos of people without them knowing to then, you know, in many cases show a sort of hypocrisy of liberalism, to summarize it broadly. And Loomer's first contact with the right, I think, is in these fringier circles of people like these Veritas operatives, who then she seeks out saying, I want to work with you, and I want to. By then, she's been loomering people. She describes wanting to conduct her own kind of public humiliation stunts, but in the context of an official job. And so she starts working with o' Keeffe's organization to, for example, go around New York City in the aftermath of Eric Garner's murder by doing things like filming his family undercover in a taxi, getting them to say that Al Sharpton, who's organizing the protests against Garner's murder, is all about the money. So we see her coming into politics not through any traditional kind of desire to be in electoral politics, but much more the kind of rabble rousing out in the open, stunt based politics that has come to color much of what the right is good at doing and deceptive.
- [28:33]
Terry Gross
Project Veritas was famous for people going undercover, wearing disguises and falsely representing who they were, you know, videoing with hidden cameras, responses to the Project Veritas questions, then taking them sometimes out of context and spreading them online to get those people in trouble, to get the organizations in trouble. And there were organizations that were liberal or supported abortion. I think Planned Parenthood was one of those organizations. Right.
- [29:11]
Antonia Hitchens
I think it's the beginning of seeing Loomer publicly distort and recast truths to represent the truth that she wants to put forth. When we see her carrying out these stunts for Veritas, which, as you mentioned, has a very specific worldview, she's trained in that kind of guerrilla warfare.
- [29:31]
Terry Gross
So after a successful stunt for Project Veritas, she takes a Veritas camera and uses it to troll her own college by talking to administrators and suggesting that the college start an ISIS club, which is sympathetic students in support of the Islamic State. Tell us more about that stunt and what the outcome was.
- [29:57]
Antonia Hitchens
Sure. So I think, fresh off of what she would cast as a victory in New York with Project Veritas, she returns to her university kind of armed with this camera and with this, I guess you could call IT skill set that she wants to start using on her own. She secretly records these interactions with administrators who are, as university administrators can be, want to do kind of patiently and slightly indulgently humoring a student's idea for a club that is meant to be sympathetic to isis. And, you know, they're kind of pushing her to make it more about humanitarian work in the Middle East. And these long interactions are captured on her secret camera leading to her expulsion. However, what's unsuccessful at her university is, in fact, very successful elsewhere. And James o' Keeffe begins to replicate a very similar version of that script at other universities around the country. And so when a different Veritas operative is implementing that script at Cornell, it becomes sort of a newsworthy enough moment that Sean Hannity features it on his show. And Trump watching Hannity then, you know, in 2015, not having yet announced his run for president, faxes James o' Keefe and says, why don't you come and meet with me? You know, I like what you're doing. And they meet in Trump Tower and discuss that and other things. And Bloomer, in her telling, was invited to that meeting with the president but could not attend because she was waylaid in Florida with paperwork to do with her expulsion. And so although she couldn't come to the meeting, she felt already like, you know, I'm on my way. I'm going to be soon. Someone who not only interacts with Donald Trump, but goes to the Oval Office. And she recalls thinking this before Trump has even announced his run.
- [31:44]
Terry Gross
Well, let me introduce you again. If you're just joining us, my guest is Antonia Hitchens. She's a staff writer for the New Yorker. And her latest article is called Laura Loomer's Endless Payback. We'll be right back. This is FRESH AIR.
- [31:59]
Antonia Hitchens
On NPR's Wildcard podcast.
- [32:01]
Terry Gross
Padma Lakshmi says she feels better at 55 than 25. I wouldn't go back to my 20s for all the money in the world. I really wouldn't. I was so hard on myself about every little thing or every, you know, imperfection.
- [32:15]
Antonia Hitchens
Watch or listen to that Wildcard conversation on the NPR app or on YouTube @NPRWildcard.
- [32:23]
NPR Promo/Other Hosts
Mothers and daughters, daughters and mothers. We explore the generational divide on our latest episode of Books We've Loved, about Amy Tan's the Joy Luck Club with the indicators Waylon Wong. Find Books we've loved on NPR's Book of the Day podcast feed on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcast. Free Speech has long been considered one of The United States most important ideals. But the idea of free speech has never really apply to everyone. Put very simply, some people have a.
- [32:58]
Antonia Hitchens
Lot more power to speak than others.
- [33:01]
NPR Promo/Other Hosts
You can listen to code switch on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [33:08]
Terry Gross
What's it like to talk with her? You spent many hours talking with her.
- [33:12]
Antonia Hitchens
It's the experience almost of talking to the Internet. There's no sense of the kind of normal cadence and rhythm of conversation. And back and forth, I think, is interrupted by the sense that one, she was banned for so long that she's almost breathless trying to get in everything she wants to say, as though there's kind of like a hangover from all the years when she couldn't speak. And then also everything is cast in this kind of very heightened, intense way of things that are trending on the Internet that to the untrained eye, to someone without a cell phone don't even have the kind of currency or intensity of the way she's speaking about them. So it can be incredibly disorienting.
- [33:56]
Terry Gross
Can you describe her home or is that too personal for her that you don't want to talk about? I'm just wondering if it offered any insights into her lifestyle or personality.
- [34:08]
Antonia Hitchens
So Loomer conducts most of her work from home, where she has her Rumble studio set up in a converted bedroom. But once the lights go off in there, the rest of the home is just a normal home. It's not kind of dressed up to be the home of a prominent figure in American life. There are four dogs who are created to eat dinner so they don't fight over each other's food. There were dog gates on most of the rooms to make sure the dogs were off the furniture. The furniture had blankets on it for the dogs. There's a home gym where she can walk on the treadmill while taking long phone calls. But her professional life very much takes place across the backdrop of a pretty casual domestic setting.
- [34:50]
Terry Gross
One of her four dogs she named Loomer. It sounds a little odd for Laura Loomer to have a dog she named Loomer and have to say, like, sit Loomer or whatever she says to the dog. Do you know why she named her dog Loomer?
- [35:09]
Antonia Hitchens
Having spent a little bit of time with her, it seemed so obvious that she would name her dog Loomer. I was almost surprised the others weren't named Loomer, but they came pre named because they were rescued.
- [35:20]
Terry Gross
Why are you not surprised?
- [35:22]
Antonia Hitchens
She's not subtle in the intensity with which she wants to cast herself as the main character in her life. Having another creature in your home with your same name wouldn't be destabilizing so much as I think comforting.
- [35:38]
Terry Gross
So one of Laura Loomer's platforms now is her show on Rumble, which is called Laura Loomer Unleashed. And her show started in a very unusual way. Like one episode that I was watching had an over 20 minute long section at the very beginning with the caption, stand by. Do you have any insights into why her show starts with a standby for over 20 minutes where all you see is images of her at home and in various places? Like, why not start the show when the actual show starts?
- [36:18]
Antonia Hitchens
Loomer has been very much keen to articulate to me over the course of my time reporting on her that she is a one woman show. She has no one working with her. She has a Capitol Hill correspondent who's in Washington kind of occasionally loomering members by just jumping out from behind a pole or something. And then she has a team of producers remotely who help her with, you know, the lights for her show and her at home studio. But Unleashed is very much a. It's a Laura production. And so there's a sense of kind of non finito ragtag. I'm pulling this together myself to her content, which I think, you know, tonally bears some resemblance to the long screeds she posts on Twitter. I think there's a style to them that's not polished and that's part of what draws in some of her support.
- [37:11]
Terry Gross
Were you surprised that Loomer agreed to be profiled by you for the New Yorker, which she may perceive as a very liberal publication by the time that.
- [37:23]
Antonia Hitchens
The New Yorker wanted to profile her. And I went back and looked at the recollections I had already from the Times over the past 18 months that my life had intersected with her. I think what surprised me was that she became a figure who would be worthy of a New Yorker profile. When I first saw her kind of in the flesh, she was, you know, storming into restaurants, filming people. She was chasing Frank Luntz to his car, asking him about Nikki Haley. She was traveling with Trump to his debate in Philadelphia. I think as the months went on. And she became this figure who shows up in the Oval Office and takes credit for firing a dozen of national security officials. It was more about squaring that person I'd seen running through Iowa with no clear role with someone who had developed for herself at least enough of a sense of a role that there was enough to write about. So I think she was flattered in some ways by being seen as having any stones left to turn over. And I think both Trump and Loomer, who accept many interviews from what is seen by them as unfavorable media, they still understand the kind of validity to continuing to push their position on even outlets who they think are incapable of seeing the truth for what they know it to be.
- [38:41]
Terry Gross
Do you know what it was like for the fact checkers to fact check this story and what the most difficult part was?
- [38:48]
Antonia Hitchens
I think the experience of any subject for a New Yorker profile dealing with the fact checkers is very intense because you're being asked, you know, what time was it when you remember getting your divorce papers or, you know, having to reconstruct on this almost molecular level these details of your life? I think in Loomer's case, she was really grateful for that process because she feels that she deals so much in the same realm of looking for truth, and she feels that she's been so maligned by every force in society who's never asked her what's true. And so to have someone call her up five times for an hour and have her reconstruct these almost mundane details of her existence that no one had put to her for many years, except maybe the New York Times at one point, briefly, I think it actually was an experience she found to be generative, and that, if anything, led her to think that perhaps there was some dignity and truth, even in journalism, coming from a very different tradition from the one that she's created for herself. You know, she would say to me often over the course of our time together, why is it when you do something, it's seen as kind of this public service exposing evil or truth? And if I do it, it's seen as Laura Loomer as a national security threat? And it was a tension in how she saw herself. And I was never able to align with her version of what she saw herself to be doing. But I think when she was asked in a pretty deadpan way by fact checkers how she conducts her life, she felt that she was being given a very straight chance to explain what it is that she does.
- [40:24]
Terry Gross
Antonia Hitchens, thank you so much for talking to us. I learned so much from your article. I appreciate it.
- [40:31]
Antonia Hitchens
Thank you so much for having me.
- [40:34]
Terry Gross
Antonia Hitchens is a staff writer for the New Yorker. Her article Laura Loomer's Endless Payback is in this week's issue. After we take a short break. Our TV critic, David Biancooli, will review the new Ken Burns PBS documentary series about the Revolutionary War. This is FRESH air.
- [40:54]
NPR Promo/Other Hosts
Making time for the news is important, but when you need a break, we've got you covered on All Songs Considered. NPR's music podcast. Think of it like a music discovery show, a well deserved escape with friends and yeah, some serious music insight. I'm Keep it real. I have no idea what this story is about.
- [41:12]
Terry Gross
Hear new episodes of All Songs Considered every Tuesday.
- [41:15]
NPR Promo/Other Hosts
Wherever you get podcasts, keeping up with the news can feel like a 24 hour job. Luckily, it is our job. Every hour on the NPR News now podcast, we take the latest, most important, important stories happening and we package them into five minute episodes so you can easily squeeze them in between meetings and on your way to that thing. Listen to the NPR News now podcast now.
- [41:40]
Antonia Hitchens
You care about what's happening in the world?
- [41:43]
NPR Promo/Other Hosts
Stay informed with NPR's State of the World podcast.
- [41:47]
Antonia Hitchens
In just a few minutes, we take you to stories around the globe.
- [41:50]
NPR Promo/Other Hosts
You might hear the latest developments in.
- [41:52]
Antonia Hitchens
World conflicts or about what global events.
- [41:56]
NPR Promo/Other Hosts
Mean for the price of your coffee. Listen to the State of the world podcast from NPR.
- [42:03]
Terry Gross
Documentary producer and director Ken Burns came to prominence 35 years ago by presenting on PBS a massively popular multi part nonfiction series called the Civil War. His latest effort, a six part series co directed by Sarah Botstein and David Schmidt, will be shown Sunday through Friday on pbs. It's called the American Revolution and our TV critic David Biancooli has this review.
- [42:32]
NPR Promo/Other Hosts
By focusing on the American Revolution, Ken Burns is revisiting some very familiar territory. His long and impressive filmography includes a history of the Congress and biographies of Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin. He's done deep dives into American military conflicts, including World War II and the Vietnam War. And throughout his career he's developed and perfected the tricks of his particular trade the evocative use of music and quotations from speeches and correspondence, the use of actors to read the words of historical participants, the zooming in and out to reveal key details in period photos, and the painstaking attention to sound effects from birds to bullets, to help bring those images to life. All of that knowledge and all of those gimmicks are utilized in the American Revolution, the new PBS six part series about the founding of our country. It's an exceptional work. The American Revolution is written by Jeffrey C. Ward, who wrote the Civil War and many other Burns documentaries, including the ones on Congress and Thomas Jefferson. And it's co directive did by Sarah Botstein and David Schmidt, both of whom have worked with Burns for years. But the American Revolution presents a challenge that even the Civil War did not. No photographs, period. To compensate, Burns and company use war reenactors and place them in the actual historical locations. On many, let's say most documentaries using a similar technique, the effect can be cheesy, but in the American Revolution, the directors avoid showing the faces of the actors reenacting battle movements. Instead, parts of their bodies are shown in intense close up. A bandaged hand here, a muddy boot there. Elsewhere. In an approach that borders on pure art, the directors use drones to capture the action from high, high above. It's unusual and beautiful. Battles are the surprisingly dominant ingredient of this six part series. The American Revolution goes into more detail about individual battles than I ever learned in my own American history classes. But new and vintage maps, clearly animated to show true positions and movements, make it all very clear and very vibrant. The actors quoting from the historical participants and the historians interviewed to comment on the action, do the rest. In their various war documentaries, Burns and his team always have focused as much on the ground troops as on the generals, often much more so telling their story from the bottom up rather than the top down. The American Revolution does both. We hear important observations from George Washington and Benjamin Franklin, but also from Native Americans, revolutionary women, enslaved people and others not always given voice in such narratives. In addition, the program's historians make us think differently about the history we're witnessing. In the colonies, those who were faithful to the Crown were called Loyalists and those against them called themselves patriots. This series humanizes both sides and also explains why some Native tribes, including the Shawnees, and sided with the British in hopes of protecting their own lands. The program even looks at old events in a new way, as when historian Maya Jasanoff reacts to the story of a loyalist who was dragged from his home by patriots and tarred and feathered.
- [46:14]
Antonia Hitchens
Tarring and feathering is something that has come down to us as an almost kind of comical thing because you see these people with chicken feathers on them, but this is hideous stuff. Boiling pitch is poured onto somebody's skin. The burns are unbelievable. And it's all part also of a kind of spectacle of violence. That is a really important part of this, and this is why the feathers are put on. It's that you are trying to humiliate and shame the victim.
- [46:53]
NPR Promo/Other Hosts
Peter Coyote, the actor who has narrated many Ken Burns documentaries, does so again here. He's got a great voice for it and leans into all the difficult place names and people's names with confident authority. At one point, I suspect he even has fun reading a particular passage. It comes in episode five, right after the awful winter at Valley Forge. General George Washington has decided he must train his remaining exhausted troops to a higher level. Over the course of this series, we learn many new things about familiar names like Nathan Hale, Paul Revere and Benedict Arnold. But the name Coyote mentions here was new to me.
- [47:36]
Antonia Hitchens
Washington wanted every man in his newly reorganized army to undergo formal military training to end what he called the confusion that had too often undercut its performance on the battlefield. The man he picked to oversee that task was a newcomer to America, Friedrich Wilhelm Ludolf, Gerhard Auguste Heinrich Ferdinand von Steuben.
- [48:03]
NPR Promo/Other Hosts
The sheer number of the battles and the details about them attest to how hard our ancestors fought for the notion of a federalist society. At the end, the American Revolution reminds us that the quest to maintain that society and to strive to achieve a more perfect union is far from over. I'll end the way the series does by citing Alexander Hamilton.
- [48:28]
Antonia Hitchens
Alexander Hamilton was concerned that an unprincipled man would mount the hobby horse of popularity and throw things into confusion. In a government like ours, he would write, no one is above the law.
- [48:46]
Terry Gross
David Biancooli reviewed the American Revolution, a new documentary series by Ken Burns, tomorrow on Fresh Air. My guest will be Ethan Hawke. He's starring in two new movies, Blue Moon, about lyricist Lorenz Hart, and the horror movie Black Phone 2 in the streaming series the Lowdown. He's a small time investigative journalist, constantly getting into trouble. We'll talk about his movies and his life from his years as a teenaged film star to today. I hope you'll join us to keep up with what's on the show and get highlights of our interviews. Follow us on Instagram PRFresh Air Fresh Air's executive producer is Danny Miller. Our technical director and engineer is Audrey Bentham. Our engineer today is Adam Stanischewski. Our managing producer is Sam Brigger. Our interviews and reviews are produced and edited by Phyllis Myers, Annemarie Boldonato, Lauren Krenzel, Teresa Madden, Monique Nazareth, Thea Chaloner, Susan Yakundi and Anna Bauman. Our digital media producer is Molly Sivi Nesper. Our consulting visual producer is Hope Wilson. Roberta Shorrock directs the show. Our co host is Tanya Moseley. I'm Terry Gross.
- [50:03]
Sponsor/Advertisement Voice
This message comes from Cachava. Sometimes people stock their fridge with good intentions only to have their future self sacrifice. Nutrition for convenience, Keep your body and mind nourished with whole body meal shakes from cachava. It's got 25 grams of protein, 6 grams of fiber, grains, and so much more, but it actually tastes delicious. Try one of Cachava's indulgent flavors today. Shop now through December 2nd. To get 30% off your first purchase of two or more bags, go to cachava.com and use code NPR.
- [50:39]
Antonia Hitchens
Latin music has never been bigger, but it's always been big on all Latino 15 years in, we continue celebrating Latinidad through a music lens, transcending borders through Ritmo. Get to know artists from La Cultura on a deeper level, and throw some new Latin music recs into your rotation. Listen to Alt Latino in NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.