
Hosted by Future of Jewish · EN

In today's "progressive" foreign-policy imagination, Iranian aggression is contextual, Israeli deterrence is provocative, and the Jewish state is always at fault.

Familiar cognitive shortcuts, social reinforcement, and emotional reasoning shape distorted beliefs about Jews and Israel — without always requiring malicious intent.

Modern antisemitism is not a misunderstanding to be clarified, but a movement to be confronted, exposed, and defeated.

Rachel Goldberg-Polin’s devastating memoir about her kidnapped and murdered son, Hersh, reveals what happens when grief no longer fits inside the structures meant to contain it.

Long before 1967, before so-called “occupation,” and before the modern Jewish state even existed, the movement behind this slogan had already made its objective clear.

American Jews are more vulnerable in our own country today than ever in our lifetime. And it’s not just the United States. The problem is global.

What if antisemitism survives not because it makes sense, but because it protects people from confronting themselves?

These past two years have taught me that the necessity for the IDF is ever-prevalent, but they have also reinforced something else.

Treating the Islamic Republic of Iran and its proxies like ordinary political actors blinds the West to the growing threat in front of us.

Somewhere along the way, "tikkun olam" stopped being a Jewish concept and started becoming a “progressive” yard sign with Hebrew seasoning.