
Loading summary
Bob Wilkin
The following is a listener supported ministry from the Grace Evangelical Society.
Announcer
Are we being arrogant if we reject the teachings of the early Church fathers? How could we in the 21st century have more theological knowledge than these men who were closer to the time of Jesus? Hello. Welcome to Grace and Focus. Let's talk about this topic today and we're delighted that you're joining us. Grace and Focus is a radio broadcast and podcast ministry of the Grace Evangelical Society. We come to you weekdays and our web address is faithalone.org there you can get information about our online free seminary, our in print free magazine also called Grace and Focus, and about our national annual conference coming up May 18th through the 21st. Make plans to join us. Get all the information you need@faithalone.org or it's going to be a great time. There are great accommodations. We meet at Camp Kopas, beautiful place in Denton, Texas. There's VBS for the kids. So right now is a great time to get registered all the information you need@faithalone.org now with today's question and answer discussion, here are Bob Wilkin and Ken Yates.
Bob Wilkin
Bob, we have a question from John and this is a question that comes up every now and then. People wonder about it, I guess, more than anything, even if they don't ask the question. But he refers to what he calls early Church Fathers. And now you and I talked about that. Technically, I think among scholars they make a distinction between the Apostolic Fathers and then the Church Fathers.
Ken Yates
Yeah. Now the word Apostolic fathers, apostolic means related to the apostles. So that the apostolic fathers, I believe the definition is people who either knew the apostles were discipled by the apostles or they had a close connection to the apostles. Like for example, they may not have been personally discipled by an apostle or even someone who was trained by the apostles, but they may be discipled by a second generation person who was in turn trained by one of the apostles. So maybe the apostles taught Clement of Rome and then Clement of Rome taught them. So they might say, okay, that's still an Apostolic Father. I think the Apostolic Fathers go from the late first century to the mid to late second century. And then I think Church Fathers includes that group, but goes all the way till about the late 4th or early 5th century. Like I think some people would call Augustine or Augustine, depending on how you pronounce it, a Church father.
Bob Wilkin
Even though he was 300 something years old?
Ken Yates
Yeah, like 430, I think. When he was what, he was the Bishop of Carthage, I think.
Bob Wilkin
Yeah, probably the one that I hear Most often as an Apostolic father was Polycarp. You often hear Polycarp was a disciple of John's and John who wrote the questioner. The questioner also puts Clement in there. He says that they were students and co workers. That's the first time I've heard that with John and the Apostle Paul.
Ken Yates
But doesn't he say something about arrogance, that it would be arrogant?
Bob Wilkin
Well, here's what he says, all right. These guys who lived so long ago and maybe even knew the apostles, a few of them, or even if they knew someone who knew them.
Ken Yates
Right.
Bob Wilkin
He says every single one of them, all the way through the 4th century like you said, or 5th century, denied the doctrine of once saved, always saved. And they also rejected predestination. Okay. None of them believed in predestination of the Calvinists. And so none of them believed in one saved, always saved. They all believed you could lose your salvation. And even they believed in baptismal regeneration. When you read their, their writings, you have to be baptized to go to heaven. I, I would say they also taught from my limited reading that you had to take the Lord's Supper, you had to take the Lord's Supper to, to make it into the kingdom, or if you didn't take the Lord's Supper on a regular basis, you would lose your salvation. Okay, here's his question. Are we really, really arrogant to presume that we who've come all these years later have more theological knowledge than these guys did? That's the question. And wouldn't it be more rational to question what we believe if we don't agree with what these guys taught?
Ken Yates
Yeah. So good question. And so here would be my answer. Would it have been arrog for someone to question what the first century Judaizers were saying to the churches in galatia? These were first century people. They weren't second century, third century, fourth century. These were around 50 A.D. so within 17 years of Jesus resurrection and they're teaching what Paul calls a false gospel. Would it be arrogant to reject what they said or stupid to accept what they said?
Bob Wilkin
I think it'd be biblical to reject it.
Ken Yates
Right, right, right. The would be true of any people who contradict scripture. So the question is not when how early the Apostolic Fathers or church Fathers wrote. The question is, is what they wrote accurate? The very fact that they denied the security of the believer shows they lost the concept of John 3. 16. Thomas F. Torrance is a church historian and, and he wrote a book called the Doctrine of Grace in the Apostolic Fathers. And he said to A man. They lost the concept of grace. Let me tell you. I did my dissertation on repentance as a condition for salvation in the New Testament, and part of that was a study of repentance in church history. And here's what I found. Did you know, Ken, that at the very beginning, after the apostles left the scene, that the proto Catholic Church, because there really wasn't a Catholic Church until around the 5th century, but the early versions of the Catholic Church, where they
Bob Wilkin
developed bishops and things.
Ken Yates
So they said, there's no repentance after you've been baptized. Your baptism covers all your pre baptismal sins. And if you commit a mortal sin after your baptism, you're going to hell.
Bob Wilkin
Right. One time, right.
Ken Yates
So what do you think people did?
Bob Wilkin
Well, I know exactly what they did. They do what I would do. I would wait until I got old and, okay, I'm on my deathbed now, then I'm going to repent and now baptize me. Right.
Ken Yates
So they weren't baptized until their deathbed. Right. Okay, so what did the Apostolic Fathers do? Well, they said, this isn't a good idea.
Announcer
It's coming. It'll be here before you know it. What am I talking about? The Grace Evangelical Society's National Conference 2026, May 18th through the 21st at Camp Kopas, an absolutely beautiful campground in North Texas, right on the lake with lots of recreation, great food, a great place to stay, wonderful fellowship and wonderful free Grace Bible teaching. Information and online registration now@faithalone.org events. First timers waive registration fees. Faithalone.org
Ken Yates
so then what they did is they said you can have one repentance. So you get initial forgiveness of all your pre baptismal sins. And now you start the Christian life with a clean slate. But if you commit a mortal sin after that, you're going to hell unless you repent. But you only get one time to repent. So guess what they did? They waited till their deathbeds to repent. So then guess what the Apostolic Fathers did. They said, this doesn't make sense. So we're going to allow multiple repentance. There's no limit on it, but the priests are going to give them very strict guidelines on what they need to do before they can come back to communion. Because according to Catholicism, if you can't take last rites, if you can't have communion, you're going to hell. Right.
Bob Wilkin
Think of the power they had.
Ken Yates
Oh, yeah.
Bob Wilkin
And that's what the issue is.
Ken Yates
So guess what? That's where they developed the mourner's Bench. People would come to church, they would come to Mass, and they weren't allowed to partake of the elements. And so they had to sit there and mourn. And typically it was six months to a year or a year and a half. And then after that, the priest would say, okay, you've done enough penance. Well, eventually, guess what happened. Eventually it got to the point where penances say so many Hail Marys and you're good to go. In fact, during the time of Luther, they were selling indulgences by around the 15, early 1500s, you could pay money in advance to have an affair. You could say, okay, I'll pay this much money and I get forgiveness in advance. Right, right. And that drove Luther nuts and led Luther to ultimately question what the Catholic Church was saying. So my point in all this is this. The fact that the Church fathers were early doesn't mean they were accurate. I spoke at a brown bag at Dallas seminary around 20 years ago. I think it was 2005 or 2006. And I was talking about the fact that if we simply believe we have eternal life apart from perseverance, apart from us proving anything, this young man came up afterwards and said, you know, what you said today contradicts 500 years of Christian scholarship.
Bob Wilkin
There you go. Yeah.
Ken Yates
And you know my response to him? I said, why do you say that? Are you talking about Calvinism? And he said, yeah, the Reformation, Calvinism. And I said, but isn't there 2000 years of Christian scholarship? Shouldn't you be Roman Catholic? If you want to follow the majority of Christian scholarship, you're in some little minor tributary. If you're a Calvinist, you should be a Roman Catholic or Eastern Orthodox, one or the other, because they're the ones that go back 2000 years. So if it's arrogant to question what the Church Fathers and. And the Apostolic Father said, well, then John should be Roman Catholic or Eastern Orthodox.
Bob Wilkin
And he might be saying that. And there's an implied message in this question here. I'm not saying John is doing it, but when people ask the question, let's take Polycarp, this is an example, and let's assume that Polycarp heard. Because you hear this. Polycarp heard John the Apostle speak.
Ken Yates
Right?
Bob Wilkin
Okay, let's assume that's true. The implied message is, well, then what he says is true, or what Polycarp says is the same thing John said, but that's not true. How many examples do we know of people who were a student of someone who doesn't teach what they taught.
Ken Yates
Didn't John even say that in first John 2:19 they went out from us because they were not of us.
Bob Wilkin
Right.
Ken Yates
He's talking about people who came into the Jerusalem Church, supposedly believers, and yet they left because they didn't agree with the doctrine of the Jerusalem Church. And the issue is not whether they were born again or not, although I think it's likely they were not born again. The issue was their doctrine didn't match up with the doctrine of the Jerusalem Church. And this was in the first century. Right.
Bob Wilkin
And so if Polycarp heard the Apostle John teach, that doesn't prove anything. Thirty years later, he could be teaching something different.
Ken Yates
When I was in the doctoral program at Dallas, we had to read some of the writings of the Church fathers.
Bob Wilkin
Did you have to do that? Yes, I did.
Ken Yates
I don't know about you, but I found them appalling.
Bob Wilkin
Oh, I did too, man. You had to jump through so many hoops. You had to do this if you sinned before you could take communion. On and on. And they had so many requirements.
Ken Yates
So if you're concerned about what John's talking about, try reading some of these people.
Bob Wilkin
They're in English. You can get them in English, but
Ken Yates
they don't read at all like scripture. They read like something which is heresy. And even the Orthodox and Catholic Churches have abandoned some of the teachings. For example, the Council of Trent anathematized anyone who taught justification by faith alone. Well, the Catholic Church doesn't do that anymore. They want to call Protestants their brethren.
Bob Wilkin
How old something is does not determine the truth of it. The truth of it is, does it agree with Scripture?
Ken Yates
If it did, John, then I'd be telling the truth because I'm old.
Bob Wilkin
Well, thanks for the question, John. And until next time, keep grace in focus.
Announcer
Be sure to check out our daily blogs@faithalone.org they are short and full of great teaching, just like what you've heard today. Find them@faithalone.org resources blog. We would like to thank all of our financial partners who help us keep this show going. All gifts are tax deductible and very much appreciated. If you'd like to find out how you can be a financial partner, Visit us@faithalone.org on our next episode. What about Ray Comfort's example in evangelism? Come back and join us. And until then, let's keep grace in focus.
Bob Wilkin
The proceeding has been a listener supported ministry from the Grace Evangelical Society.
Episode: Are We Arrogant to Reject the Teachings of the Early Church Fathers?
Host: Bob Wilkin (with Ken Yates)
Date: March 11, 2026
Length: 13 minutes
This episode tackles a foundational question often posed to proponents of Free Grace Theology: Is it arrogant for modern Christians to reject the theological views of the early Church Fathers, who were closer to the apostles in time and relationship? Bob Wilkin and Ken Yates discuss the historical context of the Church Fathers' teachings, their divergence from New Testament doctrine, the evolution of early Christian beliefs about salvation, and whether “age” or proximity guarantees doctrinal accuracy.
| Segment Topic | Time | |------------------------------------------- |-----------| | Distinguishing Apostolic vs. Church Fathers| 01:19–02:51| | Early Fathers’ Teachings Summarized | 03:31 | | Scriptural Authority vs. Early Tradition | 05:17–05:21| | Historical Development of Repentance | 06:42–08:31| | Majority Tradition Challenged | 09:57–09:58| | Alleged Polycarp “Lineage” and Accuracy | 10:54–11:54| | Reaction to Reading the Fathers | 12:00–12:14| | Authority Determined by Truth, Not Age | 12:42–12:48|
Final Word:
[12:42] Bob Wilkin: “How old something is does not determine the truth of it. The truth of it is, does it agree with Scripture?”