Why “Kill The Bad Guys” Never Works - with MS NOW’s Ayman Mohyeldin

Summary

Podcast Summary: "Why 'Kill The Bad Guys' Never Works"

Podcast: Hasan Minhaj Doesn't Know
Host: Hasan Minhaj (misattributed as Hasan Piker—note for summary: host is Hasan Minhaj)
Guest: Ayman Mohyeldin (MS NOW, former NBC & Al Jazeera war correspondent)
Date: June 3, 2026

---

Episode Overview

This episode dives into why the popular Western and particularly American impulse to “kill the bad guys”—as a shortcut to solving geopolitical issues—continues to fail. Through sharp humor and in-depth personal stories, Hasan Minhaj and guest Ayman Mohyeldin explore the limits of militaristic “solutions” to complex Middle Eastern conflicts, reflect on US media’s complicity, and discuss what real journalistic integrity and empathy mean during war. The conversation is packed with first-hand accounts from years of frontline reporting and thoughtful analysis that questions our easy narratives.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. The “Kill the Bad Guys” Narrative and Its Shortcomings

• Ayman Mohyeldin explains that the idea of eliminating violent leaders as a path to stability has repeatedly failed in both policy and practice:
  • Quote: “The idea that you're just going to kill your way through a leadership and expect that to change the fundamental problems of any society has proven time and time again it has not worked.” (03:21)
• Real change requires deeper engagement and understanding, not assassinations or military brute force. Removing leaders simply makes way for others without addressing root issues.

2. US Media’s Role in Shaping (and Failing) Public Opinion

• Post-9/11, American media lost its objectivity and patriotism often bled into advocacy for war.
  • Quote: “After 9/11, we launched a massive investigation into the 9/11 hijackers... I was one of the few people... who spoke Arabic... plucked off being a desk assistant... to start working on these very complex stories.” (06:22)
• Media organizations helped sell the Iraq War, routinely failing to hold power accountable. No meaningful reckoning or accountability has happened since.
  • Quote: “...Administration officials that lied to the American public and led us into this costly war got away with it. Nobody was ever held accountable.” (11:40)

3. The Absurdity and Dehumanization of Gamifying War

• The US military’s use of “most wanted” playing cards and “wanted” posters is criticized as a way to gamify and oversimplify war for both soldiers and the public.
  • Quote: “There's an element of gamification of war... If you can reduce them to playing cards, if you can strip away who these people are... it becomes easier to accept killing them...” (31:18)
• This approach encourages dehumanization and false solutions—“just kill the bad guys and the problem is solved”—with tragic results.

4. On-the-Ground Reality: Human Costs and Failed Interventions

• Ayman recounts the devastation he saw firsthand in Gaza and Iraq—innocent lives lost, destroyed families, entire cultures set back.
  • Quote: “You witness so much suffering. ...at one point...a mother who had infertility problems... her kids were killed as a result of an Israeli strike... it was just unbelievably heartbreaking.” (39:03)
• The cascading consequences of US interventions (Iraq, Syria, the broader Middle East) include civil war, terrorism spillover, generations of refugees, and destabilized societies.
  • Quote: “We decimated a state, we destroyed its institutions... That bred a generation of terrorists that went on to attack Europe and the United States as a result of ISIS.” (33:53)

5. Media Double Standards and Lack of Empathy

• US journalists often lack solidarity or empathy for colleagues in war zones, especially Palestinian reporters who risk and often lose their lives.
  • Quote: “...There are reasons to that structural distance... I don't think that they necessarily see Palestinian journalists like themselves… It’s very disappointing.” (47:11)
• American and European journalists sometimes justify or minimize violence against Palestinian journalists and media workers:
  • Quote: “There are journalists in the US... who have made cases as to why Palestinian journalists are not real journalists... That basically serves as a justification for the use of violence against Palestinian journalists.” (48:20)

6. The Hope and Limitations of Revolutionary Change

• Ayman, as an Egyptian-American, recalls the 2011 Tahrir Square revolution with emotion and hope, then reflects on its aftermath and the region’s drift back toward authoritarianism.
  • Quote: “It was probably the only time, I think I cried on tv.... There was this sense of euphoria that the country was going to transform.” (52:27)
• There’s now a wariness of instability, a desire for gradual “evolution not revolution,” and a political class that uses the aftermaths of failed uprisings as excuses for repression.

7. The Urgent Need for Alternative Approaches

• The media and public must challenge the default impulse toward military solutions. Ayman argues for more diplomacy, conversation, and the capacity to imagine adversaries as people with agency and grievances, not cartoon villains.
  • Quote: “We just need to shift our mindset from constantly trying to solve our problems militarily. That is like a fundamental problem in America... Our quick instinct is to say, how do we sanction them? ...How do we bomb them? And I just think that is such a destructive worldview to have.” (59:56)
• Historic breakthroughs have happened via engagement, not war.
  • Quote: “Diplomacy is the reason why we did not go to war with Russia, nuclear war... It was being able to engage with them and disagreeing... that allowed us to ultimately break through.” (61:51)

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On US media’s war cheerleading:
  “How much ‘suck on this’ energy was in the newsroom at that time?” — Hasan Minhaj (11:20)
• On the callous metaphors used by pundits:
  “Is it offensive that he’s co-signing a war that we didn’t have to be a part of? Sure. But I am more offended at his abuse of the English language.” — Hasan Minhaj (10:19)
• On why simply killing leaders doesn’t work:
  “Sadly, the problem hasn’t been solved. You’ve killed leaders, and leaders are interchangeable.” — Ayman Mohyeldin (32:51)
• On solidarity among journalists:
  “I think the community of journalists, irrespective of where you are in this world, should be very united... should not engage in... try[ing] to vilify other journalists and justify their targeting and killing, which I find extremely disturbing.” — Ayman Mohyeldin (47:11)
• On why hope persists:
  “I remain very optimistic. I remain very hopeful in human potential. I believe that humans, you know, yearn to be free.” — Ayman Mohyeldin (57:19)

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• 01:56 — Wanted posters, “dead or alive” in Saddam’s hometown
• 03:21 — Why “kill the bad guys” never works: fundamental limits of assassination as policy
• 08:14 — Thomas Friedman’s “suck on this” moment, media narrative for Iraq invasion
• 13:21 — Bill Moyers’ “Buying the War,” White House press corps performance
• 22:35 — The motivations and reality of war reporting; Ayman’s personal journey
• 31:09 — Iraqi Most Wanted Playing Cards: gamification of war & propagandizing violence
• 33:53 — Lasting damage in Iraq post-invasion
• 38:05 — Living in Gaza: war and personal transformation
• 40:24 — The 2014 Gaza beach strike: reporting, editorial suppression, and personal cost
• 47:06 — Lack of solidarity for Palestinian journalists
• 52:27 — Tahrir Square 2011: hope and heartbreak of revolution
• 57:19 — Optimism for future change
• 59:56 — The need for a new frame: talking, not killing, to resolve conflicts

---

Tone, Style, and Takeaways

Hasan Minhaj infuses the episode with quick-witted, dark humor, persistent curiosity, and empathy. Ayman Mohyeldin offers depth, hard-won perspective, and careful clarity grounded in experience. Both challenge easy narratives and refuse either journalistic detachment or hollow patriotism. The conversation is informed, irreverent, and honest about the tragic cycles that media and policy too often reinforce.

Major Takeaway:
“Killing the bad guys” isn’t just a failed foreign policy—it’s a failure of imagination, empathy, and responsibility, both in journalism and American self-understanding. Real progress requires accountability, more courageous journalism, and the willingness to see “the enemy” as human beings beyond the deck of cards.

---

End of Summary

Transcript

[Eamon Mohideen]

Lemonade.

[Hasan Piker]

Last week, Chinese President Xi Jinping allegedly told Donald Trump that Putin might regret invading Ukraine. Now other outlets are reporting that President Xi Jinping denies this conversation completely. With over 1 million casualties for Russia and counting, I would be regretting it now. I read about this meeting on Ground News, which is today's sponsor of hmdk. Ground News is a platform that has helped our team be responsible consumers of the news. It shows a breakdown of all the publications reporting on a certain story, including the typical factuality of each publication in which way they tend to lean politically. We can't eliminate bias. We all have them, right? But we can factor it in as we analyze an event or an issue. Take it from me, if we talk about my personal bias, I am always going to be questioning the veracity of a Donald Trump claim. But I have to withhold judgment for now, based off the publication's reporting, no one is sure what actually was discussed between these two men, but if I had to guess, it was probably the Sheen influencer trip. Never forget. Let's cut through the noise together. Go to groundnews.comhussin to subscribe and get 40% off the unlimited access Vantage plan, the same one that we use right here at HMDK. Go to groundnews.com Hasan today. Summer it's when we share more time, more memories and more photos. And at ATT, the iPhone 17 Pro is your summer essential. It's center stage, front camera, auto adjusts the frame to fit everyone into group selfies. You don't even have to turn your phone. And AT&T makes sharing those pics with everyone easy. Right now at ATT, ask how you can get an iPhone 17 Pro on them with eligible iPhone. Trade in any condition Requires trade in of iPhone 15+ or higher. Excludes iPhone 16e and 17e requires eligible plan. Terms and restrictions apply, subject to change. Visit att.com iPhone or visit@ ATT store for details.

[Eamon Mohideen]

The American military actually spent a lot of time going around Saddam Hussein's old hometown and putting up wanted dead or alive posters.

[Hasan Piker]

Whoa.

[Eamon Mohideen]

In Iraq. And it says wanted dead or alive. $25 million reward. Call us with any information that can lead to his arrest.

[Hasan Piker]

And then there's a tip line right there. You can email them.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Yeah. Tips at orha Centcom Mil.

[Hasan Piker]

Got it.

[Eamon Mohideen]

So people in Tikrit who barely had any food or water, electricity were encouraged

[Hasan Piker]

to open up their Yahoo email account

[Eamon Mohideen]

and email me and drop a tip to Centcom. Exactly.

[Hasan Piker]

Look, a lot of news anchors aren't real journalists they're just actors who play journalists on tv. Amin Mohideen is not one of those anchors. He has spent years working as a war reporter literally on the ground. He's basically the Forrest Gump of recent Middle Eastern history popping up in Iraq, Gaza, Lebanon, Egypt and Ukraine. And in more recent years he has been bringing that experience from the field to the studio at Ms. Now with a perspective that sees people in the Middle east as, you know, actual human beings and not just foreign policy issues. So I sat down with Eamon to talk about how America and American media tries to make sense of the Middle East. We really get into the just kill the bad guys narrative and, and why it keeps failing.

[Eamon Mohideen]

The idea that you're just going to kill your way through a leadership and expect that to change the fundamental problems of any society has proven time and time again has not worked.

[Hasan Piker]

Why? Coverage of the Israeli Palestinian conflict has often been lopsided and not great.

[Eamon Mohideen]

I think there are so many layers to covering the Israeli Palestinian conflict that make it difficult for American journalists and empathy and sympathy are probably two of them.

[Hasan Piker]

And we look back at when the US media lost its fricking mind between 911 and the invasion of Iraq. Especially, especially New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman. Well, suck on this. Why are you laughing? Hey, if you think that's an offensive metaphor for a three time Pulitzer Prize winner, wait until you see what Thomas does with a bubble. Hurry right away.

[Eamon Mohideen]

No delays doctor. Make your daddy glad you have had such a laugh.

[Hasan Piker]

Conspiracy theories are flying about the shooting at the White House Correspondents Dinner. An overwhelming amount of Americans online believe that the shooting was staged, fabricated to increase President Trump's approval ratings. Now I read about this response on Ground News, which is today's sponsor. Ground News is an independent news platform that shows a breakdown of publications reporting on a story, including which way each publisher tends to lean politically. It's not about eliminating bias completely, but it makes you aware of the potential biases of different publications so you can consider them as you analyze an event or an issue. In one of the articles, Donald Trump maintained that the shooting was real and the Epstein files were quote, a Democrat hoax and are a criminal conspiracy designed to damage him. Right. This is one of the first times when I did not pick up on many differences in a story that could be attributed to political leanings. The right leaning publications are saying the same thing as the left. Shit is weird. Let's cut through the noise together. Go to groundnews.com hussen to subscribe and get the 40% off unlimited access vantage plan, which breaks down to just five bucks a month with my discount. That's groundnews.com SL Huss. Just to kick things off, I want to say thank you for your service. You have been doing incredible, important work as a journalist for over 25 years now. And I just want to personally thank you for that.

[Eamon Mohideen]

My pleasure.

[Hasan Piker]

But I also want to thank you for some of your best work, which came out recently. And I'm talking about your full frontal GQ spread. Let's take a look. Eamon. Tom Brokaw could never listen.

[Eamon Mohideen]

The. The good thing I was going to tell you is very few people noticed that because my wife was standing next to me and I think most of the attention was on.

[Hasan Piker]

Yeah, all eyes were on her.

[Eamon Mohideen]

All eyes are on her, obviously.

[Hasan Piker]

Amen. Another humble brag. He's married to a supermodel. He's over six feet tall. He's married to a supermodel. Life is good, Lig.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Alhamdulillah.

[Hasan Piker]

There we go. That's what we say in Islam in interviews I've heard. Is it true that you started your career as a journalist the moment Bush was inaugurated in January 2000? Is this true?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Literally, the first day I walked into a newsroom as a desk assistant was George Bush's inauguration in 2001. January 20, 2001.

[Hasan Piker]

What was the newsroom like for you?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Well, interestingly enough, the summer before 911 was a very what I would call journalistically boring summer. And I wasn't sure that I actually wanted to stay in journalism. It was, you know, shark attacks off of the coast of Florida and Carolina. They were not big international stories. I had this kind of like, idea of wanting to be an international correspondent, and I wasn't sure how I was going to get there. Okay, so at some point I was kind of like, not really sure that journalism was for me, even though I've always wanted to be a journalism. But that kind of gave me a moment of pause. And then unfortunately, 911 happened, and the newsroom was not very diverse. In fact, one of the main reasons that I was able to kind of leapfrog some of my peers at the time was because I was the only one who spoke Arabic in the newsroom. And, you know, after 9 11, we launched a massive investigation into the 911 hijackers. And trying to understand what happened, what was the intelligence saying? And so I was one of the few people in the entire news organization, let alone in the newsroom who spoke Arabic and was kind of plucked off of being a desk assistant. Which is an entry level job and put into the investigative unit to start working on these, like, very complex, deep stories into 9 11. And in fact, when the war started in Afghanistan, that's how I got sent overseas on my first assignment and started becoming a bit of a field producer.

[Hasan Piker]

911 happens. I'm in high school. The war on terror happens. As I'm in high school, entering college, even into post college, I'm consuming the news media. So me, my family, this is pre WhatsApp. We're consuming the news media. I want to play two clips for you of the things that we were consuming at that time. The first is from Thomas Friedman a few months after the Iraq invasion in 2003. It was explaining why the invasion of Iraq was necessary. Let's take a look. We needed to go over there basically and take out a very big stick right in the heart of that world and burst that bubble. And there was only one way to

[Eamon Mohideen]

do it, because part of that bubble

[Hasan Piker]

said, we've got you. This bubble is actually going to level the balance of power between us and you. Because we don't care about life. We're ready to sacrifice, and all you care about are your stock options and your hummers.

[Eamon Mohideen]

And what they needed to see was

[Hasan Piker]

American boys and girls going house to house from Basra to Baghdad and basically saying, which part of this sentence don't you understand? You don't think we care about our open society? You think this bubble fantasy, we're just

[Eamon Mohideen]

going to let it grow?

[Hasan Piker]

Well, suck on this. Why are you laughing? Hey, he's on Charlie Rose and he thinks he's cooking. What are you laughing at?

[Eamon Mohideen]

I mean, I don't even know where to begin with that.

[Hasan Piker]

Start.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Look, it's a. It's a completely arrogant worldview. Um, it's a oversimplification of what was happening in an understanding of the region. It's a language that is deeply embedded in violence and the psychology of violence and the belief that only violence is the way to communicate with other people. And it's the language of dominance, which is regardless of what we are about to do to you, you have to accept what it is that we are here to do to you. As he just said, we are coming to you from Basra to Baghdad. And you're going to have to suck on this because we're about to light it up for you. And this notion that we won't protect ourselves by destroying your society is the framework in which he's kind of like presenting this argument. He's like, we are Prepared to send our boys and girls to die to protect this worldview that we have, this idea that we have. And I think it's just a grotesque use of language and oversimplification of what has actually been happening in the Middle East.

[Hasan Piker]

I'm really glad you're saying that because, look, is it offensive that he's co signing a war that we didn't have to be a part of? Sure. But I am more offended at his abuse of the English language. Let's just take a quick look at this, okay? This is a quote of what he was saying on Charlie Rose. We needed to go over there basically, and take out a very big stick. Okay? So that's the first metaphor, okay? Right in the heart of that world. Second metaphor in burst that bubble. Third metaphor, same sentence. Now it's getting stranger, okay? Because part of that bubble said, so now the bubble has two parts. Amen. Are you following this? The bubble has two. Apparently these bubbles can split. Okay? Part of that bubble said. And the bubble can talk. We've got you. The bubble is actually going to level the balance of power. So now the bubble is on a scale between us and you. Now, Eamon, from what I understand, Thomas Friedman is a writer, is that correct?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Yes. A Pulitzer Prize winner.

[Hasan Piker]

This is. He's won the Pulitzer Prize.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Yeah. I mean, for writing. For writing. I don't know for this specific piece, but he definitely won it. For writing. Yeah.

[Hasan Piker]

I mean, let me just say this, and I don't want to be bigoted here. I don't want to channel some of the energy that he brought to Charlie Rose, but goddamn, this is America. Learn the fucking language. Let me ask you this. You were in the newsroom in 2003 during this time, and in all seriousness, how much suck on this energy was in the newsroom at that time?

[Eamon Mohideen]

That's a really good question. Look, you know, 911 was a traumatic moment for this country. And so I think a lot of news organizations, a lot of journalists saw themselves, first and foremost Americans, and that America had just been attacked. And so it was in a moment of vulnerability. I don't agree with it. But in a moment of vulnerability that I think a lot of news organizations felt the responsibility to be patriotic. And you can debate what that means, to be patriotic in an environment of war, because that's a question that we deal with in this society all of the time. Are you allowed to criticize people in power? Should you be criticizing people in power? But I do think that there was a line that was crossed. Right. I think when you started seeing, like, American flag logos that were popping up, I think in the language that was used this type of argument for the sake of going to war. All of those things I think really raised very important questions as to whether or not the media was at the time objectively looking at what was about to happen in the Middle east and say, this is good or this is bad, or simply go along with whatever the administration was gonna put forth. And as we saw, unfortunately, not just in Afghanistan, but two years later in the lead up to the Iraq war, when the Bush administration was went out to make the case that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, was somehow connected to 9 11, the media unfortunately failed miserably in holding powerful officials accountable. And as a result of that, administration officials that lied to the American public and led us into this costly war got away with it. Nobody was ever held accountable for the lies that were, you know, that were pushed out.

[Hasan Piker]

Let's take a look at that in further detail. So the second clip that I wanted to show you, it's funny that you're saying this. This actually comes from the Bill Moyers documentary, Buying the War. Okay, so the clip that we're about to. I'd love your understanding of this as again, someone who has not only covered the war in Iraq, the war in Afghanistan, but also many of your colleagues worked in the White House press office or covered the White House at the time. So this is from the Bill Moyers doc, Buying the war. This is March 6, 2003, two weeks before the invasion of Iraq, two weeks

[Eamon Mohideen]

before he will order America to war. President Bush calls a press conference to make the case for disarming Saddam Hussein. At least a dozen times during this press conference, he will invoke 911 and Al Qaeda to justify a preemptive attack on a country that has not attacked America. Mr. President, if you decide. But the White House press corps will ask no hard questions tonight about those claims. Listen to what the President says. This is a scripted. Thank you, Mr. President. Scripted. Sure enough, the President's staff has given him a list of reporters to call on. Let's see here. Elizabeth Gregory. April,

[Hasan Piker]

did you have a question or

[Eamon Mohideen]

did I call upon you cold? I have a question. Okay.

[Hasan Piker]

I'm sure you do have a question.

[Eamon Mohideen]

He sort of giggled and laughed, and the reporters sort of laughed. I don't know if it was out of embarrassment for him or embarrassment for them because they still continue to play along after his questioning was done. They all shot up their hands and pretended they had a chance of being called on.

[Hasan Piker]

Mr. President, how is your faith guiding you? My faith sustains me because I pray daily.

[Eamon Mohideen]

I pray for guidance.

[Hasan Piker]

So what in the North Korea is going on right now? I mean, the way they all raised their hands in unison at the same time. Take me through what we just watched here in this Bill Moyers documentary.

[Eamon Mohideen]

So I think it's important to kind of separate two things, right? One is the process and the decorum. And I think that generally speaking, you know, the institution of the White House tries to maintain these types of national press conferences in a bit of a decorum so they don't descend into shouting matches. Right. And maybe we expect that to be a little bit more robust, but in a situation like that, nationally televised, you're trying to kind of bring a little bit decorum. So I don't think that necessarily having. And I'm pretty sure the idea of questions being submitted to the White House is a nonstarter. You know, it normally doesn't work like that. Usually what happens is there are reporters, they say they want to ask questions. And so to keep the process and the flow at a baseline level of respect, where everyone gets a chance to ask a question, he'll call on people. And there's also a little bit of seniority there. There are people who've been covering the White House for many years. They represent national organizations, they represent agencies. And so I think there's a little bit of a decorum to the process. But the second part of that, which is the question, what do you want your White House correspondents and White House reporters to ask the president, United States? Are you trying to humanize him? Are you trying to get into his psyche? Or are you trying to understand the power and the responsibility that he has to the American people and what he's about to embark on?

[Hasan Piker]

And so are you basically saying that asking him about his faith is probably the wrong thing to do at this point before they invade?

[Eamon Mohideen]

I think that would be the wrong place to do that type of interview. If I was running a profile about. And I think understanding the psychology of a president is important. I think if you're about to interview the president or do a press conference in which the national media is watching a. I don't care about his, you know, personal psychology. I care about his responsibility to the American people. Having said that, if I was a. If I was a reporter who writes for Life magazine or Lifestyle magazine and I wanted to do a profile, yeah, I would ask him about his faith, and I would ask him, is there, you know, Is there tension between his faith and the legality of the war that he's going to do? I mean, there's all kinds of questions that you can ask about it. Yeah, that's not the venue that I would have used to ask that question.

[Hasan Piker]

Well, you know what's crazy is some of those faces I recognize from when I did the White House correspondence. So they're pretty prominent journalists.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Very much. Very much.

[Hasan Piker]

You know, for me, that type of question that was asked on March 6, 2003, that's the equivalent of the 2026, hey, George W. Bush, what is your get ready with me in the morning? That's the GRWM of questions, by the way, when you're about to invade Iraq. I mean, it's kind of insane.

[Eamon Mohideen]

That's what I mean.

[Hasan Piker]

Am I crazy for thinking that?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Absolutely not. Absolutely not.

[Hasan Piker]

Now, do you think it's weird that people who push for the Iraq war like Thomas Friedman, Bill Kristol and David Frum not only still have a platform, but they're widely respected by Democrats?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Yes. They should not be. They should not be. Because I think when you get so many things wrong and you make a case for war that is based on lies and grounded in effectively illegal action, there should be accountability. There should be accountability. You should not be promoted and elevated and given a bigger and wider platform.

[Hasan Piker]

When I watch footage like this, it feels very similar to what's happening with the Trump administration now. So when there's pearl clutching in regards to Orange man, bad Orange man is violating norms when it comes to coverage of the White House, is that particularly new or has it been happening for a long time?

[Eamon Mohideen]

It has been happening for a long time, but I think it is happening differently now. It is happening in a much more intense way. The administration has figured out that it can. This administration has figured out that it can manipulate journalists in a much more effective way. So, you know, you take, for example, what is happening at the Pentagon. The Pentagon wants favorable coverage of its actions in the war. So what do they do? They make sure that journalists are willing to kind of sign agreements or rules that they have to comply with in terms of the coverage. You look at what's happened at the White House, we've gotten rid of a lot of journalists. The White House wants sycophants, basically. So they've brought in all these influencers and far right bloggers and, you know, all kinds of, like social media personalities. And when you watch the types of questions that they're asking, it's just basically, you know, either MAGA Talking points or cult like worship of Donald Trump? How do you sleep at night? You know, how do you do it? You're such an amazing guy. Why do the Democrats not like you?

[Hasan Piker]

Or the UFC fight? Where's the fight going to be?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Exactly. Where the, where's the fight going to be?

[Hasan Piker]

What part of the lawn is going to be on?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Exactly. And so when you, when you have this kind of like, breakdown of the responsibility and the roles of journalists in these very important positions, whether it was in 2003 or whether it's in 2026, it's the same through line. The tactics are different and the manipulation is different. But sadly, it's the same type of behavior. And it probably predates television, probably predates broadcast. Probably 100 years ago when it was just print or radio, there was probably some relationship between people in power and journalists in which access was traded for favorable questions or favorable coverage. And the, and the kind of revolving door that exists sometimes between power and media is, you know, deeply problematic.

[Hasan Piker]

As someone who obviously has not been doing this 25 plus years, but I'm sure you had older advisors and mentors, what are the counterweights to combat this type of quid pro quo journalistic coverage?

[Eamon Mohideen]

I mean, I think that one of the most important pieces of advice that I was always given when I was coming up into a newsroom and I started out as a producer, so I worked with a lot of established journalists, was what are you in the service of? What are you doing this for? Who are the people that your journalism is meant to service? Right. And I think when you constantly keep that question as your North Star, you become less intimidated by people in power. You care less about whether you have access or not. You care less about the prestige of the position and what you want to compromise in order to have that prestige. And, and there's no doubt that media has a lot of, you know, prestige to it in this country, certainly.

[Hasan Piker]

Yeah.

[Eamon Mohideen]

So I think when you, when you have a very clear North Star of what it is that you are in service of, I think it helps you guide, guide you through the pitfalls of some of the things that we sometimes criticize the media for. And I want to be clear, I mean, you know, the media is a very big institution in this country and is very diverse. And, you know, there's no doubt that you can cherry pick a few examples and highlight some of the structural problems that exist in the media. But by far and large, the work that is done on a local level, on a national level, on an international level, by reporters is tremendous. And we wouldn't have a healthy, functioning society if we didn't have the media institutions that we have right now. I mean, they need to be better, but we also wouldn't be where we are if we didn't have what we have.

[Hasan Piker]

No, no. And it. And it sounds like what has motivated you is you're operating from a place of moral clarity.

[Eamon Mohideen]

I try to. I try to. I mean, I try to have a North Star that the career that I've been blessed to have has been in service of trying to foster a better understanding between a part of the world that America is heavily invested in and a part of the world that it sadly does not understand. And a lot of that is by luck. I'm from a part of the world. I grew up with one foot in each part of the world. So I was able to kind of bridge that divide between, you know, newsrooms that wanted to understand the Middle east and a Middle east that was being sadly misunderstood into America.

[Hasan Piker]

Can I talk to you about the war reporting that you've done?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Yeah.

[Hasan Piker]

Okay. So from my understanding, there's two types of war reporters that I've seen. First, you have the people who want to shine a light on the devastation of war and the lives that it affects around the world, perhaps showing that we're all human beings and our humanity is what unites us all. Then there's a second type of war reporter, which is a person who wants to wear a flak jacket and is really into Call of Duty. Does this track with your experience that it's usually that type of dichotomy?

[Eamon Mohideen]

It's not that. It's not that clear of a dichotomy. I mean, I think journalists. Look, again, there's a difference between broadcast journalists. Broadcast journalists are their own unique species. Right. Because the TVs on them and your cameras are on them. So there is an element of performance for tv. So let's be very honest about that. Yeah, yeah.

[Hasan Piker]

You were nasted thirst trap like this when you were a war correspondent. Not at all. You had to be buttoned up. Literally and metaphorically.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Literally and metaphorically. I was also in places where you cannot be walking around like that.

[Hasan Piker]

Right.

[Eamon Mohideen]

You know, so the short answer to your question is there is an element, unfortunately, of television that you are capturing something on tv, and so you want to capture it in a. I don't know what the right word for it is, but in a compelling way. And sometimes that people get carried away with what they. What they do. It can be a little Bit theatrical. But I do think for the most part, journalists who risk their lives to go into war zones do it with a good sense of purpose and understanding that they are risk literally risking their lives to, to try to shine a light on a part of the world in which people are suffering and oftentimes people are dying.

[Hasan Piker]

I want to talk about that window in your life. From 2003 to 2015, you were reporting from Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Ukraine and Gaza. Now look, I have unloaded the clip on your colleagues, but why did you get into that work and why did you put your life on the line that 10 plus year run?

[Eamon Mohideen]

So it was, you know, a part of it was the circumstance of the events that were happening. Right? I mean the, the last 25 years in the Middle east have been transformative. So when I, when I was coming up as a journalist, because of 9, 11, you had from 2001 till 2003, the Afghanistan, the beginning of the Afghanistan war. Then in 2003 till 2006 you had the Iraq war. Then you had in 2006 the first Israel Lebanon war. Then 2008 to 2010 you had the first Gaza war. 2011 you had the beginning of the Arab Spring. Then you had the Syrian revolution, the Libyan revolution, the Yemeni revolution, then had the rise of ISIS in 2014. Then you had the war in Gaza of 2014. So there are circumstances that I couldn't control. But as a journalist who was committed to covering the region, it was just nonstop war, destruction, revolution, uprisings. And I was just very committed to covering it. I was very. You know, I think that most journalists who put their lives on the line fundamentally ask themselves one question at one point in their career. Is my life worth what I am doing now? And that is a question that you ask at certain points in your career. You may revisit it when you start a family. You may revisit as you get older. You may revisit it if you slow down a step and you realize that your body's, you know, changing and you can't deal with the adrenaline as much as you used to be. But for the fundamental question of is your life worth what you're trying to show? It is something that most journalists answer at one point in their life. And if you're committed to it, you stay with it. I know people who are my age now who are still doing it. And it's not that I wouldn't do it again. It's just that I'm at a different stage in my life, different obligations, you know, different responsibilities professionally.

[Hasan Piker]

How did you get your dad to be okay with it? Because I get asked this dumb question all the time. They're like, how did you get your dad to be okay with you doing comedy? It's like, dude, I'm doing a weekend at Rooster T Feathers Comedy Club in Sunnyvale, California. That is very different than you covering a war in Syria.

[Eamon Mohideen]

I mean, I think they saw in me a commitment that knew I was really motivated to do it. I think they understood the importance of the job. I mean, they were very afraid. I'm not going to pretend that they weren't afraid. I'm not going to pretend that they didn't try to discourage me at certain points, but I think they always helped me try to assess risk and assess whether or not I was taking risks for the right reasons and whether or not those risks were measured.

[Hasan Piker]

Guys, it's summertime and I want to glow from within. This is not an ad for Islam though, inshallah you will find it. I am talking about a healthy glow from nutrients and fiber. Now here's the problem. Y' all know how hard it is to keep your routine when you travel. Now I travel a lot and it's even worse in the summer. Wedding season will be the death of me. That is why this month I am checking a suitcase full of Huel that is H U E L We are officially halfway through this year and I am hanging onto my New Year's resolutions by a hangnail. Huel is the one reason I haven't completely fallen off my nutrition goals. The Black edition Ready to Drink has been my salvation. I drink it ice cold from the fridge and it's got 35 grams of protein, 27 essential vitamins and minerals, and 7 grams of fiber per bottle. It is a complete meal, not a protein shake and it's less than five bucks a serving. Cheaper than a latte and much better for my tummy. HUEL is 100% plant based, gluten free and has no artificial sweeteners, colors or flavors. Plus it's prep free. Just chuck it in your suitcase. Get this limited time offer. Get 15% off on Huel online with my code [e-mail] Husson15 new customers only. Limited time so don't sit on it. Thank you to Huell for partnering and supporting our show. You know what guys? I am sick of banks making me feel the fool. Overdraft fees, ATM fees. I feel like they're just waiting for a screw up to cash in big time. It feels gross. Dare I say predatory. But now I know about Chime and you need to too. They offer the most rewarding fee. Free banking out there. Free ATMs, no monthly fees built for you. Not the 1% you know. Chime is the bank of the people because when you call them you get actual people. That's right, human beings. No robots with typing sounds. Why do they always have the typing sounds? It's like I know you're a robot. Just admit it. You can actually earn benefits with chime, including 5% cash back on the Chime card in your category of choice, like gas or groceries. Savings that grow nine times faster than the national average with a 3.75% annual percentage rate and you even get airport lounge access included with your Chime card. I just wish I'd known about Chime sooner. Chime is not just smarter banking. It is the most rewarding way to bank Join the millions who are already banking fee free today. Head to Chime.comHUSN that is Chime.comHUSN it only takes a few minutes to sign up. Chime is a fintech, not a bank. Banking services for Chime Card provided by Chime's bank partners. Optional products and services may have fees or charges, stated annual percentage yield and cash back for Chime prime only. No minimum balance required. For more information on APY rates and travel perks, go to Chime.com disclosures Chime

[Eamon Mohideen]

is a fintech, not a bank. Banking services for MyPay and Chime card provided by Chime's bank partners. Optional products and services may have fees or charges. Stated annual percentage yield and cash back for Chime prime only. No minimum balance required. Checking account ranking based on the J.D. power survey published October 20, 2025. For more information on APY rates, MyPay, Spot Me and travel perks, go to

[Hasan Piker]

Chime.com disclosures praised as Hulu's fresh spin on crime comedy by variety, Deli Boys returns with an all new season. Philly's favorite corner store, Criminal Family is back. The darbiz is booming, but their money needs laundering asap. Enter Max Sugar, Casino King and Lucky Auntie's newest toxic situationship, played by the legendary Fred Armisen. More money, more problems and more guest stars including Andrew Reynolds, Kumail Nanjiani and Lilly Singh. The all new season of the Hulu original series Deli Boys is now streaming on Hulu and Hulu on Disney for bundle subscribers. Terms apply. Now you reported from Iraq from 2003 to 2005. Now obviously there are many things that I Could talk about many upsetting things I could talk about. But I want to address one of the dumbest things. I recently went on ebay and I bought a set of vintage cards. These are the 2003 Iraqi Most Wanted playing cards. These were being sold during the war in Iraq. Now, apparently, all but three people in this deck have been captured or killed. Is this weird? Is this weird that I had to buy a pack of terrorism trading cards? Is this what we have to do to explain things to the American public?

[Eamon Mohideen]

This is very weird. I'll tell you something, though, that was made for American soldiers, which is even more interesting. And this deck of cards is one example of what we provide to soldiers out.

[Hasan Piker]

Soldiers and Marines out in the field with the faces of the individuals and

[Eamon Mohideen]

what their role is. Yes, you can get that now. And they're available. But this was something that the Pentagon did in the lead up to the war and basically handed those out to soldiers to kind of be on the lookout in Iraq for these types of.

[Hasan Piker]

That's weird that a soldier wanted to flip it. He's like, look, I have no use for this because I bought this off ebay. I mean, what do you find particularly weird about it?

[Eamon Mohideen]

There's an element of gamification of war in the way these things are presented. So I think that there is a lot of propaganda in war. Right. And when governments embark on leading a country to war, you want to try and convince your public and your narrative of a just war. You want to make your soldiers believe that what you're about to embark on is a just war. And you want to try to make it as simple as possible to see the other side not as humans, but as enemies. And if you can reduce them to playing cards, if you can strip away anything to do with who these people are, why they're in this situation, whether they are ministers or officials or ordinary people, it becomes easier for you as a soldier, as a society, to accept killing them, to accept violence against them.

[Hasan Piker]

Turn them into Marvel villains.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Turn them into Marvel villains.

[Hasan Piker]

Magneto, Red Skull, Loki.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Right.

[Hasan Piker]

Green Goblin. Capture, kill. Problem solved.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Exactly. Exactly.

[Hasan Piker]

What's your reaction to that, as someone who covers this in the media? And how did you respond to some of your colleagues that overly simplified it into a trading card like situation?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Well, sadly, the problem hasn't been solved. You've killed leaders, and leaders are interchangeable. I mean, you're literally seeing this play out right now in Iran. Right. No playing cards in Iran. But the narrative of we've killed their supreme leader only for a new supreme leader to emerge, or whether it is we've killed the top 40 Iranian generals and scientists, or only for a new generation of leaders to emerge. So the idea that you're just going to kill your way through a leadership and expect that to change the fundamental problems of any society has proven time and time again has not worked. So whether you are a member of the media or a member of the media class who advocates for that type of policy, or you're a politician who advocates for that type of policy, I simply say it doesn't work. History has shown us it doesn't work. People who study this have told us it doesn't work, and you have to find another solution other than just simply bombing your way through it.

[Hasan Piker]

Most Americans have forgotten about Iraq. That was, like, sadly, five wars ago. But how did our interventions impact what's happening on the ground in Iraq today?

[Eamon Mohideen]

I mean, we decimated a state, we destroyed its institutions. We fractured the country ethnically. We allowed that country to descend into civil war. And that bred a generation of terrorists that went on to attack Europe and the United States as a result of isis. That faction of, of a group then spilled over into Syria, destabilized Syria, and led to violence and civil war in that country. Those two things combined led to millions of refugees displaced across the region that we're still suffering from around the world. As a result of that, economically, it suppressed a part of the world that historically had been very vibrant and had at one point, thriving. Culture, economy, science, trade, all of that has been set back decades as a result of, of America's invasion of war in 2003, and not to mention the damage that it has done to American soldiers, to American lives, to American treasure, and also to our understanding of rule of law and accountability. I say this all the time because no American official was ever held accountable for the lies that they led us into war based on. I mean, American officials lied. We know that they lied. They fabricated all kinds of excuses, and no American official was ever held accountable for that.

[Hasan Piker]

What type of accountability are you talking about?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Well, for starters, public accountability. I mean, I think that we never had a reckoning in this country about what led us into that war. Who are the officials who drummed up these excuses? You know, There was a 911 Commission after the 911 attacks, but we never carried out such a commission in the 2003 war that pinpointed and said this was the failure in the American political system that allowed for this type of mistake to happen. And again, I bring up a very important point. Here when you think of American presidents and their ability to launch wars, they have to, under American law and the Constitution, get authorization from Congress. Now there are certain loopholes that allow American presidents to conduct war for short periods of time, like 60 days. But fundamentally you have to go to Congress, which is the most deliberative body in America, to say we want to go to war, provide us the funds and the means to declare that war. And what we're seeing right now is America and presidents using the Authorization for the Use of Military Force AUMF that was passed in 2001 in the wake of 9 11, right after the attacks,

[Hasan Piker]

the Bush administration demanded from Congress the

[Eamon Mohideen]

legal authorization to use military force against those they deemed responsible for the attack. The Senate soon approved the Authorization for

[Hasan Piker]

Use of Military Force.

[Eamon Mohideen]

In the house, it passed 420 to 1. The lone dissenting voice was Democratic Congressmember Barbara Lee of California.

[Hasan Piker]

California, who three days after the 911 attack voted no. Some of us must say, let's step

[Eamon Mohideen]

back for a moment. Let's just pause, just for a minute and think through the implications of our

[Hasan Piker]

actions today so that this does not

[Eamon Mohideen]

spiral out of control. There was this AUMF that was passed that basically said we're at a war with terrorism, the so called war on terrorism. And that has been open ended. There's no end to that war. Anytime any American president wants to come and just use it, they can use it. They literally used it to justify the Iraq war. They use it to bomb in Nigeria, they use it to bomb in Yemen, in Somalia, they used it to bomb in Venezuela. Which is like, well that, what does that have to do with the war on terrorism? And as you probably have noticed in recent weeks and months, the narrative that Venezuela was now becoming this nexus of narco terrorism, I allowed them to say, well, we're still using the 2001 AUMF to carry out strikes and regime change in Venezuela because there's a connection between Venezuela, an alleged connection, they never provided any evidence, but an alleged connection between Venezuela and Iran and terrorist groups and narco trafficking, which they now call narco terrorism.

[Hasan Piker]

You live in Gaza. You are one of the only American anchors that has actually lived in Gaza and you lived there for over two years. What perspective that did that give you?

[Eamon Mohideen]

I mean it's, it changes your life. It's fundamentally, it changes your life on several experiences. One, living through a war, which I did in 2008, 2009 was just incredibly profound, deeply disturbing, and that changes you. But also understanding on a granular level what has happened in Gaza, you know, over the course of 20 years and where that situation has brought us to today, you realize how. How many missed opportunities there were to write a different course of history than what has happened.

[Hasan Piker]

How did living through a war in 2008 and 2009 shape you? I mean, what do you witness on the ground that makes that, you know, changes your life or the trajectory of your life, or even the way you look at the issue?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Man, you witness so much suffering. You witness so much pain. You witness so much innocence being destroyed and lost. You know, at one point in Gaza, it wasn't in 2008, but it was in a later war that I covered in 2014. I remember interviewing a mother who had infertility problems, and she finally managed to have kids, and her kids were killed as a result of an Israeli strike. And I remember just kind of speaking to her and her showing me, you know, the results of her fertility exams. When she found out that she was pregnant the first time, it was one of the things that she was able to preserve, and it was just unbelievably heartbreaking. You know, I wouldn't appreciate that even more so until years later in my own life, just like having children and knowing people who have had fertility problems. And you kind of go back and you think about that moment and you realize what a. What a tragedy that human beings are still doing this to each other and capable of inflicting such harm and destruction to each other because they refuse to talk to each other and refuse to be able to understand each other and what people want.

[Hasan Piker]

In 2014, you reported from Gaza during Operation Protective Edge. I've heard you talk about this story of you on the beach and what you witness. Take us through that.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Sure. It was during the war, and we were out on an assignment in Gaza City and returning back to our hotel as a crew. And we were kind of using our hotel that was on the beach at the time, the Dira Hotel. We were using it as our kind of makeshift studio and workspace. A lot of foreign journalists stayed there. It was actually one of the few buildings that was known to the Israeli military because it housed so many international journalists, but also occasional UN workers. And when we were returning to the hotel after being out in the field for a couple of hours, there were a group of children who were playing just in front of the hotel, soccer. And we were just kind of mingling. Going into the hotel, I saw the kids. We kicked the ball around for a few minutes. They then ran to the outside onto the side of the hotel down towards the beach. And surprisingly, even in the middle of a war, a lot of Palestinians in Gaza would go to the beach just for a few minutes of rest and escapism, if you will, to look out into the sea. So the kids went to the side of the beach as the side of the hotel, down to the beach. A group of journalists were kind of sitting on the terrace of the hotel overlooking the beach. And I was in the lobby, I think, going to my room when a series of strikes happened. Gaza officials say the youngsters from the same family were playing when they were killed by shelling from an Israeli gunboat. And of course, in the immediate, you know, aftermath, we didn't know who was struck, we don't know what was struck. But a lot of the foreign journalists who were sitting on the terrace of the hotel immediately saw that it was a group of young kids who had run down from the main road onto the side of the hotel to the beach. And immediately we ran, you know, ran down to see what had happened to them. Incredible pictures that were taken by various photographers. And then immediately we realized they were young kids. I and my crew ended up getting in a separate vehicle, driving to the hospital, following the car that was carrying the children that had just been struck. And we had arrived just as the mother was arriving to the hospital where she had found out that her kids, and I think also because they weren't all for her kids, it was her, two of her kids and maybe, and some cousins, but it was all from the same family. I don't want to get it wrong, but it was four children from the same extended family, and one of the mothers had arrived and had heard the news that they were killed.

[Hasan Piker]

Did you see the coverage from the Guardian by Peter Beaumont?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Yes.

[Hasan Piker]

Okay, so I want to show our viewers this, but let's just revisit this real quick. So this is how it was written about in the Guardian. The first projectile hit the sea wall of Gaza City's little harbor just after 4:00'.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Clock.

[Hasan Piker]

As the smoke from the explosion thinned, four figures could be seen running. They waved and chattered at the watching journalists as they passed a little collection of brightly colored beach tents used by bathers in peacetime. It was there that the second shell hit the beach. Those firing apparently adjusting their fire to target the fleeing survivors. So this part I found to be particularly disturbing. All the journalists were there, but what Peter is kind of setting up here is that those children were targeted.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Yeah.

[Hasan Piker]

Am I reading this correctly?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Yes.

[Hasan Piker]

You were there with NBC News. Is it true that you didn't report on this on NBC News that night?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Yeah, I mean, there's a little bit more context to it, but yes. Yeah.

[Hasan Piker]

And then were you asked to leave Gaza and were you replaced by another reporter?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Yes.

[Hasan Piker]

The correspondent was Richard Engel.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Yeah.

[Hasan Piker]

So is he more of a Call of Duty reporter?

[Eamon Mohideen]

No.

[Hasan Piker]

I mean, would you say he was essentially parachuted in?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Well, he didn't. He wasn't in Gaza at the time. I think the. The frustrating part about that experience in that moment was that Richard was in Tel Aviv. I was inside Gaza, he was in Tel Aviv. And so I had witnessed the event. I had seen the event. I had gone to the hospital. I had interviewed the mother. I had interviewed one of the survivors. And, you know, our crew filmed it, and it was extremely frustrating. But at the time, the editorial decision was to have Richard, who is the chief foreign correspondent, do the story from Tel Aviv. And there's a variety of, you know, factors that go into making that decision. It's. It's not something that I make. It's the various producers and show executives that make those decisions.

[Hasan Piker]

You've also written about the use of white phosphorus. Now, I've seen that recently come up again. What is white phosphorus?

[Eamon Mohideen]

White phosphorus is a munition that basically, when deployed, I mean, it's a chemical agent. When it's deployed, it creates an unbelievable glow in the sky and a big white cloud. And it's not illegal under international law to use, but it's regulated as to when it can be used in very specific areas. So it's supposed to be meant to be used by armies advancing against other armies. And if you're advancing and you want to kind of like create a smoke screen so the other army doesn't see where you are in your troop movements, that's when it's allowed to be used in open areas. Unfortunately, in. In Gaza, the Israelis used it on very densely populated civilian areas where there are no standing armies. And so the white phosphorus is extremely toxic, but it's also very dangerous. And it burns, and it literally, if it lands on you, it will burn a hole through your flesh, through your bones, through everything. So they deployed that on a lot of the northern parts of Gaza. And it was very sad because there were parts where young children didn't know what it was, and they were kind of running out to kind of kick the little, you know, piece of the white phosphorus that had landed in their community, not knowing what it was, and it would burn through them. In other cases, it would land on the building and burn and create all kinds of damage and destruction on the ground. In Jabalia, home To more than 100,000 Palestinians, children unaware of the deadly toxin dropped on them, naively playing with the munitions. As allegations that Israel is using weapons illegally against a civilian population mount a claim that Israel rejects, there is no doubt that it's the Palestinian people that are continuing to suffer, and there's no sign that the suffering will end anytime soon. Ayman Muhedin, Al Jazeera, Gaza.

[Hasan Piker]

The Community to Protect Journalists reported that in 2025, 129 media workers were killed at the highest since they started tracking. Now, most of these people were in Gaza. Do you think your colleagues in America feel that solidarity with those journalists?

[Eamon Mohideen]

No, not enough.

[Hasan Piker]

Why?

[Eamon Mohideen]

You know, it's a good question. I don't know if I have an answer for it. I just think that it's not as strong as it should be. You know, I think there are so many layers to covering the Israeli Palestinian conflict that make it difficult for American journalists. And empathy and sympathy are probably two of them there. There's sometimes a lack of solidarity, as you said, but I think it has to do more with a lack of awareness and having no experience there on the ground. I don't think that they necessarily see Palestinian journalists like themselves. They don't see them necessarily as, you know, white European journalists like some of their colleagues. And so I think sometimes there are reasons to that structural distance, and it's very disappointing. I don't agree with it. I mean, I think the community of journalists, irrespective of where you are in this world, should be very united, should stand up for the same principles, and should not engage in what some journalists in this country have done, which is to try to vilify other journalists and justify their targeting and justify their killing, which I find extremely disturbing.

[Hasan Piker]

And what's an example of that?

[Eamon Mohideen]

I mean, there are journalists in the US and who have made cases as to why Palestinian journalists are not real journalists, that they are affiliated with militant groups. You know, there was a infamous article that came out about Palestinian journalists that basically tried to dehumanize them and say they're not like how we think of journalists. They're not the same types of journalists that we have in our society. And I think that basically serves as a justification or as a baseline justification for the use of violence against Palestinian journalists, which is, you know, as I said, completely unacceptable.

[Hasan Piker]

You're talking about this idea of empathy and sympathy. What do those ideas mean to you? What do you mean because you've talked about the double standards and media coverage in regards to the many conflicts that the United States is involved in around the world. It seems like empathy and sympathy and the lack of that seem to be a consistent.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Yeah, I mean, if you tell me there was a group of Mexican journalists that were killed trying to report on the cartels in Mexico, or a group of journalists in Ukraine who are trying to report on Russia's war in Ukraine, irrespective of anything that these journalists do, irrespective of how they cover the story, irrespective of their politics and their viewpoints, or the news organizations that they work for, I am always going to be sympathetic and I will have empathy for the work that they're trying to do. That is like where my baseline level of operating is. I don't sit there and try to justify and say, well, what was the journalist doing there? Well, that was kind of reckless to the journalist. Or that journalist deserved it. Or that journalist worked for state affiliated outlet, or that journalist worked for, you know, Russia 24, or that journalist works for whatever. So I, I try to separate myself first and foremost to saying, like if you are a journalist working in the complex lay of journalism around the world, you will have my sympathy and empathy. There are layers then to outside of safety and death. Do I agree with that journalist? Do I support that journalist? Do I support that kind of reporting? That's a completely different debate. But the baseline of solidarity for journalists and their right to do their job and their profession without fear of being killed, attacked, detained, harassed, as we're seeing in this country, that is absolutely unacceptable.

[Hasan Piker]

You know why I love summer? All those plans we made, they finally make it out of the group chat. It seems like there's more time to fit everyone in. Whatever you got in store this summer, capturing those memories is a must. That's why I love the iPhone 17 Pro that I picked up from AT&T. Its center stage, front camera auto adjusts the frame to fit everyone into these group selfies. You don't even have to turn your phone. No awkward cropping or asking strangers to take it. Just the perfect group selfie every time. And AT&T makes sharing those moments with everyone easy. Because you gotta share the pic or it didn't happen. Right? Right now at, at&t asks how you can get iPhone 17 Pro on them with eligible iPhone trade in any condition. Requires trade in of iPhone 15+ or higher. Excludes iPhone 16e and 17e requires eligible plan. Terms and restrictions apply, subject to change. Visit att.com iPhone or visit an AT&T store for details. Picture this. You're finally taking time to clean out your gutters. Not fun, but hey, good for you. Your elbows deep in soggy leaves. And then suddenly, the smoke alarm starts blaring from inside. Smoke pours out the window. What do you do? ADTs do it yourself systems are built for those moments in your life when everything turns on a dime. They're affordable, easy to set up, and the ADT plus app keeps you in control 24. 7 from virtually anywhere, tackle your to do list knowing that your home is protected. When every second Counts, count on ADT. Visit ADT.com or call 1-800-ADT ASAP. You know, for me, you almost feel like the Forrest Gump of recent Middle Eastern history because you reported from Gaza, you reported from Iraq, from Syria, from Ukraine. You were also at Tahrir Square in 2011 with Al Jazeera. Now, as someone who was born in Egypt, what did that moment feel like for you?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Oh, it was incredible. It was very emotional. It was probably the only time, I think I cried on tv.

[Hasan Piker]

What did that moment mean for you?

[Eamon Mohideen]

I mean, it was a moment of. Yeah, I mean, so growing up as an Egyptian American, you always had this sense that Egypt as a country had tremendous potential. It is a great country with great people, great history, and unbelievable sense of national identity. But it never realized that fulfillment, it never fulfilled that promise, if you will, of what it can be because of a variety of reasons. And one of the reasons was that it was not a free society, that it was always ruled in an authoritarian way, so that the people, the great people of Egypt never were able to fully realize their potential. So in that brief moment in 2011, I think that the vast majority of Egyptians felt that they were about to realize that potential. They had just overthrown an authoritarian leader who had been there for, I think, 30 plus years, if not a little bit more. And there was this sense of euphoria that the country was going to transform into a truly free, democratic, tolerant, pluralistic society.

[Hasan Piker]

Well, how do Egyptians put that whole thing in perspective? Now, specifically, you have the revolution, and it's followed by another dictatorship. Are they just like, all right, look, we tried, it didn't work. Now we just got to kind of lay back in the cut. I mean, what's the. What is the.

[Eamon Mohideen]

I think. I think there are different parts of society that have different feelings. I mean, one part of society definitely feels that the instability of the 2011 revolution is not worth the headache right. Like 2011, as one would expect, brought a lot of instability, and with that instability brought a lot of uncertainty, both economically, politically, security wise. And so people were like, oh, I don't, I don't like this. I want my life to be a stable, stable as possible. I don't want this disruption in the quality of my life. I don't want this sense of anxiety. I don't want this sense of uncertainty. I don't want this economic hardship. And so people are like, just put it all back in, into a bottle and bring about whatever leader that's going to kind of like stabilize the situation and try to improve the economic and political situation. That unfortunately, was a, was a deal that was made that has brought about more restrictive and authoritarian politics in Egypt. And that's where we find ourselves today.

[Hasan Piker]

Is there still a strong resistance that continues or has that pretty much been quelled and quiet?

[Eamon Mohideen]

I think that the. I don't know if I would use the word resistance. I think there is still an aspiration. I think that there is a strong aspiration in Egypt for a truly democratic society. Now, whether that aspiration manifests itself into protests, whether it manifests itself through gradual political participation, I think the expression that people use now is evolution, not revolution. People want to see an evolution of this state as opposed to being a democratic, as opposed to being an authoritarian state. They want to see it evolve into a democratic state and not just completely toppled and rebuilt. And there are several examples in the region that show that revolutions don't necessarily work in terms of immediate improvement. So people look at, say, what happened in Syria, what happened in Libya, what happened in Yemen, and say those countries descended into years of civil war, let's avoid that. And unfortunately, the politicians as well, and some of the leaders in countries like Egypt exploit that and say, you don't want to end up like Syria, you don't want to end up like Libya, you don't want to end up like Yemen. You don't want too much instability, because if you get instability, we could find ourselves in a civil war. And so it's created this paralysis between a truly genuine aspiration for a democratic, pluralistic society and also this unease and nervousness of, I don't want to rock the boat too much because I don't want the country to descend into and get fractured and become a failed state.

[Hasan Piker]

Did that moment that you witnessed in Tahrir Square when you're crying and those are tears of joy, I'm assuming.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Yeah, I think, I mean, like, it's, my dad is you know, my dad is an immigrant from Egypt. He came to this country and, you know, the experience when you, when you're kind of weighted by the sacrifices your parents make and the home that they left to try to give you a better future and a promise in this country, you ask yourself all those questions about doubt, regret.

[Hasan Piker]

Yeah.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Are you fulfilling that promise, that immigrant promise that they had for you? And so all of that kind of came to the surface in that moment because you realize, like, man, what a euphoric moment. Is this the Egypt that my parents had dreamt of? Is this the Egypt that my family had always wanted to see? Is this the beginning of it and I just got to be a part of it and deliver that news?

[Hasan Piker]

Are you jaded now? You know, going through that? Do you become jaded at the possibility of change whenever people think of big revolution or the possibility of change in quote, unquote democratic societies? As someone who got to witness it, not see it through? As an American, are you like, hey, you have to measure, you know, have tempered expectations?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Not at all.

[Hasan Piker]

Really.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Yeah, I remain very optimistic. I remain very hopeful in human potential. I, I believe that humans, you know, yearn to be free. They yearn to have self determination. They yearn to have control of their lives and have a say in how their lives are governed. So I still very much believe in, in, you know, people's hope and, and I truly, truly believe in people power.

[Hasan Piker]

You know, can you give me an Iran war update? But put it in playing card terms. Have the good guys defeated all the bad guys, or do I need to get another deck of cards?

[Eamon Mohideen]

You're probably gonna have to get another deck of cards because the US and Israel have killed a lot of senior Iranian officials. But the war is not over and they're probably on like a second round of cards. There's new leaders that have emerged. We've got a new supreme leader, we've got new commanders in the military, in the irgc, we've got new nuclear scientists. So fundamentally, nothing has changed, just the playing.

[Hasan Piker]

Dark, what's your analysis of the coverage of American media covering this war now? Have we learned our lesson from the suck on this energy of 2003?

[Eamon Mohideen]

We are doing a little bit better because the media environment that we're operating in allows more voices in the mix. We are able to hear from Iranians directly when there is Internet connectivity. But also there are many people around the world now who can participate in this conversation through social media, through other outlets, through independent media, through podcasts. And because the, the Conversation has widened. You get more viewpoints, you get more opinions. And so anytime you have more conversation, you get better outcomes. In 2003, the Internet wasn't what it was. Podcasts weren't what they were. Social media wasn't what it was. So the conversation was very narrow and limited as to who gets to be the gatekeeper of information. That's not the case anymore. Have we learned all of the lessons? No, we still dehumanize and oversimplify and, you know, reduce conflicts. Also, we just have this tendency in American media and American society at large to, we always need to have a villain. We just, we love the kind of Rocky IV Ivan Drago Russian, you know, villain storyline, but we love it.

[Hasan Piker]

How should we look at it? What's, what's a healthier way to look at it? Because as someone who has an Indian background, one, we all, we all love villains. I mean, even in Indian dramas, the villain is the mother in law. So the mother in law is essentially isis. Well, it's like, what's another way to see that your mother in law can have multitudes?

[Eamon Mohideen]

I mean, it's the way that at the end of Rocky iv, he said, if you can change and I can change, we can all change. So at the end of the day, it's, you don't have to defeat your enemy to come to that realization. It's, you don't have to bomb and kill and destroy your way through 12 rounds of fighting to come to the realization, oh, wait, I can change. I can actually see the good in you and you can see the good in me, and we can try to find a way to, to talk about this. I think that we just need to shift our mindset from constantly trying to solve our problems militarily. That is like a fundamental problem in America where anytime we, we hit a roadblock or we feel that we're coming up against something that we don't like, whether it's an economic system or a political ideology or a country that doesn't want to be subservient to our interests in the region. Our quick instinct is to say, how do we sanction them? How do we isolate them? How do we potentially bomb them? And I just think that is such a destructive worldview to have. You can't just constantly be obsessed with how am I going to defeat my adversaries and my enemies militarily, economically, as opposed to say, well, let me actually see if I can talk to them and see if I can actually convince them of my worldview. Let me convince them of, like, what I have to offer that is so good that they'll say, hey, we actually. We realize that we want to be more like you, or we want to work with you, or we want to cooperate with you. But the idea of just constantly, like, sanctioning countries, killing people, denying them medicine, denying them food, denying them fuel, denying them development, and if they don't like it, we bomb them, and if they want to try to resist it, we bomb them even more, and we'll go in there and topple their regime. It's just. It's just a very barbaric way of living, I think.

[Hasan Piker]

Are there other forms of diplomacy that you found that are more effective that you wish was explored more in the United States of America? And are there any sort of examples of stories that you could point the audience to, to say, hey, this is an example of pulling other levers besides, you know, military strikes or illegal war?

[Eamon Mohideen]

I mean, some of our. Some of the countries that we've had the best relationships with have been as a result of diplomacy. I mean, even if they were, at one point, adversaries, whether it's, you know, Vietnam or. Or countries that we kind of, like, shunned for a long period of time. And then we realized, like, you know what? Maybe if we engage with them economically, culturally, politically, we can foster better understanding. So, you know, the history of American diplomacy is long. I mean, America is a country. It's a very old country. It's been around, you know, for 250 years, as we know, with. As a result of the UFC fight that's coming up. But at the end of the day, I think, like, if you actually engage diplomatically with countries, Russia is a. Is a perfect example. I mean, it was. Diplomacy is the reason why we did not go to war with Russia, nuclear war with Russia, the USSR for the better part of 50 years. It was. It was being able to engage with them and disagreeing with them, but being firm in our positions and our values that allowed us to ultimately kind of

[Hasan Piker]

break through right away, no delay.

[Eamon Mohideen]

This is something very special. When I was in Iraq, I was embedded with the American military while they were hunting for Saddam Hussein and his kids at one point. Okay, and so the American military.

[Hasan Piker]

But why were they hunting Saddam's kids?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Well, they were trying to arrest Saddam and his kids because they felt that they were. I mean, as, you know, the deck of cards. They wanted to arrest and kill or capture whoever's on the deck of cards.

[Hasan Piker]

Okay.

[Eamon Mohideen]

So the American military actually spent a lot of time going around Saddam Hussein's old hometown and putting up wanted dead or alive posters.

[Hasan Piker]

Whoa.

[Eamon Mohideen]

In Iraq. And it says, wanted dead or alive, $25 million reward. Call us with any information that can lead to his arrest.

[Hasan Piker]

And then there's a tip line right there. You can email them.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Yeah. Tips at O R H A dot Sencom Mil.

[Hasan Piker]

Got it.

[Eamon Mohideen]

So people in Tikrit who barely had any food or water, electricity were encouraged

[Hasan Piker]

to open up their Yahoo. Email account and email drop a tip to Centcom.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Exactly. But these posters actually are now collector's items. So.

[Hasan Piker]

Wait, so how did you. How did you have the. The foresight to be like, let me get one of these?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Well, what happened was I was embedded with the troops, and so there was, like, a whole stack of posters and.

[Hasan Piker]

Oh, it was like merch. It was like a merch table.

[Eamon Mohideen]

No, no. They weren't handing them out. They were literally plastering them on the wall. So I was just like, oh, do you mind if I grab a handful of these? And they said, yeah, absolutely. I mean, they had, like, hundreds of them. They were literally going around. It was like. It was very, like. It was wheat pace.

[Hasan Piker]

It was wheat pace.

[Eamon Mohideen]

It was like. Yeah, like, you know, like in New York, on the green, you know?

[Hasan Piker]

No, of course.

[Eamon Mohideen]

Post, no bills.

[Hasan Piker]

Yeah.

[Eamon Mohideen]

They were just going around the streets of Tikrit and, like, putting these up.

[Hasan Piker]

Okay.

[Eamon Mohideen]

So I was with a group of soldiers, and they said, you know what? You know, you realize as a journalist that you get to witness history sometimes.

[Hasan Piker]

Yeah.

[Eamon Mohideen]

And so I. I grabbed a handful of these, and I still have some. So I'm giving you.

[Hasan Piker]

Oh, man. Thank you.

[Eamon Mohideen]

So put that in your office.

[Hasan Piker]

And they got them, right?

[Eamon Mohideen]

They got them at the end. I don't know if it was based on a tip, but they got.

[Hasan Piker]

You want me to put this in my office?

[Eamon Mohideen]

Why not?

[Hasan Piker]

I'm telling you. I'm telling you, if I put this up in my office, booking might be tough. A lot of people can't read. What's. What's. I mean, it's. It's.

[Eamon Mohideen]

They. They got them.

[Hasan Piker]

I know.

[Eamon Mohideen]

We got them. We won.