Navigating Media Bias with Vanessa Otero

Summary

Episode Summary: Navigating Media Bias with Vanessa Otero

Introduction to the Episode
In this episode of Here's Where It Gets Interesting, host Sharon McMahon delves into the critical issue of media bias and its impact on society. Joined by Vanessa Otero, founder of Ad Fontes Media, the conversation explores the intricacies of media reliability, the challenges of misinformation, and effective strategies to navigate the complex news landscape.

Guest Introduction
Sharon welcomes Vanessa Otero, highlighting her role as the founder of Ad Fontes Media, renowned for the Media Bias Chart. Vanessa explains her journey, emphasizing the creation of the chart in 2016 as a tool to evaluate news sources based on bias and reliability. She states, “[...] in 2018, I founded Ad Fontes Media, to rate the news for reliability and bias in order to fight misinformation and polarization” (03:47).

Understanding Media Bias and Reliability
Vanessa and Sharon discuss the importance of distinguishing between media bias and reliability. Vanessa clarifies that media bias does not inherently equate to dishonesty, noting, “A news source can be biased but also quite reliable” (19:28). This distinction is crucial in understanding how different news outlets present information and opinions.

Methodology of Ad Fontes Media
Mike Gallagher, CEO of Ad Fontes Media, elaborates on their comprehensive methodology for assessing news sources. The team of 35 analysts, balanced politically across left, right, and center, meticulously rate media based on an eight-category reliability scale. Gallagher explains, “We have a likelihood of veracity evaluation process methodology, and our analysts take into account reputation, evidence, likelihood, and incentive” (07:10). This rigorous process ensures a nuanced placement of sources on their Media Bias Chart, reflecting both bias and factual accuracy.

Challenges in Differentiating News and Opinion
A significant portion of the discussion centers on the blurred lines between news reporting and opinion pieces. Vanessa highlights a common tactic in media: “They're making wild assertions but couching them as questions” (09:41). This rhetorical device can subtly introduce biased narratives without explicit statements, making it harder for consumers to discern fact from opinion.

Impact of Media Bias on Society
Vanessa and Mike delve into the societal consequences of pervasive media bias and misinformation. They cite studies, such as a Yale study showing how exposure to different news channels can drastically alter individuals' perceptions of reality (04:42). The hosts discuss real-world implications, including familial rifts, polarized communities, and challenges in passing legislation, underscoring the urgent need to address misinformation (35:31).

Solutions and Recommendations
To combat misinformation, Vanessa and Mike advocate for conscious news consumption habits. Mike advises, “Make choices about your news consumption like we make choices about our diet” (26:02). They recommend relying on highly reliable sources like AP News or Reuters and limiting daily news intake to prevent feeling overwhelmed. Additionally, they emphasize the importance of supporting original fact-based journalism over opinion-driven content.

Media Literacy and Educational Resources
Recognizing the critical role of education in fostering media literacy, Mike outlines the resources Ad Fontes Media offers for educators and individuals. From interactive media bias charts to comprehensive lesson plans, these tools are designed to equip users with the skills needed to critically evaluate news sources. Vanessa adds, “We provide tools, including our interactive media bias chart, our premium and pro editions, which allow classroom level access or school-wide library access” (41:03).

Conclusion
The episode wraps up with a strong call to action for listeners to take responsibility for their media consumption. Vanessa and Mike stress the importance of not supporting unreliable news sources and using available tools to make informed decisions. Sharon concludes by reiterating the significance of media literacy in maintaining a healthy, informed society.

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

• Vanessa Otero: “A news source can be biased but also quite reliable.” (19:46)
• Mike Gallagher: “Make choices about your news consumption like we make choices about our diet.” (26:02)
• Vanessa Otero: “We have to stop incentivizing the producers of the junk news by refusing to give them our eyeballs and our time.” (35:31)
• Mike Gallagher: “It's cheaper to have a pundit in studio or just by zoom. And you can have like 6 or 10 or 12 of them on one show.” (26:02)
• Vanessa Otero: “If you just purposely go to their apps or to their sites, then you're controlling the way that you get the information.” (26:02)

Key Takeaways

• Media Bias vs. Reliability: Understanding that bias does not necessarily mean a lack of reliability is essential for discerning information.
• Comprehensive Evaluation: Ad Fontes Media employs a detailed methodology to assess news sources, considering multiple factors beyond just political leaning.
• Impact of Misinformation: Media bias and misinformation have tangible effects on societal cohesion, political processes, and personal relationships.
• Proactive Consumption: Listeners are encouraged to actively choose reliable news sources and limit their intake to avoid misinformation.
• Educational Resources: Tools and resources provided by Ad Fontes Media are invaluable for educators and individuals aiming to enhance media literacy.

This episode serves as a profound exploration of media bias, offering listeners both the understanding and tools necessary to navigate the often confusing news landscape effectively.

Transcript

[Sharon McMahon]

If you're like me, you've always been fascinated by technology and the brilliant minds shaping our future. ARM is one of those innovators, and they've teamed up with NPM to bring you Tech Unherd, a new podcast that takes you behind the boardroom door with some of the most inspiring leaders in tech. Hosted by ARM CEO Renee Haas, TechUnherd dives into the journeys of top industry leaders, uncovering the trends driving their fields, along with a few entertaining stories of success and failure. In a recent episode, Rene had an engaging conversation with Mike Gallagher, head of securities at Palantir Technologies, to discuss leadership and the role of AI in national security and defense. Tech Unheard feels so immersive, like you're right there in the room listening to raw, unscripted conversations with tech's biggest names. It's insightful, inspiring and honestly a must listen for anyone who's passionate about the future of technology. Tune into Tech Unheard from ARM and npm. Wherever you get your podcasts, Spring is here and that means more time enjoying the outdoors and less time stuck in the kitchen. That's why I love Factor. Their fresh, ready to eat meals make eating well and effortless. All you have to do is heat and eat and get back to your day in two minutes. No prep, no mess. Every single thing that I have tried has been so good. They are packed with flavor. It's perfectly portioned. I hate feeling like I'm throwing away what I'm paying for and I also don't want to be hungry afterwards. So the perfect portions are amazing and it kept me full without slowing me down. With 45 weekly menu options, you can always find something that fits your goals, whether it's keto or Protein plus or calorie. Smart Factor also has quick breakfasts, easy lunches and even snacks and desserts so you never have to think twice about what to eat. No stress, just real chef crafted meals that let you savor more this season. Get [e-mail] hwigi 50 off that's here's where it gets interesting. 50 off and use code hwigi50off to get 50 off plus free shipping on your first box. That's factor meals.com h w I g I 50 off for 50% off plus free shipping hello friends. Welcome, Delighted. You're with me today. My guest is Vanessa Otero and Vanessa is the founder of Ad Fontes Media and I have spoken about this platform many times. They are the home of the Media Bias chart and they don't just evaluate News sources for left right bias. They also evaluate them for reliability. And this conversation about why media bias is important to understand and how we evaluate it, I think it's going to be incredibly useful. Useful. So thanks for being here, and let's dive in. I'm Sharon McMahon, and here's where it gets interesting.

[Vanessa Otero]

I know that the people who listen to this podcast, first of all, love what you do. If they're familiar with you. If they're not familiar with you yet, they're going to love what you do. This is a topic we talk about, truly every week, especially on Instagram, and I am so excited to just hear what you have to say. Can you give us a brief introduction about your work and how you got to do the type of work that. That you're currently engaged in?

[Mike Gallagher]

Absolutely. I love to talk about this. I'm the founder and CEO of a company called Ad Fontes Media, and you may know us for our famous Media Bias Chart. And how I came to be in this position talking to you today is because in 2016, I created the original version of the Media Bias Chart, which was just something designed to talk to my friends and family about reliability and bias of news sources. It got really popular. And then in 2018, I founded this company, Ad Fontes Media, to rate the news for reliability and bias in order to fight misinformation and polarization. So now I have a team of analysts to do this with me. We can get into more details about that, but I'm really excited to be here because these are problems I know that are near and dear to your heart, because we just see how this affects people, families, friends, so many aspects of our society. So really excited to talk about this.

[Vanessa Otero]

You're absolutely right. I recently read a Yale study that took people who were avid watchers of one news channel and paid them to watch a competitor news channel for a period of time, and they ensured that they were actually watching the competitor news channel by giving them quizzes. And the results were pretty remarkable in terms of the people who, you know, completed the study had a very different picture of what is happening in the world than they did before they started.

[Mike Gallagher]

Yes, that's absolutely the case. I mean, I know the study that you're talking about and doing what we do. That's not surprising to me because we have teams of analysts who are politically balanced, left, right, and center, and we have to watch and rate and read news articles and shows, episodes from across the political spectrum, which means people on our team are just regularly consuming content that they would Normally never consume. And at first it's sort of jarring and shocking. I don't know if you've ever had the experience or heard someone say, or maybe you've said it yourself. You walk into a room, a certain cable news channel is on that you don't like on left or right, and you say, oh, I can't even watch that. Just turn it off. Because it viscerally feels bad to watch something that you disagree with and to get over that hump of like just sitting there and seeing it to understand what other people are consuming. We sort of force ourselves to do that every single day, a hundred percent.

[Vanessa Otero]

I hear that all of the time from people in my community as well, where they're like, I don't believe a word Blank says. Pick a news outlet. Wherever they align themselves politically, they believe that the news outlet that aligns with their political beliefs is the true and correct news outlet.

[Mike Gallagher]

Yes.

[Vanessa Otero]

And anything that does not align with their beliefs is feeding you lies.

[Mike Gallagher]

Yeah. And that's. That's pretty tough given that you've got folks on both sides, all sides, thinking the exact same thing. So not everyone can be right.

[Vanessa Otero]

And right now I feel like. Do you agree with this? That right now so many people have the standard of if I agree with it, it's true agreement is the benchmark for truth, and if I don't agree with it, then it's a lie.

[Mike Gallagher]

Right. And that is what we refer to as a bad heuristic. It's a bad shortcut. The world is complicated. There's a lot of information out there. We're in this period, this information age, where we have access to more information than we ever have, which is a net benefit. That's good. But we're going through these growing pains because we don't quite know how to sort through all that information. We haven't developed all the tools necessary to sort through that information. So we rely on these shortcuts. And agreement is one of those shortcuts. And there are other, more important ways to measure how likely the truth is of something. And in our own system, we have a likelihood of veracity evaluation process methodology, and our analysts take into account reputation, evidence, likelihood, and incentive. So there's an acronym reli, and often folks will just rely on one or fewer of those. And you really have to consider all of them, especially evidence.

[Vanessa Otero]

What a weird idea, Vanessa, that you might actually want to have evidence for the claims that you're making. And it's revolutionary.

[Mike Gallagher]

It sounds like this is something near and dear to your Heart.

[Vanessa Otero]

It is a revolutionary notion.

[Mike Gallagher]

I know.

[Vanessa Otero]

Wild assertions with no evidence. Yes, yes.

[Mike Gallagher]

Unfortunately, a lot of our news and news like landscape is that it's just assertions, just conclusions, statements of meaning, inferences, and not being able to sort those from fact statements. It's understandable why it's so difficult for folks. I mean, when we have so much information coming at us, sometimes we don't pause to like, slow down and say, like, what are the facts, the new pieces of information that this supposed news is delivering to me? And we don't necessarily realize that most of it in those formats is not new information, new factual information. It's just opinions and analysis. And there's nothing wrong with opinions and analysis. But we have to be able to differentiate when something is more like news and when something is more like opinion and analysis.

[Vanessa Otero]

I really want to get into your methodology about how you determine the ratings of some of a news organization's both bias and also its factualness. I do have one other thing that I have observed recently that I wanted to run by you.

[Mike Gallagher]

Yeah.

[Vanessa Otero]

One of the things that I've noticed that some people in their news like environments have been doing, which is making wild assertions but couching them as questions.

[Mike Gallagher]

Yes.

[Vanessa Otero]

They're like, I'm just asking questions. Is Vanessa actually an alien? It's a fair question.

[Mike Gallagher]

Right?

[Vanessa Otero]

You know what I mean? And in reality, it's not a fair question. There's no evidence that you're in that you're an alien life force. And asking the question then plants the seed in the viewer's mind that there is some legitimacy to the question that is being asked when there's absolutely no evidence to back up that legitimacy.

[Mike Gallagher]

Yes. And that is a great marker, a great red flag for news like information that may not be very reliable because news is answers, news is not questions. And it's the journalists. They might like, start out with the question that they're asking in order to write the article, but. But the article itself shouldn't be a bunch of questions. And even when the article starts, even for reputable publishers, saying, you know, this raises the question that blah, blah, blah, when you see that it's starting to get away from fact reporting into analysis. But the phenomenon that you observe is absolutely a trope. It is a rhetorical device. It's a logical fallacy even to ask questions. It's called begging the question. And so you're making an implied claim. Because we see it as a question and not a statement, we will sort of dismiss it and allow it. And not say, well, that's a lie, because the question is not a lie, but the answer, if you were to answer it in the affirmative, is a lie. It's just a sneaky way of getting folks to answer the question in the affirmative in their heads. This is a really, really common trope. And the more you see it, the more you identify it. Just seeing this format can help you avoid this sort of misinformation. Our minds like to make up stories. This is a really common trope with conspiracy theories in general. What is the government not telling you who is behind all of this? It implies that the government's not telling you something and somebody is behind this. Right. Without providing any evidence for what it is or what they're doing. So that's the opposite of news. And you know, just identifying it is a huge step towards not being susceptible to the underlying implied claims that are not true and not supportive of evidence.

[Vanessa Otero]

I really liked what you just said, that news is providing answers. News is not asking questions. Right? Asking questions is not the news.

[Mike Gallagher]

Right? Anyone can ask questions. Journalists are in a position to provide answers and that's what they should do. That's what we rely on them for.

[Vanessa Otero]

But a lot of people, especially on cable news, are not journalists, nor do.

[Mike Gallagher]

They pretend to be in courts of law, right? And that's sort of tricky for folks because literally the name news is in the title of Fox News and CNN Cable News Network. Right? And when it's not, they don't shift over at a point in the programming and say, and now we bring to you only opinion or only entertainment, right? There's no like delineation. And you know, there are some newspapers that do that, like more traditional newspapers that have been around for a long time, like the Wall Street Journal or the New York Times or the Washington Post. But even if you look at our printed media landscape, there's a ton of stuff out there that just analysis, like well argued opinion that's not labeled as such. If you look on the right, there's a libertarian magazine called Reason. There's on the left, there is a explainer publication called Vox. And those are both like heavily analysis. They're just not labeled news or opinion. And we have to make those judgments for ourselves. And even within a channel, a cable news channel, the morning show might be a lot of factual reporting and the evening shows are extremely different and they're almost all opinion. So important for people to make those distinctions.

[Vanessa Otero]

Such a good point too, that the programming changes throughout the day just like it does on if you're just watching cbs. You turn it on in the morning, they have a morning show, they have cooking, they give you the headlines and then it moves into like soap operas, game shows, and then their evening shows, which are more like adult type sitcoms or whatever. So the programming changes throughout the day. And that is also true of cable news channels. The programming changes throughout the day, but the name of the channel remains the same, right? Perhaps some people believe that everything on this channel, again, I'm not picking on any channel in particular. I'm just like making very broad, sweeping generalizations. But a lot of people then are led to believe that everything that is on this channel is news, right?

[Sharon McMahon]

Big yard, small yard, no yard, no problem. Fast Growing Trees is the biggest online nursery in the United states, offering over 6,000 plants to fit any space. Whether you need shade, privacy, or just want to add some beauty to your home, they've got you covered. And forget about the hassle of weekend trips to the nursery. Fast Growing Trees deliver straight to your door in just a few days, making it easier than ever to create your dream yard. I recently bought a golden pothos and I am so excited to get it in my office. This office is just all hard spaces and I really need some greenery and softness in here. And Fast Growing Trees also has a 14 point quality checklist so you know you're getting the best plants possible. Each plant is cared for individually before it even gets to you, meaning they arrive in top notch condition. Plus every plant comes with the instructions to help them thrive. I need those this spring. They have the best deals for your yard, up to half off on select plants and other deals. And listeners to our show get 15% off their first purchase when using the code Sharon at checkout. That's an additional 15% [e-mail] using the code Sharon at checkout fastgrowingtrees.com code Sharon now is the perfect time to plant. Use she Sharon to save today. Offers valid for a limited time. Terms and conditions may apply.

[Courtney Harrell]

Imagine if you could ask someone anything you wanted about their finances. How much do you make? Who paid for that fancy dinner? What did your house actually cost? On every episode of what we Spend, a different guest opens up their wallets, opens up their lives, really, and tells us all about their finances. For one week. They tell us everything they spend their money on.

[Sharon McMahon]

My son slammed like $6 worth of.

[Vanessa Otero]

Blueberries in five minutes.

[Courtney Harrell]

This is a podcast about all the ways money comes into our lives and then leaves again. Which of course we all have a.

[Mike Gallagher]

Lot of feelings about I really want these things. I want to own a house, I want to have a child.

[Sharon McMahon]

But this morning I really wanted a coffee.

[Courtney Harrell]

Because whatever you are buying or not buying or saving or spending at the end of the day, money is always about more than your balance. I'm Courtney Harrell and this is what we spend, listen to and follow what We Spend An Odyssey Original Podcast available now. Wherever you get your podcasts.

[Sharon McMahon]

This episode of here's Where It Gets Interesting is brought to you by Alloy Women's Health. Listen, Aging is not the most fun thing in the world, right? Most people think at least some aspects of it are kind of crappy. They have brain fog or problems sleeping or weight gain or hot flashes. And you know what? Menopause is inevitable, but it's also treatable. I just found out that almost half of women went three plus years before seeking relief from menopause or perimenopausal symptoms. Why would people do that? Maybe it's because 43% of women reported that their doctors never even mentioned menopause hormone therapy as an option for treatment. Another 40% didn't even know where to go if they needed help. Alloy can help you live your best, healthiest life, offering unlimited access to experts and safe, science backed treatments for your symptoms. Your skin, your hair, your wellness, all delivered to your door. Everything is done online from the comfort of your home or anywhere. No waiting for an appointment or in line at the pharmacy. All you have to do is complete your intake. Their solutions are available by prescription, so you'll need to complete a short medical questionnaire and patient verification and then you design your treatment plan with a physician. You'll work with a menopause trained physician to finalize a personalized treatment plan tailored to your specific needs and then get your three month supply. Join the 95% of women who tried Alloy and saw relief in the first two weeks. Head to myalloid.com interesting and tell them all about your symptoms and you'll get a fully customized treatment plan and $20 off your first order. Head to my a l l o y.com interesting and enter code interesting to get $20 off your first order.

[Vanessa Otero]

I know people are very curious if you have not visited the Advantage Media Bias chart. One of the things that you have done that differs from what other analysis of media bias has done is it's not just how left or right leaning a news source is or a center leaning news source. It also evaluates the news sources for factfulness.

[Sharon McMahon]

What word do you use so we.

[Mike Gallagher]

Use the term reliability reliability very purposefully.

[Vanessa Otero]

This is a point that I think is very important to make, that a news source can be biased but also quite reliable.

[Sharon McMahon]

Yes.

[Vanessa Otero]

And people equate the word bias with lie.

[Mike Gallagher]

Right. And we have to admit that we're all biased. Like even, even things don't necessarily occur to us as bias. Like we have in the United States an English language bias, a generally pro democracy bias, a pro America bias. Right. So those are things that exist, but yeah, we don't necessarily notice them as much if like a lot of people in our communities share that bias. And you'll notice that the way the news sources are plotted on the chart, if you haven't seen it, bias and reliability are highly correlated, but not perfectly correlated. We have a skews left and a skews right category. And there are news outlets that are very high in reliability in both of those categories. And there are news sources that are very low in reliability in both of those categories. It's nothing wrong with advocating for left leaning or right leaning liberal or conservative positions and policies, but how well that argument is supported by facts is a big factor in reliability.

[Vanessa Otero]

The other thing I think a lot of people don't realize about news, I get asked this question literally dozens and dozens of times a day. Well, why aren't you talking about X? Why aren't you talking fill in the blank? Why aren't you talking about the fact that Vanessa's alien? You know what I mean? Whatever the topic is. And I think people sometimes misunderstand what makes something news. News is by definition something new. It's new information. It's not repeating the same information from four weeks ago. Just keep it in the headlines because you.

[Mike Gallagher]

Yeah, and that's something that we tease out in our reliability scale. So when folks go to our website, they'll see that we have eight categories of reliab, which throws people off at first because we're used to thinking about news and like a binary like real news versus fake news or news versus opinion, but it's more nuanced than that. There is really a gradient. And so at the very, very, very top of our scale, like what makes the news like most reliable and most valuable really to you? It's original fact reporting is our top category. And we include in that things that are high effort investigative journalism. So things that are just difficult for us to know on our own, that we have to rely on other journalists like hidden information in documents or information from far away, like being on the ground reporting in Ukraine right now. That's high effort journalism. That's really important, right? So it's bringing us new information. And that's what we put at the very apex of our chart for reliability. Now below that there's a category that's still very good, which is called fact reporting. And what's the difference between original fact reporting and fact reporting? Well, distribution of factual information is also very important. News organizations will syndicate information from other journalists after verifying it. Then below that you have still again, good reliable sources. But they start to mix in some analysis, you know, some relevant context. But up at the top it's who, what, when, where, and just a very, very relevant why. The more you get into why and how, the more it starts to be in that middle section, which is analysis, which is still can be good analysis, but it's not necessarily the same as news. It's like your predictions and like I said earlier, statements of meaning and inferences and conclusions. Then below that you've got opinion, which is less factually supported. And below that you've got all the ways in which news can be problematic. So there's lots of gray areas, areas of news that are just selective or incomplete or propagandistic. And below that you have misleading information. Below that you have inaccurate information. So most of our news landscape falls somewhere in that middle right between this propaganda opinion analysis range. It's not always so cut and dry. You know, truth versus lies. And people want a short answer to it, but it's just. There's not a short answer.

[Vanessa Otero]

Let's talk about how do you determine where a news source falls on this? It kind of looks like a bell curve. How do you determine that? Take us through your process.

[Mike Gallagher]

So we have a team of 35 analysts that are politically balanced, center, right and left. And we've got this team of analysts and we have them self rate on the front end along 20 different political positions on how left and right they are. And then we have some measures on the back end as well to accurately capture how left and right folks are. But usually people are pretty good about assessing their own bias. So we train them in our content analysis methodology, which is based on looking at the actual content itself of the articles and episodes. And what we do is all day, every day, we have these shifts in zoom. You have three people to a zoom, one left, one right, one center. And they have a list of articles that they're going to be going through for that day. Because for every news source we put on there, we get a representative sample of articles or episodes before we Put that on the chart. So if you go to our site and go to our interactive media bias chart and you just type in, in the search bar, New York Times, you'll see all these articles, these hundreds of articles that we've rated for the New York Times. And some are in the middle because they're minimally biased and fact reporting, they're up high. And then some are in the left leaning opinion section because those are left leaning opinion columns. And so the overall score is the average of that.

[Vanessa Otero]

I'm sure you're asked this question all the time, as I am. How am I supposed to stay informed when I look at this and I'm like, well, that's depressing. Yeah, like everybody is just asking questions. What would you recommend for somebody who does not want to be stuck in an echo chamber? They don't want to just have endless confirmation bias reading only things that support their already held opinion. What recommendations do you have for a normal human? Does it have 8 to 10 hours a day to read the news?

[Mike Gallagher]

Good question. So like we make choices about our diet, we want to make choices about our news consumption. So the sources at the top middle of the media bias chart that are most dense with facts, true facts, and less opinion. If you watch the nightly news programs on the major networks like CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS, you can watch a half hour or one hour show and get like 13 stories or go to like AP News or Reuters. Those are at the top middle of the chart. And they really focus. They have journalists all over the world, thousands and thousands of journalists. If you just purposely go to their apps or to their sites, then you're controlling the way that you get the information. Because so many of us get information from either habit or algorithm. So habit is like most people usually will have five different sources of news that they go to over and over every day. At most, sometimes just one or two. Maybe it's like one website where you like the snarky takes, right? That's confirmation bias. But if it's by algorithm, it's just the things you click, you're going to get more of those. So mold your actual habits yourself and you know, go to a highly reliable news source. Limit your consumption per day. It doesn't take more than five or 10 minutes if you get a good newsletter, or half an hour if you watch one of these evening programs to be informed and be well informed and not overwhelmed and like depressed about it. You know, the incentives are aligned to do that. Anybody can create a website and generate some outrage and get some followers and then have that be super engaging on social media and then sell programmatic ads. That system incentivizes the creation of these types of news sources, unfortunately. And like the barrier of entry for creating something like that has gone down and distributing it has gone down. Whereas, you know, it's expensive to have journalists in far flung locations. I mean, this is what's disappointing to me about the major cable news networks is they have a lot of resources. They're on TV all the time, they sell lots of ads all day long. And to increase the margins and viewership, you know, it's attractive and appealing to people to listen to opinions they agree with all day. It's cheaper to have a pundit in studio or just by zoom. And you can have like 6 or 10 or 12 of them on one show. That's cheaper than like flying somebody to Yemen or to Ukraine. And you see the disconnect where like during this war, each of those networks, the cable news networks, has people stationed over there and they're like doing very dangerous work. Two Fox News journalists were killed and one was severely injured in Ukraine. Now that work that those journalists are doing is important, important work delivering that information. So to identify the difference between like an AP that's doing that all the time with their journalists all over the world, or a local news station that, you know, they may only have 15 reporters, but like all 15 go out in the field and go get stories. That's the kind of work in journalism that we want to value, whether it's national or international or local. Not so much the stuff that's a punditry that's cheap and easy to produce.

[Vanessa Otero]

That's one of the reasons I'm not a journalist. I don't identify as a journalist. I don't pretend to be one a journalist is doing original reporting on.

[Mike Gallagher]

Right.

[Vanessa Otero]

They're out there obtaining the information directly from wherever it is a primary source. Yeah, they have to call the mayor's office, they have to get an official statement, they have to look up those documents. That is what the job of a journalist is. I don't do any of that. I will help you understand the news. I will aggregate some of the news for you so you can have a better idea of what's going on. But I'm not a journalist. I'm not out here doing original fact reporting, calling the mayor's office. People underestimate how incredibly important fact based journalism is to a democracy. That this is of truly the highest importance.

[Mike Gallagher]

It is. And you finding information, the information that journalists try to find often is information that's difficult to obtain. It's hidden, you know, I mean it's holding powerful organizations to account. Everyone's got reasons for distrust of institutions and the distrust of institutions is at an all time high according to lots and lots of polls. Institutions include governments and businesses, even social organizations, religious organizations like churches and the media itself. Right. Because sometimes there are bad actors within those organizations and journalists job is to uncover that information and it's very hard to do in our system. If we demand more of that as consumers, we'll get more of that. Right?

[Sharon McMahon]

You know, I've tried a lot of dog foods over the years for my dogs. I have three of them. They're super sweet, but they can be a little picky. Okay, let's be real. One of them can be a little picky. And we have definitely had our share of mealtime standoffs. And that is why I ordered my next round of dog food from Ollie. Ollie delivers clean, fresh nutrition in five delicious flavors made right here in US Kitchens with human grade ingredients. No fillers, no preservatives, just real food. We're talking more energy and shinier coats and it's super easy to get started. Just fill out Ollie's 30 second quiz about your pup and they'll customize a plan just for them. We got a two week supply, a free storage container and a full guide to make the transition smooth. Dogs deserve the best. They really do. And that means fresh, healthy food. Head to ollie.com Sharon tell them about your dog and use code Sharon to get 60% off your welcome kit when you subscribe today. Plus they offer a happiness guarantee on the first box so if you are not completely satisfied, you'll get your money back. That's O l l I e.com Sharon and enter code Sharon to get 60% off your first box. Need contract help for those workload peaks and backlogged projects? You're not alone. Robert half found that 67% of companies surveyed said they will increase their use of contract talent. That's why their recruiters leverage their experience and use award winning AI to quickly find the skilled candidates you want. Learn about their specialized talent in finance, accounting, technology, marketing, legal and administrative support at Robert Half. They know talent. Visit roberthalf.com talent today. Want to give someone a gift that really matters? Give one that won't just last a year, it'll last a lifetime. That's the gift of learning with Masterclass. I think this is a fantastic gift for Mother's day and Father's Day. Your mom and dad probably have all the things they want. And if you're a parent, your house is probably cluttered with a lot of stuff. Do you really need another kitchen towel? Do you need another tie? With Masterclass, you can learn from over 200 of the world's best. Fight disinformation and learn media literacy with renowned scholar Noam Chomsky. Unlock innovations with leading generative AI experts and learn how to think and communicate like a scientist with Neil DeGrasse Tyson. And the best part, Masterclass offers a 30 day money back guarantee. Our listeners always get great discounts on Masterclass. But least 15% off any annual [e-mail] Sharon See Masterclass's latest deal. At least 15% off and give a gift that somebody will actually want this Mother's Day or father's [e-mail] Sharon Media.

[Mike Gallagher]

Organizations say, well, that's what people want. You know, they want the opinion, they want the argument, they want the bias confirming stuff. We're just giving them what they want and it happens to be super profitable for us. But when we can realize the damage that that does to our society, I mean, I don't think people quite connect how damaging it is to have this kind of news landscape where there's so much junk in it. But if you think about how many people out there have a family member or more than one family member, but they don't talk to anymore because they're down a misinformation rabbit hole. I mean, that's a devastating consequence. How many people won't do business with certain companies or with certain people because of how much they're polarized and how much they disagree. Look at how difficult it is for us to pass legislation about anything right now. These are real consequences. And once we realize that they're tied to our media consumption, we can demand as consumers better choices, better journalism. We have to do that with our actions.

[Vanessa Otero]

That's right. We have to stop incentivizing the producers of the junk news. Disincentivize them from doing that by refusing to give them our eyeballs and our time.

[Mike Gallagher]

Right.

[Vanessa Otero]

Corporations speak the language of money. And if they are not making money on what they're doing, then they will be forced to find a different way of doing business.

[Mike Gallagher]

Yeah, and there's another way. We can, you know, vote with our wallets. Look, there are companies now that are starting to become aware of the fact that their ads support misinformation and polarizing junk news. And that's, that's not good. That's not Good for their brand. They may be trying to reach consumers. But if you notice that a company whose products you like is advertising on something that's not reputable or, or something that's attacking and vilifying folks on the other side, you should notice that you should hold that company to account. I mean, there have been advertiser boycotts like, hey, this coffee company is supporting this stuff that's like really way out there and really damaging to society. And people will call them out on Twitter. I think that's important.

[Vanessa Otero]

I recently gave a talk about why we should care about misinformation, why the average person should care, because it is sometimes easier to just be like, well, they're just going to do what they're going to do. There's nothing I can do about it. But one of the reasons that I think it's important that all of us need to care is because our fellow citizens are making decisions that have real world consequences based on this information. People die, people lose their livelihoods. Democracy itself is at risk. These have very, very real societal implications. When people take actions based on bad information, based on junk news, absolutely.

[Mike Gallagher]

You see it happen more and more where it spills out into real life violence. I mean, one of the earlier examples is Pizzagate, but there have been so many incidents that we forget about that fly under the radar that are directly tied to online misinformation. I mean, the biggest example being January 6th insurrection. Right. So like, it's not just that it exists online. You're absolutely right. It's real life decisions and that affects how people interact with each other. The saddest part to me is when people say, how do I reach my family member who just doesn't believe anything that's real.

[Vanessa Otero]

I get asked that question all the time. It's heartbreaking to people.

[Mike Gallagher]

Yeah. And it's an unanswered question, actually. I think that you've probably realized in your work and I've realized in mine, you know, we do the things we do sort of to prevent folks from falling down misinformation rabbit holes and to teach folks how to discern for themselves. But there's the preventative stuff, like how do you reach somebody who's already off the deep end? And I think there aren't a lot of good answers. There's, I think a lot related to addiction psychology and their programs for addiction. And they're like cult deprogramming kind of formats. But being addicted to misinformation, disinformation, fake news, or extreme polarizing content. I think has a lot of parallels with addiction psychology. And, and I think it's an unsolved problem. Like there's no 12 step program for like how to get out of conspiracy theories. I hope that's the next phase of work that folks in our field find tools to actually help people repair their relationships because they have similar effects to. If you're an alcoholic, it affects your job, you might commit a crime, you get estranged from your family. You know, if you hit rock bottom, those are signs that you need to do something about this addiction problem that you have. There's things that we can do to make the world a better place. And it doesn't have to be this way. Where social media is geared to just take advantage of those addictive things like engineer things so that it has the most engagement. It doesn't have to be that way, but we have to demand it. It's not just crazy people that are falling for misinformation. Well educated, successful people can believe completely inaccurate things because the way information is presented to us right now, it's very confusing. We just need to be equipped to deal with it and we can teach people how to do that.

[Vanessa Otero]

Well, I so respect the work that you're doing. I absolutely love your chart. I feel like it is such a useful tool because most of us don't have time to sit and analyze 60 articles from one news source for ourselves to plot where they fall on a curve.

[Mike Gallagher]

Right, Exactly.

[Vanessa Otero]

Most of us don't have time for that. And so even though I completely agree with you that I love that you're equipping people with the tools that they need to be able to make these analyses for themselves, you're also providing resources to people who perhaps don't have the time to do it for themselves. For all of the new sources that they come across. Tell us a little bit more about how, how to find your media bias chart where people might apply this. Like if I just look at it. That's great. But what about people who want to use it, say in a classroom or in a media literacy class at a college level? Can you talk a little bit more about that?

[Mike Gallagher]

Yeah, absolutely. So our site is ad fontesmedia.com a d f o n t e s media m e d I a.com ad fontes is Latin for to the source, because we analyze the source and you can see that we've got our free interactive media bias chart and that's designed for if you just need to look up a source you've never heard of before. We have nearly 2,000 on there now podcast TV shows. Just enter it in a little search bar and it'll pop up and you can search up to five a day on that for free. But folks that want to search more news sources or dive into what we're talking about, like teaching yourself how to analyze this for yourself, we have programs with subscriptions for individuals that give unlimited access and methodology courses, and we have these designed specifically for schools. So what we find in middle schools, high schools, and colleges is that so many instructors and librarians find themselves needing to teach news literacy in this way. Whether it's like they're doing current events and they want to make sure that they're getting current events from a reputable source, or they're writing a paper, English paper in a first year writing class, and all of a sudden somebody citing stuff from something in the bottom corners and the teacher's like, oh, no, we got to take a step back and do a little information literacy. Librarians are especially like, academic librarians are experts in this, but they don't have a lot of instruction time with all the students. Like, not all the students are going to pass through the library. Right. So we provide tools, including our interactive media bias chart, our premium and pro editions, which allow, you know, classroom level access or school wide library wide access. That's unlimited. And it comes with short methodology courses as short as like 18 minutes. And then we have lesson plans and activities that go along. So no matter if you have just a little bit of time or you have a whole semester or a year to teach news literacy by analyzing news content, we have resources for schools, educators, individuals.

[Vanessa Otero]

I have a ton of teachers in my community. You know, as a teacher, I always have a soft spot for other teachers, librarians. So I know that there are a lot of educators listening to this. And the materials and resources you provide are such a massive time savers too. You know, like, librarians definitely are experts on this topic, but how much time do you legitimately have in a day to create all of your own resources? So, yeah, fantastic.

[Mike Gallagher]

Yeah, I mean, you know, it, you know, like how limited your time is, how much you have to squeeze in as a teacher. And if it's just like not squarely within what you're planning on covering, you need something that's easy. And you know, in a world that's like changing so fast, you need these kind of resources.

[Vanessa Otero]

Vanessa, this has been delightful.

[Mike Gallagher]

Love our conversation. We could, I know we could talk for a long time about this stuff, but yeah, I just love it. I love it.

[Vanessa Otero]

Thank you for your important work. I love pointing people to your resources. What you're doing is incredibly valuable.

[Sharon McMahon]

So thank you so much.

[Mike Gallagher]

Thank you. And I love that you have a fleet of govern nerds. We call our folks news nerds just because, you know, it's cool to be a nerd about this really important stuff.

[Vanessa Otero]

I totally agree. Thanks, Vanessa.

[Mike Gallagher]

Thank you, Sharon.

[Sharon McMahon]

Thank you so much for listening to here's where it gets interesting. If you enjoyed today's episode, would you consider sharing or subscribing to this show that helps podcasters out so much? I'm your host and executive producer, Sharon McMahon. Our supervising producer is Melanie Buck Parks and our audio producer is Craig Thompson. We'll see you soon. Today's episode is sponsored by NerdWallet's Smart Money podcast. Making financial decisions shouldn't feel like picking a new streaming show. Too many options, too easy to fall for the hype and you wish you'd done more research before committing. That's why I love NerdWallet's Smart Money podcast. Their finance journalists break down real world money decisions, from investing to home buying to credit cards. With clear research backed insights, the nerds help you cut through misinformation and get straight to the facts. So before you make your next financial move, get the clarity you need to make smart decisions with confidence. Follow Nerd Wallet's Smart Money Podcast on your favorite podcast app.