History Extra Podcast: "Was the Atomic Bomb Necessary to End War with Japan?"

Release Date: August 5, 2025
Host: Eleanor Evans
Guest: Professor Richard Overy, Historian and Author of Reign of Ruin

Introduction

In this thought-provoking episode of the History Extra Podcast, host Eleanor Evans engages in a deep conversation with esteemed historian Professor Richard Overy. The discussion centers around the contentious decision by the United States to deploy atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, a pivotal moment that arguably hastened the end of World War II. Drawing from his latest work, Reign of Ruin, Professor Overy delves into the multifaceted factors that influenced this monumental decision, challenging the conventional narrative surrounding the necessity of the atomic bomb.

1. US Strategic Planning and Conventional Bombing

Professor Overy sets the stage by outlining the United States' long-term strategic planning for a potential conflict with Japan. Dating back to the 1920s, the US Navy had devised plans to circumvent a direct invasion by leveraging aircraft to bomb Japanese cities from the Mariana Islands, located approximately a thousand miles from Japan's mainland.

Professor Richard Overy (02:24): "The Americans had thought for a long time about the possibility of war with Japan and planned to force their way across the Pacific using the US Navy, bombing Japan from nearby islands to potentially avoid an invasion altogether."

2. Shift to Firebombing and General Curtis LeMay's Role

As conventional daylight precision bombing proved ineffective against Japan's fortified cities, the strategy pivoted to incendiary raids aimed at causing widespread firestorms. General Curtis LeMay emerged as a pivotal figure in this transition, advocating for low-altitude bombing to maximize destruction.

Professor Richard Overy (06:19): "As total war becomes more bitter, even democracies are willing to embrace strategies which they would otherwise have rejected before the war."

Under LeMay's command, the American Air Force achieved devastating results, obliterating 60% of Japan's urban areas and causing massive civilian casualties.

3. Moral Considerations and Civilian Casualties

The shift to incendiary bombing marked a significant moral turning point, with strategies deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure. Despite the horrifying impacts—such as "women burned with babies on their backs" (09:18)—there was scant opposition within the American military hierarchy.

Professor Richard Overy (09:42): "There was some sense that the Americans had not been doing this in Europe, but now they were perfectly content to do it in Japan... there was no real voice against the firebombing of Japanese cities."

4. Racial Perspectives in American Strategy

Overy highlights a troubling racial dimension in the American approach to bombing Japan versus Germany. American commanders often dehumanized the Japanese, facilitating a more ruthless application of force.

Professor Richard Overy (11:03): "They thought the Japanese were barbarous, less than human... So you could do to the Japanese things you couldn't do in Europe."

This racialized perception starkly contrasts with the treatment of Germans, even as atrocities like concentration camps were uncovered post-war.

5. British Involvement in Bombing Strategy and Atomic Bomb Development

The British collaboration in developing incendiary bombing techniques and their contribution to the atomic bomb project are often underappreciated. British expertise in urban destruction informed American tactics, and British scientists played a crucial role at Los Alamos.

Professor Richard Overy (12:21): "British scientists... were very enthusiastic about producing a bomb, engineering a bomb. Britain also has a role to play in... not a particularly edifying strategy."

6. Japanese Morale and Leadership Perspectives

Amidst relentless bombing and societal strain, Japanese morale plummeted. However, entrenched military hardliners resisted surrender, fostering internal conflicts within Japan's leadership about ending the war.

Professor Richard Overy (14:21): "Most Japanese... must have known perfectly well that they were on a back foot... military hardliners wanted to fight to the end."

This internal division delayed Japan's willingness to capitulate despite the escalating devastation.

7. The Role of Atomic Bombs in Japan's Surrender

Contrary to popular belief, the atomic bombs did not singularly compel Japan's surrender. Overy argues that a confluence of factors—including the Soviet Union's entry into the war and the cumulative effects of conventional bombing—played more significant roles.

Professor Richard Overy (24:53): "They didn't know what the bomb was... the most important thing... was the news that the Russians were going to declare war on Japan."

The atomic bombs, while symbolically potent, had a more indirect influence on Japan's decision to surrender than traditionally acknowledged.

8. Continued Conventional Bombing and Atomic Bomb Plans

Post-Hiroshima and Nagasaki, conventional bombing continued unabated, further decimating Japanese cities. Moreover, there were plans to deploy additional atomic bombs against seven more cities, underscoring the breadth of the destruction intended.

Professor Richard Overy (30:06): "The last bombing occurred after the Emperor had finally authorized the surrender... plans from the spring of 1945 onwards was to wage nuclear war against Japan... it meant bombs on seven other cities."

9. Post-War Remembrance in the US and Japan

The collective memory of these events diverges significantly between the United States and Japan. In the US, there remains a majority viewpoint justifying the bombings as necessary, though younger generations increasingly question their necessity. Conversely, Japan's remembrance is nuanced, with a strong pacifist movement but official discourse often subdued to foster post-war reconciliation and alliance.

Professor Richard Overy (32:08): "In Japan, public remembrance has been much more subdued... there is an important fraction of Japanese society which is strongly pacifist and strongly anti-nuclear."

Conclusion

Professor Richard Overy's Reign of Ruin offers a nuanced reevaluation of the atomic bombings' role in ending World War II. By contextualizing the decision within broader strategic, moral, and racial frameworks, Overy challenges the simplified narrative that atomic bombs alone compelled Japan's surrender. This episode underscores the complexity of historical events and the myriad factors that influence monumental decisions in wartime.

For more insights and to delve deeper into these historical narratives, subscribe to the History Extra Podcast and explore the full range of episodes available.