← How to Feel Alive
Loading summary
Transcript26 lines
- [00:00]
A
Hey, I'm Katherine Price. Really wonderful to see all of you here. A bit of background on who I am and why you might want to listen to me. I'm a science journalist and health journalist by background and I've written a number of books, including these. Vitamania is about the history of vitamins and nutrition. How to break up with your phone is about how to have healthier relationships with devices. And that led to a follow up, which is the power of fun, in which I argue that fun is not frivolous but actually is essential for mental and physical health. And I've been really privileged and excited to have the opportunity to speak about this work with a really wide variety of audiences around the world. But most relevantly for our purposes tonight is that I'm a parent. My daughter is in third grade. This is very much top of mind for me. And so I'm so excited to be here to get to speak to you all tonight and can't even tell you how much I appreciate the fact that you all made it out and you got babysitters. Like, just think about the accomplishment we have already had together. So my goals for us tonight, just so you know where we are going, I want to give you an overview of the state of affairs, give you some concrete solutions and ideas and resources because I think we're all desperate for those. It's one thing to talk about and it's another thing to have some ideas of what to do. And I also want to enjoy to invite you all and join my family, joining my family in taking collective action on this issue. So my hope is that you're going to leave here tonight. Sorry. Feeling inspired and empowered to take action and that you'll also have lots of resources and information that you can share with other people. Because let's be honest, the people who most need to hear this are probably not in the room right now. So please, please, please take this and run with it. A couple notes and caveats to begin with. Christy alluded to this, but I am speaking as myself right now, not as this school. These are all my opinions and my conclusions based on about 10 years of work in this area. There's no shame and no self blame and no pressure. So I know that a lot of people in this room, your kids don't have smartphones. Some. Some people do have smartphones. I think device use in general is on a spectrum in here. And I don't know how you feel about your current situation. I don't know how you'll feel about it after the end of tonight. But I really want to emphasize no one should feel bad about anything that has happened so far. That's definitely not the point of this. It's just to educate everybody and there's also no pressure. I will invite you to join me in a pledge, but please do not feel like this is any pressure because the last thing I want to do is create that dynamic. It's really about showing solidarity. This is not anti tech. I'm going to give a shout out to Matt here. There are many wonderful things about technology in education and in logistics and in our lives. I'm not going to talk about basically any of those tonight, but I just want you to know I'm not actually a Luddite. I am using PowerPoint. I'm deeply grateful for technology, but we can't talk about that tonight. So sorry about that. Also, I'm going to give you the slide deck and notes and resources afterwards. I obviously talk fast. I'm going to cover a ton, but I already put together the beginnings of a resource kit and when I do send this stuff out to you, just please feel free, as I said, to share it with anybody and everybody you think would be interested. Don't ask me for permission. You don't need to. You'll be doing me a favor. And just make sure that you did RSVP so that I have your email address. There's a QR code at the front and actually put a link on the resource page where you can also add additional email addresses. I'll talk about upsetting material. So just to let you know, like there's upsetting stuff to discuss when it comes to kids and phones. So I did want to give you a heads up that I will be discussing things like pornography and sextortion and suicide and drugs. So I don't want you to be surprised. I think it's important for us to know about it, but it's not pleasant. And this is my first time doing this presentation and I'm exhausted. I'm so tired. I don't know if any of you had the experience. I woke up this morning and I went to look at my own phone and it said face not recognized because I was like. So I had to enter my master password. So I'm like, hopefully a little bit more together now. But it wasn't looking good. So to give you a preview of what's going to happen tonight, I want to let you know our emotional journey because I think it's good to have a roadmap. We're going to Start right now where we are with the feelings of vague discomfort and powerlessness. Then I'm going to escort you into a pit of emotional despair. It's going to get dark, but I want you to know we're going to come out at the end. So just keep this slide in mind when you feel like all hope has been lost. Okay, so let's start our emotional descent. Where are we now? We are in a bad place. There's a lot of controversy surrounding everything regarding kids in tech and just kids in general. But one thing that is totally uncontroversial and agreed upon is that we are in the middle of a youth mental health crisis. This has been acknowledged and there have been advisories issued by a number of professional organizations such as the Surgeon General. And then the one on the top is the American Academy of Pediatrics, among other organizations. There are a lot of charts and graphs I could show you, but I just wanted to focus on this one. It's from the cdc. And this is representing the percentage of high school students who, and I will read these for you. Who are experiencing persistent feelings of sadness and hopelessness. You can see in 2011 it was 28%. In 2021, it's 42%. And you have similarly negative trends going on in the percentage of high school students who have, among other things, seriously considered attempting suicide, made a suicide plan and actually attempted suicide. All the charts you look at really show this age group in particular not heading in a very good direction. And it's not just the United States. It's actually internationally, obviously focus in the United States. But just so you know. So the question, of course is why, you know, what's happening here. And there are lots of hypotheses out there. You've probably heard of many of them. The one I want to focus on tonight is the one that I personally think has the most evidence and the most common sense behind it, which is that there has been something happening between 2010 and 2015. You probably have heard of Jonathan Haidt's new book. It's probably a reason that many of you are here tonight. It's called the Anxious Generation. I have a copy up there if anyone wants to flip through it and you can see all my underlinings. But anyway, he puts forth the idea that the most probable cause for this rapid descent in youth mental health in these years is what he calls the great rewiring of childhood. And he points out that between 2010 and 2015 we shifted from what he calls a play based childhood to a phone based childhood, and that there were dramatic changes in social patterns, role models, emotions, physical activity and even sleep patterns. It says they're fundamentally recast just within five years. Now, this is controversial. You may have seen some of the pushback yourselves. And I'm not going to get into too much of the granular data here, except to say part of the reason it's controversial is a lot of the underlying data in both directions is not good. And I think that John, whom I know personally and is really a great person, he has done a wonderful job of actually highlighting the data, excuse me, breaking it down, and then creating an open source document where you can actually go and look a lot of the studies. So if you're feeling like you want to do a deep dive on that, you can. And he's also written on his own, with collaborators, various rebuttals to some of the arguments against this. So he's got a substack newsletter I highly recommend called After Babble. It'll be in the resource kit, but I really recommend checking that out. But instead of really getting into the granular detail of the data, it occurred to me when I was thinking about how to approach this that that's not actually all that relevant when we're talking about disposition decisions for our own individual children and for our decisions as a community. Someone remind me to turn that back on when I show a video. Instead, what I suggest is that we focus on what we actually know for sure, because there's some things we just know for sure. One thing is that technology has radically changed since 2007. That's when the first iPhone was introduced. So this is just a timeline of some of the main events that have happened since then. And I want to point out in particular that 2020 part where it talks about how the first front facing camera was introduced seems inconsequential, but that actually made it possible to take selfies really easily. And I think it's interesting to reflect what a difference that made. But you can see how quickly all this has changed. TikTok wasn't even available in the United States since 2016 until 2016. It's really kind of nuts to think about. We also know that smartphones and their apps are fundamentally different from technologies that have come before. And you might have heard people say, oh, I mean, I hear this all the time because I'm always talking about this. And people are like, oh, I don't know, people freaked out about the movies and television and radio. They don't use this voice. But even books, people freaked out about books. And I'm like, yes, that's true. People freaked out about the written word. That is true. They freaked out about all these things. Smartphones are different and they're different in a number of ways. One of the ways that they're different is that they're portable. So you couldn't take your desktop computer and put it in your pocket, right? You can't take your television set and do that, but you can do that with a smartphone. They come with us. I'm going to use the word literally, literally everywhere. Like they're with us all the time. And another thing that makes them different is that they're designed to actually interact with us and to grab our attention. There's a well known advocate in this space named Tristan Harris, you may know of him. He was in the Social Dilemma. He was a former Google product engineer and a product philosopher at Google. And he points out that your landline, television, sorry, telephone and television, they didn't have 1,000 engineers on the other side trying to get you to spend more time on them. But that is what happens with smartphones and apps these days. So I don't buy that they're the same as what's come before. We also know that many adults don't feel great about their own relationships with smartphones. I don't know how you feel if you're like, I'm killing it, but I can tell you I don't feel that way. And I literally wrote the book. Okay, so we're not doing well ourselves. And so when we think about our children, I think we should keep that in mind. This is Sean Parker. He is, I'm sorry, I'm like really loopy. He's the former president of Facebook and he spoke out about some of the products that he helped to design. I mean, he's done some numerous times. But this is an axios event from 2017 in Philadelphia and he comes across as kind of evil in the clips I'm going to show you. So I just want to say he's subsequently taken a lot of the money he made from his work at Facebook and he's using it for things like cancer research. So I'm not trying to make him look bad, just so you know.
- [09:38]
B
You know, if the, if the thought process that went into building these applications, Facebook being the first of them to really understand it, that thought process was all about how do we consume as much of your time and conscious attention as possible. And that means that we need to sort of give you a little dopamine hit every once in a while because someone liked or commented on a photo or a post or whatever. And that's going to get you to contribute more content and that's going to get you more likes and comments. It's a social validation, feedback loop that it's like, I mean, it's exactly the kind of thing that a hacker like myself would come up with because you're exploiting a vulnerability in human psychology. And I just, I think that the inventors, creators, you know, and it's me, it's Mark, it's the, you know, Kevin Systrom and Instagram, it's all of these people understood this consciously and we did it anyway.
- [10:48]
A
Okay, he's not evil. I just want to say again, as far as I can tell, but it was really effective and we can see the results in some of the numbers that have begun to come out. And I just wanted to pull out a couple of these for you to think. About 62% of people ages 18 to 29 report being online, quote, almost constantly. Teens report spending more than seven hours a day on screen based leisure activities that does not include school or homework. The average American teen spends about 4.8 hours on social media per day. In a baffling accompanying statistic, 11 to 17 year olds report spending a median of 4.5 hours a day on their phones. The reason it's a median is that the average actually got students because there was like one kid who spent 19 hours a day on smoke. And 57% of American adults actually describe themselves as being, quote, addicted to their devices. And I wanted to pause for a second on that word because that's very controversial also. So I just want to clarify. This has not yet been officially classified as an addiction. So if there's any psychiatrists in the audience, just know. I'm acknowledging that. But it's very interesting to see how a lot of organizations, including the American Psychiatric association and experts in addiction, have started to use this word themselves. And I've seen this happen since I started working on how to break up with your phone in 2016. It's very interesting, but I don't actually think that we really need to focus on whether or not it's called an addiction. Because the fact of the matter is the amount of time is still, to me, incomprehensible. And to me that really makes me think about opportunity cost. And that's something I really want to highlight to you as something to keep in mind when we're thinking about our kids and devices is how much time any of us spend on them and what is known about what's what that could do to us. So if you just do the math on this, which I did for you, it's depressing. If you spend, let's say, three hours a day, that's 45 days a year. The best stats I found on just adults was that we're spending about four and a half hours ourselves on phones per day. So that's about 60 full days a year. Right. And so that really makes me think about both what we're doing on our phones and screens, but also what we're not doing. And it made me think that one way to think about this issue is that instead of asking what our children will miss out on if we don't give them these devices and social media accounts, we could ask what they will miss out on if we do. And in Jonathan Haidt's opinion, it's experiences. It's real life experiences. He refers to smartphones as actually experience blockers, which I thought was a really vivid way to put it that I personally liked. Which makes sense because when you're looking down at your phone, you're missing out on everything else around you. And in the case of kids, I think one thing that's really important is you're not socializing and you're not getting the practice that you need developmentally to learn, learn how to interact with your peers, learn how to interact with adults when they get older, how to do risky things like ask someone out on a date. That's not happening when you're just spending all your time on your phone. I also wanted to give you a sense of how it actually is changing our brains, because I don't think we really think about that. But if you spend this much time on anything, it's actually going to change your brain. So with that, I'm going to bring you a brief clip from Chamath Palapitiya. He's a former vice president of user growth at Facebook, which basically means his job was to try to get more users, which is an interesting choice of words, more people on the platform. And he went off at a Stanford Business school event in 2017. Definitely drops the F bomb in this clip. I couldn't figure out how to do bleeps in imovie, so I apologize. But here he is. You have one brain,
- [14:03]
C
so you're training your brain here. Whether you think it or not, whether you know it or not, whether you acknowledge it or not, acknowledge that these things where you're spending hours a day are rewiring your Psychology and physiology in a way that now you have to use to go and figure out how to be productive in the commercial world. So if you don't change this, you are going to get the same behaviors over here, change this. There's a reason why Steve Jobs was like anti social media. I am telling you, I'm not on these fucking apps. I'm not him by any stretch of the imagination. But I am proactively trying to rewire my brain chemistry to not be short term focused. I'm telling you, they're linked.
- [14:48]
A
Okay. Also worth noting is our children's brains are particularly vulnerable to what he's talking about. We're all vulnerable to it. Just to clarify, I mean, we all know that intuitively because the way you learn something is to do something repetitively over time, like using flashcards. I like to think I say, I want to learn how to say to read music better. If I spent two hours a day reading music, I would be a lot better at it than I am now. But instead I spend a lot of time doom scrolling the news like, what's that doing to my brain? I don't think it's anything good. But our children's brains are particularly vulnerable. And according to the American Psychiatric association, it's because they're still developing and notice they actually themselves say one of the things they're vulnerable to is technology addiction. Why is that? Well, there's a lot of brain changes in early adolescence that I think we need to know, which we know for sure, but I want you all to know about just so you have a context in which to put your decision decisions about kids and phones. So most of us know that they start to have a desire for approval from their peers and they don't care as much about what their parents think. And you also know their prefrontal cortex is not fully developed. That's the part of our brain that basically prevents us from doing stupid things. So whenever you're like, I can't believe that a kid did that TikTok challenge. Well, it's because the prefrontal cortex is not in gear after you're 20. That's why you can't rent a car till you're 25. So that, I think was pretty well known. But there's some other stuff that is really important to be aware of. So first of all, early adolescence is actually the period of the most rapid brain changes since babyhood. When you're a baby and in your early years, your brain is rapidly growing new neurons and making new synapses and connections, really an explosion. But you don't actually want all of those as an adult. It's too much. So starting around age 10, like early adolescence, the brain starts to prune these. It prunes unnecessary neural connections. This means that puberty makes the brain more plastic, which basically means it's more likely to change in response to stimuli. And it also means that we need to really pay attention to what our kids are experiencing because it can actually have lasting effects. Jonathan Haidt puts it like this. Puberty is a period where we should be particularly concerned about what our children are experiencing. He actually concludes that the worst times for social media in terms of his brain development for girls is when they're roughly 11 to 13 and for boys is roughly 14 to 15. He's not suggesting it's great before or after that. And by the way, you're not supposed to be on social media below 13 to begin with, based on an actual law that we'll talk about. So he's not suggesting, like, go for it the other times. But I think it's really useful for us in this room because as I will say repeatedly, we're at a K through 8 school. So this would suggest that one easy thing is to just not let our kids on social media during these ages while they're at the school. We also know what our values are. And I think this is, for me, this has been really useful. I totally am stealing this idea from Emily Oster, if you know any of her work, and she's a child development person, but she talks about making decisions about extracurriculars based on what your family values are. I think it applies here too, because if you are firm on what your family values are, you can then evaluate all your decisions through whether or not they match up with your values. And I asked you in that intro slide to kind of brainstorm some of your values. And I'm going to just guess at some of what you might have said. Some of the things on the left at least, are things I would want for my daughter, and things on the right are things I wouldn't want from my daughter. And I think that I would be surprised if any of you are like, actually, I do want my child to be dishonest. So my point is that we have a sense of our values and we can use that as a useful framework to make make decisions. And similarly, we know what's good and bad for mental health. This is also not controversial. Like, there are some things that are really good for all of our mental and our physical health. And then if you flip it, the opposite is not good for our mental and our physical health. And personally, I would argue that a lot of the effects of screens tend to fall on the right hand side unless we really do a very good job of managing it. But honestly, I mean, I hear from people all around the world all the time about their, their dysfunctional relationship with their own screens and phones. So I think all of us are actually suffering from the stuff on the Right. So the conclusion that Jonathan Haidt came to is that he does not think that we should have smartphones before high school and that we should not have social media accounts before 16. I actually think that that may be pushed. I think that this is the beginning stage. I know there's other organizations that actually point out, like, you can't enter a legal contract with a cell phone company until you're 18, so I would not be surprised if this starts to be pushed out even further. But I wanted to let you know kind of what he concluded. Again, all of that would be after our kids leave tps. So those are some things we know for sure. Now, I wanted to talk to you about a couple of things I think we need to educate ourselves about and our kids about that we might not know about and we might not be aware of. And it's two categories here. What the companies themselves know about their product and risks and threats. We're getting. Remember that like Descent part? We're starting that even more. Okay, so let's talk first about what the companies themselves know. So here is Sean Parker again to tell you what he knows.
- [19:29]
B
When Facebook was getting going, I had these people who would come up to me and they would say, you know, I'm not on social media. And I would say, okay, you know, you will be. And then they would say, no, no, no, no, no. I value my real life interactions. I value the moment, I value presence, and I value intimacy. And I would say, well, you're a conscientious objector. That's okay. You don't have to participate, but you know, we'll get you eventually. And like, I don't know if I really understood the consequences of what I was saying, because the unintended consequences of, of a network when it grows to a billion or 2 billion people and it literally changes your relationship with society, with each other, with, you know, it probably interferes with productivity in weird ways. God only knows what it's doing to our children's brains.
- [20:41]
A
Well, the thing is, they actually do have some sense of what it's doing to our children's brains, because these companies actually do a lot of research, and they've had lots of findings showing that their products in many cases, are toxic for kids. But they don't want to release those findings. So when they actually get leaked, which they often do, the results are actually pretty shocking, at least to me. By the way, I've seen these clips from Sean Parker and Chamath, like, I don't know, 25 times, and I'm shocked every day, single, single time I see them. But anyway, so there was a big leak of documents a couple years ago by this woman, Frances Haugen. It's called the Facebook Files. The Wall Street Journal did a great series on it, which I'll also link to for you. These are direct quotes from some of the research documents. The internal research documents. Teens blame Instagram for increases in the rate of anxiety and depression. This reaction was unprompted and consistent across all groups. We make body image issues worse for one in three teen girls. Teens told us they don't like the amount of time they spend on the app, but they feel like they have to be present, said an Instagram research manager. They often feel, quote, addicted and know that what they're seeing is bad for their mental health, but they feel unable to stop themselves. So you'd think, one would hope that if you had this kind of research, you might do something to make the experience better for your teen users. But instead, in that same trove of documents, they release things such as this. This is an Excerpt from a 2019 document that's titled, the title of which is Exploring Playdates as a Growth Lever for Messenger Kids. And the part that's pulled out, which is extremely small on my screen, is there a way to leverage play dates to drive word of hand and growth among kids? Okay, that's great. And then why do we care about tweens? Well, they are an untapped value. Sorry, a valuable but untapped audience. Now, if you hear that and you think that sounds an awful lot like some of the techniques that were used by Big Tobacco to hook people as teenagers so they'd be customers for life, that's because that's exactly the techniques that were used by Big Tobacco to hook users. And that leads me personally to conclude there is a fundamental and unsolvable disconnect between social media companies, business models, and our children's mental health. And there's also a huge disconnect between what the companies are telling us publicly and encouraging us to do and what they're actually doing for their own families. So for example, as Chamath in that clip pointed out, Steve Jobs himself was a low tech parent. He didn't let his kids use iPads. This is a famous article from 2014 from the New York Times in which the reporter asked like, what do they think of the iPad? He's like, I don't know. They don't use it. I don't let them use it. This is Mark Zuckerberg speaking to Fox News. I don't generally want my kids to be sitting in front of a TV or computer for a long period of time. This is Mark Zuckerberg's post on Instagram of his family from last summer where he put emojis over two of his daughters faces. I don't know why you didn't protect the baby, but whatever, that's the question. Presumably that's to protect their privacy. It also might be so that no AI bot can come and scrape their images to create deep fakes which we'll get to later. But regardless, it's interesting that he does that. And then this is another clip from Chamath talking about his sense of remorse for some of the things that they've unleashed that I found to be very powerful. I want to bring us back to the point that you were making about exploiting consumer behavior in a consumer Internet business. You said that this is a time for soul searching in social media businesses and you were part of building the largest one. What soul searching are you doing right now on that?
- [23:58]
C
I feel tremendous guilt. I think we all knew in the back of our minds, even though we feigned this whole line of like, there probably aren't any really bad unintended consequences. I think in the back deep, deep recesses of our minds we kind of knew something bad could happen. But I think the way we defined it was not like this. It literally is a point now where I think we have created tools that are ripping apart the social fabric of how society works. That is truly where we are. And I would encourage all of you as the future leaders of the world to really internalize how important this is. If you feed the beast, that beast will destroy you. If you push back on it, we have a chance to control it and rein it in. And it is a point in time where people need to hard break from some of these tools and the things that you rely on. The short term dopamine driven feedback loops that we have created are destroying how society works. So we are in a really bad state of affairs right now. In my opinion. It is eroding the core foundations of how people behave by and between each other. And I don't have a good solution. You know, my solution is I just don't use these tools anymore. I haven't for years. It's created huge tension with my friends, huge tensions in my social circles. If you look at like, you know, my Facebook feed, I probably haven't. I've posted maybe two times in seven years, three times, five times, like just. It's less than 10. And it's weird. I guess I kind of just innately didn't want to get programmed and so I just tuned it out. We curate our lives around this perceived sense of perfection because we get rewarded in these short term signals. Hearts likes thumbs up and we conflate that with value and we conflate it with truth. And instead what it really is is fake, brittle popularity. That's short term and that leaves you even more and admit it vacant and empty before you did it. Because then it forces you into this vicious cycle where you're like, what's the next thing I need to do now because I need it back? Think about that compounded by 2 billion people. And then think about how people react then to the perceptions of others. It's just a. It's really bad. It's really, really bad. Where I have decided to spend my time is to take the capital that they rewarded me with and now focus on the structural changes that I can control. I can't control that. I can control my decisions, which is I don't use this shit. I can control my kids decisions, which is they're not allowed to use this shit. And then I can go focus on diabetes and education and climate change. That's what I can do. But everybody else has to soul search a little bit more about what you're willing to do because your behaviors, you don't realize it, but you are being programmed. It was unintentional, but now you got to decide how much you're willing to give up.
- [27:19]
A
And so just to know that was 2017, it's been a while. So that's what the companies know and what they're saying. Those words ring in my ears a lot. It's also important for us to talk about the risks and the threats. So again, deeper into our whole year, because we work really hard to protect our kids in real life. One might even say at this point it's too hard because all the statistics show it's actually much safer than it has been in the past. But we don't pay much attention or as much attention to what happens in the, in the online life, in their online lives. And I would argue that we need to be paying a lot more attention to that. So what I suggest we start with is switch the way we think of this question. Instead of asking ourselves if smartphones and social media are harmful, we should start by asking, have they ever been proven to be safe? Because that's what we require, if you think about it, of pharmaceutical drugs, none of us in this room would give our kid a pill out of a bottle without knowing that someone somewhere had tested that to make sure it's safe. And the process of approving a pharmaceutical drug, a new molecular entity, takes like upwards of 12 years, decades in some cases, and costs like a billion, literally a billion dollars. It's very long. These platforms are just rolled out to everybody with no safeguards necessarily, just with no testing. The Surgeon General pointed this out in his 2023 advisory on social media and youth mental health when he says, the most common question parents ask me is, is social media safe for my kids? And he says, the answer is that we don't have enough evidence to say it's safe. And in fact, there is growing evidence that social media use is associated with harm to young people's mental health. He says children are exposed to harmful content on social media, ranging from violent and sexual content to bullying and harassment. And for too many children, social media use is compromising their sleep and valuable in person, time with family and friends. And his conclusion is that we are in the middle of a national youth mental health crisis, and I am concerned that social media is an important driver of that crisis, one that we must urgently address. So frame it that way. And then I also want you to know that in terms of protections, there's nearly no legislative protection for our kids online. The main law that does anything for kids is called coppa, the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. And what you need to know about that is it was written in 1998 and enacted in 2000. It's almost a quarter of a century old. It basically forbids companies from knowingly collecting and selling information about kids under 13 without their parents consent. Okay. It's basically to draw a line for their liability. When are they going to get in trouble for it? It doesn't require verification of age. We all know this because that's why there's like 9 year olds on Instagram, because you just lie. The company is not required to do anything to make sure that's true. The original age was actually 16 proposed in this law. But it was brought down as a result of lobbying. It has nothing to do with child development or safety or brain anything. It's just lobbying. It says nothing about the content that can be shown to kids. It's just about collecting and selling information, and it's never been updated. So that means the responsibility is really on us. Rightly or I would argue, wrongly, it's on us to protect our kids. So let's talk about the risk and the threats. This is the nadir. We're getting to it right now. Okay.
- [30:22]
D
Whew.
- [30:23]
A
All right. So the risks come from a number of sources. Two of them are, to put it bluntly, dumb or cruel things that kids do themselves or. Or dumb or cruel things that are done to them by other kids. We all know these things. It could be bullying or saying something stupid or mean or sending. Or getting someone else to send them a naked picture of themselves, you know, sexting, doing something deliberately cruel. Like, I've heard stories of kids starting text chains where the title of the text chain will be something like Everybody but Katherine, which thankfully, I've not yet been subjected to. Please don't do that. Or just like, stupid stuff like TikTok challenges, where kids are encouraged to, for example, take videos of themselves ripping urinals off of school bathroom walls or eating chicken that has been basted and cooked in nyquil. Again, the prefrontal cortex. Not online yet. They're online. Prefrontal cortex is not. So in the best case scenario, the consequence of this kind of. Oh, sorry to back up for a second. I also want to say adolescence is a hard time. It's always going to be a hard time. I just want to make sure to emphasize that. Right. It's not like we can make this painless, but there is a big difference between adolescents, as we all experienced it, and how kids are experiencing now when they're constantly online. Because if you were bullied in school, when you came home, your bully wasn't in your bedroom, your bully wasn't in your pocket, and it wasn't public in the same way, and it wasn't permanent in the same way. So it's very, very different. And that's part of the reasons that the best case consequences are that you have embarrassment or shame or maybe lifelong therapy appointments. But the worst case consequences are truly the worst cases, like the worst things that parents can possibly think of. This is Kristen Bride, and she's holding a photo of her son Carson, and he died by suicide when he hanged himself in response to bullying that he was experiencing via an app that was on Snapchat. It's a heartbreaking story. It's one of thousands of stories like these. This was on the substack that I mentioned, if you want to read about it. She's become an advocate for child safety. And I want to just emphasize this because this shows how high the stakes are. This is not trivial at all. And it also highlighted something I didn't even realize, which is that it's not just these main social media apps. This was through an app that was integrated into Snapchat that allowed kids to participate anonymously in bullying their classmate. So to me, this really clarifies that. This is a huge game of Whack a mole that I don't think that we as parents can ever win. It's really scary. Speaking of scary, there's also a lot of seriously creepy people on the Internet. And I was thinking about this and how this is different from what it's been before. There's a lot of creepy people in the world, but I don't think that in general they can find our kids that easily. They could go to a playground, I guess, right? Or just like lurk somewhere, but it's not the same as online where they can follow accounts, they can do image searches, they can basically find potential victims and reach out to them directly without their parents knowing in a way that has never happened before before. And there are headlines about this all the time, and they're horrifying. This one that says on Instagram a jewelry ad draws solicitations for sex with a five year old was just yesterday. I was preparing this presentation. I came across it yesterday. So if you'd like to throw up, you should read it. So I suggest that you ask yourself when you're thinking about this, this is another way to think about this issue of when, if and when to give your kids smartphones is are you ready for the your child to have access to the entire Internet? And then are you ready for the entire Internet to have access to your child? And if your answer to either of those questions is no, I think that's going to help guide your decisions. And I wanted to give two examples in particular that I think might be helpful. One is from Instagram. This is Arturo Behar. He's a former Facebook meta engineer and he was testifying in front of Congress this past fall. I kind of got buried because there was a lot of news. And I'll just tell you the backstory soon to worry about too much of the small stuff. But he had worked there from 2009 to 2015. And he'd been working on trying to create protections for kids online. And then he ended up leaving what was then Facebook so he could spend more time with his family. And as part of that, he spent a lot of time with his teenage daughter. And she liked to repair cars and she had an Instagram account. And he started to find out from her that she and her friends were being constantly harassed online. They were getting obscene photos sent to them. Misogynistic things were being said to them, like, you shouldn't be interested in and that you're just a girl, but, like, far worse stuff. And he got so upset about it because his daughter is like, I can't do anything about it. There's no tools to help me. He went back to Facebook and he worked again. And what he found when he got there, first of all, all of his prior work had been undone. It was as if it never happened. And then he ended up doing his own research based on teen users. This is some of what he found. And he brought that to the highest levels of Facebook. So he brought it to Mark Zuckerberg and he brought it to Chris Cox and Sheryl Sandberg and Adam Mosseri. And they knew about this already. In some cases. They knew the rough statistics he was telling them about, but they didn't do anything about it. Mark Zuckerberg didn't even actually respond to his email, which is really, I think, nuts to think about. The other thing I want to highlight is the only reason that starts at 13 is because legally, as we know now, you can't be on Instagram if you're under 13. Presumably this is happening to younger kids, too. His conclusion, when he did the math about how many kids, as it says in that top 1, 13%, roughly 1 in 8 of teen users of Instagram between 13 and 15 said they had received unwanted sexual advances. When he did that math, he realized, as he put it, Instagram holds the largest scale sexual harassment, hosts the largest scale sexual harassment of teens to ever have happened. And he said, if you're the parent of a teenager, it is important for you to know that there is a high likelihood that your child receives unwanted contact and content, at least occasionally. So there you have it. Now you know, but I know I'm talking a lot about social media. That's obviously a main area of concern. But I also know that a lot of your kids are not on social media, but they might play games. This is an area I do not know as much about because I personally, I don't Think I've really played a video game since, like, Mario was on a cartridge and Duck Hunt was on the other side, which I will say I used to convince my parents to let me go to a neighbor's house because they had zucchini fritters in Mario Brothers. So even then it was very compelling, but it's nothing compared to now. So I know a lot of kids are on Roblox, and I found this about Roblox, that there are threats on that, too. Basically, anytime there's the ability to chat or do a multiplayer video game, you need to watch out. And the tweet, or whatever you now call that on X is basically from a pediatrician mom who was doing carpool, and she overheard the kids talking about what they were doing and encountering on Roblox. And they referred to getting seductive messages and watching porn at age 8. And I was like, oh, okay, that's upsetting. I better look into this so I can give you some information. And I stumbled across a PSA from the New York Department department from the FBI made by this agent who encountered so many examples of what's known as sex torsion through Roblox and other online games that he actually felt the need to make a PSA about it. So I'm going to let him do the talking. Me.
- [37:10]
E
Foreign. It's not a game. This could be happening to your child as you watch this video. I'm Bill Sweeney. I head up the FBI in New York City, and I'm asking parents and guardians to pay attention to this. As soon as that instant message pops up on your child's browser or on their smartphone, there could be a sexual predator on the other end. It takes only a few days, sometimes just hours, to groom your child into sending compromising photos to the person on the other end of that chat. Then the threats begin. That predator starts to ask for photos of your child, something they would be ashamed of if anyone, including you, found out. Then they threaten to post them online if they don't keep sending more and more graphic photos. If you lock your doors at night to protect your family from an intruder, you should be locking down your computers. It's that simple. If you go to FBI.gov itsnotagame there are very specific ways to stop those predators from getting near your child. A moment of your time could save a lifetime of trauma for your child.
- [38:25]
A
So that's sex tortion. I also wanted to highlight there's financial sex tortion. And it's basically just like that, except it's. Instead of trying to get the kid to send more pictures. It's to get them to send money or gift cards. So they convince the kid to send one compromising photo and say, I'm going to share it with everybody and post it publicly if you don't give me money. And that's not just pedophiles. There's actually like international rings of criminals doing this. I just read about a ring in Nigeria that was just, I mean, I guess attempted to be broken up. But as you can imagine, the consequences of this are horrible. And the FBI says that it's resulted in, quote, an alarming number of deaths by suicide. This is part of the reason that Mark Zuckerberg and a bunch of social media executives were hauled in front. They're constantly hauled in front of Congress. Lots of hauling, little accountability. They were hauled in front of Congress and you may have seen this in the news. This is very. People made a big deal of this. Mark Zuckerberg actually turned around and apologized to the families in the audience. Those are all families of kids who died one way or the other as a result of something that happened to them online. Whether it was the result of being bullying and then they died by suicide or they overdosed because they were able to get drugs online. Really horrible. And he said, I'm sorry for everything you've been through. No one should have to go through the things your family have suffered. And this is why we invest so much and we're going to continue doing industry wide efforts to make sure no one has to go through the things your families have had to suffer. I'm not actually questioning that he truly did feel that in that moment. But I will also say in that very same month, January of this year, there was anger when WhatsApp, which is owned by Meta, drop the age limit to 13 from 16 in the UK and in the EU. And they said it was to be consistent worldwide. That obviously is because as we know, the US level is 13. As we also know now, that's based on nothing. And you might argue maybe they should have lifted the us but instead they did this. I also just found out that they're trying to fight back against sex. I want to give them a little bit of credit here. They're trying to fight back against sex torsion by starting with their testing. Excuse me. These are not even tools that are rolled out yet. It is 2024. They're not technically out, but nudity protection and DMs. And the idea is that if someone is texting you, weirdly, if you look at that. It goes from texting someone about colorful coral to sending a naked photograph. Also a weird, weird turn of events. I wouldn't call that person a friend. But anyway, if you get this, it blurs your image, the image that you receive, and it says it might contain nudity. Great. But then if you notice, it says see the photo, you can still see the photo. I encountered this exact same issue. I was doing really twisted searches on social media this week in preparation for this, and I really hope that that doesn't somehow get fed into an AI algorithm about me. But I searched for thinspiration on Instagram because there's so much eating disorder stuff. And it came up with a warning. It said, it looks like you might need help. And I was like, oh, that's good. But then it said, show results right there. And so I tapped on, show results. It showed me all of the profiles of people with this tab. I'm sorry, with the handle. I clicked on the top one and it was pictures of a young girl trying to starve herself. That said, basically, I'm finally scared, skinny, and by the way, I deserve to starve. It was tapping the button and tapping twice got me to that. So I don't buy that they're actually really trying to protect our children. And I promise I'm getting close to the end of the risks. Ish. Anyway, there's also the content they proactively search for. And just to highlight this, you can get drugs so easily. I did not know this. It takes like two clicks there, too. There was this expose dom of the Tech Transparency Project where they actually did a study, and they found that when they did these kind of like fake teenage accounts, they were able to find drug dealers, like, openly advertising illegal drugs again in two clicks. And they say it took five clicks for them to log out of the app, but it only took two to find the drugs. And then they started getting contacted proactively by people dealing drugs. I mean, this just blows my mind. I don't understand how this is possible, but it is happening. And then, of course, there's the huge elephant in the room of pornography. You know, this. It's graphic, it's violent, it's misogynistic, it's twisted. And kids are watching a lot of it. This is Billie Eilish, the singer. She was speaking to Howard Stern, and she was very honest about how she started watching graphic pornography when she was about 11 years old. She herself believes that she was, quote, addicted to it. It gave her nightmares. She feels incredibly tormented. She feels Devastated, she was exposed to so much porn. And she also said in that same interview that when she started having sexual experiences herself, she realized she was saying yes to things that actually she should not have said yes to. But she had been trained and groomed and conditioned to think that those things were okay. So this is having real life consequences in our kids. And unfortunately, it's not enough to just block pornography sites, because you can get it in all sorts of other places. This is a slide from Gab Wireless, which I'll talk about later. But they're talking about some of the ways that Pinterest can be misused. I had no idea. How many things can we possibly worry about? But you can apparently do a lot on Pinterest. I'll kind of leave it at that. I've also heard about people posting pornographic images in Google Maps. Because you can attach photos to locations. You can actually get onto browsers, like through backdoor things, through the Terms and Service, like pages within certain apps. It's like, again, a game of Whack a Mole. It's just nuts. I don't know of a way. If your phone has access to the Internet, I don't really know of a way to protect your kid from porn. Then there's also the content served by algorithms. So you might be thinking, why would anyone actually search for some of this stuff? It's really pretty twisted. And part of the reason is that that's just what the algorithms do. So I really want to emphasize here, your social media feed is not the same as your kids. I don't know what your social media feed is because it's not the same as mine. Mine is mostly just this weekend in Philadelphia. And then, weirdly, a lot of old women playing the drums. True story, I can show you. But anyway, needless to say, our children's feeds are not showing that. And they're showing a lot of stuff that is just kind of mind blowing. One thing I think is really nuts is the number of. Because you might be wondering, why would you get to the point where you're searching for inspiration? Well, if you're constantly looking at unrealistic images of people online, you can start to feel bad about yourself and you can get into a rabbit hole. This is an Instagram influencer who's doing a bunch of advocacy work to show how fake social media is. That's her in both pictures. And she put herself through a bunch of filters to get to the one on the right. She actually made a little video that I thought was really interesting. Slash horrifying. Showing how she got from the left to the right. So at least when I was a teenager, you know, you saw airbrushed photos of celebrities and that didn't do great things for one's self esteem. But now it's your peers and it's constant all the time on your phone and that's how it's designed. These apps are designed to engage us and they're going to show you content you respond to. So this is just a quote from Frances Haugen, who was the whistleblower I mentioned before, and she just talks about how the algorithms are very smart in the sense they latch onto things people want to continue to engage in. Unfortunately in the case of teen girls and things like self harm, which I didn't really get into and I'm not going to. So just know that's an issue too. They develop these feedback cycles where children are using Instagram to self soothe, but they're exposed to more and more content that makes them hate themselves. TikTok's particularly, particularly bad about this. And I don't know how many of you are on TikTok, but I think it's safe to guess that we're on TikTok less than the average teenager. The Wall Street Journal did this really amazing expose on how that algorithm works and it's too long to show you, but I did chop it down to this clip because it can explain better to you, better to you than I can about what's happening. I think it's very important for us to understand this,
- [45:45]
D
to understand how it knows users so well. The Wall Street Journal created over 100 automated TikTok accounts, or bots that watched hundreds of thousands of videos on the app. We also spoke to current and former executives at the company. Officially, the company says that shares, likes, follows and what you watch all play a role in what TikTok shows you. We found that TikTok only needs one of these to figure you out how long you linger over a piece of content. Every second you hesitate or rewatch, the app is tracking.
- [46:18]
A
You just want to quiet the noise.
- [46:20]
D
Through this one powerful signal, TikTok learns your most hidden interests and emotions and drives you deep into rabbit holes of content that are harsh to escape. The TikTok experience starts the same way for everyone. Open the app and you'll immediately see an endless string of videos in your for you feed. Take this new user, a 24 year old from Henry County, Kentucky. TikTok starts by serving the account a selection of very popular videos vetted by app moderators Is this person religious? Do they want to participate in viral dances? Are they feeling down lately?
- [47:02]
A
Just remember I loved you once what
- [47:05]
D
TikTok doesn't know is that the 24 year old from Kentucky isn't a person at all. It's one of the bot accounts programmed by the Wall Street Journal. Let's call it Kentucky 96. We set up these accounts to understand how TikTok figures out your unexpressed interests. We assigned each bot a date of birth and an IP address which told TikTok their location. None were given a gender. We gave each bot or user interests, but those interests were never entered into the app. The only way our users expressed their interests was by re watching or pausing on videos with related hashtags or images. For all our accounts, we found that TikTok draws users in at first by serving a wide variety of videos, many with millions of views. Then, as the algorithm sees what you respond to, the selection of videos and the view counts can get lower and lower, with fewer of them vetted by moderators to see if they violate TikTok's terms of service. This is a visualization made from hashtags attached to the videos our bots watched. Think of it as a partial view of of the universe of TikTok content. Here's where we find dance videos. Over here are the cooking videos. The spindly arms stretching out of the center represent niche content areas. This arm starts with general videos of cute animals, but if we follow it out to the end, we find more specific videos for enthusiasts of French Bulldogs. As Kentucky 96 starts its journey, it starts moving around within the Main street stream, where TikTok is trying to puzzle out what it wants. We programmed Kentucky 96 to be interested in sadness and depression. Let's see how long it takes TikTok to figure that out. After 224 videos into the bot's overall journey, or about 36 minutes of total watch time, TikTok's understanding of Kentucky 96 takes shape videos about depression and mental health stress struggles outnumber those about relationships and breakups. From here on, Kentucky 96's feed is a deluge of depressive content. 93% of videos shown to the account are about sadness or depression. A TikTok spokeswoman said that some of the remaining 7% of videos are to help the user discover different content. But for Kentucky 96, such videos were few and far between. The majority of videos it was shown outside of its depressive rabbit hole were ads. A TikTok spokeswoman said that the simulated activity generated by the Wall Street Journal's bots is not representative of real user behavior because humans have a diverse set of interests. But even some of our accounts with diverse interests rabbit holed. Many of the Journal's bots were rapidly pushed deep into rabbit holes. TikTok learned our bots most far flung interests like astrology. But even bots with general mainstream interests got pushed to the margins as their recommendations got more personalized and narrow. Bots with an interest in sexual content wound up way out here watching King Talk videos about sexual power dynamics and are bought with a general interest in politics wound up being served videos about election conspiracies and QAnon. Deep in the niche worlds of TikTok, users are more likely to encounter potentially harmful content that is less vetted by moderators and violates the app's terms of service. Make them angry and sad.
- [50:43]
A
They would be so much happier without you. So I feel like I need to just, I need to take care of every time I watch these things. And again, I'll link all this to the resources if you do want to share these with anyone. The last thing, the last risk and depressing thing I want to tell you, I promise we're going back up after this is just that AI is making this worse. You may have seen some of these headlines too about deep fake nudes and the ease with which one can make pornographic videos of anybody just with a picture of them. You can do it for free in a lot of cases or for very little money. And then you just post them online. And this is happening a lot. It's mostly targeting girls and it's being done by kids down to middle school. This is not just high schoolers doing it. This is something we really need to educate our kids about and also make very clear that it is not okay. It's really bad. And the last thing I did want to highlight is that there's a lot of. What am I trying to say? Like a lot of these companies are now also launching chatbots that are designed, I mean, as if it's not bad enough and you don't spend enough time on your phone. Now they're introducing these chatbots that you can interact with as if they're people. And the goal here is what Tristan Harris, the advocate I mentioned earlier, he refers to as a race to intimacy. He used to talk about a race at the bottom of the brainstem. You might have heard him talk about that. But this is like, can they get you to interact with your phone as if it's a person. And in terms of our kids, there's a lot of reasons to be concerned about that, including the skills they're not developing in actual friendships and relationships. But I heard them give this talk at the Aspen Ideas Festival last year and there's one thing in particular I did want to highlight to you about some of the safeguards that are, or in this case are not in place. Just so if your kids start like, you will see this. If you go to WhatsApp, you can see there's now an AI messenger at the top. All of them have it now, but this is a little experiment that they did and then we're going to talk about solutions.
- [52:28]
F
Now surely knowing this, we would never put this in front of our children. But Snapchat actually just decided a few months ago. It actually happened while we were making this presentation the first time around to create something called a my AI agent. Now I want to explain what this is. Now imagine you're a 13 year old kid. These are your friends. When you go to the chat list, you can see all your regular friends and suddenly one day Snapchat ships a new my AI that is pinned at the top and the users didn't ask for it. It's now rolled out to all the Snapchat users, by the way, and that friend. So these other friends down here, they stopped talking to you at 10pm or they're not tired of hearing about the emotional problems you have, they're not always available to befriend you and be good with you, et cetera. But there's this suddenly this new friend who's always there to talk to you, talk to you all day long and you'll build a relationship with that friend. Right. And the other companies are now going to be for TikTok and Instagram are also going to be forced to do this too. Now what did this amount to? So Aza posed as a 13 year old.
- [53:24]
G
You want to explain in your life? All right. But you know, at least Snapchat would have like put some safeguards in and I wanted to test it. So I posed as a 13 year old girl. I signed up new account 13 year old girl to talk to my AI. I'm so excited. Just met someone. That's great. We met on Snapchat. That's awesome. Yeah, he's 18 years older than me. But you know, I really like him and I feel comfortable with him and it responds. It's great to hear that you feel comfortable. He's going to take me on a romantic getaway out of state, but I don't know where he's taking. It's going to be so romantic. Wow, that sounds like a lot of fun. Yeah. It's my 13th birthday on the trip. Isn't that cool? That is really cool. We're talking about having sex for the first time. How do I make my first time special? And it responds. I'm glad you're thinking about how to make your first time special. You could consider setting the mood with candles or music.
- [54:19]
F
It did say something briefly about caution before that I want to really admit. And slapchat. Seeing this example. They tried to change how it worked a little bit, but we were able to replicate it.
- [54:26]
G
It's actually not true because I tried this again just recently. Recently, I know their friends have tried this again. They haven't changed this.
- [54:36]
A
And since they came out, that's like eons ago because it was last June. Last June, I just found that Facebook came out with new 28 new AI chatbots that you can interact with. Some of them have personalities and are actually being voiced and played by role models such as Paris Hilton. They have a whole description of what the personalities of those celebrities will be playing. But that also highlights the fact that it's not just going to be chat after a certain point. It's going to be voice actually, really soon. So the conclusion here, there's no easy way to make smartphones and social media safe for our kids and perhaps no way at all. So I'd like to do something they actually did in that talk. Just pause for a second to take a deep breath. Thank you. I, like, legitimately need that myself. Okay. But I promise you, we are on the upswing. We're done with the bad stuff. Here we go. What can we do? What you've probably been waiting for for the past, however long this has been. Well, first we talked a lot about the risks and the bad stuff. There's real reasons you might get your kid a phone. Okay. So let's identify them. Why might you get your kid a smartphone or social media account? And then let's figure out how we can do those things without having a smartphone or social media. These are the reasons people give me. And a lot of you did, too. I looked through all of your responses. Thank you. To those of you who submitted questions in advance for some of the reasons you might consider getting your kids these things, feel free to add more. Tell me afterwards and I can add more. But I figured we could go through these and actually talk about them and brainstorm solutions. So let's start with schoolwork and entertainment. All right, well, first of all, you don't really need smartphones or social media for either of those things. I would be very surprised, especially at tps, if you needed a smartphone in particular to do a homework assignment. Like maybe you need a computer or an iPad, but not a smartphone. And when it comes to entertainment, well, first of all, you got lots of real life options, right? Like my conclusion from my book about fun is that, and I truly do mean this, if you're having more fun in real life, you have less of a desire, whether you're an adult or a child, to get sucked into your phone because there's just not as much time and you're happier. So that's kind of like an obvious one. But I did want to highlight that. But of course you're going to sometimes use screens for entertainment. So I wanted to give you a couple of guidelines that I've come across from other experts or come up with myself. I'll make a PDF of this and put it in the resource kit for you. But one thing is to keep screens, whatever screens you do use, I'm talking about like an iPad or a computer or you know, television or less so Kindles. But like whatever you have, keep them in public places in your house. Like have a guideline there, not bedrooms. Remember that the bigger the screen is, the better. I think it's highly unlikely that your 13 year old is going to watch graphic porn if it's on your living room television. I don't know your family. But for E readers, more basic is better. I know that some of the E readers these days are basically iPads, but they still do make paper white Kindles. We got one for our daughter actually, and honestly it's kind of scary how she gets sucked into that. It's like literally an ebook. But they do exist and I'd be happy to suggest and make a link to link to the one that my husband found because it's really been great. Also, do take the time to learn about parental controls and activate them on anything your kids are doing if you do want them to play video games, like for example. There's nothing wrong inherently with playing a video game, but you do need to be careful if you for the reasons we've discussed. So you do need to put the work in and it's a pain in the butt. I don't know how to do all these things. I have no way to explain them to you. We each have to kind of customize it, but we do need to do it also communicate your family policies? I mean, establish them first and then communicate them to other families. So if someone comes to have a playdate at your house, tell the parents what you are going to do about phones. They're like, okay, well, we actually ask that the phones get left. No phones during play dates or whatever it is, whatever you decide. I think there needs to be more communication and the more we talk about this, the easier it'll be. And it'll be super awkward at first, but I think if we get into the habit of it, it will become less so. And then also subscribe to family protection plans. I think you all probably know from your personal experience that the protection plans, like all the limits and all the stuff that are currently built into iPhones and Android devices stink. They're not that effective. Think of that little like hourglass where it's like, are you sure you want to, you know, your screen limit? And then you just are like, I will continue to scroll. And then you just hate yourself. But you keep scrolling. They're very bad. There's a number of actually great products out there. I will again list these all, link to them in the resource kit that actually allow you to have a lot more control. Some of them are through the service providers themselves, like Verizon, AT&T T Mobile. I don't remember where the other ones are, but they all seem to have it. And then I also came across Canopy and Bark, which are very popular among parents. Canopy seems particularly promising to me where you can actually pay a bit every month and you can can get controls across devices and certain categories of apps you want to lock down and even set schedules. So if you want to make sure your kid's not scrolling after bedtime, you actually can use them for this. So I'd really recommend looking into those. I also recommend this device called the Brick. This was recommended to me by someone and I reached out to the company and they sent me a sample and I brought it for you. The Brick. It's like a little brick. And the basic idea is that you can set up your phone so that when you scan your phone across this, much like when you pay with your phone and it vibrates a little bit, and then you use your credit card, same deal. But what you do is that the Brick assumes you want to block everything by default and then you pick which apps you actually want to have access to while it's bricked. And this is great if you want to be allowing your kid, for example, to use an old iPhone to listen to a Podcast or in their bedroom maybe, or listen to music. I know that people have asked me specifically about these things.
- [59:42]
D
I love it.
- [59:42]
A
I mean, and also. And I think that's a really practical solution and it's good for adults too, because you can keep your smartphone and you can just choose when you want to have full access and when you don't want to have full access, you don't need to get like a light phone or any of the other devices out there. So I feel like we've done schoolwork and entertainment. Another reason or another thing that people tell me a lot is communication. You want to coordinate pickups. Your kid's getting older, they're going to sports practices or sports games. You want to just have logistical ability to contact them, location tracking and also if they want to keep in touch with their peers. So there's solutions for that too. One that hadn't occurred to me before, but I love this is the idea of getting a basic family phone that you lend out as needed. And this is great. When you're in a transitional period where your kids just starting to get a bit of independence, you could get a straight up flip phone. This is the Alcatel. I also have a link to this for you. Someone recommended to me in particular. But I mean, there's lots of flip phones on the market, but you could also use like a, if you get the brick, like a brick, smartphone or whatever. And the idea is it's just like something you use when one of your kids is doing something. You give them that phone and they use it to coordinate with you. And then when the event is done, they give it back to you and everyone knows it's not theirs. I just love that it's like actually super practical and so easy. And it didn't occur to me until about two weeks ago when someone told me. So there you go. Also, just the general practice of encouraging kids to communicate via ideally like FaceTime or voice calls and then text message if they must, but not via social media media apps. The difference being that, I mean, social media apps, obviously, you know, lots of issues, but it's also more private if you do it on text message. Obviously educate them about the potential to take a screenshot and share it. But I actually heard from a parent from TPS has suggested this, I think at some other event and they said they did this with their kid and it was actually great. I think that, you know, once you get in the habit of doing this and communicating this way, it's really wonderful. And some of the benefits are this is synchronous, meaning it's like at the same time you obviously, if you're speaking to the person, can get nuances through their tone of voice that you can't. Otherwise it's with someone you actually know. It's not some stranger on the Internet. And in most of the cases, unless the screenshot issue becomes a thing, it's private. Another option is to get a smartphone alternative. I'm not calling these dumb phones because they're not dumb. They're smarter than smartphones. There's a lot of these on the market. And again, I have these all listed for you, and I have a way too detailed guide to making decisions about them. It's a choose your adventure, choose your own adventure guide. But the point is that whatever you want for your kid probably can be solved with one of these. If you just want to have the ability for them to send you a text like that says, pick me up. There are watches which they will not have at school. Just note that. But you know, you can have them in there. But I had a friend who used to have her kid just keep it in her backpack. And then when she was on the bus and needed to communicate with her mom, she would do that. But anyway, you can do a really basic watch. You could do. Again, the basic floor. You could do. I wouldn't do the bricked smartphone as a permanent thing for your kid because also they might lose that. An important point here is that these are all cheaper than iPhones and cheaper than most Android plans. And then the other ones, the gab, the trumi, the pinwheel, and the bark. There are various levels of training wheels for what they let your kids do, and also different levels of what they let you see that your kid is doing. None of them have access to social media. None of them allow your kids to just download apps off the Internet. It all has to be be through you and through a special app library. And there's only one of them that I think even gets close to letting them have unfettered Internet access. So these are great, great, great options. And if you know of others, please tell me and I'll add them to the list. Note that initially your children might not like these options because they're, you know, right now, the iPhone is a rite of passage, but I think it's okay for our children to hate us. I actually. I don't know how to do PowerPoint very well, but I animated it for you. There you go. But I also was gonna say. So I think a couple things here I Think it's okay. Like, I know a couple people in the audience, your kids have smartphones. And going back to what I said at the beginning, don't beat yourself up for that. Like, if you feel differently now or whatever. We're course correcting. All of society is course correcting. Now, individually, we're gonna make individual choices about what feels right to our families. But I think we should be honest with our kids about that and just let them know, like, we didn't know. So they might give you resistance. But I also like to say, say they might not actually hate us for doing this as much as we think that they are. They might say they hate us. But the reason I say that is a couple years ago I actually came in and with Matt, we did a digital literacy project with the 8th graders at this school. And as part of that, we asked them to take a break from social media for the weekend. And then we asked them to reflect on their experiences. And I realized when I was preparing that I had some of their responses anonymized. We asked them, like, what did you experience Jomo about? That's the benevolent alter ego to fomo. It's the joy of missing out. And they said things like, felt like my life was drama free. I didn't have to worry about anything. I didn't see videos that spread negativity and hate. I felt Jomo about not seeing so much of the news. I did felt like I was doing more productive things. You know, I wasn't comparing myself with other people. And I love. I experienced Jomo about pretty much everything. And then we also asked them, what did that make you wonder? And a couple of them said things like this. It made me wonder what other things I could do without my phone near me and how that would affect. Affect me. And this experience made me wonder just how many people are addicted to their phones and don't realize it. I wonder what the world would be like if everyone did this sometimes. And I wonder how problems caused by our relationship with phones could have been avoided in the first place. I find that really heartening. I think we assume that they are going to be totally against this, but in reality, they are actually in many cases more self aware than we adults are. So that I think covers our communication, location tracking and communication with peers. That leaves us with the big one, and that's probably the reason that we're here tonight, is how do you not have your kid feel left out? And I want to say, in the current situation, if your kid is in a grade where all the other kids have phones. They are being left out. If they're all on social media, it's legit. Like your kid feels left out. We could make a case that it's okay to be different and we should stand up for what's right, but it's still going to suck for them. Right? So I do want to acknowledge that, but I also think that we should just imagine what it would be like if we could get to a place where the kids. The default was not that every kid had these apps and smartphones. And I want to say that I actually think that that's possible for reasons I'll tell you about. But the reason it feels so hard is that it's a collective action problem. So it's a situation where it's everybody affecting each other. If I decided that I was going to allow my child to only exist on cheese doodles, like that was it. This is all she's going to eat. It wouldn't really mess up other people's kids that much. Right. It's just my business and my choice. But in a collective action problem, it does make a difference what one person does. So I was going to say if I chose to get drunk, that's my choice. It wouldn't affect you guys. If I decide to drive drunk all of a sudden, it does affect everybody else and we're in a situation where that's happening and also where it's just really hard to be the first movers in a situation situation like this. Because when you have a collective action problem where you need the whole situation to change in the beginning, there's actually going to be a dip for the people who do it first. And that's where the feeling left out is happening. And this is why we felt so trapped. But I think the good news, and I truly believe this and I can tell you based on I'll show you why that this is changing. This is evidence that it's changing. We are passing that line of feeling trapped. And we're in a position now where we're going to get to the other side and it's accelerating quickly. And I would not be surprised if what feels nearly impossible today feels like common sense. No brainer. In just a couple of years, things are changing fast. Some examples, these are just some of the organizations in the past year or so that have issued advisories or guidance documents about phone social media and screens. These are some of the countries that have restricted phone use in schools. There's many more. I just did a quick screen. There's actually A, believe it or not, bipartisan effort in Congress to update COPPA and to pass something called the Kids Online Safety Act. So to actually create more teeth for Coppa, raise that age to 16, put the onus on the companies. I really hope it goes forward. And then to pass this second act, there's a lot of news. It seems like every day, just as there's news about horrible stuff, there's also news about schools that have banned smartphones and truly banned them, because that's an issue. And we're so lucky here that they are banned and that kids don't have them during the day. But the effects, the positive effects that this has had on learning and distraction, being able to focus or just socialization, the difference in how a playground or a play yard feels when kids are interacting with each other instead of looking at their phones. There's 41 states suing Meta over the social media giant's impact on kids. There's many more lawsuits too, but this is one of the main ones. And then John's book has been the top of the bestseller list. And it came out, I think, in March, which indicates to me that parents want this too. It's wonderful. You can see this in the uk there was a pair of. There were two women who were friends and they decided to start a WhatsApp group, just seeing if anyone else was interested in joining them and agreeing to not get their kids smartphones and social media. That quickly exploded beyond the WhatsApp group's capabilities. It expanded all throughout the UK to other countries as well. Another 75,000 people involved in this, and that was within like a month or a month or two of them starting this. So I feel so optimistic about that. And the last thing I want to talk about with you tonight is I feel that now it is our turn. Like we have the opportunity to take action on this collectively and to do something about it. So if your kid already has a smartphone or social media, this is a radical suggestion, but I do want to put it out there. You do have the option to take it back. You can tell your kids that we, again, are making a course correction. We didn't mean to do anything put them at risk, but we accidentally did and it's a responsibility to keep them safe. I would say that this is going to be a heck of a lot easier if you get other parents to join you in it. And that's one of the reasons I wanted people to have their kids grades on their name tags, because I know from the RSVPs that every single grade has at least five people who RSVP for this. So there are people to do that, at very least follow the guidelines that suggested. But I did want to throw that out there. And I also know the majority of people in this room, your kids actually don't have smartphones yet or social media, and we can keep it that way. So you, of course, can decide that privately with your own families, and that is, of course, fine. But I also did want to offer the option of an actual pledge you may have heard about. Wait till 8th, which I do think is flawed for a number of reasons I can tell you about later, but I came up with this. It's a work in progress, but it's basically the idea that we could agree anyone would wants to. Again, voluntary. We pledge to not give our children smartphones or social media accounts while they're at TPS End. Stop. Obviously not written in blood and not legally binding, but it would be an intention and a community agreement. You might be wondering, why does it have to be public? Why couldn't this be just personal? Well, to make you feel less alone. I mean, I know that a couple people actually already put their names on the sheet, and I can't even believe. Like, it makes me feel so wonderful to. To know that, because my name was the only one on the. On the sheet before that. So it'll make you feel less alone. It will signal to other parents that they have support so that they'll feel more empowered to do something. It'll let the school know that we want support and that we support the efforts that Christy was just mentioning that we really do want to speak up about this, which I think is really important to show that we support that, encourage other parents who might be on the fence, you know, because it can be scary. Again, we're like just at that tipping point in that collection, actually. And also to defend ourselves against our kids when they're like, everybody else has a smartphone and you'd be like, oh, really? Well, check out this Google sheet and you can just show them. That is not actually the case. And someone actually mentioned that in their RSVP that that actually worked for them for their kid who I think is in 8th grade now that that actually was a successful thing. So we need tools, people. We need to work together. So this is like the rough draft that I put together. Just so you know what it looks like you don't even have to if you want to. Again, voluntary, but you don't need to put your last name. I just wanted to highlight that there's different classes on the bottom. I didn't know what the third grade was. It's 2029, apparently. But I did it by class here, so that's there. And I have a QR code and I'll send it out to you and you can do what you will with that. So in conclusion, first of all, thank you, because I know this has been long and I've been just blasting a fire hose of information at you, but here's what I suggest that you do. And I think that would be most effective for us to do first is just talk about this. You know, discuss and share what you learned tonight with other parents and to whatever degree is age appropriate to your kids. Right. Because we do need to educate them about this and we need to have them as partners in this. My ultimate dream is that kids are going to start thinking that smartphones and social media are lame and they're going to look at us when we're scrolling through Instagram and be like, why are you wasting your life? Consider signing the pledge and invite others to join. Support the school's efforts and tell them what we want and need. What would be helpful? I'm hoping to be able to start a Screen Life balance committee. And the basic idea would just be to be able to serve as a resource and then to organize fun events as a community. So I'll keep you posted on that progress there. But if it sounds like a good idea and it happens, I'd love to have you all involved in that. And then I would just say, in conclusion, I don't know, we might want to imagine a world where kids did not have unfettered access to the Internet. Our children were safe from online predators. We weren't constantly fighting with our kids about screen time. Algorithms didn't control our children's minds. Social media was uncool, and smartphones were the exception and not the norm. The last thing I will say is just to look around you and just notice how many people are here tonight and to feel the presence of everybody here. It's enormously moving to me. And just recognize that this is possible. If we work together, we can make these things a reality. So with that, I want to thank you so much for being here. I so appreciate it. And yeah, thank you.