Matter of Opinion: Don’t Be Fooled, ‘Trump Is a Weak President’
Podcast Information
- Title: Matter of Opinion
- Host/Author: New York Times Opinion
- Description: Thoughts, aloud. Hosted by Michelle Cottle, Ross Douthat, and Carlos Lozada. Every Friday, from New York Times Opinion.
- Episode: Don’t Be Fooled, ‘Trump Is a Weak President’
- Release Date: February 14, 2025
Introduction and Context
In this gripping episode of Matter of Opinion, hosts Michelle Cottle and Carlos Lozada explore the contentious assertion that former President Donald Trump is perceived as a "weak president." Joining them are esteemed opinion writers Jamelle Bouie and David French, who delve deep into the mechanics of what some are calling a constitutional crisis triggered by Trump's administration. The discussion is set against a backdrop of headlines declaring Trump’s actions as a constitutional upheaval, prompting listeners to question the robustness of America's 230-year-old constitutional framework.
Is America in a Constitutional Crisis?
The conversation kicks off with David French highlighting alarming headlines from major news outlets that label Trump’s actions as precipitating a constitutional crisis. He provocatively declares, “constitutional crisis is in the air in our politics,” [00:38] setting the stage for an in-depth analysis.
Defining the Constitutional Crisis
Jamelle Bouie offers a nuanced perspective, emphasizing that the crisis stems from an attempt to “unbind the presidency entirely” rather than merely strengthening it within the constitutional order. He asserts, “Trump seems to really be asserting that he is actually, in the presidency, sovereign over the entire government,” [04:28], highlighting a fundamental threat to the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution.
Trump’s Constitutional Revolution
Carlos Lozada elaborates on what he describes as Trump’s “constitutional revolution,” comparing it to the mythical Hydra with multiple heads. [02:46] He explains that Trump’s actions—from altering birthright citizenship to ending DEI programs—are different facets of a broader strategy to centralize presidential power, effectively subjugating other branches of government.
Congress’s Complicity and Decline
Michelle Cottle expresses her dismay at Congress's apparent willingness to acquiesce to Trump’s overreaches, citing Senator Mike Lee of Utah as a prime example. [06:00] She laments, “I am completely disappointed in what is happening,” [07:20], pointing out how historical figures like Lee have shifted from advocating for constitutional checks to supporting presidential overreach for partisan gains.
David French echoes this sentiment, noting the "abdication of Congress's role" [07:20], and observes that Trump has bypassed legislative channels entirely, opting instead for executive orders that undermine congressional authority.
The Role of the Courts
The discussion shifts to the judiciary's potential to mitigate the crisis. French contends that while the Supreme Court has resisted many of Trump's MAGA-driven arguments, systemic issues remain. [19:36] Carlos Lozada concurs, stating, “courts cannot save us,” [19:42] because real change necessitates compliance and broader systemic reforms beyond judicial interventions.
Trump’s Presidential Weakness
Jamelle Bouie introduces an intriguing argument: despite Trump’s aggressive political maneuvers, he is, in fact, a "weak president." [10:45] He cites President Trump's inability to broker congressional deals or engage in compromise, referencing Neustadt's Presidential Power and highlighting Trump’s reliance on executive orders as a sign of his limited persuasive capabilities.
Historical Context and Structural Flaws
Bouie further contextualizes the crisis by comparing it to Montesquieu’s concept of separation of powers, arguing that the modern political environment—with heavily gerrymandered districts and extreme partisanship—has eroded the foundational checks and balances. [17:26] He uses an analogy likening the constitutional system to an ill patient needing urgent care, emphasizing that the current situation is a critical condition exacerbated by structural neglect.
Potential Remedies and Constitutional Reforms
As the conversation progresses, Bouie and Lozada explore possible solutions to the burgeoning crisis. Bouie suggests that meaningful constitutional reform must acknowledge the reality of partisan politics, possibly necessitating partisan initiatives for change. [29:09] Lozada proposes several reforms, including:
- Easier Constitutional Amendments: Simplifying the amendment process to allow for more responsive and adaptable governance.
- Expanding the House of Representatives: Diluting the effects of gerrymandering and reducing polarization by increasing the number of congressional districts.
- Restricting Presidential Pardons: Redistributing the pardon power to prevent executive overreach.
- Clarifying Commander-in-Chief Powers: Defining the limits and responsibilities of the President’s military authority to prevent abuse.
Bouie adds the importance of holding the President criminally liable for actions taken in office, aiming to establish stronger legal accountability mechanisms. [38:25]
The Path Forward
The panel concludes by acknowledging the complexity of implementing such reforms in a deeply polarized political landscape. French reflects on the enduring tension within the Constitution, noting that while presidential overreach is not new, Trump's multifaceted approach represents an extreme challenge that requires both immediate and long-term strategies to preserve the constitutional order.
Notable Quotes
- David French [00:38]: “constitutional crisis is in the air in our politics.”
- Jamelle Bouie [04:28]: “Trump seems to really be asserting that he is actually, in the presidency, sovereign over the entire government.”
- Carlos Lozada [02:46]: “Trump’s move to radically remake the presidency in the constitutional order… all of these different heads are advancing different aspects of a very similar kind of underlying legal idea.”
- Michelle Cottle [06:00]: “I am completely disappointed in what is happening.”
- Jamelle Bouie [10:45]: “Trump is a weak president.”
- Carlos Lozada [19:42]: “courts cannot save us.”
Conclusion
This episode of Matter of Opinion provides a compelling analysis of the alleged constitutional crisis precipitated by Donald Trump’s approach to executive power. Through incisive discussions, the panelists dissect the interplay between the presidency, Congress, and the judiciary, ultimately advocating for substantial constitutional reforms to restore balance and safeguard democratic governance. For listeners seeking a deep dive into the complexities of American constitutionalism and the current political turmoil, this episode offers invaluable insights and thought-provoking perspectives.
Subscribe and Listen
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.