Podcast Summary:

Interesting Times with Ross Douthat

Episode: Where Does the Transgender Rights Movement Go From Here?
Date: December 4, 2025
Host: Ross Douthat
Guest: Chase Strangio, attorney and transgender rights activist

Episode Overview

This episode of Interesting Times with Ross Douthat undertakes a deep, direct and at times personal conversation about the current crossroads of transgender rights in the U.S., focusing on the movement's legal strategies, recent Supreme Court cases, the shifting dynamics of American public opinion, and the complexity of controversy surrounding youth medical care and sports participation. Ross Douthat and guest Chase Strangio — one of the most prominent transgender rights lawyers in the country — seek both common ground and open, substantive disagreement over questions likely to define the debate for years to come.

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Bostock v. Clayton County (2019)

• Overview: Consolidated cases asking if Title VII of the Civil Rights Act covers discrimination against LGBT employees.
• Chase Strangio: "It is sex discrimination to fire someone for being gay or to fire someone for being transgender." (03:21)
• The Supreme Court (6-3) ruled that Title VII's ban on sex discrimination covers gay and transgender people, with Justice Gorsuch writing the decision and Chief Justice Roberts in the majority.
• The legal strategy was a straightforward textualist argument: regardless of Congress's intentions in 1964, the text covers the firings in question. (04:00)

United States v. Scarmetti (2025)

• Overview: Challenge to Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors.
• Chase Strangio: “The law prohibits puberty blockers and hormone therapies only when they're prescribed to treat gender dysphoria in transgender adolescents.” (09:30)
• The legal claims: the ban violates equal protection (as sex discrimination) and infringes upon parents' right to direct medical care for their children.
• Supreme Court ruled against the plaintiffs, deciding the law was a classification based on medical use, not sex.
• Ross Douthat: “Do you feel like... the political context of these decisions changed?" (18:12)
• Strangio: Yes; shift from issues involving adults to those involving minors has had a strong impact on public and judicial attitudes.

2. Legal Strategy, Backlash, and Movement Choices

• Strategic Dilemmas: Strangio describes the hard choices activists faced in taking these cases forward, noting it was not a personal decision alone but a collective one (20:28).
• Risk vs. Reward: Given circuit splits and increasing laws targeting trans youth, the movement felt it had no choice but to seek definitive Supreme Court guidance despite substantial risk (20:28).
• Lower courts had issued sweeping rulings against trans rights; Supreme Court decision, though a loss, was narrower and left advocacy avenues open (22:29).
• Ongoing legal questions remain about the scope of rights in contexts beyond employment, such as education and housing (23:12).

3. Definitions and Philosophical Tensions

Transgender Identity

• Definition: “A transgender person is someone with a gender identity, so their core understanding of their gender, that differs from the sex that they were designated at birth.” (23:47)
• Sex Assigned at Birth: Usually determined by genital inspection, but also has facets such as chromosomes, hormones, secondary characteristics; Strangio includes self-understanding as a component (24:07).
• Is Gender Identity Biological? Strangio acknowledges possible biological underpinnings but sees it as distinct from traditional markers of biological sex (25:30).

Transgender Identity as a Legal Category

• Strangio: “Legal prohibitions on sex discrimination include transgender people, full stop.” (27:35)
• Shift in law: the specific term "biological sex" has entered statutes in recent years as a move to restrict trans rights; previously, "sex" was less tightly defined (28:40).

Transgenderism: Medical Condition or Protected Identity?

• Strangio rejects reducing transgender experience to only a psychological disturbance, but also acknowledges real distress and the role of medical care (“aligning one's outward appearance with [one's] understanding of themselves.”) (34:06)
• The lack of a perfect legal or philosophical analogy (e.g. with race or religion) remains a source of tension.

4. Personal Narratives and Medical Care for Youth

• Strangio shares a detailed, personal account of coming to terms with gender identity, struggles with body alienation, therapeutic interventions, and how transition enabled fuller participation in life and career.
  • “...it felt like coming home. It felt like resolving a longstanding period of homesickness and then finally getting into your own bed.” (39:30)
• Douthat draws a contrast between broader American acceptance of adult transition/personal autonomy and the newer controversies around medical intervention for adolescents—especially in the context of an explosion of transgender identification among teens and the irreversibility of certain interventions (42:59, 45:03).
• Strangio: Emphasizes that very few trans-identified youth ever receive medical care, that gatekeeping exists at many levels, and that many trans children have persistent, consistent identities dating from a young age (49:35).

5. Gatekeeping, Regulation, and Ban vs. Oversight Models

• On Medical Oversight: Strangio supports safeguards, informed consent, and evaluations before any intervention, but argues against outright bans, favoring regulatory strategies (e.g., West Virginia’s oversight law) (52:53).
• On Malpractice and Overreach: Acknowledges that, as in other fields, medical errors can occur, but blanket bans are an overreaction compared to normal legislative interventions in medical practice (53:05).

6. European Policy Comparisons and U.S. Backlash

• Douthat notes that recent Republican legislation is not out of sync with increasing regulation/skepticism in Europe (54:07).
• Both agree the U.S. legislative response includes elements of backlash and political overreach, partly provoked by what many saw as maximalist positions taken by some trans advocates in prior years (67:49).

7. The Science and Politics of Youth Detransition/Desistance

• Douthat alleges that the movement often labeled concerns about the permanence of childhood transgender identification as "transphobic."
• Strangio: “I am very hesitant to announce things as transphobic without having an opportunity to try to have conversations.” (55:45)
• He welcomes more open, less adversarial conversation, and draws a line between persistent, consistent gender identity and transient gender nonconformity (56:38).
• Argues focus should be on upholding family and patient autonomy as much as possible within the law.

8. Sports and the Question of Fairness

• Sex-Segregated Sports: Strangio supports the general principle: “Yes, I am in favor of sex separated sports in most circumstances.” (61:32)
• Sees both history and fairness in women’s sports, but rejects categorical bans on trans participation at all levels and ages.
• Proposes that [for trans girls] “you have to undergo hormone therapy for a period of time that is studied for the age group, and then at that point you can participate.” (66:23)
• Argues that blanket exclusions are overbroad, especially for those who transition before puberty (who do not have a male hormonal profile), and raises concerns about bodily policing in women’s sports (67:49).
• Douthat pushes back: compromise now is only being offered because maximalist policy has provoked a backlash.

9. Coexistence, Debate, and Emotional Stakes

• Douthat asks bluntly whether skepticism or outright critique of youth transition is itself a form of psychological violence against trans youth, as movement rhetoric has sometimes suggested (72:00).
• Strangio: “I certainly don't think your position should be ruled out of bounds... I would like to persuade you… I don't feel profoundly threatened by it.” (74:17)
• But he warns that “hundreds of millions of dollars going in to telling a story to the American people that 1% of the population is a threat… that does have an impact.” (74:31)
• Argues that bans on care “recommended by their doctors and consented to by their parents… prevent us from getting more scientific information about it. I think that violates the Constitution and I do think it's harmful.” (75:45)

10. Fundamental Philosophical Divide: What is Transgender Health?

• Douthat: Is being transgender a metaphysical, essential reality (“born in the wrong body”) or a psychological syndrome? This question underpins the disagreement over medical treatment. (78:05)
• Strangio: “For me, it feels… metaphysically, holistically, physiologically, biologically who I am, that I couldn't… there was no choice to be made… I can't always put it into words that are gonna make sense to another person.” (79:03)

Notable Quotes

• Strangio, on gender legal history:
  “We start to see this impulse to define sex for purposes of sorting and excluding trans people… as a legal category, with biological sex as a legal category, is a new phenomenon. It comes in 2016…” (28:40)

• Douthat, on backlash dynamic:
  “In part, it's rooted in a sense that your side is interested in compromise now, but just a few years ago was taking a much more maximalist position… If you overreach, then your protestations that you only want compromise might fall sometimes on deaf ears.” (67:49)

• Strangio, on the personal experience of transition:
  “It felt like coming home. It felt like resolving a longstanding period of homesickness and then finally getting into your own bed. And that enabled me to feel like there was a place for me in the world that I didn't feel before.” (39:30)

• Douthat, on the core question:
  “Is there a category, a real category, of people who are fundamentally born in the wrong body? ... if it is just a… psychological, sincere, profound sort of… condition that doesn't have this kind of almost metaphysical reality… you're telling teenagers to essentially sort of go to war with their own bodies.” (78:05)

• Strangio, on the need for dialogue:
  “I am very hesitant to announce things as transphobic without having an opportunity to try to have conversations. And that's where I am right now.” (55:45)

• On politics and harm:
  “The magnitude [of focus on our community] … is greatly disproportionate and very harmful. …I think a lot of us wish we could just be ignored.” (75:45)

Key Timestamps

• [03:21] – Bostock v. Clayton County legal argument
• [09:30] – Tennessee ban on youth gender-affirming care (Scarmetti)
• [20:28] – Strategic decisions and internal debate about Supreme Court litigation
• [23:47] – Definition of transgender, gender identity, and biological sex
• [27:35] – Whether legal prohibitions on sex discrimination include trans people
• [34:44] – Personal narrative: Strangio’s experience of transition
• [42:59] – Adult vs. youth transition, the shift in public debate
• [49:35] – Gatekeeping and actual numbers of minors accessing medical transition
• [52:53] – Discussion of regulatory models (e.g., West Virginia law)
• [61:32] – Sex-segregated sports and fairness
• [66:23] – Strangio’s proposed rule for trans participation in sports
• [74:17] – On coexistence and feeling “threatened” by policy critique
• [79:03] – The metaphysical experience of transgender identity

Tone & Style

The discussion is earnest, open, and sometimes personal. Douthat tries to draw sharp philosophical and political distinctions, while Strangio emphasizes nuance, procedural fairness, and the lived reality of being transgender. Both manage a tone of mutual respect alongside sometimes sharp disagreement.

Memorable Moments

• Strangio’s moving personal story of transition and its impact on his ability to function in the world (39:30).
• Candid acknowledgment of difficult and contentious movement choices, including willingness to address criticism and mistake (20:28).
• Constructive, clear effort by both host and guest to “land the plane” on practical compromise—particularly around sports, parental anxiety, and regulatory models versus categorical bans (61:32–67:49).
• Level-headed reflection on the political escalation, overreach, and the reality of backlash, rather than easy villainization.

Conclusion

The episode delivers a nuanced, comprehensive mapping of the current state of the transgender rights movement, its legal battlegrounds, the evolving political context, and the basic philosophical rift about the nature of trans identity and health. Through detailed back-and-forth and personal narrative, it manages to illuminate both the passionate convictions and genuine uncertainty that animate the American debate.

For more: Listen or subscribe to Interesting Times via NYT, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify.