410 Joe Rogan Experience Review of Dave Smith Et al.

Summary

Podcast Summary: Joe Rogan Experience Review Podcast - Episode 410: Review of Dave Smith Et al.

Release Date: November 13, 2024
Duration: Approximately 50 minutes of content
Hosts: Adam Thorne and Todd
Guest Analysis: Dave Smith and commentary on various political figures and media outlets

---

1. Introduction

Adam Thorne opens the episode by introducing the primary focus: a detailed analysis of an interview with Dave Smith, a political commentator, on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast. The discussion centers on the ideological shifts within the Democratic Party, the implications for upcoming elections, and the broader socio-political landscape in the United States.

---

2. Critique of Democratic Leadership Choices

Dave Smith initiates the conversation by critiquing former President Barack Obama and his selection of Vice Presidents:

• Obama's VP Choices:
  • Joe Biden: Described as "never particularly bright" and a choice to avoid someone who would overshadow Obama (00:55).
  • Kamala Harris: Similarly chosen to prevent overshadowing, aiming for diversity without strong policy backing (01:55).

Key Quotes:

• "Obama still was a bit of a narcissist and he wanted to pick Joe Biden as his VP. He didn't want someone who was gonna outshine him." (01:55)
• "Kamala Harris needs to pick someone who won't outshine her... it's like the idiocracy just spun out of control real quick." (02:50)

Analysis:

• The hosts agree that these VP selections have weakened the Democratic ticket, making it challenging to compete effectively against Republican candidates.
• Host 1 notes, “Dave Smith coming on strong... his critique about the ideological shift on the left” (02:58).

---

3. Democratic Party's Ideological Shift and Election Impact

Dave Smith argues that the Democratic Party has moved away from strong, policy-driven leadership to a focus on polarized social issues, resulting in a loss of voter trust and support.

Key Points:

• Polarization: Emphasis on social issues like transgender rights and immigration without substantive policy solutions (05:15).
• Echo Chamber Effect: Campaigns focus on positivity and echoing supporters' beliefs without addressing real issues (09:58).
• Media Influence: Declining trust in mainstream media like CNN and MSNBC, with audiences moving to platforms like X (formerly Twitter) for news (37:14).

Key Quotes:

• "They just assume that … they just stop listening to the competition to the other party." (14:02)
• "People are extremely sensitive, especially during election times, about social issues that are important to them." (18:01)

Analysis:

• The hosts discuss the Democratic Party's struggle to present a cohesive and effective platform, leading to voter disenchantment.
• Host 1 highlights the shift in media consumption, noting, “Elon's company is becoming very quickly like the most trusted news source” (37:14).

---

4. Potential Trump Administration Strategies and Challenges

The conversation transitions to the possible strategies if Donald Trump were to regain the presidency, focusing on immigration and pardons.

Key Points:

• Immigration Policies: Potential aggressive actions to reduce illegal immigration, affecting labor markets and the economy (26:34).
• Pardons: Discussion on notable pardons like Ross Ulbricht and Edward Snowden, arguing for their release based on perceived patriotism and exposing government overreach (21:21).
• Government Stability: Concerns about Trump's volatile nature and its impact on administration stability and key relationships, such as with Elon Musk (24:15).

Key Quotes:

• "Trump is in now, and one thing Dave was saying is, like, okay, how is he gonna move forward." (19:21)
• "It just seems like the gov't should have more regulation around it, like voting or your right to vote." (44:12)

Analysis:

• The hosts express hope that Trump would appoint competent individuals and implement effective immigration reforms without causing economic harm.
• Narrator 2 emphasizes the complexity of sudden immigration policy changes, stating, “These things can't happen overnight” (29:29).

---

5. Youth Health and Military Readiness

A significant portion of the discussion addresses alarming statistics about youth health and its impact on military service eligibility.

Key Points:

• Health Statistics: 77% of boys (high school to college age) are unfit for military service due to health issues like obesity, mental health, and substance abuse (32:07).
• Contributing Factors: Poor nutrition, lack of physical activity, and the detrimental effects of technology and social media on mental health (33:57).

Key Quotes:

• "77% have some combination of these things. So some of them have multiple, you know, sometimes it's, you know, like even if you have asthma or if you have like chronic fatigue stuff." (32:07)
• "Kids shouldn't be understanding nutrition worse than they did 20, 30 years ago." (34:30)

Analysis:

• The hosts discuss the need for systemic changes in nutrition education and mental health support to prepare youth for both military and civilian roles.
• Narrator 2 suggests, “We have to address it” (35:17).

---

6. Media Bias and Information Control

The episode delves into the influence of major tech companies, particularly Google, on the dissemination of political information and election-related content.

Key Points:

• Search Algorithm Bias: Instances where searches like "where can I vote for Trump" yield results favoring opponents, raising concerns about intentional bias (44:12).
• Alternative Platforms: Transition of trust from traditional media to platforms like X (Twitter), emphasizing open forums and community oversight (37:14).

Key Quotes:

• "The kind of bias in that we're seeing in these search algorithms is surely unsettling." (44:19)
• "Your family doesn't hate you, people still love you, even though they may vote differently than you." (18:01)

Analysis:

• The hosts express skepticism about the neutrality of search engines and advocate for awareness and alternative information sources.
• Host 1 encourages listeners to change their default search platforms to mitigate perceived biases (50:06).

---

7. RFK's Role and Health Policy Initiatives

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK) is discussed as a potential ally for Trump, focusing on health policies aimed at reducing obesity and chronic illnesses.

Key Points:

• Health Initiatives: Collaboration on policies that encourage healthier lifestyles and nutrition to improve overall public health (36:30).
• Political Alignment: RFK's alignment with Trump is seen as a strategic move to bolster health-centric policies within the administration (36:52).

Key Quotes:

• "Dave brings up kind of shocking stats... 77% of boys... are not fit for military service." (32:07)
• "They support what you went through." (51:34)

Analysis:

• The hosts highlight the importance of addressing public health to strengthen national security and workforce readiness.
• Host 1 expresses optimism about RFK's potential contributions, stating, “I really do respect his opinion on things” (40:34).

---

8. Policy vs. Candidate Voting

A recurring theme is the debate over voting based on individual policies rather than party affiliation or candidate popularity.

Key Points:

• Policy Focus: Advocating for a voting system centered on specific policies rather than charismatic or controversial candidates (54:19).
• Leadership Needs: Balancing policy-driven decisions with strong, effective leadership to navigate complex international and domestic issues (55:16).

Key Quotes:

• "We vote on the policy rather than the party." (54:19)
• "You could have a candidate that literally has every same value that you do based on this chart that you fill out." (55:16)

Analysis:

• The hosts discuss the feasibility and challenges of implementing a policy-focused voting system, emphasizing the necessity of competent leadership.
• Narrator 2 likens it to a "blind date," highlighting the unpredictability of such a system (54:21).

---

9. Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Adam Thorne and Todd wrap up the episode by reflecting on the insights gained from Dave Smith's analysis and the broader implications for future elections and political strategies.

Key Points:

• Media Evolution: The shift from traditional media to digital platforms like X changing how information is consumed and trusted (37:14).
• Future Elections: Anticipation of the next election cycle bringing new candidates and continuing the current socio-political dynamics (40:04).
• Appreciation for Commentators: Acknowledgment of Dave Smith and Tim Dillon for providing valuable perspectives and maintaining engagement (41:13).

Key Quotes:

• "This is why people like Dave Smith are so important because they help you get there." (40:34)
• "Tim's political commentary is a little lighter... but just as valuable." (55:16)

Analysis:

• The hosts emphasize the importance of informed commentary in navigating the complex political landscape.
• Narrator 2 concludes with a positive note, highlighting the refreshment brought by their discussions amid the election chaos (56:30).

---

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

• "Obama still was a bit of a narcissist and he wanted to pick Joe Biden as his VP. He didn't want someone who was gonna outshine him." — Commentator 1 (01:55)
• "77% have some combination of these things... now Elon's company is becoming very quickly like the most trusted news source." — Host 1 and Narrator 2 (32:07, 37:14)
• "They just assume that … they just stop listening to the competition to the other party." — Host 1 (14:02)
• "We vote on the policy rather than the party." — Host 1 (54:19)
• "This is why people like Dave Smith are so important because they help you get there." — Host 1 (40:34)

---

Conclusion

Episode 410 of the Joe Rogan Experience Review Podcast offers a comprehensive analysis of Dave Smith's perspectives on the Democratic Party's leadership choices, ideological shifts, media influence, and the potential impact of a Trump administration. Through an engaging dialogue, Adam Thorne and Todd dissect critical political issues, providing listeners with valuable insights into the current and future state of American politics. The episode underscores the necessity of informed commentary and policy-focused discourse in shaping a more cohesive and effective political landscape.

Transcript

[Advertiser 1]

Now AT T Mobile get four 5G phones on us and four lines for $25 a line per month when you switch with eligible trade ins all on America's largest 5G network.

[Advertiser 2]

Minimum of 4 lines for $25 per line per month with auto pay discount using debit or bank account, $5 more per line without autopay plus taxes and fees and $10 device connection charge phones via 24 monthly bill credits for well qualified customers. Contact us before canceling entire account to continue bill credits or credit stop and balance on a required finance agreement due bill credits end if you pay off devices early.

[Narrator 1]

Ctmobile.com in the dry states of the Southwest, there's a group that's been denied a basic human right in the Navajo Nation.

[Narrator 2]

Today, a third of our households don't.

[Narrator 1]

Have running water, but that's not something they chose for themselves. Can the Navajo people reclaim their right to water and contend with the government's legacy of control and neglect?

[Narrator 2]

Our water, Our future.

[Host 1]

Our water. Our future.

[Narrator 1]

That's in the next season of Reclaimed the Lifeblood of Navajo Nation. Listen now. Wherever you get your podcasts.

[Host 1]

JRE Review fans, head to the [e-mail] check out the new blog post, bios, etc. Also, we got Patreon over there, so get some exclusive content and we really appreciate your support. So go ahead, sign up for like as little as three bucks. We love that you are listening to.

[Host 2]

The Joe Rogan Experience Review Podcast. We find little nuggets, treasures, valuable pieces of gold in the Joe Rogan Experience Podcast and pass them on to you perhaps.

[Advertiser 2]

Excellent.

[Host 2]

Expand a little bit. We are not associated with Joe Rogan in any way. Think of us as the talking dead to Joe's walking Dead.

[Narrator 2]

You're listening to the Joe Rogan Experience Review.

[Host 1]

What a bizarre thing we've created now.

[Narrator 2]

With your host Adam Thorne.

[Narrator 1]

Might either be the worst podcast or the best one.

[Host 1]

One Go.

[Host 2]

Enjoy the show.

[Commentator 1]

So Obama, who was obviously a very, very smart guy and incredibly talented politician, at least while he was running for president, he was. I think he's lost a step. But so Obama still was a bit of a narcissist and he wanted to pick Joe Biden as his vp. He didn't want someone who was gonna outshine him. And so he picked Joe Biden, who, you know, if you were, even before he went senile, was never particularly bright. So he picked Joe Biden as his vp. And then Joe Biden, well, he wanted some diversity points and he also wanted someone to not outshine him because now he was becoming senile, and he was never that bright to begin with. So he picks Kamala Harris to be his vp, and then Kamala Harris needs to pick someone who won't outshine her. You know what I mean? So it's like the idiocracy just spun out of control real quick, where all of a sudden you get to the third VP in a row and you're like, yo, really? This is who you pick?

[Host 1]

He's a nut. Dave Smith coming on strong. Wow. Making some points about that Democratic downhill role. He kicked things off strong. Strong critique about the ideological shift on the left, let's say, especially how his stance, Their stance on, like, war and intervention has changed over the years. I mean, you know, if he's right about that kind of cascade of choices and it's, you know, somewhat. Seems logical, very quickly you get to a point where you don't have strong candidates, like, let's say that much. And that waltz guy was. I. I don't know if he really was on anybody's radar.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah. It was extremely underwhelming.

[Host 1]

Yeah.

[Narrator 2]

As a. As a candidate, maybe as a human. It's hard to say he would be.

[Host 1]

Underwhelming if that was my neighbor.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

I'm like, oh, that guy. He keeps asking me a lot of questions.

[Narrator 2]

That would be kind of.

[Host 1]

It's like the neighbor you don't really want to go outside for when you see him out there, because he's, like, gonna try and invite you over or something or want to hang out, and you're just like, I'm busy. I gotta. I'm just busy.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah. You. You wouldn't remember his name?

[Host 1]

No.

[Narrator 2]

I mean, you're no good with names to begin with.

[Host 1]

I'm surprised I did remember his name, even for this. It'll be gone soon. Yeah.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah. I think that the way that Dave was just framing this, it was like he's echoing what a lot of people are feeling in the country, which is this, like, feeling of that. Like they're in mourning over what the party used to be and, like, I think, hopeful that it can find its way back to representing what the Democratic people who've always voted democratically believe in and what they want, but that they're going to, like, take, you know, know, of some real issues. You know, the.

[Host 1]

They're going to have to.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

You know, but. But the parties do, you know, they. They come back around, they learn their lessons. They realize. I mean, it's. It's an interesting thing how these parties run often. You can see it kind of top down rather than bottom up, Meaning that it's the party that, like, is explaining to the people that believe in it. These are the morals and values and everything that we live by. And then the people cheer. Yeah, we like that. We follow you, we vote for you. But it's also the other way around. It's that they sit around waiting for the people that's going to vote for them to be like, all right, what are you into? What is this gay stuff? Okay. Gay marriage. Yep. And wait, wait, portion. Okay, we're on the. That. Check that box. Well, the other side's like gun, guns. You want, you want bazookas? We're into it. We give you bazookas, you know, so that, that everyone's kind of molding themselves all the time to, to be relevant and to exist. And what the Democrats found out is if they keep going down this path and prioritizing the things that they have been, they will eventually become too obscure to even, you know, hold competition against the other party. Yeah, so they, they will adjust, you know.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah, they're going to have to. I mean, I think when you look at the election results, it's quite shocking how red the image is.

[Host 1]

So red. It's just like a few cities are blue, which really is striking because, you know, when the number is like 63 million to 65 million in the voting, you're like, oh, that's 50, 50 spread out. Well, it technically is vote wise, but it's like, hold on a minute. Like, it just seems that we have two different types of people. And I'm not talking just ideal ideology and parties. It's like people that live in cities have a completely different requirement for what they need their government to be than people that live everywhere else. And there's more everywhere else. There's a lot more everywhere else than the cities. So in a way it should just be that the cities are just governed differently. It's always going to be an odd mix up. Otherwise you've got people in cities somehow telling the rest of the country how to live and all kind of vice versa.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah, yeah, I think there's something there. I think, I mean, I don't know.

[Host 1]

How you would do that.

[Narrator 2]

Right.

[Host 1]

Like, I'm just, I'm just throwing it out there. It's like there seems to be very distinct groups.

[Narrator 2]

Somebody smarter than us figure that out. But I think. Yeah, thanks. I think that the, you know, what I was getting at was that the left, basically, their issues were so polarized and so like, small. Like the social issues they were focused on in their campaign. One, they were kind of all over the place. Didn't really have any, like, good, strong policies on in the campaign. And then the ones that they were really, like, loud about, it was really.

[Host 1]

All their standard stuff. You know, it was like, we care for the minorities and we'll. You know, they kind of kept a little quiet on the transgender stuff because they knew that there, you know, that was kind of like losing some voting steam. You know, they. It was difficult for them to discuss the border because that had been a mess for four years, and she was kind of in charge of that. So there was a lot of skirting around that. And then it was just back to, we've just got to stay away from this fascism and this dictatorship. And we got to think about our. Our rights and keeping freedom. And it was just points that didn't really stand well. And she could never answer why she wasn't able to make anything really good happen over the last four years. And that's rough for her. I mean, she probably wouldn't have needed too many points of success to be able to kind of flip that switch. I think, you know, you got to have something to stand behind. It seemed like she had almost nothing.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah, she was a puppet. She was just kind of there. She was just.

[Host 1]

People. So many people online were describing this campaign as a perfect campaign. She ran the perfect campaign. And they're speaking like the shock is overwhelming them so much. And I almost feel like this is like when you watch those fake martial arts websites and like Instagrams where like the tai chi guy is like, oh, yeah, I'm gonna fight an MMA guy. And I've done Tai Chi for 40 years, so I'll just be at a, you know, Wing Chung him into the next universe. And the guy gets flatlined instantly and is still in shock and disbelief. Like, the delusion is high.

[Narrator 2]

So what do they define as a perfect campaign? How do they define a perfect campaign? Is it a campaign that loses? No, I think what happens.

[Host 1]

I think what they're saying is they're just listening to everything they like. This podcast is brought to you by DraftKings. Got an appetite for excitement? Fill up on Source Boss Barbecue, the newest exclusive slot game from DraftKings Casino. Play for mouth watering wins and check out one of a kind features like the collection multiplier and progress savings. New players play just five bucks to score 50 instantly in casino credits. Download the app and sign up with code Jrer. Then get a taste of Sauce Boss Barbecue. Exclusively on DraftKings. Casino. The Crown is yours. Gambling problem, call 1-800- GAMBLER in Connecticut. Helpers available for problem gambling, call 888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org Please play responsibly. 21/ physically present in Connecticut, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, West Virginia. Only void in Ontario eligibility restrictions apply. One offer per new casino customer. Casino credits are not withdrawable and expire in 168 hours. For additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see casino.draftkings.com Get50 ends November 24, 2024. Game availability varies by jurisdiction. They're like she said, everything that you would want to believe in. And I just, it was just a campaign of positivity. And, and everyone was happy and there was no hate. And we were all hopeful. It was like, just like this type of thing. And don't get me wrong, I love all that stuff, like hope and happiness and all of that is great, but there isn't really, like a substantive argument that I could decipher from it. It was just a lot of echo chamber stuff, hope. And ultimately, you know, people that were, you know, this is the problem with those echo chambers is they didn't realize what the kind of support that Trump was gaining, so they just assumed that, oh, well, Biden beat him in a landslide. So lots of people still hate Trump. So we just win again because we're the right side and we're the moral side. And when you stop listening to, you know, the competition to the other party and all the people that are going to vote for him, you don't even know not to say that this is your enemy and you got to know your enemy, but you got to know, you got to know the playing field. You've got to know how people are leaning. And I, and I, it just seemed like they lost track of that.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

You know, in a big way. The big thing that stood out for me is the amount of people that I know voted the other way and were always Democrats my whole life knowing them. And if you would ask me a year ago if these people would ever vote Republican, I would say, and especially for Trump, I would say no chance.

[Narrator 2]

Right.

[Host 1]

Like, not in a million years. Yet they did it.

[Narrator 2]

What do you think?

[Host 1]

There were multiples. They would just, they had no faith in Kamala figuring it out, and they were already tired of Biden. And it was a, it was a lot of what Dave was saying at the beginning. It's like Obama was a strong candidate. It's hard to argue against that. He was strong at what he did. He gained massive support. He got people behind him. He spoke in a way to everyone, was like, I mean, he crushed John McCain.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

I mean, it was. Just destroyed him.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

So then, if what Dave's saying is true, picked a slightly weaker vp, which, come on, we know Biden was. And then by the time he got into power, he was basically fried. I mean, he was barely working and went with a VP that was just to get some minority sympathy votes. Honestly, nobody liked her in the primaries.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

So then they're running her, and it really is just like the. I almost feel like. I hate to give this analogy, but it's like the third inbred cousin along the entire family tree. It's like, whoever you've got left to marry off to the next village.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

And you just like, oh, I guess we send Susie with a lazy eye over there.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah. You know, I think that another kind of thread throughout this whole election season was that I noticed was like, the level of sensitivity on the left. Like, there was almost no room to listen to real issues. Everything was like, you're attacking me and the people that I love because you're anti. Whatever. If you vote for Trump. You know, if you vote for Trump or if you don't vote for Kamala.

[Host 1]

What about the Tony Hinchcliffe joke? Yeah, you know, I mean, it's Tony Hinchcliffe from Kill Tony. I have met Tony. I have spoken to Tony multiple times at the Comedy Store. This dude, he is not a racist. The whole band that he has is black. I mean, I don't. I just don't see it. He's just not that type of guy. Now, does he say some up jokes? Of course, yeah. It's what he does. He does roasts, he does jokes. He thought that one would land. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't. Maybe he doesn't really give a shit. He just moved on. But the fact that the news, Obama, like, you name it, everyone discussed that joke as, like a way to kind of tie it to the Republicans and say, oh, this is who the Republicans are. They're people that would hate all minority groups and they're racist. And this is part of their fascism. People just aren't. They're not falling for it. I mean, it was Tony Hinchcliffe.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

That said this. He's not a fucking fascist. Right.

[Narrator 2]

I don't know. I feel like that might be like, one flaw in celebrities endorsing political candidates is, yes, they have sway. Yes, they have influence. But think about what's happening in, like, the world of Diddy. Like, I, you know, a lot of people that, you know, have associated themselves with P. Diddy in the past are endorsing the left, you know.

[Host 1]

Oh, yeah, JLo. JLo came out to have a good cry.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

And at the end of the day, if we are not following her judgment on all things, I don't know who we're following.

[Narrator 2]

But, yeah, when someone comes out and they endorse a candidate, but then something comes, you know, whatever, they do something that someone doesn't agree with, it's like, oh, the entire party. This represents the entire party. Which is absolutely not true. I think people are extremely sensitive, especially during election times, about social issues that are important to them. And I say get over it. You know, move on. Like, your family doesn't hate you, people still love you, even though they may vote differently than you. They probably just have a different priority list. You know, things are more. Some things are more important to them than others. And that doesn't make them a bad person, doesn't make them evil, doesn't make them a Nazi. It just makes them different. And I think we can all learn from each other to some extent. But also, let's just, like, put our. Put your guard down a little bit. You know, don't. Don't be so wound up.

[Host 1]

Yeah, they will be. People will be. They. This is tribal stuff and that. They're sold on it. It's almost like a religion with, you know, a lot of political people just. Yeah, it's like their. Their church, but every day.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

You know, but look, Trump is in now, and one thing Dave was saying is, like, okay, how is he gonna move forward, right? What are the things he's gonna do? Who's he gonna pick? I. I just saw a thing on Rubio. He. They just picked him and he made some, like, massive statements about wiping out Hamas and, like, he's not looking for a ceasefire energy. Dave doesn't like that. So it's going to be interesting to see who he surrounds himself with. Does his relationship with Elon stay strong? That seems like an important one. And Trump can be volatile. You know, when he gets upset, he's upset. He cuts people out. And it's like, is doing that to Elon worth it? On top of that, is there a great opportunity to pardon some people, too? I mean, Dave brought up the Ross Ulbrich case with Silk Road, the Silk Road founder. If you guys haven't seen the little movie on that, definitely check it out. It's wild and really fascinating. And, you know, also Edward Snowden, I think it would be incredible if Trump just went, we're pardoning Edward Snowden and he can come back to America. I mean, the guy is a patriot, even though he's labeled, you know, a terrorist, basically. Domestic terrorist, I guess. I mean, I think he's a patriot. He pointed out that the NSA was just spying on everybody and released that information and did it, you know, like, in a pretty ethical way. He went to the right news group that he trusted, he wanted it released carefully, and now he lives in Russia and he can't come back to America.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

And it's like, hey, people need to call out the government sometimes because they're up to some.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah, I think, you know, in the Ulbricht case, obviously, I'll have to watch that movie and learn a little bit more. But, you know, they talked a lot about people that they find, like, their intelligence as a threat, like, doing something like that. Creating this website isn't necessarily, like, against the law. Right. There's no law that says you can't create this website, create this platform for people to do something. But essentially, as it's happening, they're creating legislation around it and making it illegal. Like, that's different than just, like, catching a criminal. You're, like, creating a reason. Same thing with poor little Peanut. You know, it's like, Peanut was not a criminal. Neither was his owner necessary.

[Host 1]

I mean, don't get me wrong, there eventually was some pretty sketchy shit happening on Silk Road, and it was. It was kind of set up in a way to be at a skirt. You know, taxes, regulations, you name it. I mean, it needed some oversight, for sure. But I also get what you mean. It's like he shouldn't be in jail forever with no chance of parole for making a website.

[Narrator 2]

Right.

[Host 1]

That, you know, really wasn't intended to harm anybody.

[Narrator 2]

Well, yeah, I mean, and I'm curious how many, like, other similar cases, people just were fined.

[Host 1]

People get arrested all the time for making child pornography websites and they don't go to jail forever. Yeah, And I would way rather they did, honestly. Yeah, yeah, of course. And I think a lot of people would say, oh, yeah, of course. Good people, forgiving people, empathetic people would say that. And still, for some reason, our justice system is like, oh, yeah, his two years and you're on a list.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah. Well, I think something to note is, you know, Trump has nothing to lose this term. You know, he doesn't have to worry about reelection. Maybe J.D. vance does. Maybe he tries to keep him in line a little Bit. But he has nothing to lose. He can come in, he can just, you know, plow right through and really do anything that he wants. And I would say in his mind, he probably feels this way because there's.

[Host 1]

He'S gonna golf a lot. It's gonna do a lot of golf.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah. I mean, you know, there, there's a lot of talk about, in his first, during the, you know, the first Trump administration, what, how many people he fired, how many people were in and out of his, you know, cabinet and everything. I think it's probably going to be similar. Hopefully some of the important people like we've talked about, you know, RFK and elon, those people stick around and those relationships hold. But I don't think Trump cares that much. I mean, ideally they will be.

[Host 1]

I've got a feeling he has more experience now though, so. So hopefully he puts people that he works better with in place early on. And they're also appointing people that are good teams. I mean, if you think about it, you don't need to make many high level appointees that are bad before you are really causing a problem for yourself.

[Narrator 2]

Right.

[Host 1]

Because they are all gonna hire people that are bad. You know, and then it's, it just kind of systematically falls apart. So I'm really hoping that is a part of his strategy that he's learned from, that he knows, you know, how to do better.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah. But I guess if you were to go back and say like, did he. Because you know, there's the whole drain, the swamp, like ski, not scheme but like thing in his first campaign, like, did he do that? What do people think that maybe he, like that he accomplished draining the swamp or is now the time where he's going to really do it, make some really bold moves and actually feel like he did what hit on his agenda.

[Host 1]

Yeah.

[Narrator 2]

In the White House. And I don't, I think he's coming.

[Host 1]

In with the same energy, the same wants.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

He couldn't get like there were a lot of safeguards in place to kind of stop and hinder anything that he was trying to do the first time he was in. I mean, they were basically impeaching him from the second he got in there.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

Now it's going to be so much harder. Look you, I mean, they tried to cancel Donald Trump and when I say they, it's like the government that was in, you know, arrested, basically put him in jail. That was their plan. Now he's the President, so felonies and charges and anything, just goodbye. And now he's in Charge again for four years. And he's not running. I mean, holy shit. Imagine that. And now he's going to go, yeah, we're going to clean out. I mean, he brought in that border guy, the guy that's going to run the border down there. Forget his name. But he is a serious dude.

[Narrator 2]

I mean, I didn't catch that.

[Host 1]

He's 100% like, yeah, we're kicking them out. They're all gone, day one.

[Narrator 2]

I mean, okay, so what's your opinion? Do you think that that's going to affect the cost of labor in our country? Do you think that that's going to have a negative effect to, like, you know, take away a lot of the immigrants who do perform laborious jobs? Like, is that going to affect us to do it all overnight? Like, they're hoping.

[Host 1]

I mean, it's. It would have to. Right. Which does beg a bit of the question, like, ultimately, is that good or bad for the economy? I mean, there's, there's. Look, there's good and bad on every side of any argument. It's like, if it's potentially kicking, you know, elite, like terrorists and criminals out of this country, that's probably a good move. That's pretty good. Well, yeah, but if it's also just tearing a lot of people out, that would be working hard and working a lot in this country. You know, that's. That's kind of a difficult one. I mean, I have friends that own construction companies, and they have a lot of illegal Hispanic people that work for them and people from South America that work really hard, do a great job, always show up to work, always do what they're going to say.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

That they're going to do. And then. And, you know, this is how these people run their business. And, you know, those employees get to take a chunk of that money back home with them and really help out. It's like kind of just an unwritten rule is like, that's the American way.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah, well. And, yeah, I mean, I. The American dream, you know, I mean, they said you're an immigrant and you've. You've immigrated to this country, you know, and you. You've been to that process. It's not an easy process. And the idea of the American dream is like, almost like it almost doesn't exist anymore because things cost so much and because now we have this, like, sort of attack on immigration where the real problem is not immigrants, it's criminals that are immigrating. Right. It's people that are fleeing their country because they're being either persecuted or because they're breaking laws or just because they're running or for whatever reason, they think they can have a more successful crime life here in America. Then like, you know, that's, that's the issue that we're facing. But between the potential tariffs, increasing the cost of goods and the potential cost of cost increases of labor, I mean, there's going to be plenty of industries that completely crash if something else isn't, like, fixed within it. Right. So, like, these things can't happen overnight. And I feel like a lot of Trump's like, promises are immediately, I'm gonna make this happen. And people are really expecting that.

[Host 1]

But also maybe that does work. Maybe there's some plan that we don't know. Right. This is a big part of it. It's like you can speculate all you want, we also can't stop them. So let's just watch what happens and adjust accordingly. Right. I don't really know, though, how you turn around this, like mass illegal immigration that we just had. You probably do have to be pretty strict about it. And if it's as big as they say it, we're not going to be able to kick them all out overnight regardless.

[Narrator 2]

Right? Yeah.

[Host 1]

So there still will be plenty of people to work and, you know, have that kind of cheaper labor, I would imagine. You know, it's like set the rules in motion day one. But everyone knows when it comes to government, it takes, it takes time.

[Narrator 2]

Right?

[Host 1]

You know, it just really does take time. One thing I wanted to get to is the RFK stuff. So many mixed feelings on this. You know, it seems like many on the left that were always RFK guys, or a big chunk of them have just completely lost it with him because, you know, he went with Trump and you know, they all lean on his anti vaccine type energy. Right. Which is really just questioning forced and mandated medications into children and others. But, you know, he's gonna step up hopefully and start to work with Trump and other people in the administration for health factors and really ones that minimize obesity. Because if you can minimize that metric, you know, above all others, you're reducing disease and, and chronic illness across the board. Yeah, right. For their whole life. And that's a fantastic thing to do. And, and then Dave brings up kind of shocking stats. 77% of boys, which is what, like high school age, high school, college, are not fit for military service. Do the issues like poor health, mental health, substance abuse, you know, obesity is a big part of the poor health. That's crazy. 77%. What does that mean? 77% of these boys can't do like regular fitness stuff like go for a jog and do push ups.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah, the way that they put it was 77% have some combination of these things. So some of them have multiple, you know, sometimes it's, you know, like even if you have asthma or if you have like, I don't know, like there's like chronic fatigue stuff. Now there's like all these crazy things that like people kind of, or like maybe even ADHD could be one of these that technically is like a diagnosis, a mental health diagnosis that doesn't make you fit for like all military service. And because we're not in a draft or whatever, they're not taking anyone. That's not like peak performance level, like they don't need that many people. But it's, it's such a sign of what's happening in the times, right? Like the lack of regulations we have on food, the lack of support we have for mental health, this younger generation, this Gen Z, this, you know, even the gosh, whatever the next one is that's coming up, like we're going to continue to see these trends until something drastic happens. You know, in addition to that, we know the toll that technology and social media takes on mental health and the spread of information and the you know, like kind of glamorization of being ill or of having problems. You know, like promoting being like vulnerable and all of these things, if that makes sense. So people sort of like lean into like oh, I'm depressed or oh, I have anxiety or I have this and I self medicate and I have all these things or I self diagnose and you go to sign up for the military and you fill out a form and you're like, yeah, I have this, I have this. And they're like, you don't qualify. So I think that the statistic is a little bit more drastic than probably the reality of it. But that being said, like it is really odd and important that we turn this around and that we address it.

[Host 1]

Yeah, I mean when I was in high school in the 90s, they were like taking a lot of people into the military. It was like a lot of people from my high school that probably weren't going to get jobs right. In many other places or were joining the military. Yeah, and that's not a knock on the military at all. These people actually, you know, in a lot of ways turned out great because they got great skills from that experience that they wouldn't have got. You Know, working more menial jobs around the city that I went to high school in, so. But still, you know, not pretty. And we got to get these younger kids healthy again. We got to get them out playing and, and understanding nutrition. And this shouldn't be getting worse. You should, kids shouldn't be understanding nutrition worse than they did 20, 30 years ago. It's like, that seems like an awful trick.

[Narrator 2]

Well, not with the amount, like I said, the amount of information that they have access to. It's not like they have to walk to the library and get a book and like read about how to have a healthy diets. Like they just, it's like, can just be part of their algorithm.

[Host 1]

There should be an app on your phone and you scan like a crumble cookie and it says you will be obese if you eat this and you'll die.

[Narrator 2]

Those things do exist. I mean there are apps, but most of them are not funded by the government and they are all done privately. So it's like you can just sort of pick someone. You're like, I align with Bobby, whatever his name is, or he has an app, Bobby says, and you know, so you pick these people and you sort of say, this is the type of health I align with. And I'm going to like filter my food and my choices based on this. And it's all across the board. You know, there's the, there's all the way from being a vegan plant based, you know, all of that all the way to like keto and like, you know, supplements and whatever. So there's no one government regulated platform that says like this is what we endorse, this is how, and here's what we subsidized to make it happen. Right? Like we've talked about that before, the subsidization of the products that are on food stamps basically for a huge portion of our country, especially the low income individuals in our country. Soda, number one, purchase juices, juices, soda, processed cereals, you know, literally no protein available. When you on some of these programs.

[Host 1]

You live on carbs.

[Narrator 2]

You literally live on figure it out. Sugar, some canned things like beans, you.

[Host 1]

Don'T need muscles, just keep moving with your limited muscles.

[Narrator 2]

And it's like, why are we not like, why is there not like a protein pat shake for people that are busy and you know, don't know how to cook? It's like that's the easiest way to get, you know, a really important, you know, regardless, like those things are need to be overhauled. And that's something I'm very excited about and hopeful for having Trump having won an rfk, aligning with him.

[Host 1]

Yeah, I think he, I think they're going to do it. You know, and here's a big thing for like mainstream media. Right. It's. And Dave was saying this. I mean, he had some strong words for CNN and msnbc, but what they're not going to get this time around that they got in spades when Trump was first in is huge ratings.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

I mean, CNN's ratings dropped so massively after Trump lost that last election. And, you know, the CNN people love that in the sense of like, they wanted him to lose. They didn't want to lose all their ratings, but people stopped paying attention to them. And after the Russian gate and a lot of their kind of COVID news, they've lost so much confidence with people that they're not going to be tuning into CNN to get all the new goss on Trump.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

There's other outlets now. People will be going to X, which, by the way, Twitter X. You know, Elon's company is becoming very quickly like the most trusted news source. I mean, it just happened. I think today there was a article I read that like Italy's number one news source, trusted news source. Right now as X, multiple countries are doing this and it's happening in the US as well.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

Which I think is wild. But it's, it's just because it's that open forum, they have community notes. You know, there's like an oversight that's from everybody. What better way to get it than these random memes that like, pop up on Instagram and say, this guy said this and he sucks. And then something, something about diddy parties. And you're like, I can't, I can't verify any of this.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah. I. Joe, like, was like, elon needs to buy CN it. And they're like, why would he. Well, because we need them. We need him to do it. We need him to fix it. He's the only one that can do it.

[Host 1]

Don't buy that piece of. Just make your own news source. Yeah.

[Narrator 2]

Which. But garbage, you know, broadcast television, there's still an audience for it, an older audience. I think that's, that's also been an issue with like, you know, the boomer generation or the generation. So the gen Y, you know, they, they trust like those television sources. Like, they find one that they watch and they're like, this is the truth and there's no other potential truth out there. And that's something that, you know, when he said that. I'm like, oh my gosh. No, that does make sense. Maybe if Elon did buy it and was like, this is a completely non biased, like unfiltered TV source, some of these people who maybe aren't getting their information from social media might start to, and start to see that like things really have shifted within the parties, within the nation, within like the beliefs of the people and they won't feel so like polarized and attacked through these, this the next election cycle.

[Host 1]

Right.

[Narrator 2]

Like we're through it. We can all take take a deep breath and kind of have some relief for a little bit. But we'll get back to it. In two years, the talk will start again and it'll be a whole new pool of candidates. And it'd be really nice to see like a better way to access information about the party, about the policies, about, you know, what's happening in the world for sure.

[Host 1]

With less mess and bullshit. And I mean, you know, and this is why people like Dave Smith are so important, because they help you get there.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

You know, when we're in the loss of social media, he is somebody that steps up and, and really articulately analyzes and explains topics that are being so misconstrued by these different sides. And I really do respect his opinion on things. I'm so glad he gets to be on Rogan so often. And yeah, I'm not surprised that in the middle of the night, on election night, you know, I think two, three in the morning, it was Dave who Rogan spoke to. Like he's just that trusted.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

When it comes to this type of information and even his breakdown of what happened to the left and why they've lost people's trust and why they probably lost this election, I think it was, it was valuable. You know, it's like people on the left could hear it and think that's just a criticism and ignore it and it's bullshit. But actually that's the sort of feedback you would want from a coach, a business coach that was helping you with your llc. If you sit there and listen, it's like, well put together. He's not just trying to say things to make you sad.

[Narrator 2]

Right.

[Host 1]

It's a good breakdown of like these things went wrong and if you address them, you know, you wouldn't have done that bad anyway. Check, check out that conversation. I really liked it. It came at a great time right after the election, right after Joe talking to Trump and also talking with Elon. Really, really good. We're going to finish up Here with Tim Dillon. You know, Tim's political commentary is a little lighter, I would say, than Dave's, but just as valuable. I mean, he's a national treasure after all. You know, they get into it. I mean, obviously Tim's being pretty silly about a lot of it, but it has great points throughout. I mean, they discuss Elon Musk's contracts and potentially taking those away. Government contracts, putting more restrictions on Twitter. All these things happening, just like Elon was saying, you know, and really putting a lot of weight on this election. And, you know, here's the thing, you could say, oh, it's just a lot of weight for Elon. Well, yeah, kind of true, but also like slowing down us getting to Mars, which kind of is like symbolic of the human species progressively achieving. Right. It's like there's something beautiful about like landing on the moon. It's a big, big thing. And then any sort of closure of Twitter is the type of censorship that America just doesn't stand for. It's just not what America is. I don't think, you know, you can make all the excuses you want. Oh, it has hate, it has this, it has that. It's kind of the news for the world. I don't think that's a place that government should be restricting. It just seems like a slippery slope.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah, yeah, absolutely. You said it all. I mean, I think you start censoring one place and it makes it appropriate to do so in another. And I think we can kind of work it the other way. Like we were just talking about, you know, if more and more sort of open, you know, non censored platforms become available, then I think they'll continue to come.

[Host 1]

What do you think about when they were searching a Google for where can I vote for Trump? And the top results were where can I vote for Harris? And other articles criticizing Trump. Now I get that Google is its own company and it can display information however it wants to. And if it has its own bias about what it likes and doesn't like, it can say, I mean, it's. Google's gonna be more pro America than pro Russia.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

Does that mean that the people in Russia trying to use Google are gonna be pissed off with the results? Yeah, of course. However, since it is such a used tool for most people and like, when someone is trying to find some information, you know, and they say are Republicans. Like, hey, where can I vote? That one is like, yeah, it just. It seems ugly.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah, it feels, feels invasive. It seems ugly. The kind of bias in that we're Seeing in these search algorithms is surely unsettling. Like, it makes you wonder how much influence these tech giants like Google have on, like, a general public opinion and the types of things that they're. When they're searching, the kind of information they're receiving. What I know about Google Search, Google Ads, Google SEO, all of that. And just from my education of that topic and that platform, with the right amount of money and the right technical, like, backing within your webpage or your search or your information that's online, you can redirect almost anyone who's trying to search something. If you can predict what someone's going to search, you can redirect them to your site. So I don't see this as like a huge conspiracy. I see it as they put a lot of money into redirecting people. So, for example, there was a time where we were trying to go to Home Depot and we searched Home Depot. We, we put it into Google Maps and it literally drove us, we selected it and it literally drove us to Harbor Freight. And it's like that was paid Google Ads power. That was the power of Google Ads, basically.

[Host 1]

Right.

[Narrator 2]

So I don't see this as like this major conspiracy. It's obviously unsettling. I wish that it wasn't allowed. I think there should be some regulation around it, like, especially when it comes to something as sensitive as an election or voting or your right to vote, your right to information about, you know, something like this, like voting for the person who's going to run your country. Like, you know, when it comes to.

[Host 1]

Like, oh, so you're saying it's like possibly more of an accident just based.

[Narrator 2]

On, I mean, it was very intentional from the Harris campaign. If that, if this, if what's happened. What happened. What I'm saying I think happened happened was extremely intentional and they put a lot of money behind it. The Trump campaign could have done the exact opposite. They could have said or the exact same thing, but flipped it. They could have said, if someone typed in, where do I vote for Kamala Harris? If they had put that into their keywords and then redirected to their site, the Google search and paid enough money and put an ad in and paid more than Kamala Harris's campaign did, it would have come up. Here's where you vote for Donald Trump.

[Host 1]

Oh, I guess, I guess the issue is like, it's known that Google was a big contributor to the Harris campaign.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah. And there is, there's absolute potential.

[Host 1]

So there's like some issue there.

[Narrator 2]

There's absolutely potential.

[Host 1]

I mean, listen, ChatGPT just came out with a different type of search function. It's starting to work a lot more like Google. I don't know, I can't speak for anybody else out there, but I've been using chat a lot over the last year, year and a half. I've liked it, I love playing with it. Now that it has that feature on there, I almost don't use Google at all. And I don't know how long it's going to take for chat or other search AIs to basically replace what Google is. I mean, Google was the only game in town for a while. And once these stories start coming out about how they give you information around your election, people aren't going to need that much more of a nudge. I mean, if you're annoyed with a company, you will take a slightly shittier service for a while just out of frustration and that lowers the bar for the competition for sure. And I really do feel like that's going to happen.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah, I think with Google's place in the tech world and it basically, the term Google, it is synonymous with look it up on the Internet. I don't know that we can reverse that. That's like telling someone, stop calling the thing you wipe your nose with a Kleenex. Like every brand in the world makes their own line of Kleenexes. But you can't just like stop telling people to say Kleenex. Right? Like it's, I'm forgetting the technical term for it. But like Google, it's always going to be the go to. It's always going to be the default for people even in their minds, right? So, you know, for instance, on, on iPhones, I open Safari. And so I actually get like, I think it's a. But you can choose your search platform. Like you can just choose your homepage. Like I have mine set to Google because all my accounts are set hooked up to Google. But like you can change it. And so if that's something that bothers you, I would just say start there. Like, don't. Like, you can set your default browser to something besides Google and start there and see if you start to get different results or literally go side by side and search it and see what actually is different for just like anything random that is important to you or not important to you, but irrelevant.

[Host 1]

Right?

[Narrator 2]

And start there. And I mean obviously awareness and is power and knowledge is power. So telling people, you know, try this or you know, encouraging your family members if you feel like Google is being really biased or Is like not doing right by you and what you're trying to achieve. You can encourage them or help them to like change their search, their, you know.

[Host 1]

Yeah, knock it off, Google. I don't know how you're doing it. Just knock it off.

[Narrator 2]

But we're never gonna like tell Google how to run Google until.

[Host 1]

I thought I just did. Okay, you wait till Google listens to this podcast.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah.

[Host 1]

And they'll be like, hey, that guy that reviews the Joe Rogan experience, you.

[Narrator 2]

Know what you should do?

[Host 1]

We're going to change, we're going to change it.

[Narrator 2]

We're going to put this on a disc and we're going to mail it to them. A floppy and listen to this. Google. Fuck you, Google.

[Host 1]

And they'd be like, we can't, we can't play this. Can't use what? We need an Amish computer. What is this?

[Narrator 2]

None of our computers even have a CD player anymore.

[Host 1]

What about when Tim pointed out that the Harris campaign was running opposing messages on Palestine and Israel? Right. And so like basically she was having some pro Palestine ads running and then in other areas, probably to Jewish people, like, pro Israel. Like, we support you. We support what you went through. Like that kind of is wild.

[Narrator 2]

It's, it's peculiar. I mean I've never.

[Host 1]

And listen, listen. You can sit there, be listening to this conversation and be like, oh, I'm sure Trump did similar things in similar area. And I'm like, okay, fine, look. Yeah, possibly also we're only talking about this. That got caught by cnn. CNN caught this and caught her out on it. I mean, how bad do you have to be in your own left wing party when left wing CNN calls you out on it? Because that's the problem. The Israeli Palestinian thing kind of divides the left in a way. They don't even know how to handle it.

[Narrator 2]

Right.

[Host 1]

It's not like they can just be like blaming one side on Republicans.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah. I would say this is one of those topics where just like with the, you know, with the immigration, the mass amounts of immigration into swing states, like I want a rebuttal from her or from them. I want them to say this is what happened or this is where the miscommunication is. I want some kind of explanation. I don't doubt that there is one. I don't doubt that there. Will someone put this out or we used AI to put together our fucking campaign and it got confused, you know, as it does. I don't, and I don't know. Or there's just too many people involved and the Message got mistaken. I don't know. But like, someone needs to own up to it. Someone needs to clarify. Someone needs to come out and say, no, this is what we actually stand for, and denounce one of those topics. I mean, those, you know, preferences. Because they're different. They're very, very, very different. You know, that's just like saying, you know, I support, you know, abortion, but I'm also, you know, pro life. Like, you can't be both, unfortunately, in terms of, like, voting, right? You either vote for it or you don't. And this was sort of one of those things where we don't. We reminded me of a discussion we had prior about voting based on topic and policy rather than candidate. Right. The candidates are upon. The candidates are a face. They're, they're there to put on the show. Essentially there has to be someone in office. But, like, I truly feel like they should be an anonymous person. And whoever they just say this is the, like, find two people that have, or a group of people that have a number of, you know, varying levels of support for different policies, you know, combinations of support. And whoever we vote on as a country, that whoever represents us, like, represents what we vote for in terms of the policy. Right? So we vote on the policy rather than the party.

[Host 1]

And you need a leader, though, you.

[Narrator 2]

Need a face, because it gets people riled up. But this is part of what I see is the problem is people get behind an individual or they dislike an individual. For example, Trump for things that his mannerisms, the way that he talks, his sort of like, you know, like sometimes, like, I even have a hard time listening to him.

[Host 1]

The amount of pussies that he potentially grabs.

[Narrator 2]

Yes, all of the things, I mean.

[Host 1]

That'S going to rile people up.

[Narrator 2]

But if they fully are committed as the politician or as the person to, like, uphold the policies that they stand for, that they say they're going to, and they, and we vote them in based on these are the policies that we want enacted. Then, like, what are we going to do? I mean, it's like a blind date, basically. Or like, you know, those dating shows where you talk to people for you and then they move the wall and you're like, oh, okay, this is who I got. I'm going to go with it. Right? Or you, or you don't. But like, I don't know that. That's just. It kind of keeps coming back to that.

[Host 1]

There's something to it, you know, potentially. I mean, it definitely does remove some of the emotion from it. And you know, but at the end of the day, it wouldn't matter. You could have a candidate that literally has every same value that you do based on this chart that you fill out. And then they're an absolute dope and you put them up against Putin or the Middle east and it's a total disaster. Like you gotta, you gotta have like real leadership out there too. And then, and you know, that's, that's where it gets tricky. But look, Tim's conversation is always good. He's. He's like the most comical version of real talking points in the news as you can get. This is why he's so important. He's ridiculous. His say outrageous shit. He gets away with it, which he always should. And he also is like really well informed about what is going on, how wacky things are. And he just puts an incredible spin on it. I love it. I love the guy. He's so funny. And yeah, good week of, good week of pods for Rogan. Good couple of weeks. I mean he's, he's on fire right now.

[Narrator 2]

Yeah, I'll say. The Tim Dillon, you know, final notes is that this was like the most refreshing during this whole time of the election. Leading up to the election, this has been the most refreshing podcast to listen to, the easiest to get through and I think we can all breathe a sigh of relief, I would say.

[Host 1]

All right, thanks guys, as always and gals, we will speak to you next week.

[Narrator 2]

Cheers y'all.

[Advertiser 1]

Now AT T Mobile get four 5G phones on us and four lines for $25 a line per month when you switch with eligible trade ins. All on America's largest 5G network.

[Advertiser 2]

Minimum of 4 lines for $25 per line per month with auto pay discount using debit or bank account. $5 more per line without auto pay plus taxes and fees and $10 device connection charge phones via 24 monthly bill credits for well qualified customers. Contact us before canceling entire account to continue bill credits or credit stop and balance on a required finance agreement too. Bill credits end if you pay off devices early. CT mobile.com how do you feel when.

[Host 2]

You switch to GEICO and save on your car insurance? It's like going to work on one Thursday morning and thinking to yourself, just one more day until Friday. But then somebody in the elevator says happy Friday. Then you check your phone quickly and discover today is actually Friday. So yes, Happy Friday. Random stranger in the elevator. Happy Fri. Yay. Indeed. Yep, switching and saving with GEICO feels just like that. Get more with geico.

[Chris Gethard]

Hi, I'm Chris Gethard, and I'm very excited to tell you about Beautiful Anonymous, a podcast where I talk to random people on the phone. I tweet out a phone number. Thousands of people try to call. You talk to one of them. They stay anonymous. I can't hang up. That's all the rules. I never know what's going to happen. We get serious ones. I've talked with meth dealers on their way to prison. I've talked to people who survived mass shootings. Crazy, funny ones. I talked to a guy with a goose laugh, somebody who dresses up as a pirate on the weekends. I never know what's going to happen. It's a great show. Subscribe today. Beautiful Anonymous.