Podcast
Judging Judy | #1 comedy podcast
Hosted by Judging Judy · EN
Experience America’s favorite least favorite TV judge with the Judging Judy comedy podcast, the only show that turns the tables to decide if Judy Shendlin is innocent — or guilty. Each week, we take a fun look back at an episode from the extensive, 25+ year archives of Judge Judy telecasts. You’ll get a refresher for what was going on in the world when the episode originally aired plus a one-of-a-kind play-by-play of the cases that came before Judy that day in court.
More importantly, and more hilariously, you’ll get a critique of Judy herself: her antics, her decisions, her mood and much, much more.
For fans of podcasts like Doughboys, Comedy Bang Bang, Cinephobe and All Fantasy Everything, Judging Judy is the nostalgic, pop-culture podcast that takes seriously its duty to judge Judy.
Comments, questions or complaints? judgingjudypod@gmail.com
More importantly, and more hilariously, you’ll get a critique of Judy herself: her antics, her decisions, her mood and much, much more.
For fans of podcasts like Doughboys, Comedy Bang Bang, Cinephobe and All Fantasy Everything, Judging Judy is the nostalgic, pop-culture podcast that takes seriously its duty to judge Judy.
Comments, questions or complaints? judgingjudypod@gmail.com
10episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
Judging Judy 38 - Homeward Hound?
May 2500:31:39Tap to summarizeShe was looking for a new house in Vegas, so she left her dog with her neighbor. Now, that neighbor says the dog is her’s to keep! Will Judy side with the lady who lost her dog or the neighbor who cared for it free? And will we find Judy innocent or guilty? Because, of course, this is the Judging Judy podcast, the only podcast that turns the tables on America’s favorite, least favorite Judge.Enjoying the pod? Consider supporting us by sending a dollar or two our way at tiptopjar.com/judgingjudy. Or don’t. Whatever. I’m not your boss.This week’s episode comes to us from 2008, when the times were real bad. You remember 2008, right? Or has the therapy worked and you’ve completely blanked it out. Either way, this case is about a lady who needed a few months to find a house. She claims her neighbor agreed to watch her dog and her jewelry, but that when she came back, the neighbor claimed it all as her own. Now she wants her money, and her dog, back. Judy’s going to if she gets it and we’re going to have to decide if Judy did her job or not. Did she really, truly deliver justice? Not just to the plaintiff and to the defendant, but to all of us! Judging Judy is in the spirit of other popular comedy podcasts like the Doughboys and All Fantasy Everything, but it offers a perspective all its own by examining the world through the lens of Judy Shendlin, a cultural icon for over three decades. She’s had the opportunity to judge us, and in the process, she’s made an enormous impact on our society. But we’ve never had the opportunity to judge her in turn — until now.
Transcribe →Judging Judy 37 - Toe Be or Not Toe Be
May 1800:29:22Tap to summarizeThis week, we’ve got two cases: one over an engagement ring after a failed engagement and one about a dog with one missing toe. Judy’s going to have to decide whether the defendant was right to sell the ring in the first case. Then, she’ll have to decide whether the dog owner should get a discount. And, more importantly, we’ll have to decide if Judy is innocent, because this is Judging Judy, the comedy podcast that finally, after all these years, turns the tables on America’s favorite, least favorite Judge. Enjoying the pod? Consider supporting us by sending a dollar or two our way at tiptopjar.com/judgingjudy. Or don’t. Whatever. I’m not your boss. Our first case has a couple whose engagement lasted than six months. When things were over, she gave him a check that covered some of the cost of the ring, but not the ring itself. She says she deserved some of the money herself both because she worked hard to find the ring and she owed her boss a kickback for helping her get it. The plaintiff says that since he can’t get the ring back, he wants to be paid in full. Meanwhile, our second case has an elderly woman complaining the dog that she bought to breed didn’t come as promised because it’s missing a toe. Her claim is that now she won’t able to get more puppies out of it. The breeder says he’s more than happy to pay her back; but only if he gets the dog back. Judy’s going to have to decide who gets paid and who doesn’t. We’re going to have to decide whether Judy delivered justice. If so, she’s innocent. But if not, she’s guilty. Judging Judy is an ideal podcast for fans of Stephen Colbert, the Doughboys, All Fantasy Everything, and Cinephobe. Equal parts witty commentary and biting parody, Judging Judy examines America through the lens of Judy Shendlin, long-time cultural icon. For decades, she’s judged us. Now it’s our turn to judge her. ˜
Transcribe →Judging Judy 36- So You Think You'd Wear Pants
May 1100:30:51Tap to summarizeWelcome back to 2008, and welcome to Judging Judy! This case comes to us from May 1st, and features cases about stolen phones and wrecked cars. We’ve got a divorced couple fighting it out and two former friends doing battle. We’ve got lots of yelling, care of Judy, too! But, will we have justice?! That’s for us to decide, because this is the comedy podcast that finally turns the tables on America’s favorite, least favorite TV judge. This, of course, is Judging Judy. Enjoying the pod? Consider supporting us by sending a dollar or two our way at tiptopjar.com/judgingjudy. Or don’t. Whatever. I’m not your boss. In our first case, the plaintiff says her ex-husband stole her son’s phone and ran up a big bill. She also says he didn’t pick up their kids from day care, resulting in her getting fined. What does he say? Not much of anything — and it seems to be paying off for him, too! Which side of this broken home will Judy side with? Our second case has a plaintiff who says her car got wrecked by a jealous girlfriend. The defendant says that it wasn’t her fault and that the plaintiff parked there at her own risk. There’s also the matter of the defendant’s boyfriend cheating on her and not wearing pants in the courtroom, but we’ll let Judy sort out that mess! All of this, of course, leads up to the most important part of the show: when we get to Judge Judy. Because Judy shouldn’t be the only one making a ruling! For over 25 years, Judy has cast judgement on us without nary an opportunity for us to do the same. Well, that’s over! Each week, we look at Judy’s words, her actions, her behavior, her rulings and her attitude to decide if she truly delivered justice. If so, she’s innocent. But if not, she’s guilty! A refreshing, unique comedy podcast that re-examines culture and society through the lens of daytime TV, fans of the Doughboys, Comedy Bang Bang, Stephen Colbert, Kazuo Ishiguro and Hot Pockets will fall in love with Judging Judy. Equal parts pop culture commentary and witty take-down, Judging Judy is for fans of the original show and folks who’ve never heard of Judge Judy alike.
Transcribe →Judging Judy 35- for Truck's Sake
May 400:30:37Tap to summarizeRomance gone wrong! A friendship that leads to fisticuffs! It’s back to 1998 this week on Judging Judy, and we’ve got juicy cases. First, we’ve got a plaintiff who needed money to rent a new apartment, but she wasn’t expecting her ex to demand her truck as security! And in Case 2, two old friends came to blows after a night on the town, but was it justified? Judy has two rulings to make and, even more importantly, we have to judge the Judge! Because this is the only comedy podcast that judges America’s favorite least favorite TV judge!Enjoying the pod? Consider supporting us by sending a dollar or two our way at tiptopjar.com/judgingjudy. Or don’t. Whatever. I’m not your boss.In our first case, our plaintiff’s ex was willing to loan her money, but only at an absurdly criminal interest rate and only if she agreed to give him her truck as security. Now, he says she never paid him back — but she says someone else gave her the money, not him! Somebody’s not telling the truth; it’s up to Judy to decide who.In our second case, two men who are way too old to go out for a night of partying get into a scuffle over who should drive. But our defendant says that wasn’t the reason and that he was acting in pro-active self-defense. Plus, he says, the plaintiff is a con artist and this is just one more in a long line of scams. Who will the Judge decide REALLY won this scuffle?Ultimately, of course, it’s up to us to make the most important, the most pivotal judgement. We have to decide if Judy did her job. For over 25 years, Judy Shendlin has cast judgement on us. But now we get to decide if her behavior, her words, her actions, and her rulings really delivered justice. A pop culture icon and a multimillionaire, Judy got famous casting judgements on us. Now we get our revenge.Judging Judy is perfect for fans of podcasts like the Doughboys, All Fantasy Everything, and Cinephobe. It’s a one of a kind, incisive, clever and culturally relevant riot.
Transcribe →Judging Judy 34 - Six Day Squeeze Then Seperation
Apr 2700:31:24Tap to summarizeWe’re taking a trip back to 1998 this week with two cases about warring couples that have reached the end of their respective roads. The break-ups already happened; now it’s up to Judy to decide if our plaintiffs will get paid! Whether it’s because of a broken promise or a broken door, love is out of the question, but only the Judge will be able to say if money is still an option. And, of course, it will be up to us to decide if Judy did her job — if she’s innocent. Because this is Judging Judy, the only podcast that turns the tables on America’s least favorite, favorite TV judge. Enjoying the pod? Consider supporting us by sending a dollar or two our way at tiptopjar.com/judgingjudy. Or don’t. Whatever. I’m not your boss Our first case features a plaintiff who says she only gave up her life in Los Angeles because her new boyfriend said he’d support her in San Diego and that they’d eventually even marry. However, just six days after she moved in with him, they were on the outs and she found herself with no job and no where to live. She wants to be compensated for upending her life. He says she’s crazy and was in fear for his life. Will the judge see things her way or will she side with the defendant and decide that getting dumped doesn’t mean you get paid?Case 2 features an abusive boyfriend who wants history stuff back from his ex. Despite beating his then-girlfriend and breaking down the door of their former apartment, he says he just wants to be friends. Oh, and he wants back his computer and his grill, too. She says he’s in violation of his restraining order and, despite whatever she may have once felt for him, he’s a creep. I can confirm, he is a creep, but the judge will have to decide if that’s grounds for him not getting back his stuff.After all that, it’s up to us to pass judgement on the judge herself. For over 25 years, Judge Judy has been a household name, a pop culture figure like no other. Still revered for her no-nonsense attitude, Judy continues to pass judgement on Americans to this day.But what about her?Only now do we get to look at Judy and decide if she acted fairly! Only now do we get to look at Judy and decide if she delivered justice! Only now do we get to look at Judy and decide if she’s innocent! A comedy podcast without any equals, Judging Judy turns the paradigm upside down by reexamining Judge Judy, a cultural icon. Fans of the Doughboys, Comedy Bang Bang, the Colbert Report and pizza will love this podcast for its unique perspective, its unassailable wit and its incisive commentary on America and American society.
Transcribe →Judging Judy Episode #33 - the Bricker Picker Upper (comedy)
Apr 2000:28:30Tap to summarizeThings get violent this week on Judging Judy! Not only does a plaintiff lose her braids — her car gets smashed, too! Then, we’ve got a case about a no-good dog owner who didn’t even notice his dog was missing; yet, he still thinks he deserves to get paid!Will Judy side with the plaintiff who got busted up in Case #1? Will she side with the defendant from Case #2 who’s just mad because his dog got spayed?And, more important than any of those rhetorical questions, will we find Judy innocent or guilty? Because this is Judging Judy, the only podcast that turns the tables on America’s favorite TV judge. Support the pod(if you want!) — https://tiptopjar.com/judgingjudyOur first case features two feuding families and the fight that resulted after the defendants refused to leave the scene. The plaintiff says that their brawl resulted in both damage to her head and to her car. Now, she wants money for both. The defendant, meanwhile, says it was all just self-defense. It’ll be the Judge’s job to figure out who’s telling the truth and if the plaintiff is gonna get paid.Our second case is about a dog that got loose and the woman who brought it back to health. Naturally, she expected to be compensated for the vet bills that came with getting the Chihuahua healthy again. She wasn’t so lucky; instead, the dog’s original owner accused her of stealing the dog and wants to be compensated because had planned to breed the dog. Judy’s going to have to decide if the defendant’s been a good boy or if he should go to the dog house.And of course, we will Judge Judy! And it’s about time, isn’t it? For over two decades, Judy Shendlin has been a cultural force, casting judgement on American society without giving us a chance to judge her right back. Well, no more! We examine the cases, certainly, but we’re just as interested in Judy’s behavior, her actions, her temperament. Taking all that into account, we’ll issue our own ruling!A comedy podcast in the spirit of Cinephobe and the Doughboys, Judging Judy is a hilarious take on American popular culture through the lens of one its most lasting TV icons. Equally silly and incisive, Judging Judy challenges you to reexamine society, nostalgia and how we treat each other. Each episode contains a summary of the cases the judge saw that day, so even folks who have never seen the original TV show can get up to speed and start judging Judy themselves!
Transcribe →Judging Judy 32 - Bite the Hand That Bails You (comedy)
Apr 1300:27:15Tap to summarizeA government-supported vigilante got bit by an alleged crook — now he wants to get paid! Will Judy have sympathy for a bail bondsman who couldn’t do his job? Or will she see through his cocky demeanor and rule against this bumbling buffoon?And, what about Judy herself!? Will we find her innocent or will we find her guilty?This, of course, is Judging Judy, the only podcast that turns the tables on America’s least favorite, favorite TV judge. Support the pod(if you want!) — https://tiptopjar.com/judgingjudyIn a case for 1998, Gene, a bail bondsman, says he never got what he was due from defendants Eleanor and Frank. Plus, he says, Frank bit his finger, and that ouchie makes him sad. Frank says he wasn’t ever going to be able to pay for his bail and that Gene wouldn’t offer him any options to make sure his debts were covered. Plus, Frank says that Gene acted unreasonably by drawing a gun on him…and that Gene got what he deserved!Of course, Judy’s the only one who gets to rule on the case, but that doesn’t mean we don’t get to do some judging of our own! We’ll take into our Judy’s judgement, sure, but we’re just as interested in what she said, how she acted and if she behaved. If she delivered justice, then she’s innocent. But if not, she’s guilty!Judging Judy is a comedy podcast like no other; though, with that said, if you like things like the Doughboys, Comedy Bang Bang and the Righteous Gemstones, Judging Judy might be your next favorite podcast. With an acerbic approach to one of America’s biggest cultural icons of the last few decades, Judging Judy is an uncompromising look at society and how we treat others. Even folks who have never a single episode of the original TV show will enjoy Judging Judy.
Transcribe →Judging Judy #31 - Critical Drinking (comedy podcast)
Apr 600:31:43Tap to summarizeHe hit her so she dumped his stuff. Now Judge Judy wants them to get back together again! It’s a case of a marriage torn asunder and a judge who just won’t take no for an answer this week on Judging Judy!Our case comes from the bucolic days of March 1998, though our first case is set in seedy Las Vegas. An admitted alcoholic assaulted his wife after an argument and then left the house. She got rid of stuff after a few months; now he wants to be compensated. While the Judge considers his claims, she seems much more concerned with getting these two to reconcile. She’ll judge if he should get paid, even though she seems more interested in whether he’s going to get laid!Then, it’s our turn to decide if Judy is innocent or guilty. Frankly speaking, I’d rather judge if she’s out of her mind for trying to hard to make this relationship a thing again, but that’s not what we’re here to do. Our task is simple: examine whether Judy delivered justice. Was the show entertaining? Did her ruling make sense? Did she behave herself?We roll all of those questions, and more, up to come to a ruling of our own: innocence or guilty. For decades, Judy Shendlin has had an unavoidable hold on our pop culture. But while she had free rein to judge us, no body ever thought to hold court over her! Well, on Judging Judy, that’s exactly what we do. Fans of the Doughboys, Blank Check, All Fantasy Everything and Billy Gill will love Judging Judy, the comedy podcast that offers a critical assessment of pop culture in a biting, snarky, and unforgiving way. Social commentary meets comedy in the podcast that everybody’s talking about. Even if you’ve never seen Judge Judy, you’ll connect with Judging Judy’s unapologetic approach to reexamining one of our cultural icons.
Transcribe →Judging Judy #30 - Super Smash Neighbors (comedy)
Mar 3000:31:14Tap to summarizeThe only things these neighbors can agree on is that their friendship ended with a broken nose! This week on Judging Judy, we return to 2020, the most fun year on record, for a case of assault and battery …or was it self-defense? Judy will have to decide whether Kimberly deserved the brutalizing Carrie gave her! And we’ll have to decide whether Judy did her job, because this is Judging Judy, the only podcast that turns the tables on America’s favorite TV judge.Want to support the pod? Send a $1 or two to us at tiptopjar.com/judgingjudyKimberly claims that her neighbor Carrie attacked her solely for insinuating that she was on drugs. Kimberly claims she was just trying to help, especially as Carrie had consistently come to her complaining of drug use and infidelity on her husband’s part. But when Kimberly offered a drug test to finally get some answers, she claims that Carrie responded with a punch instead of a pee.If we believe Carrie, the punch came after Kimberly tried to have sex with Carrie’s husband. It’s a little hard to follow, but Carrie claims that Kimberly actually attacked her, and that the broken nose was the result of flailing limbs and self-defense. She doesn’t deny the nose was broken; she just says Kimberly had it coming.Judy will have to decide whether Kimberly gets a payday for her pain and suffering, but we get to decide Judy’s fate. Each week, we examine the judge’s rulings, certainly, but just as important we examine Judy herself. Her words. Her emotions. Her actions. Her demeanor.And if we found she delivered justice to her audience, we find her innocent. But…if not..Fans of podcasts like the Doughboys, All Fantasy Everything and Smartless will feel right at home with Judging Judy with its witty repartee, pop culture insights and fearless commentary. Like Stephen Colbert? How about yogurt? What about freedom? Fans of all three of those things will also love Judging Judy, a one of a kind comedy podcast full of laughs even for those who have never seen the seminal TV show.
Transcribe →Judging Judy #29 - Call Us By Our Name (comedy podcast)
Mar 2300:33:07Tap to summarizeAll they wanted to do was have a classic Vegas marriage -- but what they got was cheese and crackers….and only cheese in crackers! This week on Judging Judy, we bounce back to 1997 where we’ve got a case of two newlyweds who say their wedding planner ruined their big day. But were their expectations simply too high, especially for the pittance they paid? It’ll be up to Judy to decide they were hoodwinked or if they got exactly what they bargained for.And it will be up to us to pass judgement on the judge herself, because this, of course, is America’s favorite podcast about America’s least favorite judge, Judge Judy. Diane says her wedding planner made a mess of her matrimonial celebration. From the limo to the food to even getting their names right, Diane has a list of complaints as long as the train on her wedding dress. She claims Monique was incompetent and managed to tarnish the event for Diane’s friends and family.But Monique says that Diane got exactly what she paid for. In fact, out of pity, Diane even says she gave the bride extras to make up for the paltry big day. Monique values her business and won’t put up with her good name being dragged through the mud by this angry bride.Will Judy side with the newlyweds or the Vegas planners? Will she have pity on the bride who saw her big dreams wind up as little more than cheese and crackers? Or will she find that the planners were right: you only get so much when you spend so little on the big day?Most importantly, will we find Judy innocent or will we guilty? Will we find that she did her job or did she muck up everything?Each week, we take an episode of Judge Judy and turn it upside down. Sure, we’re interested in the rulings but we care just as much about the Judge herself. How did she act? How did she talk? What did she think she was doing?!Fans of the Doughboys, John Oliver, Stephen King and All Fantasy Everything will love Judging Judy, the comedy podcast that turns the tables…finally! For over twenty five years, Judge Judy was a cultural icon who got to judge us without any consequence. Well, now it’s our turn. Nostalgia. Zeitgeist. Social commentary. Judging Judy’s got it all.
Transcribe →