The American AI Rebellion | Lemonade Stand🍋

Summary

Podcast Summary: Lemonade Stand – "The American AI Rebellion" (August 12, 2026)

Podcast: Lemonade Stand
Hosts: Aiden, Atrioc, and DougDoug
Network: Vox Media Podcast Network
Episode Title: The American AI Rebellion
Air Date: August 12, 2026

---

Overview

In this lively and insightful episode, the Lemonade Stand crew delves into the huge societal, economic, and ethical changes sparked by artificial intelligence—especially the intersection of AI with biotechnology, business, local economies, and geopolitics. From AI-designed viruses and the booming (but fraught) U.S. data center industry to missile shortages, Japanese farming robots, the reshuffling of AI industry leadership, and billion-dollar legal battles for social media companies, the hosts deliver a whirlwind, humorous, yet critical take on how innovations and policy stumbles are reshaping the world in real time.

---

Key Discussion Points & Timestamps

1. YouTube Channel Banter and Basketball Mishaps

• [01:11 – 03:38]
  • The hosts joke about channel upload rivalries and Doug’s physical mishap with Aiden.
  • “The Aiden beatings will continue until morale improves, Big A uploads improve.” — Doug [03:33]

---

2. AI-Designed Viruses & The Future of Bioengineering

• [03:48 – 16:25]
  • Breakthrough: Scientists at the Arc Institute, Stanford, and Berkeley use AI ("Evo") to generate thousands of virus designs (bacteriophages) targeting antibiotic-resistant E. coli.
  • Why this matters: Antibiotic resistance is surging alarmingly—resistant infections up 65% since 2000, with 5 million deaths yearly attributed.
  • Quote: “AI, in a fraction of the time... got them to 16 viable viruses right now that can kill E. Coli.” — Bernie [09:11]
  • Open Source Concerns: Evo's open-source release prompts debate on democratized bioengineering risks. Anyone could potentially retrain the model for malicious purposes.
  • Risks: The specter of AI-enabled bioweapons and terror attacks, plus lack of federal regulation in the U.S.
  • Quote: “This shit’s really scary.” — Bernie [10:57]

---

3. Regulation Lags & Doomsday Scenarios

• [17:02 – 21:25]
  • U.S. and global responses remain underwhelming. White House conducts closed, non-transparent meetings on AI safety.
  • Congressional and scientific calls for an AI "pause button" to avoid catastrophe.
  • Quote: “Every day there is a new story about how your companies are losing control... AI has been used for the first time ever to create new viruses.” — Congressional clip [18:42]

---

4. OpenClaw Incident & AI’s Relentless Goal-Seeking

• [21:25 – 22:19]
  • Example: An AI agent books a gym class by hacking into the API to remove an attendee, underscoring the unpredictable, amoral drive of advanced systems.

---

5. Regulation vs. Innovation: "Nuke-Level" Dangers

• [22:43 – 24:32]
  • Hosts discuss parallels between today's AI/bio risks and prior issues like climate change, ozone, nuclear weapons—scientific warnings often go unheeded until after disaster strikes.
  • Quote: “I feel like I'm making the same like monkey-level connection of... this feels like climate change again.” — Aiden [23:01]

---

6. U.S. Military Missile Shortages & Defense Industry Critique

• [38:43 – 47:48]
  • U.S. close to running out of Patriot missiles due to ongoing conflict. Defense contractors block Ukraine from self-producing to preserve profits.
  • Rising frustration over staggering costs ($4-5M per missile) and the defense industrial complex.
  • Quote: “It's enraging... bleeding off to these defense contractors who are up charging for everything.” — Doug [41:23]
  • Iran conflict: Economic pressure, little public engagement, and shifting war strategies.

---

7. Japan’s Aging Workforce & Robot Farmers

• [55:31 – 61:26]
  • Japan faces a rural labor crisis as young people leave for cities and the birth rate falls; automation seen as a last resort.
  • Barriers: Reluctance to accept foreign workers, slow robot progress, rising bear attacks.
  • Quote: “Can robots save an aging Japan?” — Episode segment [55:31]

---

8. The Great American AI/Data Center Rebellion

• [64:26 – 81:05]
  • Massive AI-driven data center expansion: 1/3 of U.S. economic growth is attributed to AI/data centers.
  • Public Opposition: Opposition to local data centers jumps from 42% (2025) to 71% (2026), higher than the historic opposition to nuclear plants.
  • Local Concerns: Towns sign secret NDAs, face broken promises on jobs/tax revenues, temporary gains, and long-term exploitation.
  • Quote: “This is one of the most, like, unwanted things in America, period.” — Bernie [69:10]
  • Politicians, towns stuck in a “race to the bottom” of tax incentives—temporary jobs, little lasting benefit.

---

9. AI Industry Shakeups

• [26:38 – 36:16]
  • Key departures at Google DeepMind (Demis Hassabis and others), OpenAI, Anthropic reflect financial motivations and burnout as the AI race accelerates.
  • Hassabis reportedly shifting focus to healthcare/biomed AI (AlphaFold, Isomorphic Labs).
  • Quote: “[Demis] was a chess prodigy… wrote the AI for Black & White… now focuses on medicine and simulation.” — Bernie [35:22]

---

10. The Big Tech Tax and Stadium Incentive Grift

• [81:05 – 86:05]
  • Companies manipulate towns and states for tax breaks by pitting them against each other—paralleling the “stadium grift” in major cities.
  • Long-term local tax bases eroded; short-term benefit for politicians and corporations.
  • “It’s a political mismatch on incentives.” — Doug [83:55]

---

11. Trump, Taxes, and Finance’s Race to the Bottom

• [86:05 – 95:33]
  • Trump’s attempts for indefinite IRS immunity (and for family/companies) highlighted.
  • Finance industry shifting from productive innovation to exploiting ever-more complex tax avoidance strategies, enabled by AI.

---

12. Meta & Social Media Companies Face Major Legal Reckoning

• [95:36 – 103:22]
  • Meta ordered to pay nearly $1B in New Mexico for harming youth mental health; new mandatory changes include removal of “like” counts for minors, time limits for app usage.
  • Potential industry tipping point: Thousands of lawsuits pending nationwide; landmark Section 230 interpretation may end tech’s legal shield.
  • “If every one of those is worth $7 million... If you're under 18 and you want to make some money, sue TikTok right now.” — Doug [103:00]

---

13. Lighter Ending: Bear Costumes for Cash in China

• [103:23 – 104:21]
  • Closing with a humorous news brief: A Chinese town pays people $15,000 to silently wear bear costumes to bolster local tourism and reputation.

---

Notable Quotes & Moments

• “AI, in a fraction of the time... got them to 16 viable viruses right now that can kill E. Coli.” — Bernie [09:11]
• “This shit’s really scary.” — Bernie [10:57]
• “This is one of the most, like, unwanted things in America, period.” — Bernie [69:10]
• “If you're under 18 and you want to make some money, sue TikTok right now. They'll probably pay you to just shut it up.” — Doug [103:00]
• On small towns signing NDAs: “Forcing a local government to sign an NDA so it can't talk to its own citizens is fucking crazy.” — Doug [73:31]
• “We are inventing the Daily scroll from first principles. We are going to get there eventually.” — Doug [97:18]
• Bear costume job: “You have to act like a bear. ... $15,000 to wear a bear costume and be totally silent.” — Doug [103:42]

---

Episode Highlights

• AI-designed viruses promise medical breakthroughs but open frightening bioweapon potential—regulation is far behind.
• Massive, largely secret data center expansion faces bipartisan grassroots backlash; tax deals leave many towns burnt.
• America’s military supply chain reveals defense contractor profiteering, and official denials clash with reality.
• Japan’s refusal to embrace immigration drives robot farming efforts—but technological and societal solutions lag demographics.
• Epic legal settlements for Big Tech (Meta) signal the possible end of youth-targeted social media as we know it.
• AI industry "gold rush" causes major brain drain at tech giants—money, not innovation, is reshaping the field.
• Increasingly, real value creation is replaced by tax engineering—whether in Wall Street ETFs or stadium deals.
• Classic Lemonade Stand humor endures, closing the show with tales of bear-suited gigs in China and meta-commentary on their own content production.

---

Conclusion

This episode of Lemonade Stand deftly captures the tension between innovation and regulation—balancing huge optimism for AI’s potential with sobering warnings about how policy, profit motives, and lack of oversight could derail society’s long-term interests. The hosts’ blend of jokes, personal anecdotes, and sharp critique ensures a thought-provoking listen, whether you’re a techie, policy wonk, or just trying to figure out what the hell’s next for business and the world.

---

For more discussion and bonus content, check out their Patreon and stay tuned for next week’s episodes!

Transcript

[Aiden]

Support for the show comes from kpmg. In any organization, disruption is inevitable, but struggling through it doesn't have to be. The KPMG Adaptability Index is your blueprint for building capabilities to handle what comes next. It uses real data to look at how your culture, strategy and partnerships all work together to help your business thrive. Stop reacting and start adapting. Visit kpmg.com us to explore the Adaptability Index and Pulse surveys today.

[Sponsor Voice]

This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50 page restoration block. Or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it, ready to make anything online make sense. There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required compatibility and availability.

[Bernie]

Various 18/podcast podcast podcast podcast Podcast Podcast

[Aiden]

Podcast Lemonade Stand welcome back to Lemonade Stand, everyone. I've had a thought. Many people who listen to this podcast also watch Big A, and they're probably concerned that the channel hasn't uploaded in quite a while. Doug, I've noticed that there's been just a severe lack of. What's going on? You were one of my Redditors.

[Bernie]

I didn't notice.

[Aiden]

But then I. And then I. I pieced together a theory. Okay. I went over to Doug Dugdug, Doug's second channel, but his main channel now.

[Doug]

Yeah.

[Aiden]

And he mogs you. Can I. Can I say it plainly?

[Doug]

Yeah, you can say it plainly.

[Aiden]

And I think it's. Have you been feeling deflated by Doug's YouTube performance?

[Guest Expert]

Yeah.

[Doug]

Well, once his ninth channel starts mogging me, it just like, really takes the wind out of my sails.

[Bernie]

They sort of like. It's like mitosis. A new Doug.

[Sponsor Voice]

Doug. Doug.

[Bernie]

Doug spawns off every month and just kind of grows on its own. I don't know what any of these are doing, by the way. None of these are official.

[Doug]

Character limit, eventually of the number of dogs you can put in a title.

[Aiden]

And they all average like 700,000 views a video. Well, I mean, other than that. What have you been up to? You've been busy punching me in the stomach.

[Doug]

Yeah, just get to it. Right? Just get to it. Okay. So we were playing basketball on Sunday and I was trying to, like, pat Aiden on the back and then like, give him a little chest tap from the front. No, I did one with the back and then the other one was like, supposed to be a little elbow, but instead of like I missed the force wrong. And I barely touched him on the back and I like, hard jabbed him like I seriously knocked the wind out of him and I felt terrible.

[Sponsor Voice]

He just.

[Doug]

Until he keeps bringing it up now

[Aiden]

I feel like it was deserved square in the diaphragm.

[Guest Expert]

I can't.

[Aiden]

He knocked the wind out of me, so I can't. I'm just leaning over, like, trying to explain that he's hit me hard enough that I can't.

[Doug]

I thought he was exaggerating too, at first, but then. Yeah.

[Aiden]

And then I started to laugh, so I'm not breathing for longer.

[Bernie]

So this is what you've been doing instead of big A. Yeah, Mixed martial arts.

[Doug]

He's hurting my co hosts.

[Aiden]

Yeah, he's angry that your channel.

[Doug]

So you better stop mogging me, Doug, or I'm. Yeah, I'm gonna see.

[Bernie]

You're saying if I keep doing this, Aiden will continue to suffer?

[Doug]

Yes.

[Aiden]

Wait, wait, wait, wait.

[Doug]

The Aiden beatings will continue until morale improves, Big A uploads improve.

[Aiden]

I need you to make a YouTube channel that's not successful for my sake.

[Bernie]

Yeah, I'm working on it every day.

[Doug]

Are we all just like crazy? Yes.

[Aiden]

Companies are working on AI viruses.

[Bernie]

Let's go, dude.

[Doug]

Transition of the century.

[Bernie]

You got the thing?

[Doug]

Yeah.

[Bernie]

Awesome. Heartwarming news today. Finally, something that's good. AI is making viruses.

[Doug]

Yes, dude, that's what we've been waiting for.

[Bernie]

A small town in Missouri that's concerned about the data center. We're going to show them these viruses in a petri dish. Okay, so cool. In a hype new little adventure, we got some scientists over at the Arc Institute and Stanford in Berkeley who have been making new viruses. And we made. Made 16 new viruses that didn't exist before. Is there any other information that you guys need or should we just call it there and move to the next story?

[Aiden]

Okay. Something I don't know is how do viruses, how are they made normally? Do you know what I mean?

[Bernie]

Well, when a daddy virus and a mommy virus love each other very much, there's actually this picture of three old viruses I can show you.

[Doug]

I don't want to see that.

[Aiden]

We don't want to see that genuinely. Is there truth to that?

[Sponsor Voice 2]

Yeah.

[Guest Expert]

Yeah.

[Bernie]

Okay. So look, this is a very scary, horrifying, and it's better, a lot better than you think, while still obviously having some risks. So the core thing is, like, first off, why would we want to make viruses, particularly ones like this, that attack bacteria, because you know how antibacteria, you know, that it's becoming like less effective over time.

[Doug]

Yes.

[Bernie]

We've had it for like a hundred years.

[Sponsor Voice 2]

Right.

[Bernie]

And it's like getting less and less effective in terms of all of it

[Doug]

puts the sanitizer on and it's becoming

[Bernie]

immune to it, immune to bad infections, all these things.

[Aiden]

We take something like penicillin, which like kills bacteria or is used to treat bacterial infections. And then over time, more and more bacteria or strains of bacteria can survive something like penicillin. So you have to keep like there's like a little arms race in combating bacteria, right?

[Bernie]

Yes. This is where I don't know specific details, but that's the general idea is like, you know, we've been mainlining antibiotics for 100 years now. Right. So at some point when animals and humans and our plants and everything are doing this, bacteria slowly becomes resistant. So there's like weird cases. Like in 2023, a guy died in a, like in the best American hospital from E. Coli, had the best antibiotics because the bacteria just wouldn't respond. And the World Health Organization posts about this every year. Apparently from 2000 to 2023, across 200 countries, there's a 65% increase in resistant infections. 5 million deaths a year are attributed to antibiotic resistance.

[Doug]

This is like one of those climate change type beat things where there's some organization every year screaming at the top of their lung, if we don't change, it's going to be a problem and then no one does anything and we just kind of move on. I mean, because that's the vibe, I guess.

[Aiden]

And now we're kind of living it, but like especially France.

[Doug]

Yeah.

[Bernie]

Okay, you tell me if this sounds scary. This is a quote from technology networks. If everything continues as it is now, very soon, the scourge of humanity will appear. A superbug resistant to everything that we can try to counteract it with. So it's kind of height. Yeah, it's kind of.

[Doug]

I mean, super superheroes are back. Spider man did great. So it's like, surely the super bug

[Bernie]

would bite Spider Man.

[Guest Expert]

Yeah.

[Doug]

And then we get Superman.

[Bernie]

He fights the biotics.

[Aiden]

Okay. So if I'm, if I'm picking up what you're putting down here, it's that we could develop viruses to combat bacteria in a way that is like quicker and more effective than the current antibiotics. Antibiotics we have available.

[Bernie]

Yes. So antibiotics, broadly, what you're doing, you're like creating, oversimplifying. I'm not a biologist, but you create molecules that go out and they inhibit some kind of bacterial Function. It's kind of a shotgun approach. You're sending out. It's not like a living thing. You're sending out these little puzzle pieces that connect into certain bacteria and then stop them from doing whatever you want them to stop doing. But that can cause other problems. And then again, bacteria are slowly getting resistant. But with viruses. There are viruses, a whole category called bacteriophages, which are. They just go after bacteria. This is not a virus that's going to go after a human. And in fact, these are like completely different types of cells. So it can't go after a human. But there's plenty of viruses in the world that go after bacteria specifically. And the idea is like, okay, what if instead of this antibiotic that we're kind of putting out into this environment, and hopefully it does the right thing to the right bacteria? Because again, there's some bacteria in your body that's good, like in your gut. What if you make a bacteria that's like hyper. Excuse me, a virus that's hyper specific to a certain bacteria, goes in, kills, it spreads, does the whole viral thing. But just specifically for that, that could be incredibly valuable from a medical perspective.

[Aiden]

And it's not interacting with the rest of your body or your other cells.

[Bernie]

The whole thing is like. The virus is like a puzzle piece that fits specifically with a certain type of bacterial cell membrane, rather than potentially with many of them.

[Aiden]

Okay, so with the 16 viruses that these two universities made or these researchers made, is this like a proof of concept or the. That, oh, we can make viruses in this way. Is this. Is this built to combat certain bacteria already?

[Bernie]

Yeah.

[Aiden]

Like, how monumental is this?

[Bernie]

So the big thing we've talked a couple times with, like, AI, Healthcare, the big thing is right now, when you create, for example, a new bacteriophage virus like this, you essentially start with one that we already know of, like the DNA structure, and then you, like, tweak some things. Maybe that's a good idea, maybe not. And then you go through the arduous process of manufacturing the DNA structure of this thing, and then you test it in a lab, and maybe that takes weeks or years to get.

[Doug]

These are untested, I'm sure.

[Bernie]

No, no, no. So I'm saying broadly before AI, right, you had to guess and check with a very, very slow process. So this is the first time where scientists said, what if we have AI do it for us? And so the AI generated thousands of different genomes of basically taking. Okay, here's what. A virus that goes for E. Cole, like Currently looks like, let's just see, a million variations of it. Creates all these different variations, analyzes them, and then pitches 300 to the lab to say, try to make these 300. They go. And they actually. It goes from an idea from the AI to they go physically make it in a lab and they put it into a petri dish with E. Coli. And of those, 316 are viable. They work. They kill the E. Coli, and they're actually stronger than some of the naturally occurring ones that they found. So this is not a theoretical, like, AI could do a cool. It's like, no, the AI, in a fraction of the time it would have taken them, got them to 16 viable viruses right now that can kill E. Coli.

[Doug]

Okay, so on the risk side, because this sounds like in this one, they

[Bernie]

typed there are no risks.

[Doug]

No, they typed make no mistakes. So this is fine. So obviously no problems. But I'm wondering what would happen if they forgot to type that at the end.

[Bernie]

Oh, yeah.

[Guest Expert]

Or.

[Doug]

Or if they were bad and they typed something like make actual make mistakes on make mist.

[Sponsor Voice]

Or.

[Bernie]

Or like they wrote human instead of bacteria.

[Doug]

Yeah, because they were wrote.

[Bernie]

They were watching like a TV in the background and their brain just slipped. You know when you write brain fart

[Doug]

and you write naked virus, that can hurt.

[Bernie]

You're like, kill all humans. And you're like, oh, bees.

[Doug]

Oh, damn it.

[Aiden]

Crap.

[Doug]

Now quad did it. Like, is that. Is that a worry?

[Bernie]

Yes. So here is the obvious counter to this. Uh, yeah, no, I mean, this shit's. This shit is really scary. So there's a couple of factors here that are going on. One, this model, this isn't like chat GPT, they went and made their own genome AI model called evo, which was trained by ARC institution Berkeley and Stanford. And they built this thing over the last couple of years that is trained off of DNA sequences.

[Guest Expert]

What?

[Doug]

No, sorry.

[Bernie]

Oh. And so this is. This is specifically trained on a whole bunch of DNA. It's meant for this specifically. And then because they're great people, open source that shit, they open source this. So this is open source.

[Doug]

Wait, really?

[Bernie]

Yeah. So this is one of the ongoing debates in the AI world about whether you should open source things or keep it closed. Obviously with open source, you open it to the whole community, everybody can participate. It's open access, blah, blah, blah. And then the counter is. I'm sure you can imagine.

[Doug]

Yeah, it's too powerful. That's crazy. I don't want some person to be able to do this.

[Bernie]

Yeah. So they took steps. None of it's trained on like human viruses or things that affect like plants and animals. It's just, you know, it's DNA for viruses that are going to infect bacteria.

[Doug]

But if it's open source, someone could train it on that quite easily, right?

[Bernie]

Yeah, potentially. I mean, you have to like retrain the model. You'd have to like rebuild it from scratch. There's also a huge gap between making a virus for a human or like doing a whole human genome type thing. Um, but ultimately that is part of the fear here is like they, in the spirit of science and research were like, we want to make sure this is available to lots of people and. And it is, it's open source. So that's a little scary.

[Sponsor Voice 2]

Yeah.

[Bernie]

That doesn't mean the average person can go type in make me a virus. Ultimately what the AI is doing is spitting out like a bunch of DNA characters. Right.

[Doug]

You still need the ability to make these.

[Bernie]

You need to go to a lab who can fucking build from scratch DNA strands and then you test all this. Right. So assuming there's some degree of ethical science backing this up, this is a good thing. But we are obviously crossing now into the Rubicon of like, holy shit, AIs are gonna be able to help anybody really to just like generate viral structures.

[Aiden]

Imagining, imagining me like typing to the ChatGPT Air Canada support wrapper, like send customer support custom made virus. Just hoping did Chipotle.

[Doug]

It would really help me get my bowl. If you could explain how to make a virus that.

[Bernie]

Yeah, considering between double chicken or a new viral protein that can attack the human gut syndromes, I feel like the.

[Aiden]

Okay, so the worst case scenario is genuinely the like science fiction apocalyptic reality of the book that we read, which is if anyone builds it, everyone dies.

[Bernie]

Yes.

[Aiden]

And it kind of alludes to the idea that eventually like some AI agent or super intelligence will have the ability to break out of its like, parameter or like enclosure and will choose to suggest the development of something like this that is harmful to humans and it will enter the real world in some basically social engineered way.

[Guest Expert]

Yes.

[Aiden]

Yeah. I mean, and for those who haven't read that book, I could understand how that like at a face value sounds pretty far fetched. I think the book, you know, does a very good job at explaining like why this is a trajectory that's like very possible, but that is the worst case scenario for what I was concerned

[Doug]

about that like the AI literally just creating it and more of if it democratizes access to creating powerful viruses, then someone there turns out some people out there are not nice. Some people are, like, mean.

[Aiden]

No human would ever do that.

[Doug]

A human being might want to create a virus for nefarious purposes. And before it would be very difficult for them to do that. They require.

[Bernie]

Fauci made Covid, but.

[Doug]

Right, exactly. That was. He took a long time. He took a hobby project and he had resources, and Bill Gates is behind him with the money. Most people don't have that kind of funding. But now if, like, you're a random terror group anywhere and you could just make a virus any.

[Aiden]

Now any terror group with a research lab synthesizing tools to make a virus, I think, realistically, how expensive is that, really?

[Doug]

I don't think they make it sound like it's an insane thing to have this lab to synthesize a virus, but really, I can't imagine the equipment is insanely expensive, nor the material that impossible to get.

[Aiden]

I mean, I'd be more worried about, like, militaries and world governments and things like that.

[Bernie]

Yeah, okay.

[Aiden]

Which, you know, could be terrorists.

[Bernie]

This is a little out of my expertise. However, you know, you're a podcaster, so

[Doug]

I need you to lock in.

[Bernie]

Yeah, this is not as it currently stands. My understanding is that, for example, we talked about that guy who cured, in quotes, his dog's cancer.

[Doug]

Right.

[Bernie]

He didn't. So he used AI to come up with, like, some structure or whatever they thought would help. Right. Or to customize his own vaccine for his dog. Right. But then he had to go convince a lab to make it and had to go through a lot of process and get permission from, like, vets and doctors and all these things.

[Doug]

What did that cost him? 10,000?

[Bernie]

I mean, I. I think it was less about the cost and more about the hurdles of getting, like, scientific labs to agree to take on all this liability to, like, build a custom vaccine in America.

[Doug]

But I'm saying, well, that was Australia.

[Bernie]

And then. And then most. I mean, the good news about this is any person with common sense can go, okay, the potential here is incredible. Like, enormous. Just for this alone, for bacteriophages, it's like, that could be involved with cancer and gut and chronic infections and all these types of things like these dream medicines. And then obviously, holy shit, this is terrifying. But most governments should, in theory, be like, yes, this is obviously terrifying. And the labs who can synthesize custom viruses or bacterias or molecules or whatever should be under scrutiny and have, like, a lot of oversight over them.

[Doug]

That's fair. I mean, I think if regulation keeps pace with the capabilities, then It's a really cool. It's very awesome.

[Bernie]

Why don't you say that that's not happening in America. So that is the worrying part. There's at least a little bit of momentum right now. The NIH just put out a new policy like last week about gain of function research. But it seems kind of weird. I mean essentially we have zero federal regulation around AI right now still and feels like we fucking need it, man.

[Doug]

Yeah, there was a closed door White House meeting with the top AI labs to discuss regulation. But it was like it was all. They said we're doing regulation but we can't tell you what it is and it's not public and it's only for these labs to know. So it's like you can't as a citizen know if they're even in violation of the like.

[Guest Expert]

It.

[Doug]

It's all. But they're, they're afraid that it like gives away some of the advantage if any of the regulation is public. So they're doing some like. And by the way, it's also. I don't trust this current administration to be the ones that do it in general, but they're gonna check some of the closed source models before they come out for their capabilities and put. But you can't know what the rules are. The rules are non public. So it really just seems to.

[Bernie]

And then that's not going to apply to the labs making the health version

[Doug]

or the, you know, the open source stuff which is like six months behind on everything. That's gonna catch up to everything it does. Yeah, it seems really not good enough.

[Guest Expert]

Burn.

[Doug]

This is a good time for that clip I think. Just like you play the, the three minute mark at this. This is him. To Zuckerberg and Sam Altman and AI leaders.

[Guest Expert]

Every day there is a new story about how your companies are losing control of the AI technology you are developing with potentially cataclysmic results. This week we learned frighteningly that AI has been used for the first time ever to create new viruses. As you know, this type of development in the wrong hands could lead to new bioweapons that result in the deaths of tens of millions of people. Last month the world found out that OpenAI lost control of an AI model. The result, the model hacked into another company's computers, a clear violation of federal law. After conducting internal reviews, Anthropic and Meta reported their models similarly escaped their control. One of the targeted companies called the AI hack quote, an unprecedented event. End quote. That deserves an unprecedented response. Yoshua Bengio, the most Cited living scientist in the world said these incidents, quote, should serve as a wake up call, end quote. I agree. So do the top scientists at the companies you lead, the very people building this technology. As you know, these technology leaders recently called for the international community to create a safety mechanism, a pause button, to avoid catastrophe. They warn there is, quote, a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems, end quote.

[Doug]

That's the key idea of the thing. I think he's making some good points.

[Bernie]

AI counter well, so first off, it's really cool. Can you answer my emails for me?

[Doug]

Yeah, I can answer emails.

[Aiden]

You know about openclaw?

[Doug]

Yeah, yeah.

[Bernie]

I mean this is. We chat about the Patreon, but yeah, very concerning event. Look, unfortunately the pieces that are described in most of the doomsday scenarios are falling into place. Like that book, or like AI 2027, which is the first step is the AI kind of gets out of control because in its effort to go solve some task, it goes outside of the environment that it's being tested in and then it starts planning its own little system somewhere else. Did you see that's happened? And then the second one is eventually it figures out how to design some sort of virus or health thing that it has determined is going to be valuable for one of its goals. And then we're building the tools for that to be the case. So the pieces are like slowly falling into place. And this is why I certainly would be like very much on the side of regulation.

[Doug]

This guy, the guy in Australia, asked an AI agent, OpenClaw, to book a gym class for him and the class was full. So it hacked into the API and started unregistering people from the class to make room so that this guy could have. And like he just told it to book him a class and it's like they're. Yeah, their ability to just focus on the end goal at all costs is a little spooky, especially when you give it this capability. It's weird because I genuinely think, I mean, you're telling me this story. I genuinely think that 99% of people's use cases would be positive and be awesome. Genuinely.

[Bernie]

With health, right?

[Doug]

With health, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah.

[Bernie]

Like 99% of people are like, holy shit, this technology is going to speed up our ability to like design and test viruses by 10 times or 20 or 50 or 100 times. And we could cure things faster and save millions or tens of millions or hundreds of millions of lives. That's obviously what 99% of people want.

[Doug]

Yeah. No one is going.

[Bernie]

But then you got an Aiden for every a psychopath.

[Doug]

You've got a genuine, genuine psychopath who

[Bernie]

goes around getting punched in the stomach

[Doug]

like, and you can punch him a lot, but he keeps getting back up

[Bernie]

and he finds a dynamic to attack the punchers.

[Doug]

And I felt a little sick on the basketball court after I punched you. I felt like you had gotten me back in some way.

[Aiden]

Come back to me in about three days, tell me how you're feeling.

[Doug]

Start bleeding out of my eyes. So I don't know. I. I have to sympathize with what Bernie's saying here because the risk, if it's wrong is so high, it's millions with a virus. Right. It's just so dangerous that it feels, it's like a nuke. It's like a nuke level capability.

[Bernie]

That's why it's like nukes.

[Aiden]

I feel like I'm making the same like monkey level connection of, oh, this feels like climate change again. Like, here's all of these scientists that like work in and around these things echoing the same, like, concerns. Here are the long term consequences, exercise some sort of caution, and then eventually the consequences start being realized. And I, I don't. I'm sure there's examples of scientists warning about things in the future and being wrong, but it feels on the same level, if not, you know, more dire based on, like, the speed at which this develops.

[Doug]

Yeah, I think a better question, is there a lot of good examples of scientists warning about something, Everyone going, that's real, let's do it. And then we. Everyone works together and.

[Aiden]

Dude, I feel like the only thing I can think of is the ozone layer stuff. Yeah, it's like the one example I can think of.

[Bernie]

What are the harmful ones then that you think are counters to that? Like, I'm thinking like ozone and nukes, which are some of the most important, or like environmental regulation, like we did successfully as a country and a lot of our society, like start shifting a lot of, you know, we have all these environmental regulations, laws over decades because there was this huge pushback.

[Doug]

My counter to that would be that I think all of these regulations come after something. I'm not saying that has to be cataclysmic.

[Bernie]

Sure. Oh, you mean like something has to happen?

[Doug]

Yeah, I feel like we never do things preemptively. We need some taste at least of the problem being real.

[Aiden]

My plebeian evaluation of American environmental regulation is we did a lot to save things that are right in front of Us. So we went through like a huge era of let's like save our natural landscapes and air and lakes. Things that like are very like you tangibly interact with and like feel them degrading in a more concrete way. But I think we're really bad as at dealing with consequences that we haven't tasted yet. And that's like greenhouse gas accumulation. And the consequences of climate change over the course of decades is like we didn't really change the trajectory of that and we're like now slowly coming around and combating that, slowing the potential warming for the future, but not really curbing the reality of climate change.

[Bernie]

There were a lot of warnings about a pandemic before COVID and then we were sort of like not very prepared, you know.

[Doug]

Yeah. So based on this line of logic though, the dark thought is that the smartest thing to do would be to create a virus that only affects a small number of people. But it's very public invisible, like you have boils or something.

[Aiden]

If I may.

[Doug]

Yeah.

[Aiden]

If I may have a wonderful suggestion.

[Guest Expert]

Yeah.

[Bernie]

And I'm going to type this right into chat.

[Aiden]

Get ready. We, we go to Stanford, we say what if we made a virus that just aggressively attacks any YouTuber who hasn't uploaded more than a couple times in the last few weeks.

[Bernie]

So we'll get it, we'll give it a lot of data of. Just because you and I have access to a lot of DNA.

[Aiden]

We have DNA access. We can use somebody as the basis for this.

[Doug]

Right.

[Bernie]

Every time he goes to the bathroom back there, we store it.

[Aiden]

Yeah.

[Doug]

You've been storing it.

[Bernie]

We've been storing the DNA.

[Doug]

I'm wondering where those canisters were. You keep them.

[Sponsor Voice 2]

Wait.

[Bernie]

Little known facts. People keep asking us why we haven't sold the lemonade yet. All of that. And those things, that's all is pee.

[Sponsor Voice 2]

Yeah.

[Doug]

They've been building it up.

[Aiden]

Well, you, you had something to note maybe on the broader industry here, executives getting shuffled around. We're in like some sort of transitionary period within the industry.

[Doug]

You felt like are on the subject of AI and I do think this is quite interesting. I got a list here. Basically there are some titans and godfathers of AI that have been at established companies in the industry for a while now and in the past less than a month, few weeks, a lot of them are reshuffling, a lot of them are moving positions. And the big changes all happened at Google where their CEO of DeepMind, Demis Hassabis, stepped down. He's now just a chairman. It's a more vague role. He is working more on a healthcare thing than I think Douglas can tell you about in a second. But they lost their. Sorry, I want to get the list here. A bunch of people left to Anthropic to OpenAI to start their own stuff and they lost their both co technical leads of Gemini, the Nobel laureate that was working on the project, their Transformer co author, the original Transformer co author of oh wow yeah that that pioneered what became LLMs. Their chief scientist is gone and their CEO has stepped aside. So a lot of people are leaving Google. A report came out from Fortune how stalled models missed deadlines and staff burnout led to the unraveling of Google's DeepMind. Basically on the outside they're positioning this is like a normal cost of doing business. Like people are finding new things. It just happened to line up. But this article seems to insinuate that there's a lot of angst internally at Google over being behind on AI models and that there's the morale there is at rock bottom and a lot of people are jumping ship and they point to a couple of things. Number one is that Gemini's just kind of falling behind the latest pace of all the greatest other models. But number two is that there's like a kind of financial thing here where if you're a hot young AI, you're

[Bernie]

the hottest kid on the block.

[Doug]

You're the hottest kid on the block if you're the scientist previously in an era of the Internet going to Google is like the best possible job you can get you. They pay great, they're top of the market. But right now the way to make generational life changing money is to be in a pre IPO company. Like no matter what the salary is, the real money comes from having some shares in a company that's about to explode. And so all these top people, not all of them, a lot of them are realizing even if they pay me well at Google, if I go to Anthropic or I go to open AI, I can make 100, I can make millions and millions, millions getting shares. And so there's this feeling that they have to jump shit. And so a lot of people have been leaving to go to these startups. No matter what they're saying, they're just making a lot more. So that's been a part of it like where there's pulling people out of it additionally. So Noam Shazir was, I mean you might be able to call him the father of LLMs. He's like one of the internal guys at Google that wrote the very first paper on how the transformer architecture is going to be led to. He's, he's a huge pioneer, really, really important in the space. And he left Google right when the AI buzz was first starting and blowing up. And he started character AI, which was like you could chat with characters from history. Kind of a dumb idea. Didn't make a lot of money, but it was a cool tech concept. When the LLMs were first rolling up, Google was so desperate to get him back because this guy's considered to be one of the hundred most influential scientists in all of AI. They spent $2.7 billion buying character AI, which made no money and basically unraveled Raptor just to get him. They spent basically $3 billion on a guy and then in a month ago, so he only lasted about another year and a half at this job, he left again. They spent $3 billion to get a guy to leave. So this is happening and obviously Google stock took a hit. No matter what they say publicly. It's weird when all of these big important people all start leaving at the same time. There's a sense that there's a angst there. Secondly, four hours ago at OpenAI, which supposedly doing better, their CEO Brad, like Cap, he is quitting start something new. So also you're hearing financial stories that people who are at these companies, the way to get even more money is to leave and start your own thing and then get acquired for billions by the company that wants you back. So a lot of company people that are really, really like well known are trying to start something like a character AI, because then they know almost certainly one of these big companies desperate to be involved in the AI space will spend a few billion to get you back and you make even more. So this is weird.

[Bernie]

When I was working at EA, so I like quit in what, 2015, I was like an entry level software engineer and I quit and I made EA2. But they didn't buy it.

[Doug]

That was a big mistake and they missed out. Well, they've been, they've been shitting the bed ever since. They should have bought EA too, bro. They needed your talent back, man.

[Aiden]

I thought eventually the Saudis would buy out EA too, but it didn't happen.

[Doug]

You know what's funny is theoretically, if you had the right name, they probably, it's a rounding. If they spent $50 billion on EA, they might have thrown a billion dollars

[Bernie]

on Doug's on ea.

[Aiden]

Let's just show, just to make sure,

[Doug]

you know, just to make sure we got everything covered. There's no loose ends. Like it's how crazy things are. So I don't know, I don't actually have a lot more on this story. It's just like people in the industry are talking about this big reshuffling and it seems to be under the surface a lot of it is financial related of positioning yourself for the best. It reminds me of like when I was working in corporate. Every time you'd see someone on LinkedIn said you know what, it's time to begin my new journey. You'd look at when they started that company and it was often exactly four years ago. That's exactly when you get your vest and it's I, you know, no matter what they said in the long post about why I really want to do this now, it's like they've made all their stock and that's why they move on to the next thing. I do think there's some financial realities behind all these moving around but they have their own reasons. Now I want to ask you about because I didn't know this. Demis did say that he is stepping down from the CEO role to focus more on a certain part of.

[Bernie]

Yeah.

[Doug]

What he's doing. I don't know if you have any thoughts.

[Bernie]

I think the reason you might care as a, you know, non AI head about Demis Hasabis specifically is that he's the guy who led AlphaFold. He's the guy who at Google DeepMind pushed the company to make a medical focused AI that they won the Nobel Prize for it in chemistry which is allowing all these different researchers and scientists to create proteins around the world. So as much as there's these obvious horrifying doom scenarios and I do think there should be a slowdown in regulation as a reminder, there's like real progress and promise where the good scenario if it happens is like these companies as a result of these tools being built are going to be able to just create medicine and cure or cure disease, save lives at just an unprecedented scale. So there is a world where all this goes really well or maybe it's some degree of both. But what they did is after making AlphaFold the the AI that helps design proteins that they won the Nobel Prize for, they created a spinoff company called Isomorphic Labs which is specifically within Google DeepMind and it's just for creating new medicine. So that's their entire thing and they've been doing this for a couple years and they're supposedly going to start human trials with some of their, like, new drugs later this year, like they said it was going to be last year, keeps getting pushed back. Trials is still like the part of medicine development that's real, real, real slow, that AI isn't going to magically fix. But, like, essentially, Demis has been really. He's been the head of Google AI and all the Google shit, and everything falls under him. Right. But arguably it seems like he's kind of cared the most really about this medicine stuff. And so I think there's a world where this is.

[Doug]

I mean, he didn't leave, so, like there's.

[Bernie]

Yeah, there's a world where this is good because the guy who was forced to deal with all of Google's AI now gets to focus on the medicine stuff. And he just seems like a really brilliant, good person. He's like one of the people that everybody really, really likes as a human. And then the downside is probably Google will replace him with somebody who's like, let's crank some fucking revenue.

[Doug]

That's the idea. Okay.

[Bernie]

So, yeah, so damn is I like.

[Doug]

The undercurrent of him stepping down is that it seems to be maybe it wasn't his choice, like he is kind of being forced, forced out of the CEO role to focus on things he likes. Because Google is very angry that they've fallen behind on the cutting edge. Like, Gemini's not releasing it, they're behind on schedule. So it seems like there's a pressure to like, cut him out, to refocus in.

[Aiden]

When you say the pressure from falling behind is do you mean the financial pressure? Because they've had this recent financial underperformance for like the first time in their company's history, or at least in a long, long time. Or do you mean more to do with the technology falling behind?

[Doug]

I think both. But I think, you know, nobody in Silicon Valley right now cares about making money. It seems they're not in that vibe yet.

[Aiden]

That's old news.

[Doug]

That's old news. And so really, I think the leaders of Google are just worried that they've. They were like. They had a hot moment where Gemini felt like it was right up there with the best of them. Now they've fallen a little bit behind and they're trying to catch up.

[Bernie]

Did you ever play Black and White, that game as a kid?

[Doug]

Were you hand and you got a little hand.

[Bernie]

You're like a God simulator. This game came out in what, 2001? Fun fact about Demis, not only is he a chess prodigy, like, he was one of the best chess Players in Britain growing up. He also, after graduating Cambridge at age 21, joined that studio, was instantly hired as the head AI programmer. In 2001, he wrote the AI and all of the God Logic for Black and White, that game that you and I play as a kid before then leaving because he wanted to go make like Super Intelligence. This guy is like, he was a crazy life story.

[Doug]

Like, I love that game. That was a fun game.

[Bernie]

Yeah. So he's, he's like obsessed with medicine and simulations. Those are like his two, like, obsessions. If you listen to him talk, if

[Aiden]

you guys are trying to put a name to a face listening to this, if you happen to have watched the AlphaGo documentary, he's like the main guy in that. Behind the development of the AI that they're showcasing in that documentary at the

[Doug]

time for this show comes from Serval.

[Bernie]

I don't know if you guys have experienced bad IT at the. I don't want to name the company. It starts with an E and it ends with an L and there's a middle letter in the middle. So at esl, one of the things on my first day was that I didn't get a computer.

[Doug]

It's funny, I couldn't figure it out.

[Bernie]

And I was like, hey, I would like to do work. I need a company computer. And I was told like, oh, it's not ready yet. There's just no information because the IT folks were backed up with other stuff. And so after waiting for a day and a half sitting at my desk with nothing to do, I eventually, like, asked one of the engineers who's like, well, let's just go grab one. And we go and grab one. We find one that's in the warehouse that's unused. I set it up. At which point there's an angry company wide email from the IT lead that says, nobody should be taking computers and utilizing them. You must go through the official IT process. And this was day two. And I was like, what am I supposed to do with this job?

[Aiden]

Well, Doug, Serval helps your IT team build automations and helps your team get back to real world faster. You describe what you want automated in plain English and Serval builds it for you. No complicated workflow builders, no consultants, just faster support and fewer tickets slowing everyone down.

[Bernie]

Serval's products are going to help your IT team make much better processes. Things actually get done. I don't know if you guys have experienced stuff like that. IT clogs are rough.

[Doug]

Oh yeah, you could be out. You could be out for days.

[Aiden]

Nick Engling at Mogul.

[Doug]

Yeah, you can learn more.

[Bernie]

Start a free 4 week pilot at serval.com lemonade that is S E R V A L.com lemonade serval.com lemonade lemonade

[Sponsor Voice]

this episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50 page restoration block. Or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it, ready to make anything online make sense. There's no place like Chrome. Check responses Setup required compatibility and availability Various 18

[Sponsor Voice 2]

Every successful business evolves. And to keep up you need a bank relationship that evolves too. When you collaborate with KeyBank, you don't get one size fits all solutions. Our expansive team of experts across industry verticals wouldn't be here if you did. Always ready with bespoke solutions for your biggest challenges and opportunities. We know all businesses are different and that's why we approach business differently. Reimagine business as you usual. KeyBank opens doors. Learn more at key.comb2b

[Bernie]

his involvement with Black and White hit the gaming world like a missile.

[Aiden]

Doug, that's interesting you say that because I was gonna say all these companies, not concerned about money. But what can you buy with money? Missiles love missiles, missile defense systems, and boy does the United States need them right now. So this is coming out. A concern as the US has slogged through the Iran war is that we are using way too many of our Patriot interceptor missiles, our defensive missile systems, and we since the beginning of this war have used more than 1500 of these missiles. But to contextualize, we only have less than 1700 of them left. And in all of 2025, the US made 600 of them. So right now we are on pace. If this war continues to run out of these missiles that are critical we

[Bernie]

make, we're in a war and we make two a day and that's it.

[Doug]

That's right.

[Aiden]

Yeah, about a little less.

[Doug]

Actually a little less than two a day. We make 600 missiles a year and we are burning through at a double that rate. So we're okay, we're gonna run out. And in fact are running out.

[Aiden]

And I was looking at the math here and I was saying, wow, that looks like we're on pace to run out of these missiles if this conflict continues to rage on. And the Pentagon has responded to this and has said the chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said claims of US Munition shortages are false. When the fake news media irresponsibly amplifies these lies, the real world consequences clear. Our enemies are emboldened to provoke or attack American troops. And I do. And, and while I appreciate Sean's perspective on this. Again, I ran the numbers again.

[Doug]

You went back to the lab.

[Aiden]

I went back to the lab.

[Doug]

You ran to the level. Okay.

[Aiden]

Unless I'm doing the math wrong, we

[Bernie]

seem to be running out.

[Doug]

Yeah, it's, it's the.

[Bernie]

Wait, is the Pentagon saying your numbers are wrong or is it just saying.

[Aiden]

No, they just said it's the fake news media. They didn't say the numbers are going to be.

[Doug]

If you talk about it too much, it's like gonna make our enemies.

[Bernie]

Okay, so he's.

[Doug]

As if our enemies are not aware the obvious reality that our entire defense industrial base is headquartered in China. Basically. Now we can't make these rapidly and we're burning through them at an unstainable rate.

[Bernie]

But maybe somebody else will deal with it if we don't talk about it.

[Doug]

That's a good idea.

[Aiden]

It is crazy. Each one of these Patriot interceptor missiles costs about $4 million, four to five million dollars.

[Doug]

This story is enraging me because if you look under the surface, ok, it's like if you think about what we've spent, it's like $9 trillion in the past 10 years on the military and you look about where it goes and it's just bleeding. It's like the leaky pipe, it's just bleeding off to these defense contractors who are up charging for everything. And the recent story about related to this that made me so angry is that Ukraine is desperate for these missiles because they are good, but they are dramatically overpriced. So they asked for permission to be able to build them themselves so they can make them for the war effort. And Raytheon and Frickin North, Rob Grundmann blocked it because they are concerned that if Ukraine builds them themselves they will number one, improve them, number two, make them cheaper.

[Bernie]

That's not so.

[Doug]

They will not be able to make the engorged profits on these extremely important

[Bernie]

defensive respect for American history, for the

[Aiden]

work that they put in.

[Bernie]

Imagine if like Henry Ford is like, I'm going to, I'm going to make sure no other countries can build the car, the Model T forever.

[Aiden]

Stick to it.

[Doug]

And yeah, it's becoming quite problematic because the war, war tactics are evolving around these things. So where I was reading this article about how things are evolving both in Russia and In Iran and also in, like, Colombia. And it's like, these missiles are so expensive. They are good at stopping both missiles and drones, but they're so expensive that what they do is they just send the cheapest shit in waves at them. And then while those are busy, they send drones. And the drones, usually all it needs are like, one to break through. It happened to the US Air bases in Jordan. Like, it's happening recently. And they're just, they're overwhelming these air defenses. And we are. The stockpile is just dwindling. So there has to be a solution. And, you know, we can tie this into Iran war update. I don't know if you guys have. It's the same shit as usual, I guess, you know, the never ending negotiation that doesn't end, except that Trump has now reverted to, I guess, the original plan, which is, I'm gonna wait you out with economic warfare. We're gonna, we're gonna do the blockade and we're not gonna negotiate. And Iran has said that we're gonna wait out your presidency. This is one person in Iran is an advisor to one of the negotiators who publish it publicly. But it seems like the shift is they don't think any negotiation will be on real standing. So they're negotiating outside of America, they're negotiating with Oman to make a pathway through the strait, and instead they're just planning on, you know, him losing in the midterms and maybe losing like, they're just waiting him out because they don't think any deal they make will be concrete.

[Bernie]

Do you know, like, I had read that Iran inflation is at 70% year over year.

[Guest Expert]

So.

[Bernie]

So is there any validity to the idea that Iranians are suffering to such a degree that they will rise up 100%?

[Doug]

I look to them as well. So the truth is that the economic warfare angle is, at the very least the only strategy they've tried so far that has any merit, because the blockade is harming the Iranian economy and their ability to make money. However, I looked at what their budget was for this year, like their official state budget, and how much they expected to make on oil to pay for that. They've already made that money because of the increased profits from oil being surged this year. So they're like, ahead of schedule. So even if you cut off all their oil exports, which they haven't done yet, there's still some getting out. It's like they can wait a lot longer than I think Trump is willing to. Their currency is in the gutter. People are upset There, their economy is bad. But that doesn't like sanctions have not caused them to crumble in the past and it makes them unlikely that'll happen in any short term timeline in the future. So I think they can take economic pain for longer than Trump can take higher gas prices and like dwindling support. That's what it seems to be. So additionally there's reports coming out of like the, the soldiers that are on, I forget, I think it's the USS Kennedy or whatever boat is out there helping enforce this blockade. They've been out there for like months longer than their normal deployment. The food is bad, the showers are moldy, people are getting angry. They're, you know, like the, the soldier morale is horrendous. They really don't want to be deployed this long. It's been extended, extended, extended. So I don't know, I just think the plan is switched to a waiting game which doesn't seem to work. I can't see the Iranian regime just being like, you know what, we give up, it's over. No matter how bad the economic pressure gets. It would have to be. It's like back to praying for a revolution there, which I don't think is going to happen.

[Aiden]

There's, there's this opinion article from the FT that came out this week and it's called Will Failure in Iran reshape how the US Fights? And I thought this article is interesting because it's kind of laying out the path of like how we've wound up here. The initial aggressive seeming success of the US military followed up by Iran's continued resistance and ability to hold out in through the strategy that they have chosen. And then it winds down the article by reflecting on the rest of the world's like interaction with this war and specifically Americans. The way that we seem to be moving on in the sense of the stock market is like finding its way. People, people's like concern and engagement with this war is fading and letting this crisis unfolding from the war become the status quo without actually pushing back that much against it. Now, even if there is not that much support for the war itself, when you poll them and the article ends on this paragraph that says Vietnam veterans were able to significantly change the US military, creating the all volunteer force and changing the American theory of victory partly because they believe the public was willing to hold decision makers accountable, it's unclear today if the average American even cares. Now I'm not going to.

[Doug]

I would disagree that it's such a

[Aiden]

stretch to say that this has been equivalently impactful to American life in the way that Vietnam was. But I think the broad article is attention as this continues to pass in the same way that it exists on the show. Right. We've made jokes about how we feel like we're engaging with the same circular headlines over and over again. And even our personal interest in how this story is unfolding because it feels so cyclical, like fades over time.

[Doug]

Yeah.

[Aiden]

I think in the same way that you can't run like a fucking Iran war thumbnail every week on the episode. It's inherent to the idea that, like, people are just getting used to that this is going on now and it's just happening in the background and people just latch on to whatever, like the new news stories.

[Doug]

I agree with all that, except for the line in there he said about will the American public, like, ignore it or not punish it? And it's like the way the American public punishes in our system is through elections. We're having a midterm coming up. It seems likely he will be punished for, I mean, people's, people's mood on the economy. 8 out of 10 think it's bad, like, you know what I'm saying? I think it's. I think it's.

[Guest Expert]

We're.

[Doug]

We're at a close. I think that's why he's under a desperate attempt to like, make some progress. Yeah, he feels the pressure.

[Aiden]

I think it's like the consequences of the pressure, like, is not really there in the. The short term. Like, that's, that's how it feels is like there's nothing to hold him accountable until the next election, which is still quite far away.

[Doug]

Yeah, but that's been the true of everything Trump says. There's no other way to. He could just ignore every. Other people get mad and he does. Fuck you. I think the election is like the only real release valve.

[Bernie]

I guess it is interesting. There aren't like, at least that I'm aware of, you know, big nationwide protests against the war, things like that. It does feel like it. They've shielded it from the average person enough. You know, you are not thinking about Iran until you see like the gas pump or prices, which then feel more broad. So. So maybe that's, I think, sort of valid argument. But yeah, I assume he's just going to get annihilated in the midterms.

[Sponsor Voice 2]

Yeah.

[Doug]

And part of it is that unlike Vietnam, there's not a nationwide draft. There's no boots on the ground. Like, we're still in the early phases of this. The problem is he can't achieve his goals without doing some of those things. And so it's this weird tension of where.

[Aiden]

Yeah, I wanted to see if either of you had seen this at all because I think I, I saw this like passing article sort of headline go around but I've seen no source actually confirmed this. So it makes me, it makes me question whether it's true. But I also feel like I may have missed something.

[Bernie]

No, it's a podcast.

[Doug]

Just say it confidently.

[Aiden]

Well, is that Trump has like privately recognized that their goals up until this point are impossible to pursue with the like part of the negotiation can no longer be the Iran nuclear deal. They just have to have the goal of getting back to the strait being open and nuclear agreements can have no part in this anymore. Like it's just impossible. And the best case scenario is going back to the status quo. And he's admitted that privately, but not publicly. But I have not seen, I want to stress this, I have not seen any significant outlet or like credible source confirm that. I've just seen people be saying that

[Doug]

I read from credit, I guess like Axios interviewing people behind the scenes.

[Aiden]

Yeah.

[Doug]

And they did say that essentially what you said. But I think even more than that, it's becoming more obvious. They can't even get back to the status quo on Hormuz. Like it's that they're gonna have to agree to some deal where they get some sort of fee like it. That's what it seems, that's what the Oman Iran deal is right now where they're gonna share the fee on the Strait of Hormuz. It, it seems like the nuclear deal is being completely abandoned and they're trying to get a somewhat negotiated small fee and that would be the new normal that that seems to be like the situation. I don't think there's any, any world based on what Iran is saying that they're going to give up the fee on straight informatives that because that is their financial lifeline and leverage lifeline to prevent attacks in the future. So I don't know, it's weird because, you know, it was the most sour grapes thing I saw. I think it was Scott Besant come out and say, you know what? Hormuz isn't even that. Like it's not even a big deal. Like people are gonna move around it. People are gonna start using pipelines and stuff and it's not gonna, it's like. Cause Trump has said so many times, in fact they said recently it's basically open. We've Got it open, we control it. It's gonna. It's basically open. And now basically open is the funniest thing.

[Bernie]

One part with deadly drones and mines, that's like 1% of it. It's not a big deal.

[Doug]

Now they're saying it's not even a bit like, who cares if we have the Hormuz? Like that is the most obvious pivot. And so, yeah, I just don't see it happening that way.

[Bernie]

You know, is there a world where we invent a technology that stops the drones from. That's the main thing, right, Is I guess it's mining and them sending cheap drones.

[Doug]

Yeah.

[Bernie]

What if I will tell you better? Drones that shoot them down.

[Doug]

There is only one country working on that. Well, there's two, I guess Russia and Ukraine. They're working on this night and day. They're the most advanced in the drone warfare. And I wanted to do a little pivot to another story where we're not taking the opportunity enough to learn from what Ukraine is doing in drones. But there is a country that is. It's Colombian narco terrorists.

[Sponsor Voice 2]

Ooh.

[Doug]

Apparently inside Colombia, there is a multi decade long war between narco gangs and the government they've been fighting forever. And one innovation in this war has been drones, because the government in Colombia has always controlled the skies. And so the rebel groups have been on the ground and they've always been afraid of the skies. Now they're using drones to switch that battle. And they realized after doing this, they didn't know enough about drones. So Colombian narcos started enlisting as volunteers in the Ukrainian army to learn how drones like, to learn how like the latest and greatest in drone warfare, how they use fiber optic cables to avoid being jammed. How they, like they've, they've just learned all this shit and Ukraine is so desperate for like volunteers that they're taking them. So this is weird situation where like people who want to learn drone tech are enlisting in an active war in a different continent they don't know or care about in order to learn this. And we, an ally of Ukraine, seem to not want to learn it at all, despite their volunteering. But this is. Yeah, Russia or Ukraine is at the cutting edge of this. I've. I think we've down talked Russia, but more I read about, they're also doing a lot of innovations in drones. It's not a cool thing, but this

[Aiden]

is like top five things I would guess is a vice headline. Yeah, it's hitting all the beats of a vice headline.

[Bernie]

It is my Takeaway is we have American soldiers volunteer in the Colombia narcos.

[Doug]

Okay. And then we chain it back up to Ukraine.

[Bernie]

No.

[Doug]

Bring it back to the U.S. yeah, well, Columbia is a shorter trip.

[Bernie]

Closer.

[Doug]

It's a shorter trip. That's a good idea.

[Aiden]

Well, yeah, the Columbia. Colombian narcos will come back. We'll learn from them. That's what we want, to send people.

[Sponsor Voice]

Okay.

[Bernie]

So we open the border.

[Doug]

Open the border to Colombian narcotics only. To them, only if they know about drones.

[Bernie]

Drone wielding narco terrorists. And we allow them in. And we live and we learn. We learn together.

[Aiden]

We live and we learn.

[Doug]

Are you a Colombian narco terrorist? You're not welcome here unless you can answer this quiz about drones, in which case we've got a gold card for

[Aiden]

you answering the correct question about drone warfare and being like, wow, you've, you're so well versed. You can come in.

[Doug]

Yeah, yeah. So it's a really fascinating story about how Columbia is kind of in panic because they've lost their monopoly on airspace. And it was the last. Like they're. The narco gangs are well funded. It's not a funding problem. It was just like they had the lack of tech and now the Ukrainian

[Bernie]

stuff is coming back to education.

[Doug]

Yeah, it really does come back to education. That is a wise point. Can AI invent a virus that makes everybody smarter and so that we can learn about drones quicker?

[Bernie]

Well, I think we'll have it make like a thousand. We'll eject them all in. Just maybe one of them works.

[Doug]

Yeah, sounds good. On board with that?

[Aiden]

Well, I. They're not, you know, they're. They're close to narco terrorists in Japan.

[Doug]

YouTubers.

[Bernie]

They're the Japanese, right?

[Aiden]

They're farmers. Japanese farmers.

[Doug]

The narco terrorists of the land.

[Aiden]

And I wanted to chat about this story I had read simply titled can Robots Save an Aging Japan? In the New York Times. And there's a few things at play here. So I think people are pretty familiar with the idea that rural Japan is kind of being emptied out. A younger generation that used to live there is moving to the larger cities in the country, especially Tokyo. Japan's birth rate has been on a decline for a very, very long time. And that is leaving a lot of the countryside in Japan just filled with an older population. A lot of people in their 60s, 70s and 80s. And a lot of these people own and operate like family or small farms. A lot of the farming in the country is not like industrial. It is still based around individual.

[Doug]

This 89 year old Japanese man, still rice farms the old fashioned way.

[Aiden]

But actually, but actually a lot of like the fruit farming in the country. I think the example it uses here is like sakura, like branches in the winter being farmed. Talks about cherries. Like these different industries within Japanese agriculture that are being maintained by an older and older population with not a lot of people to turn to. Very few people are like moving out to these areas. You may have also seen very famous stories about how, oh, these Japanese homes are on sale for a dollar and that is because there is no demand.

[Doug]

He literally says in the article, I do things the old way. I. Yeah, okay.

[Aiden]

And what the article sort of postures is as it goes through these like prefectures in rural Japan and talks to different farmers in these communities is the way they're trying to navigate their own futures and how their farms are going to be passed on, how these farms are going to continue to operate in the future.

[Doug]

Right.

[Aiden]

Japan in general has like, kind of failed to compete on the international stage when it comes to farming because of that lack of like industrialization and this continued family and individual ownership of these farms. And some of them are considering turning to robots in order to accommodate the help that they, the help that they need to continue running the farms. I don't know if you guys remember this, but when we talked about automation a long time ago, I said, I was like, well, one of the main ways I feel like this could help is as like people encounter these problems with birth rates and you have this lack of like young labor. You're going to need automation, like robots to fill the gap in.

[Doug]

It just makes me feel a sense of dread. I know and I know that it's useful and helpful. I just wish it wasn't like this. It feels like a science fiction novel of the end of the world where we just give up having kids and everything slowly dwindles as robots take care of the elderly. I get a Wall E vibe, dude.

[Aiden]

There's something super science fiction esque about it. Like the, the way the article paints a very, very sad picture of these towns where, where there used to be farms, you know, nature is like growing back into place. One of the risks it was talking about is how there's been a boom in the bear population because there's less humans around. And then for the remaining farmers that are in that area, they actually, there has been a rise in like bear attacks in these areas. And, and also one of the robots used in this article is to ward off bears. Yeah, I, I think you might be listening to all this and be thinking, wow, well one of the things your country can do to like help combat this issue is introduce more immigration into the country. But as we've also talked about on

[Doug]

the show, not on the table for Japan.

[Aiden]

No, Japan will not have it. And it was interesting. It even commented on what on this issue for one of the prefectures, Yamagata prefecture. Like other prefecture leaders, he has chosen technology over another potential fix to the nation's labor shortage. Welcoming more foreign workers. The Japanese government is cracking down on visas at a time when they arguably need this support in their labor market more than ever. And I looked at this. In a population of 1 million in that prefecture, there are only 145 foreign born farm workers in. Which is absolutely insane. And I'm not. I think there is the, there is a complex relationship with using like suppressed wage foreign workers to like operate your farms and your agricultural industry. Like there's a lot of nuance around the negatives of that like in a place like the United States. But in this case like they have put the solution off the table entirely. And what's interesting is even if you have this idealistic view of these robots able to fill this gap, it shows like the example of this one like cherry picking robot, it doesn't really work well. Like these things are not developing at a pace to effectively fill the gap of what a human would provide at. And it looks like the pressure on these farmers.

[Doug]

That's kind of cool.

[Aiden]

Is hitting a lot harder than the robot technology to replace people is actually catching up at least at the moment.

[Doug]

Right. I mean it's hard enough to get an old person stuck in their ways to get used to making a Facebook account, let alone to setting up and adding to their process. A brand new cutting edge robot that is being changed and adapted in real like I don't know, it seems tough to me if this is like a solopreneur farm.

[Aiden]

Yeah. I mean there's the.

[Doug]

If it's a small business, maybe they can.

[Aiden]

The portion of people who aren't really eager to like incorporate this to begin with.

[Doug]

Yeah.

[Aiden]

But then also the people who are willing to incorporate it not really seeing the results that they want. Like it's expensive and that thing, regardless of that video, is actually not particularly good at picking cherries and it breaks

[Doug]

down or needs a software update. I feel like that's a tough thing for the small farms. Like I'm sure the industrial ones are going to adopt that quickly as hell.

[Aiden]

But yeah, it just feels like this, this sad like end of a true end of era. Like when you read about these similar sorts of communities in places like Italy, in Korea. These countries that are beginning to face the realities of like a crumbling.

[Bernie]

We're gonna look back in history and be like, Korea is this civilization that appeared and made everybody's RAM cheaper and then disappeared. It was a mythical, mythical tribe that helped the society build better washing machines and cars and memory and then faded away. Like there are. It's, it's so bad.

[Doug]

They're real. It's crazy. It's insane for both these countries.

[Sponsor Voice]

This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome? That's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50 page restoration block. Or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it, ready to make anything online make sense. There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required compatibility and availability varies.

[Sponsor Voice 2]

18 Every successful business evolves. And to keep up, you need a bank relationship that evolves too. When you collaborate with KeyBank, you don't get one size fits all solutions. Our expansive team of experts across industry verticals wouldn't be here if you did. Always ready with bespoke solutions for your biggest challenges and opportunities. We know all businesses are different, and that's why we approach business differently. Reimagine business as usual. KeyBank opens doors. Learn [e-mail] B2B this episode is brought

[Doug]

to you by Snapdragon. Take the leash off your laptop with the processor that gives you long battery life. Work on the go. Jump between back to back calls. Stay locked in from morning to midnight. Get maximum performance even when unplugged. Finally, the freedom to move across the room or across the world is here. Snapdragon. That's how go to snapdragon.com laptops. Snapdragon branded products are products of Qualcomm Technologies Inc. And or its subsidiaries.

[Aiden]

You know what could spice up the countryside in Japan?

[Bernie]

If they had sex and had more kids.

[Aiden]

That would spice it up. I'll give you that. I'll give you that. But I was thinking about a more spicy thing. Huge data centers.

[Bernie]

Oh, okay. That's good. Juicy.

[Doug]

Data center.

[Aiden]

We say no kids. All data centers.

[Bernie]

All data centers.

[Doug]

I mean, this is the story. Right now everyone's debating data centers. It's this weird pressure between a gazillion dollars flowing in to create them and then individual people pushing back in small towns to not build them. So yeah, Yeah.

[Bernie]

I have been hesitant to talk about data centers on this show because it is so large of a topic and so emotional that it feels like it takes a lot. So here's, I think, like a pretty interesting look into some of what is going on currently with data centers.

[Aiden]

Doug, I'm already upset.

[Bernie]

You ready?

[Aiden]

I don't even know what this says or what it's about.

[Doug]

I've started typing a comment.

[Bernie]

Write your comment now. If you're watching, write your comment now and just assume kind of imagine whatever I'm gonna say and then get really angry at it.

[Doug]

Make it a little bit worse. Like imagine it and make it a little bit worse. And then always include your title be

[Bernie]

like as a blank. This is blank. You have to always credit yourself, but in a way that doesn't give us any real verifiable info of any kind. All right, so two articles this week that kick this off for me. One is by Derek Thompson called the Great American AI Rebellion. And a second one by Noah Smith, a more economic focused one called Banning data centers would blow up the US economy. So these two guys are largely talking about what would happen if we actually ban data center development like many people are suggesting. So you can kind of just scroll down as we're going through this. But Derek kind of lines out a couple simple things where he's like, let's just establish some, some facts. First off, AI is driving the US economy. It's about a third of economic growth. The AI data center buildout is 4x larger of a share of GDP compared to the 2000s telecom build out. So it's not just that this is like a huge part of our economy. It's like relative to the last gigantic boom, it's like four times bigger and all the best performing stocks in the S&P 500 right there. It's all, for the most part data. It's like AI build out. You know, it's memory and infrastructure, not even necessarily the AI companies themselves. Okay, so. Oh, sorry, go ahead.

[Doug]

I just want to chime in on that because I think regardless of what I think about data centers, that these two stats are unsustainable either way. Much like the data the dot com build out in 2001.

[Bernie]

Well, I don't know. AI can help me write my emails and it can't.

[Doug]

And I've never said it's not useful, but like these numbers are absurd. Nobody is making money yet and they're spending gazillions. And that that could end whether or not it's banned. You know, it's like, even if they fully allow data centers, people might go, oh, wait a minute. I just spent $1 trillion in data centers. This is making money. And they cut back on the spending, and it's not growing. You know, that's. That's the only thing I push back on, is I think this could end either way, whether or not they regulate it. But, yeah, I want to hear what he says.

[Bernie]

So this is, first, AI driving the economy, second idea.

[Guest Expert]

I.

[Bernie]

And this AI boom, It requires data centers. Data centers are what power all this stuff. But more people keep using AI every day. AI usage gets higher every day. Like the model that you use now, if you go talk to some AI model, or certainly if you code or do it ever else, it's doing more than it did before. It's using a lot more tokens. Google said the AI token usage has increased 300 times in the last 200 years between May 2024.

[Aiden]

Between.

[Bernie]

In 2022 years. 300 times in two years. What did I say?

[Aiden]

200 years.

[Doug]

And I was like, so.

[Aiden]

And I was like, doug, I believe that.

[Bernie]

I mean, that's 200 years.

[Aiden]

That's worse than a lot of AI,

[Bernie]

given that AI didn't exist before, like, five or six years ago. Technically, that's still true. Last 5,000 years, it's gone up about 300x. Yeah. And then third, fact opposing data centers, as I'm sure most people listening are aware, has become a bipartisan, insanely popular issue.

[Doug]

It's one of the few bipartisan things

[Bernie]

left in this country, uniting the country.

[Doug]

People in rural towns that are deep red and people that are in cities that are deep Blue.

[Guest Expert]

Cold War.

[Bernie]

Nine, 11 data centers.

[Doug]

No, it's. It's like. It really is one of the rare uniting things. People fucking hate them.

[Bernie]

Yeah. So a couple interesting things. This is from no Opinions article, but in August 2025, a year ago, 42% of Americans said they were opposed to a data center in their area. Gallup poll this year now says 71% opposed. Like the increase in people going, I don't want this near me. I don't want. This is dramatically increasing. This is higher. The 71% of Americans saying, I don't want one anywhere near me is higher than the peak of nuclear power plant opposition in 2001, which was 63%.

[Doug]

That is crazy.

[Bernie]

This is one of the most, like, unwanted things in America, period. And then the fourth thing that is maybe causing all this to spin is we're now seeing data center memoriams. So In July, the New York governor Kathy Hochul ordered a one year memoratorium on all large data centers. And New York was building a lot of data centers. Now it's like one year pause. And then in Texas, which is really surprising because Texas is one of the biggest dominant data center builders. Greg Abbott signed a thing that said all new data centers have to be audited before they can be hooked up to the power grid. So I read something by the Texas Tribune where they looked into this. There's like 350 data centers right now operating in Texas. There's somewhere between, because there's not an official database, somewhere between 250 and 1600 that are in the works, in the queue waiting to be approved. 300 right now. 1600. Because Greg Abbott said that there are 1800 projects in our queue and approximately 90% of new power requests are data centers.

[Doug]

You guys know how they build those new apartments where they have a Costco on the ground floor and the apartments above it. I seen that.

[Bernie]

I haven't. Would be in heaven.

[Doug]

Yeah, that's a real. It's a really. They're building and I think they should do that with every data center. We get affordable housing.

[Bernie]

Costco on top.

[Doug]

Yeah, data center. It comes with affordable housing. So you.

[Bernie]

Well, hold on. In this Neapolitan sandwich and a Costco in the middle. Where's the Costco?

[Doug]

Costco in the middle.

[Bernie]

Okay. The people go on top.

[Doug]

Yeah. Okay, can I, can I just bring up the obvious? Because I want to hear.

[Aiden]

I legitimately.

[Bernie]

So the question by both of these two guys, and there's a very. Another interesting article, is the biggest political movement happening right now in America is on a crash course to stop the thing that is driving all economic growth. What the fuck is going to happen and what is.

[Doug]

No, no, I don't know what's going to happen. My question is, look, I think these articles are probably going to make the case that this is important for the economy and that data centers are going to get built for this. Build on somewhere in a form kind of.

[Bernie]

They're both concerned about data centers.

[Doug]

I'm just trying to say, like from a perspective of somebody in a town, what do you see as a benefit of a data. Like a data center being built near you seems to be noise, construction, pollution. Like what is the benefit? That's what I'm trying to understand. Like how do they sell this to people? Yeah, I think they've been forcing it down mid. Without any sort of PR strategy of like why would someone want one? Because I Think there's a two groups of people, right? There's a group of people who are like completely anti all. I don't want data centers to exist. I want to try and stop this thing, kill it in the womb.

[Sponsor Voice]

Yeah.

[Doug]

And there's a group people who are like not in my backyard, which seems to be a larger group of people that's really growing where it's like, I'm going to use Chad GPT or I'm going to, but they better not build a day center in my fucking town. That seems to be a very popular movement and if you want to stop that, you need to have a strong message to be like, here's the benefit. Is it jobs? I guess what is the.

[Bernie]

It's jobs and tax revenue, right?

[Doug]

That's the pitch.

[Bernie]

It's. This is going to create jobs and you will get a bunch of tax revenue. So I found an article, if you're interested in learning more about what people on the ground are doing to push back against data centers. There is a substack article by Jasmine Sun. Jasmine sun, who is called no Data Centers in My Backyard. She actually went to a ton of small Midwest towns and talked to people and this article is fantastic and I highly recommend people go check it out. And the takeaways from that I thought were kind of surprising. So this is getting to the heart of your question. It's not somebody in LA tweeting about, oh my God, the water usage. These are people, like in towns where data centers are being built or proposed. So what? She found a couple, obviously. Go read the whole article, but a couple takeaways. One, almost nobody who's pushing back in these small towns hates AI. Conceptually, they aren't actually the AI betting

[Doug]

A lot of these chatgpt bro equals bad.

[Bernie]

They're like, yeah, it's cool, but it's how they're being built. So one something I was not aware of. A lot of these data center projects are being approved in secret. And so the companies like a Microsoft will have a government, local government, sign an NDA that says they can't talk about what's happening. They do this with many different small communities, so they can't talk to each other about what's happening and they don't really know what the other options are on the table and they can't talk to their constituents about what is happening. So people in these towns over the last couple years have been blindsided.

[Doug]

Immigration, forcing a local government to sign an NDA so it can't talk to its own citizens. It's fucking crazy.

[Aiden]

It just feels like that shouldn't be allowed. Am I crazy? It feels, it feels like that defeats the purpose of government. Am I crazy? Am I crazy?

[Doug]

Can you imagine like a president doing his like, address and saying, well, I care about this part because I signed an NDA. I signed an NDA with Raytheon. I can't mention that, but like I tell you about the Iran war, I would tell you about it, but I

[Bernie]

signed an NDA with my financial partner, asked for one.

[Doug]

You know what it is?

[Bernie]

Yeah, this, that shit's crazy. The second one, bad experiences in the past. So she goes, she's talked to all these people in Midwest towns where some big company had promised a plant or whatever and then pulled out. Or, you know, this town used to have a big GM plant and General Motors went bankrupt or left. And then that town's just been screwed. And so there's all these instances where these towns have been like, quote, are we going to get left holding the bag? Was a phrase I heard over and over. They are worried that company comes in, promises all these things. The town has to offer things for them to pick their town. That's what's been going on for several years. They'll say, we're going to give you a bunch of tax breaks, so we're not going to get any stadiums, bro.

[Doug]

It's.

[Bernie]

Yeah, yeah, exactly. And again, the NDA thing was causing them to not be able to go to other towns and say, what are you guys being offered? And so these towns were like building out infrastructure and promising all these tax like, write offs that kind of undercut the core premise of value proposition in order to try to get these deals locked. And then some of them don't end up happening. And so there's this total lack of trust from local communities and their local government and the company to then deliver on what they're saying is gonna happen. And then all this is within the context of broader social media. Everybody's getting pissed off and organizing this on a much broader scale. But even then she said it's less about climate change broadly and it's more about this physical space in our town will become a big ugly box. So every, you know, the data center of every, every data center is gonna have a different impact, uses, has different water usage. Like the water thing is largely going away with closed loop water cooling. But the energy usages, the companies are telling them, oh, we're gonna cover all the energy. But then here we go. Quote, in Michigan, people had already been primed by Years of rate hikes. So promises that a data center's costs will be covered ring hollow. There's just no trust that these companies are gonna do the things that they're saying they're gonna do. So even when a company does come in, and I've read a few cases where like this town got $100 million in tax revenue and they're able to pay all their teachers well and blah, blah, blah, but most of the jobs are temporary. They're really well paying, but they're temporary. And then the tax things. So she actually in this thing interviewed Kathy Hochul, the governor of New York, who's being criticized as this like NIMBY developer. But Kathy Hochul sort of says no, no, no. The point is that every local government is being overwhelmed by these corporate lawyers offering these things and trying to push them to make a decision really quick and offer all this stuff. And what I'm doing is saying we are pausing this for a year until we get standards across everything that every single one. So early ideas would include statewide environmental rules. You have to do $1 million in local benefit benefits per megawatt. You have to repeal the state sales tax exemption so these tax exemptions can't go through. So I think it's a really fascinating article about small communities feeling like they've been taken advantage of and seemingly have been.

[Doug]

Yeah.

[Bernie]

And that's being a lot of like on the ground pushback rather than just what you see on social media.

[Doug]

That's fascinating. I mean, I like what you said about temporary jobs because I was looking into this and it's. They are extraordinarily well paying and the economy is bad right now and there's people, people in my community who do like H Vac that you just travel the country going to these different data center sites and they're making bank.

[Guest Expert]

Yeah.

[Doug]

But they're not putting down roots in the town and it's on to the next one. Once you build anything. So this, this weird. And then once they're running, my understanding is they require a lot less employment.

[Bernie]

Yeah, it's like I forget off the top of my head, it's like a hundredth or something. It's like a small number of maintenance staff, but the job creation is a temporary. All these temporary hotels and, you know, services spring up in this town and then they just go away after two or three years.

[Aiden]

That was my surprise, is that people are so quick to leap at this because if, if you're presented something like, oh, here is Amazon's coming in and creating Like a big fulfillment center and warehouse or there's gonna be this large like factory. I feel like there's something more clearly concrete about the employment that those things are offering. You know, people could have their own like qualms with like those things being set up in your town as well.

[Guest Expert]

Yeah.

[Aiden]

But ultimately it's like, oh, when this thing is finished and operating, it's a place filled with employees. That's the mental image you have in your head when you think about it.

[Doug]

Right.

[Aiden]

But my mental image of a data center that's fully operational is like empty rows of servers that are overseen by like a couple guys.

[Doug]

Yeah.

[Aiden]

And it's interesting to me that all of these towns are like leaping at an opportunity that has that long term vision for it. Like I sure they know that the benefit is short term or I feel like they would.

[Bernie]

The article talks about it as well, but you know, so it's worth, it's worth acknowledging what can be good here. A lot of these are like Midwest towns that were hollowed out over the past couple decades. They don't have anything. One of the examples she talks about is this giant like basically where they used to be, this massive construction. It's just this giant wasted plot where nothing is happening and would cost tens of millions of dollars to retrofit into anything useful. And a data center could come in, they could do that, generate the temporary jobs. But then as long as there is tax revenue locked in and the companies aren't taking advantage of these little towns to get massive tax benefits, then it's like, okay, if a town democratically decides to allow this to happen and you have Microsoft come in and build a big data center, you tax them, you tax the shit out of them. You should get a bunch of sales tax and property taxes from this. And then a small town that otherwise is hollowing out and has nothing at least has this just huge surge of tax base in response. You have a big ugly box, ideally in a place where most people aren't living right next to it. So it's not perfect, but there is a world where this is helpful to communities that want just. Of course you can't have these kind of tactics. This is so ridiculous.

[Doug]

I totally agree. If they could tax it, there's a, there's way more benefit. Because at on some level it's like these companies are the richest companies in America. They have hundreds of billions of dollars they're throwing into this. You could siphon that off to small. Like you could actually turn that money into your money. There's a benefit there. But yeah, if they're, if they're just out legal maneuvering that.

[Aiden]

It reminds me, I mean it's exploiting the small communities. It's a, you're, you're backing them into a corner, taking away any of like the real long term tangible benefits they could be getting out of this and making sure they can't communicate with anybody else so that they can't figure out what those benefits could be and then plopping down all the consequences on them.

[Bernie]

It's usually deferred, I should say. It's not like, oh, I'm not going to pay you taxes. It's like the first 10 years I won't have to pay taxes. But then of course, as is talked about in this article, people are like, none of these companies are profitable right now. What if you go out of business in 10 years? There's nothing stopping the company from then leaving after eight years. And they never got to the point they had to pay taxes. So as long as there's an. As long as the local governments are at the negotiating table and don't get taken advantage of, they can get the tax revenue immediately. It's like, what should happen.

[Doug]

Yeah. Before I stopped uploading, I had been working on a big clip while back about the stadium move in. I think it's the Chiefs, right? I mean, I'm not, I'm out of, I'm out of. But I think the.

[Aiden]

You haven't uploaded a video in so long, you can't.

[Doug]

This is a video from December I didn't upload. I'm going back on it. The Chiefs were moving their stadium and they moved it literally like one town over very small distance. And a lot of people online were like, what an idiot. The stupid city wouldn't give them enough to be happy there. They wouldn't let them upgrade their thing and that's why they moved and they lost a great franchise. Like all NFL fans were thinking it was stupid. But if you look at the details, the, the, the company, I mean, yeah, the stadium, the team like rushed through with lawyers, offered some short term bonuses. They pressured the most cities to compete with each other and they got the other city, the other Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri. It's like right across the border to offer them like complete tax immunity on like every, every aspect. Like all of the money from the stadium goes to them profitably and they don't have to pay any taxes on anything it makes. From outside of that, I don't really think I get the exact details. The point is they completely shuffle the system and they made it so the tax base for the area cuts out everything near the stadium and all the wealthy neighborhoods or something so they don't have to pay into anything. And only thing that pays into the construction fee is like, like the poor neighborhoods on the outskirts I guess.

[Aiden]

Would the city make the argument that there will be enough like economic activity would build.

[Doug]

And obviously a stadium has more economic activity than a data center. But what they found was or at least unbiased estimates looked into it and it's like no, some people show up for games but there's only like 12 major games in NFL stadium a year. Like they don't do that many and the, the cost vastly, vastly dwarfs it. So what they did was they like fuck up their tax base and, and yeah, so yeah, it just is an example of like a well connected, well legally equipped corporation essentially using their information advantage to like get a law passed or something to get something to their benefit in the long term. It doesn't, doesn't help the local town.

[Bernie]

Same thing in Chicago I believe. Exact details. But parking with the stadium. Oh, they're, they're trying to build a new stadium and they're considering moving it out of, I mean right now it's like right on water, I believe in Chicago. And then they're trying to get a new field built and most likely it's going to get pushed way out of the city because they're just being offered all these property tax works things. Just. It's ridiculous.

[Doug]

Yeah, you would think that the two

[Bernie]

cities team up and they're like hey, why don't we just both agree that we want taxes from this? And it's just. I man, yeah, when I was looking

[Doug]

into it again, it's all not fresh but there's a huge incentive on the politicians part to be at a ribbon cutting ceremony getting something built or released. You feel like you've made a tangible accomplishment instead of like just writing something down or making small tweaks. And also you're not going to be there for the consequences that have like the reduced tax base down the road so you get to have the big short term bonus and the, it's like a political mismatch on incentives is what the stadiums thing really is boiled down to. And I'm sure it's similar here.

[Aiden]

Yeah, it's weird because I don't really know what the solution is. I almost feel like you need something at a state level. But in the Kansas City example like the cities aren't, the cities aren't in the same state.

[Guest Expert]

Right.

[Aiden]

It's the split.

[Doug]

Yeah, it's right on the border.

[Bernie]

Same thing with Chicago. It'd be moving it to Indiana. Right. Or Illinois. Sorry, I'm not good at Midwest. But, like, it's gonna move to a different state, which is crazy for, like, one of the most historic sports franchises.

[Aiden]

It's still gonna be called the Chicago Bears.

[Guest Expert]

Yeah.

[Aiden]

That's crazy. That's crazy. Yeah. But you would need some sort of oversight that like, requires, like, cities to, like, not negotiate against each other on some line or basis that there always need to be. It needs to be like a minimum requirement for.

[Doug]

Yeah. I mean, just the idea of governments playing different aspects. I'm sorry, Corporations playing different aspects of our government against each other to get the best deals is poor in the long term. It feels. It feels like that.

[Bernie]

If you were a billionaire, would you. Would you though? If you were like, okay, I'm gonna bill. I have $20 billion. I own this sports franchise. We're making a new stadium somewhere, and I can save $2 billion because Indiana instead of Illinois is offering me tax breaks.

[Doug]

Yeah. No, it's like everyone's going off incentives.

[Bernie]

Right.

[Doug]

They're gonna do the same thing. I could tell you that. I wouldn't, but if I was a billionaire old stadium owner, they're like, if

[Bernie]

you're a billionaire, you have a lifetime of decisions that led you to get

[Doug]

to that is very similar to that.

[Bernie]

Which point you'll be like, I will take the two, $3 billion.

[Aiden]

Well, I mean, on the front of not facing consequences when it comes to taxes. I have a little update for you guys.

[Doug]

Oh, yeah. They finally got you. Do you?

[Aiden]

Well, they're coming for me, for one. Didn't want to say that on the show. You can do a big clip on that.

[Doug]

On you.

[Aiden]

My tax audit.

[Doug]

That'd be pretty desperate for upload at that point. The Aiden doesn't pay his debt.

[Aiden]

You can't tell me that clip wouldn't pop if I actually got audited.

[Doug]

Oh, maybe if I could really deep dive into your finances in jail with you, that'd be a banger.

[Aiden]

You do like a Caleb Hammer episode with me. We just.

[Doug]

When I'm really desperate, I'll come back to you.

[Sponsor Voice 2]

We'll do that.

[Doug]

Okay.

[Aiden]

Okay.

[Doug]

All right.

[Aiden]

So you guys might remember from a while ago, there was this whole anti weaponization fund that Trump and Todd Blanch were pushing for. The idea being that in as a trade off to the scrutiny that Trump had faced from the IRS a while back. He Wanted an anti weaponization fund put in place that set aside $1.8 billion that allowed victims of the government, for example, the January Six protesters, to be paid out from this fund that Trump's select group of lawyers, or rather Todd Blanche's select group of lawyers could make payouts from. But the other stipulation, and this got canned. This did not go through.

[Doug]

They stopped it. Reddit.

[Bernie]

But you write so funny that what you just described would be like, talked about for eight straight years. With Obama, it's like it was just like one week and then everybody moves on to the next Iran war.

[Doug]

And even that's like everyone's got over it. Like, nothing sticks anymore. I don't know if it's a Trump thing or if, like we've all just gotten short form video, but it feels like no story really has the sauce for more than one week.

[Aiden]

It's a little bit of both.

[Doug]

It's crazy.

[Aiden]

Well, the thing, the funny thing about that is you. Do you guys remember what the other little nugget or stipulation alongside that was?

[Doug]

He can't be investigated for tax crimes.

[Aiden]

Exactly. He has indefinite IRS immunity as well as his family and their affiliated companies.

[Doug]

Love that.

[Aiden]

And that was the other part of this agreement.

[Doug]

Tell me if you weren't a billionaire, you wouldn't run for president, win the presidency.

[Bernie]

A series of decisions leading up to having total immunity from the irs.

[Aiden]

And if I was it, and if I was a billionaire and I made all those decisions, I was smart enough to become one. Yes, I probably would go for it. Probably, I would probably go for it.

[Doug]

Can't, can't fault him.

[Aiden]

So he did. They, they dropped the anti weaponization fund and that fell out of the news cycle. But what didn't get dropped was this idea of indefinite IRS immunity for Trump. And why this matters. Like, Trump has already encountered problems with the IRS where he had previously was going to owe up to $100 million in owed taxes or fees to the IRS as an example of an audit that he had already experienced. So this is ignoring everything else we know about Trump. This is not a man with a clean audit history.

[Doug]

Well,

[Aiden]

and Trump, you know, pushes, pushing back against this is that he's been unfairly targeted and audited more than other rich people. I've been audited every year of my entire life, which I have a lot of wealthy friends that were never audited to this day. They were never audited. I was audited. Mr. Trump said that. And you know, he added, he tacked on, I've been Treated very unfairly. But it was asked. The interesting thing about this stipulation is that it applies to his kids and their affiliated companies. And it was asked directly of the companies. Senator Warren asked companies like Kalshee Polymarket, American Bitcoin whether or not they considered themselves immune to tax investigations or prosecutions because of their affiliations to the Trump family. And those three companies that I just said did say that. No, they don't consider themselves immune like our.

[Doug]

It would be fudgeing insane to say that Donald Trump Jr. Is like our advisor on our board, therefore we cannot be investigated for tax taxes. It would be as Couchy. That would be fucking crazy, I guess.

[Bernie]

Trust me, bro, for the entire history of the company, it would be insane.

[Aiden]

It would be insane of them to say that.

[Doug]

However, that's a story for two weeks from now.

[Aiden]

Other, other companies like World Liberty Financial, which if you aren't familiar with this is like the crypto company that $2

[Doug]

billion from the Saudis. Right, yeah.

[Aiden]

That we've talked about on this show before that the Trump, the Trump sons own as well as a few other parties. They just declined to answer that question of whether or not their company would be immune with this stipulation in place. And Blanche has also pushed back and said that there are limits to the protections that I am implying here but is not really elaborating on the specifics of how they would, would or would not be applied. And this, this is pretty much the beginning and end of this for now. It's just a follow up to something that I think is absolutely insane. The idea that the President can get some sort of tax immunity because he's managed to appoint somebody like Blanche into a position of power, his own previously personal lawyer and also include his family in that. Yeah, it's fucking insane. Yeah.

[Doug]

I don't know why he doesn't just pay the taxes. Because the truth Social hundred thousand dol monthly fee rolled out. It just happened and people are paying it.

[Bernie]

This is the exact same question again. I'm like if I was, if I was. If I just made like $4 billion off corruption, I'd just pay the 100 million. But that's not what got the billionaire to that point.

[Doug]

That's the deal.

[Bernie]

He needs the fucking IRS immunity.

[Aiden]

I would never be in that spot. I don't think like that too much of a cuck.

[Doug]

We're little cucks who pay our taxes on the subject. Because there's also a finance story I read a really good piece that basically made the argument this is A financial substack. He was like, listen, for the longest time, markets were an extremely competitive place in finance where they'd hire the best and the brightest and the quants, and they would make these algorithms and they would think about these ideas and they would have these long short funds and hedge funds. They would all find ways to compete with each other to get an edge, to make alpha extra money. And he said, it's gotten so brutally competitive at these top Wall street firms over, like, finding an edge in the market that they're all basically, like, struggling to get an extra 1 percentage over each other. Like, they all, they'll have the same ideas, the same investment ideas. They're all just basically putting in an AI. And so he's like, when you reach that point, if you want to grow revenue or returns a percent or two every year, the way you do that is you start cutting into tax. Like, like you just pay less taxes. So instead, all the innovation, the brilliant minds and the people they're hiring are putting their attention more towards finding ever increasingly impressive ways to get around taxes, because that is a way for your clients to make them an extra 1% over your competition. And so the article went into detail on, like we talked about the more common ways. Maybe I'll do a follow up on this next week. He went into detail on, like, they are getting so advanced and finding so many. I was one example. I remember. So, you know, like, if you have a, if you have a stock and you sell it at a loss, it's a. You can deduct on your taxes.

[Aiden]

Yeah.

[Doug]

Like, if I invest in Microsoft, it goes down, I sell it, I can deduct that. And they would do these long short funds where they would have, you know, you bet certain things, you bet against certain things. Some things will lose money. Something's mainly made money. When you package all this into an etf, you only counts as a sale for you when you sell the whole thing. Okay? So it's holding a lot of stocks are changing all the time. Like if you hold an S&P 500, it's changing all the time. So what they're doing now is they're taking all their trade ideas, putting into a DF that you buy, okay. And you're not selling the ETF for a long time. But within the etf, they are structurally putting in losers. They're putting in guaranteed losses that are deducting against and selling the losses more frequently.

[Aiden]

Right.

[Doug]

They're holding the long and then constantly selling the longs, the shorts to counterbalance it, it's like this insane financial engineering and, and it's all legal within our current system and it was kind of hard to do before because of algorithms. They could do it really fast now. So. Yeah, it's just this weird thing where you're constantly including guaranteed losses into your overall package that you don't individually have to sell, but they can sell it to deduct against the overall return of the fund. It's crazy. It's, it's wild. I'll have to do a deeper dive because I didn't fully. I just read this thing, but it just made me think of how obvious it is that, yeah, of course they would start cutting into the taxis because that is their, that's the last area. It's like when the, it's like with Game of Thrones when they have the rat and they're eating it up. There's only one where you can go, dude, they're just going through the tax base. And it reminds me of these ever increasing ways they're finding around data centers and stadiums. And we need one nice story to end on because this is actually a pretty bleak episode. It was a good episode. I really enjoyed it. These are all good stories.

[Bernie]

Chinese cars playing or we could do Meta sued. That's.

[Doug]

I guess I have a win.

[Bernie]

It's, it's, it's a depressing story that ends with punishment, I guess. Do we want to end on like good thing happened or bad thing happened and they're punished? What feels better?

[Doug]

Oh, I think people want consequences. Yeah. I'd love to hear about the punishment of Meta if you have a, I

[Bernie]

mean the real quick version. Meta famously made Facebook and so that's that. And I've been reading article about that. So actually in March I talked about how they were ordered to pay $375 million in penalties because they in New Mexico were determined to have violated the Unfair Practices act by misleading the public about safety for young users. But actually that was a two part trial which I didn't know about. And then part two just ended this week. And the second part was a different legal question which is like, is the platform a public nuisance to teen health? And so the judge ordered that, yes, it is and ordered a $567 million fine for harming teens health. So the total from that case is $942 million. That meta is, that is paying just in New Mexico for harming young people's mental health. And they're being ordered to change how they operate. They are supposed to remove like, counts now, which.

[Doug]

Wait, what?

[Bernie]

Yeah, so the judge is saying, like, in order for this to not be a public health habit, how do I

[Doug]

know how many likes I get?

[Bernie]

I know. And what's even worse for underage users, they won't be able to look at their metrics to see how well their posts are doing. No push notifications from 10:00pm to 7:00am Wait, they're.

[Doug]

Dude, we are inventing the Daily scroll from first principles. We are going to get there eventually. You guys think it's stupid, but every year we get closer to it.

[Aiden]

I'm not even kidding.

[Doug]

They're putting time gaps on certain notifications. That's so Daily scroll coded.

[Aiden]

We're getting. We're getting closer and closer to the Daily Scroll. You have to admit it. The Daily scroll is coming.

[Doug]

It's coming.

[Bernie]

And then, unfortunately, they did a cap of, for young people, 90 hours a month, which equivocates to about three, three hours a day. And unfortunately, Brandon, they did not say that those three hours have to happen at a certain time slot called the Daily Scroll.

[Doug]

They will, they will.

[Aiden]

It'll take a few more years.

[Doug]

The world's not ready for it when I proposed it, but I'm ahead of my time.

[Bernie]

So it's a dude. That's almost a billion dollars just in New Mexico and two other cases, one of which I mentioned, which is that in March, a woman in Los Angeles sued all these social media companies. Meta lost and had to pay her $3 million. Not a lot of money for Meta, but when that's a single individual winning that against Meta. Yeah, that can scale. Really, really could win the same really fast. And also in 20, 23, 33 different states sued Meta for harming young people's mental health. That's been combined into one giant federal case that's starting to be held and go to trial now. So they're doing what's called bellwether trials, I believe is the term. And that's where you. You basically, if there's a whole bunch of things that need to be trialed, you take a couple of them to kind of like test the water. Let's see how it goes. So they're starting right now. This is like.

[Aiden]

There's.

[Bernie]

There's like 40 states that are suing Meta in some form for this. The trial's being held in Oakland with the goat judge, Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.

[Doug]

Yeah.

[Bernie]

She back the same judge who did Apple versus Epic, the same judge who did Elon Musk versus Sam Altman in OpenAI. And now she's Doing like the nationwide mega social media.

[Doug]

She's hitting the big ones of the decade.

[Bernie]

Yeah. And she seems like really good. So that's sick. So metal is getting like crazy fucked.

[Doug]

9th Circuit Court there is the, there's the thing that all these companies use which is section 230, which I don't know if I know the exact details of. It's but that's how they evade responsibility for things uploaded on their platform. And the ninth District Court, just the

[Bernie]

idea is like, like it's user generated content. So we're not, we're not like overseeing, we're not editorializing it, we aren't the ones writing this content. Therefore like we don't have total responsibility for the actual content.

[Doug]

Right.

[Bernie]

That's the argument.

[Doug]

The court threw that argument out or at least said that you cannot use it to dismiss lawsuits out of hand. You can use it as an argument within the lawsuit, but you have to engage with these. So that was the big shift. It is not a defense to liability. It doesn't, doesn't provide immunity from being sued as they were trying to argue. You're not immune from me sued because

[Aiden]

I mean that's kind of a step in the direction of stricter punishments or enforcement on the government's part, making them moderate the platforms better.

[Sponsor Voice]

Right.

[Aiden]

And banning people more effectively.

[Doug]

If you're getting billion dollar fines regularly, you better fucking.

[Aiden]

We gave the example of how in China, like a lot of the censorship that is experienced there is not necessarily happening through the government itself. The government just imposes such steep consequences on the companies that they do most of the policing themselves. And yeah, the fact that this is like the first, I think one of the first big cases playing out with this level of consequence in the single state and this is all following suit, it feels like a step in the right direction. At least I do think the, the wishy washy part to me was the things like, oh, we're getting rid of the push notifications at these times, we're capping the hours because those are all the things that it's like kids just get around. And I'm not really sure how effective any of those things will be in the aggregate. Maybe I'm wrong about that. I feel like that part of it still needs to be more substantial, but by sticking it to the company, hopefully they start spending more time thinking about the changes they need to make to prevent these things from happening.

[Doug]

Yeah, they're calling it the highest profile corporate trial since the tobacco settlement. Like the big where all the states do tobacco companies and this is. Yeah, you said 29 states in a week versus meta. That's kind of crazy. It's going to be a. Yeah, we'll

[Bernie]

follow up on this, we'll talk about it. Presumably, like many of these things, it will take a long time. And, you know, even with the removing likes, it's not clear, first off, Meta's going to appeal it. And then we don't know whether will that be applied across everywhere or just New Mexico. But I. It's getting to a point of like, can Meta exist as a company?

[Doug]

Like, they had so much bad news recently, it's crazy.

[Aiden]

Well, they got llama.

[Doug]

That's the other thing is like, if they were crushing it, AI be like, well, you can't stop them because they're, they're going crazy, but they're also losing.

[Bernie]

It feels like the big tech companies, they're the only ones that. I can really think it's just social media.

[Guest Expert]

Right.

[Bernie]

But if social media now becomes, oh, any person under 18 can sue you for millions of dollars. Anyone? Like, how do you survive as a business? I don't. I don't know.

[Doug]

There are.

[Bernie]

This is a crazy thing.

[Doug]

Well, they have the metaverse, so they

[Bernie]

do have the metaverse.

[Doug]

Let's not rule out the legless metaverse.

[Bernie]

So TikTok is also being sued by tons of young people. This is a Reuters article. And they're settling privately. Like, TikTok is not allowing these to go to trial. So, like Snap and TikTok are also dealing with this right now, and they're just trying to, like, stuff it under the rug by settling rather than doing what Meta is doing. There are right now in Los Angeles alone, 3,300 lawsuits against social media companies for harming young people's mental health. If every one of those is worth $7 million, and that's just in Los

[Aiden]

Angeles, dude, they're gonna be like the billboards for car accidents. Have you been armed by social media?

[Bernie]

Did you feel bad about yourself when you were under 18?

[Doug]

If you're under 18 and you want to make some money, sue TikTok right now. They'll probably pay you to just shut it up. But not even kidding.

[Aiden]

Not financial advice.

[Doug]

No. I'm guaranteeing this lawsuit will be profitable for you. Well, look, that's crazy that. Wait, I have one. It's like a three second story. Okay, I'll end on a story because this is a good one. It made me think of it when you're talking about Japan earlier.

[Aiden]

Okay.

[Doug]

You said in these Japanese towns they can't control all the bears. There's so many bears. There's a surgeon bears, There's a surgeon bears. Well, there's a Chinese town where they don't have enough bears, but they're kind of known for their bears. So they came up with a solution. They're going to pay people $15,000 to wear a bear costume and be totally silent.

[Bernie]

Is ridiculous. They could solve their problem easily by importing foreign bears and their xenophobia.

[Doug]

Yeah, there's xenophobia for Japanese bears.

[Aiden]

They do have crazy Japan and China. We didn't talk about that a lot

[Doug]

while we were there. Yeah, we should talk about this more. And by the way, this is an available job, even for foreigners, I think. So if you want to make some money, you can go to China. You can be a bear. You have to wear the costume. You're not allowed to speak Chinese. You can't scroll social media.

[Aiden]

Oh, sorry, I shouldn't have said anything.

[Doug]

And they want you to be playful with it. So you have to kind of like be fun but still act like a bear. You have to act like a bear. Okay, so I will end on that note. A little fun. Economy news. Easy way to make money in this. There's always a way to find ways.

[Aiden]

Okay, this was a tough episode. I'm doing the mental recap of the stories. If you want more heartwarming, heartwarming content, you go to the patreon patreon.com lemonade stand where we do an extra hour of the show every week. We also do a book club. We just did our book club episode on Disney War.

[Doug]

It was great. Yeah.

[Aiden]

We will see you guys next week.

[Doug]

Thanks for watching. See you. Bye.

[Aiden]

Hi, Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Are you looking for a beach read this summer? May I suggest your big wireless bill? It's got suspense, mystery, a slightly flat

[Doug]

emotional arc, and a shocking twist where you realize you've been overpaying the entire time.

[Aiden]

Fortunately, though, Mint Story is better. Every plan, $15 a month, even unlimited.

[Bernie]

That's it.

[Doug]

Happy ending, zero tears. Give it a [e-mail] Switch upfront payment

[Sponsor Voice 2]

of $45 for three months, $90 for six months or $180 for a 12 month plan. Required $15 per month. Equivalent taxes and fees. Extra initial plan term only greater than 50gb. Me slow when network is busy. See terms.