Loading summary
A
July 17, 2026 Yesterday, President Donald J. Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller all threw the weight of the US Government behind a far right conspiracy theory that says Trump and his loyalists are defending the United States of America against a communist takeover. As Gil Duran of the Nerd Reich recalled today. Two years ago, far right influencer Jack Posobiek and co author Joshua Lisak wrote a best selling book called the Secret History of Communist Revolutions and How to Crush Them. Trump ally and media guru Stephen Bannon wrote the introduction. Donald Trump Jr. Blurbed the book, saying that it provided a playbook to deploy immediately to save the west. Then Ohio Senator J.D. vance also blurbed the book, saying, in the past, Communists marched in the streets waving red flags. Today they march through human resources, college campuses and courtrooms to wage lawfare against good, honest people. In Unhumans, Jack Posobiek and Joshua Lisik reveal their plans and show us what to do to fight back. Posobiec is a loyalist who worked to keep Trump in office after voters elected Democrat Joe Biden in 2020. He's known for courting controversy by promoting what Maya Oppenheim of The Independent in 2018 called holy, erroneous and debunked conspiracy theories, including the infamous 2016 Pizzagate conspiracy theory. The Democrats were operating a child sex ring in the basement of a Washington, D.C. pizza restaurant. In Unhuman, Spisobiek and Lisak argue that the United States is under siege by the left, which in their view means anyone from Communists to progressives. For the purposes of this book, we will call them the Unhumans, the authors write, because they oppose everything that makes up humanity as they are opposed to humanity itself. They place themselves outside of the category completely in an entirely new misery driven subdivision. The Unhuman. Lisak explained to Nathan J. Robinson of Current affairs that the reason they called the book Unhumans is because it's a verb to unhuman someone. To unhuman someone means to deprive someone of their rights to life, liberty and property. The authors insisted that Communists were trying to unhuman those they consider good Americans and that we can't tolerate an ideology like that and so must do it to them. First, ignoring the fascist revolutions that gave rise to World War II, the authors tied together left wing revolutions from the late Roman Republic to the French Revolution of 1789 to the Russian and Chinese revolutions to the present, and claim that all political positions designed to regulate business provide a basic social safety net, promote Infrastructure or protect civil rights reflect that same left wing radicalism. In their telling Spain's fascist dictator, Francisco Franco, who said, wherever I am, there will be no communism is a hero. Franco ordered illegal detentions, to torture and mass killings in the name of social cleansing. As Michelle Goldberg of the New York Times noted in 2024, the right wing has often championed Franco, but it's extremely unusual for a candidate for Vice President of the United States to openly align himself with autocratic terror. The embrace of authoritarianism in unhumans reflects the modern version of an ideology shaped after World War II by those determined to get rid of the modern state. Although the great majority of both Republicans and Democrats embraced such a government, right wing reactionaries insisted it was a slippery slope to socialism. Defending business regulation, social welfare, infrastructure investment and civil rights cost tax dollars, and so they said, redistributed wealth. Over the years, reactionaries insisted that Americans who believed in such a system were un American takers, sucking dry the country's makers. Increasingly, they demonized black Americans or people of color and women as lazy and looking for government handouts, breaking laws with impunity, corrupting the country with their godless ways, and winning elections only by cheating. And yet voters continued to elect lawmakers who supported the modern government. This infuriated the far right, but even establishment Republicans recognized that voters liked Social Security and cancer research, clean air and reproductive rights. While they turned out voters by railing against the liberals who supported regulations on the welfare state, they made sure not to cut into those programs deeply enough to cause a backlash. Trump has unmasked that facade. He has put the far right in power where they are destroying the modern American state. Right wing officials have undermined the world trade system that underpins American prosperity, empowered economic monopolists by slashing regulations and public lands, decimated reproductive rights and health care, cut social safety programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Medicaid, slashed medical and scientific research, and dismantled the post World War II rules based international order that has maintained global stability for 75 years. But the right wing push to get rid of the modern state is deeply unpopular. And so Trump and his loyalists are embracing the idea that his opponents are in league with a historic through line of left wing revolutionaries. Trump's speech last night began with a completely fantastical vision of current conditions in the US that has been widely debunked point by point by fact checkers. But his portrait of a nation doing really well was a setup for his warning that the prosperity and success he touts are under direct threat by leftists both abroad and at home. Trump claimed to present evidence that Beginning with the 2020 election cycle, China carried out what was believed to be the largest compromise of election data in history. He referred to China's illicit acquisition of 220 million US voter files and called this an unprecedented election security nightmare. In fact, as Louis Jacobson and Amy Sherman of PolitiFact Report, documents the White House itself posted show that such information is publicly available for purchase, and such purchases are common. Trump also said documents showed that members of the Deep State State worked to actively suppress and downplay information about the extent of China's sinister election meddling. But in fact, the intelligence community told Trump about foreign interference in 2021, and Biden released its report when he took office. The report said China did not make an effort to change the outcome of the 2020 election. Actually, one of the documents Trump released yesterday shows that Russia tried to influence the 2020 election to defeat Biden. Its operatives worked with U.S. officials and other prominent persons to spread claims about former President Biden as well as Ukrainian politicians and alleged Ukrainian influence in the 2016 US elections. Trump has denied Russian interference in US elections. Trump tied American journalists to this alleged plot, claiming the Chinese government was paying journalists to write negatively about him. He then attacked the media for being part of a plot to continue this election fraud. For whatever reason, they want to keep it going. They want to protect the radical left. He called for the government to revoke their broadcast licenses. The findings are stunning, Trump said, and indeed, if they were true, we should expect dramatic diplomatic rifts and lawsuits. But does Trump actually believe any of this? The White House today said plans for a lavish state visit of Chinese leader Xi jinping to Washington, D.C. in two months have not changed. Trump's warning of a communist threat against US Elections was a setup for his insistence that future elections could be rigged and that the country must do as he says to stop that danger. He said he had ordered the Department of Homeland Security to notify every state about non citizens on their roles and direct them to be deemed ineligible. And he demanded Congress pass the Save America Voter Suppression act, saying the only reason you wouldn't do it is you want to cheat because your policies are so bad and your candidates are so pathetic that you can't get elected in any other way. These reforms are urgently needed to stop the vulnerabilities that I have mentioned, he said. And he told Americans to call lawmakers to demand they pass the Save America Act. Today, Secretary of Homeland Security Mark Wayne Mullen demanded states run voter rolls through a federal digital tool designed to identify non citizens who are ineligible for certain government programs. Federal judges have blocked federal demands for those roles 16 times and prohibited the use of the federal tool, noting it was not designed to scan citizens information and often flags recently naturalized citizens as non citizens blocked by the courts. Mullen threatens state officials with criminal prosecution if they don't comply with Trump's demands. Yesterday, Secretary of State Rubio expounded on the administration's opposition to radical left terrorism. A meeting at the State Department was billed as an examination of the transnational nature of far left terrorism terrorism. But Shannon K. Kingston of ABC News noted that Rubio and other officials from the Trump administration spoke primarily about what they call antifa and conditions in the United States, including the assassination attempts against Trump. Kingston noted that a 2025 analysis by the center for Strategic and International Studies, or csis, shows that left wing political violence in the US Remains much lower than historical levels of violence carried out by right wing and jihadist attackers. Nonetheless, the White House said under the leadership of President Donald J. Trump, far left extremism will be treated with the same seriousness and ferocity the world has long reserved for jihadist terrorism. There is a point to all this. Bannon argued in Tuesday's War Room podcast that the idea of communists threatening to take over the United States through corrupt elections is a predicate for immediate action. That immediate action, he said, would be for Trump to declare a National Security Emergency executive order that took all of Save America. Plus plus plus plus and then we can be sure the Republicans will win the 2026 elections and as Trump keeps saying, all the elections for the next 100 years. They would do so by default as the administration purged so called communists from public life. The parallels between unhumans and the administration's current rhetoric showed yesterday in Miller's speech at the State Department. Bannon's introduction to Unhumans begins with an epigram that reads Communism is when ugly, deformed freaks make it illegal to be normal, then rob and or kill all successful people out of petty resentment and cruelty. The ideology is all just window dressing, miller told the State Department attendees. It's not a coincidence that when you look at these violent antifa demonstrations, you see any photograph of those who are assembled. To be blunt, not one of the people that is demonstrating looks like a normal person. Not one looks normal. They're all deformed in some way. In their appearance, in their dress, in their mannerism. Why is that? You look at two photographs and you see, you know, a normal American street, you see an antifa protest. Why did the people that are violently demonstrating, why is there not one normal looking person among them? Every one of them, through the course of their life and their decisions, has scarred their body and their appearance in many different ways, to the point in which their outer appearance becomes a manifestation of their inner hatred. In response to Trump's address last night, the chair of the Democratic association of Secretaries of State, Cisco Aguilar of Nevada, released a statement saying, that was some bull.
B
Letters From An American was written and read by Heather Cox Richardson. It was produced at Soundscape Productions, Dedham, MA. Recorded with music composed by Michael Moss.
Host: Heather Cox Richardson
Date: July 19, 2026
Episode Overview:
In this episode, Heather Cox Richardson dissects the latest push by President Donald Trump and his administration to propagate a far-right conspiracy theory alleging an imminent communist takeover of America. Drawing on recent speeches, policy actions, and the intellectual underpinnings of today's far-right rhetoric, Richardson highlights the deep historical roots, political dynamics, and public opposition to these moves. She critically examines the administration’s claims, their factual accuracy, and the broader implications for American democracy.
J.D. Vance’s Blurb of Unhumans ([01:05]):
"In the past, Communists marched in the streets waving red flags. Today they march through human resources, college campuses and courtrooms to wage lawfare against good, honest people."
Jack Posobiec & Joshua Lisak on "unhuman" ([02:17]):
"To unhuman someone means to deprive someone of their rights to life, liberty and property... we can’t tolerate an ideology like that and so must do it to them."
Richardson on right-wing grievance ([04:50]):
"While they turned out voters by railing against the liberals who supported regulations on the welfare state, they made sure not to cut into those programs deeply enough to cause a backlash. Trump has unmasked that facade. He has put the far right in power where they are destroying the modern American state."
On Trump's Election Claims ([06:32]):
“Trump’s speech last night began with a completely fantastical vision of current conditions in the US that has been widely debunked point by point by fact checkers.”
Stephen Miller on protesters ([13:47]):
“Not one of the people that is demonstrating looks like a normal person. Not one looks normal. They’re all deformed in some way... Every one of them, through the course of their life and their decisions, has scarred their body and their appearance in many different ways, to the point in which their outer appearance becomes a manifestation of their inner hatred.”
Response from Cisco Aguilar, Democratic Association of Secretaries of State ([15:16]):
“That was some bull.”
Richardson’s narration is factual, analytical, and urgent. She brings a strong historical perspective, highlighting not just the current rhetoric but its deep roots and dangers. The episode’s tone is both sober and sharply critical, especially regarding the administration’s overt embrace of conspiracy theory, authoritarian rhetoric, and anti-democratic policies.
Useful for listeners wanting a deep understanding of how history and extremism intersect with current events and the ongoing struggle over American democracy.