Loading summary
A
Foreign 2025 in his final address to the nation last night, President Joe Biden issued a warning that an oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms, and a fair shot for everyone to get ahead. It's not exactly news that there is dramatic economic inequality in the United States. Economists call the period from 1933 to 1981 the Great Compression, for it marked a time when business regulation, progressive taxation, strong unions, and a basic social safety net compressed both wealth and income levels in the United States. Every income group in the US improved its economic standing. That period ended in 1981, when the US entered a period economists have dubbed the great divergence. Between 1981 and 2021, deregulation, tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations, the offshore of manufacturing, and the weakening of unions moved $50 trillion from the bottom 90% of Americans to the top 1%. Biden tried to address this growing inequality by bringing back manufacturing, fostering competition, increasing oversight of business, and shoring up the safety net by getting Congress to pass a law, the Inflation Reduction act, that enabled Medicare to negotiate drug prices for seniors. With the pharmaceutical industry capping insulin at $35 for seniors, for example, his policies worked primarily by creating full employment, which enabled those at the bottom of the economy to move to higher paying jobs. During Biden's term, the gap between the 90th income percentile and the 10th income percentile fell by 25%. But Donald Trump convinced voters hurt by the inflation that stalked the country after the coronavirus pandemic shutdown that he would bring prices down and protect ordinary Americans from the Democratic elite that he said didn't care about them. Then he as soon as he was elected, he turned for advice and support to one of the richest men in the world, Elon Musk, who had invested more than $250 million in Trump's campaign. Musk's investment has paid off. Faiz Siddiqui and Trisha Thadani of the Washington Post reported that he made more than $170 billion in the weeks between the election and December 15th. Musk promptly became the face of the incoming administration, appearing everywhere with Trump, who put him and pharmaceutical engineer Vivek Ramaswamy in charge of the so called Department of Government Efficiency, where Musk vowed to cut $2 trillion out of the US budget even if it inflicted hardship on the American people. News broke earlier this week that Musk, who holds government contracts worth billions of dollars, is expected to have an office in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, adjacent to the White House. And the world's Two other richest men will be with Musk on the dais at Trump's inauguration. Musk, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and Meta Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg, who together are worth almost a trillion dollars, will be joined by other tech moguls, including The CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman, the CEO of the social media platform TikTok, Xu Zi Chu, and the CEO of Google, Sundar Pichai. At his confirmation hearing before the Senate Committee on Finance today, Trump's nominee for treasury secretary, billionaire Scott Besant, said that extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts was the single most important economic issue of the day. But he said he did not support raising the federal minimum wage, which has been $7.25 since 2009. Although 30 states and dozens of cities have raised the minimum wage in their jurisdictions, there have been signs lately that the American people are unhappy about the increasing inequality in the US on December 4, 2024, a young man shot the chief executive officer of the health insurance company United Health Care, which has been sued for turning its claims departments over to an artificial intelligence program with an error rate of 90% and which a Federal Trade Commission report earlier this week found overcharged cancer patients by more than 1000% for life saving drugs. Americans championed the Alleged Killer it is a truism in American history that those interested in garnering wealth and power use culture wars to obscure class struggles. But in key moments, Americans recognized that the rise of a small group of people, usually men who are commandeering the United States government, was a perversion of democracy. In the 1850s, the expansion of the past two decades into the new lands of the Southeast had permitted the rise of a group of spectacularly wealthy men. Abraham Lincoln helped to organize Westerners against a government takeover by elite Southern enslavers who argued that society advanced most efficiently when the capital produced by workers flowed to the top of society, where a few men would use it to develop the country for everyone. Lincoln warned that crowned kings, money kings and land kings would crush independent men. And he created a government that worked for ordinary men, a government of the people, by the people, for the people. A generation later, when industrialization disrupted the country, as westward expansion had before, the so called robber barons bent the government to their own purposes. Men like steel baron Andrew Carnegie explained that the best interests of the race are promoted by an industrial system which inevitably gives wealth to the few. But President Grover Cleveland warned, the gulf between employers and the employed is constantly widening and classes are rapidly forming, one comprising the very rich and powerful, while in another are found the toiling poor. Corporations, which should be the carefully restrained creatures of the law and the servants of the people, are fast becoming the people's masters. Republican President Theodore Roosevelt tried to soften the hard edges of industrialization by urging robber barons to moderate their behavior. When they ignored him, he turned finally to calling out the malefactors of great wealth, noting that there is no individual and no corporation so powerful that he or it stands above the possibility of punishment under the law. Our aim is to try to do something effective. Our purpose is to stamp out the evil. We shall seek to find the most effective device for this purpose, and we shall then use it, whether the device can be found in existing law or must be supplied by legislation. Moreover, when we thus take action against the wealth which works iniquity, we are acting in the interest of every man of property who. Who acts decently and fairly by his fellows. Theodore Roosevelt helped to launch the Progressive Era, but that moment passed, and in the 1930s, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, too, contended with wealthy men determined to retain control over the federal government. Running for reelection in 1936, he told a crowd at Madison Square Garden, for nearly four years you have had an administration which, instead of twirling its thumb sums, has rolled up its sleeves. We had to struggle with the old enemies of peace, business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war, profiteering. They had begun to consider the government of the United States as a mere appendage to their own affairs. We know now that government by organized money is just as dangerous as government by organized mob. Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today, he said. They are unanimous in their hate for me, and I welcome their hatred. Last night, after President Biden's warning, Google searches for the meaning of the word oligarchy. Spiked.
B
Letters from an American was produced at Soundscape Productions, Dedham, Massachusetts. Recorded with music composed by Michael Moss.
Podcast Summary: Letters from an American
Episode: January 16, 2025
Host/Author: Heather Cox Richardson
Release Date: January 17, 2025
In the January 16, 2025 episode of Letters from an American, Heather Cox Richardson delves into the escalating economic inequality in the United States and draws parallels with historical instances where wealth and power threatened democratic principles. The episode examines President Joe Biden's warnings about the rise of an oligarchy, the contrasting policies of former President Donald Trump, and echoes from America's past where leaders grappled with similar challenges.
Biden’s Final Address and Oligarchy Concerns
The episode opens with President Joe Biden's final address to the nation, where he warns of an emerging oligarchy in America. Biden emphasizes that the concentration of extreme wealth, power, and influence poses a fundamental threat to democracy, individual freedoms, and the equitable opportunity for all Americans to succeed.
"President Joe Biden issued a warning that an oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms, and a fair shot for everyone to get ahead."
— [00:00]
Historical Context: The Great Compression and Great Divergence
Richardson outlines the economic landscape by contrasting two pivotal periods in American history:
The Great Compression (1933-1981): Characterized by robust business regulations, progressive taxation, strong unions, and a social safety net that collectively reduced wealth and income disparities. During this era, every income group in the U.S. saw improved economic standings.
The Great Divergence (1981-2021): Marked by deregulation, tax cuts favoring the wealthy and corporations, offshore manufacturing, and weakened unions. These factors contributed to a massive transfer of $50 trillion from the bottom 90% of Americans to the top 1%.
Biden’s Policies to Mitigate Inequality
Biden's administration attempted to counteract the Great Divergence through several initiatives:
Revitalizing Manufacturing and Fostering Competition: Efforts aimed at bringing back manufacturing jobs and enhancing competitive markets.
Increased Business Oversight: Implementing stricter regulations to curb excessive corporate power.
Strengthening the Social Safety Net: Passing the Inflation Reduction Act, which, among other things, allowed Medicare to negotiate drug prices, exemplified by capping insulin at $35 for seniors.
These measures led to the creation of full employment, enabling individuals at the lower end of the economic spectrum to ascend to higher-paying positions. As a result, during Biden's tenure, the income gap between the 90th and 10th percentiles decreased by 25%.
"With the pharmaceutical industry capping insulin at $35 for seniors, for example, his policies worked primarily by creating full employment, which enabled those at the bottom of the economy to move to higher paying jobs."
— [02:45]
Trump’s Appeal and Association with Billionaires
Contrasting Biden’s approach, Donald Trump capitalized on voter discontent stemming from post-pandemic inflation and portrayed himself as a protector of ordinary Americans against the "Democratic elite." Upon his election, Trump aligned closely with some of the world's wealthiest individuals, most notably Elon Musk, who had significantly invested in Trump's campaign.
"Donald Trump convinced voters hurt by the inflation that stalked the country after the coronavirus pandemic shutdown that he would bring prices down and protect ordinary Americans from the Democratic elite that he said didn't care about them."
— [04:10]
Elon Musk and the New Administration
Elon Musk's substantial investment resulted in a meteoric financial gain, making him an influential figure within Trump's administration. Musk, alongside Vivek Ramaswamy, was appointed to lead the Department of Government Efficiency with an ambitious goal of slashing $2 trillion from the U.S. budget, a move that risked imposing hardships on the American populace.
"Musk vowed to cut $2 trillion out of the US budget even if it inflicted hardship on the American people."
— [05:30]
Tech Titans at the Forefront
The episode highlights the involvement of other tech moguls in Trump's inauguration, signaling a significant shift in governmental influence:
These individuals, collectively worth nearly a trillion dollars, represent a concentrated concentration of wealth and technological power interfacing directly with government operations.
Policy Stances from Trump’s Treasury Nominee
Billionaire Scott Besant, Trump's nominee for Treasury Secretary, emphasized the importance of maintaining the 2017 Trump tax cuts, labeling it the paramount economic issue. However, he opposed raising the federal minimum wage beyond the existing $7.25, reflecting a conservative stance on labor economics.
"Extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts was the single most important economic issue of the day. But he said he did not support raising the federal minimum wage, which has been $7.25 since 2009."
— [06:50]
Public Discontent and Corporate Misconduct
Recent events, such as the shooting of the CEO of United Health Care and revelations of the company's unethical practices, underscore the growing public unease with economic inequality and corporate malfeasance.
"On December 4, 2024, a young man shot the chief executive officer of the health insurance company United Health Care... overcharged cancer patients by more than 1000% for life saving drugs."
— [07:20]
Richardson draws parallels between current events and historical efforts to combat concentrated wealth and power in America:
Abraham Lincoln and the Western Opposition to Southern Elites
In the 1850s, as America expanded westward, Lincoln organized Westerners to resist the domination of Southern elites who advocated for a system where capital concentrated at the top would drive national development. Lincoln warned against "crowned kings, money kings and land kings," advocating for a government that truly serves the people.
"Lincoln warned that crowned kings, money kings and land kings would crush independent men. And he created a government that worked for ordinary men, a government of the people, by the people, for the people."
— [07:55]
Theodore Roosevelt and the Progressive Era
As industrialization surged, figures like Andrew Carnegie justified the concentration of wealth, while President Theodore Roosevelt sought to mitigate its harsh impacts. Roosevelt advocated for moderating the excesses of the "robber barons" and underscored the principle that no individual or corporation stands above the law.
"We shall seek to find the most effective device for this purpose, and we shall then use it, whether the device can be found in existing law or must be supplied by legislation."
— [08:30]
Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s Battle Against Monopolistic Forces
During the 1930s, FDR confronted wealthy interests that sought to manipulate the federal government. In his 1936 campaign, FDR denounced the unification of business and financial monopolies as a threat to peace and democracy, asserting the danger of "government by organized money."
"Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today, he said. They are unanimous in their hate for me, and I welcome their hatred."
— [08:12]
Heather Cox Richardson ties the historical narrative to present-day concerns, highlighting President Biden's warning about oligarchy as a pivotal moment that reawakens American vigilance against the concentration of wealth and power. The spike in Google searches for "oligarchy" following Biden's address indicates a growing public awareness and anxiety over these issues.
"Last night, after President Biden's warning, Google searches for the meaning of the word oligarchy spiked."
— [08:54]
Letters from an American was produced at Soundscape Productions in Dedham, Massachusetts. The episode was recorded with original music composed by Michael Moss.
This episode of Letters from an American offers a comprehensive examination of economic inequality in America, drawing crucial lessons from history to contextualize today’s political and economic challenges. Heather Cox Richardson effectively bridges past and present, urging listeners to recognize and address the persistent threats posed by concentrated wealth and power to democracy.