Loading summary
Heather Cox Richardson
July 7, 2025 at about 10:30 this morning, local time, heavily armed masked agents in trucks, armored vehicles, a helicopter on foot and on horseback accompanied by a gun mounted on a truck raided the MacArthur park area of Los Angeles. Journalist Mel Buer reported that agents from Customs and Border Patrol, or cbp, the National Guard and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ice, brought what she called a massive federal presence. Fox News Channel personnel were embedded with the raiders and broadcast throughout the operation, suggesting that it was designed for the media as a show of force to intimidate opponents. CBP brought its own press team, and its people were also taking photos of bystanders. After Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass arrived and spoke with Border Patrol Chief Gregory Bovino, the agents left. It is not clear that there was a specific target for the raid or that anyone was arrested later, bovino told Bill Milugan of the Fox News Channel. I don't work for Karen Bass. Better get used to us now because this is going to be normal very soon. We will go anywhere, anytime we want. In Los Angeles, immigrants rights group sued Bovina last week to block what they call an ongoing pattern and practice of flouting the Constitution and federal law during immigration raids. Steve Bannon of Military.com reports that about 70 National Guard troops have been deployed to the new detention facility in the Florida Everglades as the administration leans harder on the military to enforce its nationwide immigration crackdown. Unlike the National Guard troops Trump federalized in Los Angeles, these troops are operating as state troops under Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. Another 8,500 active duty and National Guard troops are stationed along the border between the US and Mexico. The Trump administration is also sending 200 marines to Florida to aid ICE, part of a push to increase deportations by using active duty troops. The U.S. marine Corps has launched a pilot program to station ICE agents at Camp Pendleton in California, Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia, and Marine Corps Base Hawaii. Sarah Rumpf Whitten of Fox News writes that the plan is to strengthen security at those bases, although University of Tampa defense professor Abby Hall Blanco pointed out it gives kind of an odd impression that the Marine Corps is not handling its own security sufficiently. Having known quite a few Marines in my time, I can't imagine that they would find that to be a particularly flattering interpretation. As Harvard sociologist Theda Skocpol pointed out in Talking Points Memo, it appears that officials in the Trump administration are using immigration as a way to establish a police state. Indeed, they are using the concept that presidents have control of foreign affairs as a way to work around the laws in place to prevent a dictatorship. In its 2024 Donald J. Trump v. United States decision, the Supreme Court majority held that a former president has absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority, as well as presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. In April 2025, the court specified that it considered foreign affairs to fall within a president's constitutional authority. Writing in Nome vi Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia that the executive branch was owed deference in the conduct of foreign affairs. Although the framers of the Constitution put the power to make laws in the hands of Congress, they divided power in foreign affairs between Congress and the president. Almost immediately, presidents began to assert their authority over foreign affairs to noting that the Constitution gave them power to appoint ambassadors and negotiate treaties, and pointing to the president's role as commander in chief of the army. The branches have tussled over this power ever since. But as James Goldgeiger and Elizabeth N. Saunders wrote in Foreign affairs, presidential power over foreign affairs has grown dramatically since 2000. After the attacks of September 11, 2001 May, members of Congress were unwilling to appear soft on terror and so allowed President George W. Bush great leeway in the nation's war on terror, even after it became clear that Bush's invasion of Iraq in 2003 was failing in foreign affairs. Last month, Saunders wrote that a lack of accountability for either the failures of the Iraq war or the 2008 International Financial Crisis fed the idea that the president could make sweeping decisions about both foreign intervention and the international economy without check by Congress. On February 12, 2025, the Trump administration made clear that its members intended to expand Trump's power by pushing the boundaries of what foreign affairs entails. In an executive order, Trump claimed the Constitution vests the the power to conduct foreign policy in the president of the United States. Trump's actual work in foreign affairs has been different from what he promised during his presidential campaign. His vow that he could end Russia's war against Ukraine with one phone call has resulted only in Russian President Vladimir Putin's accelerating his attacks on Ukraine. As Foreign affairs journalist Anne Applebaum wrote on July 4 in the Atlantic, it is clear that Putin believes he can conquer all of Ukraine because Trump is abandoning the long standing US Bipartisan support for Ukraine and pivoting the US to back Russia. Last week, the administration said it would not send Ukraine a large shipment of weapons already funded under President Joe Biden. It claimed that US Stockpiles of weapons are insufficient a claim former Biden officials and independent analysts contradict. Applebaum notes that Russia has interpreted the change as a sign that the US Is ending its support for Ukraine. The US is also essentially lifting the economic sanctions that have hamstrung Russia's economy. By not adjusting sanctions to combat developing Russian workarounds, the administration is allowing Russia to rebuild its economy. In addition, the Trump administration has stopped countering Russian disinformation around the world, while Trump appointees, including Trump's main negotiator with Russia, Steve Witkoff, regularly parrot Russian propaganda. Trump's launching of strikes against Iran's nuclear weapon production sites without input from Congress earned pushback from Congress members who noted that the president's authority to launch emergency operations depends on an actual emergency. Trump's own director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard told Congress in March that the intelligence community assessed Iran was not in fact building a nuclear weapon. Then. Trump's claim that he had totally obliterated Iran's nuclear program turned out to be exaggerated, although as journalists questioned his statement, the administration doubled down on it. Today, Barack Ravid of Axios reported that Israeli officials believe Trump will greenlight further Israeli attacks on Iran. Trump has said twice since the US strikes that the US could attack Iran again if Iran renews its nuclear program. But the claim to domestic power based in the president's alleged right to control over foreign affairs has fueled much of the administration's domestic agenda. The administration claimed the power to render undocumented Venezuelans to the notorious terrorist seacot prison in El Salvador by arguing that the Venezuelan government was sending members of the MS.13 gang to invade the US after wrongfully delivering Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador in violation of a court order. The administration claimed courts could not order him returned to the US because that order would interfere with Trump's ability to conduct foreign affairs. Documents filed in court today said Salvadoran officials told the United nations that the US military retained jurisdiction over the migrants it sent to El Salvador, undermining the administration's insistence that it has no control over migrants once they are out of U.S. territory. El Salvador simply had an agreement with the U.S. to use the Salvadoran prison system to detain U.S. prisoners. They said. In this context, the jurisdiction and legal responsibility for these persons lie exclusively with the competent foreign authorities by virtue of international agreements signed and in accordance with the principles of sovereignty and international cooperation in criminal matters. In a lawsuit against the administration, Abrego Garcia says he was tortured in El Salvador, severely beaten, deprived of sleep, inadequately fed, denied bathroom facilities and tortured psychologically. He says he lost 5031 pounds in two weeks. Today, the administration ended temporary protection from deportation for about 72,000 migrants from Honduras and another 4,000 from Nicaragua. The decision strips them of their legal status and echoes similar decisions made about migrants from Afghanistan, Cameroon, Haiti, Nepal and Venezuela. A federal court has blocked the early termination of protected status for Haitians. Letters from an American was written and read by Heather Cox Richardson. It was produced at Soundscape Productions, Dedham, MA. Recorded with music composed by Michael Moss, it.
Letters from an American: July 7, 2025 Episode Summary
Produced by Soundscape Productions, Dedham, MA. Narrated by Heather Cox Richardson.
On the morning of July 7, 2025, at approximately 10:30 AM local time, a significant federal operation unfolded in the MacArthur Park area of Los Angeles. Heavily armed and masked agents arrived in trucks, armored vehicles, and a helicopter. Accompanied by foot and horseback units equipped with gun-mounted trucks, the agents conducted a large-scale raid.
Heather Cox Richardson begins the episode at [00:07], detailing the scene and the scale of the operation.
Mel Buer, a journalist, reported that agents from multiple federal agencies—Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the National Guard, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)—maintained a "massive federal presence" throughout the raid. The operation was notably broadcasted live by embedded Fox News Channel personnel, indicating a deliberate show of force intended to intimidate opposition.
Richardson notes at [00:07] that CBP had its own press team capturing photos of bystanders, suggesting media involvement was part of the strategy.
Upon the arrival of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, who conversed with Border Patrol Chief Gregory Bovino, the agents ultimately withdrew. Bovino later told Bill Milugan of Fox News that there were no specific targets or arrests made. However, Bovino ominously stated, "I don't work for Karen Bass. Better get used to us now because this is going to be normal very soon. We will go anywhere, anytime we want" ([00:07]).
This remark underscores a concerning shift towards more aggressive and autonomous federal immigration enforcement.
The episode highlights a significant escalation in the use of military forces for immigration purposes. Steve Bannon of Military.com reports that approximately 70 National Guard troops have been deployed to a new detention facility in the Florida Everglades. This move is part of the administration's broader strategy to intensify a nationwide immigration crackdown.
In contrast to the federalized National Guard troops in Los Angeles, these new troops operate under the authority of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, maintaining their status as state troops ([00:07]).
Additionally, there are 8,500 active-duty and National Guard troops stationed along the U.S.-Mexico border. The administration has further augmented this presence by deploying 200 Marines to Florida to support ICE efforts, reflecting an increased reliance on military personnel for immigration enforcement.
The U.S. Marine Corps has initiated a pilot program to station ICE agents at key bases: Camp Pendleton in California, Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia, and Marine Corps Base Hawaii. Sarah Rumpf Whitten of Fox News explains that the goal is to "strengthen security at those bases." However, Abby Hall Blanco, a defense professor at the University of Tampa, criticizes this approach, questioning the Marine Corps' own security capabilities and suggesting that such moves may be perceived as undermining military competence ([00:07]).
A pivotal legal backdrop to the administration's actions is the Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in Donald J. Trump v. United States. The Court's majority ruled that a former president enjoys absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his constitutional authority and presumptive immunity for his official acts ([00:07]).
In April 2025, the Court further clarified that foreign affairs fall within a president’s constitutional authority, emphasizing that the executive branch deserves deference in conducting foreign affairs. This interpretation aligns with historical assertions where presidents have leveraged their roles to expand executive power, particularly in appointing ambassadors, negotiating treaties, and serving as commander in chief ([00:07]).
James Goldgeiger and Elizabeth N. Saunders of Foreign Affairs observe that presidential authority over foreign affairs has significantly expanded since the early 2000s. Post-9/11, President George W. Bush was granted considerable leeway in the war on terror, setting a precedent for future administrations to assert broad executive powers ([00:07]).
On February 12, 2025, the Trump administration formalized its intent to broaden presidential power in foreign affairs through an executive order. This order asserted that the Constitution grants the president exclusive authority to conduct foreign policy, a stance that diverges from traditional checks and balances.
Despite his campaign promises, Trump’s actual foreign policy has not delivered on key assertions. For instance, his claim that a single phone call could end Russia's war against Ukraine has failed, resulting instead in Vladimir Putin intensifying military actions in Ukraine.
Foreign affairs journalist Anne Applebaum wrote in The Atlantic on July 4 that Putin perceives US support for Ukraine as waning, partly due to the administration's pivot towards backing Russia ([00:07]).
Furthermore, the administration announced it would not send a previously funded large shipment of weapons to Ukraine, citing insufficient US weapon stockpiles—a claim disputed by former Biden officials and independent analysts. Additionally, the Trump administration has relaxed economic sanctions against Russia, inadvertently allowing Russia to rebuild its economy by not addressing emerging Russian workarounds.
The administration's foreign policy extends to Iran, where Trump's Marine Corps Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, testified to Congress in March that Iran was not actively developing nuclear weapons, contradicting Trump's public assertions. Nonetheless, Trump launched strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities without congressional approval, exacerbating tensions.
Journalists have criticized Trump's exaggerated claims of crippling Iran's nuclear program, and administration officials, including Steve Witkoff, Trump's primary negotiator with Russia, have been accused of propagating Russian disinformation ([00:07]).
Barack Ravid of Axios reports that Israeli officials anticipate further Israeli attacks on Iran with Trump's possible approval, as Trump has threatened additional strikes should Iran renew its nuclear ambitions.
The administration's assertion of expansive foreign affairs authority has significant domestic repercussions, particularly concerning immigration. By claiming executive power over foreign affairs, the administration has attempted to justify severe immigration policies, including the deportation of undocumented Venezuelans to the Seacot Prison in El Salvador. This action was rationalized by alleging that the Venezuelan government was orchestrating MS-13 gang activities within the US, a justification that violates court orders.
Legal challenges have emerged, with documents filed in court indicating that Salvadoran officials informed the United Nations that the US military retains jurisdiction over migrants sent to El Salvador. This undermines the administration's position, emphasizing that jurisdiction and responsibility for these individuals lie with the foreign authorities, in accordance with international agreements and principles of sovereignty.
Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man wrongfully deported to El Salvador, alleges severe torture and human rights violations, including physical and psychological abuse, during his detention ([00:07]).
In a broader policy shift, the administration recently terminated temporary protection from deportation for approximately 72,000 migrants from Honduras and 4,000 from Nicaragua, echoing similar actions against migrants from Afghanistan, Cameroon, Haiti, Nepal, and Venezuela. However, a federal court has blocked the early termination of protected status for Haitian migrants, challenging the administration's policies.
Several experts and commentators provide critical perspectives on the administration's strategies:
University of Tampa Defense Professor Abby Hall Blanco criticizes the Marine Corps' involvement in ICE operations, suggesting it reflects poorly on military professionalism.
Harvard Sociologist Theda Skocpol, as referenced in Talking Points Memo, argues that the Trump administration is leveraging immigration policies to establish a police state, using presidential authority over foreign affairs to circumvent constitutional checks and prevent the rise of a dictatorship ([00:07]).
James Goldgeiger and Elizabeth N. Saunders highlight the historical growth of presidential power in foreign affairs, noting the lack of accountability for previous administrations' foreign and economic decisions has paved the way for current overreaches.
Anne Applebaum underscores the negative impact of the administration's foreign policy on international alliances and geopolitical stability, particularly regarding Ukraine and Russia.
The July 7, 2025 episode of Letters from an American by Heather Cox Richardson meticulously examines the Trump administration's aggressive expansion of executive power, both domestically and internationally. Through detailed accounts of federal raids, military involvement in immigration enforcement, and sweeping foreign policy maneuvers, the episode paints a comprehensive picture of a government increasingly operating beyond traditional constitutional boundaries.
The interplay between Supreme Court decisions, executive orders, and on-the-ground actions reveals a trend towards centralized authority, often at the expense of legal norms and international relations. Expert analyses further illuminate the potential long-term implications of these policies, highlighting concerns over the erosion of civil liberties and the destabilization of geopolitical alliances.
For listeners seeking an in-depth understanding of the historical and political dynamics shaping contemporary U.S. policies, this episode serves as a crucial resource, encapsulating the complexities and consequences of unchecked executive power.
This summary was generated based on the transcript provided and aims to encapsulate the key discussions, insights, and conclusions presented in the July 7, 2025 episode of "Letters from an American." For a complete listening experience, visit Heather Cox Richardson's Substack.