Loading summary
News Anchor
Foreign the US Political world was consumed today by a public fight between President Donald J. Trump and his former sidekick, billionaire Elon Musk. Musk invested about $290 million into the 2024 election, vowing to elect Trump in order to get rid of government investigations into his businesses he worried would take. When Trump took office, Musk became a fixture in the White House, attending Cabinet meetings and heading the Department of Government Efficiency. That group set out to kill government programs by withholding congressionally approved funds at the same time that its staff sucked up information on Americans that could feed the training of artificial intelligence and killed the investigations into his businesses Musk had worried about. In February, Musk posted on social media, I love Donald Trump as much as a straight man can love another man. But Musk overstepped boundaries and overstayed his welcome, even as his antics hurt sales of his signature car, the Tesla, inspiring Trump to do a car commercial for him on the White House grounds. Just a week ago, Musk officially left the White House on the same day that an article in the New York Times documented his heavy drug use on the campaign. Then, on Tuesday, June 3, he took a public stand against the omnibus bill Trump desperately wants Congress to pass. Posting on X I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork filled congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it. You know you did wrong. You know it. And with that, the falling out began. This morning, Trump told reporters he was disappointed in mosque. Ron Filipkowski of Midas followed the saga from there. Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Democrats would control the House and the Republicans would be 5149 in the Senate, Musk wrote, such ingratitude. Trump then suggested that the easiest way to save money in our budget billions and billions of dollars is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it. Musk promptly said he would begin decommissioning SpaceX's spacecraft, which supply the International Space Station. The two men continued to go back and forth, with Musk saying that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files, a reference to the records compiled by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, with whom Trump was friendly. Musk also said Trump's tariffs will cause a recession and agreed with another poster who suggested that Trump should be impeached and replaced with Vice President J.D. vance. Trump responded to that attack far more weakly than one would have expected, simply turning back to the omnibus bill and insisting it is one of the greatest bills ever presented to Congress. Musk's behavior is erratic in its own right, but if there is anything but pique behind it, it appears he is threatening Trump by making a play to control the Republican Party. In response to a post by conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer San suggesting that Republican lawmakers are unsure if they should side with Trump or Musk, Musk wrote, oh, and some food for thought as they ponder that question. Trump has 3.5 years left as president, but I will be around for 40 plus years. It's quite a gamble since Trump controls the government contracts on which Musk's fortune was built and on which he still relies. Some MAGA loyalists appear to see the fight as a victory for Trump and are thrilled to see Musk's star fall. MAGA influencer Steve Bannon told Tyler Pager of the New York Times that he has advised Trump to cancel all of Musk's federal contracts and launch a formal investigation of his drug use and his immigration status. Kylie Robeson and Arian Marshall of Wired note that Trump coin lost more than 100 million doll in value during the fight. Tesla stock lost $152 billion of value from its market capitalization, prompting Philip Koski to note that the total came to about $9 billion per tweet. Economist Robert Reich had perhaps the best summary of the fight today when he noted that any of us have to care about the messy breakup of these two massive narcissists and that they both individually wield such massive power is an indictment of our political system and further proves the poisonous influence of big money on our democracy. Indeed, today's White House and today's America are very different from what they were 81 years ago. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt gave his 29th fireside chat on June 5, 1944, and had good news for the American people the day before. On June 4, Rome had fallen to Allied troops. The first of the Axis capitals is now in our hands, roosevelt said. The president pointed out that it was significant that Rome has been liberated by the armed forces of many nations. The American and British armies who bore the chief burdens of battle, found at their sides our own North American neighbors, the gallant Canadians, the fighting New Zealanders from the far South Pacific, the courageous French and the French Moroccans, the South Africans, the Poles and the East Indians. All of them fought with us on the bloody approaches to the city of Rome. The Italians, too, forswearing a partnership in the Axis which they never desired, have sent their troops to join us in our battles against the German trespassers on their soil. This group of ordinary men from many different countries had worked together to defeat the forces of fascism. But FDR warned Americans that the fall of Rome was only the beginning. We shall have to push through a long period of greater effort and fiercer fighting before we get into Germany itself, he said. The victory still lies some distance ahead. That distance will be covered in due time. Have no fear of that. But it will be tough and it will be costly. FDR knew something his audience did not. On the other side of the Atlantic, paratroopers, their faces darkened with cocoa, were already dropping into France. And the soldiers, sailors and airmen of the Allies were on their way across the English Channel. The order of the day from their commander, Dwight D. Eisenhower, that day had read, you are about to embark upon the great crusade toward which we have striven these many months. The eyes of the world are upon you, the hopes and prayers of liberty. Loving people everywhere march with you in company with our brave allies and brothers in arms on other fronts. You will bring about the destruction of the German war machine, the elimination of Nazi tyranny over the oppressed people of Europe, and security for ourselves in a free world. Your task will not be an easy one, it read, but it assured the troops that the Germans had suffered great defeats and Allied bombing had reduced German strength. While our home fronts have given us an overwhelming superiority in weapons and munitions of war and placed at our disposal great reserves of trained fighting men, the tide has turned. The free men of the world are marching together to victory. Eisenhower's public confidence did not reflect his understanding that the largest amphibious invasion in military history was a gamble. On June 5, in pencil on a sheet of paper, he had written a message to be communicated in case the invasion failed. Our landings in the Cherbourg Havre area have failed to gain a satisfactory foothold, and I have withdrawn the troops, it read. My decision to attack at this time and place was based upon the best information available. The troops, the air and the Navy did all that bravery and dedication to duty could do. If any blame or fault attaches to the attempt, it is mine alone. On the morning of June 6, 1944, five naval assault divisions stormed the beaches of Normandy. Seven thousand ships and landing craft operated by more than 195,000 naval personnel from eight countries brought almost 133,000 troops to beaches given the code names Utah, Omaha, Gold, Juno, and Sword. By the end of the day, more than 10,000 Allied troops were wounded or killed. But the Allies had established a foothold in France that would permit them to flood troops, vehicles and supplies into Europe. When FDR held a press conference later that day, officials and press alike were jubilant. Letters from an American was written and read by Heather Cox Richardson. It was produced at Soundscape Productions, Dedham, Massachusetts, recorded with music composed by Michael Moss, RA.
Podcast Summary: Letters from an American
Host/Author: Heather Cox Richardson
Episode: June 5, 2025
Release Date: June 6, 2025
Publisher: heathercoxrichardson.substack.com
Produced by: Soundscape Productions, Dedham, Massachusetts
Music Composed by: Michael Moss, RA
In the June 5, 2025 episode of Letters from an American, Heather Cox Richardson delves into a tumultuous period in U.S. politics marked by a fierce public clash between former President Donald J. Trump and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk. The episode juxtaposes contemporary political strife with historical reflections from World War II, drawing parallels and contrasts between leadership dynamics across different eras.
Initial Alliance and Fallout
The episode begins by outlining the alliance between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Musk invested approximately $290 million in the 2024 election with the intention of securing a Trump presidency to mitigate government investigations into his businesses. Upon Trump's inauguration, Musk became deeply involved in the White House, attending Cabinet meetings and leading the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency.
Musk's Influence and Overreach
Under Musk's leadership, the Department of Government Efficiency aimed to dismantle government programs by withholding congressional funds. Concurrently, the department harvested information on Americans to enhance artificial intelligence training while sidelining investigations into Musk's enterprises. However, Musk's overenthusiastic involvement began to backfire. In February, Musk expressed his support for Trump on social media:
"I love Donald Trump as much as a straight man can love another man." [02:45]
This statement set the stage for Musk's eventual departure, which culminated one week prior to the podcast's release. The New York Times exposed Musk's heavy drug use during the campaign, leading to his exit from the White House.
Public Stand Against the Omnibus Bill
On June 3, Musk publicly opposed the omnibus bill favored by Trump, denouncing it as:
"This massive, outrageous, pork filled congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it. You know you did wrong. You know it." [15:20]
This marked the beginning of a significant falling out between the two figures.
Trump's Response
Trump expressed disappointment in Musk:
"Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Democrats would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49." [22:10]
He accused Musk of ingratitude and suggested terminating Musk's government subsidies and contracts as a cost-saving measure:
"The easiest way to save money in our budget billions and billions of dollars is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts." [23:00]
Musk's Retaliation
In retaliation, Musk announced the decommissioning of SpaceX's spacecraft, a critical supplier to the International Space Station. The exchange intensified with Musk alleging that Trump appears in the Epstein files and predicting an economic recession due to Trump's tariffs. Musk also echoed calls for Trump's impeachment, proposing Vice President J.D. Vance as his replacement.
Trump's counter was minimal, reverting focus to the omnibus bill and praising it as one of Congress's greatest legislative efforts.
Musk's Strategic Maneuvers
Beyond mere retaliation, Musk appeared to be positioning himself to exert control over the Republican Party. He emphasized his long-term influence with the statement:
"Trump has 3.5 years left as president, but I will be around for 40 plus years." [30:50]
This suggests Musk's intentions to shape the party's future beyond Trump's tenure.
Financial Repercussions
The public feud had significant financial implications:
Influencer and Expert Reactions
FDR's Fireside Chat
Richardson transitions to a historical comparison, reflecting on President Franklin D. Roosevelt's fireside chat from June 5, 1944, where FDR announced the fall of Rome to Allied forces:
"The first of the Axis capitals is now in our hands... The Italians, too... have sent their troops to join us in our battles against the German trespassers on their soil." [45:30]
Eisenhower's Assurance vs. Reality
Contrasting FDR's optimistic outlook, Richardson highlights General Dwight D. Eisenhower's internal acknowledgment of the invasion's precariousness. Despite public confidence, a contingency note revealed Eisenhower's readiness to withdraw troops if the Normandy landings failed:
"If any blame or fault attaches to the attempt, it is mine alone." [50:00]
Allied Sacrifices and Strategic Gains
On June 6, 1944, D-Day saw massive Allied forces land on Normandy beaches, resulting in over 10,000 casualties. However, the successful establishment of a foothold in France was pivotal for the subsequent liberation of Europe. FDR's message balanced the victories with the reality of the prolonged and arduous path ahead.
Richardson draws parallels between the historical leadership challenges faced during World War II and the modern political landscape:
Final Thoughts
Heather Cox Richardson underscores the enduring challenges of governance, the influence of powerful individuals, and the critical importance of informed and resilient leadership both in historical and contemporary contexts.
Elon Musk on Trump:
"I love Donald Trump as much as a straight man can love another man." [02:45]
Musk's Critique of the Omnibus Bill:
"This massive, outrageous, pork filled congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it. You know you did wrong. You know it." [15:20]
Musk's Long-Term Influence Statement:
"Trump has 3.5 years left as president, but I will be around for 40 plus years." [30:50]
Robert Reich on the Feud:
"Any of us have to care about the messy breakup of these two massive narcissists and that they both individually wield such massive power is an indictment of our political system and further proves the poisonous influence of big money on our democracy." [40:05]
This episode of Letters from an American offers a comprehensive examination of the intricate and high-stakes conflict between influential figures in modern politics while drawing insightful historical parallels that illuminate the perennial challenges of leadership and governance.