Podcast Summary
Episode Overview
Title: Should We Make America a “Christian Nation” Again?!
Podcast: Live Free with Josh Howerton
Host: Lakepointe Church
Date: September 29, 2025
Guests: Pastor Josh Howerton, Pastor Paul Cunningham, Carlos Arazan
This episode addresses two hot-button topics in contemporary Christian and political culture: the legitimacy and nature of modern Christian prophecy, and the contentious subject of "Christian nationalism" in America. The hosts tackle the theological, historical, and practical nuances of these issues—especially as Christian influence in public life is increasingly scrutinized—offering biblical insights, practical guidance, and personal stories along the way.
Key Discussion Points and Insights
1. Show & Tell and Church Updates
- [01:11-07:32]
- Josh opens with a personal anecdote about a Pete Rose-autographed baseball, segueing into an update about Lakepointe Church’s recent spiritual momentum, increased attendance, and mass baptisms following national tragedies.
- “Last weekend in-person attendance was 27,000…we baptized nearly 700 people. College students sitting on the stairs, Bibles in their laps…I’ve never seen anything like it.” (Josh, 06:29)
2. Deep Dive: New Testament Prophecy vs. Old Testament Prophecy
- [07:32–41:00]
Scriptural Foundations
- Josh and Paul explore Acts 20-21, where prophetic messages received by Paul and other disciples appear contradictory—sparking discussion on differentiating prophecy under the Old and New Covenants.
- “Paul apparently receives a prophetic word in Acts 20 that specifically says, constrained by the Spirit to go to Jerusalem. You have the apostles apparently giving a prophetic word...telling Paul not to go...This gets into the whole issue of what is New Testament prophecy?” (Josh, 08:35)
Main Insights
- Old Testament Prophets: Carried divine authority; to oppose the prophet was to oppose God; prophecy was ‘inerrant’ and commanded obedience.
- “Thus saith the Lord...I don’t write the mail. I don’t edit the mail. I’m here to deliver the mail.” (Josh, 21:14)
- New Testament Prophets: Prophecy functions as a spiritual gift; must be weighed and tested; open to human error in interpretation/delivery; invites discernment rather than requiring obedience.
- “Old Testament prophecy demanded obedience. New Testament prophecy…invites discernment.” (Paul, 31:35)
Practical Guidance for Evaluating Modern Prophecy
- Evaluate the Messenger: Spiritual maturity and fruitfulness.
- Evaluate the Message: Does it align with Scripture? Scripture is the 'Supreme Court'—everything else is a 'lower court.'
- Evaluate the Motive: Is it delivered in the spirit of strengthening, encouraging, and building up (1 Cor. 14)?
- Discernment Framework: Advice to use the “Spirit of God, Word of God, and people of God” when weighing a prophetic word.
- “The abuse of a thing does not negate the use of a thing.” (Josh, 25:25)
Notable Quotes
- “In the Old Testament, you judged the prophet. In the New Testament, you judge the prophecy.” (Josh, 33:14)
3. Personal Testimonies: Prophecy in Practice
- [54:53–58:24]
- Each host shares a personal experience of giving or receiving a prophetic word, emphasizing its role in encouragement, direction, and confirmation:
- Josh—comfort during anxiety attacks via a prophetic dream confirmed later by counseling.
- Paul—vocational calling confirmed through multiple unsolicited prophetic affirmations.
- Carlos—lifelong prophetic words about ministry, marriage, and calling, later realized in adulthood.
- “We got stories, we got crazy stories, but God speaks that way…that’s been an absolute net positive.” (Carlos, 57:49)
4. Christian Nationalism: Should We Want a "Christian Nation"?
- [62:05–113:45]
Setting the Stage
- The recent Charlie Kirk Memorial catalyzed a national conversation around the fusion of Christianity and American public life. The hosts analyze reactions, media framing, and political rhetoric (“scary Christian nationalism”).
Media & Political Clips
- [Marco Rubio’s Memorial Speech]: Emphasis on explicit Gospel proclamation by political leaders.
- [Hillary Clinton Interview]: Warns against reviving a nation “dominated by…a certain religion,” interpreted as a veiled critique of Christian foundations.
- “You have the leaders of one party who will platform, elect, and cheer for an explicitly Christian worldview…and the leaders of another party that will oppose it and vilify it…” (Josh, 65:31)
Defining Terms and Debunking Scare Labels
- “Whoever controls the terms wins the argument.” (Josh, 70:14)
- ‘Christian nationalism’ is often a scare label—used to delegitimize any Christian influence in national life or public policy.
- The panel breaks down:
- Nationalism: Preference for nation-state governance over globalism, viewed as biblically normative (Acts 17).
- Christian: Advocacy for Christian principles shaping laws, not imposition via state church or theocracy.
- “Every government is some form of a theocracy. The question is, who’s Theo?” (Josh, 82:16)
Separation of Church and State
- The “separation” is not in the Constitution; rather, there’s an establishment clause to prevent a state-imposed church but not to keep religious conviction from public life.
- “There’s a difference between…sharing the Gospel and legislating forced worship practices. Depending on how you define Christian nationalism, I might agree or not.” (Paul, 92:54)
Addressing Common Objections
- Imposing moral values? “Yep, and so are you…The question isn’t ‘is morality going to be imposed?’ The question is ‘whose morality is going to be imposed?’” (Josh, 78:17)
- What about minorities/atheists? “Christian values have made nations more free, compassionate, and prosperous—even for non-Christians.” (Carlos, paraphrased, 88:09)
The Positive Case for Christian Influence
- Western legal, moral, and social advancements draw directly from Christian roots; even prominent atheists like Dawkins and public intellectuals like Tom Holland prefer Christian societies (88:09–89:16).
- “The cut-flower syndrome”—as Western nations sever from their Christian roots, the values borrowed from Christianity wither and die over time (90:37).
5. Politics and the Mission of the Church
- [101:01–113:45]
- The Great Commission includes teaching nations to obey all that Jesus commanded—implicating societal, legal, and cultural application, not just personal salvation.
- The church should “walk and chew gum,” boldly engaging both evangelism and shaping the public square for the Gospel’s advance.
- “It doesn’t matter how many righteous policies you put forward; unless we’re great at evangelism, we don’t have anybody to vote for them.” (Josh, 112:14)
- Cites Ryan Burge’s data: higher church participation correlates with less liberal political identification, regardless of race—suggesting that conservative governance environments are more conducive to the growth and plausibility of Christianity.
- “Do both...Go into the voting booth and vote your values, and then go share that faith with your family…Do both.” (Paul, 113:29)
Notable Quotes & Timestamps
- “The abuse of a thing does not negate the use of a thing.”
— Josh Howerton, [25:25] - “Old Testament prophecy demanded obedience. New Testament prophecy…invites discernment.”
— Paul Cunningham, [31:35] - “In the Old Testament, you judged the prophet. In the New Testament, you judge the prophecy.”
— Josh Howerton, [33:14] - “Every government is some form of a theocracy. The question is, who’s Theo?”
— Josh Howerton, [82:16] - “Imposing morality?… Yep, and so are you...whose morality is going to be imposed?”
— Josh Howerton, [78:17] - “Christianity is a religion of invitation. Islam is a religion of imposition.”
— Carlos Arazan, paraphrased [94:31] - “It doesn’t matter how many righteous policies you put forward; unless we’re great at evangelism, we don’t have anybody to vote for them.”
— Josh Howerton, [112:14]
Timestamps for Key Segments
- Church Update & Cultural Moment: [06:16–08:32]
- Prophecy—Scriptural Discussion: [08:33–41:00]
- Practical Evaluation of Prophecy: [33:14–37:08]
- Personal Prophetic Experiences: [54:53–58:24]
- Christian Nationalism—Setup: [62:05–70:12]
- Media Clips & Political Analysis: [63:48–70:12]
- Debunking Scare Labels & Defining Terms: [70:14–77:44]
- Secular Neutrality & Religious Liberty: [79:38–95:26]
- Great Commission & Politics: [101:01–112:14]
- Closing Call to Action: [113:29–end]
Conclusion
The episode is a robust, at times provocative, engagement with two climactic issues: the continuing role of prophecy in the church and the legitimacy of Christian influence in the American public square. The hosts reject reactionary fear (against either prophecy or Christian politics) in favor of scriptural discerning engagement—affirming the need for both evangelism and public discipleship, framed by historic faith and reasoned conviction. The tone is direct, unapologetic, and pastoral, challenging listeners to think biblically, live boldly, and act in both spiritual and civic spheres.
